This disclosure pertains to, inter alia, various types of pumps that are magnetically driven. More specifically it pertains to such pumps in which a rotary or rotary-reciprocating element, such as a pump gear, is connected to a driven magnet housed in a magnet housing (“magnet cup”) in which the magnet is wetted by the fluid being pumped by the pump.
Conventional hydraulic systems often include one or more pumps for urging fluid flow. Many such systems also include sensors or indicators of any of various parameters such as pressure, temperature, conductivity, etc., of the fluid flowing in the system. Conventional indicators include Bourdon gauges, ball-flowmeters, analog thermometers, and the like that directly indicate the respective parameter. A “sensor” usually includes a transducer or the like that converts the parameter being sensed (e.g., pressure or temperature) into a corresponding signal (e.g., an electronic or optical signal). The sensor usually also includes an electronic circuit that receives data directly from the transducer and processes the data for use by other electronics as required for, e.g., providing a measure of the parameter or for use in control circuits. The measurement can be used, for example, for a display of the parameter (e.g., LED display). An example control circuit includes a controller connected and configured to perform feedback control or other control of a motor or other actuator powering a pump.
In hydraulic systems including a pump, the pump is typically a discrete stand-alone component, by which is meant that the pump is manufactured and sold separately, from other components, to original equipment manufacturers (OEMs) for incorporation into the OEM's own system, along with other components, fluid conduits, and the like. Similarly, sensors and indicators are also usually discrete components, configured and sold for use by OEMs in any of various applications. This arrangement works fine for most hydraulic circuits, particularly those in which space is not a constraining factor. However, connecting a conventional discrete component into a hydraulic circuit typically requires some kind of static seal. For permanent applications, the components can be welded into place. While usually providing an effective static seal, a component welded into place is extremely difficult or impossible to remove. For many if not most applications, static seal(s) are configured to allow a component to be removed from the system from time to time. An exemplary static seal for this purpose is an elastomeric O-ring, ring seal, gasket, or the like. Unfortunately, these and analogous types of static seals exhibit an increased probability of leaks. Leakage risk can be a serious problem in submersible systems, systems handling hazardous fluids, and systems that must operate under severe conditions or that must operate trouble-free for extremely long periods of time.
Certain applications of hydraulic circuits have demanded that components thereof, such as pumps, indicators, sensors, conduits, and the like, be miniaturized as much as possible. Other applications have demanded that components be ruggedized to a high degree. Sometimes both miniaturization and ruggedness must be achieved simultaneously. Unfortunately, increased miniaturization often works against achieving simultaneously better ruggedization. This is not only true for hydraulic systems in general but also for pumps and other components used in such systems.
Striving to reduce size of and/or to ruggedize a hydraulic system can substantially increase the difficulty of using certain discrete components such as pumps and sensors. One challenge involves the difficulty of establishing and maintaining adequate seals, such as static seals isolating the interior of a pump housing from the exterior environment or sealing around a sensor extending from outside into the hydraulic flow path. Another challenge arises from placing and connecting the components much closer together in the system. For example, placing a conventional stand-alone pressure sensor at the inlet or outlet of a miniaturized pump can result in a contorted arrangement that occupies too much space and in which the component is essentially shoe-horned into its location. These arrangements can excessively stress the components and/or their respective housings, compromise seals, and reduce the overall reliability and/or operational life of the components. In fact, requirements of small size and critical sealing can actually preclude the use of conventional fluidic sensors in a hydraulic system.
Pump systems described herein were developed in the course of researching possible improvements in gear pumps used for specific applications requiring miniaturization and improved ruggedness. Specifically, including one or more sensors as part of the physical pressure barrier (“housing”) of the pump provides much smaller pump-sensor combinations while mitigating the effects of any additional potential leaks by eliminating additional hydraulic connections.
For magnetically actuating a rotary pumping member (such as a combination of a driving gear and a driven gear in a gear pump), the rotary pumping member is coupled to a driven magnet configured to rotate on a longitudinal axis when driven by a magnet driver. The driven magnet is sealingly housed in a magnet housing (“magnet cup”) that allows the magnet to be bathed by the pumped fluid and isolated from the external environment as the magnet is being driven. This maintains the location of driven parts of the pump within the fluid path and avoids having to use a leak-prone dynamic seal. The ability to isolate the rotor environment from the stator environment is a primary advantage of magnetically-driven pumps.
Adding sensors to a magnetically-driven pump generally poses a challenge regarding how to deal with electrical connections between the sensor and the electronics that either control operation of the pump (for a feedback control-type sensor), or that store and/or communicate data (for a fluid monitoring-type sensor). Some fluidic sensors that use wired electrical connections are designed so that the wires must pass through a hole (“through-hole”) in the fluid containment wall, thus requiring a seal to prevent fluid from contacting and possibly damaging the electronics. Addition of through-holes and seals tends to make a pump less robust because each wire that enters a motor housing adds a potential leak point where moisture or environmental contaminants can gain access to the motor electronics. The incorporation of one or more sensor transducers in the magnet cup eliminates the need to use discrete component(s) to provide the sensor function(s), thereby eliminating static seal(s) that otherwise would be required. Certain embodiments of magnet cups disclosed herein enable one or more sensors to be in indirect contact with the pumped fluid while avoiding the static seals normally required with sensors that are mounted to a fluid conduit or chamber and extend into the fluid pathway.
