This disclosure is generally directed to compression and cooling systems. More specifically, this disclosure is directed to a push-pull compressor having ultra-high efficiency for cryocoolers or other systems.
Cryocoolers are often used to cool various components to extremely low temperatures. For example, cryocoolers can be used to cool focal plane arrays in different space and airborne imaging systems. There are various types of cryocoolers having differing designs, such as pulse tube cryocoolers and Stirling cryocoolers.
Unfortunately, many cryocooler designs are inefficient and require large amounts of power during operation. For instance, cryocoolers commonly used to cool components in infrared sensors may require 20 watts of input power for each watt of heat lift at a temperature of 100 Kelvin. This is due in part to the inefficiency of compressor motors used in the cryocoolers. Compressor motors often convert only a small part of their input electrical energy into mechanical work, leading to poor overall cryocooler efficiency. While compressor motors could achieve higher efficiencies if operated over larger strokes, the achievable stroke in a cryocooler can be limited by flexure or spring suspensions used with the compressor motors.
Cryocooler compressors also often use two opposing pistons to provide compression, but these types of cryocoolers can have mismatches in the forces exerted by the opposing pistons. This leads to the generation of net exported forces. These exported forces could be due to various causes, such as mismatches in moving masses, misalignment, mismatched flexure or spring resonances, and mismatched motor efficiencies. The exported forces often need to be suppressed to prevent the forces from detrimentally affecting other components of the cryocoolers or other systems. However, such suppression typically requires additional components, which increases the complexity, weight, and cost of the systems.
This disclosure provides a push-pull compressor having ultra-high efficiency for cryocoolers or other systems.
In a first embodiment, an apparatus includes a first piston and an opposing second piston, where the first and second pistons are configured to move inward to narrow a space therebetween and to move outward to enlarge the space therebetween. The apparatus also includes a first voice coil actuator having (i) a first voice coil connected to the first piston and (ii) a first magnet connected to the second piston.
In a second embodiment, a system includes a compressor configured to compress a fluid. The compressor includes a first piston and an opposing second piston, where the first and second pistons are configured to move inward to narrow a space therebetween and to move outward to enlarge the space therebetween. The compressor also includes a first voice coil actuator having (i) a first voice coil connected to the first piston and (ii) a first magnet connected to the second piston.
In a third embodiment, a method includes coupling a first voice coil of a first voice coil actuator to a first piston and coupling a first magnet of the first voice coil actuator to a second piston. The first voice coil actuator is configured to cause the first and second pistons to move inward to narrow a space therebetween and to move outward to enlarge the space therebetween.
Other technical features may be readily apparent to one skilled in the art from the following figures, descriptions, and claims.
For a more complete understanding of this disclosure, reference is now made to the following description, taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, in which:
As noted above, many cryocooler designs are inefficient and require large amounts of power during operation, which is often due to the inefficiency of their compressor motors. Compressor motors are typically implemented using a voice coil-type of linear motor in which a voice coil is energized to create a varying electromagnetic field that interacts with a magnet. Various cryocoolers have been designed with different configurations of linear bearings (often flexure bearings) and linear voice coil actuators to improve compressor efficiencies, but these approaches generally have one thing in common—they have actuators that are configured to push or pull a piston relative to a fixed structure. The compressor is configured so that a magnet moves with a piston and a voice coil is fixed to a base, or vice versa.
If reducing or minimizing exported forces is important, manufacturers also often employ a load cell or accelerometer feedback, coupled with independent amplifiers driving two motors that move opposing pistons. The amplifiers drive the motors, and the feedback is used to individually control the amplifiers to reduce the exported forces from a compressor. However, this can add significant complexity, weight, and cost. In general, it is often accepted that compressor motors will not be perfectly matched, so active techniques are employed to compensate for mismatches in motor efficiencies and other mechanical tolerances. In most cases, these efforts still cannot drive the exported forces resulting from piston movements down to zero, so there is a practical limit to how low the exported forces can be reduced.
