The present invention relates to a vacuum pumping system for evacuating a chamber.
Vacuums are required for various purposes for example in the semiconductor processing industry or the manufacture of flat panel displays. A vacuum pumping system for generating a required vacuum may comprise a plurality of pumping arrangements which together evacuate an enclosure. Particularly, but not exclusively in the case of load lock chambers, chamber pressure cycles regularly between a relatively low vacuum and a relatively high vacuum. During part of the process cycle, when the relatively high vacuum is generated, the pumping arrangements continue to operate but are isolated from the enclosure. It is desirable to reduce the energy consumption of a vacuum pumping system in these and other circumstances.
The present invention provides a vacuum pumping system comprising a plurality of vacuum pumping arrangements for evacuating an enclosure and an auxiliary vacuum chamber for evacuation by at least one first vacuum pumping arrangement, the vacuum pumping system having a first state for evacuating the enclosure and a second state for conserving power consumed by the system, wherein in a first stage of the second state said at least one first vacuum pumping arrangement is arranged to evacuate an exhaust of at least one second vacuum pumping arrangement and in a second stage the exhaust of said at least one first pumping arrangement is arranged to be evacuated by the auxiliary vacuum chamber.
The present invention also provides a vacuum pumping system comprising a plurality of vacuum pumping arrangements for evacuating an enclosure, the vacuum pumping system having a first state for evacuating the enclosure and a second state for conserving power consumed by the system, wherein in a first stage of the second state at least one first vacuum pumping arrangement is arranged to evacuate an exhaust of at least one second vacuum pumping arrangement and in a second stage the exhaust of said at least one first pumping arrangement is arranged to be evacuated by the exhaust of said at least one second pumping arrangement.
Other preferred and/or optional aspects of the invention are defined in the accompanying claims.
In order that the present invention may be well understood, some embodiments thereof, which are given by way of example only, will now be described with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:
Referring to
In vacuum pumping applications, during evacuation of an enclosure a vacuum pumping system generates a flow of gas from the chamber and compresses the gas for exhausting typically at atmosphere. When the enclosure is at the target pressure the vacuum pumping system is typically isolated from the enclosure and at this time the pump is referred to in the art as operating at ultimate. At ultimate, there is substantially no flow through the vacuum pumping system. In the embodiments described herein, the vacuum pumping system consumes a reduced amount of energy when operating at ultimate compared to known vacuum pumping systems.
Referring again to
In a first stage of the power conserving state a first of the vacuum pumping arrangements 12 is arranged to evacuate the exhausts 25, 26, 28 of the second vacuum pumping arrangements 14, 16, 18. In a second stage of the power conserving state the exhaust 30 of the vacuum pumping arrangement 12 is evacuated by an auxiliary vacuum chamber 24. In the example shown in
In other examples, there may be a plurality of first vacuum pumping arrangements which in a first stage of the power conserving state are arranged to evacuate the exhausts of a plurality of second vacuum pumping arrangements and in the second stage the exhausts of the first vacuum pumping arrangements are arranged to be evacuated by the auxiliary vacuum chamber. A single auxiliary vacuum chamber is shown in
The vacuum pumping arrangements 12, 14, 16, 18 each comprise an exhaust stage and at least one lower pressure stage and preferably a plurality of lower pressure stages. The various stages of each arrangement can be formed by separate pumps although in the example shown each arrangement comprises an upstream booster pump B1, B2, B3, B4 and a downstream multi-stage dry pump DP1, DP2, DP3, DP4. The pumping arrangement 12 is shown in more detail in
Referring to both
As shown in
Referring particularly to
In the example shown, the flow path 50 comprises a flow restriction 52 for restricting flow from the auxiliary vacuum chamber to the inlet 40 along the first flow path. The flow restriction may comprise an orifice of reduced size for reducing the conductance of the flow path. Whilst a valve can be used in place of the flow restriction, the flow restriction is currently preferred because it of simpler construction and does not require a control for opening and closing a valve. Additionally, the flow restriction decreases the rate of auxiliary chamber evacuation sufficiently that it can occur during enclosure evacuation without significantly affecting the rate of enclosure evacuation. If a valve is used it is closed during evacuation of the pump exhaust and open when the auxiliary chamber is evacuated, as explained in more detail below.
