Pulse nozzle for filter cleaning systems

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 11872576
  • Patent Number
    11,872,576
  • Date Filed
    Wednesday, April 1, 2020
    4 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, January 16, 2024
    11 months ago
  • Inventors
  • Original Assignees
    • Altair (UK) Limited
  • Examiners
    • Popovics; Robert J
    Agents
    • Hunter; Christopher H.
Abstract
A nozzle for a filter cleaning system has a stub portion having an inlet opening and an outlet opening, and a splitter portion positioned downstream of the stub portion. The splitter portion has deflector surfaces arranged to direct the airflow exiting the stub portion outlet in 3 or more different/separate airstreams each of which airstreams are directed inclined axially outwardly from the axial direction of the airflow exiting the stub portion outlet opening. The various parameters of the splitter nozzle portion can be tailored to provide required jet shape and entrainment characteristics. A beneficial feature of the nozzle designs is that jet entrainment and recombination of flows can be specified for different shaped filters.
Description
FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The present invention relates to a pulse nozzle for filter cleaning systems, and filter cleaning systems using such pulse nozzles.


BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Pulse-cleaning systems for air filters use short pulses of compressed air to reverse the normal airflow in the filter and remove the dust from the filter media. Such systems are referred to as reverse-flow filter cleaning systems. The air is delivered through a nozzle which may be specially designed to increase the amount of entrainment into the resulting jet and thus the reverse airflow through the filter.


In order to optimise/maximise the cleaning flow for a given filter shape within a defined envelope, it is necessary to give consideration to the shape and distribution of the nozzle(s) and the velocity profile of the resulting jet.


For example, pyramid filters such as disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 8,440,002, use a 3 or 4-sided configuration which may not be cleaned effectively with a round jet or bifurcated jet as typically used for cylindrical or conical filters. Also, increasing the entrainment rate may enable the nozzle(s) to clean effectively, while reducing the distance between the nozzle exit plane and the filter and thus the overall size and cost of the filter house.


U.S. Pat. No. 7,195,659 discloses at FIG. 11 onwards various configurations of pulse nozzles that the present invention seeks to improve upon.


Previous work has been conducted on improving nozzle design for round cartridge filters and a range of different designs is in use. An exemplary design is shown in, for example, U.S. Pat. No. 7,585,343.


In US Patent Publ. 2007/0137151, the nozzle configuration uses multiple outlets directing pulsed air across thin wedges to attempt a similar effect for a large V-type filter.


SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

An improved arrangement has now been devised.


The improved nozzle comprises:

    • i) a stub portion having an inlet opening and an outlet opening; and,
    • ii) a splitter portion positioned downstream of the stub portion; wherein the splitter portion has deflector surfaces arranged to direct the airflow exiting the stub portion outlet in three or more different/separate airstreams each of which airstreams are directed inclined axially outward from the axial direction of the airflow exiting the stub portion outlet.


It is preferred that the deflector surfaces directing each airstream are substantially planar.


It is preferred that, for each airstream, two or more inclined deflector surfaces are provided, meeting at one or more intersections.


It is preferred that the intersections are linear and preferably are inclined axially outwardly from the axial direction of the stub portion.


It is preferred that the stub portion has a single/common outlet opening, which single/common outlet directs the airflow onto each of the deflector surfaces.


It is preferred that the outlet opening of the stub portion comprises a circular aperture.


It is preferred that the splitter portion is formed to have spacer sections (such as bridges, walls or webs) to separate the different/separate airstreams.


It is preferred that the spacer sections are present extending between adjacent deflector surfaces of the different/separate airstreams.


It is preferred that the spacer sections run longitudinally along the length of the splitter portion and are inclined axially outwardly from stub axis.


It is preferred that the spacer sections are each inclined axially at the same angle of inclination.


It is preferred that the spacer sections extend from the stub portion.


It is preferred that the deflector surfaces for each airstream define an airstream channel.


It is preferred that each airstream channel is of the same shape and configuration as the other separate airstream channels of the nozzle.


It is preferred that the splitter portion has a deflector surface leading edge configuration in which the airflow exiting the stub outlet is split into the different/separate airstreams at a common point along the longitudinal axis of the nozzle.


It is preferred that the splitter portion has a deflector surface leading edge configuration in which the airflow exiting the stub outlet is split into the different/separate airstreams, the leading edge being positioned contiguous with (or close to) the outlet opening of the stub portion. By ‘close to’ it is to be understood a distance of substantially 10 mm or less.


