The present application relates generally to pulsed control of electric motors, and more particularly, to selectively adjusting one or more of a pulsing frequency, an amplitude of the pulses and/or a duty cycle of the pulses for reducing Noise, Vibration and Harshness (NVH) while maintaining high levels of operating efficiency.
Electric motors and generators are structurally very similar. Both include a stator having a number of poles and a rotor. Most electrical motors can operate as a generator and vice-versa. When operating as motor, electrical energy is converted into mechanical energy. When operating as a generator, mechanical energy is converted into electrical energy. The term “machine” as used herein is therefore intended to be broadly construed to mean both electric motors and generators.
Electric machines are used in a wide variety of applications and are typically required to operate under a wide variety of loads. Since the energy conversion efficiency can vary considerably based on their measurable load, sometimes electric machines will operate at their peak efficiency, but very often they are required to operate outside their peak efficiency levels.
The pulsing is a known approach for improving machine efficiency. With a motor for example, an output torque is generated when pulsed on, but no torque output is generated between pulses. As a general rule, the amplitude (i.e., torque output) of the pulses is selected to be at or near the highest efficiency range of the motor while the duty cycle (i.e., the percentage of time the motor is pulsed on versus pulsed off) and/or frequency (i.e., the time interval between the pulses) are selected so that the overall output of the motor meets the requested torque demand, while operating as efficiently and economically as possible.
While the pulsed operation of machines increases efficiency and economy, there can be some downsides. In particular, the higher the amplitude of the pulses, the more Noise, Vibration and Harshness (NVH) that is typically generated. Also, if the frequency of the pulses is too low, excessive NVH may also result. In many applications, such as the use of motors in electric and/or hybrid vehicles, excessive NVH is unacceptable.
A need therefore exists to selectively adjust one or more of frequency, amplitude and/or duty cycle of the pulses used for pulsed operation of an electric machine for the purpose of reducing NVH, while still maintaining high levels of operating efficiency and economy.
The present invention relates to a system and method for adjusting a pulsing frequency during pulsed operation of an electric machine on vehicle for reducing Noise, Vibration and Harshness (NVH) while maintaining high levels of operating efficiency.
The invention and the advantages thereof, may best be understood by reference to the following description taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings in which:
In the drawings, like reference numerals are sometimes used to designate like structural elements. It should also be appreciated that the depictions in the figures are diagrammatic and not to scale.
The present disclosure relates generally to pulsed control of electric machines (e.g., electric motors and generators) to improve the energy conversion efficiency of the electric machine when operating conditions warrant. More specifically, under selected operating conditions, an electric machine is intermittently pulsed to operate at higher efficiency levels compared to conventional continuous machine control, thereby delivering a desired average torque output in a more energy efficient manner than previously possible.
The Applicant has filed a number of applications related to the pulse control of electric machines, including U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 62/644,912, filed on Mar. 19, 2018, U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 62/810,861, filed on Feb. 26, 2019, U.S. Provisional Application No. 62/819,097, filed Mar. 15, 2019 and U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 62/658,739, filed Apr. 17, 2018. Each of the above-listed applications is incorporated by reference herein for all purposes.
For the sake of simplicity, the discussion below pertains to controlling the pulsing to reduce NVH in the context of motors used for electric vehicles and/or hybrid vehicles. It should be understood that discussion below should in no regard be construed as limiting. On the contrary, the same or similar pulsing strategies, as described herein, are equally applicable to machines while operating as generators and machines operating in a wide variety of applications, such as appliances like washing machines, dryers and dishwashers, HVAC equipment such as compressors, etc.
Referring to
(a) The illustrated motor is generally most efficient when it is operating within a particular speed range and generating torque within a defined range. For the particular motor shown, the most efficient region is the area designated by reference number 14, which is generally in the range of 4500-6000 RPM with a torque output in the range of about 50-80 Nm. In this region 14, the energy conversion efficiency of the motor is approximately 96%. The region 14 is thus sometimes referred to herein as the “sweet spot”, which is the most efficient operating region for a given machine.
(b) At any particular machine speed, there will be a corresponding most efficient output torque, which is diagrammatically illustrated by a maximum efficiency curve 16. The motor's efficiency, for any given machine speed, tends to drop off somewhat when the load is higher or lower than the most efficient load. In some regions the motor's efficiency tends to drop relatively quickly, as for example, when the torque output falls below about 30 Nm in the illustrated exemplary motor.
(c) Also, when the desired motor torque is below the most efficient output torque as designated by the curve 16 for a given current machine speed; the overall efficiency of the motor can be improved by pulsed operation. Conversely, when the desired motor torque is at or above the maximum efficiency curve 16, the motor may be operated in a conventional (i.e., continuous/non-pulsed) manner to most efficiently deliver the desired torque.
Based on the above-defined observations, it is clear that the overall energy conversion efficiency of the motor could be significantly improved if the operating conditions are controlled so that the motor is almost always operated at or near its “sweet spot” designated by region 14. Unfortunately, many applications require that the motor operate over a wide range of varying torque requirements, and/or widely varying machine speeds, often which fall outside of the sweet spot.
One such application is automotive and other vehicle or mobility applications where the electric motor is often coupled to the wheel of the vehicle or other driveline component(s) (such as the gearbox, transmission, any internal combustion engine, driveshaft, differential, etc.). Over a typical drive cycle the machine speed may vary between zero when the vehicle is stopped to a relatively high RPM when cruising at highway speeds. The torque requirements may also vary widely at any of those speeds based on components such as whether the vehicle is accelerating or decelerating, going uphill, downhill, going on relatively flat terrain, vehicle weight, and many other components. Of course, motors used in other applications may be subjected to a wide variety of operating conditions as well.
