Coal gasification involves the conversion of coal or other carbon-containing solids into synthesis gas. While both dry coal and water slurry are used in the gasification process, dry coal pumping may be more thermally efficient than water slurry technology.
In order to streamline the process and increase the mechanical efficiency of dry coal gasification, a particulate material extrusion pump is utilized to pump pulverized carbon-based fuel such as dry coal. The pulverized carbon-based fuel downstream of the particulate material extrusion pump requires breaker mills, ball end mills or other pulverization machines to deconsolidate the dry coal.
A pump apparatus according to one non-limiting embodiment of the present disclosure includes a particulate pump defining a passage extending from an inlet to an outlet and a duct in flow communication with the outlet. The duct includes a deconsolidator configured to fragment particle agglomerates received from the passage.
In a further non-limiting embodiment of any of the examples herein, the deconsolidator is selected from the group consisting of a grinder, a vibrator, a mesh, a divider and combinations thereof.
In a further non-limiting embodiment of any of the examples herein, the duct is connected at the outlet of the passage.
In a further non-limiting embodiment of any of the examples herein, the duct includes a duct outlet and a movable door having open and closed positions with respect to the duct outlet.
In a further non-limiting embodiment of any of the examples herein, the deconsolidator is a divider splitting the duct into multiple passages.
In a further non-limiting embodiment of any of the examples herein, the multiple passages turn laterally with respect to the passage of the particulate pump.
In a further non-limiting embodiment of any of the examples herein, the multiple passages are laterally offset from each other.
In a further non-limiting embodiment of any of the examples herein, the deconsolidator includes a grinder.
In a further non-limiting embodiment of any of the examples herein, the deconsolidator includes a vibrator.
In a further non-limiting embodiment of any of the examples herein, the deconsolidator includes a mesh.
In a further non-limiting embodiment of any of the examples herein, the duct includes a hard-face coating.
A pump apparatus according to a non-limiting embodiment of the present disclosure includes a particulate pump defining a passage extending from an inlet and an outlet and a duct in flow communication with the outlet. The duct includes a duct outlet and a moveable door having open and closed positions with respect to the duct outlet.
In a further non-limiting embodiment of any of the examples herein, the movable door is biased toward the closed position.
In a further non-limiting embodiment of any of the examples herein, the movable door is movable in response to a pressure in the duct exceeding a threshold.
In a further non-limiting embodiment of any of the examples herein, the movable door is moveable by non-electronic actuation.
In a further non-limiting embodiment of any of the examples herein, the movable door seals against the duct outlet in the closed position.
A method of operating a pump apparatus according to a non-limiting embodiment of the present disclosure includes moving a particulate material through a particulate pump that defines a passage that extends from an inlet to an outlet and fragmenting particle agglomerates of the particulate material with a deconsolidator in a duct that is in flow communication with the outlet of the passage.
A further non-limiting embodiment of any of the examples herein includes controlling discharge of the particulate material from the duct by actuating a movable door between open and closed positions with respect to a duct outlet of the duct.
In a further non-limiting embodiment of any of the examples herein, the actuating includes actuating the movable door in response to a pressure in the duct.
A further non-limiting embodiment of any of the examples herein includes maintaining the movable door in the closed position in response to the pressure in the duct being below a threshold, to limit a backflow of pressure into the duct.
The various features and advantages of the present disclosure will become apparent to those skilled in the art from the following detailed description. The drawings that accompany the detailed description can be briefly described as follows.
The gasifier 22 includes an injector 30 to receive and inject the carbonaceous particulate material and an oxidant into the interior volume of the gasifier 22. As an example, the injector 30 is an impingement-style, jet injector. The carbonaceous particulate material combusts within the gasifier 22 to produce the syngas, which may then be provided downstream to one or more filters for further processing, as is known.
Although the pump apparatus 26 is discussed herein with regard to moving carbonaceous particulate material, the pump apparatus 26 may be used in other systems to transport other types of particulate material in various industries, such as petrochemical, electrical power, food and agricultural. That is, the pump apparatus 26 is not limited to use with coal, carbonaceous materials or gasification, and any industry that processes particulate material may benefit from the pump apparatus 26.
In this example, the passage 34 includes a cross-sectional area, as represented by dimension 34a, which is substantially constant between the inlet 36 and the outlet 38 of the particulate pump 32. That is, the cross-sectional area does not vary by more than 10% along the length of the passage 34.
