The present invention relates to a pulverizer also known as a vertical grinding mill which are provided with a rotating shaft with a plurality of arms spinning thereabout which generate a series of air currents inside of a cylinder to pulverize, separate, aerate, and/or homogenize material.
Solid materials such as garbage, rubbish or other solid materials have been collected by trucks and transported for disposal for many years.
Burkett developed a centrifugal mill sometime around in the mid-1970s and ended up with U.S. Pat. No. 3,987,970 and others. The applicant's predecessor-in-interest filed Canadian Patent Application Nos. 2,125,797 and 2,147,666 for use with various equipment and methods for pulverizing rock and remediating soil utilizing an improved pulverizer configuration. All three of these patents/applications are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.
Still others have commercialized an embodiment of the Burkett mill and are trying to sell that design in the marketplace today. However, when attempting to build a Burkett mill with improvements, the applicant discovered there were components of that basic design which could be improved.
It is the present object of many embodiments of the present invention to provide an improved vertical gyroscopic mill or pulverizer having advanced capabilities.
It is another object of many embodiments of the present invention to provide an improved pulverizer having improved safety features.
It is another object of many embodiments of the present invention to provide an improved pulverizer having improved performance characteristics.
It is another object of many embodiments of the present invention to provide improved efficiency, possibly coupled to increased output and/or reduced down time.
It is another object of many embodiments to provide improved performance for a pulverizer by having adjustable air flow characteristics other than adjustable shaft rotation speed alone.
It is another object of many embodiments of the present invention to provide an improved shaft wrapping removal system.
It is another object of many embodiments of the present invention to provide an improved dust collection system.
Accordingly, in accordance with a presently preferred embodiment of the present invention, a pulverizer or vertical gyroscopic mill can be combined with a conveyor system for (a) feeding the pulverizer and/or (b) likely for removing discharge. The speed of the conveyor(s), particularly the feed conveyor, as well as the speed of the rotation of the pulverizer are preferably controlled by a processor possibly in an interrelated manner. Furthermore, the shaft may be driven by a variable frequency drive motor or other variable speed motor to allow for the processor to control aspects of the speed of the motor. Feedback loops are helpful for some operations of the processor as well, such as to maintain constant power levels and/or feed flows.
A system may control the rate of infeed to at least assist in controlling the process for at least some embodiments.
A system may control the speed of the rotor for some embodiments such as to maintain a specified power level and/or for other objectives.
Additionally, for at least some embodiments, it may be that the speed of the motor and the speed of the conveyor can be linked together so that if the speed of the shaft rotation of the pulverizer is sensed to decrease, then the speed of the conveyor can be correspondingly decreased as well, such as a proportional amount, possibly as compared to overall speeds, amount of decrease or other amounts. Furthermore, if a high resistant object is encountered with an arm and the shaft speed slows down a significant amount, it may be that the processor can direct the ramping back up of the shaft speed after a sudden slow down possibly as well as a corresponding slowing down and then speeding up of the conveyor.
For some embodiments, a vibration sensor can be used to detect when the shaft and/or other components of the pulverizer are vibrating too much to then direct a potential shut down sub-routine to determine the cause of the vibration. The vibration could be caused by unbalanced loading, which could be addressed by first slowing, and then possibly stopping the feed conveyor. The shaft may be slowed slightly, or significantly to see if the vibration clears. Finally, if none of the above slows the vibration issue, the shaft may be stopped.
Additionally, software of at least some embodiments can detect wrapping by sensing an increase in amperage possibly coupled with other effects such as no significant increase or decrease in output or throughput and/or other effects. Once detecting a wrapping step, the processor may stop the shaft. After stopping the feed conveyor, the processor may direct a reverse direction of the shaft for a predetermined speed and/or time (or alternating directions) to allow attempt to dislodge material from wrapped arms. Similarly, if resistance is deemed too low, the processor can speed up certain factors.
Additionally, in an effort to prevent shaft wrapping which can often occur with the top of the pulverizer above the uppermost arm segments, at least one cutting mechanism can be provided in an effort to attempt to cut material which may otherwise wrap towards an upper end of the shaft.
A door opening prevention separator lock for many embodiments can be provided to prevent an access door of the pulverizer from being opened while in operation, or even during spin down after shutting off the pulverizer. Once the shaft is stopped, the interlock may then allow the access door to open.
Additionally, software can be used to maintain the environment of pressure below ambient such as at some vacuum value possibly in combination with a dust depression system at an outlet of the pulverizer possibly with a separator lock option at the outlet so as to prevent, or at least significantly reduce dust in the environment to reduce dust about the pulverizer during operation.