The exhaust 30 of the dry pump DP1 is connected by a third flow path 54 to the auxiliary vacuum chamber 24. The third flow path comprises a valve assembly 56 between the auxiliary vacuum chamber 24 and the exhaust 30 of the dry pump DP1. The valve assembly 56 is arranged to allow gas flow from the exhaust to the auxiliary chamber during the second stage of the power conserving state and to prevent gas flow when evacuating the enclosure in the first state of the vacuum pumping system. In this regard, during enclosure evacuation gas is pumped from the dry pump DP1 typically at atmosphere and exhausted for disposal or treatment. The pressure of the auxiliary chamber would equalise with the exhaust at atmosphere without the valve assembly. It is also preferred that the auxiliary chamber is evacuated prior to use of the system and then isolated until needed to improve power conservation at least in the first cycle. The valve assembly 56 allows isolation of the auxiliary chamber.
Four one way valves 58, 60, 62, 64 are located downstream of the exhausts 30, 25, 26, 28 of the vacuum pumping arrangements. The one way valves allow gas flow during enclosure evacuation during the first state of the system 10 so that gas evacuated from the enclosure can be exhausted to atmosphere or for treatment. The valves prevent gas flow in an opposing direction during the power conserving state when the exhausts are evacuated either by the dry pump DP1 or the auxiliary vacuum chamber 24.
A control 66 is operatively connected to the valve assemblies 48, 56 by control lines and arranged to control the timing at which the valve assemblies are opened and closed.
Use of the system 10 will now be described with reference to
The system 10 can be used for evacuating an enclosure 20, for example a load lock chamber of a vacuum processing system. In such a processing system, unprocessed products are loaded into a load lock chamber which is evacuated to a target pressure. The unprocessed products are transferred to a processing chamber at the target pressure. Following processing, processed products are transferred to the or another load lock chamber which is then vented to atmosphere for removal of the processed products. The load lock chamber therefore cycles between atmosphere and a target pressure. The system 10 is capable of conserving the consumption of power when such a load lock chamber is maintained at the target pressure. The system 10 is not limited for use in load lock chambers and can be used for other applications.
Referring particularly to
At commencement, valve assemblies 48 and 56 are closed by the control 66 and the vacuum pumping arrangements 12, 14, 16, 18 are operated to evacuate the enclosure. Evacuation is preferably rapid although there may be a ‘slow start’ over an initial period to avoid generating significant turbulence in the enclosure. Depending on its initial pressure, the pressure 72 of the auxiliary vacuum chamber 24 may increase over a short duration whilst it is below the pressure at the inlet 40 of the dry pump 1 and is then subsequently reduced in pressure, as shown in the graph. The restriction 52 limits the flow of gas from the auxiliary chamber to the inlet and therefore does not unduly affect ultimate enclosure pressure. If the enclosure is evacuated to about 1 mbar then the restriction may be configured to evacuate the auxiliary chamber to about 100 mbar.
As indicated above, the auxiliary chamber (and/or the exhausts of dry pumps DP2, DP3, DP4) may be connected to an intermediate pressure stage of dry pump DP1. In this way, the auxiliary chamber is not connected directly to the inlet 40 and can be evacuated to a pressure lower than the inlet even without the restriction. For example, the auxiliary chamber may be connected to stage 36 of the dry pump which is itself evacuated to about 100 mbar during normal use.
When the target pressure T in the enclosure has been attained, the valve assembly 48 is opened and the inlet 40 of the dry pump DP1 evacuates the exhausts 25, 26, 28 of dry pumps DP2, DP3. DP4. Any increase in pressure at inlet 40 is isolated from the enclosure by booster pump B1. In an alternative a valve may be used to isolate the enclosure.
