The present invention generally relates to pulse-synchronized oscillators, and in particular to such devices embodied in semiconductor circuits and used in wireless networks.
Many forms of communication rely on a high degree of synchrony between transmitter and receiver to convey information. The examples are numerous: coherent FM receivers utilize phase locked loops, direct spread spectrum techniques are based upon modulating and demodulating a baseband signal with a synchronized chip sequence, optical links feature clock and data recovery receive circuitry, and likewise ultra-wideband (UWB) radio relies on receiver and transmitter synchrony.
Ultra-wideband (UWB) radio is a method of RF/wireless communications utilizing short duration pulses instead of a continuous wave sinusoid to transmit information.
It is well known that the time-limited, wide spectrum signaling in UWB promises greater network capacity over traditional radio architectures, allowing superior data-rate and spatial capacity at similar power consumption over short distances. The short pulse signaling also allows duty cycling of the RF front end to save power. However, achieving these benefits of ultra-wideband communications is contingent on precise synchronization between transmitter and receiver such that transmitted pulses are received. For instance, if a transmitter and receiver are not synchronized to the same clock and a pulse is transmitted, the receiver may not be active and miss the data. However, if the two are synchronized together, then the receiver will be able to capture the pulse even as the receive duty cycle is reduced.
A popular practical implementation of synchronization is in the use of a high speed DLL/PLL in conjunction with a digital pulse tracking backend that maintains synchronization throughout the period of communications. The drawback of this approach is that the receiver and transmitter clocks must have center frequencies matched on the order of ten to hundreds of parts per million to maintain adequate synchronization, thereby necessitating that the local oscillators of both the transmitter and receiver be referenced to well matched crystals so that frequency drift between them is minimized. This requirement for a crystal imposes a significant cost to a system that a manufacturer would ideally like to avoid.
A popular method of UWB signaling is time hopping for low to medium pulse rates on the order of hundreds of KHz to the low hundreds of MHz. The time hopping method of UWB transmissions is based on a transmitter sending time limited pulses of data at times known by the receiver, which looks at the received signal at the agreed-upon times and determines the data that was sent.
In one embodiment, transceiver, comprises one or more integrated circuits including an R.F front end adapted for connection to an antenna, a pulse detector coupled to the R.F. front end and adapted for detecting received pulses intended for the transceiver, and a pulse coupled oscillator including a monotonically increasing state function that is concave downward, wherein the oscillator is adapted for receiving synchronizing pulses from the pulse detector and for causing a predetermined state increment in the state function in response to received synchronizing pulses.
The pulse coupled oscillator may be adapted to include a blackout period, right after a state change, when state increments are not enabled. The pulse detector may be adapted to distinguish synchronizing pulses for the oscillator from data pulses being sent to the transceiver.
The transceiver may further comprise a control timer coupled to the oscillator and adapted to divide each cycle of the oscillator in to a multiplicity of time bins. The control timer may be adapted to enable the transceiver to detect any data signals present in predetermined ones of the time bins. The transceiver may further comprise a controller coupled to the control timer and adapted to disconnect power to the R.F. front end during predetermined time bins. The controller may be adapted to only connect power to the R.F. front end during time bins when the transceiver is intended to receive data pulses and synchronizing pulses.
The transceiver may further comprise a control timer coupled to the oscillator and adapted to divide each cycle of the oscillator in to a multiplicity of time frames and each time frame in to a multiplicity of time bins, wherein the control timer is adapted to enable the transceiver to detect any signals present in a same predetermined time bin in each time frame.
In another embodiment, a wireless network, comprises a plurality of nodes with each node including a respective pulse coupled oscillator implemented in a semiconductor circuit and having a monotonically increasing state function that is concave downward, wherein each oscillator is adapted to generate a change of state pulse at the end of a state function cycle, and transmit/receive circuitry located in each node and adapted for transmitting change of state pulses from each respective oscillator to other nodes in the network, and further adapted for receiving change of state pulses from other nodes in the network and applying them to the respective oscillator to cause a state increment in the respective oscillator.
Each transmit/receive circuitry may include and R.F. front end and a pulse detector coupled to received signals from the R.F. front end and adapted to identify synchronizing delta pulses from the other nodes.
Each pulse coupled oscillator may be adapted to include a blackout period, right after a state change, when state increments are not enabled.
Each node may include a control timer coupled to the respective oscillator and adapted to divide each cycle of the oscillator in to a multiplicity of time bins. The control timer may be adapted to enable the respective transceiver to detect any data signals present in predetermined ones of the time bins. Each node may include a controller coupled to the control timer and adapted to disconnect power to the R.F. front end during predetermined time bins.
Each node may include a control timer coupled to the oscillator and adapted to divide each cycle of the oscillator in to a multiplicity of time frames and each time frame in to a multiplicity of time bins, and wherein the control timer is adapted to enable the transceiver to detect any data signals present in a same predetermined time bin in each time frame.
Each node may be adapted to receive synchronizing pulses from other nodes over the wireless network.
