The present invention relates to inflators for vehicle airbags and, more particularly, to a linear inflator which discharges inflation gas along the length of the inflator for use in side impact or head curtain airbag systems. In inflation systems for deploying an air bag in a motor vehicle, it is desirable to be able to modify an inflation profile produced by a given inflator design without substantial modifications to the design, in order to accommodate different desired airbag inflation profiles. One method of varying the inflation profile is to modify the composition, amount, and/or physical arrangement of gas generant in the inflator. However, this method of varying the inflation profile may entail relatively complex changes to the inflator design and components, and may also add to inflator manufacturing cost and complexity.
An inflator construction is provided for use in an inflatable vehicle occupant protection system. In one aspect of the invention, the inflator includes a longitudinal enclosure having a substantially uniform cross-sectional area along at least a portion of the enclosure, and a gas generant composition positioned along at least a portion of the enclosure. The gas generant composition is distributed substantially uniformly along the at least a portion of the enclosure. A first plurality of gas exit apertures is formed along the at least a portion of the enclosure to enable fluid communication between the enclosure and an exterior of the enclosure. The apertures of the first plurality of gas exit apertures are spaced apart a distance proportional to a desired rate of propagation of a combustion reaction of gas generant positioned between the apertures.
In another aspect of the invention, the inflator includes a longitudinal enclosure having a substantially uniform cross-sectional area along at least a portion of the enclosure, and a gas generant composition positioned along the at least a portion of the enclosure. The gas generant composition is distributed substantially uniformly along the at least a portion of the enclosure. A first plurality of gas exit apertures is formed along the at least a portion of the enclosure to enable fluid communication between the enclosure and an exterior of the enclosure. The number of apertures in the first plurality of gas exit apertures is inversely proportional to a desired rate of propagation of a combustion reaction of gas generant positioned between the apertures.
In the drawings illustrating embodiments of the present invention:
Referring to
A longitudinal gas generant enclosure 22 is inwardly radially spaced from housing 12 and is coaxially oriented along a longitudinal axis of the housing. Enclosure 22 has an elongate, substantially cylindrical body defining a first end 22a, a second end 22b, and an interior cavity for containing a gas generant composition 24 therein. Enclosure first end 22a is positioned to enable fluid communication between an igniter 26 and the enclosure interior cavity. Enclosure 22 is configured to facilitate propagation of a combustion reaction of gas generant 24 along the enclosure, in a manner described in greater detail below.
A plurality of gas generant tablets 24 are stacked side by side along the length of enclosure 22. Each tablet 24 has substantially the same dimensions. In one embodiment, each gas generant tablet 24 has an outer diameter of ¼″ and a pair of opposing, generally dome-shaped faces 27, providing a maximum tablet width of approximately 0.165″ between faces. As seen in
A quantity of a known auto-ignition composition 28 is positioned at either end of the stack of gas generant material 24. Enclosure 22 is environmentally sealed at both ends with an aluminum tape 29 or any other effective seal.
An igniter 26 is secured to inflator 10 such that the igniter is in communication with an interior of gas generant enclosure 22, for activating the inflator upon occurrence of a crash event. In the embodiment shown, igniter 26 is positioned within an annular bore of an igniter closure 30. Igniter 26 may be formed as known in the art. One exemplary igniter construction is described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,009,809, herein incorporated by reference.
Igniter closure 30 is crimped or otherwise fixed to a first end 14 of housing 12. A first endcap 32 is coaxially juxtaposed adjacent igniter closure 30 to form, in conjunction with igniter closure 30, an inner housing for igniter 26. First endcap 32 also provides a closure for gas generant enclosure 22. A second endcap 34 is crimped or otherwise fixed to a second end 16 of housing 12. Endcaps 32 and 34 and igniter closure 30 may be cast, stamped, extruded, or otherwise metal-formed. Alternatively, endcaps 32 and 34 may be molded from a suitable polymer.
A filter 36 may be incorporated into the inflator design for filtering particulates from gases generated by combustion of gas generant 24. In general, filter 36 is positioned between gas generant 24 and apertures 20 formed along inflator housing wall 18. In the embodiment shown in
In accordance with the present invention, a plurality of gas exit apertures 40 is particularly formed along enclosure 22 to tailor the rate of propagation of a combustion reaction of the gas generant 24 along the enclosure, as required by design criteria. Apertures 40 are spaced apart along enclosure 22 as described in greater detail below. Enclosure 22 may be roll formed from sheet metal and then perforated to produce apertures 40. Enclosure apertures 40 are environmentally sealed with an aluminum tape (not shown) or any other effective seal.
