This Application claims the benefit of and priority to Finnish Patent Application No. 20155719, filed Oct. 13, 2015, which is incorporated by reference herein in its entirety.
The present invention relates to garden tools, and more particularly to pruning shears.
Document EP 0 895 712 B1 discloses a lopper used to perform lopping, pruning and similar operations includes a lopping head provided with a spring-biased blade cooperating with a jaw, a drive mechanism, and an elongate housing. The drive mechanism includes first and second wheels rotatable relative thereto about a first axis. A head line couples the first wheel to the blade at a connecting point, and the second wheel is coupled to a driving line. The first wheel is eccentric relative to the second wheel so that a distance separating a region of a guiding surface of the first wheel from the first axis is smallest at a predetermined point of blade travel across the bight. The lopper also includes an intermediate handle and a lower handle selectively operable to actuate the blade relative to the jaw.
A problem with the lopper of the document is that the pull stroke of the handles is always the same length. A thin twig requires the same length of stroke as a thick branch, and therefore an excess work is needed when a lot of thin twigs need to be cut. If the mechanical advantage of the drive mechanism was made smaller for providing a shorter length of stroke, more force would be needed for cutting the branch.
An object of the present invention is to provide pruning shears so as to solve the above problem.
The objects of the invention are achieved by pruning shears which is characterized by what is stated in the independent claim. The preferred embodiments of the invention are disclosed in the dependent claims.
The invention is based on the idea of providing the drive mechanism of the pruning shears with two different mechanical advantages, having the smaller mechanical advantage in use when there is no cutting resistance to the blade, and having automatic toggling means for toggling the larger mechanical advantage, when the blade contacts with a branch.
An advantage of the pruning shears of the invention is that the mechanical advantage of the drive mechanism is small when there is no cutting resistance to the blade, thus providing short stroke distance, and large when the branch is contacted, thus providing more cutting power. The cutting is divided in two modes: 1) rapid movement of blade until it hits the branch, short stroke of the pull handle; and 2) slow movement of blade, long stroke of the pull handle.
In this way a long idle stroke of the handles is avoided when thin branches are cut and the movements of the user are optimized.
In the following the invention will be described in greater detail by means of preferred embodiments with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which
The invention relates to pruning shears 100 comprising
wherein
the drive mechanism 300 comprises
the tackle arrangement 320 comprises
the driving line 311 is arranged to transmit forces between the first pulley 321, the second pulley 322 and the sheave 323; and
the drive mechanism 300 comprises a rotation prevention means 340 for preventing rotation of the second pulley 322 in relation to the drive mechanism 300 when a drawing torque is applied to the second pulley 322, wherein the drawing torque is greater than a threshold torque, resulting in the second pulley 322 being stationary in relation to the drive mechanism 300 and the first pulley 321 rotating in relation to the drive mechanism 300.
In other words the tackle arrangement 320 provides the drive mechanism 300 with two different mechanical advantages by providing an automatic prevention of rotation of the second pulley 322 in relation to the drive mechanism, the prevention of rotation depending on exceeding of the threshold torque. When a drawing torque, that is greater than the blade torque but smaller than the threshold torque, is applied to the second pulley 322, the first pulley 321 and the second pulley 322 are arranged to rotate simultaneously.
The driving line is arranged to transmit the drawing torque between the first pulley 321 and the second pulley 322.
Preferably the blade 201 is biased with a blade spring 204. Preferably the driving line 311 comprises a string.
According to an embodiment the drive mechanism 300 comprises a cover 350 in connection with the cutting head 200 and the elongate housing 400, the cover 350 being provided with teeth 351 at the inner surface of the cover 350. Preferably the cover is made of plastic.
According to an embodiment the rotation prevention means 340 comprises a spring loaded pawl 341 arranged at the second pulley 322, wherein the spring loaded pawl 341 is arranged to engage with one of the teeth 351 of the inner surface of the cover 350. Preferably the teeth 351 are shaped so that the teeth 351 and the spring loaded pawl 341 form a ratchet. In other words the spring loaded pawl 341 is loaded with a compression spring 324.
According to an embodiment the diameter of the first pulley 321 is smaller than the diameter of the second pulley 322. According to another embodiment the diameter of the first pulley 321 equals the diameter of the second pulley 322.
According to an embodiment the drive mechanism 300 comprises a spiral torsion spring 301 attached from one end to the second pulley 322 and coupled from the other end to the first pulley 321, wherein the spiral torsion spring 301 is prestressed with a prestress force; a prestress torque to the first pulley 321 caused by the prestress force is greater than a blade torque caused by the blade 201 force; and the prestress torque acts as the threshold torque.
According to an embodiment the drive mechanism 300 comprises a part 302 attached to the second pulley 322, wherein the part 302 has an attractive magnetic force with a counterpart 303, wherein the counterpart 303 is coupled to the first pulley 321; a magnetic torque to the first pulley 321 caused by the magnetic force is greater than a blade torque caused by the blade force; and the magnetic torque acts as the threshold torque. In other words at least one of the part 302 and the counterpart 303 comprises a magnet that is arranged to attract the remaining part.
