Pulse width adaptation for inductive links

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 9795794
  • Patent Number
    9,795,794
  • Date Filed
    Wednesday, July 30, 2008
    16 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, October 24, 2017
    7 years ago
Abstract
A signal processor is described for communication with an implanted medical device. An external processor transmits to the implanted medical device an implant data signal having a sequence of HI and LOW logic states at a fixed data bit rate. The pulse width durations of the HI and LOW logic states is adjustable in response to feedback telemetry data from the implantable medical device.
Description
FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The present invention relates to digital data and energy transmission methods for use with implantable medical devices, and more specifically, to signal conditioning of the data signal to be more robust against random variations and unknown parameters.


BACKGROUND ART

Many implantable medical devices receive an externally generated data signal which may also act as the source of electrical power for the implant. Typically, data signals are transferred in such systems using Near Field Communication (NFC) in the high-frequency (HF) radio frequency (RF) band (3-30 MHz) over an electromagnetic field induction link. For example, a magnetic field induction (MFI) link can transmit and receive data between an external signal processor and the implanted device based on transformer-type induction between two aligned coils—one external and one internal.


The external signal processor in such applications can be thought of as a self powered initiator (e.g., by batteries), where the implanted device is a non-self powered target device that is remotely powered through the MFI link by extracting electrical energy from the transmitted RF data signal. The implanted device can answer to an external command to provide telemetry feedback data, for example, by load modulation of the transmitted signal by the implanted device. A telemetry circuit in the external signal processor then can demodulate this load-modulated RF feedback signal.


Digital data transmission generally occurs at a fixed data bit rate of some R bits/second. FIG. 1 shows the simple case of data bits as logic ONEs and ZEROs (possibly encoded) which are transmitted from the initiator device to the target device using on-off keying (OOK) modulation (which is a special case of amplitude shift-keying (ASK)). As seen in the bottom of FIG. 1, the RF carrier signal is a sinusoid wave with a fundamental frequency (fc) typically in the HF band. Data bit rates are typically less than or equal to fc/10 bits per second. Under low power constraints, a non-linear power amplifier (PA) such as a Class E amplifier modulates and amplifies the baseband signal at the initiator device producing the waveform shown at the bottom of FIG. 1. Demodulation and detection of the modulated OOK signal takes place at the target device to produce the signal shown at the top of FIG. 1.


Under low-complexity constraints, demodulation and detection make use of non-coherent schemes. That is, in contrast to coherent schemes based on phase-locked loops (PLLs) and Costas loops which are relatively complex to implement, in non-coherent approaches demodulation is performed without recovering the rf carrier and detection is performed without recovering the original timing. In the example shown in FIG. 1, the baseband signal is Manchester encoded so that a positive (negative) transition signifies a logic ONE (ZERO), and there is a signal transition at mid-bit. Note that independent of the bit stream and inherent to Manchester encodings, only two states are visible: either a double-wide HI (double-wide LO) or a single-wide HI (single-wide LO).


Low-complexity detection methods are commonly used which are based on asynchronous over-sampling and counting (O&C) algorithms, but these are not very robust against variations. In asynchronous over-sampling, the demodulated signal is sampled at some kR samples per second (k is usually a number greater than 3) by a clock unrelated to the encoder clock (no frequency or phase relationship between the clocks is imposed). The counting algorithm counts the samples in a HI (LO) state and decides based on a fixed decision interval (i.e. a discrete set of integers) whether the current count signifies a double-wide HI (double-wide LO) or a single-wide HI (single-wide LO). Decoding into a logic ONE/ZERO stream (i.e. a non-return to zero stream, NRZ stream) follows straightforwardly. Data detection is discussed at greater length in the following: U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,741,314; 6,600,955; 4,361,895; and U.S. Pat. No. 6,628,212; the contents of which are incorporated herein by reference.


SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

Embodiments of the present invention are directed to a signal processor for communication with an implanted medical device. An external processor transmits to the implanted medical device an implant data signal having a sequence of HI and LOW logic states at a fixed data bit rate. The pulse width durations of the HI and LOW logic states is adjustable in response to feedback telemetry data from the implantable medical device.


In specific embodiments, the external processor may use an electromagnetic field induction link for transmitting a high-frequency band radio frequency between 3 MHz and 30 MHz. The implant data signal may be encoded using Manchester data encoding. The adjustable pulse width durations may be selectable from a group of pre-determined pulse width durations.


