This invention relates generally to pump sets and pumps to deliver fluids to patients by way of a flow control apparatus, and more particularly to a method for using a pump set having a safety interlock device to control operation of a pump.
Administering fluids containing medicine or nutrition to a patient is well known in the art. Fluids can be delivered to patients by gravity flow, but often are delivered to the patient by a pump set loaded on a flow control apparatus, such as a peristaltic pump, which delivers fluid to the patient at a controlled rate of delivery. A peristaltic pump usually comprises a housing that includes a rotor or the like operatively engaged to at least one motor through a gearbox. The rotor drives fluid through the tubing of the pump set by the peristaltic action effected by rotation of the rotor by the motor. The motor is operatively connected to a rotatable shaft that drives the rotor, which in turn progressively compresses the tubing and drives the fluid at a controlled rate through the pump set. A controller operates the motor to drive the rotor. Other types of peristaltic pumps not employing rotors are also known.
In order for the pump to deliver an accurate amount of fluid corresponding with the flow parameters programmed into the pump, the administration feeding set must be correctly loaded on the pump. If the pump set is misaligned in the pump, the pump may deliver an inaccurate amount of fluid to a patient or the pump generates a low flow alarm requiring the condition to be examined and the set reloaded. Existing pumps have systems to detect whether the pump set is properly loaded. An example of such a pump having a detection system is shown in co-assigned U.S. Pat. No. 4,913,703, entitled SAFETY INTERLOCK SYSTEM FOR MEDICAL FLUID PUMPS, the disclosure of which is incorporated by reference. This system uses a magnet on the pump set which is detected by circuitry in the pump. It would be desirable to provide a pump set that can be detected but which does not require each pump set to have a magnet.
In one aspect, an enteral feeding set for an enteral feeding pump having a control system for controlling operation of the pump to supply nutrient liquid to a patient through the enteral feeding set loaded in the pump, a source of electromagnetic radiation operatively connected to the control system of the pump for emitting electromagnetic radiation, and an electromagnetic radiation detector operatively connected to the control system for receiving the electromagnetic radiation and providing an indication to the control system that the feeding set is properly loaded in the feeding pump generally comprises a conduit for carrying nutrient liquid to a patient. A safety interlock includes a light pipe for providing a passage of the electromagnetic radiation from the source of electromagnetic radiation to the electromagnetic radiation detector only when the safety interlock is loaded in the pump such that nutrient liquid flow to the patient is regulated by the pump.
In another aspect, an enteral feeding set for an enteral feeding pump having a control system for controlling operation of the pump to supply nutrient liquid to a patient through the enteral feeding set loaded in the pump, a source of electromagnetic radiation operatively connected to the control system of the pump for emitting electromagnetic radiation, and an electromagnetic radiation detector operatively connected to the control system for receiving the electromagnetic radiation and providing an indication to the control system that the feeding set is properly loaded in the feeding pump generally comprises a conduit for carrying nutrient liquid to a patient. A light pipe is positioned with respect to the conduit for providing a passage of the electromagnetic radiation from the source of electromagnetic radiation to the electromagnetic radiation detector only when the light pipe is loaded in the pump such that nutrient liquid flow to the patient is regulated by the pump.
In yet another aspect, a safety interlock adapted for use in a medical device having a control system for controlling operation of the medical device, a source of electromagnetic radiation disposed to emit electromagnetic radiation, and an electromagnetic radiation detector operatively connected to the control system generally comprises a light pipe adapted for providing a passage of the electromagnetic radiation from the source of electromagnetic radiation to the electromagnetic radiation detector only when the light pipe is loaded in the medical device such that nutrient liquid flow to the patient is regulated by the medical device.
In one aspect of the present invention, a method of using a feeding set on an enteral feeding pump generally comprises inserting an interlock device of the feeding set into a recess of the enteral feeding pump. Infrared radiation is intermittently emitted in a direction for striking the inserted interlock device and is transmitted and internally reflected within the interlock device to redirect the infrared radiation toward a first detector when the interlock device is properly inserted in the pump recess. The first detector detects the infrared radiation redirected within the interlock device. A visible light emitter is intermittently energized only after infrared radiation has been detected by the first detector. Visible light is filtered with the interlock device to prevent transmission through the interlock device, and a second detector is read to verify that visible light emitted by the visible light emitter has been blocked. Operation of the enteral feeding pump is enabled to pump nutrient liquid in the feeding set in response to detection of infrared radiation by the first detector and the verification that no visible light is detected by the second detector.
