The present invention relates to push brooms. More precisely, the present invention relates to a push broom head and a method of fabrication thereof.
Different types of push brooms typically apply to different types of anticipated particles to be swept and to different types of sweeping surfaces, based on the fact that different type of bristles removing different types of particles depending on the sweeping surface.
Some broom heads combine bristles of different stiffness so as to efficiently remove a range of particles in one operation with a single broom. It has been found that coarse forward bristles are efficient in sweeping heavy particles while rear less coarse bristles take up finer materials that are not picked up by the coarser front bristles.
A number of configurations for broom heads were presented, including for example finer-bristled, softer border with a coarse, stiffer center section; or coarser front bristles and longer, finer rear bristles.
There is still a need in the art for a push broom head and a method of fabrication thereof.
More specifically, in accordance with the present invention, there is provided a push broom head, the push broom head comprising a base, the base comprising a leading edge and a trailing edge separated by a width of the base; and tufts of bristles of a same free length extending from a surface of the base; wherein the tufts of bristles are arranged in rows of bristles of decreasing stiffness from the leading edge to the trailing edge of the base.
There is further provided a method for making a push broom head, the method comprising providing a base having a leading edge and a trailing edge; and securing rows of bristles of decreasing stiffness from the leading edge to the trailing edge of the base.
Other objects, advantages and features of the present invention will become more apparent upon reading of the following non-restrictive description of specific embodiments thereof, given by way of example only with reference to the accompanying drawings.
In the appended drawings:
The present invention is illustrated by the following non-limiting examples.
A broom head 10 as illustrated for example in
The base 12 supports bristles or tufts of bristles extending from the surface facing a surface to be swept in normal us, i.e. the lower surface 14 in the present example.
In embodiments illustrated herein, tufts of bristles are arranged in rows generally parallel to the leading edge 18 and the trailing edge 20 of the base 12.
In
The central lines of the rows are extrapolated by dashed lines in
Leading rows, referring to rows positioned closest to the leading edge 18 of the base 12, for example within the first third of the width W of the base 12 from the leading edge 18, comprise rows of tufts 30a and 30b of very stiff bristles. For example, PVC bristles of a diameter 0.060″ for a length of 2.9′, with rest angles θa of about 9°, and θb of about 6° respectively are selected. At least two leading rows a and b of very stiff tufts are used, and they are offset along the length L of the base 12 (see Δ in
Middle rows immediately downstream of the leading rows from the leading edge of the base, i.e. for example within the middle third of the width W of the base 12, comprise tufts 30c and 30d of bristles having a smaller stiffness that the leading rows, such as for example PET bristles of a diameter of about 0.029″ for the same length (I) of 2.9′, with rest angles θc of about 1°, and θd of about 1° respectively.
A trailing row, i. e closest the trailing edge 20 of the base 12, comprise tufts of bristles 30f having a still smaller stiffness, for example PET bristles of a diameter of about 0.018″ for a length of 2.9′, with a rest angle θf of about −9°. The bristles of the tufts 30d may be flagged, for increased picking up efficiency of finer particles such as dust fine.
Additional tufts 30e may be provided between the middle rows and the trailing row, for picking up finer particles such as dust or sand. The additional tufts of bristles 30e may have a stiffness smaller than the tufts of bristles of the trailing row, for example PET bristles of a diameter of about 0.014″ for a length (l) of 2.9°, with rest angle θe of about −6°. At a constant diameter and free length and type of material, these bristles of tufts 30e may be crimped.
Table I summarizes such arrangement
Stiffness—, also referred herein as rigidity, may be characterized by the deformation of bristles when submitted to a force, as shown in
The rigidity (stiffness) may be obtained as the ratio of the applied load over deformation. Under a same load, the deformation of the bristles of the leading rows (a, b) is 0.016 po as opposed to 0.25 po for the bristles of the trailing row (f); yielding a ratio of the rigidity of the bristles of the leading rows (a, b) over the rigidity of the bristles of the trailing row (f) of 0.25/0. 016=15.6, meaning that the rigidity of the bristles of the leading rows is 15.6 times larger than the rigidity of the bristles of the trailing row. The ratio of the rigidity of the bristles of the leading rows (a, b) over the rigidity of the bristles of the middle rows (c, d) is 0.0355/0. 016=2.2, meaning that the rigidity or stiffness of the bristles of the leading rows is 2.2 times larger than the rigidity of the bristles of the middle rows. The ratio of the rigidity of the bristles of the middle rows (c, d) over the rigidity of the bristles of the trailing row (f) of 0.25/0.0355=7, meaning that the rigidity of the bristles of the middle rows (c, d) is 7 times larger than the rigidity of the bristles of the trailing row (f).
