The present disclosure relates to patient monitors and medical ventilation.
Hospitals, nursing homes, and other patient care facilities typically include patient monitoring devices at one or more bedsides in the facility. Patient monitoring devices generally include sensors, processing equipment, and displays for obtaining and analyzing a patient's physiological parameters. Physiological parameters include, for example, blood pressure, respiratory rate, oxygen saturation (SpO2) level, other blood constitutions and combinations of constitutions, and pulse, among others. Clinicians, including doctors, nurses, and certain other caregiver personnel use the physiological parameters obtained from the patient to diagnose illnesses and to prescribe treatments. Clinicians can also use the physiological parameters to monitor a patient during various clinical situations to determine whether to increase the level of care given to the patient. Various patient monitoring devices are commercially available from Masimo Corporation (“Masimo”) of Irvine, Calif.
The present disclosure provides for the measurement, display and analysis of oxygenation saturation during the respiratory cycle. This advantageously allows a physician to monitor the amplitude of the difference between a low and high value in the patient's blood oxygen saturation over a respiration cycle. This advantageously allows a physician to determine whether adjustment of the ventilation parameters is desired.
In one embodiment, disclosed is a noninvasive method of analyzing the amplitude of the differences in oxygen saturation of a patient, the method comprising deriving oxygen saturation values from a patient the oxygen saturation values reflecting oxygenation saturation of the a tissue site and outputting an indication of the amplitude of the differences in the oxygen saturation values per respiratory cycle. The amplitude of the difference in the oxygen saturation may reflect a health status of the lungs of the patient. In an embodiment, the amplitude of the differences tracks the respiratory cycle.
The outputting of the indication of the amplitude of the amplitude of the differences may comprise outputting a graph of oxygen saturation values, or outputting a percentage value of variability. In one embodiment, a method is disclosed that determines whether the amplitude of the differences in oxygen saturation values is above a threshold value. In some embodiments, an alarm is generated in response to the variability being above the threshold value.
In some embodiments, control signals are provided to a ventilator responsive to the amplitude of the differences in oxygen saturation. The control signal may increase or decrease an FiO2, amount delivered by the ventilator to the patient. In some embodiments, the FiO2 amount is increased or decreased to keep the patient's oxygen saturation values on a steep part of a SpO2 versus FiO2 curve of the patient.
Also disclosed is a physiological monitoring system, the system comprising a physiological monitor with one or more processors configured to derive oxygen saturation values from a patient the oxygen saturation values corresponding to values of oxygen saturation in blood at a tissue site, and output an indication of the amplitude of the differences per respiratory cycle in the oxygen saturation values. The amplitude of the differences in the oxygen saturation may reflect a health status of the lungs of the patient or track a respiratory cycle of the patient.
In some embodiments the physiological monitor is further configured to output the indication of amplitude of the differences by at least outputting a graph of oxygen saturation values or a percentage value of amplitude of the differences. The monitor may be configured to determine whether the amplitude of the differences in the oxygen saturation is above a threshold value. The physiological monitor may be further configured to generate an alarm in response to the amplitude of the differences being above the threshold value. In some embodiments, the physiological monitor may be further configured to derive the oxygen saturation values from a physiological signal obtained by a noninvasive optical sensor.
Medical ventilators are often used to assist patients with breathing. Ventilators can deliver oxygen into a patient's lungs and control the removal of carbon dioxide. Ventilators typically include different settings or parameters that can be adjusted to provide an appropriate amount of ventilation to a patient. These parameters might include, for example, pressure, volume of air provided, and respiration rate. An artisan will recognize from the disclosure herein a wide variety of commercially available ventilator systems, other ventilator systems, and characteristics of ventilator systems known to the ventilator device community.
Significant damage can occur to the lungs, and in particular, to the alveoli structures in the lungs, when ventilation parameters are not appropriate. For instance, too much volume can cause the delicate alveoli to stretch and then collapse, causing injury to the lungs and pulmonary failure. To avoid this problem, clinicians adjust the ventilation to reduce the distention and collapse the alveoli to prevent lung injury. Thus, a clinician often tries to balance the several ventilation parameters to avoid serious lung damage while providing sufficient air to a patient but not have the alveoli collapse.