The valve assembly 48 is controlled by the control 66. Opening of the valve assembly may occur a predetermined time after commencement of chamber evacuation or in response to a pressure sensor sensing that a target pressure has been attained. In a preferred example, opening of the valve assembly is controlled by the control which is responsive to the current of the drive of one or more of the dry pumps. In this latter regard, the supply voltage to the drive is generally constant and therefore the power consumed is proportional to the current. The current is high when pumping is commenced at low vacuum pressures and gradually decreases over time as the enclosure pressure approaches the target pressure and there is less gas to be pumped. The slope of the current against time curve is greater shortly after commencement and reduces towards the target pressure. Accordingly, in the present example, the point on the current-time curve which triggers opening of valve assembly 48 is selected where the rate of change of current is still large as this point is easier to identify than a point where the rate of change is small. Since the target pressure at the trigger point has not been attained a delay is introduced between the trigger point and opening the valve assembly to ensure that the target pressure has been attained prior to valve opening.
As shown in the graph of
When valve assembly 56 is opened, the pressure 76 at the exhaust 30 of the dry pump DP1 equalises with the pressure of the auxiliary vacuum chamber thereby reducing pressure at the exhaust and reducing power consumption. The reduction in exhaust pressure is dependent on the volume of the auxiliary vacuum chamber and the pressure prior to equalisation, together with the volume of the exhaust stage. Accordingly, the volume and pressure of the auxiliary vacuum chamber is selected to achieve a required reduction in exhaust pressure without unduly affecting enclosure evacuation. If for example the required pressure reduction in the exhaust stage is from 1000 mbar to 200 mbar and the volume of the exhaust stage is ‘x’ m3, then the auxiliary vacuum chamber may have a volume of ‘10x’ m3 and a pressure of 120 mbar. It should also be considered that the volume of the exhaust stage includes the pipework between the exhaust and the valve assembly (which must also be evacuated) 56 and therefore the valve assembly 56 is located adjacent or as close as practical to the exhaust.
When the enclosure has been maintained at the target pressure T for the required period it is vented to increase its pressure to atmosphere. The cycle explained with reference to
The reduction in power consumption of the system 10 is dependent on a number of factors as explained above, such as pressure decrease at the exhausts 30, 25, 26, 28 and the period at which the system is operated at ultimate. However, savings of approximately 10 to 20% have been shown by experimentation.
Another vacuum pumping system 80 will now be described with reference to
Referring to
As described with reference to
In use, the first stage of the power conserving state is similar to that of system 10 and need not be described again. In the second stage, the exhaust stage of the first vacuum pumping arrangement 12 is connected to the previously evacuated exhaust stages of the second vacuum pumping arrangements 14, 16, 18 by opening valve assembly 56. When valve assembly 56 is opened the pressure in the exhaust stages of the first and second vacuum pumps equalise and power consumption is reduced. Valve assembly 48 is closed at this stage otherwise the inlet 40 of dry pump DP1 will be connected to the exhaust of the dry pump.
The system 80 does not conserve power to the same extent as system 10 but is simpler in construction and lower cost.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1302530 | Feb 2013 | GB | national |
This application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 14/767,534, filed Aug. 12, 2015 which is a national stage entry under 35 U.S.C. § 371 of International Application No. PCT/GB2014/050209, filed Jan. 28, 2014, which claims the benefit of G.B. Application 1302530.9, filed Feb. 13, 2013. The entire contents of U.S. application Ser. No. 14/767,534, International Application No. PCT/GB2014/050209 and G.B. Application 1302530.9 are incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4850806 | Morgan | Jul 1989 | A |
5039280 | Saulgeot et al. | Aug 1991 | A |
5595477 | Am linger | Jan 1997 | A |
20040126244 | Savidge | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20080089793 | Coles | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080260545 | Frokjaer | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20100266433 | Suzuki | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20110164992 | Shibayama | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20130028757 | Stones | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20150377226 | Stones et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Jun. 4, 2014 in counterpart International Application PCT/GB2014/050209, 10 pgs. |
Combined Search and Examination Report under Sections 17 and 18(3) dated Jul. 30, 2013 in counterpart GB Application No. GB1302530.9, 5 pgs. |
Translation of Office Action dated Jun. 1, 2017 in counterpart TW Application No. 103104619, 4 pps. |
Prosecution history of U.S. Appl. No. 14/767,534 dated Aug. 12, 2015 through May 21, 2018, 55 pp. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20180372081 A1 | Dec 2018 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 14767534 | US | |
Child | 16117886 | US |