With pulsed control, the output of the machine is intelligently and intermittently modulated between “torque on” and “zero (no) torque” states in a manner that: (1) meet measurable torque demands, while (2) improving overall efficiency. Stated differently, under selected operating conditions, the electric machine is intermittently driven at a more efficient energy conversion operating level (the “torque on” state) to deliver a desired output. In the periods between the pulses, the machine ideally does not generate or consume any torque (the “zero torque” state). This can conceptually be thought of as turning the electric machine “off.” In some implementations, this can be accomplished by effectively turning the electric machine “off,” as for example, by shutting off drive current to a motor or the excitation current for a generator. However, in other implementations, the electric machine may be controlled during the “zero torque” state in a manner that attempts to cause the torque generated by the electric machine to be zero or as close to zero as practical or appropriate for the particular machine. In some implementations, any power converters used in conjunction with the electric machine may effectively be turned off for at least portions of the “zero torque” periods as well.
The efficiency map illustrated in
The plot 20 is useful in illustrating how the motor can be operated in different modes, each resulting in the generation of the desired motor torque of 10 Nm. However, as explained below, efficiency of the motor can be improved depending on which mode of operation is selected.
In a first mode, the motor can be run continuously, generating a steady output of 10 Nm. As noted above, since a steady output of 10 Nm is well below the most efficient output of the motor, this mode of operation is clearly less than ideal from an efficiency point of view.
In a second mode, the motor can be driven at its peak efficiency output of 50 Nm, but with a duty cycle of only 20% and delivering zero (no) torque the remaining 80% of the time. In other words, by pulsing the motor on using a twenty percent (20%) duty cycle at peak efficiency of 50 Nm, and off the remaining eighty percent (80%) of time between pulses, the same net output of 10 Nm is realized, but the overall efficiency of the motor is significantly improved.
The second mode of operation can be widely varied to meet changing measurable torque demands. For instance:
(a) If the desired motor output changes to 20 Nm, the duty cycle of the motor operating at 50 Nm can be increased to 40%;
(b) If the desired motor output changes to 40 Nm, the duty cycle can be increased to 80%;
(c) If the desired motor output changes to 5 Nm, the duty cycle can be reduced to 10% and so on.
As long as the desired motor output does not exceed the peak efficiency of 50 Nm, the desired motor output can be met merely by changing the duty cycle of the motor operating at 50 Nm. As each of these examples illustrate, pulsing the motor will advantageously yield efficiency benefits when the desired motor torque falls below the maximum efficiency curve 16.
The frequency or timing of the on and/or off time units actually used may vary widely based on the size, nature and design needs of any particular machine system. In practice, when the motor is switched from the “torque on” state to the “zero torque” state relatively rapidly to achieve a desired duty cycle, the fact that the motor is actually being switched back and forth between these states may not materially degrade the performance of the motor from an measurable standpoint. In some embodiments, the timing of the periods for each on/off cycle may widely vary. For example, in the above listed U.S. patent applications, the expected on/off cycle is described as being in the order of 100 μsec to 0.10 seconds (i.e. pulsing at a frequency in the range of 10 to 10,000 Hz), as for example in the range of 20 to 1000 Hz, or 20 to 100 Hz. The appropriate pulsing frequency may be a function of the type of electric motor being controlled and the application's tolerance for NVH that may be introduced by pulsing.
The zero torque portions of the pulse cycle might conceptually be viewed as shutting the motor off, although in many cases the motor may not actually be shut off during those periods or may be shut off for only portions of the “zero torque” intervals.
Many electric motors used for general passenger vehicles are designed to operate using alternating current (AC). However, this is by no means a requirement. With other vehicles, the motors used can be permanent magnet AC, induction AC and/or DC.
In
In
In both examples, the duty cycle is 50%. However, the duration of the “on” and “off” time durations is different (i.e. the frequency of the pulsed modulation is different). The frequency of the pulsed modulation may vary based on the type of electrical machine used, noise and vibration considerations, current operating rotor speed and other components.
Electric and/or hybrid vehicles are now common and are increasing in popularity. It has been predicted that over the course of the next decade or two, electric and/or hybrid vehicles will surpass or altogether replace conventional internal combustion engine vehicles.
With electric and/or hybrid vehicles, one or more onboard machines is/are provided. In the case of an electric vehicle, only electric machine(s) is/are used to generate the needed torque to propel the vehicle. With a hybrid, the electric machine operates in cooperation with an internal combustion engine to propel the vehicle. With either type of vehicle, the torque generated by the electric machines may be a positive torque or a negative torque (i.e., the machine operates as a generator) to transfer vehicle kinetic energy into stored electrical energy. For example with regenerative braking, the machine is typically used to convert mechanical energy into electrical energy that is stored in a storage device, such as a battery or capacitor. The stored energy can be used by the electric machine when operating as a motor, or alternatively to power other electrical systems on the vehicle, such as the air conditioner, heater, defroster, various lighting systems, entertainment system, etc.
The pulsing of an onboard machine when on a vehicle promises significant advantages for increased efficiency. By increasing efficiency, the range of the vehicle can be increased before either a battery recharge is needed and/or refueling is needed as is the case with hybrids. For example, if an electric vehicle with a range of 300 miles can increase its range by ten percent (10%) by operating the onboard machines more efficiently, then the range is extended by approximately another 30 miles.
