Golf club grips have evolved over the past two centuries toward the objective of better absorption of impact shocks and vibrations. This has become especially important with the advent of steel shafts with superior shock transmission to the wood shafts which preceded them. Steel shafts with internal shock and vibration absorbing elastomers have become popular in recent years. Graphite and other composite shafts have also gained popularity for their better shock absorption properties (and their reduced weight).
Putter grips have historically been of similar construction as full swing grips. The Rules of Golf (promulgated by the U.S. Golf Association or USGA) allow putter grips to have non-circular cross sections, unlike full swing club grips. They are often, therefore, larger or thicker in some sections than full swing club grips and hence even more shock or vibration absorbing.
Distance control is a vital part of effective putting. Essential feedback for determining the proper putterhead velocity for a given length putt is primarily gained through impact shock and vibration felt in a player's hands during prior putts of various lengths and slopes. Full swing club type grips with their excellent shock and vibration absorbing qualities are, therefore, very poorly suited for putters and other clubs, such as wedges and chipping clubs, used primarily for low impact shorter distance and partial swing shots. Maximum impact transmission to the golfer's hands is desirable here. Many novice golfers choose putters with “dead” grips, shafts and even polymer putterhead face impact inserts because they absorb and dampen harsh vibrations caused by impacting a ball away from the putterhead center of gravity (the “sweet spot”). Accomplished players, who hit the “sweet spot” more reliably, prefer metal faced putterheads for enhanced impact vibrational transmission to their hands (plus enhanced acoustical feedback). Unfortunately, conventional putter grips made like full swing club grips create a vibration transmission barrier between the putter shaft (usually steel) and the player's hands reducing or eliminating the vital vibrational feedback needed for distance control, or to tell a golfer he is missing the “sweet spot” of the putterhead (which causes an unintended loss of distance and directional control).
The present invention describes a grip for putters and other less than full swing clubs with enhanced impact vibration transmission from the club shaft to the hands via the use of rigid vibration transmitting protrusions attached to, in intimate contact with, or integral with the clubshaft and contacting the player's hands. Most embodiments allow the improved grips of the present invention to replace the conventional slip-on, or wrapped grips found on most putters and other clubs today. Some described embodiments of the present invention enhance impact vibrations in the vicinity of one or both of a player's hands on said grip via unique mounting and/or weighting of the grip and nearby shaft.
One object of the present invention is to provide a putter or other golf club grip with enhanced vibration transmission for better impact feedback between the putter shaft and the player's hands.
Another object of the present invention is to increase or amplify the impact vibrations transmitted to said grip via grip mounting and/or backweighting techniques.
A third object of the present invention is to provide the said grip of said present invention in such form that it can be used on new or existing putters and other clubs with conventional steel or composite shafts.
Golf club grips including almost all putter grips have traditionally been made to absorb, not enhance, or transmit impact vibrations to a player's hands. This is desirable for full swing clubs due to the harsh vibrations created when impacting a ball at clubhead speeds ranging from 35 mph to 135 mph. It is undesirable, however, for putters and other partial swing clubs where the magnitude of impact vibrations are typically an order of magnitude less and the object is distance control not maximum distance.
Cheng (U.S. Pat. No. 5,964,670) describes multiple rigid projections, attached to or integral with the golf shaft, like the present invention, but his projections are shaped and located to dampen, not transmit, or enhance impact vibrations on full swing clubs, not putters. Also, he describes a conventional leather or elastomer grip covering such projections. They are not in contact with the player's hands as is the present invention.
Downey (U.S. Pat. No. 5,261,665) describes a two piece grip, again for full impact clubs not putters, with an inner core material generally stiffer than the outer material with projections from the core material protruding to, or near the grip surface. The sole purpose and design of Downey's grip is to increase the tortional rigidity of the grip to improve the angular accuracy of full swing clubs. Despite the stiffer core, every attempt is made to preserve maximum vibration absorption in the grip. Both core and cover materials, theroplastic rubber, are vibration absorbing, not conducting materials.
Bae (U.S. Pat. No. 5,897,440) describes a grip produced by inserting numerous elastomer grommets, or “nodules” into holes in the upper end of the golf shaft with the objects of lighter weight and easier installation and replacement. The subject grip is almost the inverse of the present invention with soft energy absorbing protrusions contacting the hands vs. rigid vibration conducting protrusions.