In another aspect of the present invention, a method of using a feeding set on an enteral feeding pump. The feeding set has an interlock device adapted to be inserted into a recess of the enteral feeding pump. The method generally comprises inserting the interlock device into the recess of the enteral feeding pump. Electromagnetic radiation is emitted in a direction for striking the inserted interlock device and at least a portion of the electromagnetic radiation striking the interlock device is detected when the interlock device is properly inserted in the pump recess. Operation of the enteral feeding pump to pump nutrient liquid in the feeding set is enabled in response to the detected electromagnetic radiation.
In yet another aspect of the present invention, a method for controlling a pumping apparatus capable of mounting a pump set having a safety interlock device thereon generally comprises emitting electromagnetic radiation from a first source of electromagnetic radiation in a direction for striking the safety interlock device of the pump set. A first electromagnetic radiation detector is activated to detect electromagnetic radiation striking the first detector. Electromagnetic radiation is emitted from a second source of electromagnetic radiation in a direction for striking the safety interlock device of the pump set. A second electromagnetic radiation detector is activated to detect electromagnetic radiation striking the second detector. The pumping apparatus is controlled to operate for pumping fluid in the pump set only when electromagnetic radiation emitted from the first source is detected by the first detector and when the second detector does not detect electromagnetic radiation.
In one aspect of the present invention, a controller for operating a pumping apparatus to supply fluid to a patient through a pump set having a safety interlock loaded in the pumping apparatus generally comprises a first source of electromagnetic radiation operatively connected to the pumping apparatus for emitting electromagnetic radiation. A first electromagnetic radiation detector is operatively connected to the pumping apparatus. A second source of electromagnetic radiation is operatively connected to the pumping apparatus for emitting electromagnetic radiation, and a second electromagnetic radiation detector is operatively connected to the pumping apparatus. A processor is programmed to: (i) instruct the first source of electromagnetic radiation to emit electromagnetic radiation in a direction for striking the safety interlock of the pump set; (ii) activate the first electromagnetic radiation detector to detect the electromagnetic radiation emitted from the first source of electromagnetic radiation; (iii) instruct the second source of electromagnetic radiation to emit electromagnetic radiation in a direction for striking the safety interlock of the pump set; (iv) activate the second electromagnetic radiation detector to detect the electromagnetic radiation emitted from the second source of electromagnetic radiation; and (v) control the pumping apparatus to operate for pumping fluid in the pump set only when electromagnetic radiation emitted from the first source is detected by the first detector and when the electromagnetic radiation emitted from the second source is not detect by the second detector.
Corresponding reference characters indicate corresponding parts throughout the several views of the drawings.
Referring now to the drawings, an enteral feeding pump (broadly, “a pumping apparatus”) constructed according to the principles of the present invention is generally indicated at 1. The feeding pump comprises a housing generally indicated at 3 that is constructed so as to mount an administration feeding set (broadly, a “pump set”) generally indicated at 5 (see
The enteral feeding pump 1 further includes a pumping unit (indicated generally at 23) comprising a pump motor 25 located in the housing 3 and shown schematically in
Referring now to
As shown in
Generally speaking, a safety interlock device is able to affect the propagation of electromagnetic radiation by diffusion, diffraction, reflection and/or refraction, or any combination of diffusion, diffraction, reflection and/or refraction. Diffusion is generally understood as the scattering of electromagnetic radiation rays either when reflected from a rough surface or during transmission of electromagnetic radiation through a translucent medium. Diffraction is generally understood as the bending of electromagnetic radiation rays around the edges of opaque objects. Reflection is understood as the return or change in the direction of travel of particles or radiant energy which impinges on a surface but does not enter the substance providing the reflecting surface. Refraction is understood as the change in direction of motion of a ray of radiant energy as it passes obliquely from one medium into another in which the speeds of propagation are different (e.g., media of different densities). The amount of refraction is based on the index of refraction dependent in part on the density of the material facing the medium.
