This invention relates generally to precision pumping apparatus and, more particularly to a pump controller for accurately controlling the amount of fluid dispensed from the precision pumping apparatus.
There are many applications where precise control over the amount and/or rate at which a fluid is dispensed by a pumping apparatus is necessary. In semiconductor processing, for example, it is important to control very precisely the amount and the rate at which photochemicals, such as photoresist, are applied to a semiconductor wafer being processed to manufacture semiconductor devices. The coatings applied to semiconductor wafers during processing typically require a flatness across the surface of the wafer that is measured in angstroms. Many semiconductor processes today have requirements on the order of 30 angstroms or less. The rate at which processing chemicals such as photoresists are applied to the wafer and spun out through centrifugal force to the edges of the wafer has to be controlled in order to ensure that the processing liquid is applied uniformnly. It is also critical to control the rate and volume at which photoresist chemicals are applied to the wafer in order to reduce unnecessary waste and consumption. Many of the photochemicals used in the semiconductor industry today are not only toxic, but they are very expensive, frequently costing as much as $1,000 per liter. Thus, because of the cost of the chemicals as well as the difficulties in handling toxic materials, it is necessary to ensure that enough of the photoresist is applied to the wafer to satisfy processing requirements while minimizing excessive consumption and waste.
Another important requirement for semiconductor processing is the ability to repeatedly dispense a precisely controlled amount of processing chemical each time since variations in the amount of chemicals can adversely impact consistency from wafer to wafer. In the past, because of the unrepeatability as well as the inability to precisely control the amount of chemical being dispensed, many pumps had to dispense 50% to 100% more liquid than needed in order to ensure a sufficient quantity for processing requirements. This has resulted in waste and increased processing costs.
Conventional pumping apparatus are able to accurately dispense precise amounts of typical fluids. However, these conventional pumping apparatus cannot accurately dispense low viscosity, low dispense rate fluids and the conventional pumping apparatus will either cause a double dispense or a stuttered dispense of the low viscosity fluid. In particular, at the beginning of the dispensing cycle prior to the controlled dispensing of any fluid, a small amount of the low viscosity fluid, e.g., several microliters, may be undesirable ejected onto the wafer's surface resulting in an imprecise amount of fluid being dispensed. The problems of double dispensing and stuttered dispensing of these low viscosity, low flow rate fluids are caused by a variety of factors which are present in a conventional pumping apparatus. For example, pressure may be built up in the dispensing chamber of the pumping apparatus due to the closing of a barrier valve prior to dispensing which may force some fluid into the dispensing chamber and increases the pressure in the dispensing chamber. The extra fluid and hence the extra pressure in the dispensing chamber may cause the small amount of fluid to be ejected onto the wafer's surface at the start of the dispensing cycle. In addition, the timing of the control valves operation and the dispense system dynamics, such as tubing length, tubing diameter and nozzle size, in a conventional pumping apparatus may also contribute to the problem of the double or stuttered dispense of low viscosity, low dispense rate fluids.
It is desirable to provide low volume, low rate chemical dispensing pumping apparatus capable of precise and repeatable control of the rate and volume of low viscosity chemicals dispensed by the pumping apparatus, and it is to these ends that the present invention is directed.
In accordance with the invention, a low dispense rate precision dispensing pumping apparatus and method is provided which enable precise and repeatable control of dispense rate and volume of low viscosity fluids, and which overcomes the foregoing and other disadvantages of conventional dispensing pumping apparatus and method. The pumping apparatus precisely controls the dispensing amount and/or rate of low viscosity fluids by precisely controlling the operation of several different portions of the pumping apparatus during the dispense cycle. In particular, a pump controller may precisely control the timing of the control valves with respect to each other, the motion of the dispensing motor, and the timing of the control valves with respect to the movement of the dispensing motor. The pump controller in accordance with the invention accurately controls a pumping apparatus to avoid the double dispense or stuttered dispense problems associated with conventional pumping apparatus.
The invention is particularly applicable to a pumping apparatus which accurately dispenses precise amounts of low viscosity fluids and it is in this context that the invention will be described. It will be appreciated, however, that the apparatus and method in accordance with the invention has greater utility, such as to accurately dispensing precise amounts of other fluids which may not be low viscosity fluids.
