QR decomposition in an integrated circuit device

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 8812576
  • Patent Number
    8,812,576
  • Date Filed
    Monday, September 12, 2011
    13 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, August 19, 2014
    10 years ago
Abstract
Circuitry for performing QR decomposition of an input matrix includes multiplication/addition circuitry for performing multiplication and addition/subtraction operations on a plurality of inputs, division/square-root circuitry for performing division and square-root operations on an output of the multiplication/addition circuitry, a first memory for storing the input matrix, a second memory for storing a selected vector of the input matrix, and a selector for inputting to the multiplication/addition circuitry any one or more of a vector of the input matrix, the selected vector, and an output of the division/square-root circuitry. On respective successive passes, a respective vector of the input matrix is read from a first memory into a second memory, and elements of a respective vector of an R matrix of the QR decomposition are computed and the respective vector of the input matrix in the first memory is replaced with the respective vector of the R matrix.
Description
FIELD OF THE INVENTION

This invention relates to performing QR decomposition operations in integrated circuit devices.


BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

QR decomposition (also called a QR factorization) of a matrix is a decomposition of the matrix into an orthogonal matrix Q and a right triangular matrix R. QR decomposition may be used, for example, to solve the linear least squares problem. QR decomposition also is the basis for a particular eigenvalue algorithm called the QR algorithm


One known technique for performing QR decomposition is the modified Gram-Schmidt technique, which calculates the Q matrix as follows (where A is the input matrix, having columns ak and elements ajk):


for k=0:n−1

    • r(k,k)=norm(A(1:m, k));
    • for j=k+1:n−1
      • r(k, j)=dot(A(1:m, k), A(1:m, j))/r(k,k);
    • end
    • q(1:m, k)=A(1:m, k)/r(k,k);
    • for j=k+1:n−1
      • A(1:m, j)=A(1:m, j)−r(k, j)·q(1:m, k);
    • end


end


As can be seen, there are two data dependencies. First, neither the r(k, j) nor the q(1:m, k) terms can be computed until r(k,k) has been computed. And while r(k,k) is nominally computed first, floating point functions may have long latencies. Second, the A(1:m, j) terms cannot be computed until the r(k, j) and q(1:m, k) terms have been computed. These dependencies may introduce stalls in the data flow.


Such data dependencies can cause delays when the computation is performed in hardware, and also may be of concern in a software implementation in a multicore processor environment, or even in a single core processor environment if the processor is deeply pipelined and the pipeline is optimized for more functions more common than division.


Copending, commonly-assigned U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/703,146, filed Feb. 9, 2010, describes a modified Gram-Schmidt orthogonalization with no dependencies between iterations, but one internal dependency remains.


SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The present invention relates to circuitry for speeding up the QR decomposition of a matrix. The circuitry can be provided in a fixed logic device, or can be configured into a programmable integrated circuit device such as a programmable logic device (PLD).


In accordance with embodiments of the invention, there is provided circuitry for performing QR decomposition of an input matrix. The circuitry includes multiplication/addition circuitry for performing multiplication and addition/subtraction operations on a plurality of inputs, division/square-root circuitry for performing division and square-root operations on an output of the multiplication/addition circuitry, a first memory for storing the input matrix, a second memory for storing a selected vector of the input matrix, and a selector for inputting to the multiplication/addition circuitry any one or more of a vector of the input matrix, the selected vector, and an output of the division/square-root circuitry.


A method of performing QR decomposition of an input matrix using such circuitry is provided. The method includes on respective successive passes, reading a respective vector of the input matrix from a first memory into a second memory, and computing elements of a respective vector of an R matrix of the QR decomposition and replacing the respective vector of the input matrix in the first memory with the respective vector of the R matrix. After all vectors of the input matrix have been processed, the first memory contains an output matrix of the QR decomposition.


A machine-readable data storage medium encoded with software for performing a method of configuring such circuitry on a programmable device are also provided.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

Further features of the invention, its nature and various advantages will be apparent upon consideration of the following detailed description, taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, in which like reference characters refer to like parts throughout, and in which:



FIG. 1 shows one embodiment, according to the invention, of circuitry for QR decomposition;



FIG. 2 shows a first iteration through the circuitry of FIG. 1;



FIG. 3 shows another iteration through the circuitry of FIG. 1;



FIG. 4 shows another iteration through the circuitry of FIG. 1;



FIG. 5 shows another iteration through the circuitry of FIG. 1;



FIG. 6 shows another iteration through the circuitry of FIG. 1;



FIG. 7 illustrates memory usage according to one embodiment of a method according to the invention;



FIG. 8 illustrates memory usage according to another embodiment of a method according to the invention;



FIG. 9 is a cross-sectional view of a magnetic data storage medium encoded with a set of machine-executable instructions for performing the method according to the present invention;



FIG. 10 is a cross-sectional view of an optically readable data storage medium encoded with a set of machine executable instructions for performing the method according to the present invention; and



FIG. 11 is a simplified block diagram of an illustrative system employing a programmable logic device incorporating the present invention.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