The pump 1 can be programmed or otherwise controlled for operation in a desired manner. For instance, the pump 1 can begin operation to provide feeding fluids from bag 69 to the patient. The care giver may select, for example, the amount of fluid to be delivered, the rate at which the fluid is to be delivered and the frequency of fluid delivery. As shown in
In the first embodiment, the pump includes an infrared (“IR”) emitter 105 (broadly, “a source of electromagnetic radiation”) housed in the second lower recess 47. Referring to
Other sensors (not shown), such as a sensor that determines the type of pump set that has been placed in the pump 1 and a flow monitoring sensor can be in communication with the controller 77 to facilitate accurate operation of the pump. The IR emitter 105 is positioned in an alcove 113 in the second lower recess 47 of the housing 3 so that electromagnetic radiation (indicated by arrows A1 in
In the illustrated first embodiment, the IR emitter 105 is located approximately 90 degrees from the IR detector 109. When the feeding set 5 is not loaded in the second lower recess 47 and the electromagnetic radiation propagation affecting member 87 is not received on the seat 91, the infrared radiation from the IR emitter 105 is not detected by the IR detector 109. Also when the safety interlock device 61 is not received on the seat 91, visible light from outside of the pump 1 (i.e., ambient light) may enter the second lower recess 47 and is detected by the visible light detector 111. The propagation affecting member 87 is preferably constructed of a material that transmits infrared radiation, but is opaque to visible light. The propagation affecting member 87 may be monolithic or may have other constructions such as an outer layer (not shown) that transmits infrared radiation, but does not transmit visible light and an inner layer or core that is transmissive to both infrared radiation and visible electromagnetic radiation.
Referring now to
The boundary B of the electromagnetic radiation propagation affecting member 87 can be made of the same material as the remainder of the member. The material at the boundary B may be more “polished” (i.e., more specular) than elsewhere to increase its ability to reflect electromagnetic radiation impinging upon the boundary. However, it is also possible that the central part of the member 87 could be formed of a separate material. In that case, the member 87 would be formed of an inner and an outer member, such as described below in regard to
In one embodiment, the IR emitter 105 and IR detector 109 are both operated intermittently to detect the presence of the safety interlock device 61 on the seat 91. The IR emitter 105 is operated to generate a pattern of infrared radiation pulses. The IR detector 109 is operated in a series of detector activations or pulses that check for the presence of electromagnetic radiation from the IR emitter 105. Typically, the number of activations from the IR detector 109 will be greater than the number of pulses from the IR emitter 105 for a given period of time. For example, the IR detector 109 may have two activations in a three second time period and the IR emitter 105 may be programmed to generate one pulse of infrared radiation during the three second time period. During the three second time period, the pump 1 has a ratio of detector activations to emitter activations of about 2:1. It is understood that the pump 1 may have other ratios and that the IR emitter 105 and IR detector 109 may operate in other predetermined intermittent patterns without departing from the scope of this invention. The IR detector 109 and the controller 77 may be configured for recognizing a particular, and for example irregular, pattern of activations of the IR emitter 105.
The safety interlock device 273 of this embodiment may be constructed by a “co-injection molding” process also referred to as a “two-shot injection molding” process. The process includes injection molding the safety interlock device 273 with the electromagnetic radiation propagation affecting member 279 comprising an infrared radiation transmissive material (e.g., light transmissive thermoplastic polymer resin) together with the IR blocking layer 275 (e.g., an opaque thermoplastic polymer resin). Other variations of this embodiment may include the use of a visible light blocking material (e.g., thermoplastic polymer resin mixed with red dye) instead of an IR blocking material to allow infrared electromagnetic radiation to pass through the safety interlock device but prevent visible light from passing through the device.
