1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates generally to the processing of signals obtained from a medical diagnostic apparatus, such a pulse oximeter, using near infrared spectroscopy, to remove artifact or noise effects from the signal representative of a physiological parameter of interest.
2. Description of the Related Art
This section is intended to introduce the reader to various aspects of art that may be related to various aspects of the present invention, which are described and/or claimed below. This discussion is believed to be helpful in providing the reader with background information to facilitate a better understanding of the various aspects of the present invention. Accordingly, it should be understood that these statements are to be read in this light, and not as admissions of prior art.
A typical pulse oximeter measures two physiological parameters, percent oxygen saturation of arterial blood hemoglobin (SpO2 or sat) and pulse rate. Oxygen saturation can be estimated using various techniques. In one common technique, the photocurrent generated by the photo-detector is conditioned and processed to determine the ratio of modulation ratios (ratio of ratios) of the red to infrared signals. This modulation ratio has been observed to correlate well to arterial oxygen saturation. The pulse oximeters and sensors are empirically calibrated by measuring the modulation ratio over a range of in vivo measured arterial oxygen saturations (SaO2) on a set of patients, healthy volunteers, or animals. The observed correlation is used in an inverse manner to estimate blood oxygen saturation (SpO2) based on the measured value of modulation ratios of a patient. Most pulse oximeters extract the plethysmographic signal having first determined saturation or pulse rate, both of which are susceptible to interference.
In general, pulse oximetry takes advantage of the fact that in live human tissue, hemoglobin is a strong absorber of light between the wavelengths of 500 and 1100 nm. The pulsation of arterial blood through tissue is readily measurable, using light absorption by hemoglobin in this wavelength range. A graph of the arterial pulsation waveform as a function of time is referred to as an optical plethysmograph. The amplitude of the plethysmographic waveform varies as a function of the wavelength of the light used to measure it, as determined by the absorption properties of the blood pulsing through the arteries. By combining plethysmographic measurements at two different wavelength regions, where oxy- and deoxy-hemoglobin have different absorption coefficients, the oxygen saturation of arterial blood can be estimated. Typical wavelengths employed in commercial pulse oximeters are 660 and 890 nm.
It is known that rapid motion or application of pressure to a tissue site can have the effect of changing the optical properties being measured at or near that site. The amplitude of the optical signal changes associated with such events, known as motion artifacts, can easily be larger than that due to the arterial pulse. In practice, this can lead to inaccurate estimation of the percent oxygen saturation by pulse oximetry. Various techniques for addressing and removing undesired signal effects, including motion artifacts are known. As used herein, noise refers to signal portions that are undesired or are not directly related to changes in optical properties that are related to the arterial pulse, and which may include motion artifact. The optical signal through the tissue can be degraded by both noise and motion artifact. One source of noise is ambient light which reaches the light detector. Another source of noise is electromagnetic coupling from other electronic instruments. Motion of the patient also introduces noise and affects the signal. For example, the contact between the detector and the skin, or the emitter and the skin, can be temporarily disrupted when motion causes either to move away from the skin. In addition, since blood is a fluid, it responds differently than the surrounding tissue to inertial effects, thus resulting in momentary changes in volume at the point near which the oximeter probe is attached.
Motion artifact can degrade a pulse oximetry signal relied upon by a health care provider, without the provider's awareness. This is especially true if the monitoring of the patient is remote, the motion is too small to be observed, or the health care provider is watching the instrument or other parts of the patient, and not the sensor site. There are various known techniques for addressing the effects of noise and/or motion artifacts.