The effects of the sizes of enclosure apertures 40 and the spacing between the apertures on combustion propagation were studied by constructing a number of inflators substantially as shown in
A first group of 23 apertures having a 4.0 mm diameter and spaced one inch on center (OC) was first linearly formed, and then a second group of 48 apertures having a 4.0 mm diameter and spaced ½″ OC were formed collinear with the first group of apertures.
A first group of 16 apertures having a 4.0 mm diameter and spaced one inch on center (OC) were first linearly formed; next a second group of 51 apertures having a 4.0 mm diameter and spaced ½″ OC were formed collinear with the first group of apertures; and finally a third group of 20 apertures having a 5.0 mm diameter and spaced ¼″ OC were formed collinear with the first and second groups of apertures.
A first group of 12 apertures having a 4.0 mm diameter and spaced one inch on center (OC) were first linearly formed; next a second group of 47 apertures having a 4.0 mm diameter and spaced ½″ OC were formed collinear with the first group of apertures; and finally a third group of 45 apertures having a 5.0 mm diameter and spaced ¼″ OC were formed collinear with the first and second groups of apertures.
A first group of 12 apertures having a 4.0 mm diameter and spaced one inch on center (OC) were first linearly formed; next a second group of 23 apertures having a 4.0 mm diameter and spaced ½″ OC were formed collinear with the first group of apertures; and finally a third group of 91 apertures having a 5.0 mm diameter and spaced ¼″ OC were formed collinear with the first and second groups of apertures.
The term “on center” is defined to be from the center point of one orifice to the center point of an adjacent orifice. The size of the holes or gas exit apertures preferably ranges from about one millimeter to about one-half the diameter of the propellant tube. Holes smaller than one millimeter are often difficult to manufacture with consistent size and with the desired efficiency. Holes or gas exit apertures larger than half the diameter of the propellant tube weaken the structure of the tube and are therefore relatively difficult to produce.
The gas exit apertures are preferably spaced about six millimeters to 26 millimeters on center. A spacing less than about 6 mm may weaken the structure, and presents a further structural concern if the local or associated gas exit aperture size is relatively large or close to the diameter of the propellant tube. Spacing larger than 26 mm may be employed although the efficiency of the cooling screen may consequently be reduced.
As such, the present invention incorporates a tailored overall orifice or aperture area dependent on both the size and spacing of the gas exit apertures. The overall aperture area may be tailored based on various design criteria such as the composition of the gas generant and/or the desired inflation profile of an associated airbag, for example. The distribution of the overall aperture area from a relatively lower aperture area within the first half of the propellant tube (that is the half closest or adjacent to the ignition source) to a relatively larger aperture area within the second half of the propellant tube (that is the half of the propellant tube farthest from the ignition source) provides the desired combustion propagation across the length of the tube.
The percentage of the total aperture area as a function of the position of the holes from the ignition source is tabulated and exemplified below. The open area is defined as the sum of the area of each hole in the propellant tube. Starting with a known example of equally spaced holes of equal size, the orifice area is equally distributed throughout the length of the propellant tube. This results in the fastest propagation time and the shortest burnout time, or, the time required to completely combust the gas generant. As shown in Examples 1 through 4, the share of the aperture/orifice area at the ignition end of the tube is relatively smaller while the share of the orifice area at the opposite end of the ignition tube is relatively larger. This causes a proportional increase in the time it takes for the entire propellant stack to ignite and therefore affects the initial combustion rate and the duration of gas generation.
Each of the inflators was then activated, and the resulting airbag inflation pressure measured over the first few seconds of inflation.
Based on these measurements and on laboratory analysis, it is believed that after initiator 26 is activated, the propagation rate of the combustion reaction along the enclosure is dependent upon the number of apertures 40 and the spacing between the apertures along enclosure 22. More specifically, it is believed that, along the sections of the enclosure where the aperture spacing is 1″ OC, the combustion reaction propagates via hot gases because the pressure inside this portion of the enclosure is relatively high due to the relative shortage of apertures to relieve the pressure; thus, there is a driving pressure force urging the hot gases further down the enclosure. In the sections where the aperture spacing is ½″ OC, the combustion reaction still propagates via hot gases but at a slower rate because the internal pressure is relatively lower, due to the shorter distance between apertures. In the sections where the aperture spacing is ¼″ OC, apertures 40 are relatively numerous, permitting the enclosure internal pressure to be more easily relieved; thus, there is minimal driving pressure force urging the hot gases further down the length of the enclosure. In this case, the combustion reaction continues to propagate at a relatively slower rate as each tablet 24 ignites the next adjacent tablet as it burns.