In accordance with this disclosure, compressor inefficiencies and exported forces can be reduced by configuring a compressor so that a voice coil actuator (having a magnet and a coil) pushes or pulls compressor pistons against each other, rather than pushing or pulling a piston against a fixed base. In these approaches, the magnet of the voice coil actuator moves with one piston, and the voice coil of the voice coil actuator moves with the other piston. It is also possible to use multiple voice coil actuators, where the magnets of different actuators move with different pistons and the voice coils of different actuators move with different pistons. Since each actuator is pushing or pulling both pistons, the associated masses, strokes, and suspension resonances are matched, and the efficiency of the compressor is increased. Also, the magnet-to-coil stroke is double the piston stroke. Further, the flexure or spring suspension stroke stays the same as the piston stroke, which can be useful since the flexure or spring suspensions are often designed to their fatigue limits in cryocoolers.
These approaches can achieve dramatic improvements in compressor efficiencies because more mechanical work (possibly up to double the mechanical work) is being performed by each actuator applying force to two pistons rather than one. In some embodiments, this could reduce input power requirements for a compressor by up to 30%, 40%, or even more. Because each actuator includes a voice coil coupled to one piston and a magnet coupled to the other piston, this helps to passively reduce or eliminate exported forces. Passive reduction or elimination of exported forces may mean that load cells, preamplifiers, vibration control hardware and software, and a second voice coil's amplifier can be eliminated. This can significantly reduce the complexity, weight, and cost of the compressor and the overall system.
Voice coil force may be proportional to input current (Newtons/Amp) for a given actuator design, but as the actuator moves faster there is a back electro-motive force (EMF) generated proportional to velocity that cuts the force exerted by the actuator. However, the actuators in a compressor can move over a relatively small stroke and not reach a velocity at which their efficiency drops significantly due to back EMF. In fact, due to the reciprocating motion of the pistons in a compressor, the velocity goes to zero at two points in every cycle, and this concept to a first-order almost doubles the efficiency of the compressor.
There may also be a second-order drop off in efficiency over the pistons' stroke caused when a voice coil moves out of a concentrated electromagnetic field, so actuators may need to be nominally designed for double the stroke and would hence suffer some nominal drop in efficiency. Because an actuator magnet usually weighs much more than an actuator voice coil, some embodiments could be designed with two voice coil actuators, where each of two pistons includes a magnet and a voice coil from different actuators. This approach maintains symmetry and can help to keep the supported masses attached to the pistons the same, which can aid in balancing the dynamic behavior of the compressor. Both actuators could be driven by a single amplifier, and passive exported force reduction or cancellation can still be achieved. Moreover, when multiple actuators are used, there is little or no need for the two actuators' efficiencies to be matched to eliminate exported forces.
Depending on the implementation, a single actuator could be used to push or pull pistons on opposite ends, and one or more transfer lines could be used to couple both compressors to a single expander or other device. Also, multiple actuators could be operated using the same amplifier, and a “trim coil” could be employed on one piston if ultra-low exported forces is required.
As shown in
Each piston 102 and 104 includes any suitable structure configured to move back and forth to facilitate compression of a fluid. Each of the pistons 102 and 104 could have any suitable size, shape, and dimensions. Each of the pistons 102 and 104 could also be formed from any suitable materials) and in any suitable manner. The cylinder 106 includes any suitable structure configured to receive a fluid and to receive at least portions of multiple pistons. The cylinder 106 could have any suitable size, shape, and dimensions. The cylinder 106 could also be formed from any suitable material(s) and in any suitable manner. Note that the pistons 102 and 104 and cylinder 106 may or may not have circular cross-sections. While not shown, a seal could be used between each piston 102 and 104 and the cylinder 106 to prevent fluid from leaking past the pistons 102 and 104.