The software application 20 may control, for example, the opening and closing of the various control valves in the pump and the movement of the motors or actuators which drive the pump in order to accurately dispense a precise amount of fluid onto the wafer 18. The method implemented by the software application for controlling the pump 12 to dispense low viscosity, low flow rate fluids in accordance with the invention will be described below with reference to
To fill itself with fluid, the pump 12 may draw fluid from the reservoir 14 into a feed chamber as described below. The fluid may then be filtered through a filter and fed into a separate dispensing chamber as described below. From the dispensing chamber, the fluid may be dispensed through a filter 22 onto the wafer 18 in precise amounts even for low viscosity, low rate fluids. The actual cycles of the pump 12 will be described below with reference to
Once the feed chamber 34 is filled with fluid, the inlet valve 36 is shut and the isolation valve 44 and a barrier valve 50 are opened to permit the fluid to flow through a filter 46 into the dispensing stage 32. Once the fluid is in the dispensing stage 32 and to isolate the feed and filtration stage from the dispensing stage, the isolation valve 44 and the barrier valve 50 may be closed. To vent unwanted air from the system or relieve excess pressure, the filter 46 may include a vent valve 48. As the fluid is pushed through the filter 46, unwanted impurities and the like are removed from the fluid. The fluid then flows through a barrier valve 50 into a dispensing chamber 52 in the second or dispensing stage of the pump, and the pump begins a dispense cycle as will now be described.
In the dispensing cycle, once the dispensing chamber is full of fluid and the barrier valve 50 is closed, a purge valve 54 is opened and the fluid in the dispensing chamber 52 is pushed by a dispense diaphragm 56 to eliminate any bubbles in the fluid in the dispensing chamber 52. To push or pull the dispense diaphragm 56, the dispensing diaphragm may be between the dispensing chamber and a hydraulic fluid chamber 58 filled with hydraulic fluid. The hydraulic fluid may be pressurized or de-pressurized by a dispensing pump 60 which may include a piston 62, a lead screw 64 and a stepper motor 66. To apply pressure to the fluid in the dispensing chamber 52, the stepper motor is engaged which engages the lead screw and pressurizes the hydraulic fluid. The hydraulic fluid in turn pushes the dispensing diaphragm into the dispensing chamber 52 which pressurizes the fluid in the dispensing chamber 52 or pushes the fluid out of the dispensing chamber 52 if the purge valve 54 or an outlet valve 68 are opened. If the outlet valve 68 is open, then an accurate amount of the fluid is dispensed onto the wafer. Now, the typical process for dispensing fluid will be described.
At the end of the dispensing stage and at the beginning of the suckback stage, the motor is stopped and reversed or an external stop/suckback valve (not shown) may be-opened to suck any fluid remaining in the nozzle back into the dispensing chamber to ensure that no drips occur at the end of the fluid dispensing. After the fluid has been sucked back into the dispensing chamber, the outlet valve is closed and the motor is stopped. Next, during the fill stage, the inlet valve is opened and a vacuum is applied to the feed diaphragm to draw fluid into the feed chamber from the reservoir. At the beginning of the filter stage, the inlet valve is closed, the isolate valve is opened, the feed motor applies positive pressure to the fluid in the feed chamber, the barrier valve is opened and the dispense motor is reversed to push fluid through the filter into the dispense chamber. Once the fluid has exited the feed chamber, the isolate valve may be closed.
At the beginning of the vent stage, the isolate valve is opened, the barrier valve is closed, the vent valve is opened, the dispense motor is stopped and pressure is applied to the feed diaphram to remove air bubbles from the filter. At the beginning of the purge stage, the isolate valve is closed, the feed pump does not apply pressure or a vacuum to the feed chamber, the vent valve is closed, the purge valve is opened and the dispense pump is moved forward to remove air bubbles from the dispensing chamber. At the beginning of the static purge stage, the dispense motor is stopped but the purge valve remains open to continue the removal of air from the dispensing chamber. At the beginning of the ready stage, the isolate and barrier valves are opened and the purge is closed so that the feed pump and the system reaches ambient pressure and the pump is ready to dispense fluid.
As described above, this conventional dispensing process suffers from double dispense or stuttered dispense problems. In particular, the closure of the barrier valve prior to dispensing pushes fluid out of the valve as it closes which pressurizes the fluid in the dispensing chamber. This may cause a small amount of unwanted fluid to dispense onto the wafer since the outlet valve is open. In addition, since the motor is started at the same time as the outlet valve is opened, an uneven dispensing of fluid (or stuttered dispensing) may occur since the outlet valve takes more time to open than the starting of the motor and therefore the motor may be initially pushing the fluid through an outlet valve which is not quite completely open. A dispensing method in accordance with the invention which solves these problems will now be described.