This disclosure describes certain systems and methods for indicating when clinicians should consider adjusting ventilation parameters of a medical ventilator. In certain embodiments, a physiological monitor measures at least a patient's blood oxygen saturation noninvasively. The physiological monitor may provide an indication of the amplitude of the difference between a low and high value in the patient's blood oxygen saturation over a predetermined time and/or respiration cycle. A clinician may infer from the indication of the amplitude of the difference of oxygen saturation measurements that adjustment of the ventilation parameters is desired. In response to the clinician adjusting the parameters properly, the amplitude of the differences of the oxygen saturation may advantageously decrease, thereby stabilizing the patient's oxygen and finding the foregoing balance that can ensure proper lung ventilator interactions. The amplitude indication can therefore provide the clinician with feedback that can help advantageously reduce the risk of lung failure.
In the depicted embodiment, the patient 102 is receiving breathing assistance from a ventilator 150. The patient 102 could receive air from the ventilator 150 through a face mask, intubation tube, or the like. The ventilator 150 may include controls that allow adjustment of ventilation parameters such as inspiratory pressure, air volume, desired respiratory rate, end-expiratory pressure (PEEP), inspiration: expiration ratio (I:E), Fraction of Inspired Oxygen (FiO2), tidal volume (TV), and the like.
The patient 102 is also being monitored by a noninvasive sensor 110. The sensor 110 can be an optical sensor that irradiates a tissue site of the patient 102 with one or more wavelengths of optical radiation. The sensor 110 can detect radiation transmitted through the tissue site of the patient and provide an absorption signal 112 to a physiological monitor 120.
The physiological monitor 120 may have one or more processors that can analyze the absorption signal 112 to determine one or more blood constituents of the patient 102, such as blood oxygen saturation. The physiological monitor 120 can measure oxygen saturation values. The oxygen saturation values measured by the physiological monitor 120 can be somewhat averaged over a respiratory cycle. In other words, in certain embodiments, a shorter averaging time is applied to the oxygen saturation values so as to obtain oxygen saturation values that more closely track actual or instantaneous oxygen saturation over a respiratory cycle. In other embodiments, the physiological monitor 120 does not apply any averaging to the oxygen saturation values.
Advantageously, in certain embodiments, the physiological monitor 120 detects the amplitude of the difference between the highest and lowest oxygen saturation measurements over a set amount of time. Increases and decreases in the oxygen saturation can track or approximately track the patient's 102 respiratory cycle (e.g., a cycle of recruitment and collapse of alveoli). The magnitude of the differences in the oxygen saturation values over time can reflect the degree of recruitment and collapse of alveoli in the respiratory cycle. The physiological monitor 120 can calculate the amplitude of the difference of the lowest and highest values from the set of values included in a window defined by the peak-to-peak oxygen saturation amplitudes with each respiratory cycle or with a selection of respiratory cycles.
In some patients, such as in a ventilated patient 102, high amplitude of differences of oxygen saturation over each respiratory cycle can reflect overextension of the alveoli of the lungs. This overextension may be caused by too much air pressure or volume followed by too little air pressure or volume. A normal or healthy amplitude of the differences between oxygen saturation high and low values may be, for example, about 2% to about 3% or less, about 1% to about 2% or less, or the like. An amplitude of differences between high and low values that can reflect a risk of lung damage might be greater than about 2% to about 3%, greater than about 4% to about 5%, or the like. Normal and abnormal ranges of the amplitude of oxygen saturation differences can depend on the age of the patient (e.g., neonate versus child versus adult), the gender of the patient, comorbidity of the patient, and the like. When the foregoing measurements show greater amplitude of differences than discussed, particularly when the increases and decreases in oxygen saturation tracks or substantially tracks each respiratory cycle, then ventilation adjustment may advantageously reduce the amplitude of the difference between the high and low values over a respiratory cycle.