Circuitry according to the invention implements the following modified Gram-Schmidt algorithm, where lines of the algorithm set forth above are reproduced and their substitutes, if any, are shown in italics, and the norm function is replaced with square-root and dot-product functions which are more readily available in hardware implementations:


for k=0:n−1

    • r(k,k)=sqrt(dot(A(1:m, k), A(1:m,k));
      • This can be rewritten as:
      • r2(k,k)=dot(A(1:m, k), A(1:m,k);
      • r(k,k)=sqrt(r2(k,k));
    • for j=k+1:n−1
      • r(k, j)=dot(A(1:m, k), A(1:m, j))/r(k,k);
        • This can be rewritten as:
        • rn(k, j)=dot(A(1:m, k), A(1:m, j));
        • r(k, j)=rn(k,j)/r(k,k);
    • end
    • q(1:m, k)=A(1:m, k)/r(k,k);
    • for j=k+1:n−1
      • A(1:m, j)=A(1:m, j)−r(k,j)−q(1:m,k);
    • end


end


The result is:


for k=0:n−1

    • r2(k,k)=dot(A(1:m, k), A(1:m,k);
    • r(k,k)=sqrt(r2(k,k));
    • for j=k+1:n−1
      • rn(k, j)=dot(A(1:m, k), A(1:m, j));
      • r(k, j)=m(k,j)/r(k,k);
    • end
    • q(1:m, k)=A(1:m, k)/r(k,k);
    • for j=k+1:n<1
      • A(1:m, j)=A(1:m, j)−r(k,j)·q(1:m,k);
    • end


end


In the expression for A(1:m, j), replacing q(1:m,k) with A(1:m,k)/r(k,k) and r(k,j) with rn(k,j)/r(k,k) yields:


for k=0:n−1

    • r2(k,k)=dot(A(1:m, k), A(1:m,k);
    • r(k,k)=sqrt(r2(k,k));
    • for j=k+1:n−1
      • rn(k, j)=dot(A(1:m, k), A(1:m, j));
      • r(k, j)=m(k,j)/r(k,k);
    • end
    • q(1:m, k)=A(1:m, k)/r(k,k);
    • for j=k+1:n−1
    • A(1:m, j)=A(1:m, j)−rn(k,j)/r(k,k)·A(1:m,k)/r(k,k);
    • end


end


Reordering further yields:


for k=0:n−1

    • r2(k,k)=dot(A(1:m, k), A(1:m,k);
    • for j=k+1:n−1
      • rn(k, j)=dot(A(1:m, k), A(1:m, j));
    • end
    • for j=k+1:n−1
      • A(1:m, j)=A(1:m, j)−(rn(k,j)/r2(k,k))·A(1:m,k);
    • end


end


for k=0:n−1

    • r(k,k)=sqrt(r2(k,k));
    • for j=k+1:n−1
      • r(k,j)=rn(k,j)/r(k,k);
    • end
    • q(1:m, k)=A(1:m, k)/r(k,k);


end


The original algorithm required k square-root operations, k2/2+k division operations, (k·m)+mk2/2 addition operations, m·(k+k2) complex multiplication operations, and mk2/2 subtraction operations. Counting additions and subtractions together, there were k square-root operations and k2/2+k division operations, m·(k+k2) addition/subtraction operations and m·(k+k2) complex multiplication operations.


In the reordered algorithm, there are no square-root operations in the computations of the r2(k,k), rn(k,j) and A(1:m, j) values, with fewer overall operations in the computations of the A(1:m, j) values. Moreover, all multiplications are eliminated from the calculations of the r(k,k), r(k,j) and q(1:m, k) values. As a result, there are, in total, k square-root operations, m·(k+k2) addition/subtraction operations and m·(k+k2) complex multiplication operations, and k2+k division operations. Although there are more total division operations, there is still only one division operation per m complex multiplications, and the data dependencies are removed, as discussed. Moreover, removal of the square-root operations in the computations of the A values improves the precision of the results.


A circuit implementation 100 for QR decomposition according to an embodiment of the present invention is shown in FIG. 1.


Circuit 100 includes an input matrix store 101, a column vector store 102, a multiplexer 103, a multiplication/addition unit 104, a division/square root unit 105, and a feedback FIFO 106. Multiplexer 103 is controlled by control unit 113 to provide the appropriate inputs to multiplication/addition unit 104.


If circuit 100 is implemented in a programmable logic device, multiplication/addition unit 104 could be a specialized processing block of that programmable logic device, such as a digital signal processing (DSP) block of the type provided in the STRATIX® family of field-programmable gate arrays available from Altera Corporation, of San Jose, Calif., which avoids the need to configure multipliers and adders in programmable logic of the programmable logic device.


Division/square root unit 105 could include an inverse square root unit, which is more easily implemented in hardware. The square root, SQRT(a), of a number a may then be calculated as the number a multiplied by the inverse of its square root—i.e., SQRT(a)=a·(1/SQRT(a)). Similarly, to divide two numbers, a/b, one can use the inverse square root unit to calculate 1/SQRT(b) and then multiply that result by itself to generate 1/SQRT(b)·1/SQRT(b)=1/b, which can then be multiplied by a to yield a·1/b=a/b, providing a quotient using only multipliers and the inverse square root unit. If circuit 100 is implemented in a programmable logic device, division/square root unit 105 could be a specialized processing block of that programmable logic device, or a portion of such a block of the programmable logic device.


Because of the nature of the computations, each column of the input matrix is used once and then not needed again. Therefore, if only the R matrix is needed, a separate result memory is not needed; the columns of the input matrix can be replaced by the columns of the result matrix in input matrix store 101 as they are calculated. If the Q matrix also is needed, it may be computed from the R matrix, but then an additional memory may be needed to store results. However, because of the triangular nature of the R matrix, it only occupies half as much memory as the input A matrix or the Q matrix. Therefore, the additional memory need only be half the size of input matrix store 101. In addition, column vector store 102 is provided to hold each column as it is needed, as discussed below.