For example, U.S. Pat. No. 4,714,341 discloses a method for combining three wavelengths to detect the presence of motion. The wavelengths are used two at a time to separately compute the oxygen saturation percentage. When the oxygen saturation values computed using different wavelength combinations are in poor agreement, this is assumed to be caused by motion artifact, and the value is discarded. A disadvantage of this approach is that the agreement or lack thereof between the saturation values may or may not be due to motion artifact. In addition, this approach does not identify or remove the effects of motion artifact, but instead discards values that appear suspect
Another approach involves the filtering of pulse oximetry signals. However, filtering methods require assumptions about the properties of the artifact that do not always hold in practice. In addition, this approach does not measure the motion-induced signal.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,482,036 provides another approach, and describes a signal processing method for artifact reduction that functions when the artifact-related signal is associated with blood that is at a lower oxygen saturation than the arterial blood. Such a method relies on the generation of an artificial noise signal, which is combined with the physiological parameter to reduce the effect of the unknown noise signal. This approach for reducing the effects of artifact, without separately measuring the motion signal, is based on assumptions about the effect of motion on the plethysmographic signal. Assumptions may or may not be true, and many assumptions are invalid
Each of the known techniques for compensating for motion artifact has its own limitations and drawbacks. It is therefore desirable that a pulse oximetry system be designed which more effectively and accurately reports blood-oxygen levels during periods of motion. While many have attempted to isolate the effects of undesired signal portions, such as motion-induced artifacts, by making potentially invalid assumptions or by rejecting suspect estimates of desired signal values, there still remains a need for a deterministic identification, determination and measurement of artifact signals, to enable an accurate measurement of the desired signal values in the presence of undesired signal portions.
Certain aspects commensurate in scope with the originally claimed invention are set forth below. It should be understood that these aspects are presented merely to provide the reader with a brief summary of certain forms of the invention might take and that these aspects are not intended to limit the scope of the invention. Indeed, the invention may encompass a variety of aspects that may not be set forth below.
By measuring the artifact signal, the present technique allows motion artifacts to be separated from the plethysmographic signal without the limiting assumptions of prior known techniques. The present technique provides methods for measuring the motion signal associated with changes in tissue optical properties and using the measurement to compensate plethysmographic measurements made at other wavelengths.
In one embodiment, the present technique provides a method of determining a physiological parameter, including measuring an absorbance at a wavelength chosen to be primarily absorbed by water, and measuring an absorbance at a wavelength chosen to be primarily absorbed by hemoglobin. A ratio-of-ratios is calculated between these absorbances, and the ratio-of-ratios is used to identify motion noise.
In another embodiment, there is provided a system for the minimization of motion noise artifacts in pulse oximetry. This system uses a pulse oximeter monitor configured to analyze an absorbance signal that is primarily reflective of motion noise, an absorbance signal chosen to be primarily absorbed by hemoglobin, and another absorbance signal chosen to be primarily absorbed by hemoglobin. In another aspect, the monitor may be configured to use the first and second absorbances to obtain a metric that identifies the presence of motion noise.
In another embodiment, there is provided one or more tangible, machine readable media, containing code which controls the measurement of an absorbance at a wavelength chosen to be primarily absorbed by water and the measurement of an absorbance at a wavelength chosen to be primarily absorbed by hemoglobin. Under the control of this code, a ratio-of-ratios is calculated between these absorbances, and the ratio-of-ratios is used to identify motion noise.
Advantages of the invention may become apparent upon reading the following detailed description and upon reference to the drawings in which:
One or more specific embodiments of the present invention will be described below. In an effort to provide a concise description of these embodiments, not all features of an actual implementation are described in the specification. It should be appreciated that in the development of any such actual implementation, as in any engineering or design project, numerous implementation-specific decisions must be made to achieve the developers' specific goals, such as compliance with system-related and business-related constraints, which may vary from one implementation to another. Moreover, it should be appreciated that such a development effort might be complex and time consuming, but would nevertheless be a routine undertaking of design, fabrication, and manufacture for those of ordinary skill having the benefit of this disclosure.
By measuring the artifact signal, the present technique allows motion artifact to be separated from the plethysmographic signal without the limiting assumptions of prior known techniques. The present technique provides methods for measuring the motion signal associated with changes in tissue optical properties and using the measurement to compensate plethysmographic measurements made at other wavelengths.
Sensor 100 is connected to a pulse oximeter 120. The oximeter includes a microprocessor 122 connected to an internal bus 124. Also connected to the bus are a RAM memory 126 and a display 128. A time processing unit (TPU) 130 provides timing control signals to light drive circuitry 132 which controls when light source 110 is illuminated, and if multiple light sources are used, the multiplexed timing for the different light sources. TPU 130 also controls the gating-in of signals from photodetector 114 through an amplifier 133 and a switching circuit 134. These signals are sampled at the proper time, depending upon which of multiple light sources is illuminated, if multiple light sources are used. The received signal is passed through an amplifier 136, a low pass filter 138, and an analog-to-digital converter 140. The digital data is then stored in a queued serial module (QSM) 142, for later downloading to RAM 126 as QSM 142 fills up. In one embodiment, there may be multiple parallel paths of separate amplifiers, filters and A/D converters for multiple light wavelengths or spectra received.
