1. Field of the Invention
The invention relates to a detector circuit for weighting impulsive disturbances in relation to their influence on digital radio systems.
2. Related Technology
A weighting detector of this type is known from DE 101 26 830 A1. It is also already known from DE 101 26 830 A1 to use a peak detector instead of the rms (root mean square) detector. Although these known weighting detectors take into account the profile of the weighting curve above and below the cut-off frequency, which for GSM for example is 1 kHz, it has been found that some measured pulse disturbance weighting profiles have a flat profile at high pulse repetition frequencies and only at relatively low pulse repetition frequencies pass into a profile which rises by approximately 10 dB/decade. Pulse disturbance weighting profiles of this type are therefore not optimally weighted by these known weighting detectors.
The invention therefore provides a weighting detector for impulsive disturbance of the type mentioned at the outset which correctly weights impulsive disturbances not only above and below the recognized cut-off frequency but also at high pulse repetition frequencies.
According to the invention, a detector circuit for weighting of impulsive disturbances in relation to their influence on digital radio system comprises a cascade circuit of an rms detector and a linear average detector, and a first peak detector arranged upstream of the rms detector.
The combination in accordance with the invention of the two known measures of the type mentioned at the outset allows correct weighting even at high pulse repetition frequencies, for example impulsive disturbances above 100 kHz.
The invention will be described hereinafter in greater detail using an exemplary embodiment and with reference to the schematic drawings, in which:
The peak detector PK1 has a maximum measurement time T1=1/fc1, fc1 being between 10 kHz and 500 kHz, preferably 100 kHz.
The subsequent rms detector RMS is limited, in relation to the integration time T2 thereof as a function of the cut-off frequency fc2, to T2=1/fc2. For GSM, for example, the cut-off frequency fc2 is 1 kHz; below this frequency, the rms detector weights the impulsive disturbances excessively highly, as is described in detail in DE 101 26 830 A1. For GSM, the cut-off frequency fc2 is approximately between 0.5 and 2 kHz. However, it has also already been ascertained that this cut-off frequency can be as low as 5 Hz. The preferably utilized cut-off frequency of 1 kHz entails an integration time of 1 ms.
The rms detector RMS weights the rms value of the impulsive disturbances in successive packets having the duration of the integration time. These rms value packets are then averaged in the linear average detector AV. This linear average detector operates below the cut-off frequency fc2, so overall a weighting curve according to
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
10 2004 048 004 | Oct 2004 | DE | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2005/010608 | 9/30/2005 | WO | 00 | 8/7/2007 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2006/037577 | 4/13/2006 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4736163 | Berkhout et al. | Apr 1988 | A |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
10126830 | Jun 2003 | DE |
0 379 050 | Jul 1990 | EP |
Entry |
---|
“Weighting of Interference According to its Effect on Digital Communications Services,” Manfred Stecher, Aug. 24, 1998, pp. 69-73. |
“Critical Review of Converting Spectral Data into Prospective Bit Error Rates,” Axel Knobloch and Heyno Garbe, Aug. 19, 2002, pp. 173-178. |
“A Weighting Dector for the Effect of Interference on Digital Radiocommunication Services,” Manfred Stecher, May 11, 2003, pp. 449-452. |
International Search Report for PCT/EP2005/010608; mailed Jan. 13, 2006. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20070297456 A1 | Dec 2007 | US |