The ratio of the rigidity of the bristles of the bristles of the trailing row (f) over the rigidity of the additional row (e) may be obtained as 4,8512/2,152 (see last column of Table II)=2.27 meaning that the rigidity of the bristles of the of the trailing row the trailing row (f) is 2.27 times larger than the rigidity of the bristles of the additional row (e).
According to an embodiment of an aspect of the present disclosure, a ratio of the rigidity of the bristles of the leading rows over the rigidity of the bristles of the trailing row is selected in a range between about 10 and about 20. The ratio of the rigidity of the bristles of the leading rows over the rigidity of the bristles of the middle rows may be selected in a range between about 1.5 and about 20, for example of about 2 in the example above. The ratio of the rigidity of the bristles of the middle rows over the rigidity of the bristles of the trailing row may be selected between about 1.5 and about 20, for example of about 7.0.
The present push broom head thus comprises very stiff bristles on the leading edge thereof, amounting for about ⅓ of the number of tufts of the broom head, and much less stiff or unbending under a same load, bristles downstream of the leading rows from the leading edge, especially bendable tufts of bristles in the trailing row. The bristles may be in a same material, and of a same free length from the surface of the broom head. The rest angle of the very stiff bristles on the leading edge may be selected of most 10° and the rest angle d for the trailing rows may be selected of at most −10°.
Under use, when a user applies a force (F) to the broom head, the very stiff bristles at the leading edge of the broom head resist folding backwards from the leading edge upon contacting the surface being swept (G) and when the friction surface between the surface being swept (G) and the bristles increases, as schematically shown in
As a result, resistance to the user's force (F) is reduced, hence an increased ease of handling by the user for an efficient sweeping action, the leading rows loosening and moving heavier particles and the trailing rows loosening and moving finer particles not acted upon by the stiff leading rows.
Moreover, the bristles at the trailing edge, although more bendable and typically finer, i.e. of a reduced diameter, are protected against premature or excessive wear as the leading edge of the broom head, i.e. the stiff leading rows, supports the pressure.
The present broom head is thus efficient both on a range of particles sizes, from heavier to finer particles, and on a range of surfaces, from smooth to very rough, while preventing premature or excessive wear of any of the leading or trailing bristles.
The scope of the claims should not be limited by the embodiments set forth in the examples, but should be given the broadest interpretation consistent with the description as a whole.
This application claims benefit of U.S. provisional application serial No. U.S. 62/829,248, filed on Apr. 4, 2019. All documents above are incorporated herein in their entirety by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2043758 | Lay | Jun 1936 | A |
D265697 | Libman et al. | Aug 1982 | S |
4468830 | Batchelor | Sep 1984 | A |
4468832 | Batchelor | Sep 1984 | A |
4509224 | Batchelor | Apr 1985 | A |
4524938 | Strahs et al. | Jun 1985 | A |
4528713 | Libman | Jul 1985 | A |
4550829 | Strahs | Nov 1985 | A |
4553282 | Batchelor | Nov 1985 | A |
D284908 | Libman | Aug 1986 | S |
D287173 | Libman | Dec 1986 | S |
4706323 | Batchelor | Nov 1987 | A |
4723663 | Learn | Feb 1988 | A |
4756039 | Pardo | Jul 1988 | A |
4792256 | Batchelor | Dec 1988 | A |
4794663 | Vosbikian | Jan 1989 | A |
4831678 | Dietsche | May 1989 | A |
D302759 | Batchelor | Aug 1989 | S |
D303178 | Saunders | Sep 1989 | S |
D303323 | Saunders | Sep 1989 | S |
4862550 | Batchelor | Sep 1989 | A |
D304649 | Saunders | Nov 1989 | S |
D306525 | Saunders | Mar 1990 | S |
D306526 | Saunders | Mar 1990 | S |
D307674 | Saunders | May 1990 | S |
D307981 | Saunders | May 1990 | S |
D315642 | Furgale | Mar 1991 | S |
5010616 | Berti | Apr 1991 | A |
D320889 | Berti | Oct 1991 | S |
D332701 | Berti | Jan 1993 | S |
D346905 | Berti | May 1994 | S |
D348357 | Libman | Jul 1994 | S |
5337440 | Vosbikian et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5343586 | Vosbikian | Sep 1994 | A |
5350111 | Vosbikian | Sep 1994 | A |
5367737 | Vosbikian et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5371916 | Vosbikian | Dec 1994 | A |
D354170 | Libman | Jan 1995 | S |
5412835 | Vosbikian et al. | May 1995 | A |
5415343 | Vosbikian | May 1995 | A |
5425153 | Vosbikian | Jun 1995 | A |
D364962 | Vosbikian | Dec 1995 | S |