Based on the value of the received signals corresponding to the light received by photodetector 114, microprocessor 122 will calculate the oxygen saturation using various algorithms. These algorithms require coefficients, which may be empirically determined, corresponding to, for example, the wavelengths of light used. These are stored in a ROM 146. In one embodiment of a two-wavelength system, the particular set of coefficients chosen for any pair of wavelength spectra is determined by the value indicated by encoder 116 corresponding to a particular light source in a particular sensor 100. In one embodiment, multiple resistor values may be assigned to select different sets of coefficients. In another embodiment, the same resistors are used to select from among the coefficients appropriate for an infrared source paired with either a near red source or far red source. The selection between whether the near red or far red set will be chosen can be selected with a control input from control inputs 154. Control inputs 154 may be, for instance, a switch on the pulse oximeter, a keyboard, or a port providing instructions from a remote host computer. Furthermore, any number of methods or algorithms may be used to determine a patient's pulse rate, oxygen saturation or any other desired physiological parameter. For example, the estimation of oxygen saturation using modulation ratios is described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,853,364, entitled “METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR ESTIMATING PHYSIOLOGICAL PARAMETERS USING MODEL-BASED ADAPTIVE FILTERING,” issued Dec. 29, 1998, and U.S. Pat. No. 4,911,167, entitled “METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR DETECTING OPTICAL PULSES,” issued Mar. 27, 1990, both of which are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety. Furthermore, the relationship between oxygen saturation and modulation ratio is further described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,645,059, entitled “MEDICAL SENSOR WITH MODULATED ENCODING SCHEME,” issued Jul. 8, 1997 and incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
Having described an exemplary pulse oximeter above, the methods for reducing noise, including motion artifact effects in the received signals, according to embodiments of the present technique, are described below.
While not being limited to any particular theory, the present inventors have, particularly in plethysmographic data from reflectance sensors, noted a weaker effect of water than would be theoretically predicted from absorption spectra. One potential reason for this effect lies in the fact that hemoglobin is largely confined to the blood vessels, whereas water is present at high concentrations both in the blood vessels and in the surrounding tissue. As a result, the pulse-induced expansion of arterial vessels through a tissue bed results in a localized increase in hemoglobin concentration, but only a small net change in water concentration. To the extent that the water concentration in the blood is equal to the water concentration in tissue, the change in light absorption by water is expected to approach zero.
The embodiments of the present technique exploit the finding that in spectral regions where hemoglobin absorbs weakly and water absorbs strongly, the plethysmograph is more sensitive to motion-related events that perturb tissue than arterial pulsation, compared with spectral regions where hemoglobin is a strong absorber and water is a weak absorber.
The weak magnitude of the plethysmograph in regions of strong water absorption is exploited to enable the separation of arterial-pulse-related signal from a motion artifact signal. By measuring the optical plethysmograph at a wavelength where water is the dominant absorber, the change in tissue optical properties associated with motion or pressure can be measured, with little interference from the underlying arterial pulsation. Plethysmographs at four near-infrared wavelengths measured through a human ear undergoing occasional motion are shown in
By combining the plethysmograph measured in a spectral region where water is the dominant absorber with a plethysmograph measured where blood is a major absorber, the motion-related signal can be selectively removed.
By applying the same analysis to a diverse pool of 36 patients measured in a hospital setting, an average signal to noise increase of a factor of 2 of the plethysmograph at 910 nm was observed. By allowing the multiplier for the 1180 nm plethysmograph to vary between subjects, higher signal to noise improvements are achieved.
Theoretical Model
The derivation below and the alternative description that follows demonstrate mechanisms by which the effect of motion-induced changes in optical scattering on a plethysmograph measured at one wavelength can be compensated by plethysmographic measurement at a second wavelength. These are provided as examples of techniques for reducing motion-induced optical changes, but are not the only mechanisms by which the present technique may function, and thus are not meant to limit the embodiments of the present technique.