In any of the above embodiments, the implanted medical device may be a cochlear implant device.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIG. 1 shows data transmission in an NFC system as described herein.



FIG. 2 shows various functional blocks in a system according to a specific embodiment of the present invention.



FIG. 3 illustrates pulse width adaptation using various waveform deltas according to a specific embodiment.



FIG. 4 illustrates various steps in optimizing the waveform delta according to a specific embodiment.



FIG. 5 illustrates one example of circuit logic for producing various waveform deltas in a specific embodiment.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF SPECIFIC EMBODIMENTS

For a near field communication (NFC) system as implemented for an implantable device such as a cochlear implant, variations in parameters and conditions strongly affect the shape of the HF signal and therefrom the duration of HI and LO logic states. Therefore, the robustness of a detection algorithm based on an O&C algorithm is strongly limited by the over-sampling factor (k) and the decision intervals. While k strongly affects power consumption (the higher k, the higher power consumption) and is therefore limited, the decision intervals are a free design parameter. In order to improve robustness, the decision intervals may be defined in an adaptive manner where a known training sequence at startup sets the optimum interval at the target's decoder.


As explained above, a typical NFC system may be characterized by:

    • passive NFC,
    • an initiator,
    • an inductive link,
    • OOK modulation of a RF sinusoid (forward link),
    • non-coherent demodulation and detection, and
    • load modulation at the target (back telemetry link).


      Under these constraints, if the separation between the coils (D) and their misalignment is a priori unknown (within some known interval), then the problem of implementing a robust detection algorithm becomes difficult: the bandwidth (B) and the quality factor (Q) of the HF link vary with D, and therefore the shape of the transmitted HF signal also varies with D (amplitude variations). A high Q, and therefore low B, limits the transition time of the HF signal and leads to signal degradation (causing inter symbol interference). If, additionally, variations due to electronic components, that is, discrete components, or process variations in integrated circuits (IC) are taken into account, then the detection problem gets harder. NFC systems of this class include, among others, data transmission systems in medical implants (e.g. cochlear implants), contact-less smartcards, and, in general, RFID systems.



FIG. 2 illustrates various functional blocks in one specific embodiment of the present invention. An external processor device includes a signal pre-conditioner 201 which sets an optimal pulse width of the initiator baseband signal at start-up. Modulator 202 then encodes the pre-conditioned baseband signal (Manchester encoded) using OOK modulation and the data signal is transmitted to the target device by an inductive link 203. Within the target device, the received modulated OOK signal is processed by demodulator 204 and detector 205. Telemetry feedback data is encoded by load modulator 206 and detected in the initiator device by telemetry circuit 207 for use by the control block 208 within the pre-conditioner 201.


In the pre-conditioner 201, the pulse width ratio between the HI logic state and LO logic state, referred to as the “delta” is set as shown in FIG. 3. Note that the bit duration of the Manchester signal remains the same. The delta is selected from a finite set by the control block 208. The delta directly affects the shape of the transmitted RF signal sent over the inductive link 203, and therefore the decision intervals can remain fixed.


A state machine in the control block 208 implements the specific procedure for setting the PW delta as shown in FIG. 4. After system power-up, the control block 208 selects the first delta and sends a test sequence, step 401. This training sequence may set one or more parameters of the target. Then, the control block 208 sends a telemetry command to the target, step 402, in order to read the previously set parameter based on the back telemetry signal sent by the target load modulator 206. In step 403, if the received parameter is not the correct one, then it is assumed that detection at the target failed (it is also assumed that the telemetry channel is a robust one which is usually the case). otherwise, detection worked correctly and this delta can be stored, step 405 and the test sequence delta is increased, step 405. This process is repeated, step 406, each one of the deltas in the test sequence. From all the stored deltas, one is selected as the “best,” (perhaps arbitrarily, e.g., the delta in the middle of the longest interval). This completes the delta setting process, the system switches to normal mode of operation, step 408.



FIG. 5 shows one example of a possible implementation of the pre-conditioning block 201 which sets the delta. Therein, bit signals C1 and C2 defined the current delta. DATA IN is given by the Manchester signal and DATA OUT is the signal already conditioned. DATA IN or its inverted version is selected thru the multiplexer by C1. This signal is stored in a shift register. The shift-register outputs are selected through a multiplexer by C2. The selected signal is ORed with the original signal or its inverted version. The output of the OR gate is again multiplexed by C1.