In the automotive and truck industry, NVH is a major design consideration. If the NVH of a vehicle is too high, the experience for both the driver and other passenger occupants can become unpleasant. In addition, excessive NVH may cause premature wear and tear on the vehicle. The industry is therefore diligent in reducing NVH as much as reasonably possible. In addressing NVH related issues, three factors are generally considered, including:
(1) Sources of NVH. Generally, anything connected to the vehicle that vibrates, generates noise or harshness, such as the engine, motors, driveline components, wheels, open windows, exhaust systems, tire/road noise, gearboxes, differentials, etc., is considered a source of NVH;
(2) Engineering steps to reduce the transmission of the NVH to the driver or other occupants in the vehicle. For instance, engine or machine mounts, active vehicle suspensions, noise and damping materials, are examples of steps taken and/or materials used by automotive engineers to reduce the transmission of NVH; and
(3) Features included on the vehicle to either (a) mask or reduce the amount of NVH perceived by the occupants or (b) to adjust the amounts of NVH that are considered acceptable. For instance, some vehicles now have active noise or vibration systems to cancel out noise and vibration within the cabin of the vehicle. Other vehicles may have active sound enhancement systems such as sports cars, which ad noise within the cabin of the vehicle to make a more pleasing engine sound. Other vehicles may have driver selectable modes that will adjust the amount of NVH that is considered acceptable. If a vehicle is equipped with an economy mode or a sport mode, the amount of NVH that is considered acceptable when either of these modes is used is generally increased. In other words with the economy and sport modes, the driver is making a conscious decision to forgo lower levels of NVH for either improved economy or performance respectively. On the other hand the vehicle may also have a comfort mode, in which case active steps are taken to reduce the levels of NVH. In this latter mode, the driver is making a conscious decision to forgo economy for improved comfort.
With the pulsing of electric machine for vehicle applications, the critical parameters of the pulses for meeting torque demands include (1) amplitude, (2) duty cycle, and (3) frequency. With vehicles powered by electric motors, the amplitude of the pulses is largely dictated by the optimal efficiency value of the motor for a given torque request and machine speed (i.e., the “sweet spot” as defined by maximum efficiency curve 16 of
Determining the third parameter, the frequency of the pulses, however, is more challenging since there are opposing factors to consider. With automotive applications, the pulsing of a machine at low frequencies causes mechanical vibrations. Since humans are most sensitive to low frequency mechanical vibrations in the 2-10 Hz frequency range, a pulsing frequency within this range may result in high or even unacceptable levels of NVH. Thus, for vehicles, the ideal pulsing frequency is typically at a higher frequency rate, but not too high a rate such that some or all efficiency gains resulting from pulsed operation are lost in switching transients. The objective then is to select, for a given torque request and speed, a minimum pulse frequency so as to preserve or maintain efficiency gains while meeting acceptable levels of NVH.
One aspect of the present application is to select a pulsing frequency for electric machines that are used on vehicles. Rather than picking a pulsing frequency simply based on avoiding the 2-10 Hz frequency range, the present application teaches that numerous other considerations may also be used to adjust or “fine tune” the pulsing frequency so as to (1) achieve high levels of economy while (2) providing a driving experience with acceptable levels of NVH. Such other considerations include a number of measurable parameters of components on the vehicle itself and/or features on the vehicle that may affect the level of NVH that is considered acceptable. Such exemplary components and/or features, and how they may affect NVH, are discussed below.
Electrical vehicles having a multi-gear gearbox can generally be run more efficiently than those having just a single gear. With multiple gear ratios, the electric machines of the vehicle may operate more efficiently over a wider range of speeds and/or torques. With electric and/or hybrid vehicles with multi-gear gearboxes, however, each gear may result in different resonant frequencies for the vehicle and/or driveline. For example, in one gear, the resonant frequency may be 15 Hz, but 25 Hz in a second gear. As a result, the frequency for pulsing an electric machine should be selected so as to not exasperate the resonate frequency of the gear the vehicle is using. Accordingly the pulsing frequency is preferably selected so as to (a) avoid or exasperate resonate frequencies and (b) increase efficiency.
Many electric and/or hybrid vehicle include multiple electric machines, including one or potentially more machines per wheel. With multiple electric machines, the vehicle may operate in different wheel drive configurations at any point in time. For instance, depending on driving conditions or circumstances, a given vehicle can operation in Rear Wheel Drive (RWD) only, Front Wheel Drive (FWD) only, or All Wheel Drive (AWD). With most vehicles, the NVH characteristics differ depending on the wheel drive configuration since the individual electrical machines may be either connected or disconnected from the driveline. Also, the resonant frequencies of the vehicle may change depending on which electric machines are connected and active and which are disconnected and are not active. For each possible combination, the vehicle will therefore exhibit different NVH characteristics. Accordingly, depending on the current wheel drive status, the pulsing frequency is preferably adjusted for each possible wheel drive configuration. Again, the objective is generally to improve economy and efficiency, while not generating excessive levels of NVH.
As is well understood in the field of physics, force equals mass times acceleration (F=M×A). As a general rule for a given excitation force, the larger the mass, the slower the mass will accelerate or vibrate. With vehicles, this law of physics generally means the more weight and/or load carried by a vehicle, the less NVH there will be. With a heavy load, such as multiple passengers or heavy cargo, the amount of NVH will tend to be less than if the vehicle had only a driver or was carrying no or a light cargo. As a general rule therefore, lower pulsing frequencies can be used for high mass vehicles and/or vehicles carrying a heavy payload compared to lighter vehicles or vehicles carrying light or no payload. The change in vehicle mass may also affect the natural frequencies of the vehicle. Hence, the motor pulsing frequency to be avoided may also change with vehicle mass. This may lead to a lower frequency being avoided for a higher vehicle mass.