Thus, from an analysis of the above examples, it is believed that a relatively greater spacing between enclosure apertures 40 produces a correspondingly greater pressure within enclosure 22, resulting in a more rapid propagation (via hot gases) of the combustion reaction along the portion of the gas generant residing between the spaced-apart apertures. The more rapid propagation of the combustion reaction results in a more rapid burning of the gas generant and, thus, a more rapid generation of inflation gas, and more rapid inflation of an associated airbag, for example. Therefore, to affect the propagation rate of a combustion reaction along a portion of the enclosure, the apertures along the portion of the enclosure may be spaced apart a distance proportional to a desired rate of propagation of a combustion reaction of gas generant positioned between the apertures. The examples therefore illustrate how the combustion propagation rate may be tailored using an appropriate arrangement of enclosure apertures, to accommodate greater or lesser desired airbag inflation rates, and also to accommodate desired shorter or longer inflation durations. It should be appreciated that the type of propellant or gas generant composition 24 employed, for example those described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,035,757, 5,872,329, and 6,210,505, each herein incorporated by reference, may also be determinative of the desired combustion propagation rate across the length of the propellant tube 22. Accordingly, the propellant employed will affect the aperture open area along the length of the propellant tube. As different propellants are employed, the “aperture open area/unit length of the propellant tube” may be iteratively determined by experimental methods to produce the desired propagation rate across the length of the enclosure or propellant tube. For example, propellant tubes containing the same propellant could be perforated with different open areas per unit length across the length of the propellant tube in accordance with the present invention, and then qualitatively and quantitatively evaluated for sustained combustion, combustion propagation, inflation profile of an associated airbag, gas generating duration, inflator pressure across the length thereof, and other design criteria.
Preferred ranges for the percentage of the total aperture areas of each section of the propellant tube are as follows:
First 25% of Propellant Tube Length (Closest to the Initiator)—about 7–25%
Second 25% of Propellant Tube Length—about 13–25%
Third 25% of Propellant Tube Length—about 18–43%
Fourth 25% of Propellant Tube Length—25–54%
In view of the data given above, the present invention includes a propellant tube 22 having a plurality of gas exit apertures 40 wherein the area of each hole is calculated and a total open aperture area or sum is calculated by adding the gas exit aperture areas together. A first perforated section or portion of the propellant tube 22 is fixed closest to the igniter 26, wherein the first portion includes less than half of the total open aperture area. A second perforated section or portion of the propellant tube 22 is integral to and in coaxial relation with the first portion, wherein the second portion includes more than half of the total open aperture area. The first portion may include up to 75% of the total length of the propellant tube 22, for example. On the other hand, the second portion may include as little as 25% of the total length of the propellant tube 22, for example. It should be appreciated that in a preferred embodiment, the first half of the tube 22 will contain less than half of the total open aperture area, and the second half of the propellant tube 22 will contain more than half of the total open aperture area. As discussed above, the respective first and second gas exit aperture areas of either the first or second sections may be tailored by the number and size of respective gas exit apertures included in either section.
Accordingly, consistent with the table given above, the present invention may also be characterized as an elongated inflator 10 comprising a plurality of collinear and integral sections that together constitute a single perforated tube 22. As such, in this embodiment, a first section nearest to an associated igniter, a second section juxtaposed to the first section, a third section juxtaposed to the second section, and a fourth section farthest from the igniter and juxtaposed to the third section constitute the propellant tube internal to the inflator. More generally, the present invention includes an elongated inflator 10 that contains an elongated propellant tube 22 substantially coextensive therewith. A first end 22a of the propellant tube 22 is fixed to an associated igniter 26. A second end 22b of the propellant tube 22 is preferably capped to seal off the flow of combustion gases upon inflator 10 activation. A plurality of gas exit orifices 40 is formed within the propellant tube 22 from the first end to the second end. As supported in the table shown above relative to overall open aperture area, the number of apertures per unit length of enclosure 22 and the aperture area per unit length of the enclosure increases with each successive group of apertures along the enclosure, proceeding from the first end of the enclosure to the second end of the enclosure
It is noted that the stacking of substantially uniform gas generant tablets 24 adjacent each other along enclosure 22 provides for a relatively constant average density of gas generant along the enclosure. Also, the use of an enclosure having a substantially constant cross-sectional area along the length of the enclosure provides for a substantially constant volume per unit length of the enclosure. These features aid in minimizing pressure variations within the enclosure due to such factors as variations in enclosure volume, and localized hot spots and higher pressure regions resulting from disparities in gas generant distribution along the enclosure. The dome-shaped faces of each propellant tablet further facilitates an ease of assembly in that each dome-shaped face provides a pivot point at its apex that physically communicates with the apex of an adjacent tablet's propellant face. Accordingly, by virtue of the pivot point created on each dome-shaped face, the same juxtaposed orientation of each propellant tablet is assured without undue complication.