Embodiments of the invention may be implemented in any conventional computer programming language. For example, preferred embodiments may be implemented in a procedural programming language (e.g., “C”) or an object oriented programming language (e.g., “C++”, Python). Alternative embodiments of the invention may be implemented as pre-programmed hardware elements (e.g., ASIC or FPGA), other related components, or as a combination of hardware and software components.


Embodiments can be implemented as a computer program product for use with a computer system. Such implementation may include a series of computer instructions fixed either on a tangible medium, such as a computer readable medium (e.g., a diskette, CD-ROM, ROM, or fixed disk) or transmittable to a computer system, via a modem or other interface device, such as a communications adapter connected to a network over a medium. The medium may be either a tangible medium (e.g., optical or analog communications lines) or a medium implemented with wireless techniques (e.g., microwave, infrared or other transmission techniques). The series of computer instructions embodies all or part of the functionality previously described herein with respect to the system. Those skilled in the art should appreciate that such computer instructions can be written in a number of programming languages for use with many computer architectures or operating systems. Furthermore, such instructions may be stored in any memory device, such as semiconductor, magnetic, optical or other memory devices, and may be transmitted using any communications technology, such as optical, infrared, microwave, or other transmission technologies. It is expected that such a computer program product may be distributed as a removable medium with accompanying printed or electronic documentation (e.g., shrink wrapped software), preloaded with a computer system (e.g., on system ROM or fixed disk), or distributed from a server or electronic bulletin board over the network (e.g., the Internet or World Wide Web). Of course, some embodiments of the invention may be implemented as a combination of both software (e.g., a computer program product) and hardware. Still other embodiments of the invention are implemented as entirely hardware, or entirely software (e.g., a computer program product).


Although various exemplary embodiments of the invention have been disclosed, it should be apparent to those skilled in the art that various changes and modifications can be made which will achieve some of the advantages of the invention without departing from the true scope of the invention.

Claims
  • 1. A method for communication with an implanted medical device, the method comprising: for implant data signals having sequences of HI and LOW logic states at a fixed data bit rate with adjustable pulse width durations, defining a group of pre-determined pulse width durations based on a pulse width setting process that includes: i. transmitting to the implanted medical device a plurality of test sequence data signals using different pulse width durations, wherein each test sequence data signal sets one or more parameters of the implanted medical device,ii. for each of the test sequence data signals, (1) measuring a corresponding back telemetry signal from the implanted medical device communicating the one or more parameters set in the implanted medical device, and(2) comparing the one or more parameters set by the test sequence data signal to the one or more parameters communicated in the corresponding back telemetry signal, andiii. including the pulse width duration of a given test sequence data signal in the group of pre-determined pulse width durations when the one or more parameters set by each test sequence data signal correctly matches the one or more parameters communicated in the corresponding back telemetry signal; andoperating the implanted medical device by transmitting the implant data signals with pulse width durations selected from the group of pre-determined pulse width durations.
  • 2. A method according to claim 1, wherein the implant data signals are transmitted using an electromagnetic field induction link.
  • 3. A method according to claim 1, wherein the implant data signals are transmitted using a high-frequency band radio frequency between 3 MHz and 30 MHz.
  • 4. A method according to claim 1, wherein the implant data signal uses Manchester data encoding.
  • 5. A method according to claim 1, wherein the implanted medical device is a cochlear implant device.
Parent Case Info

This application claims priority from U.S. Provisional Patent Application 60/955,063, filed Aug. 10, 2007, which is incorporated herein by reference.