In addition, the volume of space that otherwise would be occupied by housing(s) of the stand-alone component(s) is reduced, resulting in a substantially more compact assembly. By incorporating sensor electronics on a printed circuit board mounted to the outside of the distal-end wall of the magnet cup, for example (with the sensor transducer being mounted to the circuit board and sensing its respective parameter through the wall of the magnet cup), the assemblies are made more compact and more reliable. In this way, the sensor electronics can be coupled directly, with minimal or no external wiring, to motor-control electronics located, for example, on a printed circuit board situated inside a housing containing a magnet-driving stator. By incorporating the sensor(s) in the wall of the magnet cup, because fewer wires are located outside the motor housing, the entire pump assembly is more rugged than conventional pump systems. This is particularly advantageous in hazardous environments or submerged applications.
Although the exemplary embodiments shown herein are gear pumps, pumping systems consistent with the disclosed sensing devices are not limited to gear pumps. Rather, they include any of various types of pumps having at least one movable pump element contained in a housing and coupled to a permanent magnet that is driven by magnetic forces that originate outside the housing and are directed at the magnet through walls of the housing. The magnet is normally contained in a portion of the housing called a magnet housing or magnet cup. In pumps in which the movable element is a rotary element, the magnet and magnet cup are configured so that the magnet, when placed in a rotating magnetic field, rotates in the magnet cup about a longitudinal magnet axis. To such end the driven magnet usually has a substantially cylindrical shape and the magnet cup has a substantially hollow cylindrical (can-like) configuration that contains the driven magnet. The driven magnet can be driven by a driving magnet coupled to the armature of a motor, or by a driving stator located outside the magnet cup. Lines of magnetic force produced by the driving magnet or by the stator pass through the wall of the magnet cup and inductively couple to the driven magnet. During running of the pump, these lines of magnetic force are directed so as to urge rotation of the driven magnet about its axis, which causes rotation of the rotary pump element. In a gear pump, the rotary pump element is termed a “driving gear” that is interdigitated with a corresponding driven gear. As the driving gear rotates, it causes corresponding contra-rotation of the driven gear. The combined gear rotations produce a pumping force. The gear pump can be, for example, what is conventionally known as a “cavity style” or can include, for example, a “suction shoe,” or can be a hybrid of these.
Another type of pump involving a movable pump element coupled to a driven magnet is a piston pump. In some configurations of piston pumps, the piston undergoes both rotary and linearly reciprocating motion as driven magnetically. Other exemplary types of pumps include centrifugal pumps, lobe pumps, or pumps that have a pressure-compliant member inside the housing.
As noted above, the pump housing constitutes the physical pressure barrier of the pump, i.e., the physical barrier separating the inside of the pump from its external environment (and vice versa). Escape of fluid from inside the pump housing across the physical barrier constitutes a leak. The pumps and hydraulic systems described herein exhibit fewer leaks under more aggressive pumping conditions, while providing improved pump performance over longer periods of time, compared to conventional pumps and systems.
Since the magnet cup constitutes a portion of the pump housing, in many embodiments of the invention at least one sensor is integrated into a wall of the magnetic cup so as not to be wetted by the pumped fluid. Such an “integral sensor” is associated with the magnetic cup in such a way that it functions essentially as a part of the cup instead of as a separate, discrete component. The integrated sensor is any of various sensors that can quantitatively react to their respective parameters as sensed across a wall or portion of a wall of the magnet cup, or a cross a wall or other fluid barrier coupled to a wall of the magnet cup. The sensor(s) can be one or more of pressure sensors, temperature sensors, or other sensors such as, for example, conductivity sensors, resistivity sensors, turbidity sensors, flow-rate (viscosity) sensors, pH sensors, dissolved gas sensors, or sensors of other fluidic variables such as turbidity, dissolved ions, and optical absorption, or sensors that detect rotation of elements of the pump motor. A conductivity sensor can be used, for example, to shut a pump down in the event of a “running dry” condition. A rotation sensor can be used, for example, if a motor controller is sensorless, to sense rotation direction or whether rotation of a pumping element is occurring at all. An example rotation sensor is based on the Hall effect. A dissolved gas sensor can be used to control a degassing system. Exemplary sensor types include strain gauge sensors, capacitive sensors, resistive sensors, piezoelectric sensors, and electrodes such as ion-specific electrodes. The sensors can be connected to other electronics by conventional conductors (wires, pins, and the like) or, if permitted by the type and general configuration of the sensor, by wireless connections. Other Hall-effect sensors detect mechanical motion of one or more internal magnetic elements. Inductive sensors include, for example, a voice coil for measuring acoustic signals and/or fine-positioned displacements. Another exemplary inductive sensor receives and/or transmits RF signals.