Still these and/or other features may be provided with still other embodiments.
The particular features and advantages of the invention as well as other objects will become apparent from the following description taken in connection with the accompanying drawings in which:
Dust collector system 24 is useful for some, if not many embodiments, to remove dust and will be described in further detail with reference back to
The pulverizer 16 is preferably equipped with a variable speed motor 28 such as a variable frequency drive motor which can allow for the processor 26 to assist in controlling the speed of the motor 28. Additionally, the processor 26 may also control the speed of feed of the conveyor 12.
For instance, by having a processor 26 control operation of both the feed (i.e., the amount of fed material) into inlet 14 by controlling the speed of the conveyor 12, possibly in combination with sensors such as sensor 30 directed at conveyor 12 which can sense the input of material into inlet 14. The amount of feed directed into the pulverizer 16 through inlet 14 can be monitored and/or controlled possibly in combination with the speed of rotation of the shaft 32 in an effort to address a variety of different operating conditions.
For instance, during normal operations, if a particular hard grind product is directed into inlet 14, the shaft 32 may reduce rotational speed about rotation axis 34. In order to ramp back up to optimal, it may be that the processor 26 has a ramp up speed routine as provided to the motor 28 so that instead of attempting to instantaneously maintain speed, either a predetermined ramp up routine is selected such as a linear increase or non-linear curve back to speed or possibly having a predetermined intermediate speeds back up to an optimum speed is achieved by the processor 26 running software as provided therewith. Conveyor 12 may follow a similar or dissimilar routine.
Another aspect of the pulverizing system 100 is that the input as provided through inlet 14 can be varied, possibly together with the speed of rotation of the shaft 32 by the motor 28 under certain operating conditions as well. Depending on the particular type of input in inlet 14, a different rate of feed of the conveyor 12 can be selected relative to the speed of the rotation of the shaft 32 about axis 34. Other factors may be addressed with processor 26 to attempt to improve efficiency as well.
Depending on the particular input at issue, it may be that the speed of rotation of the shaft 32 can be selected relative to the speed of the conveyor 12 and/or vice versa and/or the amount of input in inlet 14 possibly in combination with the sensor 30 or other way to measure input into inlet 14. Another feature which can be controlled with the pulverizer 16 is its internal pressure which may be assisted in being controlled by a dust collection system 24 or other system. By directing the pressure inside pulverizer 16 to possibly be below atmospheric pressure such as by using the dust control system 24, the relative size of particulate leaving the outlet 18 can be reduced. Under certain circumstances, the particulate size as deposited from the outlet conveyor 22 may be more preferably controlled by addressing a pressure in the pulverizer 16, such as with processor 26. Of course, outlet conveyor 22 could have material redirected back into inlet 14 under certain conditions to regrind material and/or could be controlled by processor 26 as well. Dust collection system 24 could be useful to prevent the area around the pulverizer 16 from being a dusty mess. Dust collecting system 24 may also collect useful products from the grinding operation.
Also, when the shaft 32 is ramping back up to speed as directed by the processor but the processor 26 may also simultaneously slow down the conveyor 12 and/or maintain a predetermined speed during the ramp up process so as to not overload the input in the inlet 14 of the pulverizer 16.
Also, the processor 26 may perform other functions like direct the flow of input into inlet 14 in order to attempt to maintain a relatively stable power level based on consumption of energy of either the overall system and/or by the motor 28.
For instance, when encountering an increased power consumption by the motor 28, it may be that the input is slowed such as by slowing the conveyor 12 or other step. Furthermore if power consumption is not significant enough as consumed the motor 28, it may be that the conveyor 12 can be sped up by the processor 26.
In addition to providing instructions to control both the speed of the motor 28, to thus control the rotational speed of the shaft 32, as well as the speed of the conveyor 12, it may be that there is a feed back loop provided back to the processor 26 for various effects. For instance, it has been discovered that through shelf height optimization, as will be described in further detail below, it may be that a higher throughput (i.e., a higher rate of flow from both into the inlet 14 and outlet 18) can be achieved with a lower power consumption of the motor 28 based on the shelf 36 being provided at a selected height provided through way of adjustment. A 20% higher throughput has been achieved for some feed streams by selecting the specific height of the shelf 36 for some embodiments. By changing the shelf 36 height, the vortices flow in at least the middle section 38 can be varied to effectively change the configuration of those vortices, at least elevationally. Furthermore, it may be that the change in shelf height 36 it may be imparted to the other shelves namely 40 and/or 42 and/or other shelves which could be changed in height as well. Additionally, the relative shape of deflectors or shelves 36, 40, 42 such as deflector 44 in a similar or dissimilar manner as the shelf 36 is changed in height as will be explained in further detail below.