In the embodiment of
The infrared signal emitted by the IR emitter 427 is diffused and reflected in the safety interlock device 461 such that the signal strikes the IR detector 429 when the feeding set 405 is properly loaded. The seat 421 and safety interlock device 461 of this embodiment are especially useful in operating in a dark room since the visible light emitter 433 provides a second electromagnetic radiation signal (e.g., a blue light) that substitutes for visible light not present in a dark room. The control system of this embodiment first pulses the IR emitter 427 until the IR detector 429 receives a signal recognizing that the safety interlock device 461 is loaded. Next, the visible light emitter 433 is activated to send a light signal that is blocked by the safety interlock device 461 if the safety interlock device is correctly located in the seat 421. The visible light detector 435 is operated to check for the visible light signal and to detect excess ambient light. If either condition is detected (i.e., light from emitter 433 or excess ambient light), a controller 477 activates an alarm that warns the operator to check the alignment of the feeding set 405 and does not allow the pump 401 to operate until the condition is corrected. The blockage of ambient light by the safety interlock device 461 causes the controller 477 to recognize that the set is loaded and the pump may be operated. The pump 401 detects a fault condition if the visible light detector 435 detects the visible light signal from the visible light emitter 433 after the IR detector 429 detects the presence of the safety interlock device 461.
Referring to
At the outset as shown in
In the next decision block 1406, the software subsystem 482 can operate to bypass evaluation of the visible light detector 435 in a situation where either the Ambient Lock is ON (because infrared radiation was detected by detector 429 when the IR emitter 427 was OFF), or where the IR emitter 427, IR detector 429 and visible light emitter 433 are all OFF. In the present case, Ambient Lock is OFF and both the IR emitter 427 and IR detector 429 are ON, so the software proceeds to read the visible light detector 435 at block 1408. The properly located safety interlock device 461 blocks the visible light detector 435 so the reading is OFF. Thus when queried at the next decision block 1410, the answer is “no” and the program moves to the next decision block 1412. The visible light emitter 433 has not been turned on yet so the program causes the visible light emitter to be turned on at block 1414 and moves to the end of the program where there is a delay 1415. The InstantOutput and Output were both initialized to OFF so that the pump 401 is not yet allowed to run. After the delay at 1415, the program returns to step 1400. The intermittent operation of the IR emitter 427 and conditional operation of the visible light emitter 433 provides significant power savings in operation of the pump 401. This feature is helpful when the pump 401 is operated on battery power.
Proceeding back to the toggling step 1400, the IR emitter 427 is now turned OFF and the IR detector 435 reads OFF when it is queried at 1404 after the delay. As a result, the Ambient Lock stays OFF so that when the next decision block 1406 is reached the answer is again in the affirmative and the visible light detector 435 is read once again at 1408. The safety interlock device 461 still blocks the visible light detector 435 so the visible light detector is OFF. Unlike the first loop through the program steps, the visible light emitter 433 is now on so the program moves on to set the InstantOutput to ON at block 1416, indicating that the pump 401 should be allowed to operate for pumping fluid. However, the program may not immediately allow the pump 401 to operate. As indicated in the next action block 1418, output filtering may be used before the final Output is given. For instance, the software may require at block 1418 that there be a number of occurrences of the InstantOutput 1416 being set to ON before the final Output 1418 is set to ON. Various algorithms for establishing confidence in the final output of the program could be employed. On the other hand, output filtering could be omitted in which case the Output 1418 would be equivalent to the InstantOutput 1416 in every instance. In either case, once the Output 1418 is set to ON, the pump 401 is allowed to operate. Once operation of the pump 401 is permitted, a routine for checking to make sure the safety interlock device 461 remains in position can be executed. In the illustrated embodiment, this is accomplished by continued operation of software subsystem 482. It is also envisioned that the visible light emitter 433 could be turned off again to conserve power. Various ways of operating the IR emitter 427 and visible light emitter 433 intermittently can be employed within the scope of the present invention.
It will be appreciated that there are several circumstances in which the software subsystem 482 would prevent operation of the pump 401 by detecting fault conditions indicative of the safety interlock device 461 of the feeding set 405 not being properly positioned on the pump. Reference is also made to
In the first condition or state of
The second condition of
Condition 4 illustrates a situation in which ambient electromagnetic radiation in the environment surrounding the pump 401 is detected by the IR detector 429. The IR emitter 427 is OFF, so the software subsystem 482 may know that the infrared radiation is not coming from the IR emitter. In that event, the software subsystem 482 receives a “yes” answer to the query at block 1404 and then sets AMBIENT LOCK to ON in block 1404b. As a result, the software subsystem 482 bypasses at block 1406 any evaluation of the presence of visible light and sets InstantOutput to OFF at 1422. In condition 5, the safety interlock device 461 is not in place so that the initial reading at block 1402 of the IR detector 429 with the IR emitter 427 ON will be that the IR detector is OFF. The software subsystem 482 will immediately proceed after block 1406 through blocks 1420 and 1422 to set Output (at block 1418) to OFF without any further evaluation of visible light. The pump 401 may also be configured to indicate there is a BRIGHT ambient light condition such as might occur if the pump was placed in or near a window in home use. The indication of bright ambient light would instruct the user to move the pump to a lower light location.