A starting point for the analysis is the diffusion theory of light transport in tissue (for example, see “Diffusion Theory of Light Transport”, Willem M. Star, in Optical-Thermal Response of Laser-Irradiated Tissue, edited by Ashley J. Welch and Martin J. C. van Gemert, Plenum Press, New York, 1995, pgs. 131-206). In the case where the transport-corrected scattering coefficient, μ′s, is much larger than the absorption coefficient, μa, the diffuse intensity of light, I(λ), measured at wavelength, λ, by a detector positioned a distance, l, away from a light source, can be described as follows (for example, see “Measurement of Blood Hematocrit by Dual-Wavelength Near-IR Photoplethysmography”, Schmitt, J. M.; Guan-Xiong, G.; Miller, J., SPIE, Vol. 1641, 1992, pgs. 150-161):
I(λ)α exp(−l√{square root over ((3μa(λ)μs(λ)))}{square root over ((3μa(λ)μs(λ)))} (eqn. 1)
For small changes in the absorption coefficient, such as those caused by arterial pulsation, the resulting change in intensity can be described by the derivative of intensity with respect to the absorption coefficient:
where ΔVart is the fractional volume change due to arterial pulsation, μaart is the absorption coefficient of the arterial blood under measurement, AC(λ) refers to the time varying portion of the optical signal and DC (λ) refers to the average or non-time varying portion of the optical signal.
The arterial oxygen saturation, SpO2, is estimated if the AC-DC ratio described by equation 2 is measured at two wavelengths, λ1 and λ2, that are chosen so that oxy- and deoxy-hemoglobin are readily differentiated (e.g., λ1˜approximately 660 nm, λ2.˜.approximately 910 nm):
where:
from which:
where μaHHb and μaO
The effect of small changes in the scattering coefficient, such as may be brought about by compression of tissue or motion artifact, are as set forth below by eqn. 4:
By measuring the AC-DC ratio at a third wavelength, λ3, chosen so that the absorption due to hemoglobin is weak but the absorption due to water is strong, the effect of the motion-induced scattering change are removed from the AC-DC measurement at λ2 by subtracting the scaled AC-DC measurement at λ3. The resulting motion-corrected plethysmograph, P, can be expressed as:
where:
When the effects of arterial pulsation (equation 2) and motion artifact (equation 4) are additive, equation 5 is expanded as follows:
When water absorption dominates the absorption of light by tissue at λ3, and the water concentration in the arteries and surrounding tissue is nearly equal, Δμa (λ3) is approximately zero, and equation 6 simplifies to:
Equation 7 depends only on the effect of arterial pulsation at λ2; the effect of the motion artifact has been removed. In a similar manner the plethysmograph measured at λ3 may be used to remove the motion effects from the plethysmograph measured at λ1. The corrected plethysmographs measured at λ1 and λ2 may then be combined and used to estimate oxygen saturation, as described, for example, by equation 3.
Several wavelengths in the range between approximately 900 and 1300 nm and more specifically in the range between approximately 1150 and 1350 nm have been tested and found effective at reducing motion-artifact from plethysmographs measured at approximately 910 nm. Wavelengths at the longer wavelength side of this range have the advantage of weaker absorbance of hemoglobin compared to that of water (for example, see
It is known that the detection of light beyond approximately 1100 nm cannot readily be accomplished with the silicon (Si) detectors that are commonly employed in commercial oximeters. For example, the detector used to collect the data displayed in
An Implementation of Motion Noise Reduction Technique
A practical technique by which the effect of motion-induced changes in optical scattering on a plethysmograph measured at one wavelength may be reduced by plethysmographic measurement at a second wavelength is described below. This technique and the derivation above should be considered examples, and are not the only mechanisms by which the present technique may function. They are not meant to limit the embodiments of the present technique.
In one example, three wavelengths of light are used: a red wavelength at 660 nm, a near infrared (NIR) wavelength at 890 nm, and a NIR wavelength at 1300 nm. The first two wavelengths are both chosen to be primarily absorbed by hemoglobin, and the third wavelength is chosen to be primarily absorbed by water. After these wavelengths of light from the light source 110 (See
Turning now to
In one such embodiment, the preprocessed NIR plethysmograph 214 and the preprocessed NIR (water) plethysmograph 216 are used to identify periods of high and/or low motion noise. This is performed by calculating a ratio-of-ratios, R1300,890, between the absorbances at the NIR wavelength (890 nm) and the water wavelength (1300 nm) (See Eqn. 3a above for an example). The value of this ratio is less than 1.0 for periods when there are little or no motion artifacts, ranging from around 0.2 to 0.7 for most subjects. In one embodiment, a default value of 0.4 may be selected for initial use by an algorithm as described herein. In an exemplary embodiment, R1300,890 is calculated on two periods: once using three seconds of data for rapid detection of motion artifacts, and once using fifteen seconds of data for use in adjusting the combined weights, as discussed further below.
