The invention relates generally to the field of laser systems that generate ultra short laser pulses. The system uses an electro-optic device (such as a Pockels cell) installed in the cavity of a regenerative amplifier for generating a train of amplified optical pulses or pulse burst with a predetermined burst repetition rate. The regenerative amplifier comprises the same or additional one or more electro-optic devices built into the cavity for minimizing the pulse-to-pulse amplitude variation during a burst at the output of the amplifier. A related regenerative amplifier design can be used to extend the available maximum repetition rate of amplified optical pulses.
Laser oscillators of various types, e.g. solid state, fiber, gas, dye etc., can generate pulses with femtosecond to several tens of picoseconds duration. The pulse repetition rate from these devices depends on the cavity length and is usually in the several MHz to GHz range. Since the average output power of these types of pulsed laser sources is a few tens to a few hundred mW the single pulse energy falls in the range of a few nJ to a few hundred nJ.
Many applications such as medical, laser machining, laser marking and cutting, require orders of magnitude higher energy/pulse. The pulse energy from the above mentioned type of oscillators is restricted, in some cases by nonlinear effects such as self phase modulation or self focusing in other cases by the limited amount of available pump power.
As a consequence several amplifier schemes were developed for boosting the energy/pulse up to the mJ range or higher. In a typical setup a laser pulse is coupled into an amplifier cavity and switched out after more than one roundtrip. For femtosecond and picosecond pulses the chirped pulse amplification (CPA) system was suggested by Strickland and Mourou in “Compression of amplified chirped optical pulses”, Optics Communications, Vol. 56 No. 3, Dec. 1, 1985 or P. Maine and G. Mourou in “Amplification of 1-nsec pulses in Nd:glass followed by compression to 1 psec”, Optics Letters, Vol. 13, No. 6, June 1988, and is now a concept well known to a skilled person. Both documents are incorporated by reference.
In a CPA system the usual first amplifier stage, following pulse stretching, is the regenerative amplifier RA. While the detailed operation of the regenerative amplifier is well known, the operation of this device is disclosed in more detail since it is intimately related to the invention. The regenerative amplifier RA is a closed laser cavity while the selected pulse is being amplified, has the largest amplification factor (3-4 orders of magnitude) and usually has the highest number of roundtrips among the amplifier stages of a CPA laser system. Therefore the regenerative amplifier is expected to “regenerate” the TEM00 spatial mode of the oscillator OSC that may have been degraded in the pulse stretcher STR. The regenerative amplifier RA may be followed by one or more further amplifier stages FA
As shown for a simple setup in
b shows the typical evolution of peak power inside the amplifier as a function of time. The captured pulse 1b is circulating with the roundtrip time TN in the regenerative amplifier and is being amplified at each pass through the gain medium. The corresponding pulse envelope 7 increases to a saturation level that designates the maximum of amplification in the regenerative amplifier setup.
The peak power limitation of the pulse rejected from a well designed regenerative amplifier is determined by the damage thresholds of the optical elements of this amplifier stage.
There are applications in which a short train or burst of amplified pulses is more desirable than a single amplified pulse, e.g. as disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 6,552,301 which is incorporated by reference.
It is also expected that the extractable amount of energy from the regenerative amplifier can be increased if this energy is distributed over several pulses emitted from the amplifier that are more than 10-15 ns apart.
The temporal separation of the pulses in the pulse train or burst is equal to the roundtrip time of the regenerative amplifier. Such train of output pulses can be obtained from a regenerative amplifier if the rejection of the amplified pulse is not full but partial. Such partial rejection of pulse energy from the regenerative amplifier can be obtained by the proper selection of polarization rotation, i.e., by applying the appropriate potential difference to the Pockels cell. In this case a predetermined number of amplified pulses can be obtained.
The invention is concerned about the way such train or burst of amplified pulses can be obtained from the regenerative amplifier and about the pulse-to-pulse stability that can be achieved in one such train.
A further problem that the invention is concerned about is to provide a setup that can generate amplified pulses with very high repetition rate, i.e. above repetition rates that are accessible by a single Pockels cell switch.
In order to solve the problems the inventive concept basically uses the electro-optic device (e.g. the Pockels cell) that is already part of the regenerative amplifier for producing the above described train of pulses. An additional number of similar electro-optic devices can be mounted inside the regenerative amplifier for special purposes such as achieving better pulse-to-pulse stability within a burst or controlling the envelope of the pulse train (burst)
a and b show an example of the time dependent operation of a high-voltage driver connected to the Pockels cell 4a for producing the optical pulse burst. The basic control principles of Pockels cells 4a for operating in a laser system are disclosed in US 2004/0101001 which is incorporated by reference.