The physiological monitor 120 can advantageously provide an indication of the amplitude of the difference in oxygen saturation over a respiratory cycles for presentation to the care provider 130. For example, the physiological monitor 120 can display oxygen saturation values, an oxygen saturation graph, an amplitude of the differences indicator, combinations of the same, or the like. In some implementations, the physiological monitor 120 outputs an audio and/or visual alarm that alerts the care provider 130 to high amplitude of differences in oxygen saturation high and low values over respiratory cycles. Example monitor 120 displays are described below with respect to
The care provider 130 can use the information provided by the physiological monitor 120 to determine whether to adjust settings 142 of the ventilator 150. For example, the care provider 130 could adjust one or more of air pressure, air volume, respiratory rate, end-expiratory pressure (PEEP), inspiration: expiration ratio (I:E), FiO2, tidal volume (TV), and the like. In one scenario, if the amplitude of the differences between the high and low values over a respiratory cycle is too high, the care provider 130 might reduce the air pressure and/or air volume provided by the ventilator 150 while increasing the respiratory rate to provide the patient 102 with sufficient air. Adjusting the ventilation parameters could cause the amplitude of the differences in the oxygen saturation to decrease with each respiratory cycle from the previous high amplitude. The physiological monitor 120 could output an indication of the decreased amplitude. The care provider 130 could continue to adjust the ventilation parameters until the physiological monitor 120 reflects a reduced or minimized amplitude of the differences.
In alternative embodiments, the physiological monitor 120 can provide a control signal 126 directly to the ventilator 150 based at least partly on the detected amplitude of the differences in oxygen saturation. The control signal 126 can cause the ventilator 150 to automatically adjust one or more of the ventilation parameters described above. Alternatively, the control signal 126 can cause the ventilator 150 to alarm or to display a recommendation to adjust ventilation parameters on a display of the ventilator 150, as opposed to fully controlling the ventilator 150. The physiological monitor 120 can generate this control signal 126 instead of or in addition to providing a saturation value, oxygen saturation graph, indicator, alarm, or the like.
A visual oxygen saturation alarm 220 is also shown. The oxygen saturation alarm 220 includes text that indicates that the oxygen saturation amplitude of differences is high. The oxygen saturation alarm 220 may be displayed, for example, when a patient's oxygen saturation amplitude of differences increases above a threshold value. The visual oxygen saturation alarm 220 may be accompanied by or be replaced by an audio alarm in certain embodiments. The visual oxygen saturation alarm 220 and/or audible alarm may indicate to a care provider that adjustment to ventilation parameters is desired.
The example display 202 depicted in
The signal 310 with higher amplitude of differences between maximum and minimum values of oxygen saturation over a respiratory cycle can reflect a stressed condition of the patient's lungs, caused by ventilation that is too extreme. In response to observing the high amplitude of the differences between the high and low values in the signal 310, a care giver could adjust ventilator parameters as described above. In response, the care giver could adjust the ventilation parameters as needed to maintain a lower amplitude of differences in the signal 320.
In an embodiment, one ventilation parameter a caregiver may monitor and adjust to maintain a desired amplitude of the differences in the percentage of oxygen saturation over a respiratory cycle or cycles is the fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2). The gases provided to the patient through a ventilator 150 (ventilation gases) may be composed of the types and percentages of gases found in ambient air, or may have different amounts of types of gases. For example, the percentage of oxygen a patient breathes in through a ventilator may be called the fraction of inspired oxygen, or FiO2. Specifically, increased FiO2 may be administered in order to maintain a patient's oxygen saturation within certain ranges.
In order for a caregiver to maintain adequate oxygen saturation by maintaining an appropriate FiO2 to a patient, the oxygen saturation can be monitored according to the methods disclosed herein and the FiO2 can be adjusted accordingly.
When the partial pressure of oxygen in the blood reaches about 90 mmHg, the oxygen saturation of the hemoglobin will plateau at 100 percent oxygen saturation. If the partial pressure of oxygen in the blood is increased to about 90 mmHg, the oxygen saturation will stay 100 percent saturated, and will not increase as no more oxygen may bind to the hemoglobin. This leaves a large range of partial pressures of oxygen dissolved in the blood that will result in an oxygen saturation of the hemoglobin at 100 percent. Therefore, this illustrates that the partial pressure of oxygen in the blood will affect the oxygen saturation of the hemoglobin.