The present invention is illustratively shown and described in reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:
a)-(d) are graphical depictions of the state function of two pulse coupled oscillators suitable for use with the present invention;
To facilitate synchronization between nodes of a wireless UWB network, the present invention utilizes a pulse coupled oscillator (PCO) system. The PCO system is composed of identical oscillators following a state function 30, 32, as shown in
The oscillators may also include a blackout period 39, as in
A generic system oscillator 40 implementing the state function of
An example of an all analog, on chip implementation of the generic oscillator 40 of
A generic system level view of a network 80 is shown in
Each node 82 also implements the pulse coupled oscillator 90 described above in reference to
The external controller is responsible for maintaining the state of the system (to determine in which step of the above process the node is functioning), to provide the bin of transmission and reception, to implement a suitable encoding scheme for the bit error rate of the system, and to record the detected data pulse. Since all pulse detection and processing functions are implemented on chip, the external controller only needs to run at the pulse rate, which is the slowest timescale in the system. Thus, even a simple, low cost microcontroller can be used as the controller.
Secondly, the pulse from inverters INV1-4116 differentially drives a UWB antenna modeled as a fourth order LC resonant circuit. First transistors M7122 and M10123 are turned on, causing initial resonance on the antenna. Since we want brief pulses, we turn on M9124 a short time later to damp that resonance. Inverters INV8 through INV24 are used to control the timing of the antenna driver through various delays. Switches SW1 and SW2, implemented using standard pass gates, enable BPSK modulation by driving in the aforementioned manner, or by driving with the opposite polarity using M8, M9 and M10.
The transceiver and network described herein establishes network communications by first establishing synchronization between the various nodes. Initially all transmitter and receiver nodes are in an unsynchronized state. At this point, all the nodes 82 transmit their synchronization pulse, which continually couples into each nodes' PCO circuit 90. This causes all the nodes to precisely synchronize. Both transmitter and receiver then transition into the locking state where they lock a high divide ratio phase locked loop (PLL) to the sync signal, which serves as the global clock in the system. This local clock can be used to time “bins” in each “frame” such that transmission codes can be uniquely defined and detected for each node. Upon the reception of the synchronization sequence, the receiver and transmitter know they are matched to within a bin and hence can turn off the RF for all but 2 bins (the known data bin and the synchronization bin). This lowers the duty cycle and hence the RF power consumption to 2/NBINS. At this point, secondary acquisition can occur with delay locked loops triggered by the bin valid rising edge. The delay locked loops lock to the arrival time of the pulse and turn on the RF amplifier shortly before the pulse is expected to arrive. The same process occurs in the sync bin. This generates a very tight window of time when the RF system is on around the anticipated arrival time of the pulse. It should be noted that the roles of transmitter and receiver are interchangeable, since both circuits are identical, and in principle full duplex communications is possible.
The present invention uses pulse coupled oscillators (PCOs) to replace the external crystal as the frequency reference source in node to node communications thus allowing implementation in semiconductor circuits. Collections of nodes using the PCO system have been rigorously proven to synchronize in a self organizing manner, thereby generating a global clock that is common to the communicating nodes. The PCO system also has the characteristic where the network will self-recover from any node joining in or leaving. With a global clock established, node to node communications can then be established based on that global clock. The present invention is probably most useful for ultra-wideband, impulse based communications systems, since comparable alternative methods for establishing a common reference time between receiver and transmitter are not implemented in a semiconductor circuit.
The present invention is illustratively described above in reference to the disclosed embodiments. Various modifications and changes may be made to the disclosed embodiments by persons skilled in the art without departing from the scope of the present invention as defined in the appended claims.
The present application is the U.S. national phase entry under 35 U.S.C. §371 of International Application No. PCT/US08/72141 filed Aug. 4, 2008 entitled PULSE COUPLED OSCILLATOR SYNCHRONIZATION FOR WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS, which in turn claims priority to U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 60/953,859 filed Aug. 3, 2007 entitled PULSE COUPLED OSCILLATOR BASED SYCHRONIZATION FOR WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS, which are incorporated by reference herein in their entirety for all purposes.
This invention was made with U.S. government support from the Army Research Office, under Contract Number W911NF-05-1-0515. The U.S. government has certain rights in this invention.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/US2008/072141 | 8/4/2008 | WO | 00 | 2/22/2010 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2009/029395 | 3/5/2009 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
6762712 | Kim | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6812884 | Richley et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6952456 | Aiello et al. | Oct 2005 | B1 |
6959031 | Haynes et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6970448 | Sparrell et al. | Nov 2005 | B1 |
6989782 | Walker et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7046618 | Santhoff et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7088795 | Aiello et al. | Aug 2006 | B1 |
7233630 | Murakami et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7292656 | Kloper et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7356019 | Hirt et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7366754 | Wetzel et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7369598 | Fontana et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7480324 | Aiello et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7483483 | Lakkis | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7545188 | Xu et al. | Jun 2009 | B1 |
7606335 | Kloper et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7609608 | Rogerson et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7664760 | Christian et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7929596 | Lakkis | Apr 2011 | B2 |
8045935 | Lakkis et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8102905 | Roovers et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8111783 | Kloper et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1852998 | Nov 2007 | EP |
Entry |
---|
Hong, Y.-W. et al. A Scalable Synchronization Protocol for Large Scale Sensor Networks and Its Applications, IEEE J. Sac, 23(5), 1085-1099, May 2005. |
Mirollo, R. E. et al. Synchronization of Pulse-Coupled Biological Oscillators, Siam J. Appl. Math. 50(6), 1645-1662, Dec. 1990. |
Bush, S. F. Low-Energy Sensor Network Time Synchronization as an Emergent Property, ICCCN 2005, Proc. 14th Int'l Conf. Comp. Comm. & Net., Oct. 17-19, 2005, 93-98. |
International Search Report dated Apr. 16, 2009 for PCT/US08/72141. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20100190517 A1 | Jul 2010 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60953859 | Aug 2007 | US |