By providing a feedback route such as with an accelerometer 46 connected to the shaft 32 as well as a variable speed motor 28 such as could be driven by a variable frequency drive system or otherwise, a way of not only providing a desired signal to the motor 28 for a desired speed of the shaft 32 can be provided, but also the speed itself can be sensed with sensor 46 and provided to processor 26.
Other sensors can be utilized with this system which are not presently utilized. Specifically, a door locking interlock and/or sensor 48 can be provided for use by processor 26 or other device so that access door 50 so that the door 50 may not be opened as illustrated in
If the vibration sensor 54 detects the shaft 32 as sensing too much vibration, then it could indicate that a pin is sheared, an arm pad has been damaged, or other complicating factor internal to the pulverizer 16 which could then be somewhat of a self-diagnosing pulverizer 16. If a second predetermined amount of vibration is sensed, it may be that the motor 28 is secured immediately as opposed to going through a slowing step to discourage internal damage in the pulverizer 16.
Of course, the processor 26 could also control the air lock 20, if utilized, as well as the speed of being able to move material onto conveyor 22 and/or the speed of the conveyor 22. Processor 26 may also control the air flow through the dust controller system 24 if utilized and/or could assist in maintaining a desired pressure such as a vacuum or other pressure internal to the pulverizer 16 and/or assist in maximizing efficiency of the fan 56 of the dust collector 24 for efficiency or other purposes such as removing dust of a given particulate size.
Fan 56 might be a 30 horsepower motor capable of drawing 1000 cubic feet per minute or have other specifications for various other dust collector systems 24. It turns out that for many processes, the dust collected in various bags 58 can prove to be quite valuable such as when grounding electronics, it may be that gold dust can be retrieved from the bags 56, 58. Other waste may have other valuable components which may be recovered from waste bags 58. Plenum 60 could be made of the appropriate gauge of material to be able to withstand the suction forces as provided by fan 56 and it may be that the amount of suction can be varied such as not only with the speed of the fan 56 but also with the size of the opening 62 as will be discussed in further detail with reference to
The software used by the processor 26 could detect wrapping such as by sensing an increase of amperage without noticing any increase in output 18 and/or input 14 and/or possibly also observing that the amperage is slowly increasing by the motor 28 as it being required by the motor 28. Vibration sensed by the vibration sensor 54 may also contribute to the ability to detect wrapping.
If wrapping is occurring on the arms, such as any of arms 64, 66, 68, then a routine can be employed to attempt to shed the wrap material from the arms. Specifically, the shaft 32 could be stopped as shown by processor and possibly even the arms 64-68 could then be reversed in direction to attempt to free the arms 64-68 from the wrap material. It may be that a series of spinning in the first direction about the axis and then reversing direction about the axis 34 may be employed in order to attempt to remove such material. Should this step fail to work, then it may be that the door 50 might need to be opened or the shafts 32 stopped to remove any excess wrapped material.
Additionally, if wrapping up on the shaft 32 such as at any of the hubs or even towards the upper portion 74 of pulverizer 16, a shaft wrapping removal system could be employed similar to the one shown in
The cone 72 when utilized works as a shedding cone to assist the direction of such materials up into the cutting area of the shaft wrapping removal device illustrated. An access plate 82 may be useful to be able to open the access either the first or second cutting blade 76, 80 possibly from outside the pulverizer 16 for adjustment and/or replacement. The cone 72 can be a shedding cone and can further assist in the ability to direct material up to the cutting surfaces of the blade 76 and/or 80. The cone 72 has a larger diameter at a bottom of the cone 72 and increases in diameter before going downwardly.
Accordingly, some embodiments provide a pulverizer 16 comprising a top 1 with an inlet 14, and a conveyor 12 feeding an inlet 14 at the top, a bottom 3, a drum 5 located between the top 1 to the bottom 3, a rotating shaft 32 having radially extending arms 64, 66, 68 creating flow currents within the pulverizer thereby reducing the size of product input at the inlet 14 and discharged at the bottom 3 at exit 18, and a processor 26 directing the speed of at least one, if not both, of (a) the shaft 32 and (b) the conveyor 12 based at least partially on input of sensors 30 and/or 46, and/or others. A variable speed motor 28, such as a variable frequency drive motor or other motor, directed by the processor 26 may drive the shaft. The processor 26 may be used for other functions such as at least assist in controlling pressure in the drum of the pressurizer 16 such as by controlling a dust collection system 24, possibly having a variable vacuum controlled by the processor 26. Another processor function may be directing the rotation of the shaft 32 in one of a forward and a reverse direction based on detected wrapping of debris about one of the shaft and the arms 64, 66, 68.