The software subsystem 482 is also capable of detecting a condition in which there is excessively bright ambient light. As shown in condition 7, the IR emitter 427 and IR detector 429 are both ON, which is indicative of the feeding set 405 being properly positioned on the pump 401. In fact, the set 405 either has not been properly loaded, or an improper set that does not block visible light has been loaded. However, although the visible light emitter 433 is OFF, the visible light detector 435 detects visible light. The software subsystem 482 proceeds at decision block 1410, when the visible light detector 435 is ON, to block 1420 and 1422 so InstantOutput is set to OFF and the pump 401 cannot run.
Another software subsystem 484 that could be used to operate the controller 477 of the pump 401 is illustrated in
Conditions 4 and 6 both result in the software subsystem 484 setting Output 1442 to ON and allowing the pump 401 to operate because the feeding set and safety interlock device 461 are detected. Conditions 5 and 7 illustrate circumstances in which the detection of visible light by the visible light detector 435 prevents operation of the pump even though infrared radiation has been detected by the IR detector 429. In condition 7, the visible light detector 435 may be detecting either light from the visible light emitter 433 or from ambient. In either case, the pump 401 is not permitted to operate. In
When the safety interlock device 603 is loaded in the pump 601 infrared electromagnetic radiation from the IR emitter 616 is diffused and reflected through the safety interlock device and detected by the IR detector 617 to verify that the set has been loaded. Next, the visible light detector 609 will check for visible light in the pump 601 will not detect any because of the location of the blocking portion 607 of the safety interlock device 603 that blocks visible light. In the embodiment of
The safety interlock device 703 comprises an outer member 704 and an inner member 706. The outer member includes an upper tubular portion 708, a lower tubular portion 710 and an annular flange 712. The annular flange has upper and lower annular channels 714. In the illustrated embodiment, the channels allow less material to be used, but have no effect on the operation of the safety interlock device 703. A first tube section 757 of a feeding set is received in the upper portion 708 of the outer member 704 of the safety interlock device 703 and a second tube section 763 is received over the lower portion 710 of the outer member.
The outer member 704 is made of the material that selectively blocks visible light and passes infrared radiation. The inner member 706 can be made of the same material as the outer member, or of a different material. However, the inner member 706 is substantially opaque to electromagnetic radiation in the infrared range and also in the visible range, and is also preferably highly reflective. In the illustrated embodiment, the inner member 706 is made of the same material as the outer member 704, but is white in color. The inner member 706 can be formed as one piece with the outer member 704, such as by a dual injection or extrusion process. Additionally, the outer and inner members 704, 706 could be made as separate pieces and attached to each other in a suitable manner such as bonding or welding. The inner member 706 is positioned in the optical path of the infrared radiation that enters the safety interlock device 703, and is disposed between the infrared radiation path and first tube section 757. Accordingly, an outer surface of the inner member 706 defines an “inner boundary region” in this eleventh embodiment for reflecting infrared radiation. The inner member 706 inhibits the loss of internal reflection of infrared radiation that might be caused by the presence of certain liquids (e.g., water) flowing in the tube 757. Thus, a strong reflection of infrared radiation to the infrared radiation detector (not shown) can be made regardless of the optical characteristics of the fluid flowing through the tube 757.
When introducing elements of the present invention or the preferred embodiment(s) thereof, the articles “a”, “an”, “the” and “said” are intended to mean that there are one or more of the elements. The terms “comprising”, “including” and “having” are intended to be inclusive and mean that there may be additional elements other than the listed elements. Moreover, the use of “up”, “down”, “top” and “bottom” and variations of these terms is made for convenience, but does not require any particular orientation of the components.