In particular, in accordance with invention, the barrier valve is not closed at the beginning of the dispense stage as it done in the conventional process. Rather, the barrier valve is closed at the beginning of the vent stage and kept closed during the dispense stage. This avoids the sudden rise in pressure in the dispense chamber and, therefore, fluid does not leak out of the outlet valve due to the sudden rise in pressure. Since the barrier valve does not open and close prior to the beginning of the dispense stage, but does close at the beginning of the vent stage, the pressure in the dispense chamber does increase after the vent and purge states and this additional pressure must be released. To release this pressure, during the static purge stage 84, the dispense motor may be reversed to back out the piston 62 some predetermined distance to compensate for any pressure increase caused by the closure of the barrier valve. As an example, each step of the stepper motor may reduce the pressure by about 0.1 psi. If the closure of the barrier valve increases the pressure by 2 psi, then the motor may be reversed 20 steps to reduce the pressure in the dispense chamber by this amount to compensate for the closure of the barrier valve. The actual pressure decrease, however, depends on the characteristics of the particular stepper motor, lead screw and piston being used. The pressure decrease caused by each step of the motor may be determined by a pressure sensor which is located inside the dispensing chamber. In accordance with the invention, since the outlet valve is not open when the additional pressure is added into the dispensing chamber during the vent stage, no “spitting” of the fluid onto the wafer may occur.
The motor may be further reversed a predetermined additional distance so that the motor may be moved forward just prior to dispensing to adjust the dispense pressure to zero and avoid any backlash which normally occurs when the motor is moved backwards before the dispensing of fluid. In particular, with a piston, lead screw and stepper motor dispense pump, the last motion prior to a dispense operation is normally forward to avoid the fact that, as the piston changes direction, there is some backlash. Thus, the problem of the additional pressure caused by the closure of the barrier valve is avoided.
Next, during the beginning of the dispense stage 72, the timing of the outlet valve and the start of the motor are changed to avoid the stuttering dispense problem. In particular, the valve is a mechanical device that requires a finite period of time to open. The motor, on the other hand, may start more quickly than the outlet valve may open. Therefore, starting the motor and opening the outlet valve simultaneously will cause a rise in pressure of the dispense fluid which in turn causes the stuttered dispensing. To avoid this problem, the outlet valve is opened and then, some predetermined period of time, T, later, the dispense motor is started so that the outlet valve is completely open when the motor is started which achieves a good dispense. The predetermined period of time depends on the characteristics of the outlet valve and dispense motor being used, but, if the outlet valve takes approximately 50 ms to open, then the predetermined period of time may be, for example, between 50 and 75 mS and preferably approximately 75 mS. This predetermined period of time may also be referred to as a delay. Thus, in accordance with the invention, the dispense motor is no longer pushing fluid through a partially open outlet valve so that an accurate, controlled amount of fluid may be dispensed onto the wafer. Thus, in accordance with the invention, the problems caused by the closure of the barrier valve and the simultaneously opening of the outlet valve and starting of the dispense motor are avoided to provide more accurate dispensing of fluids, such as low viscosity fluids.
As described above, the valves and motors in the pumping apparatus are controlled by a software application so that the above changes in the dispensing process may be applied to any two-stage pumping apparatus since no hardware changes are needed. Thus, for example, if the tubing, tubing length, nozzle height or nozzle diameter is changed, the process in accordance with the invention may be easily adapted. Now, the method for controlling the dispense process in accordance with the invention will be described.
While the foregoing has been with reference to a particular embodiment of the invention, it will be appreciated by those skilled in the art that changes in this embodiment may be made without departing from the principles and spirit of the invention.
This application is a divisional of, and claims a benefit of priority under 35 U.S.C. 120 of the filing date of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/447,504 by inventors Raymond A. Zagars, et al. entitled “Pump Controller for Precision Pumping Apparatus” filed on Nov. 23, 1999, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,029,238 which in turn claims the benefit of priority under 35 U.S.C. § 119 to provisional patent application Ser. No. 60/109,568 filed Nov. 23, 1998, each of which are hereby expressly incorporated by reference for all purposes.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
269626 | Bodel et al. | Dec 1882 | A |
826018 | Concoff | Jul 1906 | A |
1664125 | Lowrey | Mar 1928 | A |
2153664 | Freedlander | Apr 1939 | A |
2215505 | Hollander | Sep 1940 | A |
2328468 | Laffly | Aug 1943 | A |
2457384 | Krenz | Dec 1948 | A |
2631538 | Johnson | Mar 1953 | A |
2673522 | Dickey | Mar 1954 | A |
2757966 | Samiran | Aug 1956 | A |
3072058 | Christopher et al. | Jan 1963 | A |
3227279 | Bockelman | Jan 1966 | A |
3327635 | Sachnik | Jun 1967 | A |
3623661 | Wagner | Nov 1971 | A |
3741298 | Canton | Jun 1973 | A |
3895748 | Klingenberg | Jul 1975 | A |
3954352 | Sakai | May 1976 | A |
4023592 | Patzke et al. | May 1977 | A |
4093403 | Schrimpf | Jun 1978 | A |
4452265 | Lonnebring | Jun 1984 | A |
4483665 | Hauser | Nov 1984 | A |
4541455 | Hauser | Sep 1985 | A |
4597719 | Tano | Jul 1986 | A |
4597721 | Santefort | Jul 1986 | A |
4601409 | DiRegolo | Jul 1986 | A |
4614438 | Kobayashi | Sep 1986 | A |