It is preferred that the splitter portion has a deflector surface leading edge configuration in which the airflow exiting the stub outlet is split into the different/separate airstreams, the deflector surface leading edge configuration extending transversely across the entirety of the outlet opening of the stub portion.


It is preferred that the nozzle further comprises a source of compressed air and means for delivering the compressed air to the nozzle.


It is preferred that the system includes a pulsation system for pulsing the air delivered to the nozzle.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The invention will now be further described, by way of example only, and with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:



FIG. 1 is a schematic view of a filter cleaning system in accordance with the invention;



FIG. 2 is a perspective view of an embodiment of a nozzle according to the invention;



FIG. 3 is a perspective view of a second embodiment of a nozzle in accordance with the invention;



FIG. 4 is a diagram of the nozzle geometry of an alternative configuration of nozzle in accordance with the invention;



FIG. 5 is a diagram of the nozzle geometry of an exemplary 3-way splitter nozzle in accordance with the invention; and



FIG. 6 is a sectional view through a 4-way splitter nozzle such as that shown in FIG. 3.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT

A reverse-flow pulsed filter cleaning system is shown in FIG. 1. The system is suitable for use in relation to generally known industrial applications such as that described in U.S. Pat. No. 7,195,659 for cleaning, for example, filter arrangements provided for a gas intake system for a gas turbine system. The reverse-flow pulsed filter cleaning system shown in FIG. 1 comprises a compressed air header 1 with a number of pulse valves 2, each of which is connected to a blowpipe 3. The blowpipe 3 delivers a short pulse of compressed air to one or more nozzles 4. Each nozzle directs the resulting pulse jet in such a way as to reverse the air flow through a single filter 5. The nozzle may be attached to the side of the blowpipe via a saddle (as shown at 6) or mated directly to the open end of the blowpipe.


As illustrated in FIGS. 2-4, in the present invention, the nozzle utilizes a splitter nozzle portion 7 with a stellate or pyramidal wedge—typically, but not exclusively, three or four-pointed/sided. The splitter nozzle portion is placed flow-wise downstream of a single converging or convergent-divergent (typically) round stub nozzle 8. The leading edge of the splitter may be coincident with the nozzle exit plane or a few (e.g. 5-15) millimetres downstream. The splitter deflects and divides the flow issuing from a single nozzle into multiple (three or more) streams angled away from the nozzle axis 9, thus allowing increased entrainment due to the increased surface area of the shear layer. Side plate spacers 10 may be used to attach the splitter to the stub nozzle. In some configurations these also aid the jet/airstream separation.


The angle at which the jets/airstreams diverge, whether and where they subsequently re-combine to form a single jet with a non-circular cross-section, is controlled by splitter angles, length, position, cross-section shape and (optionally) side plates spacers 10. CFD simulation and experimental testing can be used to determine the effect of these parameters on entrainment ratio and jet cross-section. In this way, a nozzle with specific values of these parameters can be used provide the optimum cleaning flow for a given filter size and/or shape.


The various parameters of the splitter nozzle portion 7, the spacing from the sub nozzle portion 8, and the geometry of the stub nozzle portion 8 can be tailored to provide the required jet shape and entrainment characteristics. A beneficial feature of the nozzle designs is that jet entrainment and recombination of flows can be specified for different shaped filters.


Referring now to the specific nozzle configuration of FIG. 2, the arrangement has a saddle 6 for mounting to the blowpipe 3, with the axis 9 co-aligned with the axis of an outlet aperture in the blowpipe 3. The splitter portion 7 is mounted to the stub nozzle portion by means of side plate spacers 10, and the splitter portion 7 has deflector surfaces 7a, 7b inclined axially outward from the axial direction of the airflow exiting the stub nozzle portion 8. In the arrangement shown in FIG. 2, the deflector surfaces of the splitter portion 7 direct substantially all the air exiting the stub nozzle portion 8 into three separate streams (A, B, C), each of which airstreams is directed inclined axially outward from the axial direction of the airflow exiting the stub nozzle 8. Separate pairs of deflector surfaces 7a, 7b effectively define separate airstream channels for each of the airstreams (A, B, C). Substantially all the axially flowing air exiting the stub nozzle 8 is therefore deflected (in a separate respective airstream channel) axially outwardly at a uniform airstream direction for each of the three airflows (A, B, C). The deflector surfaces 7a, 7b inclined axially outward intersect at a longitudinally extending intersection line 7c, which is also inclined axially outwardly from the axial direction of the airflow exiting the stub nozzle portion 8.