Some embodiments may provide a shaft speed sensor 46 and further comprising a feed back loop communicating shaft speed to the processor 26. These or other embodiments may provide a door interlock 48 whereby the processor 26 prevents opening an access door 50 to the drum when the shaft 32 is rotating. These or other embodiments may provide a vibration sensor such as 46 with the processor 26 directing slowing down the pulverizer 16 if vibration exceeds a first predetermined threshold, and/or stopping the pulverizer 16 if vibration exceeds a second predetermined threshold.
Some embodiments may provide a wrap detection algorithm used by the processor 26 whereby wrapping of material about the arms 64, 66, 68 is detected by performance of the pulverizer 16. Some algorithms may employ sensing at least one of an increase in amperage required by the motor 28, slowing down of the shaft and increased vibration such as may be sensed by sensor 46 and/or another sensor. If wrapping about the shaft 32 is detected, some embodiments may provide, the pulverizer 16 reverses direction of rotation of the shaft 32, at least briefly in an effort to dislodge wrapped material on the arms 64-68. Spacing ribs 70 and/or a shedding cone 72 located in the drum 5 toward the inlet 16 at the top 1, or upper portion 74 of the pulverizer 16, may be useful to discourage wrapping for many embodiments as well. With the shedding cone 72, for at least some embodiments, at least one blade 76 or 80 near a top of the cone 72 may assist in cutting debris which might otherwise wrap about the shaft 32. Still other embodiments may have some, or all of these features, as well as, or even others.
Numerous alterations of the structure herein disclosed will suggest themselves to those skilled in the art. However, it is to be understood that the present disclosure relates to the preferred embodiment of the invention which is for purposes of illustration only and not to be construed as a limitation of the invention. All such modifications which do not depart from the spirit of the invention are intended to be included within the scope of the appended claims.
The present application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 62/279,309 filed Jan. 15, 2016, which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
375 | Smith | Sep 1837 | A |
7000 | Goshon | Jan 1850 | A |
56672 | Heneage | Jul 1866 | A |
125172 | Chichester | Apr 1872 | A |
134513 | Chichester | Jan 1873 | A |
248923 | Dechamp | Nov 1881 | A |
277138 | Knight | May 1883 | A |
441372 | Morse | Nov 1890 | A |
499795 | Morse | Jun 1893 | A |
964102 | Gordon | Jul 1910 | A |
1048869 | Pitcairn | Dec 1912 | A |
1178386 | Edwards | Apr 1916 | A |
1197888 | Adams | Sep 1916 | A |
1212418 | Sturtevant | Jan 1917 | A |
1212419 | Sturtevant | Jan 1917 | A |
1300192 | Overstrom | Apr 1919 | A |
1608717 | Bell | Nov 1926 | A |
1636033 | Agnew | Jul 1927 | A |
1656756 | Payne | Jan 1928 | A |
1669239 | Grindle | May 1928 | A |
1758010 | Pettinos | May 1930 | A |
1798465 | Grindle | Mar 1931 | A |
1911193 | Hill | May 1933 | A |
1935344 | Andrews et al. | Nov 1933 | A |
2012694 | Runyan | Aug 1935 | A |
2092307 | Gaffney | Sep 1937 | A |
2093703 | Blodgett | Sep 1937 | A |
2125797 | Marino | Aug 1938 | A |
2130064 | Bucky | Sep 1938 | A |
2147666 | Park | Feb 1939 | A |
2164409 | Johnson | Jul 1939 | A |
2171525 | Ainsa | Sep 1939 | A |
2248927 | Ainsa | Jul 1941 | A |
2259939 | Garcia | Oct 1941 | A |
2275595 | Schwartz | Mar 1942 | A |
2355784 | Dondlinger | Aug 1944 | A |
2367906 | Wall et al. | Jan 1945 | A |
2392958 | Tice | Jan 1946 | A |
2546286 | Zakel | Mar 1951 | A |
2562560 | Macartney | Jul 1951 | A |
2592994 | Ahlmann | Apr 1952 | A |
2595117 | Ahlmann | Apr 1952 | A |
2639747 | Burn et al. | May 1953 | A |