Control unit 113 controls multiplexer 103 to select the inputs to multiplication/addition unit 104 according to the operation to be performed, in accordance with the following table, where, among the functions or instructions, “mag” indicates the magnitude or norm function, “dot” indicates the dot product function, “div” indicates division and “sub” indicates subtraction, and among the variables, “A” indicates the input matrix, and Ak indicates the kth column of the A matrix (as stored in column vector store 102):


















Instruction
Input1
Input2
Input3









mag
A
A




dot
A
Ak




div

Ak
1/rk, k



sub
A
Ak
rk, j/r2k, k










Multiplexer 103 can direct a single input to more than one input of multiplication/addition unit 104. Thus, in each kth outer loop, the norm (“mag”) is computed first, with multiplexer 103 selecting the kth column of matrix A from input matrix store 101 and directing it to two inputs of multiplication/addition unit 104. For the dot product in the first inner loop of each iteration of the first outer loop, multiplexer 103 selects the kth column from column vector store 102, as well as the respective jth columns of matrix A from input matrix store 101 as two inputs of multiplication/addition unit 104. For the division in the inner loop of each iteration of the second outer loop, multiplexer 103 selects the kth column from column vector store 102, as well as 1/rk,k fed back through FIFO 106 from division/square root unit 105. For the subtraction in the second inner loop of each iteration of the first outer loop, multiplexer 103 selects the respective jth columns of matrix A from input matrix store 101, the kth column from column vector store 102, and rk,j/r2k,k fed back through FIFO 106 from division/square root unit 105.


FIFO 106 stores the current feedback value until it is needed. Feedback values are generated in the correct order, so no reordering is necessary. When the FIFO is empty and a new value is required, the forward path will stall until a feedback value is available.


The computation of r(k,j),rn(k,j)/r(k,k) in the inner loop of the second outer loop is calculated by the division/square root unit 105, which gets its input directly from the output of multiplication/addition unit 104.


The arrangement and timing of these operations preferably is such that multiplication/addition unit 104, which consumes m complex multipliers for every divider in the division/square root unit 105 and therefore consumes the most resources, is kept busy substantially continuously.


Because the resulting R matrix is an upper triangular matrix, after each kth iteration of the outer loop, the kth column of the input matrix A is no longer needed. Accordingly, as discussed above, input matrix store 101 can be used for the output matrix R as well, avoiding the need for a separate output memory. The feedback of the output 115 to input matrix store 101 is not shown explicitly but may be provided in the larger circuit of which QR implementation circuit 100 is a part. In a programmable integrated circuit device, that feedback may be accomplished using dedicated circuitry or using the programmable interconnect resources of the device.


As further noted above, if the Q matrix is to be computed from the R matrix, additional storage will be required. However, because R is a triangular matrix, it consumes only half of input matrix store 101. Therefore, ins such case the Q matrix can be stored in input matrix store 101, and while additional memory would be needed to store the R matrix, but that additional memory could be only about half the size of input matrix store 101.


An example of a portion of a QR decomposition of a 3×3 matrix A, using embodiments of methods and circuits according to the present invention, is shown in FIGS. 2-6.



FIG. 2 shows the use of circuit 100 to perform the first line of the first iteration of the first outer loop, which is part of the computation of the norm of matrix A. The three columns A0, A1 and A2 of matrix A have been loaded into input matrix store 101, and the first column A0 has been loaded into column vector store 102. As indicated at 201, multiplexer 103, directed by control unit 113, selects column A0 from input matrix store 101 and provides it as two inputs 221, 231 to multiplication/addition unit 104. Multiplication/addition unit 104 computes r20,0, at 202. Division/square root unit 105 operates on input 202 to compute r0,0, at 203.


As seen in FIG. 3, r0,0 has been routed back to input matrix store 101 and stored as an element of the column that originally stored column A0. This routing may be accomplished using a dedicated connection (not shown) or, in a programmable logic device, using programmable interconnect resources of the device. Column A0 can be overwritten because it has been stored in column vector store 102 for any further calculations for which it may be needed.


As also seen in FIG. 3, multiplexer 103, directed by control unit 113, selects column A1 from input matrix store 101 and column A0 from column vector store 102, and provides them as two inputs 321, 331, respectively, to multiplication/addition unit 104. Multiplication/addition unit 104 computes rn0,1, at 302. Division/square root unit 105 operates on input 302 to compute r0,1, at 303 (dividing by r20,0, previously calculated).


As seen in FIG. 4, r0,1 has been routed back to input matrix store 101 and stored as an element of the column that originally stored column A0. As in the case of r0,0, this routing may be accomplished using a dedicated connection (not shown) or, in a programmable logic device, using programmable interconnect resources of the device.


As also seen in FIG. 4, multiplexer 103, directed by control unit 113, selects column A2 from input matrix store 101 and column A0 from column vector store 102, and provides them as two inputs 421, 431, respectively, to multiplication/addition unit 104. Multiplication/addition unit 104 computes rn0,2, at 402. Division/square root unit 105 operates on input 402 to compute r0,2, at 403 (dividing by r20,0, previously calculated). r0,2 may be fed back to input matrix store 101, completing Column R in this 3×3 example.


As seen above, within the outer loop—i.e., before the next k—if Q is needed, Qk—in this case, Q0—is computed by dividing Ak (in this case, A0) by rk,k (in this case, r0,0). Thus, as shown in FIG. 5, multiplexer 103, directed by control unit 113, selects column A0 from column vector store 102, and 1/r0,0 fed back from division/square root unit 105 through FIFO 106, and provides them as two inputs 521, 531, respectively, to multiplication/addition unit 104. Multiplication/addition unit 104 multiplies those inputs to compute Q0, at 502, which is passed through division/square root unit 105 (divided by 1) and output at 503.


As also seen above, within the outer loop (index k) the next column of the input matrix A is modified by an inner loop (index j) as follows:

A(1:m,j)=A(1:m,j)−(rn(k,j)/r2(k,k))·A(1:m,k)

An embodiment of this operation is shown in FIG. 6 for the k=0; j=1 iteration. As seen in FIG. 6, multiplexer 103, directed by control unit 113, selects column A1 from input matrix store 101 and column A0 from column vector store 102, and provides them as two of the three inputs to multiplication/addition unit 104. As a third input, multiplexer 103, directed by control unit 113, selects rn0,1/r20,0, fed back from division/square root unit 105 through FIFO 106. From those three inputs, multiplication/addition unit 104 computes an updated column vector A1′ at 602, which is fed back via feedback path 601 to input matrix store 101 and replaces original column A1. In another iteration (not shown), the same process is used to replace original column A2 with a new column A2′. If there were more columns than are shown in this example, the subsequent columns would also be replaced. In a next iteration of the outer loop, this inner loop would result in the replacement of A2′ with A2″ (as well, in an example with more than three columns, as any additional “prime” columns of higher index with “double prime” columns). In yet another iteration of the outer loop in a case with more columns, this inner loop would result in the replacement of A3″ with A3′″ (and any additional “double prime” columns of higher index with “triple prime” columns). The next iteration of the outer loop would result in the replacement of A4′″ with A4″″, and so on. Of course, on each such iteration of the outer loop, the other computations described above would also be carried out.