In this embodiment, the separate airstreams are separated at a common leading edge 7d of the splitter portion 7, which is contiguous with the single outlet opening of the stub nozzle portion 8. To an extent this is enhanced by the spacer side plates 10 separating the airflow into the separate airstreams (A, B, C) at that common leading edge 7d. The deflector surfaces 7a, 7b for each of the airstreams (A, B, C) are inclined to a common angle of inclination, as are the intersection lines 7c and the side plate spacers 10. The width of the side plate spacers 8 inclination of the surfaces 7a, 7b and/or the side plate spacers 10, can be tailored to modify the entrainment characteristics and downstream airstream recombination characteristics for the nozzle at given flow rates. The splitter nozzle portion 7 has a trailing edge 7e, and the initial jet/airstream trajectory is established by the deflector surfaces 7a, 7b before the airstream passes over the trailing edge 7e.


This embodiment is particularly adapted for use in a system designed to clean triangular cross-sectional tapering filters. However, the embodiment is also suitable for use with cylindrical or conical filters.


The embodiment shown in FIG. 3 is particularly adapted to clean square cross-sectional filters such as pyramid geometry filters, and shares many characteristics with the nozzle embodiment of FIG. 2. The arrangement is arranged to have a splitter portion 7 which has splitter surfaces 7a, 7b. The splitter surfaces 7a, 7b direct the airflow to lead into a planar deflector surface 7f, which is inclined axially outward to a trailing edge 7e. In the arrangement shown in FIG. 3, the deflector surfaces of the splitter portion 7 direct substantially all the air exiting the stub nozzle portion 8 into four separate streams (A, B, C, D), each of which airstreams is directed inclined axially outward from the axial direction of the airflow exiting the stub nozzle 8. Separate groups of splitter and deflector surfaces 7a, 7b, 7f effectively define separate airstream channels for each of the airstreams (A, B, C, D). Substantially all the axially flowing air exiting the stub nozzle 8 is therefore deflected (in a separate respective airstream channel) axially outwardly at a uniform airstream direction for each of the four airflows (A, B, C, D).


In this embodiment, the separate airstreams are separated at a leading edge 7d of the splitter portion 7, which is contiguous with the single outlet opening of the stub nozzle portion 8. This is enhanced/maintained by the spacer side plates 10 separating the airflow into the separate airstreams (A, B, C, D) at the leading edge 7d. The deflector surfaces 7f for each of the airstreams (A, B, C, D) are inclined to a common angle of inclination, as are the side plate spacers 10. The width of the side plate spacers 8 inclination of the surfaces 7f and/or the side plate spacers 10 can all be tailored to modify the entrainment characteristics and downstream airstream recombination characteristics for the nozzle at given flow rates. The splitter nozzle portion 7 has a trailing edge 7e, and the initial jet/airstream trajectory is established by the deflector surfaces before the airstream passes over the trailing edge 7e.



FIG. 4 shows schematically the geometry of an alternative nozzle splitter portion 7 that can be used to split the airflow into four separate airstreams (A, B, C, D). The arrangement is arranged to have a splitter portion 7 which has deflector surfaces 7a, 7b inclined axially outwardly from the axial direction of the airflow exiting the stub nozzle portion 8. In the arrangement shown in FIG. 4, the deflector surfaces of the splitter portion 7 direct substantially all the air exiting the stub nozzle portion 8 into four separate streams (A, B, C, D), each of which airstreams is directed inclined axially outward from the axial direction of the airflow exiting the stub nozzle 8. Separate pairs of deflector surfaces 7a, 7b effectively define separate respective airstream channels for each of the airstreams (A, B, C, D). Substantially all the axially flowing air exiting the stub nozzle 8 is therefore deflected (in a separate respective airstream channel) axially outward at a uniform airstream direction for each of the four airflows (A, B, C, D).