According to an embodiment the drive mechanism 300 comprises a support wheel 324 for supporting the sheave 323, the support wheel 324 being rotatable relative to the drive mechanism 300 about the axis 325 and arranged between the first pulley 321 and the second pulley 322, wherein
According to an embodiment the drive mechanism 300 comprises a support wheel 324 for supporting the sheave 323, the support wheel 324 being rotatable relative to the drive mechanism 300 about the axis 325 and arranged between the first pulley 321 and the second pulley 322, wherein
Preferably the sheave 323 is supported by the support wheel 324 so that the axis 325 of the support wheel 324 forms an angle of at least 80 degrees with the axis of the sheave 323. Preferably the sheave 323 is supported by the support wheel 324 so that the sheave 323 is arranged essentially tangentially in relation to the support wheel 324.
According to an embodiment the stopper 304 is arranged at the support wheel 324. According to an embodiment the stopper is arranged at the second pulley 322 or at the spring loaded pawl 341. According to an embodiment the stopper 304 comprises a pin.
According to an embodiment one end of the driving line 311 has been attached to the second pulley 322, wherein the driving line 311 runs counter-clockwise at least partly around the second pulley 322, via the sheave 323 and clockwise at least partly around the first pulley 321.
According to an embodiment the first pulley 321 is coupled to the blade 201 by a head line 330, the head line 330 being connected to the first pulley 321 at a first connecting point 331 such that the head line 330 is wound about a guiding surface 332 of the first pulley 321 as the first pulley 321 rotates about the axis 325. According to an embodiment the head line 330 comprises a chain. According to an embodiment the head line 330 comprises a string.
According to an embodiment the driving line arrangement 310 is arranged to rotate the first pulley 321 and the second pulley 322 when a drawing force is applied to the driving line 311, wherein the drawing torque is caused by the drawing force. In other words the drawing force is applied to the end of the drawing line 311 opposite the end of the drawing line 311 attached to the second pulley 322.
Alternatively the driving line 311 has been attached to the first pulley 321; and the drive mechanism 300 comprises a pull line 305 arranged to rotate the first pulley 321 when a drawing force is applied to the pull line 305, the pull line 305 being arranged to rotate the first pulley 321 in a direction where the driving line 311 is wound around the first pulley 321, wherein the drawing torque is caused by the drawing force. In other words the driving line 311 has been attached to the first pulley 321 at the end of the drawing line 311 opposite the end of the drawing line 311 attached to the second pulley 322.
When a drawing torque is applied to the first pulley 321, for example by pulling the driving line 311, and there is no resistance from a branch, the driving line 311 is unwound from around the first pulley 321; and the first pulley 321, the support wheel 324 and the second pulley 322 are rotating together as one unit. When the blade 201 hits the branch the driving line 311 will pull the support wheel 324 and the second pulley 322 apart from their initial position relative to each other, the pin acting as the stopper 304 releases the spring loaded pawl 341 and the spring loaded pawl 341 engages with one of the teeth 351 of the cover 350, as illustrated in
In the first mode having a small mechanical advantage the diameter of the first pulley 321 determines the torque driving the head line 330. In the second mode having a large mechanical advantage the diameters of the first pulley 321 and the second pulley 322 determine the torque: the diameter of the first pulley 321 divided by two plus diameter of the sheave 323 divided by two times the tension of the driving line 311. If the diameter of the first pulley 321 and the diameter of the second pulley 322 are equal, the torque is doubled in the second mode having a large mechanical advantage compared to the first mode having a small mechanical advantage. If the proportion of the diameter of the second pulley 322 to the diameter of the first pulley 321 is 3/2 the torque in the second mode is 2.5 times the torque in the first mode. The travel of the driving line 311 in the second mode is also 2.5 times the travel of the driving line 311 in the first mode.
According to an embodiment the other end of the spiral torsion spring 301 has been attached to the first pulley 321; and the drive mechanism 300 comprises a stopper 304 arranged to prevent the spring loaded pawl 341 from engaging with the one of the teeth 351 of the inner surface of the cover 350 when the drawing torque between the first pulley 321 and the second pulley 322 is smaller than the threshold torque, and arranged to prevent the second pulley 322 from rotating in relation to the first pulley 321 due to the prestress torque.
According to an embodiment the counterpart 303 has been attached to the first pulley 321; and the drive mechanism 300 comprises a stopper 304 arranged to prevent the spring loaded pawl 341 from engaging with the one of the teeth 351 of the inner surface of the cover 350 when the drawing torque between the first pulley 321 and the second pulley 322 is smaller than the threshold torque.
According to an embodiment the stopper 304 is arranged at the first pulley 321. According to an embodiment the stopper is arranged at the second pulley 322 or at the spring loaded pawl 341. According to an embodiment the stopper 304 comprises a pin. According to an embodiment the stopper comprises a pin arranged at the spring loaded pawl 341 and the first pulley comprises a guide for interacting with the pin. The guide is shaped so that it forces the pin to retract the pawl because of the prestress torque or the magnetic torque.