As various changes could be made in the above without departing from the scope of the invention, it is intended that all matter contained in the above description and shown in the accompanying drawings shall be interpreted as illustrative and not in a limiting sense.
This patent application is a continuation application of and claims the benefit of priority under 35 U.S.C. §120 to co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/430,113, filed Mar. 26, 2012 entitled METHOD FOR USING A PUMP SET HAVING SECURE LOADING FEATURES, which is a continuation of Ser. No. 12/757,187, filed Apr. 9, 2010, titled METHOD FOR USING A PUMP SET HAVING SECURE LOADING FEATURES, which is a continuation application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/366,227, filed Mar. 2, 2006, titled METHOD FOR USING A PUMP SET HAVING SECURE LOADING FEATURES, the entireties of each which is incorporated by reference for all purposes.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2483924 | Moulinier | Oct 1949 | A |
3432128 | Elleboudt | Mar 1969 | A |
3435209 | Keahl | Mar 1969 | A |
3523179 | Edwards et al. | Aug 1970 | A |
3673476 | Hamburg | Jun 1972 | A |
3675653 | Crowley et al. | Jul 1972 | A |
3693025 | Brunton | Sep 1972 | A |
3851976 | Meier | Dec 1974 | A |
3915407 | Zaydowicz et al. | Oct 1975 | A |
3982162 | Olliffe | Sep 1976 | A |
3985133 | Jenkins et al. | Oct 1976 | A |
3987303 | Stoft et al. | Oct 1976 | A |
3993061 | O'Leary | Nov 1976 | A |
4038982 | Burke et al. | Aug 1977 | A |
4075481 | Stoft et al. | Feb 1978 | A |
4080967 | O'Leary | Mar 1978 | A |
4126132 | Portner et al. | Nov 1978 | A |
4300048 | Barbier et al. | Nov 1981 | A |
4346296 | Passaro et al. | Aug 1982 | A |
4424011 | O'Brien et al. | Jan 1984 | A |
4454763 | Mahler | Jun 1984 | A |
4504263 | Steuer et al. | Mar 1985 | A |
4508422 | Karlsson | Apr 1985 | A |
4525069 | Tanaka et al. | Jun 1985 | A |
4529401 | Leslie et al. | Jul 1985 | A |
4537561 | Xanthopoulos | Aug 1985 | A |
4646144 | Ishida et al. | Feb 1987 | A |
4652260 | Fenton, Jr. et al. | Mar 1987 | A |
4665391 | Spani | May 1987 | A |
4714463 | Archibald et al. | Dec 1987 | A |
4720636 | Benner, Jr. | Jan 1988 | A |
4763032 | Bramm et al. | Aug 1988 | A |
4772273 | Alchas | Sep 1988 | A |
4785322 | Harrison et al. | Nov 1988 | A |
4788444 | Williams | Nov 1988 | A |
4792424 | Loman | Dec 1988 | A |
4797655 | Orndal et al. | Jan 1989 | A |
4806751 | Abe et al. | Feb 1989 | A |
4818922 | Sears et al. | Apr 1989 | A |
4827430 | Aid et al. | May 1989 | A |
4845487 | Frantz et al. | Jul 1989 | A |
4845489 | Hormel | Jul 1989 | A |
4850807 | Frantz | Jul 1989 | A |
4878896 | Garrison et al. | Nov 1989 | A |
4882575 | Kawahara | Nov 1989 | A |
4884013 | Jackson et al. | Nov 1989 | A |
4884065 | Crouse et al. | Nov 1989 | A |
4909797 | Timothy | Mar 1990 | A |
4913703 | Pasqualucci et al. | Apr 1990 | A |
4933563 | Thus | Jun 1990 | A |
4940050 | Forssmann et al. | Jul 1990 | A |
4944748 | Bramm et al. | Jul 1990 | A |
4945244 | Castleman | Jul 1990 | A |
4950235 | Slate et al. | Aug 1990 | A |
4958910 | Taylor et al. | Sep 1990 | A |
4976590 | Baldwin | Dec 1990 | A |
5055001 | Natwick et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5057081 | Sunderland | Oct 1991 | A |
5058970 | Schildkraut et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5078741 | Bramm et al. | Jan 1992 | A |
5101711 | Durbin | Apr 1992 | A |
5127908 | Walker et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
5158437 | Natwick et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
5181842 | Sunderland et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
5207645 | Ross et al. | May 1993 | A |
5211626 | Frank et al. | May 1993 | A |
5237309 | Frantz et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5237450 | Stromberg | Aug 1993 | A |
5250027 | Lewis et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
5256155 | Yerlikaya et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
5326344 | Bramm et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5330431 | Herskowitz | Jul 1994 | A |
5336174 | Daoud et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5352364 | Kruger et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5357113 | Liston et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5364364 | Kasvikis et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5383858 | Reilly et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5415641 | Yerlikaya et al. | May 1995 | A |
5433588 | Monk et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5433704 | Ross et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5436455 | Rosenthal et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5437635 | Fields et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5502111 | Huynh-Ba | Mar 1996 | A |
5508521 | Kraft et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5531680 | Dumas et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5531697 | Olsen et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5531698 | Olsen | Jul 1996 | A |
5533453 | Wolfberg et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5536935 | Klotzsch et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5560355 | Merchant et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5567120 | Hungerford et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5569026 | Novak | Oct 1996 | A |
5575284 | Athan et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5584671 | Schweitzer, Jr. et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5584811 | Ross et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5586567 | Smith et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5602664 | Doyle | Feb 1997 | A |