In this embodiment, the separate airstreams are separated at a leading edge 7d of the splitter portion 7, which is contiguous with the single outlet opening of the stub nozzle portion 8. This is achieved by the spacer side plates 10 separating the airflow into the separate airstreams (A, B, C, D) at the leading edge 7d. The deflector surfaces 7a, 7b for each of the airstreams (A, B, C, D) are inclined to a common angle of inclination as are the side plate spacers 10. The width of the side plate spacers 10 inclination of the surfaces 7a, 7b and/or the side plate spacers 10 can all be tailored to modify the entrainment characteristics and downstream airstream recombination characteristics for the nozzle at given flow rates. The splitter nozzle portion 7 has a trailing edge 7e, and the initial jet/airstream trajectory is established by the deflector surfaces before the airstream passes over the trailing edge 7e. In this embodiment, the side plate spacers 10 taper from a relatively narrower portion near the stub portion 8 to a relatively wider portion towards the trailing edge 7e in a similar manner to the embodiment of FIG. 2.


The geometry of the nozzle of FIG. 4 is defined by parameters as follows:

    • De Stub nozzle portion 8 outlet diameter
    • Lh Splitter nozzle portion 7 half height
    • Ls Splitter portion 7 length
    • Rs Radius of circle circumscribing splitter portion leading edge 7d
    • Xo Axial distance between stub nozzle portion 8 exit plane and splitter nozzle portion 7 leading edge
    • α1 Splitter half angle
    • α2 Splitter divergence half angle

      Rs>De/2
      Tan(α)=Lh/Ls


These geometrical parameters are also identified in FIGS. 5 and 6 for the nozzle designs shown in each of these figures, respectively.


The various parameters of the splitter nozzle can be tailored to provide the required jet shape and entrainment characteristics.


In FIG. 6, the airflow through the sectional view through the nozzle is shown.