In one embodiment, a three step process is used to generate plethysmographs with reduced motion noise. The first step is to subtract fractions (F) of the preprocessed NIR (water) plethysmograph 216 (Preprocessed1300) from the preprocessed red plethysmograph 212 (Preprocessed660), and the preprocessed NIR plethysmograph 214 (Preprocessed890), to generate corrected waveforms:
Corrected890=Preprocessed890−F1300,890*Preprocessed1300 (eqn. 8)
Corrected660=Preprocessed660−F1300,660*Preprocessed1300 (eqn. 9)
In such an embodiment, the second step is to rescale the corrected waveforms to preserve the ratio-of-ratios 222 (R660,890) between the absorbance signals at the red (660 nm) and NIR (890 nm) wavelengths, so that the coefficients in eqn. 3b will not need to change. This is performed by estimating the fractions (C890 and C660) of the arterial pulse that were cancelled in Corrected890 and Corrected660:
Rescaled890=Corrected890/(1.0−C890) (eqn. 10)
Rescaled660=Corrected660/(1.0−C660) (eqn. 11)
where:
C890=R1300,890*F1300,890 (eqn. 12)
C660=R1300,890*F1300,660 (eqn. 13)
R660,890 222 may be supplied by the two wavelength oximetry algorithm 230, which calculates this value for determination of the oxygen saturation. An alternative method for rescaling Corrected660 is to add a percentage of Corrected890 to maintain a constant value for R660,890:
Rescaled660=Corrected660+(F1300,660/F1300,890)*C890*Rescaled890 (eqn. 14)
In this embodiment, the third step in generating plethysmographs with reduced motion noise is to adjust the fractions, F1300,660 and F1300,890, of the NIR (water) plethysmograph 216 (Preprocessed1300) subtracted from the other two waveforms. Mathematical techniques may be selected that minimize the power, standard deviation, or amplitude of the resulting waveforms. Alternatively, techniques may be chosen that minimize the skewness of the derivative of the rescaled waveforms, or enhance some other recognized metric, or combination of metrics, of signal quality. The techniques for adjusting the fractions, F1300,660 and F1300,890 may be selected based on their efficacy in reducing saturation or pulse rate errors in representative sets of oximetry data that include motion artifact.
An example of one technique for calculating F1300,660 and F1300,890, is to use the summations given below:
These summations may be adequately represented by the approximations shown below:
In one implementation using these summations, a value of 0.03 has been found to work well for ε. Alternatively, these summations may be approximated with infinite impulse response (IIR) filters. The values for F1300,660 and F1300,890 typically range from 0.6-0.9, and, in one embodiment, may be limited to range between 0.5-1.0 with a default value of 0.7. As will be understood by those skilled in the art, these constants may vary due to factors such as wavelength selection or sensor site or geometry.
As shown in
The improvements afforded by this technique are illustrated in the graph shown in
In a larger test, a test group of 10 subjects using the standard two wavelength algorithm showed a pooled root-mean-square-difference (RMSD) in oxygen saturation of 4.55%, with some periods of 25% errors, between the moving sensor and a non-moving control. In contrast, the same data processed by the three wavelength algorithm discussed above showed a RMSD of 2.61% for the pooled subjects.
The values calculated in the algorithm detailed above may be used in a number of ways to display more accurate information to the user, while minimizing the load on the processor. For example, turning back to
Additional useful modifications could take advantage of the extra signals provided by the technique. For example, additional preprocessing filters may be implemented prior to the calculation of the adjusted waveforms. In another example, various algorithms in the oximeter, such as sensor off detection, may continue to use the preprocessed plethysmographs 218, while the oxygen saturation and pulse rate calculation use the combined plethysmographs 228.
