This disclosure relates to a mounting arrangement for a gas turbine engine and, more particularly, to a mounting arrangement that includes front and rear engine mount beams that are integrally formed with respective pylon mount structures.
Pylons are used to attach gas turbine engines to an aircraft wing. Pylon mounting structures connect an engine case of the gas turbine engine to the pylon. In one known arrangement, a pylon pyramid includes a first or fore pylon mounting flange that is secured to a mating flange on a front engine mount beam at a first bolted joint. The front engine mount beam is then attached to the engine case via another bolted joint to provide a fore or front engine mount. An aft pylon flange includes a second pylon mounting flange that is secured to a mating flange on a rear engine mount beam at a second bolted joint. The rear engine mount beam is then attached to the engine case to provide a rear or aft engine mount.
The use of multiple bolted joints is disadvantageous from weight, material cost, and labor cost perspectives. Accordingly, there is a need for a mounting arrangement that provides for an easier and more cost effective assembly of a gas turbine engine to a pylon.
An example mounting arrangement for a gas turbine engine includes a pylon mount structure that has a fore mount portion and an aft mount portion. A first engine mount beam is integrally formed with the fore mount portion as a single-piece component, and a second engine mount beam is integrally formed with the aft mount portion as a single-piece component. The first engine mount beam is attachable to the engine case at a fore attachment interface, and the second engine mount beam is attached to the engine case at an aft attachment interface.
The various features and advantages of this invention will become apparent to those skilled in the art from the following detailed description of the currently preferred embodiment. The drawings that accompany the detailed description can be briefly described as follows.
The mounting arrangement 30 includes a pylon mount structure that comprises a fore portion 40 and an aft portion 42. In this example, the fore portion 40 comprises a pyramid structure that has a convergent portion 40a and a divergent portion 40b; however, other structural configurations could also be used. In the example shown, the divergent portion 40b comprises a plurality of discrete legs that extend from the convergent portion 40a toward the pylon 36. The aft portion 42 comprises a pylon mounting flange body 44 that extends downwardly from the pylon 36 toward the engine case 26. The mounting flange body 44 is positioned generally aft of the divergent portion 40b of the fore portion 40 of the pylon mount structure. In the example shown, the fore portion 40 and aft portions 42 are separate components.
As shown in
The fore engine mount beam 50 is unitarily formed with the convergent portion 40a of the pyramid structure. The fore engine mount beam 50 is then mounted to the engine case 26 to provide the front mount 32. The aft engine mount beam 52 is mounted to the engine case 26 at a rearward position to provide the rear mount 34. This configuration eliminates at least two bolted joint interfaces, which is advantageous from a cost and labor perspective.
By integrally forming the fore 50 and aft 52 engine mount beams with the respective pylon mounting structures, significant weight and cost savings are provided. Also, time consuming assembly of multiple bolted joints is avoided, which improves labor and maintenance costs.
Although a combination of features is shown in the illustrated examples, not all of them need to be combined to realize the benefits of various embodiments of this disclosure. In other words, a system designed according to an embodiment of this disclosure will not necessarily include all of the features shown in any one of the Figures or all of the portions schematically shown in the Figures. Moreover, selected features of one example embodiment may be combined with selected features of other example embodiments.
The preceding description is exemplary rather than limiting in nature. Variations and modifications to the disclosed examples may become apparent to those skilled in the art that do not necessarily depart from the essence of this disclosure. The scope of legal protection given to this disclosure can only be determined by studying the following claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4013246 | Nightingale | Mar 1977 | A |
4065077 | Brooks | Dec 1977 | A |
4428189 | Greenberg | Jan 1984 | A |
4934140 | Dennison | Jun 1990 | A |
5443230 | Lord | Aug 1995 | A |
5474258 | Taylor | Dec 1995 | A |
5746391 | Rodgers | May 1998 | A |
5775638 | Duesler | Jul 1998 | A |
6126110 | Seaquist et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6296203 | Manteiga et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6474597 | Cazenave | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6601796 | Roszak | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6708925 | Udall | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6935591 | Udall | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6988692 | Pasquer et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7104306 | Huggins et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
20040251381 | Pasquer et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050194493 | Marche | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050269445 | Chevalier et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060231679 | Chamberlain | Oct 2006 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
564126 | Oct 1993 | EP |
2375513 | Nov 2002 | GB |
Entry |
---|
Search Report from corresponding EP Application 08253736.6, Oct. 22, 2012. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20090184197 A1 | Jul 2009 | US |