Claims
  • 1. A nozzle for a filter cleaning system, the nozzle comprising: i) a stub portion having an inlet opening and an outlet opening; and,ii) a splitter portion positioned downstream of the stub portion along a longitudinal axis of the nozzle; wherein the splitter portion has deflector surfaces arranged to direct airflow exiting the stub portion outlet in three or more separate airstreams, each of which airstreams are directed inclined axially outwardly from the axial direction of the airflow exiting the stub portion outlet opening; wherein the deflector surfaces directing each airstream are substantially planar, inclined surfaces and at least two of the deflector surfaces for each airstream define an airstream channel; wherein each airstream channel is of substantially the same shape and configuration as the other separate airstream channels of the nozzle; and wherein the stub portion and the splitter portion are arranged such that substantially all the airflow exiting the stub portion is deflected by the splitter portion, into one of the three or more separate airstreams.
  • 2. The nozzle according to claim 1, wherein for each airstream, the two or more inclined surfaces meeting at one or more intersections.
  • 3. The nozzle according to claim 2, wherein the intersections are linear and are inclined axially outwardly from the axial direction of the stub portion.
  • 4. The nozzle according to claim 1, wherein the stub portion has a single/common outlet opening, which single/common outlet opening directs the airflow onto each of the deflector surfaces.
  • 5. The nozzle according to claim 1, wherein the outlet opening of the stub portion comprises a circular aperture.
  • 6. The nozzle according to claim 1, wherein the splitter portion is formed to have spacer sections to separate the separate airstreams.
  • 7. The nozzle according to claim 6, wherein the spacer sections extend between adjacent deflector surfaces of the separate airstreams.
  • 8. The nozzle according to claim 6, wherein the spacer sections extend longitudinally along the length of the splitter portion and are inclined axially outwardly from stub axis.
  • 9. The nozzle according to claim 8, wherein the spacer sections are each inclined axially at the same angle of inclination.
  • 10. The nozzle according to claim 6, wherein the spacer sections extend from the stub portion.
  • 11. The nozzle according to claim 1, wherein the splitter portion has a deflector surface leading edge orthogonal to the longitudinal axis of the nozzle, in which the airflow exiting the stub outlet opening is split into the separate airstreams at a common point along the longitudinal axis of the nozzle.
  • 12. The nozzle according to claim 1, wherein the splitter portion has a deflector surface leading edge in which the airflow exiting the stub outlet opening is split into the separate airstreams, the leading edge being positioned contiguous with the outlet opening of the stub portion.
  • 13. The nozzle according to claim 1, wherein the splitter portion has a deflector surface leading edge orthogonal to the longitudinal axis of the nozzle, in which the airflow exiting the stub outlet opening is split into the separate airstreams, the deflector surface leading edge extending radially from the axis of the nozzle, across the entirety of the outlet opening of the stub portion.
  • 14. A filter cleaning system, including a nozzle according to claim 1.
  • 15. The filter cleaning system according to claim 14, and further comprising a source of compressed air and means for delivering the compressed air to the nozzle.
  • 16. The filter cleaning system according to claim 14, and further comprising a pulsation system for pulsing the air delivered to the nozzle.
  • 17. A filtration system comprising a filter mounted in a filter housing adjacent a filter cleaning system in accordance with claim 14.
  • 18. The filter cleaning system as in claim 1, wherein the airstream channels are contiguous to one another and equally spaced around the splitter portion.
  • 19. The filter cleaning system as in claim 18, wherein each airstream channel is separated from an adjacent airstream channel by a side plate.