On most electric vehicles, mounts are used to attach the machines to the driveline of the vehicle. With hybrids, mounts are also used between the internal combustion engine (ICE) and the frame and/or driveline of the vehicle. In either case, the mounts are used to mechanically isolate the electric machine or ICE and prevent vibrations from being transmitted to other portions of the vehicle including the passenger cab. While mounts generally work in reducing NVH, they do have some drawbacks. First, mounts typically work best when they are at a warm operating temperature. As such, mounts may be less effective in stopping the transmission of vibration when cold, such as with low ambient temperatures, or immediately following a cold start. Second, as mounts age, they tend to lose their effectiveness in damping the transmission of vibrations. Either way, more NVH is typically transmitted along the driveline and via other paths to the occupants of the vehicle. Accordingly the pulsing frequency for pulsing electric machines can be more aggressive when mounts are warm and/or newer, meaning a lower pulsing frequency can be used. On the other hand for aging mounts, cold starts and/or cold ambient temperatures, a higher pulsing frequency can be used so as to not generate excessive levels of NVH.
Many vehicles now include features that allow the setting or adjustment of the level of NVH that is tolerable. Such features include, but are not limited to, an economy or “eco” mode, a sport mode, a luxury mode, or a selectable NVH level mode. With the eco mode, the driver can opt to improve efficiency at the expense of additional NVH. As a result, the pulsing frequency used while operating in the eco mode can be more aggressive (i.e., a lower pulsing frequency is used) relative to when the vehicle is in a non eco mode. Similarly with the sport mode, the driver has opted for more performance at the expense of increased NVH. With the higher level of acceptable NVH, a lower, more aggressive, pulsing frequency may be used. On the contrary if the driver selects a “luxury” mode or similar, then low levels of NVH are expected. A more benign pulsing frequency (i.e., a higher pulsing frequency) should therefore be used so that the electric machines generate less NVH. If the vehicle has an adjustable NVH control, then again the pulsing frequency can be adjusted depending on the NVH setting. If more or less NVH is selected by the driver as acceptable, then the pulsing frequency can be adjusted lower or higher respectively.
Autonomous driving is in its early stages of development and deployment. In the near future, however, autonomous driving is expected to become commonplace. With autonomous driving, a vehicle can drive either unoccupied or with passenger(s). In cases where there are no passengers, NVH constraints can be relaxed since there is no human inside the vehicle. Accordingly, when an occupancy sensor in a vehicle senses no passengers, then a more aggressive (i.e., a lower) pulsing frequency can be used compared to when a driver and/or passengers are present.
Vehicles tend to run smoother, with less NVH, when operating at a warm temperature as opposed to a cold temperature. When the ambient temperatures are cold, and prior to the vehicle warming to its normal operating temperature, excessive NVH may be generated. For example, cold ambient temperatures adversely cause various vehicle components, such as body mounts, exhaust hangers, the suspension system, tires, etc., to generate more NVH. The pulsing frequency can therefore be adjusted upward or downward depending on if the ambient temperature is cold or hot respectively. As the vehicle warms, and/or as the ambient temperatures warm, then the pulsing frequency can be reduced accordingly.
As previously noted, when the driveline and/or other components of a vehicle are cold, they tend to generated more NVH. As the vehicle warm and reaches its operating warm temperature, the level of NVH typically decreases. Similarly, a new vehicle typically generates less NVH than an old vehicle. Due to wear and tear, vehicle components such as engine mounts, shock absorbers, springs, etc., become less effective and tend to transmit more NVH. In non-exclusive embodiments, vehicles may include software programs or algorithms (hereafter generically referred to as “models”) that predict NVH during operation. For example, one model can be employed to predict the level of NVH as a vehicle warms immediately following a cold start. Another model can be used to predict NVH has the vehicle ages. In either case, the models can be used to predict the level of NVH generated by the vehicle during operation. Then based on the predicted NVH, a pulsing frequency can be adjusted. Again, when higher levels of NVH are predicted, higher pulsing frequencies are typically used. When predicted NVH levels are low, then lower pulsing frequencies may be used.
Many vehicles now include active noise and/or vibration control systems than can be used to cancel NVH. For instance, some automobiles now employ active noise cancellation technology through the audio system of the vehicle to cancel out noise that infiltrates into the cabin. Similarly, many vehicles also have adjustable suspension systems, such as magnetic ride control, that prevent vibrations from reaching the occupant(s) of the cabin of the vehicle. Since these systems mask out a certain amount of NVH, more aggressive (i.e., lower) pulsing frequencies may be used compared to if such systems are not used.
Many vehicles now include equipment that makes it possible to monitor road surface conditions. Such equipment includes, for example, onboard cameras, radar and/or lidar that are used for cruise control and other forms of autonomous driving, and GPS. In each case, the surface conditions of the road a vehicle is traveling can be monitored and ascertained. In situations where the road surface is poor (e.g., pot holes, surface cracks, worn paved surfaces, etc.) the vehicle will unavoidably experience high levels of NVH. In contrast with a smooth road surface, the levels of NVH will be much lower. Depending on the road surface, the pulsing frequency can therefore be adjusted depending on the road surface. When the road surface is rough, the pulsing frequency for electric machines can be more aggressive (i.e., a lower pulsing frequency) since the NVH from the road surface will mask out any NVH caused by the pulsing of the electronic machine(s). When the road surface is smooth, the pulsing frequency is preferably increased so that NVH from operation of the electric machine(s) do not cause noticeable or excessive NVH.
In the above discussion pertaining to (a) gearing, (b) wheel drive states, (c) vehicle mass and/or payload, (d) mounts, (e) user adjustable features (e.g., eco, sport, luxury modes and/or NVH adjustable levels, (f) temperature and/or occupancy sensors, (g) models, (h) active noise or vibration cancelling systems, and/or (i) road surface monitoring equipment, it is proposed to adjust or “fine tune” the pulsing frequency to take into account a wide variety of operating conditions and circumstances and any of the parameters or features (a) through (i) discussed above. By fine tuning the frequency either up or down, (1) higher levels of economy can be achieved, while (2) always providing “acceptable” levels of NVH, which may varying depending on conditions and circumstances. For each of (a) through (i), a number of different approaches can be used for ascertaining the pulsing frequency that meets the above-described objectives (1) and (2). Such approaches include, but are not limited to, the use of tables, sliding scales, a multiplier/divider, etc.