Various spring or flexure bearings 110 are used in the compressor 100 to support the pistons 102 and 104 and allow linear movement of the pistons 102 and 104. A flexure bearing 110 typically represents a flat spring that is formed by a flat metal sheet having multiple sets of symmetrical arms coupling inner and outer hubs. The twisting of one arm in a set is substantially counteracted by the twisting of the symmetrical arm in that set. As a result, the flexure bearing 110 allows for linear movement while substantially reducing rotational movement. Each spring or flexure bearing 110 includes any suitable structure configured to allow linear movement of a piston. Each spring or flexure bearing 110 could also be formed from any suitable material(s) and in any suitable manner. Specific examples of flexure bearings are described in U.S. Pat. No. 9,285,073 and U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/426,451 (both of which are hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety). The spring or flexure bearings 110 are shown here as being couple to one or more support structures 112, which denote any suitable structures on or to which the spring or flexure bearings could be mounted or otherwise attached.
The operation of the pistons 102 and 104 causes repeated pressure changes to the fluid within the space 108. In a cryocooler, at least one transfer line 114 can transport the fluid to an expansion assembly, where the fluid is allowed to expand. As noted above, controlled expansion and contraction of the fluid is used to create desired cooling in the cryocooler. Each transfer line 114 includes any suitable structure allowing passage of a fluid. Each transfer line 114 could also be formed from any suitable material(s) and in any suitable manner.
At least one projection 116 extends from the piston 102, and one or more magnets 118 are embedded within, mounted on, or otherwise coupled to the projection(s) 116. In some embodiments, a single projection 116 could encircle the piston 102, and each magnet 118 may or may not encircle the piston 102. These embodiments can be envisioned by taking the piston 102 and the projection 116 in
At least one projection 120 extends from the piston 104, and one or more voice coils 122 are embedded within, mounted on, or otherwise coupled to the projection(s) 120. Again, in some embodiments, a single projection 120 could encircle the piston 104, and each voice coil 122 may or may not encircle the piston 104. These embodiments can be envisioned by taking the piston 104 and the projection 120 in
The compressor 100 in
The magnet(s) 118 and the voice coil(s) 122 in
In this arrangement, the voice coil actuator pushes and pulls the pistons 102 and 104 against each other, instead of having multiple voice coil actuators separately push and pull the pistons against a fixed structure. Because of this, the voice coil actuator is applying essentially equal and opposite forces against the pistons 102 and 104. As noted above, this can significantly increase the efficiency of the compressor 100 and help to passively reduce or eliminate exported forces from the compressor 100. Note that the pistons 102 and 104 can be pulled towards each other so that their adjacent ends are very close to each other (narrowing the space 108 to the maximum degree). The pistons 102 and 104 can also be pushed away from each other so that their adjacent ends are far away from each other (expanding the space 108 to the maximum degree). Repeatedly changing the pistons 102 and 104 between these positions provides compression during multiple compression cycles. To help prolong use of the compressor 100 and prevent damage to the compressor 100, the pistons 102 and 104 may not touch each other during operation.
In the example shown in
Note that the various forms of the structures shown in
Unlike the compressor 100 in
By energizing the voice coil 222a appropriately, the electromagnetic field created by the voice coil 222a repeatedly attracts and repels the magnet 218b. Similarly, by energizing the voice coil 222b appropriately, the electromagnetic field created by the voice coil 222b repeatedly attracts and repels the magnet 218a. This causes the pistons 202 and 204 to repeatedly move towards each other and move away from each other during multiple compression cycles.
In this arrangement, the multiple voice coil actuators push and pull the pistons 202 and 204 against each other, instead of having multiple voice coil actuators separately push and pull one of the pistons against a fixed structure. Because of this, the voice coil actuators are applying essentially equal and opposite forces against the pistons 202 and 204. As noted above, this can significantly increase the efficiency of the compressor 200 and help to passively reduce or eliminate exported forces from the compressor 200. Moreover, this design maintains symmetry, and both actuators could be driven by a single amplifier. In addition, there is little or no need for the two actuators' efficiencies to be matched to eliminate exported forces.