5502862 | Vosbikian | Apr 1996 | A |
5537707 | Middleton | Jul 1996 | A |
D383269 | Berti | Sep 1997 | S |
D386908 | Berti | Dec 1997 | S |
D387910 | Berti | Dec 1997 | S |
5839145 | Petner | Nov 1998 | A |
D411920 | Vosbikian et al. | Jul 1999 | S |
D412065 | Berti | Jul 1999 | S |
D412248 | Berti | Jul 1999 | S |
5920945 | Libman | Jul 1999 | A |
6128800 | Vosbikian | Oct 2000 | A |
D433571 | Ancona et al. | Nov 2000 | S |
6321409 | Libman | Nov 2001 | B1 |
D455562 | Libman | Apr 2002 | S |
D456617 | Libman | May 2002 | S |
D456618 | Libman | May 2002 | S |
6393647 | Libman | May 2002 | B1 |
6419415 | Vosbikian et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6594850 | Libman et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6606756 | Fernandez | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6658689 | Vosbikian | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6820301 | Petner | Nov 2004 | B2 |
D501088 | Libman et al. | Jan 2005 | S |
6851153 | Lehman | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6872026 | Petner | Mar 2005 | B2 |
D509066 | Vosbikian | Sep 2005 | S |
D509364 | Berti | Sep 2005 | S |
D509659 | Weaver | Sep 2005 | S |
D509661 | Berti | Sep 2005 | S |
D509964 | Berti | Sep 2005 | S |
D511046 | Berti | Nov 2005 | S |
6971138 | Berti | Dec 2005 | B2 |
D515822 | Libman et al. | Feb 2006 | S |
7065824 | Petner | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7131170 | Weaver | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7152748 | Vosbikian | Dec 2006 | B2 |
D537255 | Berti | Feb 2007 | S |
7178681 | Libman | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7290311 | Vosbikian et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
D561476 | Vosbikian et al. | Feb 2008 | S |
D568616 | Berti | May 2008 | S |
7537115 | Weaver | May 2009 | B2 |
7549194 | Vosbikian et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7717524 | Weaver | May 2010 | B2 |
7721380 | Libman et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7730571 | Libman | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7819487 | Weaver | Oct 2010 | B2 |
D627978 | Libman | Nov 2010 | S |
8028366 | Grabowski | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8402590 | Larson | Mar 2013 | B1 |
8904591 | Vosbikian et al. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
8925134 | Vosbikian et al. | Jan 2015 | B2 |
D785948 | Weaver et al. | May 2017 | S |
9655492 | Schiavo et al. | May 2017 | B2 |
9681789 | Weaver et al. | Jun 2017 | B2 |
D798519 | Libman et al. | Sep 2017 | S |
D828668 | Libman et al. | Sep 2018 | S |
20030226784 | Petner et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20050263466 | Libman | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050285439 | Kubaitis | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060010848 | Vosbikian | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060117511 | Weaver | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060225251 | Vosbikian et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060230562 | Vosbikian et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20070101529 | Garcia | May 2007 | A1 |
20070180639 | Libman et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20080189887 | Vosbikian et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20090211935 | Weaver | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20100212096 | Libman | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20110308025 | Vosbikian et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120180235 | Libman et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120195674 | Mandle et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20130319195 | Talken et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20170156562 | Schiavo et al. | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20170172288 | Bart et al. | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20180015607 | Weaver et al. | Jan 2018 | A1 |
20180070790 | Weaver et al. | Mar 2018 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
130330 | Jan 1911 | CA |
762138 | Jul 1967 | CA |
914865 | Nov 1972 | CA |
941560 | Feb 1974 | CA |
1219408 | Mar 1987 | CA |
1219409 | Mar 1987 | CA |
2560184 | Oct 2005 | CA |
2676366 | Oct 2005 | CA |
114433 | Apr 2007 | CA |
170282 | May 2017 | CA |
2894258 | Mar 2018 | CA |
1775935 | Jul 2018 | CA |
201551272 | Aug 2010 | CN |
106667385 | May 2017 | CN |
0129639 | Jan 1985 | EP |
1129658 | Sep 2001 | EP |
1753317 | Apr 2009 | EP |
2005094434 | Oct 2005 | WO |
2007092685 | Aug 2007 | WO |
2008097334 | Aug 2008 | WO |
2012103453 | Aug 2012 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20200315335 A1 | Oct 2020 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62829248 | Apr 2019 | US |