τ=CPC·R
with CPC as the capacitance of the Pockels cell and adjustable R. Two capacitors 11a and 11b may be used in addition for modifying the potential difference function on the Pockels cell.
a and 6b show a similar operation with two Pockels cells as first and second electro-optic modulators 4a and 4b.
The option of using two Pockels cells 4a and 4b in the regenerative amplifier, in the general sense of amplified pulse train forming, extends the maximum available amplified pulse repetition rate from the CPA laser system by a factor of two. The maximum available pulse repetition rate in a reasonably high gain regenerative amplifier is determined by the highest switching frequency of the Pockels cell driver in the control element. Repetition rate doubling of the amplified pulses can be achieved by using the two Pockels cells so that they switch pulses in and out of the regenerative amplifier alternatively. The resulted composite pulse repetition rate depends on the precision of the timing adjustment between the two Pockels cell drivers.
a shows the schematic setup of this solution with two Pockels cells 4a and 4b and corresponding switches SW1 and SW2. In this example HU1, HU2 and HU(λ/4) are set equal. Further extension of this setup by using 3, 4, or more Pockels cells as well as further switches can lead to pulse repetition rate tripling quadrupling etc. This method is of course limited by the introduction of losses in the regenerative amplifier cavity at the installation of each additional Pockels cell as well as economical considerations related to the complexity of the system.
The time dependent operation of switches and Pockels cells and the caused dumping of output pulses 1c are shown in
The following is a description of the effect of polarization rotation characteristics of the Pockels cell on the stability or pulse-to-pulse peak power variation of the amplified pulses rejected from the regenerative amplifier.
It is assumed that the potential difference on the Pockels cell can be adjusted to follow various mathematical functions and that HV steps can be applied to the electrodes of the Pockels cell with a few nanoseconds rise and fall times. It is also assumed that each electrode of a Pockels cell can be connected to several voltage generators or to ground through independent fast electrical switches. For modelling the behaviour of the regenerative amplifier realistic values of roundtrip gain and loss found in a solid state regenerative amplifier as well as a realistic value for the initial energy/pulse circulating in the amplifier are assumed.
The calculated results of pulse-to-pulse peak power fluctuation in two examples of Pockels cell switching designs are presented in
a shows the output coupling function from the regenerative amplifier cavity while 7b shows the result for a burst obtained with an RC-element, 2 high voltage steps and gate opening and complete cavity dumping on the Pockels cell. The equations and parameters are set as shown below.
The output coupling as a function of Pockels cell voltage (the usual sinˆ2 function of a Pockels cell switch and a polarizer):
where A1, A2, . . . are high voltage amplitudes, Φ(n−N) is the Heaviside function, τ is the time constant of the RC decay n is the number of roundtrips in the regenerative amplifier cavity and N is the highest number of pulses that can be obtained with the model.
The normalized power of the coupled out pulse is described by:
where E_ic is proportional to the input power, L and G are the losses and the gain in the regenerative amplifier respectively.
With the normalized input power and gain function:
In the model the following values were taken (others can be also used that will result in different pulse burst length, different pulse-to-pulse stability etc.)
N=50
τ=70
L=0.04
N1=1
N2=8
N3=10
A1=0.33
A2=0.17
A3=0.88
n=1,2 . . . N
The model predicts the possibility of having a +/−20% maximum peak power variation between the amplified pulses in one burst in case one high voltage value on one of the electrodes of the Pockels cell follows an exponential decay function.
a shows the out coupling function from the regenerative amplifier and 8b show a burst produced with 6 high voltage steps and complete cavity dumping on the Pockels cell. If the potential difference across the Pockels cell varies in discrete steps of predetermined amplitude an approximately +/−25% fluctuation can be achieved with 4 steps (inclusive final switch out of the pulse) while the fluctuation is reduced to about +/−15% if 6 steps are employed.
The equations and parameters are set as shown below (the notation is the same as for the model calculation above):
with
and
N=50
L=0.04
N1=1
N2=4
N3=6
N4=8
N5=9
N6=10
A1=0.35
A2=0.06
A3=0.08
A4=0.12
A5=0.18
A6=0.8
n=1,2 . . . N
As shown in
a shows the layout of such a pulse train generator with a first mirror 2a and a second mirror 2b forming the cavity, a thin-film polarizer and a quarter-wave plate 5. The in-and out-coupling of laser pulses LP is controlled by the operation of the first Pockels cell 4a and the second Pockels cell 4b. The first Pockels cell 4a and the second Pockels cell 4b are operated as first and second electro-optic modulators forming an electro-optic switch 4 for switching the pulse in and out from the cavity. More than 2 Pockels cell can also be used. The electro-optic modulators are time-asynchronously operated, e.g. in an alternating manner. The overall behaviour is similar to an electro-optic switch with increased switching speed.
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60587547 | Jul 2004 | US |