It is to be understood that the particulate pump 32 can alternatively be another type of particulate pump. As an example, the particulate pump 32 is a moving-wall pump, a piston pump, a screw pump, a centrifugal pump, a radial pump, an axial pump or other type of mechanical pump configured to move particulate material. One example moving-wall pump is disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 7,387,197, incorporated herein by reference. Further, in operation, the inlet 36 may be at a first pressure and the outlet 38 may be at a second pressure that is greater than the first fluid pressure such that the particulate pump 32 moves the particulate material from a low pressure area to a higher pressure area.
A duct 40 (shown schematically) is coupled at the outlet 38 of the particulate pump 32. The duct 40 includes deconsolidator 42 configured to fragment particle agglomerates received from the passage 34. The duct 40 and/or deconsolidator 42 may be part of the particulate pump 32 or a separate part from the particulate pump 32. On average, the particulate material discharged from the pump apparatus 26 should have a similar size to the size of the particulate material before entering the pump apparatus 26. However, the particulate material can agglomerate into larger lumps or blocks due to compression at the sidewalls of the passage 34 of the particulate pump 32. The agglomerates can cause blockages further downstream in the gasifier system 20, such as at the injector 30.
The degree of agglomeration can depend upon various coal parameters, such as porosity, Hardgrove Grindability Index (HGI), surface energy, flow rate and discharge pressure. The deconsolidator 42 serves to apply shear forces to the particulate material, which fragments agglomerates that may form. Furthermore, the ability to fragment agglomerates permits the use of different feedstocks such as petcoke, coal from different mine sources, sub-bit coal or the like without the need to replace hardware on the pump apparatus 26 to account for different levels of agglomeration of different feedstocks.
In this example, the duct 40 also includes a movable door 52 (
The movable door 52 is mounted on a door support structure 54 for linear movement, as represented at 56, between open and closed positions. The movable door 52 includes a plate 58 with guide bosses 60 extending therefrom. The guide bosses 60 are slideably supported on respective struts 62 of the support structure 54. The struts 62 house bias members 64 (shown schematically), such as springs, for biasing the movable door 52 toward the closed position shown in
Referring to
In this example, the movable door 52 actuates by non-electronic actuation and in response to a pressure in the duct 40 exceeding a threshold. Thus, the moveable door 52 operates passively, without the need for external electronic control signals. For example, in operation of the pump apparatus 26, particulate material moves through the passage 34 and into the duct 40. A build-up of particulate material in the duct 40 causes a pressure increase within the duct 40. Once the pressure exceeds the threshold pressure necessary to overcome the biasing force of the bias member 64, the movable door 52 slides on the struts 62 from the closed position to the open position at 52′.
Once open, the particulate material discharges through the duct outlet 50 and into the high pressure tank 28. Upon release of particulate material into the high pressure tank 28, the pressure within the duct 40 decreases and the bias member 64 moves the movable door 52 back into the closed position, sealing the duct outlet 50. A backflow of pressure can go through a plug of the particulate material that forms in the passage 34 of the particulate pump 32 and discharge as a stream of particulate material from the inlet 36 of the particulate pump 32. However, in the closed, sealed position, the moveable door 52 limits or prevents pressure backflow through the duct 40 and into the particulate pump 32, which facilitates isolation of the low pressure environment at the inlet 36 from the high pressure environment at the outlet 38 and improves operation of the particulate pump 32 by reducing the need to re-pressurize the low pressure environment due to undesired pressure losses.
Additionally, in this example, the duct 240 includes a hard-face coating 270 that lines the passages 46a/46b to protect against erosion, corrosion and the like. In one example, the hard-face coating 270 is an anodized coating on an aluminum substrate that forms the geometry of the duct 240. In other examples, the hard-face coating 270 can have a different composition, but is harder than the underlying substrate on which it is disposed. As can be appreciated, any of the hard-face coating 270 is also applicable to any of the other examples herein.
Moreover, the use of the movable door reduces backflow of high pressure coal or gases in the system, which may otherwise hinder the feed of the coal particulate material or cause shutdown of system. Additionally, the duct and deconsolidators disclosed herein can be retrofit onto an existing particulate pump in response to a change in feedstock, flow rate, etc. In some examples, the duct and deconsolidator requires minimal energy input, which reduce auxiliary loads on the particulate pump.
The particulate pump 1000 generally includes an inlet zone 1012, a compression work zone 1014 and an outlet zone 1016. The inlet zone 1012 generally includes a hopper 1018 and an inlet 1020. The compression work zone 1014 generally includes a passageway 1022 defined by a moving wall 1024 and drives system 1026 therefor. The outlet zone 1016 generally includes an outlet 1028 and a deconsolidation device 1030.