In this embodiment, the just-described replacement of the columns of the input matrix is the last step in the outer loop. The next iteration of the outer loop would begin with the computation of the norm of the next columns of the modified input matrix A′, replacing column A1′ column with column R1, including, in this 3×3 example, individual values r1,1 and r1,2. The various inner loops would then be carried out as above. The next iteration of the outer loop would begin with the computation of the norm of the next columns of the modified input matrix A″, replacing column A2″ column with column R2, including, in this 3×3 example, individual value r2,2. The various inner loops would then be carried out again as above, which would be the final iteration in this 3×3 example. At that point R, and Q if needed, would have been calculated. It will be apparent, however, how embodiments of the invention can be used with larger matrices.



FIGS. 7 and 8 show the efficiency of memory usage according to the invention, using the foregoing 3×3 example as an illustration. FIG. 7 shows the case where the R matrix is computed but the Q matrix is not needed, while FIG. 8 shows the case where both R and Q matrices are computed. Thus, as seen at 701 in FIG. 7, input matrix store 101 includes the three columns (shown row-wise for ease of illustration) of input matrix A. As seen at 702, after the first outer loop, input matrix store 101 includes column R0 of output matrix R, along with modified columns A1′ and A2′ of input matrix A. As seen at 703, after the second outer loop, input matrix store 101 includes columns R0 and R1 of output matrix R, along with modified column A2″ of input matrix A. As seen at 704, after the third outer loop, input matrix store 101 includes all three columns R0, R1 and R2 of output matrix R. By adding column vector store 102 in circuit 100, the need for a separate output memory for matrix R has been eliminated.


As seen at 851 in FIG. 8, input matrix store 101 again includes the three columns (shown row-wise for ease of illustration) of input matrix A. As seen at 852, after the first outer loop, input matrix store 101 includes column Q0 of output matrix Q, along with modified columns A1′ and A2′ of input matrix A. Column R0 has been moved into output memory 850. As seen at 853, after the second outer loop, input matrix store 101 includes columns Q0 and Q1 of output matrix Q, along with modified column A2″ of input matrix A. Column R1 has been moved into output memory 850 along with column R0. As seen at 854, after the third outer loop, input matrix store 101 includes all three columns Q0, Q1 and Q2 of output matrix Q. In this case, the addition of column vector store 102 in circuit 100 has not eliminated the need for a separate output memory, but by using input matrix store 101 for the larger output matrix Q, the additional memory 850 need only be as large as the smaller matrix R, which is essentially half the size of either input matrix A or output matrix Q.


Thus it is seen that circuitry and methods for performing QR decomposition with reduced data dependencies, and reduced memory requirements, has been provided. This invention may have use in hard-wired implementations of QR decompositions, as well as in software implementations in multi-core processors where data dependencies across processor cores may be a factor.


Another potential use for the present invention may be in programmable integrated circuit devices such as programmable logic devices, as discussed above, where programming software can be provided to allow users to configure a programmable device to perform matrix operations. The result would be that fewer logic resources of the programmable device would be consumed. And where the programmable device is provided with a certain number of dedicated blocks for arithmetic functions (to spare the user from having to configure arithmetic functions from general-purpose logic), the number of dedicated blocks needed to be provided (which may be provided at the expense of additional general-purpose logic) can be reduced (or sufficient dedicated blocks for more operations, without further reducing the amount of general-purpose logic, can be provided).


The calculations described above may be done as fixed-point calculations or floating-point calculations. If floating point calculations are used, the various operators used for the calculations described above can be configured in a programmable device using, e.g., the techniques described in commonly-assigned U.S. Pat. No. 7,865,541, which is hereby incorporated by reference herein in its entirety, which conserves resources by limiting the normalization of intermediate results, as described therein.


Instructions for carrying out a method according to this invention for programming a programmable device to perform matrix decomposition may be encoded on a machine-readable medium, to be executed by a suitable computer or similar device to implement the method of the invention for programming or configuring PLDs or other programmable devices to perform addition and subtraction operations as described above. For example, a personal computer may be equipped with an interface to which a PLD can be connected, and the personal computer can be used by a user to program the PLD using a suitable software tool, such as the QUARTUS® II software available from Altera Corporation, of San Jose, Calif.



FIG. 9 presents a cross section of a magnetic data storage medium 800 which can be encoded with a machine executable program that can be carried out by systems such as the aforementioned personal computer, or other computer or similar device. Medium 800 can be a floppy diskette or hard disk, or magnetic tape, having a suitable substrate 801, which may be conventional, and a suitable coating 802, which may be conventional, on one or both sides, containing magnetic domains (not visible) whose polarity or orientation can be altered magnetically. Except in the case where it is magnetic tape, medium 800 may also have an opening (not shown) for receiving the spindle of a disk drive or other data storage device.


The magnetic domains of coating 802 of medium 800 are polarized or oriented so as to encode, in manner which may be conventional, a machine-executable program, for execution by a programming system such as a personal computer or other computer or similar system, having a socket or peripheral attachment into which the PLD to be programmed may be inserted, to configure appropriate portions of the PLD, including its specialized processing blocks, if any, in accordance with the invention.