Therefore, a caregiver may control the partial pressure of oxygen in the blood in order to manipulate or control the oxygen saturation of the hemoglobin. One way to do this is to manipulate the FiO2 or fraction of inspired oxygen to a patient. When a caregiver increases the fraction of inspired oxygen to a patient, the partial pressure of oxygen in the alveolar sacs will increase. This will cause more of the oxygen in the lungs to be dissolved into the blood of the arteries, which may or may not bind to hemoglobin, depending on the SpO2 level. Similarly, if a caregiver decreases the fraction of inspired oxygen the partial pressure of oxygen in the blood will decrease.
A caregiver may only change or manipulate the SpO2 or oxygen saturation of the hemoglobin, if the partial pressure of oxygen is low enough so that the oxygen saturation is less than 100 percent saturated. Otherwise if the SpO2 is 100 percent, and the partial pressure of the oxygen in a patient's blood is on the flat portion of the graph marked 420, changes in the partial pressure of oxygen dissolved in the blood will have no effect on the SpO2 and therefore changes in the FiO2 or the fraction of oxygen inspired by a patient will not effect or change the level of SpO2. Similarly if the patient's PO2 is in the range marked 420, the patient's SpO2 will remain constant, and therefore changes in the SpO2 due to the respiratory cycle (or other non-FiO2 related changes) will not be observable.
Therefore, in order to utilize FiO2 to control SpO2 the FiO2 must be decreased until the SpO2 levels fall below 100 percent. This will place the SpO2 on the portion of the graph marked 410 where changes in the FiO2 will produce changes in the SpO2 of a patient. This will allow a caregiver to monitor the changes in the SpO2 levels and adjust the levels by changing the FiO2 that is delivered to a patient.
In an embodiment, in order limit the amplitude in the difference of the SpO2 over the course of the respiration cycle, it may be advantageous to control the FiO2 delivered to a patient on the ventilator 150 so that it corresponds or stays within the range of the FiO2 values on the part of the slope of the graph marked 410 in
Additional embodiments of using pulse oximetry to adjust ventilator parameters are described in the attached Appendices, which is to be considered a part of this application.
Conditional language used herein, such as, among others, “can,” “could,” “might,” “may,” “e.g.,” and the like, unless specifically stated otherwise, or otherwise understood within the context as used, is generally intended to convey that certain embodiments may include, while other embodiments may not include, certain features, elements and/or steps. Thus, such conditional language is not generally intended to imply that features, elements and/or steps are in any way required for one or more embodiments or that one or more embodiments necessarily include logic for deciding, with or without user input or prompting, whether these features, elements and/or steps are included or are to be performed in any particular embodiment.
Depending on the embodiment, certain acts, events, or functions of any of the methods described herein can be performed in a different sequence, may be added, merged, or left out all together (e.g., not all described acts or events are necessary for the practice of the method). Moreover, in certain embodiments, acts or events may be performed concurrently, e.g., through multi-threaded processing, interrupt processing, or multiple processors or processor cores, rather than sequentially.
The various illustrative logical blocks, modules, circuits, and algorithm steps described in connection with the embodiments disclosed herein may be implemented as electronic hardware, computer software, or combinations of both. To clearly illustrate this interchangeability of hardware and software, various illustrative components, blocks, modules, circuits, and steps have been described above generally in terms of their functionality. Whether such functionality is implemented as hardware or software depends upon the particular application and design constraints imposed on the overall system. The described functionality may be implemented in varying ways for each particular application, but such implementation decisions should not be interpreted as causing a departure from the scope of the disclosure.
While the above detailed description has shown, described, and pointed out novel features as applied to various embodiments, it will be understood that various omissions, substitutions, and changes in the form and details of the device or process illustrated may be made without departing from the spirit of the disclosure. As will be recognized, certain embodiments of the inventions described herein may be embodied within a form that does not provide all of the features and benefits set forth herein, as some features may be used or practiced separately from others. The scope of certain inventions disclosed herein is indicated by the appended claims rather than by the foregoing description. All changes which come within the meaning and range of equivalency of the claims are to be embraced within their scope.