The deconsolidation device 1030 deconsolidates the coal which may be consolidated within the passageway 1022 by the moving wall 1024. That is, the pulverized carbon-based fuel may be tightly compacted from the passageway 1022. The pulverized carbon-based fuel has a natural angle of repose. That is, a natural angle forms between the horizontal at the top of a pile of unconsolidated material, and the sides. The consolidated pulverized carbon-based fuel has been compressed into a state where the particulate adhere to each other forming a mass which may stand vertically unsupported at angles higher than the natural angle of repose. Partially deconsolidated material may have a natural angle of repose but still consist of a mixture of unconsolidated and consolidated material that may be further reduced by shearing the largest particle masses against each other or the surfaces of a device.
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
The coal deconsolidation device 1030 allows the particulate pump 1000 to operate without heretofore required breaker mills, ball end mills or other moving pulverization machines.
Although a combination of features is shown in the illustrated examples, not all of them need to be combined to realize the benefits of various embodiments of this disclosure. In other words, a system designed according to an embodiment of this disclosure will not necessarily include all of the features shown in any one of the Figures or all of the portions schematically shown in the Figures. Moreover, selected features of one example embodiment may be combined with selected features of other example embodiments.
The preceding description is exemplary rather than limiting in nature. Variations and modifications to the disclosed examples may become apparent to those skilled in the art that do not necessarily depart from the essence of this disclosure. The scope of legal protection given to this disclosure can only be determined by studying the following claims.
This application is a continuation-in-part of U.S. application Ser. No. 12/758,846, filed on Apr. 13, 2010.
This invention was made with government support under contract number DE FC26-04NT42237 awarded by United States Department of Energy. The government has certain rights in the invention.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1011589 | Curtis | Dec 1911 | A |
3245517 | Ward | Apr 1966 | A |
3844398 | Pinat | Oct 1974 | A |
3856658 | Wolk et al. | Dec 1974 | A |
3950147 | Funk et al. | Apr 1976 | A |
4069911 | Ray | Jan 1978 | A |
4191500 | Oberg et al. | Mar 1980 | A |
4197092 | Bretz | Apr 1980 | A |
4206610 | Santhanam | Jun 1980 | A |
4206713 | Ryason | Jun 1980 | A |
4218222 | Nolan, Jr. et al. | Aug 1980 | A |
4356078 | Heavin et al. | Oct 1982 | A |
4377356 | Santhanam | Mar 1983 | A |
4391561 | Smith et al. | Jul 1983 | A |
4433947 | Kratzer et al. | Feb 1984 | A |
4488838 | Herud | Dec 1984 | A |
4516674 | Firth | May 1985 | A |
4605352 | Scott et al. | Aug 1986 | A |
4611646 | Wassmer et al. | Sep 1986 | A |
4721420 | Santhanam et al. | Jan 1988 | A |
4765781 | Wilks et al. | Aug 1988 | A |
4963065 | Scott et al. | Oct 1990 | A |
4988239 | Firth | Jan 1991 | A |
5051041 | Firth | Sep 1991 | A |
5094340 | Avakov | Mar 1992 | A |
5186111 | Baria | Feb 1993 | A |
5273556 | McMahon et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
5325603 | Eastham et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5402876 | Hay | Apr 1995 | A |
5435433 | Jordan et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5485909 | Hay | Jan 1996 | A |
5492216 | McCoy et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5497873 | Hay | Mar 1996 | A |
5533650 | Conrad et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5551553 | Hay | Sep 1996 | A |
5558473 | Lindahl | Sep 1996 | A |
6152668 | Knoch | Nov 2000 | A |
6213289 | Hay et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6220790 | Schenk et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6257567 | Hansmann et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6296110 | van Zijderveld et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6533104 | Starlinger-Huemer et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6749816 | Hasegawa et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6875697 | Trivedi | Apr 2005 | B2 |
7303597 | Sprouse et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7360639 | Sprouse et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7387197 | Sprouse et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7402188 | Sprouse | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7615198 | Sprouse et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7717046 | Sprouse et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
8006827 | Aldred et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8011861 | Sprouse et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
RE42844 | Sprouse et al. | Oct 2011 | E |
8308829 | Sprouse et al. | Nov 2012 | B1 |
20060242907 | Sprouse et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060243583 | Sprouse et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20110247916 | Fitzsimmons | Oct 2011 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1900941 | Mar 2008 | EP |
2002025 | Feb 1979 | GB |
3195811 | Aug 1991 | JP |
6287567 | Oct 1994 | JP |
2012030682 | Mar 2012 | WO |
Entry |
---|
European Search Report dated Aug. 9, 2011. EP App. No./Patent No. 11250450.1215. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2013/045077 completed on Sep. 24, 2013. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20120321444 A1 | Dec 2012 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12758846 | Apr 2010 | US |
Child | 13563401 | US |