Note that the various forms of the structures shown in
A voice coil actuator in
By energizing the voice coil 322 appropriately, the electromagnetic field created by the voice coil 322 repeatedly attracts and repels the magnet 318. This causes the pistons 302 and 304 to repeatedly move towards each other and move away from each other during multiple compression cycles.
In this arrangement, the voice coil actuator pushes and pulls the pistons 302 and 304 against each other, instead of against a fixed structure. Because of this, the voice coil actuator is applying essentially equal and opposite forces against the pistons 302 and 304. As noted above, this can significantly increase the efficiency of the compressor 300 and help to passively reduce or eliminate exported forces from the compressor 300.
Note that the various forms of the structures shown in
Unlike the compressor 300 in
By energizing the voice coil 422a appropriately, the electromagnetic field created by the voice coil 422a repeatedly attracts and repels the magnet 418b. Similarly, by energizing the voice coil 422b appropriately, the electromagnetic field created by the voice coil 422b repeatedly attracts and repels the magnet 418a. This causes the pistons 402 and 404 to repeatedly move towards each other and move away from each other during multiple compression cycles.
In this arrangement, the multiple voice coil actuators push and pull the pistons 402 and 404 against each other, instead of having multiple voice coil actuators separately push and pull one of the pistons against a fixed structure. Because of this, the voice coil actuators are applying essentially equal and opposite forces against the pistons 402 and 404. As noted above, this can significantly increase the efficiency of the compressor 400 and help to passively reduce or eliminate exported forces from the compressor 400. Moreover, this design maintains symmetry, and both actuators could be driven by a single amplifier. In addition, there is little or no need for the two actuators' efficiencies to be matched to eliminate exported forces.
Note that the various forms of the structures shown in
Although
The pulse tube expander 504 receives compressed fluid from the compressor 502 via one or more transfer lines 506. The pulse tube expander 504 allows the compressed fluid to expand and provide cooling at a cold tip 508 of the pulse tube expander 504. In particular, the cold tip 508 is in fluid communication with the compressor 502. As the pistons in the compressor 502 move back and forth, fluid is alternately pushed into the cold tip 508 (increasing the pressure within the cold tip 508) and allowed to exit the cold tip 508 (decreasing the pressure within the cold tip 508). This back and forth motion of the fluid, along with controlled expansion and contraction of the fluid as a result of the changing pressure, creates cooling in the cold tip 508. The cold tip 508 can therefore be thermally coupled to a device or system to be cooled. A specific type of cryocooler implemented in this manner is described in U.S. Pat. No. 9,551,513 (which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety).
Although
As shown in
The one or more voice coils of the one or more voice coil actuators of the compressor are again energized at step 608. This could include, for example, the amplifier providing one or more additional electrical signals to the one or more voice coils 122, 222a-222b, 322, 422a-422b. The one or more additional electrical signals cause the voice coil(s) to generate one or more additional electromagnetic fields. This repels the magnet(s) of the voice coil actuator(s) at step 610, which pushes the pistons of the compressor apart at step 612. This could include, for example, the electromagnetic field(s) generated by the voice coil(s) magnetically repelling the magnet(s) 118, 218a-218b, 318, 418a-418b. Because the voice coil(s) and the magnet(s) are connected to different pistons 102-104, 202-204, 302-304, 402-404 (either directly or indirectly via a projection), the magnetic repelling causes both pistons to move outward away from each other.
By repeating the method 600 multiple times, multiple compression cycles can occur, each involving one movement of the compressor pistons inward and one movement of the compressor pistons outward. The number of compression cycles in a given time period can be controlled, such as by controlling the driving of the voice coil actuators. As described in detail above, because each voice coil actuator has a magnet that moves with one piston and a voice coil that moves with another piston, the efficiency of the compressor can be significantly increased, and the exported forces from the compressor can be significantly decreased.