A proposed approach of selecting a pulsing frequency that allows for more or less NVH as conditions warrant, but without ever generating excessive levels of NVH, is the use of one or more table(s). With such an approach, one or more tables is/are constructed using empirical data for a given vehicle-electric machine or machines combination. From the data, the table(s) is/are constructed that define the ideal or preferred pulsing frequencies over a wide variety of operating conditions that permit for either more or less aggressive pulsing frequencies as circumstances warrant, meaning allowing more NVH or reducing NVH, without ever generating excessive levels of NVH.
Referring to
For the sake of simplicity, only one table 40 is described and illustrated. It should be understood that in real-world applications with most vehicles, typically multiple tables will be used. In certain non-exclusive embodiments, multiple tables are typically provided for each of (a) through (i) as defined above. For instance, tables are provided for (a) each gear in the gearbox, (b) for each possible configuration of the wheel drive, (c) for a wide range of payloads, and so on for (d) through (i) respectively. In each case, the various pulsing frequencies provided in the tables are created from empirical data collected during testing for a given vehicle-machine(s) combination. Once the testing of the vehicle is complete, and the empirical data collected and processed, the individual tables can be constructed. In each case, the pulsing frequencies are preferably selected that permit for either more or less aggressive pulsing frequencies, meaning more or less NVH, without ever generating excessive levels of NVH, while maximizing efficiency for a given set of conditions and/or circumstances.
It is further noted that the tables do not necessarily have to be two-dimensional as illustrated in
In other non-exclusive embodiments, a sliding scale and/or a multiplier/divider can be used ascertain the pulsing frequency for any of (a) through (i). For example with vehicle mass and/or payload (c), a sliding scale or multiplier can be used. In other words as the mass of the payload of a vehicle is increased or decreased, then the pulsing frequency is either scaled downward or upward respectively. Alternatively, a multiplier/divider value can be used to adjust a base pulsing frequency for any of (a) through (i). In variations of these embodiments, the scaling factor and/or the divider/multiplier can be either linear or non-linear. In the case of the latter, scaling and/or multiplier/divider algorithms can be used to ascertain the pulsing frequency in a non-linear fashion depending on conditions and circumstances.
Referring to
The power converter 52 operates as a power inverter or power rectifier depending on the direction of energy flow through the system. When the electric machine 56 is operated as a motor, the power converter 52 is responsible for generating three-phased AC power from the DC power supply 54 to drive the machine 56. The three-phased input power, labeled as phase “A”, phase “B”, and phase “C”, is applied to the windings of the stator of the electric machine 56 as is well known in the art. When the electric machine 56 is operating as a generator, the power converter 52 operates as a power rectifier and the AC power coming from the electric machine 56 is converted to DC power that is stored in the DC power supply 54.
In various embodiments, the power controller 52 may be a conventional power converter or a “boosted” power converter, both of which are described in detail in commonly assigned U.S. application Ser. No. 16/818,570 filed Mar. 13, 2020, incorporated by reference herein for all purposes.
The pulse controller 58 is also responsible for (1) defining when the machine 56 should operate in a continuous mode or pulsed mode, (2) defining the pulsing amplitude, pulsing frequency, and duty cycle for the three-phased input power signals A, B and C when in the pulsed mode and (3) providing control signals so that the power converter 52 can either continuously generate or pulse the three-phase power signals A, B and C provided to the machine 46. During pulsed operation, the three-phase power signals A, B and C are pulsed in accordance with whatever the amplitude, duty cycle and pulsing frequency the pulse controller determines to meet the torque demand for a given speed.
As previously described, determining the amplitude and the duty cycle for a given torque demand and speed are relatively straight forward. The amplitude is selected so that the electric machine 56 operates in or near its “sweet spot” maximum efficiency range, while the duty cycle is adjusted as needed so that the torque output of the electric machine meets the requested torque. Ascertaining the pulsing frequency, however, is more involved due to NVH implications.
To ascertain the pulsing frequency, the pulse controller 58 receives one or more of the inputs 60 (see
It should be noted that the inputs listed in
During driving, various torque demands will be made and the machine speed will change depending on the gear and as the vehicle accelerates and/or decelerate, drives up hills or down hills, etc. The pulse controller 58, in response, adjust the amplitude and duty cycle of the pulses as needed and ascertains the different pulsing frequencies to meet the instantaneous torque demands while preventing excessive levels of NVH. When conditions warrant, a more aggressive pulsing frequency may be used to improve efficiency and economy. Alternatively, less aggressive pulsing may be used to prevent excessive NVH. As a result, the vehicle can overall be operated in a highly efficient manner, while selectively controlling NVH levels generated by the electric machine 56 so as to prevent or mitigate excessive levels of NVH.
In yet another embodiment, the pulsing frequency as defined by the pulse controller 58 can also be forwarded on to other sub-systems 64 on the vehicle that could utilize this information in meaningful ways. One example is to provide the pulsing frequency to sub-system(s) 64 such active noise and/or vibration control, which could use the pulsing frequency information as a reference/feed-forward signal to identify which frequencies to target for cancellation.
Referring to
In the initial step 72, the current torque request and machine speed are ascertained.
In decision step 74, a determination is made based on the ascertained current torque request and speed if the electric machine 56 should operate in the continuous mode or the pulsed mode. In other words, a determination is made if the desired torque demand is above or below the most efficient output torque for the current speed (i.e., the maximum efficiency curve 16 of the motor map illustrated in
In step 76, the motor is operated in the continuous mode if the requested torque is above the most efficient output torque for the current machine speed.