According to an embodiment the sheave 323 is coupled to the blade 201; the driving line 311 has been attached to the second pulley 322; and the driving line 311 runs from the second pulley 322 at least partly around the sheave 323 and at least partly around the first pulley 321.
According to an embodiment the driving line 311 has been attached to the first pulley 321; and the drive mechanism 300 comprises a pull line 305 arranged to rotate the first pulley 321 when a drawing force is applied to the pull line 305, the pull line 305 being arranged to rotate the first pulley 321 in a direction where the driving line 311 is wound around the first pulley 321, wherein the drawing torque is caused by the drawing force.
Alternatively the driving line arrangement 310 is arranged to rotate the first pulley 321 and the second pulley 322 when a drawing force is applied to the driving line 311, wherein the drawing torque is caused by the drawing force. In other words the drawing force is applied to the end of the drawing line 311 opposite the end of the drawing line 311 attached to the second pulley 322.
In this embodiment the sheave 323 is attached to a block 206, wherein the block 206 operates the blade 201. This arrangement is illustrated in
When a drawing torque is applied to the first pulley 321, for example by pulling the pull line 305, and there is no branch in the bight 203, the first pulley 321 and the second pulley 322 will rotate together thus winding the driving line 311 around the second pulley 322. When the blade 201 hits a branch the increased tension in the driving line 311 through the block 206 will pull the first pulley 321 and the second pulley 322 apart from their initial position relative to each other causing the spring loaded pawl 341 to engage a tooth 351 of the cover 350. The cutting continues then with an increased force to the block 206 and blade 201. If the diameters of the first pulley 321 and the second pulley 322 are equal at the both ends of the driving line 311 through the sheave 323, the force and the travel of the pull line 305 is doubled in the second mode having a large mechanical advantage compared to the force and the travel of the pull line 305 in the first mode having a small mechanical advantage.
Because the prestress torque is greater than the blade torque, the pull motion can be divided into two or more short strokes instead of one long pull. In that case the prestress torque tends to rotate the second pulley 322 so that the stopper 304 prevents the pawl 341 from engaging with one of the teeth 351. During the back and forth motion of the pull the blade 201 maintains its position because it is wedged into the branch to be cut and therefore the blade spring 204 does not pull the blade 201 into the starting position. This feature enables the user to find a more comfortable position for cutting in awkward positions on e.g. a ladder.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
20155719 | Oct 2015 | FI | national |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
107577 | Will | Sep 1870 | A |
157610 | King | Dec 1874 | A |
476459 | Hamann et al. | Jun 1892 | A |
573548 | Sours | Dec 1896 | A |
640257 | Baer | Jan 1900 | A |
823367 | Ryan | Jun 1906 | A |
863111 | Smohl | Aug 1907 | A |
1066675 | Stowell | Jul 1913 | A |
1168125 | Stowell | Jan 1916 | A |
1429792 | Stiriss | Sep 1922 | A |
1455297 | Lyons et al. | May 1923 | A |
1502191 | Helwig | Jul 1924 | A |
1689648 | Voleske | Oct 1928 | A |
1760627 | Bernard | May 1930 | A |
1897532 | Pilcher | Feb 1933 | A |
2516946 | Barone | Aug 1950 | A |
4130938 | Uhlmann | Dec 1978 | A |
4599795 | Yokoyama | Jul 1986 | A |
4677748 | Kobayashi | Jul 1987 | A |
5241752 | Lutzke | Sep 1993 | A |
6345446 | Huang | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6526664 | Cech | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6829829 | Huang | Dec 2004 | B1 |
6935031 | Huang | Aug 2005 | B1 |
6938346 | Huang | Sep 2005 | B1 |
7127819 | Huang | Oct 2006 | B1 |
7530172 | Wu | May 2009 | B1 |
8220163 | Linden et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
20010005941 | Dimatteo et al. | Jul 2001 | A1 |
20020162227 | Cech | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20060156554 | Lin | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20080052916 | Lin | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080155835 | Lin | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080282549 | Lin | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090038162 | Shan | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20100043237 | Linden et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100043238 | Linden et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100162575 | Lin | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100192385 | Pittau | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100199502 | Linden et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20130099186 | Kommer | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20140008593 | Kingery | Jan 2014 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0 747 181 | Dec 1996 | EP |
0 895 712 | Feb 1999 | EP |
0895712 | Feb 1999 | EP |
1 153 713 | Nov 2001 | EP |
1 166 620 | Jan 2002 | EP |
2 022 320 | Feb 2009 | EP |
2 156 730 | Feb 2010 | EP |
2 156 731 | Feb 2010 | EP |
2 319 295 | May 2011 | EP |
120140 | Jul 2009 | FI |
2 468 665 | Sep 2010 | GB |
08-331979 | Dec 1996 | JP |
11-057243 | Mar 1999 | JP |
2002-066168 | Mar 2002 | JP |
Entry |
---|
Extended European Search Report, EP 16193480.7, Fiskars Finland Oy Ab, 7 pages (dated Feb. 28, 2017). |
Finnish Search Report, App. No. 20155719, Fiskars Finland Oy Ab, 1 page (dated Jun. 3, 2016). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20170099780 A1 | Apr 2017 | US |