Although
In some embodiments, various functions described in this patent document are implemented or supported by a computer program that is formed from computer readable program code and that is embodied in a computer readable medium. The phrase “computer readable program code” includes any type of computer code, including source code, object code, and executable code. The phrase “computer readable medium” includes any type of medium capable of being accessed by a computer, such as read only memory (ROM), random access memory (RAM), a hard disk drive, a compact disc (CD), a digital video disc (DVD), or any other type of memory. A “non-transitory” computer readable medium excludes wired, wireless, optical, or other communication links that transport transitory electrical or other signals. A non-transitory computer readable medium includes media where data can be permanently stored and media where data can be stored and later overwritten, such as a rewritable optical disc or an erasable memory device.
It may be advantageous to set forth definitions of certain words and phrases used throughout this patent document. The terms “application” and “program” refer to one or more computer programs, software components, sets of instructions, procedures, functions, objects, classes, instances, related data, or a portion thereof adapted for implementation in a suitable computer code (including source code, object code, or executable code). The term “communicate,” as well as derivatives thereof, encompasses both direct and indirect communication. The terms “include” and “comprise,” as well as derivatives thereof, mean inclusion without limitation. The term “or” is inclusive, meaning and/or. The phrase “associated with,” as well as derivatives thereof, may mean to include, be included within, interconnect with, contain, be contained within, connect to or with, couple to or with, be communicable with, cooperate with, interleave, juxtapose, be proximate to, be bound to or with, have, have a property of, have a relationship to or with, or the like. The phrase “at least one of,” when used with a list of items, means that different combinations of one or more of the listed items may be used, and only one item in the list may be needed. For example, “at least one of: A, B, and C” includes any of the following combinations: A, B, C, A and B, A and C, B and C, and A and B and C.
The description in the present application should not be read as implying that any particular element, step, or function is an essential or critical element that must be included in the claim scope. The scope of patented subject matter is defined only by the allowed claims. Moreover, none of the claims invokes 35 U.S.C. § 112(f) with respect to any of the appended claims or claim elements unless the exact words “means for” or “step for” are explicitly used in the particular claim, followed by a participle phrase identifying a function. Use of terms such as (but not limited to) “mechanism,” “module,” “device,” “unit,” “component,” “element,” “member,” “apparatus,” “machine,” “system,” “processor,” or “controller” within a claim is understood and intended to refer to structures known to those skilled in the relevant art, as further modified or enhanced by the features of the claims themselves, and is not intended to invoke 35 U.S.C. § 112(f).
While this disclosure has described certain embodiments and generally associated methods, alterations and permutations of these embodiments and methods will be apparent to those skilled in the art. Accordingly, the above description of example embodiments does not define or constrain this disclosure. Other changes, substitutions, and alterations are also possible without departing from the spirit and scope of this disclosure, as defined by the following claims.
