1. Field of the Invention
The present invention is related to integrated circuits incorporating resonant clocking schemes, and more specifically to techniques for changing the mode of pulse-driven clocking schemes during operation.
2. Description of Related Art
Resonant clocking of digital integrated circuits provides low energy consumption and well-controlled clock characteristics, including reduction of jitter and predictable point-to-point delay. In some implementations, a reduced pulse width is employed in resonant clock drivers to further decrease energy consumption, since the clock drive only needs to be active long enough to restore the energy that is lost in the portions (sectors) of the resonant clock distribution network that is being driven by the individual clock drivers.
Mode changing in a resonant clock distribution network is needed for variable operating frequency, for example, in a processor integrated circuit with “turbo” operating modes or in which voltage-frequency scaling is employed to reduce energy consumption when processor activity is low. The mode changing may change operating frequency and/or may change the clock mode from resonant distribution to non-resonant. However, when changing the mode in a resonant clock distribution network, which generally also requires a change in the pulse width of the clock, the mode change may generate a glitch that can cause improper operation of the integrated circuit in which the resonant clock distribution network is implemented.
It would therefore be desirable to provide a pulse-driven resonant clocking circuit that can change modes during operation without causing clock glitches.
The invention is embodied in a method of operation of a resonant clock driver circuit that provides for mode changing during operation.
The circuit is a clock driver for a resonant clock distribution network that includes a pulse width control circuit having selectable operating modes corresponding to multiple clocking modes of the resonant clock distribution network. The pulse width control circuit includes a delay line that has a selectable delay length to provide pulse enable signals that control the pulse widths of the clock drivers in a sector of the resonant clock distribution network. The delay line responds to a mode control signal so that at least one pulse width of the output is changed from a first pulse width to a second pulse width without generating half-cycles with a pulse width narrower than the first or second pulse width. In one implementation, the delay line is formed by an inverter (or buffer) chain having variable strength, so that the delay can be changed without including taps, i.e., multiple tap points of the delay line that can be selected using multiplexers or other logic. In another implementation, the delay line is a tapped delay line that includes a control circuit which prevents selecting a tap during intervals in which the output pulse width will be narrower than the first or second pulse width. The tapped delay line may also be split into two tapped delay lines, one for the pulse width of a first clock state and the other for the pulse width of the second clock state, so that the intervals in which tap selection is prevented are less constrained.
The foregoing and other objectives, features, and advantages of the invention will be apparent from the following, more particular, description of the preferred embodiment of the invention, as illustrated in the accompanying drawings.
The novel features believed characteristic of the invention are set forth in the appended claims. The invention itself, however, as well as a preferred mode of use, further objectives, and advantages thereof, will best be understood by reference to the following detailed description of the invention when read in conjunction with the accompanying Figures, wherein like reference numerals indicate like components, and:
The present invention relates to digital integrated circuits containing resonant clock distribution networks, such as memory devices, processors and other circuits in which variable frequency and low power operation are desirable. The resonant clocking circuits disclosed herein are high-efficiency pulse-driven circuits that have selectable pulse widths corresponding to the different operating modes of the resonant clock distribution network. The clocking circuits include a delay line that controls the pulse widths and responds to a mode control signal so that at least one pulse width of the output is changed from a first pulse width to a second pulse width without generating half-cycles with a pulse width narrower than the first or second pulse width.
With reference now to the figures, and in particular with reference to
Referring now to
Referring now to
Referring now to
Pulse width control circuit 32A includes a delay line formed by a plurality of cascaded inverters 40 (or buffers, as a buffer is generally a pair of cascaded inverters) that delay global clock signal clk to produce a delayed clock dclk and are controlled according to mode control signal mode control so that the delay time of the cascade of inverters 40 is selectable. The output of a last one of inverters 40 is gated by a logic circuit composed of a logical-OR gate OR1, a logical-AND gate AND1, with an inverter I1 illustrated to provide a complement to a control signal Pulse En that enables pulse width control of clock drive output stage 34, so that, for example, pulse width control can be disabled when non-resonant clocking mode is selected. Another logic circuit is provided to enable and disable clocking entirely and is composed of logical-NAND gate NAND1, logical-NOR gate NOR1 with an inverter I2 illustrated to provide a complement to a control signal Clk En that enables clocking of clock drive output stage 34.