2700512 | Denovan et al. | Jan 1955 | A |
2707594 | Moore | May 1955 | A |
2709552 | Lecher | May 1955 | A |
2713977 | Noll | Jul 1955 | A |
2750120 | Pallmann | Jun 1956 | A |
2847168 | Smiley | Aug 1958 | A |
2917248 | Krug et al. | Dec 1959 | A |
2919864 | Parmele | Jan 1960 | A |
2937815 | Eirich et al. | May 1960 | A |
2940676 | Brake | Jun 1960 | A |
2981489 | Hannum, Jr. | Apr 1961 | A |
2992783 | Wirth et al. | Jul 1961 | A |
3015392 | Rozsa et al. | Jan 1962 | A |
3062459 | Dearing | Nov 1962 | A |
3065919 | Le Roy Burkett et al. | Nov 1962 | A |
3071330 | Jackering | Jan 1963 | A |
3123115 | Howard | Mar 1964 | A |
3155326 | Rhodes | Nov 1964 | A |
3160354 | Le Roy Burkett | Dec 1964 | A |
3180582 | Danyluke | Apr 1965 | A |
3207447 | Whitham | Sep 1965 | A |
3210016 | Sevin et al. | Oct 1965 | A |
3302895 | Ryder | Feb 1967 | A |
3326476 | De Los Santos Izquierdo | Jun 1967 | A |
3329350 | Wisgerhof et al. | Jul 1967 | A |
3346203 | Danyluke | Oct 1967 | A |
3426673 | Miner et al. | Feb 1969 | A |
3474974 | Wood | Oct 1969 | A |
3490704 | Bourne et al. | Jan 1970 | A |
3555996 | Schwarz et al. | Jan 1971 | A |
3615008 | Alpha | Oct 1971 | A |
3834631 | King | Sep 1974 | A |
3873034 | Iwahori et al. | Mar 1975 | A |
3887141 | Francis | Jun 1975 | A |
3946953 | Hato | Mar 1976 | A |
3976002 | Gerlach | Aug 1976 | A |
3987970 | Burkett | Oct 1976 | A |
4030670 | Abernathy | Jun 1977 | A |
4098466 | Macelvain et al. | Jul 1978 | A |
4144167 | Burkett et al. | Mar 1979 | A |
4151794 | Burkett | May 1979 | A |
4151959 | Deister | May 1979 | A |
4202078 | Malinak | May 1980 | A |
4493459 | Burkett | Jan 1985 | A |
4529134 | Williams | Jul 1985 | A |
4531461 | Sayler et al. | Jul 1985 | A |
4593861 | Blakley et al. | Jun 1986 | A |
4637561 | Edberg | Jan 1987 | A |
4690338 | Sayler et al. | Sep 1987 | A |
4886216 | Goble | Dec 1989 | A |
4988045 | Griesedieck, III | Jan 1991 | A |
4989796 | Eide | Feb 1991 | A |
5067661 | Eide | Nov 1991 | A |
5184781 | Andela | Feb 1993 | A |
5192029 | Harris | Mar 1993 | A |
5205500 | Eide | Apr 1993 | A |
5285973 | Goforth et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
5379951 | Hughes | Jan 1995 | A |
5680994 | Eide et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5685500 | Eide et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5839671 | Sand et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5881959 | Hadjinian | Mar 1999 | A |
6024307 | Sand et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6135370 | Arnold | Oct 2000 | A |
6179231 | Csendes | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6227473 | Arnold | May 2001 | B1 |
6325306 | Gacanich | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6726133 | Hahn et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
7222805 | Williams, Jr. | May 2007 | B1 |
7950601 | Watts | May 2011 | B2 |
8020791 | Knueven et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8267337 | Webb | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8678306 | Watts | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8931721 | Jensen et al. | Jan 2015 | B2 |
9205431 | Anderson | Dec 2015 | B2 |
9498780 | Watts et al. | Nov 2016 | B2 |
9707564 | Mogan et al. | Jul 2017 | B2 |
9751087 | Watts et al. | Sep 2017 | B2 |
20020117564 | Hahn | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20160045919 | McDaniel | Feb 2016 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
103934085 | Jul 2014 | CN |
105833944 | Aug 2016 | CN |
0202424 | Aug 1990 | EP |
0525362 | Oct 1994 | EP |
1989008752 | Sep 1989 | WO |
1993002797 | Feb 1993 | WO |
1998055234 | Dec 1998 | WO |
2008131477 | Nov 2008 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20190001340 A1 | Jan 2019 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62279309 | Jan 2016 | US |