FIG. 10 shows a cross section of an optically-readable data storage medium 810 which also can be encoded with such a machine-executable program, which can be carried out by systems such as the aforementioned personal computer, or other computer or similar device. Medium 810 can be a conventional compact disk read-only memory (CD-ROM) or digital video disk read-only memory (DVD-ROM) or a rewriteable medium such as a CD-R, CD-RW, DVD-R, DVD-RW, DVD+R, DVD+RW, or DVD-RAM or a magneto-optical disk which is optically readable and magneto-optically rewriteable. Medium 810 preferably has a suitable substrate 811, which may be conventional, and a suitable coating 812, which may be conventional, usually on one or both sides of substrate 811.


In the case of a CD-based or DVD-based medium, as is well known, coating 812 is reflective and is impressed with a plurality of pits 813, arranged on one or more layers, to encode the machine-executable program. The arrangement of pits is read by reflecting laser light off the surface of coating 812. A protective coating 814, which preferably is substantially transparent, is provided on top of coating 812.


In the case of magneto-optical disk, as is well known, coating 812 has no pits 813, but has a plurality of magnetic domains whose polarity or orientation can be changed magnetically when heated above a certain temperature, as by a laser (not shown). The orientation of the domains can be read by measuring the polarization of laser light reflected from coating 812. The arrangement of the domains encodes the program as described above.


A PLD 90 programmed according to the present invention may be used in many kinds of electronic devices. One possible use is in a data processing system 900 shown in FIG. 11. Data processing system 900 may include one or more of the following components: a processor 901; memory 902; I/O circuitry 903; and peripheral devices 904. These components are coupled together by a system bus 905 and are populated on a circuit board 906 which is contained in an end-user system 907.


System 900 can be used in a wide variety of applications, such as computer networking, data networking, instrumentation, video processing, digital signal processing, or any other application where the advantage of using programmable or reprogrammable logic is desirable. PLD 90 can be used to perform a variety of different logic functions. For example, PLD 90 can be configured as a processor or controller that works in cooperation with processor 901. PLD 90 may also be used as an arbiter for arbitrating access to a shared resources in system 900. In yet another example, PLD 90 can be configured as an interface between processor 901 and one of the other components in system 900. It should be noted that system 900 is only exemplary, and that the true scope and spirit of the invention should be indicated by the following claims.


Various technologies can be used to implement PLDs 90 as described above and incorporating this invention.


It will be understood that the foregoing is only illustrative of the principles of the invention, and that various modifications can be made by those skilled in the art without departing from the scope and spirit of the invention. For example, the various elements of this invention can be provided on a PLD in any desired number and/or arrangement. One skilled in the art will appreciate that the present invention can be practiced by other than the described embodiments, which are presented for purposes of illustration and not of limitation, and the present invention is limited only by the claims that follow.