Although embodiments shown herein describe sensors as being mounted to a distal-end wall of the magnet cup, the location of sensors is not limited to a particular wall of the magnet cup, or even to a magnet cup at all. For example, sensor(s) can be located at either the pump-inlet region of the magnet cup (for sensing, e.g., inlet pressure) or the pump-outlet region of the magnet cup (for sensing, e.g., outlet pressure). Exemplary mounting arrangements of the sensor to a wall of the magnet cup or other region of the pump housing, thus producing an integral sensor, include direct welded, separate membrane welded, over-molded, adhesive-mounted, statically sealed in place, clamped, mechanically joined, and integrated directly into the wall by molding or casting. Many types of sensors do not actually contact the fluid in the pump. For example, a strain-gauge based pressure sensor is capable of sensing pressure through the wall of a thin-walled magnet cup or through a localized thinner region of a magnet cup. Such a sensor transducer can be coupled directly to an “unpierced” wall of the magnet cup. A desirable method for mounting a capacitive sensor is resistance welding to a wall (e.g., the distal end wall) of a non-magnetic metal or injection-molded polymeric magnet cup.
The foregoing and additional objects, features, and advantages of the invention will become more apparent from the following detailed description, which proceeds with reference to the accompanying figures.
Mounted to the distal-end wall 26b is a sensor transducer 28, comprising a parameter-sensitive surface (i.e., a surface that responds in a measurable way to the parameter to which the sensor is sensitive). In this embodiment, the sensor transducer 28 is sealingly mounted with its parameter-sensitive surface facing the driven magnet 24. The phrase “sealingly mounted” means that the sensor transducer 28 is held in a position so as to maintain contact with at least a portion of the mounting surface at one or more contact points at which a barrier prevents fluid from passing through or across the surface. The barrier may take the form of, for example, the surface itself, an o-ring, an absorbent material, an adhesive material, or the like. As a purchased component, the sensor transducer 28 may be a type capable of being operated while in contact with (wetted by) fluid. But, in the various embodiments discussed herein, the sensor transducer desirably also is capable of being operated (or is configured specifically for operation) in a dry condition, i.e., without being wetted by the pumped fluid. At least the parameter-sensitive surface can be incorporated into a wall of the magnet cup. The sensor transducer 28 in this embodiment is electrically connected directly to a printed circuit board 34 situated outside the magnet cup 28. The printed circuit board 30 contains an electronic circuit that, for example, receives transducer signals from the sensor transducer 28 and conditions the transducer signals for use by other electronics (not shown), such as driver electronics for the stator 32. For example, the transducer signals can be used for feedback control of the driver electronics for the stator 32.
The magnet cup 116 can be made of any of various rigid materials that are not magnetic. For example, the magnet cup 116 can be made of a non-magnetic metal or metal alloy, in which event the magnet cup can be formed by machining, deep-drawing, casting, or the like. As another example, the magnet cup can be made of a polymeric or copolymeric material formed by machining or molding, for example. The polymeric or copolymeric material can be reinforced using fibers, particles, or other suitable non-magnetic material. A polymeric magnet cup may be transparent or translucent to selected wavelengths of electromagnetic radiation so as to enable a non-wetted sensor to detect, across the wall of the magnet cup, optical properties or variation in such properties of the fluid being pumped.
An exemplary embodiment of a magnet cup 150 made of metal is shown in
In the embodiment of
An exemplary embodiment of a magnet cup 200 made of a molded rigid polymer material is shown in
Details of the magnet cup 200 are shown in
To provide feedback control to the pump 318 based on measurements obtained by the sensing component 320, a measured feedback signal 322 from the sensing component 320 is converted by the ADC 312 into a first digital feedback signal 324 that can be processed by the software portion 302. Additional data may be combined with the first digital feedback signal 324 from an external source by a second digital feedback signal 326. A first multiplexer 328 combines the digital feedback signals 324, 326 for processing by the controllers 306, 308. A proportional control signal 330 and an integral control signal 332 may then be combined by a second multiplexer 334 to form a composite control signal 336. The composite control signal 336 may then be transmitted to the DAC 310 for conversion into an analog control signal 338. The analog control signal 338 may then be processed by the BLDC controller 314, and subsequently delivered at an appropriate time to the motor 316 for controlling the performance of the pump 318.
In view of the many possible embodiments to which the principles of the disclosed invention may be applied, it should be recognized that the illustrated embodiments are only preferred examples of the invention and should not be taken as limiting the scope of the invention. Rather, the scope of the invention is defined by the following claims. We therefore claim as our invention all that comes within the scope and spirit of these claims.
This patent application claims priority to and the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/396,715, filed on Jun. 1, 2010, which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61396715 | Jun 2010 | US |