This application claims priority benefit under 35 U.S.C. §119(e) of U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/222,087 filed Jun. 30, 2009, entitled “Pulse Oximetry System for Adjusting Medical Ventilation.” The present application incorporates the disclosure of the foregoing application herein by reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4960128 | Gordon et al. | Oct 1990 | A |
4964408 | Hink et al. | Oct 1990 | A |
5041187 | Hink et al. | Aug 1991 | A |
5069213 | Polczynski | Dec 1991 | A |
5163438 | Gordon et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
5278627 | Aoyagi et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
5337744 | Branigan | Aug 1994 | A |
5341805 | Stavridi et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
D353195 | Savage et al. | Dec 1994 | S |
D353196 | Savage et al. | Dec 1994 | S |
5377676 | Vari et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
D359546 | Savage et al. | Jun 1995 | S |
5431170 | Mathews | Jul 1995 | A |
D361840 | Savage et al. | Aug 1995 | S |
D362063 | Savage et al. | Sep 1995 | S |
5452717 | Branigan et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
D363120 | Savage et al. | Oct 1995 | S |
5456252 | Vari et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5482036 | Diab et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5490505 | Diab et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5494043 | O'Sullivan et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5533511 | Kaspari et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5561275 | Savage et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5562002 | Lalin | Oct 1996 | A |
5590649 | Caro et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5602924 | Durand et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5632272 | Diab et al. | May 1997 | A |
5638816 | Kiani-Azarbayjany et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5638818 | Diab et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5645440 | Tobler et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5680857 | Pelikan et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5685299 | Diab et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
D393830 | Tobler et al. | Apr 1998 | S |
5743262 | Lepper, Jr. et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5758644 | Diab et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5760910 | Lepper, Jr. et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5769785 | Diab et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5782757 | Diab et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5785659 | Caro et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5791347 | Flaherty et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5810734 | Caro et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5823950 | Diab et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5830131 | Caro et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5833618 | Caro et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5860919 | Kiani-Azarbayjany et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5890929 | Mills et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5904654 | Wohltmann et al. | May 1999 | A |
5919134 | Diab | Jul 1999 | A |
5934925 | Tobler et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5940182 | Lepper, Jr. et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5995855 | Kiani et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5997343 | Mills et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6002952 | Diab et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6011986 | Diab et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6027452 | Flaherty et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6036642 | Diab et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6045509 | Caro et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6067462 | Diab et al. | May 2000 | A |
6081735 | Diab et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6088607 | Diab et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6110522 | Lepper, Jr. et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6124597 | Shehada | Sep 2000 | A |
6144868 | Parker | Nov 2000 | A |
6151516 | Kiani-Azarbayjany et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6152754 | Gerhardt et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6157850 | Diab et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6165005 | Mills et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6184521 | Coffin, IV et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6206830 | Diab et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6229856 | Diab et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6232609 | Snyder et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6236872 | Diab et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6241683 | Macklem et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6256523 | Diab et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6263222 | Diab et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6278522 | Lepper, Jr. et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6280213 | Tobler et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6285896 | Tobler et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6321100 | Parker | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6334065 | Al-Ali et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6343224 | Parker | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6349228 | Kiani et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6360114 | Diab et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6368283 | Xu et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6371921 | Caro et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6377829 | Al-Ali | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6388240 | Schulz et al. | May 2002 | B2 |
6397091 | Diab et al. | May 2002 | B2 |
6430525 | Weber et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6463311 | Diab | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6470199 | Kopotic et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6501975 | Diab et al. | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6505059 | Kollias et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6515273 | Al-Ali | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6519487 | Parker | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6525386 | Mills et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6526300 | Kiani et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6541756 | Schulz et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6542764 | Al-Ali et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6580086 | Schulz et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6584336 | Ali et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6595316 | Cybulski et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6597932 | Tian et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6597933 | Kiani et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6606511 | Ali et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6632181 | Flaherty et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6639668 | Trepagnier | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6640116 | Diab | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6643530 | Diab et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6650917 | Diab et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6654624 | Diab et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6658276 | Kianl et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6661161 | Lanzo et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6671531 | Al-Ali et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6678543 | Diab et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6684090 | Ali et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6684091 | Parker | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6697656 | Al-Ali | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6697657 | Shehada et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6697658 | Al-Ali | Feb 2004 | B2 |