Referring now to
Referring now to
Referring now to
Design flow 100 may vary depending on the type of representation being designed. For example, a design flow 100 for building an application specific IC (ASIC) may differ from a design flow 100 for designing a standard component or from a design flow 100 for instantiating the design into a programmable array, for example a programmable gate array (PGA) or a field programmable gate array (FPGA) offered by Altera Inc. or Xilinx, Inc.
Design process 110 preferably employs and incorporates hardware and/or software modules for synthesizing, translating, or otherwise processing a design/simulation functional equivalent of the components, circuits, devices, or logic structures shown in
Design process 110 may include hardware and software modules for processing a variety of input data structure types including Netlist 180. Such data structure types may reside, for example, within library elements 130 and include a set of commonly used elements, circuits, and devices, including models, layouts, and symbolic representations, for a given manufacturing technology (e.g., different technology nodes, 32 nm, 45 nm, 90 nm, etc.). The data structure types may further include design specifications 140, characterization data 150, verification data 160, design rules 170, and test data files 185 which may include input test patterns, output test results, and other testing information. Design process 110 may further include, for example, standard mechanical design processes such as stress analysis, thermal analysis, mechanical event simulation, process simulation for operations such as casting, molding, and die press forming, etc. One of ordinary skill in the art of mechanical design can appreciate the extent of possible mechanical design tools and applications used in design process 110 without deviating from the scope and spirit of the invention. Design process 110 may also include modules for performing standard circuit design processes such as timing analysis, verification, design rule checking, place and route operations, etc.
Design process 110 employs and incorporates logic and physical design tools such as HDL compilers and simulation model build tools to process input design structure 120 together with some or all of the depicted supporting data structures along with any additional mechanical design or data (if applicable), to generate a second design structure 190. Design structure 190 resides on a storage medium or programmable gate array in a data format used for the exchange of data of mechanical devices and structures (e.g. information stored in a IGES, DXF, Parasolid XT, JT, DRG, or any other suitable format for storing or rendering such mechanical design structures). Similar to input design structure 120, design structure 190 preferably comprises one or more files, data structures, or other computer-encoded data or instructions that reside on transmission or data storage media and that when processed by an ECAD system generate a logically or otherwise functionally equivalent form of one or more of the embodiments of the invention shown in
Design structure 190 may also employ a data format used for the exchange of layout data of integrated circuits and/or symbolic data format (e.g. information stored in a GDSII (GDS2), GL1, OASIS, map files, or any other suitable format for storing such design data structures). Design structure 190 may comprise information such as, for example, symbolic data, map files, test data files, design content files, manufacturing data, layout parameters, wires, levels of metal, vias, shapes, data for routing through the manufacturing line, and any other data required by a manufacturer or other designer/developer to produce a device or structure as described above and shown in
While the invention has been particularly shown and described with reference to the preferred embodiments thereof, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that the foregoing and other changes in form, and details may be made therein without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention.
The present Application is a Continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/814,780, filed on Jul. 31, 2015 and claims priority thereto under 35 U.S.C. §120. The disclosure of the above-referenced parent U.S. patent application is incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5559478 | Athas et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
6983394 | Morrison et al. | Jan 2006 | B1 |
7015765 | Shepard et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7145408 | Shepard et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7206343 | Pearce | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7237217 | Restle | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7286947 | Cranford, Jr. et al. | Oct 2007 | B1 |
7400555 | Franch et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7571410 | Restle | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7719316 | Chueh et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7719317 | Chueh et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7742388 | Shearer et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7872539 | Athas | Jan 2011 | B1 |
7880551 | Chan et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7944229 | Joshi et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
7956664 | Chueh et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7961559 | Dixon et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
8289063 | Chueh et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8339209 | Papaefthymiou et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8358163 | Papaefthymiou et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8362811 | Papaefthymiou et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8368450 | Papaefthymiou et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8400192 | Papaefthymiou et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8461873 | Ishii et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8466739 | Kim et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8502569 | Papaefthymiou et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8576000 | Kim et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8593183 | Papaefthymiou et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8611379 | Raghavan et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8659338 | Papaefthymiou et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8704576 | Bucelot et al. | Apr 2014 | B1 |
8729975 | Van Goor et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
8736342 | Bucelot et al. | May 2014 | B1 |