Claims
  • 1. Matrix processing circuitry for performing QR decomposition of an input matrix, said matrix processing circuitry comprising: multiplication/addition circuitry for performing multiplication and addition/subtraction operations on a plurality of inputs;division/square-root circuitry for performing division and square-root operations on an output of said multiplication/addition circuitry;a first memory for storing said input matrix;a second memory for storing a selected vector of said input matrix; anda selector for inputting to said multiplication/addition circuitry any one or more of a vector of said input matrix, said selected vector, and an output of said division/square-root circuitry; wherein:on respective successive passes:a respective vector of said input matrix is read from said first memory into said second memory, andsaid matrix processing circuitry computes elements of a respective vector of an R matrix of said QR decomposition and replaces said respective vector of said input matrix in said first memory with said respective vector of said R matrix; andafter all vectors of said input matrix have been processed, said first memory contains an output matrix of said QR decomposition.
  • 2. The matrix processing circuitry of claim 1 further comprising control circuitry controlling which one or more of said vector of said input matrix, said selected vector, and said output of said division/square-root circuitry, are input to said multiplication/addition circuitry.
  • 3. The matrix processing circuitry of claim 1 further comprising a feedback memory for storing said output of said division/square-root circuitry for input to said selector.
  • 4. The matrix processing circuitry of claim 3 wherein said feedback memory is a FIFO memory.
  • 5. The matrix processing circuitry of claim 1 wherein said output matrix contained in said first memory is said R matrix.
  • 6. The matrix processing circuitry of claim 1 further comprising: an output memory; wherein:said R matrix is stored in said output memory; andsaid output matrix contained in said first memory is a Q matrix of said QR decomposition.
  • 7. A method of performing QR decomposition of an input matrix using an integrated circuit device, said method comprising: on respective successive passes:reading a respective vector of said input matrix from a first memory into a second memory; andcomputing elements of a respective vector of an R matrix of said QR decomposition and replacing said respective vector of said input matrix in said first memory with said respective vector of said R matrix; wherein:after all vectors of said input matrix have been processed, said first memory contains an output matrix of said QR decomposition.
  • 8. The method of claim 7 wherein said output matrix contained in said first memory is said R matrix.
  • 9. The method of claim 7 further comprising: outputting said R matrix to an output memory; wherein:said output matrix contained in said first memory is a Q matrix of said QR decomposition.
  • 10. A method of configuring a programmable integrated circuit device as circuitry for performing QR decomposition of an input matrix, said method comprising: configuring logic of said programmable integrated circuit device as multiplication/addition circuitry for performing multiplication and addition/subtraction operations on a plurality of inputs;configuring logic of said programmable integrated circuit device as division/square-root circuitry for performing division and square-root operations on an output of said multiplication/addition circuitry;configuring memory on said programmable integrated circuit device as a first memory for storing said input matrix;configuring memory on said programmable integrated circuit device as a second memory for storing a selected vector of said input matrix;configuring logic of said programmable integrated circuit device as a selector for inputting to said multiplication/addition circuitry any one or more of a vector of said input matrix, said selected vector, and an output of said division/square-root circuitry; andconfiguring said circuitry for performing QR decomposition of an input matrix to, on respective successive passes:read a respective vector of said input matrix from said first memory into said second memory, andcompute elements of a respective vector of an R matrix of said QR decomposition and replace said respective vector of said input matrix in said first memory with said respective vector of said R matrix; wherein:after all vectors of said input matrix have been processed, said first memory contains an output matrix of said QR decomposition.
  • 11. The method of claim 10 further comprising: configuring logic of said programmable integrated circuit device as control circuitry controlling which one or more of said vector of said input matrix, said selected vector, and said output of said division/square-root circuitry, are input to said multiplication/addition circuitry.
  • 12. The method of claim 10 further comprising: configuring memory of said programmable integrated circuit device as a feedback memory for storing said output of said division/square-root circuitry for input to said selector.
  • 13. The method of claim 12 comprising configuring said feedback memory as a FIFO memory.
  • 14. The method of claim 10 wherein said output matrix contained in said first memory is said R matrix.
  • 15. The method of claim 10 wherein: said R matrix is stored in an output memory; andsaid output matrix contained in said first memory is a Q matrix of said QR decomposition.
