Many putters have some top marking or upper putterhead geometry indicating the intended strikepoint of the putterhead and/or the sighting aiming line (perpendicular to the strikeface). Golfers using putters without a highly visible aim line must draw an imaginary line perpendicular to the strikeface and through the golf ball to the intended target. For most golfers, a putterhead aim line provides more accurate aim than an imaginary perpendicular line from the putterhead strikeface. Generally, the longer (front to rear) and more visible the aim line is, the more accurately one can aim the putter at the target.
The Rules of Golf, as promulgated by the United States Golf Association (USGA) and the Royal and Ancient Golf Club of Scotland (the “Rules”), limit putterhead length to putterhead width. The Rules also prohibit putterhead protrusions, including those in front of the putterface and rearward from the putter face or putterhead solely for purposes of aim or alignment. Hosels or necks for connecting shafts to putterheads and bent shafts protruding forward of the strikeface are allowed. They have always been popular because it is advantageous to have the shaft axis in front of the clubhead center of gravity. This produces a static balance moment about the shaft axis which increases dynamic stability when a golfer accelerates the putterhead by applying a forward force to the shaft. This dynamic stability is most effective, by resisting putterhead rotation, when the putterhead center of gravity is directly behind the shaft axis (rather than towards the toe or heal side of it).
Since under the Rules, putterhead length (fore to aft) can not exceed putterhead width, and because the Rules do not allow appendages solely for sighting or alignment, the length of most putterhead aim lines have historically been limited to putterhead length.
Many, perhaps most, golf putters employ forward offset hosels or bent shafts (lower section) to place the shaft axis at or in front of the faceplate plane thus improving putter dynamic stability during both acceleration and ball impact by increasing the distance between the shaft axis and the putterhead center of gravity or mass (the static balance moment). Most modern putters achieve additional stability by being “face balanced”, meaning the shaft axis intersects, forward of the center of mass, a horizontal line going through the center of mass perpendicular to the putterface (assuming 0° face loft). Solheim (U.S. Pat. No. 5,292,128), Meyer (U.S. Pat. No. 5,544,883) and Klein (U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,569,098 and 5,772,525) are examples of “face balanced” putters with forward offset hosels. None of these hosels, however, go through the center plane of the putterhead like the present invention and thus are without the sight line benefits of the present invention. One can quickly determine if a putter is “face balanced” by laying the putter's shaft horizontally across two horizontal bars (or fingers) and observing whether the putterface remains horizontal (face up).
One disadvantage of using forward offset hosels or forward bent shafts to increase the static balance moment while maintaining face balancing is that the hosel or shaft creates an asymmetrical sighting picture when viewed by a golfer from above. The offset hosel or bent shaft often obscures part of the golf ball when the ball is properly centered in front of the intended strikepoint on the putterface.
Only a forward offset hosel on the centerline vertical plane of the clubhead extending directly over the ball, like the present invention, can provide a symmetrical sighting picture when viewed from above. Several forward center line hosels are found in the prior art. None, however, provide an unobstructed and elongated sight line for improved putter aiming nor do they have the ability to be “face balanced” for improved dynamic stability.
Griffin (U.S. Pat. No. 4,966,369) describes a putterhead with a forward extending centerline plane hosel. The hosel does not form an unobstructed sight line like the present invention because the shaft connection (and shaft location) block any potential sight line. The hosel forward extension is not horizontal providing a poor and inaccurate sight line to the target if the golfer's eyes are not directly above the hosel and ball. Griffin can not be “face balanced” for dynamic stability because of the centerline plane hosel connection. No rearward sight line extension is possible. The primary purpose for Griffin's design is to get the center of mass in front of the strikeface unlike the present invention.
Szokola (U.S. Pat. No. 5,267,733) describes a tubular arculate (curved) hosel extension. Unlike the present invention, it protrudes from the rear wall of the putterhead vs. the top of the strikeface before curving forward. The curved length of the hosel therefor exceeds the 5 inch USGA Rules requirement, unlike the present invention. The shaft and curved hosel extension lie in a common plane which can be adjusted. When this plane is vertical, the hosel to shaft connection and shaft blocks any potential sight line and violates the Rules of Golf which require the shaft of a putter to be at least 10° from vertical. If the shaft hosel plane is tilted 10° or more toward the player to conform to the Rules, the forward hosel extension is no longer directly over the ball and putterhead centerline like the present invention. Like Griffin, and unlike the present invention, Szokola can not be “face balanced” for improved dynamic stability. Szokola does not describe or claim an extended, unobstructed sight line. Ravaris (U.S. Pat. No. 5,340,106) and Perkins (D 272,257) describe a putterhead similar to Szokola differing from the present invention for the same reasons.