In step 78, the amplitude of the pulses for maximum efficiency at the current machine speed is determined if the requested torque is below the most efficient output torque for the current machine speed.
In step 80, the duty cycle for operation in the pulsed mode is determined so that the average torque output of the on pulses matches the desired output.
In step 82, a pulsing frequency is ascertained by the pulse controller 58. As described above, the pulse controller ascertains the pulsing frequency by either accessing one or more tables 40 and/or relying on the computation module 62. As previously described, one or more of the inputs (a) through (i) may indicate that the pulsing frequency be adjusted upward so as to reduce NVH or revised downward if more NVH is acceptable or tolerable.
The above steps 72-82 are continuously performed while the electric machine 56 is in operation. At any particular machine speed and torque request, there will be a corresponding most efficient output torque. As the instantaneous torque request and/or current machine speed change, a decision is made to operate the motor in either the continuous or pulsed mode as appropriate. When the desired motor torque is below the most efficient output torque for the current machine speed, the overall efficiency of the motor is improved not only by pulsing the motor, but by adjusting the pulse frequency to take into account the inputs (a) through (i). As a result, for electric machine-powered vehicles, the overall efficiency of the vehicle is improved; meaning the vehicle range between battery recharging (or refueling with hybrids) is extended, while acceptable levels of NVH are achieved.
On occasion, two or more of the inputs (a) through (i) may suggest or indicate that the base pulsing frequency should be modified or adjusted in opposing directions. For example, switching from first gear to second gear allows the pulsing frequency to be reduced. However, if a user selectable NVH control requires a higher frequency for better NVH, then adjusting the pulsing frequency downward may not be feasible. On the other hand if the vehicle is unoccupied, then adjusting the pulsing frequency downward is not a problem. As these two examples illustrate, the pulse controller 58 preferably makes a final decision on pulsing frequency on a case-by-case basis after considering all the inputs (a) through (i) and a totality of the circumstances. It is noted that in the event of a conflict, the pulsing frequency is often adjusted so as to reduce NVH. It should be understood, however, that this is by no means a requirement. On the contrary for a given conflict, the pulsing frequency adjustment can result in an increase or decrease of NVH. Accordingly, the pulsing frequency for any two or more components or features are in conflict can be adjusted in accordance with any predetermined algorithm arranged to address the conflict.
Referring to
In one embodiment, the present invention pertains to an electric machine controller for controlling the pulsing of an electric machine onboard a vehicle. In particular, the electric machine controller is arranged to, determine a torque demand for operating the machine as a motor, determine an amplitude for pulsed operation of the machine as the motor, determine a duty cycle for the pulsed operation of the machine as the motor, the amplitude and the duty cycle resulting in the generation of the determined torque demand, and ascertain a frequency for the pulsed operation of the machine as a motor while generating the determined torque demand, the frequency ascertained by taking into account Noise, Vibration and Harshness (NVH) either (a) caused by a measurable parameter of the vehicle or (b) a feature on the vehicle that adjust an amount of the NVH that is acceptable.
In another embodiment, the present invention pertains to a method of pulse controlling an electric machine used on a vehicle. The method involves pulsing the electric machine at a frequency that has been adjusted to take into account Noise, Vibration and Harshness (NVH) that is either caused by one or more components on the vehicle or that allows an adjustment of an amount of the NVH that is acceptable.
In yet another embodiment, the present invention pertains to an electric machine controller for controlling pulsing of an electric machine. The machine controller is configured to receive a signal indicative of a magnitude of Noise, Vibration and Harshness (NVH), compare the magnitude of NVH to a threshold; and adjust a pulsing frequency used to pulse the electric machine if the magnitude of the NVH exceeds the threshold, the pulsing frequency adjusted so that the magnitude of the NVH is reduced below the threshold.
It should be apparent from the foregoing description that the described pulsed machine control can be utilized in a wide variety of different applications to improve the energy conversion efficiency of a wide variety of different types of electric motors and generators. These include both AC and DC motors/generators. A few representative types of electric machines that may benefit from the described pulsing include both asynchronous and synchronous AC electric machines including Induction machines (IM), switched reluctance machines (SRM), Synchronous Reluctance machines (SynRM), Permanent Magnet Synchronous Reluctance machines (PMaSynRM), Hybrid PMaSynRMs; Externally Excited AC Synchronous machines (SyncAC), Permanent Magnet Synchronous machines (PMSM), Eddy current machines, AC linear machines, AC and DC mechanically commutated machines, axial flux motors, etc. Representative DC electric machines include brushless, electrically excited, permanent magnet, series wound, shunt, brushed, compound and others.
Although automotive applications have been used as an example of a vehicle propulsion application, it should be appreciated that the described control approach is equally beneficial in other propulsion related applications including: electric motors used in other types of vehicles including trucks, cars, carts, motorcycles, bicycles, drones and other flying devices; in robots and other devices that move autonomously within an environment; etc. As such, the term “vehicle” should be broadly construed to include all of the above and any other type of motorized moving assembly whether known now or developed in the future.
Motors used in appliances such as washing machines, dryers, heating, ventilation and air conditioning (HVAC) applications are another good examples of applications that can benefit from pulsed control. There are several components that contribute to pulsed motor control being a good fit for HVAC applications. These include the facts that: (a) the machines used in HVAC applications today are predominantly induction motors that don't contain permanent magnets; (b) a high percentage of the motors used in HVAC applications, including in particular variable speed HVAC condensers and/or air handlers, operate a substantial portion of the time operating regions below their high efficiency areas; and (c) the inertia of a fan or pump normally dominates the motor inertia, which tends to further mitigate potential NVH related impacts associated with pulsing.