  • 16. A non-transitory machine-readable data storage medium encoded with non-transitory machine-executable instructions for configuring a programmable integrated circuit device as circuitry for performing QR decomposition of an input matrix, said instructions comprising: instructions to configure logic of said programmable integrated circuit device as multiplication/addition circuitry for performing multiplication and addition/subtraction operations on a plurality of inputs;instructions to configure logic of said programmable integrated circuit device as division/square-root circuitry for performing division and square-root operations on an output of said multiplication/addition circuitry;instructions to configure memory of said programmable integrated circuit device as a first memory for storing said input matrix;instructions to configure memory of said programmable integrated circuit device as a second memory for storing a selected vector of said input matrix;instructions to configure logic of said programmable integrated circuit device as a selector for inputting to said multiplication/addition circuitry any one or more of a vector of said input matrix, said selected vector, and an output of said division/square-root circuitry; andinstructions to configure logic of said programmable integrated circuit device to, on respective successive passes:read a respective vector of said input matrix from said first memory into said second memory, andcompute elements of a respective vector of an R matrix of said QR decomposition and replace said respective vector of said input matrix in said first memory with said respective vector of said R matrix; wherein:after all vectors of said input matrix have been processed, said first memory contains an output matrix of said QR decomposition.
  • 17. The non-transitory machine-readable data storage medium of claim 16 further comprising: instructions to configure logic of said programmable integrated circuit device as control circuitry controlling which one or more of said vector of said input matrix, said selected vector, and said output of said division/square-root circuitry, are input to said multiplication/addition circuitry.
  • 18. The non-transitory machine-readable data storage medium of claim 16 further comprising instructions to configure memory of said programmable integrated circuit device as a feedback memory for storing said output of said division/square-root circuitry for input to said selector.
  • 19. The non-transitory machine-readable data storage medium of claim 16 further comprising instructions to store said R matrix as said output matrix contained in said first memory.
  • 20. The non-transitory machine-readable data storage medium of claim 16 further comprising: instructions to configure memory of said programmable logic device as an output memory for storing said R matrix; andinstructions to store a Q matrix of said QR decomposition said output matrix contained in said first memory.
US Referenced Citations (345)
Number Name Date Kind
3473160 Wahlstrom Oct 1969 A
4156927 McElroy et al. May 1979 A
4179746 Tubbs Dec 1979 A
4212076 Conners Jul 1980 A
4215406 Gomola et al. Jul 1980 A
4215407 Gomola et al. Jul 1980 A
4422155 Amir et al. Dec 1983 A
4484259 Palmer et al. Nov 1984 A
4521907 Amir et al. Jun 1985 A
4575812 Kloker et al. Mar 1986 A
4597053 Chamberlin Jun 1986 A
4616330 Betz Oct 1986 A
4623961 Mackiewicz Nov 1986 A
4682302 Williams Jul 1987 A
4718057 Venkitakrishnan et al. Jan 1988 A
4727508 Williams Feb 1988 A
4736335 Barkan Apr 1988 A
4777614 Ward Oct 1988 A
4791590 Ku et al. Dec 1988 A
4799004 Mori Jan 1989 A
4823295 Mader Apr 1989 A
4839847 Laprade Jun 1989 A
4871930 Wong et al. Oct 1989 A
4912345 Steele et al. Mar 1990 A
4918637 Morton Apr 1990 A
4967160 Quievy et al. Oct 1990 A
4982354 Takeuchi et al. Jan 1991 A
4991010 Hailey et al. Feb 1991 A
4994997 Martin et al. Feb 1991 A
5073863 Zhang Dec 1991 A
5081604 Tanaka Jan 1992 A
5122685 Chan et al. Jun 1992 A
5128559 Steele Jul 1992 A
5175702 Beraud et al. Dec 1992 A
5208491 Ebeling et al. May 1993 A
RE34363 Freeman Aug 1993 E
5267187 Hsieh et al. Nov 1993 A
5296759 Sutherland et al. Mar 1994 A
5338983 Agarwala Aug 1994 A
5339263 White Aug 1994 A
5349250 New Sep 1994 A
5357152 Jennings, III et al. Oct 1994 A
5371422 Patel et al. Dec 1994 A
5375079 Uramoto et al. Dec 1994 A
5381357 Wedgwood et al. Jan 1995 A
5404324 Colon-Benet Apr 1995 A
5424589 Dobbelaere et al. Jun 1995 A
5446651 Moyse et al. Aug 1995 A
5451948 Jekel Sep 1995 A
5452231 Butts et al. Sep 1995 A
5452375 Rousseau et al. Sep 1995 A
5457644 McCollum Oct 1995 A
5465226 Goto Nov 1995 A
5465375 Thepaut et al. Nov 1995 A
5483178 Costello et al. Jan 1996 A
5497498 Taylor Mar 1996 A
5500812 Saishi et al. Mar 1996 A
5500828 Doddington et al. Mar 1996 A
5523963 Hsieh et al. Jun 1996 A
5528550 Pawate et al. Jun 1996 A
5537601 Kimura et al. Jul 1996 A
5541864 Van Bavel et al. Jul 1996 A
5546018 New et al. Aug 1996 A
5550993 Ehlig et al. Aug 1996 A
5559450 Ngai et al. Sep 1996 A
5563526 Hastings et al. Oct 1996 A
5563819 Nelson Oct 1996 A
5570039 Oswald et al. Oct 1996 A
5570040 Lytle et al. Oct 1996 A
5572148 Lytle et al. Nov 1996 A
5581501 Sansbury et al. Dec 1996 A
5590350 Guttag et al. Dec 1996 A
5594366 Khong et al. Jan 1997 A
5594912 Brueckmann et al. Jan 1997 A
5596763 Guttag et al. Jan 1997 A
5606266 Pedersen Feb 1997 A
5617058 Adrian et al. Apr 1997 A
5631848 Laczko et al. May 1997 A
5633601 Nagaraj May 1997 A
5636150 Okamoto Jun 1997 A
5636368 Harrison et al. Jun 1997 A
5640578 Balmer et al. Jun 1997 A
5644519 Yatim et al. Jul 1997 A
5644522 Moyse et al. Jul 1997 A
5646545 Trimberger et al. Jul 1997 A
5646875 Taborn et al. Jul 1997 A
5648732 Duncan Jul 1997 A
5652903 Weng et al. Jul 1997 A
5655069 Ogawara et al. Aug 1997 A
5664192 Lloyd et al. Sep 1997 A
5689195 Cliff et al. Nov 1997 A
5696708 Leung Dec 1997 A
5729495 Madurawe Mar 1998 A
5740404 Baji Apr 1998 A
5744980 McGowan et al. Apr 1998 A
5744991 Jefferson et al. Apr 1998 A
5754459 Telikepalli May 1998 A
5761483 Trimberger Jun 1998 A
5764555 McPherson et al. Jun 1998 A
5768613 Asghar Jun 1998 A
5771186 Kodali et al. Jun 1998 A
5777912 Leung et al. Jul 1998 A
5784636 Rupp Jul 1998 A
5790446 Yu et al. Aug 1998 A
5794067 Kadowaki Aug 1998 A
5801546 Pierce et al. Sep 1998 A
5805477 Perner Sep 1998 A