Granelli (U.S. Pat. No. 5,630,766) and Gunderson (U.S. Pat. No. 6,497,628 B1) describes a centerline vertical plane hosel extension starting at the rear of the putterhead, but it does not extend past the strikeface like the present invention. Like Griffin, Szokola and Ravaris previously cited, the shaft and shaft connection prevent an unobstructed sight line and any opportunity for face balancing.
Byrne (U.S. Pat. No. 6,422,949 B1) describes a putterhead with sight line combined with a golf ball with matching sight lines. The putterhead sight line is not provided by a vertical centerline plane forward extending hosel like the present invention.
The present invention utilizes a novel forward offset hosel design to produce a sight line or aim line which can be longer than a putterhead's length, or width. The hosel proceeds forward from a position above the intended strike point on the strikeface in a vertical plane generally perpendicular to the strikeface. The sight or aim line also extends rearward along this same plane on a rearward extension of the putterhead body extending from the strikeface at the same or different elevation in such a manner that it is optically and/or physically connected or consistent with the forward hosel extension and hosel sight line on top of it along this plane. The rearward sight line extension of the hosel sight line goes the entire putterhead length (fore to aft) or a significant portion thereof. The forward extension of the hosel can go part way or all the way to a position slightly in front of a golf ball proximate to or in contact with the strikeface. The Rules limit overall hosel length (from the sole of the putterhead to the straight portion of the golf shaft) to 5 inches. In a preferred embodiment of the present invention, it is desirable for putter dynamic stability to have the shaft axis penetrate a vertical plane through the putterhead center of gravity and intended strikepoint, such plane being perpendicular to the strikeface, at the elevation of the center of gravity. This requirement, plus the maximum 5 inch hosel length of the Rules, limits the hosel forward extension length to about one half to one golf ball diameter in front of the strike face.
One object of the present invention is to provide a long unobstructed sight line by using the top of a putterhead center line located forward hosel extension, the hosel sight line, as part of said sight line which sight line also extends rearward, the “rearward sight line” at least twice the length of said hosel sight line.
A second object of the present invention is to provide a sight line portion forward of and above the strikeface, extending over all or part of a golf ball centered in front of and proximate to the intended strikepoint.
Still another object of the present invention is to provide an increased static balance moment by moving the hosel to shaft connection point and shaft axis well forward of the strikeface and putterhead center of gravity.
The various features, advantages and operating principles of the present invention will become more apparent by reference to the following descriptions and drawings in which:
Referring to the Drawings,
Said rearward extending sight line 10 and forward extending sight line 11 may be on one level, per
Putterhead interior weight is reduced by using thin or perforated sections, or light weight materials such as aluminum, magnesium, titanium, or plastics, or combinations thereof for putterhead components interior to said mass ring. Mass ring components including the lateral 24 and rearward 25 weights can be of tungsten, lead, brass, steel, or other dense material and of longer or shorter arculate length as necessary. It is desirable to have the depth of weighting members such as 24 exceed their radial dimension both to keep most mass ring weight as close as possible to the outside mass ring diameter and to reduce the horizontal plane area and visual impact of all putterhead components outside the one golf ball diameter wide sighting field as previously described in
The preceding drawings and descriptions present various embodiments of the present invention. Variations of these descriptions utilizing the principles and teachings described, remain within the scope of the present invention.
Applicant claims benefit of the filling date of Provisional Application No. 60/468,882, filed on May 8, 2003, and priority of that date.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
D182485 | Sprinkel | Apr 1958 | S |
D259732 | Vella | Jun 1981 | S |
D271604 | Stone et al. | Nov 1983 | S |
D272257 | Perkins | Jan 1984 | S |
4629193 | Pierman | Dec 1986 | A |
4809981 | Doran et al. | Mar 1989 | A |
D308995 | Colucci | Jul 1990 | S |
4966369 | Griffin | Oct 1990 | A |
D313057 | Gebhardt | Dec 1990 | S |
4988107 | Sasse | Jan 1991 | A |
5014992 | McCallister | May 1991 | A |
5072941 | Klein | Dec 1991 | A |
5152533 | Radakovich | Oct 1992 | A |
5267733 | Szokola | Dec 1993 | A |
5292128 | Solheim | Mar 1994 | A |
5340106 | Ravaris | Aug 1994 | A |
5382019 | Sneed | Jan 1995 | A |
5489097 | Simmons | Feb 1996 | A |
5544883 | Meyer | Aug 1996 | A |
5569098 | Klein | Oct 1996 | A |
5630766 | Granelli | May 1997 | A |
D387829 | Blaine | Dec 1997 | S |
5772525 | Klein | Jun 1998 | A |
D420410 | Pegg | Feb 2000 | S |
6200227 | Sery | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6238302 | Helmstetter et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6422949 | Byrne et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
20040173964 | Pollman | Sep 2004 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60468882 | May 2003 | US |