  • 20. A nozzle for a filter cleaning system, the nozzle comprising: i) a stub portion having an inlet opening and an outlet opening; and,ii) a splitter portion positioned downstream of the stub portion outlet opening along a longitudinal axis of the nozzle; wherein the splitter portion has deflector surfaces arranged to direct airflow exiting the stub portion outlet opening in three or more separate airstreams, each of which airstreams are directed inclined axially outwardly from the axial direction of the airflow exiting the stub portion outlet opening; wherein the splitter portion has a deflector surface leading edge which splits airflow exiting the stub outlet into the three or more separate airstreams, the deflector surface leading edge extending radially from the axis of the nozzle across the entirety of the outlet opening of the stub portion, to define the three or more airstreams.
  • 21. The filter cleaning system according to claim 20, wherein the deflector surface leading edge splits the airflow exiting the stub outlet opening into the separate airstreams at a common point along the longitudinal axis of the nozzle.
  • 22. The filter cleaning system according to claim 20, wherein the deflector surface leading edge is positioned contiguous with the outlet opening of the stub portion.
  • 23. The filter cleaning system according to claim 20, wherein the deflector surface leading edge extends radially in three or more directions from the axis of the nozzle across the outlet opening of the stub portion, to define the three or more airstreams.
  • 24. A nozzle for a filter cleaning system, the nozzle comprising: iii) a stub portion having an inlet opening and an outlet opening; and,iv) a splitter portion positioned downstream of the stub portion along a longitudinal axis of the nozzle; wherein the splitter portion has deflector surfaces arranged to direct airflow exiting the stub portion outlet in three or more separate airstreams, each of which airstreams are directed inclined axially outwardly from the axial direction of the airflow exiting the stub portion outlet opening; wherein the deflector surfaces directing each airstream are substantially planar surfaces and the deflector surfaces for each airstream define an airstream channel; wherein each airstream channel is of substantially the same shape and configuration as the other separate airstream channels of the nozzle; with each airstream channel being defined by a pair of inclined deflector surfaces extending in adjacent relation to one another and intersecting along a longitudinally extending intersection line, the deflector surfaces of each channel inclined axially outward from the axial direction of airflow, from a leading edge orthogonal to the longitudinal axis of the nozzle to a distal edge; and wherein the stub portion and the splitter portion are arranged such that airflow exiting the stub portion is deflected by the splitter portion, into one of the three or more separate airstreams.
  • 25. The nozzle as in claim 24, wherein the leading edge of the deflector surface of each airstream channel is contiguous with the stub portion outlet opening.
  • 26. The nozzle as in claim 24, wherein the leading edges of the deflector surfaces of all of the airstream channels intersect along a point along the longitudinal axis of the nozzle to split the airflow exiting the stub outlet opening into the separate airstreams at a common point along the longitudinal axis of the nozzle.
Priority Claims (1)
Number Date Country Kind
2002551 Feb 2020 GB national
US Referenced Citations (306)
Number Name Date Kind
2068332 Kneisley Jan 1937 A
2079315 Dickerson May 1937 A
2593420 Diehl Apr 1952 A
2657702 Weisenbach Nov 1953 A
2658625 Rafferty Nov 1953 A
2997845 Oulianoff Aug 1961 A
3007304 Wotton Nov 1961 A
3061038 Lawler Oct 1962 A
3073097 Hallett Jan 1963 A
3133412 Westley May 1964 A
3169109 Hirs Feb 1965 A
3241297 Hanes Mar 1966 A
3256679 Snyder Jun 1966 A
3258913 Moorehead Jul 1966 A
3377783 Young Apr 1968 A
3383774 Austin May 1968 A
3394532 Octiker Jul 1968 A
3395517 Lang Aug 1968 A
3421295 Swift Jan 1969 A
3429106 Abboud Feb 1969 A
3436899 Pausch Apr 1969 A
3498030 Wilki Mar 1970 A
3499268 Pausch Mar 1970 A