Although only a few embodiments of the invention have been described in detail, it should be appreciated that the invention may be implemented in many other forms without departing from the spirit or scope of the invention. The various described pulse controllers and other control elements may be implemented, grouped, and configured in a wide variety of different architectures in different embodiments. For example, in some embodiments, the pulse controller may be incorporated into a motor controller or an inverter controller or it may be provided as a separate component. Similarly, for a generator, the pulse controller may be incorporated into a generator controller or a rectifier controller and in combined motor/generators the pulse controller may be incorporated into a combined motor/generator controller or a combined inverter/rectifier controller. In some embodiments, the described control functionality may be implemented algorithmically in software or firmware executed on a processor—which may take any suitable form, including, for example, general purpose processors and microprocessors, DSPs, etc.
The pulse generator or machine controller may be part of a larger control system. For example, in vehicular applications, the described control may be part of a vehicle controller, a powertrain controller, a hybrid powertrain controller, or an ECU (engine control unit), etc. that performs a variety of functions related to vehicle control. In such applications, the vehicle or other relevant controller, etc. may take the form of a single processor that executes all of the required control, or it may include multiple processors that are co-located as part of a powertrain or vehicle control module or that are distributed at various locations within the vehicle. The specific functionalities performed by any one of the processors or control units may be widely varied.
Generally, the schemes for pulsed motor control may be implemented digitally, algorithmically, using analog components or using hybrid approaches. The pulse generator and/or the motor controller may be implemented as code executing on a processor, on programmable logic such as an FPGA (field programmable gate array), in circuitry such as an ASIC (application specific integrated circuit), on a digital signal processor (DSP), using analog components, or any other suitable piece of hardware. In some implementations, the described control schemes may be incorporated into object code to be executed on a digital signal processor (DSP) incorporated into an inverter controller (and/or rectifier controller in the context of a generator and/or a combined inverter/rectifier controller).
Therefore, the present embodiments should be considered illustrative and not restrictive and the invention is not to be limited to the details given herein, but may be modified within the scope and equivalents of the appended claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4441043 | Decesare | Apr 1984 | A |
4989146 | Imajo | Jan 1991 | A |
5099410 | Divan | Mar 1992 | A |
5151637 | Takada et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
5325028 | Davis | Jun 1994 | A |
5483141 | Uesugi | Jan 1996 | A |
5640073 | Ikeda et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5731669 | Shimizu et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
6291960 | Crombez | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6308123 | Ikegaya et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6370049 | Heikkila | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6424799 | Gilmore | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6493204 | Glidden et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6605912 | Bharadwaj et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6829515 | Grimm | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6829556 | Kumar | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6906485 | Hussein | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6940239 | Iwanaga et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
7190143 | Wei et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7259664 | Cho et al. | Aug 2007 | B1 |
7327545 | Konishi | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7411801 | Welchko et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7453174 | Kalsi | Nov 2008 | B1 |
7558655 | Garg et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7577511 | Tripathi et al. | Aug 2009 | B1 |
7616466 | Chakrabarti et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7768170 | Tatematsu et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7852029 | Kato et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7928686 | Saha et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7960888 | Ai et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7969341 | Robbe et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
8099224 | Tripathi et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8768563 | Nitzberg et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8773063 | Nakata | Jul 2014 | B2 |
9007005 | Sung et al. | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9007013 | Bae | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9046559 | Lindsay et al. | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9050894 | Banerjee et al. | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9308822 | Matsuda | Apr 2016 | B2 |
9495814 | Ramesh | Nov 2016 | B2 |
9512794 | Serrano et al. | Dec 2016 | B2 |
9630614 | Hill et al. | Apr 2017 | B1 |
9702420 | Yoon | Jul 2017 | B2 |
9758044 | Gale et al. | Sep 2017 | B2 |
9948173 | Abu Qahouq | Apr 2018 | B1 |
10060368 | Pirjaberi et al. | Aug 2018 | B2 |
10081255 | Yamada et al. | Sep 2018 | B2 |
10256680 | Hunstable | Apr 2019 | B2 |
10273894 | Tripathi | Apr 2019 | B2 |
10291168 | Fukuta | May 2019 | B2 |
10291174 | Irie et al. | May 2019 | B2 |
10320249 | Okamoto et al. | Jun 2019 | B2 |
10340821 | Magee et al. | Jul 2019 | B2 |
10344692 | Nagashima et al. | Jul 2019 | B2 |
10381968 | Agirman | Aug 2019 | B2 |
10476421 | Khalil et al. | Nov 2019 | B1 |
10550776 | Leone et al. | Feb 2020 | B1 |
10742155 | Tripathi | Aug 2020 | B2 |
10763772 | Fatemi et al. | Sep 2020 | B1 |
10944352 | Mazda et al. | Mar 2021 | B2 |
11077759 | Srinivasan | Aug 2021 | B1 |
11088644 | Carvell | Aug 2021 | B1 |
11133763 | Islam | Sep 2021 | B1 |
11133767 | Serrano et al. | Sep 2021 | B2 |
11167648 | Carvell et al. | Nov 2021 | B1 |
11228272 | Tripathi | Jan 2022 | B2 |
20010039926 | Kobayashi et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020043954 | Hallidy et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20050127861 | McMillan et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050151437 | Ramu | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050160771 | Hosoito et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20070216345 | Kanamori | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070287594 | DeGeorge et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080129243 | Nashiki | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080179980 | Dawsey et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20090045691 | Ichiyama | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090121669 | Hanada | May 2009 | A1 |