In addition, an alternative wavelength selection to the above-described augmentation to conventional pulse oximetry is an all-NIR pulse oximeter. An example of an all NIR oximeter is an oximeter employing light sources emitting at approximately 940, 1040, and 1180 nm used in conjunction with a single InGaAs detector. In addition to the advantage of requiring only one detector, the all-NIR implementation has advantages associated with the optical properties of tissue. The accuracy of measurements made using pulse oximetry depends, in part, on the extent to which the paths traveled by the different colors of light are the same. The mean path length and penetration depth of light at a particular wavelength traveling through tissue is strongly affected by the absorption and scattering coefficients of tissue at that wavelength. In conventional pulse oximetry, in order to achieve the same mean path length and penetration depth at two wavelengths, the scattering and absorption coefficients at the two wavelengths need to be matched. The scattering of light by tissue decreases rapidly as a function of wavelength, with the result that the scattering properties of tissue at approximately 940, 1040, and 1180 nm will be more closely matched than the scattering properties of tissue at a combination of both visible and NIR wavelengths such as approximately 660, 890, and 1180 nm, for reasons discussed below. The absorption properties of oxy- and deoxy-hemoglobin are such that at high oxygen saturation values the net (i.e., combined effects of oxy and deoxy) absorption coefficient due to hemoglobin will be matched reasonably well at 660 nm and 940 nm. However, as oxygen saturation values decrease, the high absorption coefficient of deoxy-hemoglobin at approximately 660 nm will result in an increasingly strong mismatch between the net absorption coefficient of hemoglobin at approximately 660 and approximately 940 nm. The net absorption coefficients of hemoglobin at approximately 940 and approximately 1040 nm, will be more closely matched than at approximately 660 and approximately 940 nm, over the full range of measurable oxygen saturation values.
The choice of the wavelength used to measure the motion-artifact signal depends partially on the need for matching the optical path length to that of the signals to be corrected. Beyond approximately 950 nm, the absorption coefficient of water, protein, and non-hemoglobin protein, in addition to that of hemoglobin needs to be considered in order to achieve close matching of path lengths. Although about 1300 nm is a currently preferred wavelength for measuring the motion-artifact signal, other alternative wavelength values are also effective, for example, wavelengths between approximately 1050 and 1400 nm and between approximately 1500 and 1850 nm.
The embodiments of the present technique may be practiced by placing the optical components directly at the tissue interface, or alternatively, by transporting the light to and from the tissue with fiber optics. The former implementation has the advantage of more efficient delivery and collection of the light, whereas the latter implementation has the advantages of being less costly. The less costly solution is enabled by the fact that when employing fiber optic delivery, the light sources and detectors can reside in the monitor as opposed to the sensor, and considering that such components may be more expensive that the fiber, this will result in a less expensive device.
As will be understood by those skilled in the art, other equivalent or alternative methods for the measurement of motion artifact signal associated with changes in tissue optical properties, and using the measurement to compensate plethysmographic measurements made at other wavelengths, according to the embodiments of the present technique can be envisioned without departing from the essential characteristics thereof. For example, a combination of visible and NIR or an all NIR wavelength combination may be used to make the measurements. Moreover, individuals skilled in the art of near-infrared spectroscopy would recognize that additional terms can be added to the algorithms used herein to incorporate reflectance measurements made at additional wavelengths and thus improve accuracy further. Also, light sources or light emission optics other then LED's including and not limited to incandescent light and narrowband light sources appropriately tuned to the desired wavelengths and associated light detection optics may be placed near the tissue location or may be positioned within a remote unit; and which deliver light to and receive light from the tissue location via optical fibers. Additionally, sensor arrangements functioning in a back-scattering or a reflection mode to make optical measurements of reflectances, as well as other embodiments, such as those working in a forward-scattering or a transmission mode may be used to make these measurements.
While the invention may be susceptible to various modifications and alternative forms, specific embodiments have been shown by way of example in the drawings and have been described in detail herein. However, it should be understood that the invention is not intended to be limited to the particular forms disclosed. Rather, the invention is to cover all modifications, equivalents, and alternatives falling within the spirit and scope of the invention as defined by the following appended claims.