In addition, it may be seen (particularly from,
Referring now to
It should be understood that the preceding is merely a detailed description of one embodiment of this invention and that numerous changes to the disclosed embodiment can be made in accordance with the disclosure herein without departing from the spirit or scope of the invention. The preceding description, therefore, is not meant to limit the scope of the invention. Rather, the scope of the invention is to be determined only by the appended claims and their equivalents.
This application claims the benefit of provisional application Ser. No. 60/536,134 filed on Jan. 13, 2004.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3397639 | Alderfer | Aug 1968 | A |
3606377 | Martin | Sep 1971 | A |
3721456 | McDonald | Mar 1973 | A |
3733088 | Stephenson | May 1973 | A |
3799573 | McDonald | Mar 1974 | A |
3897961 | Leising et al. | Aug 1975 | A |
3904221 | Shiki et al. | Sep 1975 | A |
3929074 | San Miguel | Dec 1975 | A |
3986808 | Keith | Oct 1976 | A |
4005876 | Jorgensen et al. | Feb 1977 | A |
4012211 | Goetz | Mar 1977 | A |
4200615 | Hamilton et al. | Apr 1980 | A |
4322385 | Goetz et al. | Mar 1982 | A |
4358998 | Schneiter et al. | Nov 1982 | A |
4817828 | Goetz | Apr 1989 | A |
4846368 | Goetz | Jul 1989 | A |
4878690 | Cunningham | Nov 1989 | A |
4890860 | Schneiter | Jan 1990 | A |
4950458 | Cunningham | Aug 1990 | A |
5094475 | Olsson et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5109772 | Cunningham et al. | May 1992 | A |
5139588 | Poole | Aug 1992 | A |
5308370 | Kraft et al. | May 1994 | A |
5322322 | Bark et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5397544 | Kobari et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5409259 | Cunningham et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5439250 | Kokeguchi et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5443286 | Cunningham et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5462308 | Seki et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5464249 | Lauritzen et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5503079 | Kishi et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5540154 | Wilcox et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5540459 | Daniel | Jul 1996 | A |
5542704 | Hamilton et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5547638 | Rink et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5562303 | Schleicher et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5573271 | Headley | Nov 1996 | A |
5588672 | Karlow et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5623115 | Lauritzen et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5626360 | Lauritzen et al. | May 1997 | A |
5635665 | Kishi et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5743556 | Lindsay et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5752715 | Pripps et al. | May 1998 | A |
5826904 | Ellis et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5827996 | Yoshida et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5845933 | Walker et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5868424 | Hamilton et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5871228 | Lindsay et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5944343 | Vitek et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5967550 | Shirk et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
6019861 | Canterberry et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6029994 | Perotto et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6032979 | Mossi et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6039820 | Hinshaw et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6051158 | Taylor et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6056319 | Ruckdeschel et al. | May 2000 | A |
6062143 | Grace et al. | May 2000 | A |
6077371 | Lundstrom et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6142518 | Butt et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6145876 | Hamilton | Nov 2000 | A |
6170867 | Rink et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6176517 | Hamilton et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6177028 | Kanda et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6315847 | Lee et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6347566 | Rabotinsky et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6416599 | Yoshikawa et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6497429 | Matsumoto | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6595547 | Smith | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6601871 | Fischer | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6688231 | Herrmann | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6752421 | Khandhadia et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6755438 | Rink et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6805377 | Krupp et al. | Oct 2004 | B1 |
6846013 | Smith | Jan 2005 | B1 |
6880853 | Watase et al. | Apr 2005 | B1 |
20040084885 | Burns et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20050104349 | Stevens | May 2005 | A1 |
20050116454 | Stevens | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050200103 | Burns et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050218637 | Burns | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050218638 | Burns et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20060022444 | Khandhadia | Feb 2006 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
578478 | Jan 1994 | EP |
5-64015 | Aug 1993 | JP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20050151358 A1 | Jul 2005 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60536134 | Jan 2004 | US |