8847652 | Chern et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8854100 | Sathe et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
9054682 | Bucelot et al. | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9058130 | Bucelot et al. | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9116204 | O'Mahony et al. | Aug 2015 | B2 |
20020057126 | Hsu et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020130699 | Zimlich | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20030189451 | Ziesler et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030191977 | Ziesler et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030201803 | Kim et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20060082387 | Papaefthymiou et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060171223 | Kim | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20070096957 | Papaefthymiou et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20080150605 | Chueh et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080303552 | Chueh et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20080303576 | Chueh et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090027085 | Ishii et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20110084736 | Papaefthymiou et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110084772 | Papaefthymiou et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110084773 | Papaefthymiou et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110084774 | Papaefthymiou et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110084775 | Papaefthymiou et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110090018 | Papaefthymiou et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110090019 | Papaefthymiou et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110095802 | Horikoshi et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110140753 | Papaefthymiou et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110210761 | Ishii et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110215854 | Chueh et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110216604 | Mikajiri et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110260781 | Takeuchi et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20120044958 | Raghavan et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20130194018 | Papaefthymiou et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130328608 | Papaefthymiou et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140002175 | Papaefthymiou et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140002204 | Kim et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140015585 | Papaefthymiou et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140028407 | Chern et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140035649 | Nedovic | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140062562 | Sathe et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140062565 | Sathe | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140062566 | Sathe et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140079169 | Raghavan et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140167832 | Bucelot et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140167868 | Guthaus | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140240021 | Hibbeler et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140317389 | Wenisch et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20150002204 | Aipperspach et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
Entry |
---|
List of IBM Patents or Patent Applications Treated as Related, 2 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/040,423, filed Feb. 10, 2016, Franch, et al. |
Jain, et al., “On-Chip Delay Measurement Circuit”, 2012 17th IEEE European Test Symposium, May 28-31, 2012, 6 pages (pp. 1-6 in pdf), IEEE Computer Society, Annecy, France. |
Chan, et al., “Design of Resonant Global Clock Distributions” Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Computer Design, ICCD '03, Oct. 13-15, 2003, 6 pages(pp. 1-6 in pdf), IEEE Computer Society, San Jose, CA, US. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/303,671, filed Jun. 13, 2014, Bansal, et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/814,780, filed Jul. 31, 2015, Bucelot, et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/820,726, filed Aug. 7, 2015, Bucelot, et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/828,841, filed Aug. 18, 2015, Bucelot, et al. |
Chan, et al., “A 4.6GHz Resonant Global Clock Distribution Network”, 2004 IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conference, Feb. 18, 2004, 8 pages (pp. 1-8 in pdf), IEEE, San Francisco, CA, US. |
Chan, et al., “Uniform-Phase Uniform-Amplitude Resonant-Load Global Clock Distributions”, IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, Jan. 2005, pp. 102-109, vol. 40, No. 1, IEEE, US. |
Sathe, et al., Resonant-Clock Latch-Based Design, IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, Apr. 2008, pp. 864-873, vol. 43, No. 4, IEEE, US. |
Chan, et al., “A Resonant Global Clock Distribution for the Cell Broadband Engine Processor”, IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, Jan. 2009, pp. 64-72, vol. 44, No. 1, IEEE, US. |
Sathe, et al., “Resonant-Clock Design for a Power-Efficient, High-Volume x86-64 Microprocessor”, IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, Jan. 2013, pp. 140-149, vol. 48, No. 1, IEEE, US. |
Restle, et al., “Wide-Frequency-Range Resonant Clock with On-the-Fly Mode Changing for the POWER8 Microprocessor”, 2014 IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conference, Feb. 10, 2014, 3 pages (pp. 1-3 in pdf), IEEE, San Francisco, CA, US. |
Chan, et al., “A Resonant Global Clock Distribution for the Cell Broadband-Engine Processor”, 2008 IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conference, Session 28, Feb. 6, 2008, 3 pages (pp. 1-3 in pdf), IEEE, San Francisco, CA, US. |
Franch, et al., “On-chip timing uncertainty measurements on IBM microprocessors” IEEE International Test Conference, Oct. 2007, paper 1.1, pp. 1-7, Santa Clara, CA, US. |
Amrutur, et al., “0.84 ps Resolution Clock Skew Measurement via Subsampling”, IEEE Transactions on Very Large Scale Integration (VLSI) Systems, Dec. 2011, pp. 2297-2275, vol. 19, No. 12, IEEE, US. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/882,668, filed Oct. 14, 2015, Franch, et al. |
Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 14/814,780 mailed on Jun. 21, 2016, 14 pages (pp. 1-14 in pdf). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20170031384 A1 | Feb 2017 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 14814780 | Jul 2015 | US |
Child | 14828898 | US |