3509698 Medcalf May 1970 A
3541764 Astrom Nov 1970 A
3568415 Wyrough Mar 1971 A
3594992 Carr Jul 1971 A
3606736 Leliaert Sep 1971 A
3615052 Tumavicus Oct 1971 A
3650348 Colebrook Mar 1972 A
3680285 Wellan Aug 1972 A
3687399 Tumavicus Aug 1972 A
3726066 Colley Apr 1973 A
3733784 Anderson May 1973 A
3757497 Ray Sep 1973 A
3798878 Pausch Mar 1974 A
3816978 O'Dell Jun 1974 A
3816979 Wales Jun 1974 A
3838555 Kubiak Oct 1974 A
3844750 Ray Oct 1974 A
3853509 Leliaert Dec 1974 A
3874857 Hunt Apr 1975 A
3884657 Rebours May 1975 A
3890290 McCabe Jun 1975 A
3891418 Burger Jun 1975 A
3926595 Bockman Dec 1975 A
3942962 Duyckinck Mar 1976 A
3954426 Brange May 1976 A
3973731 Thayer Aug 1976 A
3976160 Hoch Aug 1976 A
3980233 Simmons Sep 1976 A
4033732 Axelsson Jul 1977 A
4073632 Reinauer Feb 1978 A
4113449 Bundy Sep 1978 A
4155850 Rathbone May 1979 A
4157899 Wheaton Jun 1979 A
4157901 Schaltenbrand Jun 1979 A
4159197 Schuler Jun 1979 A
4171963 Schuler Oct 1979 A
4218227 Frey Aug 1980 A
4251244 Evenstad Feb 1981 A
4253856 Paucha Mar 1981 A
4272263 Hancock Jun 1981 A
4278454 Nemesi Jul 1981 A
4289511 Johnson, Jr. Sep 1981 A
4292057 Ulvestad Sep 1981 A
4297115 Johnson, Jr. Oct 1981 A
4319897 Labadie Mar 1982 A
4356010 Meyer zu Riemsloh Oct 1982 A
4395269 Schuler Jul 1983 A
4422524 Osborn Dec 1983 A
4424070 Robinson Jan 1984 A
4433986 Borst Feb 1984 A
4436536 Robinson Mar 1984 A
4443237 Ulvestad Apr 1984 A
4445915 Robinson May 1984 A
4452616 Gillingham Jun 1984 A
4465497 Howeth Aug 1984 A
4468240 Margraf Aug 1984 A
4504288 Kreft Mar 1985 A
4514193 Booth Apr 1985 A
4536200 Reist Aug 1985 A
4539025 Ciliberti Sep 1985 A
4565631 Bitzer Jan 1986 A
4578092 Klimczak Mar 1986 A
4582605 Rea Apr 1986 A
4632680 Klimczak Dec 1986 A
4637473 Gillis Jan 1987 A
4638947 Jaqua Jan 1987 A
4645520 Huttlin Feb 1987 A
4655603 Palm Apr 1987 A
4666472 Klimczak May 1987 A
4680038 Titus Jul 1987 A
4690700 Howeth Sep 1987 A
4707899 Singer Nov 1987 A
4726820 Stanelle Feb 1988 A
4735638 Ciliberti Apr 1988 A
4738696 Staffeld Apr 1988 A
4754926 Singer Jul 1988 A
4764191 Morelli Aug 1988 A
4770118 Vohringer Sep 1988 A
4786293 Labadie Nov 1988 A
4789387 Nemesi Dec 1988 A
4806243 Jackson Feb 1989 A
4836834 Steele Jun 1989 A
4865627 Dewitz Sep 1989 A
4878617 Novotny Nov 1989 A
4941617 Russell Jul 1990 A
5002594 Merritt Mar 1991 A
5062867 Klimczak Nov 1991 A
5062873 Karlsson Nov 1991 A
5167676 Nakaishi Dec 1992 A
5178652 Huttlin Jan 1993 A
5393327 Chambers Feb 1995 A
5395409 Klimczak Mar 1995 A
5409512 Wilkerson Apr 1995 A
5435126 Beaudoin Jul 1995 A
5437412 Carletti Aug 1995 A
5545318 Richmond Aug 1996 A
5549734 Standard Aug 1996 A
5555909 Elliott Sep 1996 A
5562251 Elliott Oct 1996 A
5562746 Raether Oct 1996 A
5575826 Gillingham Nov 1996 A
5584913 Williams Dec 1996 A
5616171 Barris Apr 1997 A
5799872 Nesbitt Sep 1998 A
5837017 Santschi Nov 1998 A
5887797 Elliott Mar 1999 A
5941065 Lidstone Aug 1999 A
6022388 Andersson Feb 2000 A
6056796 Chiang May 2000 A
6070830 Mueller Jun 2000 A
6112850 Secrest Sep 2000 A
6129852 Elliott Oct 2000 A
6149716 Bach Nov 2000 A
6164563 Bouiller Dec 2000 A
6247317 Kostka Jun 2001 B1
6289676 Prociw Sep 2001 B1
6302931 Min Oct 2001 B1
6332902 Simonsen Dec 2001 B1
6365054 Kruger Apr 2002 B1
6551368 Kordas Apr 2003 B1
6554138 Bihlet Apr 2003 B1
6622488 Mansour Sep 2003 B2
6658988 Dries Dec 2003 B1
6716274 Gogins Apr 2004 B2
6884360 Chang Apr 2005 B2
6902592 Green Jun 2005 B2
7111448 Anderson Sep 2006 B2
7195659 Sporre Mar 2007 B2
7240493 Seiner Jul 2007 B2
7282075 Sporre Oct 2007 B2
7309366 Jensen Dec 2007 B2
7311823 Brooke Dec 2007 B2
7338544 Sporre Mar 2008 B2
7406827 Bernero Aug 2008 B1
7434384 Lord Oct 2008 B2
7475548 Toffan Jan 2009 B2
7475550 Seiner Jan 2009 B2
7481038 Blozy Jan 2009 B2
7485163 Yoshimoto Feb 2009 B2
7517393 Richard Apr 2009 B2
7585343 Clements Sep 2009 B2
7833329 Mahon, III Nov 2010 B2
7918907 Bitner Apr 2011 B2
7918908 Nahey Apr 2011 B2
7947099 Valentini May 2011 B2
7964007 Kim Jun 2011 B2
7967898 Sporre Jun 2011 B2
8029583 Ferguson Oct 2011 B2
8029607 Ray Oct 2011 B2
8069647 Anderson Dec 2011 B2
8075648 Raether Dec 2011 B2
8075674 Raether Dec 2011 B2
8114196 Lamee Feb 2012 B2
8118900 Raether Feb 2012 B2
8142551 Prud'homme Mar 2012 B2
8220420 Taylor Jul 2012 B2