This application claims priority under 35 U.S.C. § 120 as a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/676,808 filed on Aug. 14, 2017. This application is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3515034 | Eklund | Jun 1970 | A |
3657877 | Huffman | Apr 1972 | A |
3802211 | Bamberg et al. | Apr 1974 | A |
3986360 | Hagen et al. | Oct 1976 | A |
4145725 | Wallis | Mar 1979 | A |
4450685 | Corey | May 1984 | A |
4511805 | Boy-Marcotte et al. | Apr 1985 | A |
4697113 | Young | Sep 1987 | A |
4797749 | Paulsen | Jan 1989 | A |
5018357 | Livingstone et al. | May 1991 | A |
5022229 | Vitale | Jun 1991 | A |
5023531 | Altemose et al. | Jun 1991 | A |
5088289 | Mita et al. | Feb 1992 | A |
5317874 | Penswick et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5342176 | Redlich | Aug 1994 | A |
5492313 | Pan et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5783915 | Shida et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5826491 | Steiger | Oct 1998 | A |
5836165 | Champion et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5978600 | Takeuchi et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6092999 | Lilie et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6098409 | Chase | Aug 2000 | A |
6129527 | Donahoe et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6256999 | Chase | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6289680 | Oh et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6327862 | Hanes | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6446444 | Chase et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6611118 | Abe et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6688113 | Kunimoto et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6762745 | Braun et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6782700 | Unger et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6809486 | Qiu et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6843057 | Yamamoto | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6933629 | Qiu et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
7062922 | Kirkconnell et al. | Jun 2006 | B1 |
7113351 | Hovanky | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7184254 | Dimanstein | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7891184 | Gimsa | Feb 2011 | B2 |
8201467 | Johnson et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8231355 | Tian et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8490414 | Hon et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8981682 | Delson et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
9145878 | McKenzie | Sep 2015 | B1 |
9285073 | Ellis et al. | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9551513 | Yates et al. | Jan 2017 | B2 |
9577562 | Conrad et al. | Feb 2017 | B2 |
10234075 | Conrad et al. | Mar 2019 | B2 |
10298164 | Savage, II et al. | May 2019 | B2 |
10323628 | Stair | Jun 2019 | B2 |
20030218854 | Dimanstein | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030234629 | Trifilo | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040000149 | Kirkconnell et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040027088 | Abe et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040168445 | Kunitani et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040174614 | Hovanky | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040232868 | Sawtell et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040234394 | Duncan et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040263005 | McGill et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050082994 | Qiu et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050168179 | McGill et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050210886 | Lynch | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20060070518 | McGill et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060104451 | Browning et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060187572 | Tan et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060290662 | Houston et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070029956 | Hofer | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070095073 | Tian et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070152512 | Tian et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070164694 | Boscolo Berto | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20080218823 | Mizoguchi | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20090015186 | Boling et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20100072842 | Johnson et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100125167 | Sugimoto | May 2010 | A1 |
20110248817 | Houston et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20120098469 | Takeuchi | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120232780 | Delson et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20130016413 | Saeedi et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130088176 | Kwon et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130154539 | Grossmann et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130169857 | Christo et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20140069115 | Bellis et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20150125323 | Stair et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1450042 | Aug 2004 | EP |
1538406 | Jun 2005 | EP |
S49-83043 | Aug 1974 | JP |
S63-238368 | Oct 1988 | JP |
2004068662 | Mar 2004 | JP |
1651054 | May 1991 | SU |
2011022769 | Mar 2011 | WO |
2013126719 | Aug 2013 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority for International Patent Application No. PCT/US2018/026691 dated Jul. 9, 2018, 12 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority for International Patent Application No. PCT/US2015/020756 dated Aug. 13, 2015, 9 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority for International Patent Application No. PCT/US2015/054039 dated Jan. 20, 2016, 13 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority for International Patent Application No. PCT/US2015/025928 dated Jul. 28, 2015, 5 pages. |
International Search Report for International Patent Application No. PCT/US2015/025928 dated Jul. 28, 2015, 4 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority for International Patent Application No. PCT/US2008/006210 dated Oct. 23, 2008, 7 pages. |
Wikipedia, “Counter-electromotive force”, printed Dec. 2014, last modified Jun. 2014, 2 pages. |
Database WPI Week 198835, Thomson Scientific, London, GB, AN 1988-248229, XP002499651 & SU 1 374 002 A, OMSK POLY, Feb. 1988, 1 page. |
Meijers et al., “Flexure Bearing Cryocoolers at Thales Cryogenics”, Cryogenic Engineering Conference, Jul. 2001, 8 pages. |
Mullie et al., “Development of the LSF 95xx 2nd Generation Flexure Bearing Coolers”, SPIE, Mar.-Apr. 2005, 7 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20190368480 A1 | Dec 2019 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 15676808 | Aug 2017 | US |
Child | 16541816 | US |