20090128072 | Strong et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090146615 | Zillmer et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090179608 | Welchko et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090306841 | Miwa et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100010724 | Tripathi et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100201294 | Yuuki et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100296671 | Khoury et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20110029179 | Miyazaki et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110089774 | Kramer | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110101812 | Finkle et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110130916 | Mayer | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110208405 | Tripathi et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20120056569 | Takamatsu et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120112674 | Schulz et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120169263 | Gallegos-Lopez et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120217916 | Wu et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120217921 | Wu et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20130134912 | Khalil et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130141027 | Nakata | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130226420 | Pedlar et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130241445 | Tang | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130258734 | Nakano et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20140018988 | Kitano et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140028225 | Takamatsu et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140130506 | Gale et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140176034 | Matsumura et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140217940 | Kawamura | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140265957 | Hu et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140292382 | Ogawa et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140354199 | Zeng et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20150025725 | Uchida | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150240404 | Kim et al. | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150246685 | Dixon et al. | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20150261422 | Den et al. | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20150297824 | Cabiri et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150318803 | Wu et al. | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20160114830 | Dixon et al. | Apr 2016 | A1 |
20160226409 | Ogawa | Aug 2016 | A1 |
20160233812 | Lee et al. | Aug 2016 | A1 |
20160269225 | Kirchmeier et al. | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20160373047 | Loken et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20170087990 | Neti et al. | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170163108 | Schencke et al. | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20170205778 | Barrass et al. | Jul 2017 | A1 |
20170331402 | Smith et al. | Nov 2017 | A1 |
20180032047 | Nishizono et al. | Feb 2018 | A1 |
20180045771 | Kim et al. | Feb 2018 | A1 |
20180154786 | Wang et al. | Jun 2018 | A1 |
20180276913 | Garcia et al. | Sep 2018 | A1 |
20180323665 | Chen et al. | Nov 2018 | A1 |
20180334038 | Zhao et al. | Nov 2018 | A1 |
20190058374 | Enomoto et al. | Feb 2019 | A1 |
20190288629 | Tripathi | Sep 2019 | A1 |
20190288631 | Tripathi | Sep 2019 | A1 |
20190341820 | Krizan et al. | Nov 2019 | A1 |
20200212834 | Mazda et al. | Jul 2020 | A1 |
20200262398 | Sato et al. | Aug 2020 | A1 |
20200328714 | Tripathi | Oct 2020 | A1 |
20200343849 | Coroban-Schramel | Oct 2020 | A1 |
20200366223 | Coroban-Schramel | Nov 2020 | A1 |
20210146909 | Serrano et al. | May 2021 | A1 |
20210203263 | Serrano et al. | Jul 2021 | A1 |
20210351733 | Carvell | Nov 2021 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1829070 | Sep 2006 | CN |
102381265 | Mar 2012 | CN |
104716754 | Jun 2015 | CN |
204589885 | Aug 2015 | CN |
105196877 | Dec 2015 | CN |
205229379 | May 2016 | CN |
106932208 | Jul 2017 | CN |
107067780 | Aug 2017 | CN |
207129052 | Mar 2018 | CN |
108216026 | Jun 2018 | CN |
108445386 | Aug 2018 | CN |
110212725 | Sep 2019 | CN |
102014206342 | Oct 2015 | DE |
2605398 | Jun 2013 | EP |
2989479 | Oct 2013 | FR |
2273212 | Aug 1994 | GB |
10243680 | Sep 1998 | JP |
2008-079686 | Apr 2008 | JP |
2009-065758 | Mar 2009 | JP |
2009-118544 | May 2009 | JP |
2011-67043 | Mar 2011 | JP |
2014-033449 | Feb 2014 | JP |
2017-011970 | Jan 2017 | JP |
2017-200382 | Nov 2017 | JP |
2018-033250 | Mar 2018 | JP |
2019-202603 | Nov 2019 | JP |
10-2014-0038841 | Mar 2014 | KR |
10-2017-0021146 | Feb 2017 | KR |
10-2017-0032976 | Mar 2017 | KR |
WO0336787 | May 2003 | WO |
WO2012-010993 | Jan 2012 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Chen et al.; Optimizing Electric Motor Controls with Dynamic Motor Drive; 30th Aachen Colloquium Sustainable Mobility 2021 (Year: 2021). |
Cai et al., “Torque Ripple Reduction for Switched Reluctance Motor with Optimized PWM Control Strategy”, https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/11/11/3215, Oct. 15, 2018, 27 pages. |
Spong et al., “Feedback Linearizing Control of Switched Reluctance Motors”, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. AC-32, No. 5, May 1987, pp. 371-379. |
Srinivasan, U.S. Appl. No. 17/188,509, filed Mar. 1, 2021. |
Ramsey, “How This Father and Son's New Electric Turbine Could Revolutionize Electric Cars; Hunstable Electric Turbine can Produce up to Three Times the Torque of Any Other Motor”, https://www.parsintl.com/publication/autoblog/, Mar. 8, 2020. |
Mirzaeva et al., “The use of Feedback Quantizer PWM for Shaping Inverter Noise Spectrum”, Power Electronics and Motion Control Conference (EPE/PEMC), 2012 15th International IEEE, Sep. 4, 2012, pp. DS3c. 10-1, XP032311951, DOI: 10.1109/EPEPEMC.2012.6397346, ISBN: 978-1-4673-1970.6. |
Luckjiff et al., “Hexagonal ΣΔ Modulators in Power Electronics”, IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, USA, vol. 20, No. 5, Sep. 1, 2005, pp. 1075-1083, XP011138680, ISSN: 0885-8993, DOI: 10.1109/TPEL.2005.854029. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Apr. 18, 2022 from International Application No. PCT/US2021/063876. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20220234451 A1 | Jul 2022 | US |