5604020 | Fitchmun | Feb 1997 | A |
5620312 | Hyman et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5623907 | Cotton et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5626129 | Klimm et al. | May 1997 | A |
5631730 | Chupp et al. | May 1997 | A |
5634907 | Rani et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5649810 | Schweitzer, Jr. et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5658133 | Anderson et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5661231 | Koskela | Aug 1997 | A |
5681284 | Herskowitz | Oct 1997 | A |
5683367 | Jordan et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5704912 | Lawrence et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5711654 | Afflerbaugh | Jan 1998 | A |
5721430 | Wong | Feb 1998 | A |
5741232 | Reilly et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5743878 | Ross et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5752813 | Tyner et al. | May 1998 | A |
5752910 | Cheng | May 1998 | A |
5767976 | Ankerhold et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5788674 | McWilliams | Aug 1998 | A |
5795327 | Wilson et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5798699 | Bryant et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5818049 | Bailey et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5828458 | Taylor et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5851631 | Borden et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5853386 | Davis et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5882338 | Gray | Mar 1999 | A |
5903006 | Kiuchi et al. | May 1999 | A |
5920018 | Wilkerson et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5961450 | Merchant et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5974708 | Webb et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6011985 | Athan et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6013020 | Meloul et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6015272 | Antaki et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6017326 | Pasqualucci et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6023970 | Blaine | Feb 2000 | A |
6067463 | Jeng et al. | May 2000 | A |
6078042 | Fellows | Jun 2000 | A |
6095986 | Braig et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6099502 | Duchon et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6106498 | Friedli et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6117115 | Hill et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6123686 | Olsen et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6129699 | Haight et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6162183 | Hoover | Dec 2000 | A |
6219138 | Swanson et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6227817 | Paden | May 2001 | B1 |
6234992 | Haight et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6244835 | Antaki et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6263227 | Boggett et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6299600 | Masaoka et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6325422 | Verkaart et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6330468 | Scharf | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6344030 | Duchon et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6370408 | Merchant et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6390590 | Hansburg | May 2002 | B1 |
6402717 | Reilly et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6437316 | Colman et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6447266 | Antaki et al. | Sep 2002 | B2 |
6447481 | Duchon et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6461323 | Fowler et al. | Oct 2002 | B2 |
6468242 | Wilson et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6494692 | Green | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6496711 | Athan et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6523414 | Malmstrom et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6528791 | Williams et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6531708 | Malmstrom et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6552145 | Okada et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6585684 | Hughett et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6616588 | Takahashi et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6617175 | Arno | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6626862 | Duchon et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6635033 | Hill et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6659976 | Beck et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6661482 | Hara | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6683679 | Belenkii | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6747276 | Watanabe | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6750468 | Malmstrom et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6759648 | Baxter et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6786879 | Bolam et al. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6811382 | Buchanan et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6821795 | Arno | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6852094 | Beck et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6863658 | Hughett et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6890291 | Robinson et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6891343 | Petersen | May 2005 | B2 |