4671545 | Miyazaki | Jun 1987 | A |
4690621 | Swain | Sep 1987 | A |
4705461 | Clements | Nov 1987 | A |
4821997 | Zdeblick | Apr 1989 | A |
4824073 | Zdeblick | Apr 1989 | A |
4865525 | Kern | Sep 1989 | A |
4915126 | Gyllinder | Apr 1990 | A |
4943032 | Zdeblick | Jul 1990 | A |
4950134 | Bailey et al. | Aug 1990 | A |
4952386 | Davison | Aug 1990 | A |
4966646 | Zdeblick | Oct 1990 | A |
5061156 | Kuehne et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5061574 | Henager, Jr. et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5062770 | Story | Nov 1991 | A |
5134962 | Amada et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
5135031 | Burgess | Aug 1992 | A |
5167837 | Snodgrass et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5192198 | Gebauer et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5261442 | Kingsford et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5262068 | Bowers et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5316181 | Burch | May 1994 | A |
5344195 | Parimore, Jr. et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5350200 | Peterson et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5380019 | Hillery et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5434774 | Seberger | Jul 1995 | A |
5476004 | Kingsford | Dec 1995 | A |
5490765 | Bailey et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5511797 | Nikirk et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5516429 | Snodgrass et al. | May 1996 | A |
5527161 | Bailey et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5546009 | Raphael | Aug 1996 | A |
5575311 | Kingsford | Nov 1996 | A |
5580103 | Hall | Dec 1996 | A |
5599100 | Jackson et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5599394 | Tabe et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5645301 | Kingsford et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5652391 | Kingsford et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5653251 | Handler | Aug 1997 | A |
5743293 | Kelly | Apr 1998 | A |
5762795 | Bailey et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5772899 | Snodgrass et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5785508 | Bolt | Jul 1998 | A |
5793754 | Houldsworth et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5839828 | Glanville | Nov 1998 | A |
5848605 | Bailey et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5947702 | Biederstadt | Sep 1999 | A |
5971723 | Bolt et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5991279 | Haugli et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6105829 | Snodgrass et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6190565 | Bailey et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6238576 | Yajima | May 2001 | B1 |
6250502 | Cote et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6251293 | Snodgrass et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6302660 | Kurita et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6318971 | Ota | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6325932 | Gibson | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6330517 | Dobrowskii | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6348124 | Garbett | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6478547 | Savard et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6506030 | Kottke | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6540265 | Turk | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6554579 | Martin et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6592825 | Pelc | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6635183 | Gibson | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6742992 | Davis | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6742993 | Savard et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6767877 | Kuo | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6837484 | Kingsford et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6901791 | Frenz et al. | Jun 2005 | B1 |
6925072 | Grohn | Aug 2005 | B1 |
6952618 | Davlin et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
7013223 | Zhang et al. | Mar 2006 | B1 |
7029238 | Zagars et al. | Apr 2006 | B1 |
7063785 | Hiraku et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7083202 | Eberle et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7247245 | Proulx et al. | Jul 2007 | B1 |
7383967 | Gibson | Jun 2008 | B2 |
20020044536 | Izumi et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020095240 | Sickinger | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20030148759 | Leliveid | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030222798 | Floros | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040050771 | Gibson | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040072450 | Collins | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040133728 | Ellerbrock et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20050061722 | Takao et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050126985 | Campbell | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050184087 | Zagars | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050232296 | Schultze et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050238497 | Holst | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20060070960 | Gibson | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060083259 | Metcalf et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20080089361 | Metcalf et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
7887287 | Apr 1988 | AU |
1271140 | Jul 1990 | CA |
299 09 100 | Aug 1999 | DE |
0 249 655 | Dec 1987 | EP |
0 410 394 | Jan 1991 | EP |
0261972 | Dec 1992 | EP |
0892204 | Jan 1998 | EP |
0863538 | Sep 1998 | EP |
0867649 | Sep 1998 | EP |
1133639 | Jun 2004 | EP |
661 522 | Nov 1951 | GB |
11 026430 | Jan 1999 | JP |
9635876 | Nov 1996 | WO |
WO 0031416 | Jun 2000 | WO |
WO 0140646 | Jun 2001 | WO |
WO 02090771 | Nov 2002 | WO |
WO 2006057957 | Jun 2006 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20050184087 A1 | Aug 2005 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60109568 | Nov 1998 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 09447504 | Nov 1999 | US |
Child | 11051576 | US |