8231715 Gross Jul 2012 B2
8307659 Rose Nov 2012 B2
8349044 Raether Jan 2013 B2
8382869 Jarrier Feb 2013 B2
8382870 Troxell Feb 2013 B2
8404021 Gillingham Mar 2013 B2
8484976 Leland Jul 2013 B2
8491708 Raether Jul 2013 B2
8496821 Ringenberger Jul 2013 B2
8534467 Haas Sep 2013 B2
8549850 Janakiraman Oct 2013 B2
8580004 Clements Nov 2013 B1
8617276 Raether Dec 2013 B2
8673066 Koyama Mar 2014 B2
8691001 Boatwright, Jr. Apr 2014 B2
8747533 Ekanayake Jun 2014 B1
8758486 Raether Jun 2014 B2
8864913 Haynam Oct 2014 B2
8876928 Szczap Nov 2014 B2
8894744 Appelo Nov 2014 B2
8899048 Prociw Dec 2014 B2
8910480 Suria Dec 2014 B2
8951321 Gillingham Feb 2015 B2
8984889 Wilbraham Mar 2015 B2
9067164 Raether Jun 2015 B2
9108135 Gillingham Aug 2015 B2
9126132 Raether Sep 2015 B2
9162234 Raether Oct 2015 B2
9186612 Wahlquist Nov 2015 B2
9200568 Kippel Dec 2015 B1
9221002 Shellenberger Dec 2015 B2
9309841 Troxell Apr 2016 B2
9464808 Paskevich Oct 2016 B2
9604172 Raether Mar 2017 B2
9718018 Haynam Aug 2017 B2
9731240 Koyama Aug 2017 B2
9737837 Wahlquist Aug 2017 B2
9757673 Gillingham Sep 2017 B2
9795908 Raether Oct 2017 B2
9897111 Mornan Feb 2018 B2
9976515 Akatsuka May 2018 B2
10035095 Joshi Jul 2018 B2
10245543 Raether Apr 2019 B2
10364751 Ryon Jul 2019 B2
10378477 Pesyna Aug 2019 B2
10391428 Holopainen Aug 2019 B2
10406458 Nehlen, III Sep 2019 B1
10408454 Lee Sep 2019 B2
10512870 Gillingham Dec 2019 B2
10556198 Raether Feb 2020 B2
10675578 Wahlquist Jun 2020 B2
10751764 Dagan Aug 2020 B2
10773202 Johnson Sep 2020 B2
10814256 Nehlen, III Oct 2020 B1
10814262 Jackson Oct 2020 B2
10955138 Wirtz Mar 2021 B2
10967320 Gillingham Apr 2021 B2
11000791 Jibert May 2021 B2
11111888 Prociw Sep 2021 B2
11123671 Raether Sep 2021 B2
11167235 Johnson Nov 2021 B2
11291935 Jibert Apr 2022 B2
11364509 Sturdy Jun 2022 B2
11371706 Harper Jun 2022 B2
11391463 Wirtz Jul 2022 B2
11433344 Handte Sep 2022 B2
11471798 Vallejo Oct 2022 B2
11673079 Nehlen, III Jun 2023 B2
11712650 Johnson Aug 2023 B2
11717775 Maiworm Aug 2023 B2
11738296 Stark Aug 2023 B2
11745133 Raether Sep 2023 B2
11801464 Jibert Oct 2023 B2
20040035091 Wang Feb 2004 A1
20040079231 Green Apr 2004 A1
20040187689 Sporre Sep 2004 A1
20050120881 Sporre Jun 2005 A1
20050252178 Richard Nov 2005 A1
20060060544 Brooke Mar 2006 A1
20060075726 Yoshimoto Apr 2006 A1
20060112667 Sporre Jun 2006 A1
20070039290 Lee Feb 2007 A1
20070137151 Sporre Jun 2007 A1
20080022855 Clements Jan 2008 A1
20080022856 Clements Jan 2008 A1
20080127827 Raether Jun 2008 A1
20080127828 Raether Jun 2008 A1
20080271607 Mahon Nov 2008 A1
20090107337 Vu Apr 2009 A1
20090166301 Ringenberger Jul 2009 A1
20090217630 Bitner Sep 2009 A1
20100107616 Janakiraman May 2010 A1
20110011042 Gillingham Jan 2011 A1
20110048236 Lamee Mar 2011 A1
20110114195 Haas May 2011 A1
20110209612 Bansal Sep 2011 A1
20110252964 Wahlquist Oct 2011 A1
20120067381 Raether Mar 2012 A1
20120073251 Troxell Mar 2012 A1
20120234775 Holopainen Sep 2012 A1
20130125754 Johnson May 2013 A1
20130133298 Troxell May 2013 A1
20130219839 Gillingham Aug 2013 A1
20130220125 Heidenreich Aug 2013 A1
20130298772 Raether Nov 2013 A1
20140001744 Haas Jan 2014 A1
20140059982 Koyama Mar 2014 A1
20140245704 Raether Sep 2014 A1
20140291418 Ruffing Oct 2014 A1
20140299682 Raether Oct 2014 A1
20150176545 Troxell Jun 2015 A1
20150182897 Ji Jul 2015 A1
20150343362 Gillingham Dec 2015 A1
20160016103 Raether Jan 2016 A1
20160082380 Seitz Mar 2016 A1
20170072344 Powell Mar 2017 A1
20170252691 Johnson Sep 2017 A1
20180071669 Jackson Mar 2018 A1
20190291028 Nehlen, III Sep 2019 A1
20200023386 Sturdy Jan 2020 A1
20200368663 Johnson Nov 2020 A1
20210039023 Nehlen, III Feb 2021 A1
20210229006 Nehlen, III Jul 2021 A1
20210260607 Taylor Aug 2021 A1
20220118393 Johnson Apr 2022 A1
20230001335 Powell Jan 2023 A1
20230226478 Bauer Jul 2023 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (6)
Number Date Country
2536219 Sep 2016 GB
2592267 Aug 2021 GB
295334 Mar 2018 IN
WO-9603195 Feb 1996 WO
WO-2016142172 Sep 2016 WO
WO-2021170985 Sep 2021 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (1)
Entry
Search Report for GB2002551.6 dated Jul. 22, 2020.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20210260607 A1 Aug 2021 US