RE38476 | Diab et al. | Mar 2004 | E |
6699194 | Diab et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6714804 | Al-Ali et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
RE38492 | Diab et al. | Apr 2004 | E |
6721582 | Trepagnier et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6721585 | Parker | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6725075 | Al-Ali | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6728560 | Kollias et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6735459 | Parker | May 2004 | B2 |
6745060 | Diab et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6760607 | Al-Ali | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6770028 | Ali et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6771994 | Kiani et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6792300 | Diab et al. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6813511 | Diab et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6816741 | Diab | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6822564 | Al-Ali | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6826419 | Diab et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6830711 | Mills et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6850787 | Weber et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6850788 | Al-Ali | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6852083 | Caro et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6861639 | Al-Ali | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6898452 | Al-Ali et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6920345 | Al-Ali et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6931268 | Kiani-Azarbayjany et al. | Aug 2005 | B1 |
6934570 | Kiani et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6939305 | Flaherty et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6943348 | Coffin, IV | Sep 2005 | B1 |
6950687 | Al-Ali | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6961598 | Diab | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6970792 | Diab | Nov 2005 | B1 |
6979812 | Al-Ali | Dec 2005 | B2 |
6985764 | Mason et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6993371 | Kiani et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6996427 | Ali et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
6999904 | Weber et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7003338 | Weber et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7003339 | Diab et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7008380 | Rees et al. | Mar 2006 | B1 |
7015451 | Dalke et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7024233 | Ali et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7027849 | Al-Ali | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7030749 | Al-Ali | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7039449 | Al-Ali | May 2006 | B2 |
7041060 | Flaherty et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7044918 | Diab | May 2006 | B2 |
7067893 | Mills et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7096052 | Mason et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7096054 | Abdul-Hafiz et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7132641 | Schulz et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7142901 | Kiani et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7149561 | Diab | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7186966 | Al-Ali | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7190261 | Al-Ali | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7215984 | Diab | May 2007 | B2 |
7215986 | Diab | May 2007 | B2 |
7221971 | Diab | May 2007 | B2 |
7225006 | Al-Ali et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7225007 | Al-Ali | May 2007 | B2 |
RE39672 | Shehada et al. | Jun 2007 | E |
7239905 | Kiani-Azarbayjany et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7245953 | Parker | Jul 2007 | B1 |
7254429 | Schurman et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7254431 | Al-Ali | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7254433 | Diab et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7254434 | Schulz et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7272425 | Al-Ali | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7274955 | Kiani et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
D554263 | Al-Ali | Oct 2007 | S |
7280858 | Al-Ali et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7289835 | Mansfield et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7292883 | De Felice et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7295866 | Al-Ali | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7328053 | Diab et al. | Feb 2008 | B1 |
7332784 | Mills et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7340287 | Mason et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7341559 | Schulz et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7343186 | Lamego et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
D566282 | Al-Ali et al. | Apr 2008 | S |
7355512 | Al-Ali | Apr 2008 | B1 |
7356365 | Schurman | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7371981 | Abdul-Hafiz | May 2008 | B2 |
7373193 | Al-Ali et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7373194 | Weber et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7376453 | Diab et al. | May 2008 | B1 |
7377794 | Al Ali et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7377899 | Weber et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7383070 | Diab et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7415297 | Al-Ali et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7428432 | Ali et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7438683 | Al-Ali et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7440787 | Diab | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7454240 | Diab et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7467002 | Weber et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7469157 | Diab et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7471969 | Diab et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7471971 | Diab et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7483729 | Al-Ali et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7483730 | Diab et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7489958 | Diab et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7496391 | Diab et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7496393 | Diab et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
D587657 | Al-Ali et al. | Mar 2009 | S |
7499741 | Diab et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7499835 | Weber et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7500950 | Al-Ali et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7509154 | Diab et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7509494 | Al-Ali | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7510849 | Schurman et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7526328 | Diab et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7530942 | Diab | May 2009 | B1 |
7530949 | Al Ali et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
7530955 | Diab et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
7563110 | Al-Ali et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7596398 | Al-Ali et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7618375 | Flaherty | Nov 2009 | B2 |
D606659 | Kiani et al. | Dec 2009 | S |
7647083 | Al-Ali et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
D609193 | Al-Ali et al. | Feb 2010 | S |
D614305 | Al-Ali et al. | Apr 2010 | S |
RE41317 | Parker | May 2010 | E |
20040116784 | Gavish | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20060281983 | Al-Ali et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20080188760 | Al-Ali et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20100331639 A1 | Dec 2010 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61222087 | Jun 2009 | US |