This is a U.S. National Phase application under 35. U.S.C. §371 of International Application No. PCT/EP2007/057529, filed Jul. 20, 2007, and claims benefit of French Patent Application No. 06/06696, filed Jul. 21, 2006, both of which are incorporated herein in their entireties. The International Application was published in French on Jan. 24, 2008 as WO/2008/009745 under PCT 21(2).
The invention relates to a pyrotechnic device for the controlled destruction of munitions or objects containing pyrotechnic and/or chemical substances.
For example, a chemical munitions usually includes a munitions body (or casing) having metal walls. The inside of the munitions body contains one or more chemicals and a pyrotechnic bursting charge, the role of which is to open the body thereof and to diffuse the chemicals into the atmosphere. The toxic chemical agents of certain munitions are among those known by the name “combat gases” and the action thereof is of the irritating, suffocating, blistering, hemotoxic or neurotoxic type.
The munitions may be in a good state or somewhat damaged depending on their date of manufacture and on their storage conditions. The aim is to destroy these munitions as safely as possible for the personnel and the equipment involved in the destruction, and with the greatest efficiency in destroying the chemicals contained in the munitions.
The munitions may be destroyed by various mechanical, chemical, thermal, pyrotechnic or other methods.
The most common pyrotechnic methods of the prior art use, for destroying the munitions, donor charges such as:
The munitions destruction devices of the prior art, apart from the cutting cords, require the pyrotechnic and/or chemical substances, internal to the munitions or to the object to be destroyed, to react so as to obtain a significant opening of their body or their casing. They have a limited effectiveness with respect to the destruction of non-explosive chemical substances, except for the blocks of plastique and the explosives surrounding the munitions. Furthermore, the current methods of destruction generate more or less intense effects on the environment (shocks, blast, pollution, heat and fragments), depending on the architecture and the explosive of the donor charge and on the reaction of the munitions or the object to be destroyed.
Other methods of the prior art for destroying munitions consist in dismantling the munitions into its components and in collecting the chemical and pyrotechnic substances in suitable containers in order to destroy them subsequently, for example by neutralization or incineration in special furnaces.
The drawback of such a method is that it includes many delicate operations carried out on the munitions with risks for the personnel in the various steps of the method, which risks are aggravated when the munitions are in a poor state. It is frequently so after long storage under poor conditions.
Another drawback of said method is the long time needed to destroy the munitions.
The destruction device claimed in the present patent enables the various drawbacks of the destruction methods most commonly used to be alleviated.
For this purpose, embodiments of the invention provides a pyrotechnic device for the destruction of munitions by an explosive at least partially surrounding the munitions having walls for the confinement of active products, characterized in that it includes means for the controlled ignition of the explosive, these means being configured to couple explosive detonation waves into the walls of the munitions along at least two opening lines of said walls of the munitions.
The term “active products” is understood to mean pyrotechnic, chemical or other substances that may be contained by the munitions.
Advantageously, the controlled ignition means include at least two pyrotechnic ignition cords for igniting the explosive, each of the cords having a start-of-ignition end Es and an end-of-ignition end Ee, the start-of-ignition ends of the cords being connected by at least one firing means.
Initiating the ignition cords, by known firing means, causes the ignition of the cords to propagate from their start-of-ignition end to their other, end-of-ignition, end with a predetermined propagation rate.
In one embodiment of the device intended for the destruction of munitions having a shape approximating a cylinder with an axis of revolution XX′, or objects provided with a casing of any other shape, the controlled ignition means include two ignition cords which are in contact with or close to the explosive in order to initiate the explosion, on either side of the XX′ axis of the munitions, and are aligned along an opening line of the walls of the munitions.
In another embodiment of the device, intended for the destruction of munitions having a shape approximating a cylinder having an axis of revolution XX′, or objects provided with a casing of any other shape, the controlled ignition means include two pairs P1, P2 of ignition cords.
The firing means include, for example, a detonator for initiating the ignition cords via their start-of-ignition ends Es in order to cause controlled detonation of the explosive along the opening lines of the munitions.
A main objective of the destruction device according to embodiments of the invention includes obtaining a controlled opening of the walls of the munitions, or of objects, without counting on the reaction of the internal substances of the munitions.
Another objective is to control the fragmentation of the munitions body and thus reduce the effects of the emitted fragments on the environment external to the destruction device.
Another objective is the destruction of the pyrotechnic and/or chemical substances of the munitions.
The expression “destruction of the munitions” should be understood in the device according to embodiments of the invention to mean the destruction of the containers and of the contents, i.e. notably the opening of the munitions casings, the destruction of the pyrotechnic bursting charge and the destruction of the chemical agent charge.
The invention will be more clearly understood with the aid of exemplary embodiments of the destruction device according to the indexed drawings in which:
a and 1b show an exemplary embodiment of a munition destruction device according to the invention;
a and 4b show a variant embodiment of the munition destruction device according to the invention;
a and 7b show another exemplary embodiment of a munition destruction device.
a and 1b show an exemplary embodiment of a munitions destruction device according to the invention.
a shows a bottom view along AA′ of the device of
The chemical munitions 10 includes, in this example, a metal wall 12 of cylindrical shape containing a chemical product 14 and a pyrotechnic bursting charge 16.