6900449 | Bolash et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6945959 | Duchon et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6949066 | Bearnson et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6958053 | Reilly | Oct 2005 | B1 |
7009150 | Wennemann et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7018363 | Cowan et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7025716 | Meloul et al. | Apr 2006 | B1 |
7026773 | Petersen | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7029459 | Reilly | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7041082 | Blomquist et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7070575 | Beck et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7092796 | Vanderveen | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7121143 | Malmstrom et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7126495 | Netzer | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7144384 | Gorman et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7145127 | Chin et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7258534 | Fathallah et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7358481 | Yeoh et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7442186 | Blomquist | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7462170 | Fournie et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7537579 | Price | May 2009 | B2 |
7560686 | Bisch et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7570428 | Watanabe | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7578782 | Miles et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7591980 | Call et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7608059 | Harr et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7632248 | Delk et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7682345 | Savage | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7722562 | Hanlon et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7722573 | Harr et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7758551 | Wiesner et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7763005 | Knauper et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7807982 | Nishiuchi et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7927304 | Hudson et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
8021336 | Boulanger et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8052643 | Hudson et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8142404 | Knauper et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
20020030002 | Verkaart et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020036276 | Seeman | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20040036273 | McClary | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20050186377 | Hurst et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050267401 | Price et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060129104 | Cowan et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060268493 | Miyasaka et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20080013106 | Sidor et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080097340 | Fournie et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080147008 | Lewis et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20090284603 | Hsieh | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20100198144 | Knauper et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100198145 | Hanlon et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
3627011 | Feb 1988 | DE |
3910250 | Oct 1990 | DE |
0 467 805 | Mar 1995 | EP |
0 563 351 | Mar 1997 | EP |
0 718 006 | Mar 1999 | EP |
0 891 784 | Sep 2003 | EP |
0 876 825 | Feb 2005 | EP |
1542747 | Jun 2005 | EP |
1932555 | Jun 2008 | EP |
1 941 923 | Jul 2008 | EP |
8500067 | Jan 1985 | ES |
2 065 916 | Jul 1981 | GB |
2006-233014 | Sep 2006 | JP |
2008-212314 | Sep 2008 | JP |
9320440 | Oct 1993 | WO |
9320441 | Oct 1993 | WO |
9508774 | Mar 1995 | WO |
9844320 | Oct 1998 | WO |
2004028595 | Apr 2004 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Office Action dated Nov. 25, 2008 in related U.S. Appl. No. 11/366,227 now issued as U.S. Pat. No. 7,763,005—10 pgs. |
Response dated Jan. 16, 2009 to Office Action dated Nov. 25, 2008 regarding related U.S. Appl. No. 11/366,227 now issued as U.S. Pat. No. 7,763,005—13 pgs. |
Office Action dated May 12, 2011 in related U.S. Appl. No. 12/757,187 now issued as U.S. Pat. No. 8,142,404—9 pgs. |
Response dated Aug. 15, 2011 to Office Action dated May 12, 2011 regarding related U.S. Appl. No. 12/757,187 now issued as U.S. Pat. No. 8,142,404—19 pgs. |
Office Action dated Aug. 29, 2013 in related U.S. Appl. No. 13/430,113, 10 pages. |
Garcia, et al: Computational Prediction of PVC Degradation During Injection Molding in a Rectangular Channel, Polymer Engineering & Science, Jul. 2004, vol. 44, No. 7, pp. 1295-1312, Society of Plastics Engineers, United States. |
Compat Yset consisting of four photographs and description, publication date unknown but admitted as prior art, 5 pgs. |
Office Action dated Feb. 3, 2015 in related EP Application 07003686.8, 5 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140100523 A1 | Apr 2014 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13430113 | Mar 2012 | US |
Child | 14105300 | US | |
Parent | 12757187 | Apr 2010 | US |
Child | 13430113 | US | |
Parent | 11366227 | Mar 2006 | US |
Child | 12757187 | US |