This application is a continuation-in-part of the U.S. patent Ser. No. 10/797,475, entitled “PULSE OXIMETRY MOTION ARTIFACT REJECTION USING NEAR INFRARED ABSORPTION BY WATER”, filed Mar. 9, 2004 now U.S. Pat. No. 7,277,741, which is herein incorporated by reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3638640 | Shaw | Feb 1972 | A |
3998550 | Konishi et al. | Dec 1976 | A |
4066068 | Nilsson et al. | Jan 1978 | A |
4364008 | Jacques | Dec 1982 | A |
4711244 | Kuzara | Dec 1987 | A |
4714341 | Hamaguri et al. | Dec 1987 | A |
4723554 | Oman et al. | Feb 1988 | A |
4805623 | Jobsis | Feb 1989 | A |
4850365 | Rosenthal | Jul 1989 | A |
4860753 | Amerena | Aug 1989 | A |
4883055 | Merrick | Nov 1989 | A |
4907594 | Muz | Mar 1990 | A |
4911167 | Corenman et al. | Mar 1990 | A |
4936679 | Mersch | Jun 1990 | A |
4972331 | Chance | Nov 1990 | A |
5057695 | Hirao et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5086781 | Bookspan | Feb 1992 | A |
5111817 | Clark et al. | May 1992 | A |
5119815 | Chance | Jun 1992 | A |
5122974 | Chance | Jun 1992 | A |
5146091 | Knudson | Sep 1992 | A |
5167230 | Chance | Dec 1992 | A |
5224478 | Sakai et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
5277181 | Mendelson et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
5279295 | Martens et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
5282467 | Piantadosi et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
5297548 | Pologe | Mar 1994 | A |
5337745 | Benaron | Aug 1994 | A |
5337937 | Blank et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5348004 | Hollub | Sep 1994 | A |
5355880 | Thomas et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5372136 | Steuer et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5377674 | Kuestner | Jan 1995 | A |
5385143 | Aoyagi | Jan 1995 | A |
5431170 | Mathews | Jul 1995 | A |
5482036 | Diab et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5499627 | Steuer et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5553614 | Chance | Sep 1996 | A |
5564417 | Chance | Oct 1996 | A |
5575285 | Takanashi et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5615689 | Kotler | Apr 1997 | A |
5630413 | Thomas et al. | May 1997 | A |
5645059 | Fein et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5645060 | Yorkey | Jul 1997 | A |
5687721 | Kuhls | Nov 1997 | A |
5692503 | Kuenstner | Dec 1997 | A |
5701902 | Vari et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5720284 | Aoyagi et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5735284 | Tsoglin et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5747789 | Godik | May 1998 | A |
5755672 | Arai et al. | May 1998 | A |
5758644 | Diab et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5769785 | Diab et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5779631 | Chance | Jul 1998 | A |
5788643 | Feldman | Aug 1998 | A |
5803908 | Steuer et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5827181 | Dias et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5830139 | Abreu | Nov 1998 | A |
5833602 | Osemwota | Nov 1998 | A |
5842981 | Larsen et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5853364 | Baker, Jr. et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5860919 | Kiani-Azarbayjany et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5873821 | Chance et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5906582 | Kondo et al. | May 1999 | A |
5995856 | Mannheimer et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6011986 | Diab et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6064898 | Aldrich | May 2000 | A |
6120460 | Abreu | Sep 2000 | A |
6125297 | Siconolfi | Sep 2000 | A |
6134460 | Chance | Oct 2000 | A |
6149591 | Henderson et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6157850 | Diab et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6163715 | Larsen et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6178342 | Thompson et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6181958 | Steuer et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6222189 | Misner et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6230035 | Aoyagi et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6246894 | Steuer et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6266546 | Steuer et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6280396 | Clark et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6312393 | Abreu | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6336044 | Ghiassi et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6370426 | Campbell et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6397091 | Diab et al. | May 2002 | B2 |
6400971 | Finarov et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6402690 | Rhee et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6415236 | Kobayashi et al. | Jul 2002 | B2 |
6438399 | Kurth | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6442408 | Wenzel et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6466807 | Dobson et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6487439 | Skladnev et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6488677 | Bowman et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6501974 | Huiku | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6501975 | Diab et al. | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6512936 | Monfre et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6526301 | Larsen et al. | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6544193 | Abreu | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6546267 | Sugiura et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6549795 | Chance | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6591122 | Schmitt | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6592574 | Shimmick et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6594513 | Jobsis et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6600946 | Rice | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6606509 | Schmitt | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6615064 | Aldrich | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6622095 | Kobayashi et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6635491 | Khalil et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6636759 | Robinson | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6643543 | Takehara et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6654620 | Wu et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6658277 | Wasserman | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6662030 | Khalil et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6668181 | Wenzel et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6671526 | Aoyagi et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6671528 | Steuer et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6675029 | Monfre et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6678543 | Diab et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6687519 | Steuer et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6690958 | Walker et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6708048 | Chance | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6711424 | Fine et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6711425 | Reuss | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6777240 | Hazen et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6785568 | Chance | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6801797 | Mannheimer et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6801799 | Mendelson | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6849046 | Eyal-Bickels | Feb 2005 | B1 |