Jaeckel (U.S. Pat. No. 5,653,644), Buchanan (U.S. Pat. No. 6,251,027 B1), and perhaps others propose all metal putter grips where the grip is an integral part of the shaft, not a grip fitted to new or existing traditional putter shafts like the present invention. Jaeckel describes a shaft stiffer than conventional steel putter shafts (he proposes use of aluminum for stiffness, but aluminum is not as stiff as steel?). He also describes and claims a very wide “D” shaped grip (over 0.93 inches) to “keep the golfer's wrists from breaking.” He does not describe or claim enhanced vibration transmission. The grip has a “textured” (sand blasted) finish to increase adhesion, but lacks any protrusions to concentrate vibrational feedback to the hands while reducing the cold or wet (clammy) feel of metal surfaces against the hands. Buchanan describes an unconventional round, oversized (over 25 mm), untapered putter shaft wherein “part of the bare shaft forms the grip.” It differs substantially from the present invention for the reasons described in Jaeckel above.
Parsick (U.S. Pat. No. 5,588,921), Terril (U.S. Pat. No. 5,993,327), and Koblentz (U.S. Pat. No. 6,123,625) all propose similar metal paddle handle type putter grips integral with, or rigidly attached to, the putter shaft. None describe or claim enhanced vibrational transmission to the hands per the present invention. None have multiple, rigid transmitting projections like the present invention. Impact vibration transmission in all three is diminished by the reduced contact surface between the golfer's hands and the paddle or leaf shaped handle. '327 and '625 describe and claim unconventional hand placement suited to their paddle grips.
Ree (U.S. Pat. No. 5,795,242) describes a golf grip (not primarily for putters) with multiple protrusions from the grip surface. All the protrusions contain magnets (for health reasons). The magnets are covered by a soft resilient layer. There is no rigid conducting path between the shaft and the golfer's hands as in the present invention.
Turner (U.S. Pat. No. 5,575,473) describes a resilient elastomer covered (no rigid conducting pathway to hands) grip for full swing clubs (not putters) with an inner rigid tube which loosely slips over conventional club shafts and is attached at the butt end and one other connecting point via a rigid connecting collar producing an enclosed inner cavity (between collar and butt) and an open cavity (collar to grip bottom). Varying the collar location varies grip “feel and sound” upon impact, again with full swing clubs.
Sears (U.S. Pat. No. 4,979,743) proposes a two cavity putter grip geometrically similar to '473 previously described, but with a single mounting point on the putter shaft at a mode of minimum impact vibration (typically 3″ to 6″ from grip top on conventionally weighted, gripped and shafted putters). The mount uses a resilient elastomer. The mounting material and mounting location minimizes vibration transmission from the shaft to the hands, the exact opposite of the present invention.
Kobayashi (U.S. Pat. No. 5,269,518), Boeckenhaupt (U.S. Pat. No. 5,465,967), Bloom (U.S. Pat. No. 6,007,431), and others, describe and claim backweighting means for putters and other clubs. Backweighting putter grips has been practiced for decades. None describe or claim backweighting such that shaft and grip vibration amplitude and transmission is maximized at one or both hands for improved impact feedback.
Preferred embodiments of the present invention utilize one or more metal, rigid plastic, ceramic or other vibration transmitting elements attached to, in intimate contact with, or integral with a conventional putter shaft or other club shaft at least some of said elements also contacting a player's hand or hands providing improved vibrational feedback upon clubhead impact with a ball.
Persons skilled in the art will appreciate that modifications and alterations of the embodiments described herein can be made without departing from the spirit, principles, or scope of the present invention. The illustrated and described embodiments must be understood as being shown only for the purposes of examples and not by way of limitation of the invention as defined in the following claims.
Applicant claims benefit of the filing date of Provisional Application No. 60/435,406, filed on Dec. 20, 2002. References CitedU.S. Patent Documents4,979,743December 1990Sears273/81R5,261,665November 1993Downey273/81B5,269,518December 1993Kobayashi273/81A5,465,967November 1995Beockenhaupt273/162R5,511,790April 1996Duran473/2015,575,473November 1996Turner473/2985,588,921December 1996Parsick473/2995,653,644August 1997Jaeckel473/3035,795,242August 1998Ree473/3035,897,440April 1999Bae et al.473/2015,964,670October 1999Cheng473/3195,993,327November 1999Terril473/2976,007,413December 1999Bloom473/2926,123,625September 2000Koblenz473/2036,251,027 B1June 2001Buchanan473/300Foreign Patent Document2,202,319September 1988(GB)
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3318602 | Kunihisa | May 1967 | A |
4819939 | Kobayashi | Apr 1989 | A |
5261665 | Downey | Nov 1993 | A |
5575473 | Turner | Nov 1996 | A |
6007431 | Bloom, Jr. | Dec 1999 | A |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20040121850 A1 | Jun 2004 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60435406 | Dec 2002 | US |