This invention relates to pulley systems of the type typically used in rescue situations to raise or lower e.g. victims of accidents, such as fallen mountaineers, trapped potholers or industrial employees working at height.
It is well known that rope pulley systems are useful in providing a mechanical advantage for lifting or lowering a load, the magnitude of the mechanical advantage typically being a function of the number and/or diametric size of each pulley wheel so that relatively heavy loads can be lifted or lowered by a single person pulling or releasing by hand the pulley rope. Thus, a typical rescue pulley system can easily support the weight of an accident victim and the rescuer during the rescue operation, often with a mechanical advantage in terms of force applied to or released from the pulley rope of 5 or 6 to one.
Many pulley rescue systems are known which are particularly suitable for so called self-rescuing, such as is described in DE202013003344, although they are not usually suitable for e.g. accident victims who are unconscious or otherwise disabled. In such circumstances the pulley system has to cope with the combined weight of the rescuer and accident victim, who may be secured by a harness to a stretcher, leaving the rescuer with the task of single-handedly raising or lowering the victim from a secure position up to the fully extended limit of the pulley system, and thereafter repositioning the pulley system for the next phase of the rescue. This requires the rescuer to pull on the free end of the pulley rope in order to raise or lower the entire load carried by the pulley system, and then to reposition anchors such as ‘rope grabs’ sufficiently securely for the next phase of safely raising or lowering the combined load. In order to do this, the pulley system must be restrained from running in the opposite direction required of the rescuer, this usually being achieved by means of a one-way brake system permitting the pulley rope to travel in one direction only during the lifting stage of the rescue whilst permitting controlled decent of the combined load being carried by the pulley system, as required. Such rope braking and rope releasing mechanisms can be complicated to operate by the rescuer, more particularly when in extreme circumstances, such as in confined spaces or within complex steel structures.
The present invention is derived from the realisation that there is a need for a simpler system of engaging or disengaging, as the case may be, the pulley rope brake from the pulley system.
According to the invention there is provided a load-hauling device comprising or including, a pair of karabiners, each karabiner having an array of pulleys, a pulley rope fixed at one end to one of the karabiners via a becket eye below its respective pulley array, to anchor that end of the rope to the becket eye, the pulley rope passing sequentially between the pulleys of each pulley array to provide a mechanical advantage at the free end of the pulley rope when the pulley rope is pulled by a user of the device, a rotatable locking cam mounted between a cam yoke fixed around an end pulley of one of the pulley arrays, wherein the cam includes a cam spring to bias the cam to engage with the rope and permit movement of the rope in one direction while preventing movement of the rope in the other direction, the cam including an integral trigger and associated trigger locking mechanism whereby to selectively disengage the cam from the rope and allow the device to release a load carried thereby.
With this arrangement, the spring-biased locking cam assures the rescuer that unless it is released via the trigger it will always prevent unwanted movement of the rope and hence the load being carried by the second karabiner, whilst permitting the rescuer, normally attached to the first karabiner, to selectively operate the locking cam to engage or disengage with the pulley rope for the purposes of e.g. raising or lowering the load.
Conveniently, the locking cam trigger includes a spring-loaded projection, such as a detente ball, at the base of the trigger, the projection being partially engageable with a recess in the cam yoke whereby to temporarily disengage the locking cam from the rope against the bias of the cam spring. This permits the rescuer to easily engage or disengage the locking cam from the rope by simple finger pressure on the trigger, which is biased for safety to a closed position.
Preferably, the locking cam includes a stop member engageable with a formation on or in the cam yoke whereby to prevent over-rotation of the cam when disengaged from the rope. This arrangement ensures that the rotational movement of the locking cam is limited such that potentially catastrophic over-rotation, leading to the braking function of the cam effectively being disabled, cannot occur.
The rope-engaging locking cam preferably includes teeth, such as pointed teeth, with which to engage the pulley rope whereby to substantially prevent unwanted movement of the rope.
The invention will now be described, by way of example only, with reference to the accompanying drawings in which,
Referring firstly to
The arrangement thus far described is generally conventional and when the first karabiner 2 is fixed to an anchor point, a load attached to the second karabiner 4 can be lifted by the simple expedient of pulling the free end 6a of the pulley rope 6, such as by the arm of a mountain rescuer. The second karabiner 4 and associated load can therefor be raised towards the first karabiner 2 by incremental movements of the pulley rope 6 which utilises the mechanical advantage of the pulley system, which may typically be between five or six to one in terms of the distance travelled by the pulley rope 6 and the distance travelled by the load being hauled.
The invention therefore provides an elegantly simple mechanism for controlling by finger-pressure only the operation of a rope pulley system in which the cam mechanism 8 is biased towards the rope 6 but can be easily released as required.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5348117 | Pickering | Sep 1994 | A |
5538223 | Scace | Jul 1996 | A |
5918701 | Rogelja | Jul 1999 | A |
5927438 | Ostrobrod | Jul 1999 | A |
6189867 | O'Rourke | Feb 2001 | B1 |
7658264 | Mauthner | Feb 2010 | B2 |
9120654 | Chaumontet | Sep 2015 | B2 |
20080164096 | Rogelja | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20140131157 | Chih | May 2014 | A1 |
20140361564 | Huang | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20150183624 | Maurice | Jul 2015 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
918785 | Feb 1963 | GB |