The destruction device of
The ignition cords C11, C12, C21, C22 each have a start-of-ignition end Es and an end-of-ignition end Ee and are configured in the device so that the cords C11, C21 of the pair P1 and the cords C12, C22 of the pair P2 are separated by a predetermined angular distance α.
The angular distance α between the cords of the two pairs P1, P2 and the thickness Ep of explosive 36 are predetermined so as to obtain localized overpressures by coupling detonation waves of the explosive into the walls 12 of the munitions, which waves are powerful enough to break said wall.
In this exemplary embodiment, the cords C11, C12, C21, C22 are approximately parallel to the generatrix of the cylindrical internal walls 32 of the cylindrical container 30.
The cylindrical container 30 further includes an initiating detonator 40 connected to the start-of-ignition ends Es of the ignition cords C11, C12, C21, C22.
We will explain below the operation of embodiments of the destruction device according to the invention.
The initiating detonator 40 (see
The ignition of the cords causes detonation of the explosive 36, propagating along the propagation lines corresponding to the lines of the cords parallel to the XX′ axis of the munitions.
The simultaneous detonation of the explosive in the four ignition cords C11, C12, C21, C22 in the plane Pam perpendicular to the detonation propagation axis produces convergent Mach wave encounters in zones M1, M2 and then convergent wave encounters in zones M3 and M4 of the walls 12 of the munitions, the convergence zone M1 being on the wall 12 between the cords C11 and C22, the convergence zone M2 being between the cords C12 and C21, the convergence zone M3 being between the cords C11 and C21 and the convergence zone M4 being between the cords C12 and C22.
The convergence in the zones M1, M2, M3, M4 of the wall of the munitions of the explosive detonation waves generates localized overpressures that propagate along the wall 12 of the munitions, from a start-of-ignition zone to an end-of-ignition zone of the explosive, along the cord lines, causing the wall of the munitions to rupture and therefore open along these four propagation lines.
The explosion also produces, according to another important feature of embodiments of the invention, destruction of the chemical and pyrotechnic products contained in the munitions. For this purpose, the explosive may be based on aluminum, which produces, upon its detonation, a fireball of long duration for the purpose of destroying the chemical products, notably those contained in the munitions which is opened by the controlled explosion.
To give an example, in one particular embodiment of a device for the destruction of munitions with a diameter of less than 80 millimeters, the thickness Ep of the explosive, of the explosive water-in-oil emulsion type, is around 20 millimeters and the cylindrical container is made of PVC or cardboard. The ignition propagation rate of the ignition cords is around 7000 m/s and that of the explosive around 5500 m/s. The angle α between the cords C11 and C22 and between the cords C12 and C21 is between 35° and 45°.
a and 4b show a variant embodiment of the device for the destruction of a munitions 50 according to the invention comprising a parallelepipedal container 51. The munitions 50 has a cylindrical metal wall 52 along the XX′ axis and contains a chemical product 54.
In this embodiment shown in
The device includes the two cords C11 and C12 for igniting the explosive 56 on either side of the munitions 50 in a plane D1 passing through the XX′ axis and close to two opposed internal walls 60, 62 of the box.
In this embodiment, the overpressure waves are produced in zones M5, M6 along lines of the wall 52 of the munitions 50 in a plane P1 perpendicular to the plane D1 of the ignition cords C11, C12.
The above descriptions are not limiting and, in other embodiments of the device according to the invention, the cords for igniting the explosive surrounding the munitions to be opened may follow lines of various nonrectilinear forms. For example, lines wind around the wall of the munitions, from one end of the munitions to the other, so as to obtain an opening of helicoidal shape.
The pyrotechnic device according to embodiments of the invention makes it possible to destroy a very wide range of munitions or objects containing pyrotechnic and/or chemical substances by virtue of its capability of:
Furthermore, the pyrotechnic destruction device according to embodiments of the invention makes it possible to control the fragmentation of the body of the munitions or of the casing of the object to be destroyed and consequently the effects of the emitted fragments on the external environment.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
06 06696 | Jul 2006 | FR | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2007/057529 | 7/20/2007 | WO | 00 | 8/21/2009 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2008/009745 | 1/24/2008 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3800715 | Boller | Apr 1974 | A |
4055247 | Benedick et al. | Oct 1977 | A |
RE36912 | Donovan | Oct 2000 | E |
6220166 | Cherry | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6269725 | Cherry | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6647851 | Donovan | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6938533 | Holland et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6979758 | Eidelman et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
7036418 | Greenfield et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7398720 | Fujiwara et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7501551 | Eidelman et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7954433 | Barnett | Jun 2011 | B1 |
20030131722 | Donovan | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20040134335 | Holland et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040260141 | Badger et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050188825 | Sharpe et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20070151437 | Fujiwara et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070209500 | Wilber | Sep 2007 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2775770 | Sep 1999 | FR |
WO-2005085746 | Sep 2005 | WO |
WO2005005121 | Oct 2005 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20090308235 A1 | Dec 2009 | US |