6873865 | Steuer et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6949081 | Chance | Sep 2005 | B1 |
6950699 | Manwaring et al. | Sep 2005 | B1 |
6961598 | Diab | Nov 2005 | B2 |
7006856 | Baker, Jr. et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7027849 | Al-Ali | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7039538 | Baker, Jr. | May 2006 | B2 |
7206621 | Aoyagi | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7209774 | Baker, Jr. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7215984 | Diab et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7215986 | Diab et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7236811 | Schmitt | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7239902 | Schmitt et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7277741 | Debreczeny et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7328053 | Diab et al. | Feb 2008 | B1 |
7376453 | Diab et al. | May 2008 | B1 |
7383070 | Diab et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7392075 | Baker, Jr. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
20010005773 | Larsen et al. | Jun 2001 | A1 |
20010020122 | Steuer et al. | Sep 2001 | A1 |
20010039376 | Steuer et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010044700 | Kobayashi et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020026106 | Khalil et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020035318 | Mannheimer et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020038079 | Steuer et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020042558 | Mendelson | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020049389 | Abreu | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020062071 | Diab et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020111748 | Kobayashi et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020133068 | Huiku | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020161287 | Schmitt | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020161290 | Chance | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020165439 | Schmitt | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020198443 | Ting | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030023140 | Chance | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030055324 | Wasserman | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030060693 | Monfre et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030139687 | Abreu | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030144584 | Mendelson | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030220548 | Schmitt | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030220576 | Diab | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040010188 | Wasserman | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040054270 | Pewzner et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040087846 | Wasserman | May 2004 | A1 |
20040107065 | Al-Ali | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040127779 | Steuer et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040171920 | Mannheimer et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040176670 | Takamura et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040176671 | Fine et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040230106 | Schmitt et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20050080323 | Kato | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050101850 | Parker | May 2005 | A1 |
20050107676 | Acosta et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050113656 | Chance | May 2005 | A1 |
20050168722 | Forstner et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050192488 | Bryenton et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050203357 | Debreczeny et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050209517 | Diab et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050267346 | Faber et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060009688 | Lamego et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060015021 | Cheng | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060020181 | Schmitt | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060030763 | Mannheimer et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060030764 | Porges et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060052680 | Diab | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060058683 | Chance | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060084864 | Schmitt et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060200014 | Fine et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060200016 | Diab et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060217609 | Diab et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060253016 | Baker, Jr. et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060287587 | Yarita | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060287588 | Yarita | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070106137 | Baker, Jr. et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070118027 | Baker, Jr. et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070129614 | Schmitt et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070225581 | Diab et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070249918 | Diab et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070291832 | Diab et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080004514 | Diab et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080009690 | Debreczeny et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080033266 | Diab et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080036752 | Diab et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080045823 | Diab et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080255436 | Baker | Oct 2008 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2353007 | Jun 2000 | CA |
19855521 | Jun 2000 | DE |
102 13 692 | Oct 2003 | DE |
1135184 | Jun 2000 | EP |
1184663 | Mar 2002 | EP |
2710517 | Apr 1995 | FR |
04-040940 | Feb 1992 | JP |
5-212016 | Aug 1993 | JP |
5-329163 | Dec 1993 | JP |
11-244266 | Sep 1999 | JP |
25095606 | Apr 2005 | JP |
WO 9220273 | Nov 1992 | WO |
WO 9403102 | Feb 1994 | WO |
WO 9749330 | Dec 1997 | WO |
WO 9834097 | Aug 1998 | WO |
WO 0032262 | Jun 2000 | WO |
WO 0071025 | Nov 2000 | WO |
WO 9313706 | Jan 2001 | WO |
WO 0116577 | Mar 2001 | WO |
WO 0145553 | Jun 2001 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20070106137 A1 | May 2007 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10797475 | Mar 2004 | US |
Child | 11521960 | US |