US Referenced Citations (52)
Number Name Date Kind
4233684 Eggermont Nov 1980 A
4284856 Hochmair et al. Aug 1981 A
4357497 Hochmair et al. Nov 1982 A
4428377 Zollner et al. Jan 1984 A
4592359 Galbraith Jun 1986 A
4612654 DeFreitas Sep 1986 A
5027306 Dattorro et al. Jun 1991 A
5069210 Jeutter et al. Dec 1991 A
5144306 Masuda Sep 1992 A
5215085 von Wallenberg-Pachaly Jun 1993 A
5305004 Fattaruso Apr 1994 A
5408235 Doyle et al. Apr 1995 A
5549658 Shannon et al. Aug 1996 A
5571148 Loeb et al. Nov 1996 A
5601617 Loeb et al. Feb 1997 A
5609616 Schulman et al. Mar 1997 A
5626629 Faltys et al. May 1997 A
5721783 Anderson Feb 1998 A
5733313 Barreras, Sr. et al. Mar 1998 A
5741314 Daly et al. Apr 1998 A
5749912 Zhang et al. May 1998 A
5824022 Zilberman et al. Oct 1998 A
5938691 Schulman et al. Aug 1999 A
5957958 Schulman et al. Sep 1999 A
6002966 Loeb et al. Dec 1999 A
6026125 Larrick, Jr. et al. Feb 2000 A
6031862 Fullerton et al. Feb 2000 A
6067474 Schulman et al. May 2000 A
6073050 Griffith Jun 2000 A
6167310 Grevious Dec 2000 A
6175767 Doyle, Sr. Jan 2001 B1
6181969 Gord Jan 2001 B1
6219580 Faltys et al. Apr 2001 B1
6289247 Faltys et al. Sep 2001 B1
6295472 Rubinstein et al. Sep 2001 B1
6308101 Faltys et al. Oct 2001 B1
6535153 Zierhofer Mar 2003 B1
6594525 Zierhofer Jul 2003 B1
6600955 Zierhofer Jul 2003 B1
6661363 Zierhofer Dec 2003 B2
6727833 Zierhofer Apr 2004 B2
6778858 Peeters Aug 2004 B1
6810289 Shaquer Oct 2004 B1
6826430 Faltys et al. Nov 2004 B2
7209523 Larrick et al. Apr 2007 B1
20010031909 Faltys et al. Oct 2001 A1
20040039423 Dolgin Feb 2004 A1
20050077872 Single Apr 2005 A1
20050107843 McDermott et al. May 2005 A1
20050203589 Zierhofer Sep 2005 A1
20060052841 Daly et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060265061 Kwon et al. Nov 2006 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (2)
Number Date Country
1124211 Aug 2001 EP
WO 9949815 Oct 1999 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (11)
Entry
Chakravarthy, C. V., “An amplitude-controlled adaptive delta sigma modulator”, The Radio and Electronic Engineer, vol. 49, No. 1, pp. 49-54, Jan. 1979.
Galbraith, D, et al, “A Wide-Bank Efficient Inductive Transdermal Power and Data Link with Coupling Insensitive Gain”, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, vol. BME-34, No. 4, pp. 265-275, Apr. 1987.
Gheewala, T, et al, “A CMOS Implantable Multielectrode Auditory Stimulator for the Deaf”, IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, pp. 472-479, Dec. 1975.
Wilson, B.S., et al, “Comparative Studies of Speech Processing Strategies for Cochlear Implants”, Laryngoscope, vol. 96, No. 10, pp. 1068-1077, Oct. 1988.
Wilson, B. S., et al, “Better speech recognition with cochlear implants”, Nature, vol. 352, pp. 236-238, Jul. 18, 1991.
Wilson, B. S., et al, “Seventh Quarterly Progress Report; Speech Processors for Auditory Prostheses”, Center for Auditory Prosthesis Research, pp. 1-69, 1994.
Zierhofer, C. M., et al, “Geometric Approach for Coupling Enhancement of Magnetically Coupled Coils”, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, vol. 43, No. 7, pp. 708-714, Jul. 1996.
Zierhofer, C. M., “Adaptive Sigma-Delta Modulation with One-Bit Quantization”, IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems-II: Analog and Digital Signal Processing, vol. 47, No. 5, pp. 408-415, May 2000.
Zierhofer, C. M., et al, “Electronic Design of a Cochlear Implant for Multichannel High-Rate Pulsatile Stimulation Strategies”, IEEE Transactions on Rehabilitation Engineering, vol. 3, No. 1, pp. 112-116, Mar. 1995.
Zierhofer, C. M., et al “High-Efficiency Coupling-Insensitive Transcutaneous Power and Data Transmission Via an Inductive Link”, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, vol. 37, No. 7, pp. 716-722, Jul. 1990.
European Patent and Trademark Office, International Search Report and Written Opinion, PCT/US2008/701520, dated Oct. 7, 2008.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20090043361 A1 Feb 2009 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
60955063 Aug 2007 US