5805913 Guttag et al. Sep 1998 A
5808926 Gorshtein et al. Sep 1998 A
5812479 Cliff et al. Sep 1998 A
5812562 Baeg Sep 1998 A
5815422 Dockser Sep 1998 A
5821776 McGowan Oct 1998 A
5825202 Tavana et al. Oct 1998 A
5838165 Chatter Nov 1998 A
5841684 Dockser Nov 1998 A
5847579 Trimberger Dec 1998 A
5847978 Ogura et al. Dec 1998 A
5847981 Kelley et al. Dec 1998 A
5859878 Phillips et al. Jan 1999 A
5869979 Bocchino Feb 1999 A
5872380 Rostoker et al. Feb 1999 A
5874834 New Feb 1999 A
5878250 LeBlanc Mar 1999 A
5880981 Kojima et al. Mar 1999 A
5892962 Cloutier Apr 1999 A
5894228 Reddy et al. Apr 1999 A
5898602 Rothman et al. Apr 1999 A
5931898 Khoury Aug 1999 A
5942914 Reddy et al. Aug 1999 A
5944774 Dent Aug 1999 A
5949710 Pass et al. Sep 1999 A
5951673 Miyata Sep 1999 A
5956265 Lewis Sep 1999 A
5959871 Pierzchala et al. Sep 1999 A
5960193 Guttag et al. Sep 1999 A
5961635 Guttag et al. Oct 1999 A
5963048 Harrison et al. Oct 1999 A
5963050 Young et al. Oct 1999 A
5968196 Ramamurthy et al. Oct 1999 A
5970254 Cooke et al. Oct 1999 A
5978260 Trimberger et al. Nov 1999 A
5982195 Cliff et al. Nov 1999 A
5986465 Mendel Nov 1999 A
5991788 Mintzer Nov 1999 A
5991898 Rajski et al. Nov 1999 A
5995748 Guttag et al. Nov 1999 A
5999015 Cliff et al. Dec 1999 A
5999990 Sharrit et al. Dec 1999 A
6005806 Madurawe et al. Dec 1999 A
6006321 Abbott Dec 1999 A
6009451 Burns Dec 1999 A
6018755 Gonikberg et al. Jan 2000 A
6020759 Heile Feb 2000 A
6021423 Nag et al. Feb 2000 A
6029187 Verbauwhede Feb 2000 A
6031763 Sansbury Feb 2000 A
6041339 Yu et al. Mar 2000 A
6041340 Mintzer Mar 2000 A
6052327 Reddy et al. Apr 2000 A
6052755 Terrill et al. Apr 2000 A
6055555 Boswell et al. Apr 2000 A
6064614 Khoury May 2000 A
6065131 Andrews et al. May 2000 A
6066960 Pedersen May 2000 A
6069487 Lane et al. May 2000 A
6072994 Phillips et al. Jun 2000 A
6073154 Dick Jun 2000 A
6075381 LaBerge Jun 2000 A
6084429 Trimberger Jul 2000 A
6085317 Smith Jul 2000 A
6091261 DeLange Jul 2000 A
6091765 Pietzold, III et al. Jul 2000 A
6094726 Gonion et al. Jul 2000 A
6097988 Tobias Aug 2000 A
6098163 Guttag et al. Aug 2000 A
6107820 Jefferson et al. Aug 2000 A
6107821 Kelem et al. Aug 2000 A
6107824 Reddy et al. Aug 2000 A
6130554 Kolze et al. Oct 2000 A
6140839 Kaviani et al. Oct 2000 A
6144980 Oberman Nov 2000 A
6154049 New Nov 2000 A
6157210 Zaveri et al. Dec 2000 A
6163788 Chen et al. Dec 2000 A
6167415 Fischer et al. Dec 2000 A
6175849 Smith Jan 2001 B1
6215326 Jefferson et al. Apr 2001 B1
6226735 Mirsky May 2001 B1
6242947 Trimberger Jun 2001 B1
6243729 Staszewski Jun 2001 B1
6246258 Lesea Jun 2001 B1
6260053 Maulik et al. Jul 2001 B1
6279021 Takano et al. Aug 2001 B1
6286024 Yano et al. Sep 2001 B1
6314442 Suzuki Nov 2001 B1
6314551 Borland Nov 2001 B1
6321246 Page et al. Nov 2001 B1
6323680 Pedersen et al. Nov 2001 B1
6327605 Arakawa et al. Dec 2001 B2
6351142 Abbott Feb 2002 B1
6353843 Chehrazi et al. Mar 2002 B1
6359468 Park et al. Mar 2002 B1
6360240 Takano et al. Mar 2002 B1
6362650 New et al. Mar 2002 B1
6366944 Hossain et al. Apr 2002 B1
6367003 Davis Apr 2002 B1
6369610 Cheung et al. Apr 2002 B1
6377970 Abdallah et al. Apr 2002 B1
6407576 Ngai et al. Jun 2002 B1
6407694 Cox et al. Jun 2002 B1
6427157 Webb Jul 2002 B1
6434587 Liao et al. Aug 2002 B1
6438569 Abbott Aug 2002 B1
6438570 Miller Aug 2002 B1
6446107 Knowles Sep 2002 B1
6453382 Heile Sep 2002 B1
6467017 Ngai et al. Oct 2002 B1
6480980 Koe Nov 2002 B2
6483343 Faith et al. Nov 2002 B1
6487575 Oberman Nov 2002 B1
6523055 Yu et al. Feb 2003 B1
6523057 Savo et al. Feb 2003 B1
6531888 Abbott Mar 2003 B2
6538470 Langhammer et al. Mar 2003 B1
6542000 Black et al. Apr 2003 B1
6556044 Langhammer et al. Apr 2003 B2
6557092 Callen Apr 2003 B1
6571268 Giacalone et al. May 2003 B1
6573749 New et al. Jun 2003 B2
6574762 Karimi et al. Jun 2003 B1
6591283 Conway et al. Jul 2003 B1
6591357 Mirsky Jul 2003 B2
6600495 Boland et al. Jul 2003 B1
6600788 Dick et al. Jul 2003 B1
6628140 Langhammer et al. Sep 2003 B2
6687722 Larsson et al. Feb 2004 B1
6692534 Wang et al. Feb 2004 B1
6700581 Baldwin et al. Mar 2004 B2
6725441 Keller et al. Apr 2004 B1
6728901 Rajski et al. Apr 2004 B1
6731133 Feng et al. May 2004 B1
6732134 Rosenberg et al. May 2004 B1
6744278 Liu et al. Jun 2004 B1
6745254 Boggs et al. Jun 2004 B2
6763367 Kwon et al. Jul 2004 B2
6771094 Langhammer et al. Aug 2004 B1
6774669 Liu et al. Aug 2004 B1
6781408 Langhammer Aug 2004 B1
6781410 Pani et al. Aug 2004 B2
6788104 Singh et al. Sep 2004 B2
6801924 Green et al. Oct 2004 B1
6836839 Master et al. Dec 2004 B2
6874079 Hogenauer Mar 2005 B2
6889238 Johnson May 2005 B2
6904471 Boggs et al. Jun 2005 B2
6924663 Masui et al. Aug 2005 B2
6963890 Dutta et al. Nov 2005 B2
6971083 Farrugia et al. Nov 2005 B1
6978287 Langhammer Dec 2005 B1
6983300 Ferroussat Jan 2006 B2
7020673 Ozawa Mar 2006 B2
7047272 Giacalone et al. May 2006 B2
7062526 Hoyle Jun 2006 B1
7093204 Oktem et al. Aug 2006 B2
7107305 Deng et al. Sep 2006 B2
7113969 Green et al. Sep 2006 B1
7181484 Stribaek et al. Feb 2007 B2
7200631 Mailaender et al. Apr 2007 B2
7313585 Winterrowd Dec 2007 B2
7395298 Debes et al. Jul 2008 B2
7401109 Koc et al. Jul 2008 B2
7409417 Lou Aug 2008 B2
7415542 Hennedy et al. Aug 2008 B2
7421465 Rarick et al. Sep 2008 B1
7428565 Fujimori Sep 2008 B2
7428566 Siu et al. Sep 2008 B2
7430578 Debes et al. Sep 2008 B2
7430656 Sperber et al. Sep 2008 B2
7447310 Koc et al. Nov 2008 B2
7472155 Simkins et al. Dec 2008 B2
7508936 Eberle et al. Mar 2009 B2
7536430 Guevokian et al. May 2009 B2
7567997 Simkins et al. Jul 2009 B2
7590676 Langhammer Sep 2009 B1
7646430 Brown Elliott et al. Jan 2010 B2
7668896 Lutz et al. Feb 2010 B2
7719446 Rosenthal et al. May 2010 B2
7769797 Cho et al. Aug 2010 B2
7814137 Mauer Oct 2010 B1
7822799 Langhammer et al. Oct 2010 B1
7836117 Langhammer et al. Nov 2010 B1
7865541 Langhammer Jan 2011 B1
7930335 Gura Apr 2011 B2
7930336 Langhammer Apr 2011 B2
7949699 Neoh et al. May 2011 B1
7974997 Arviv et al. Jul 2011 B2
8041759 Langhammer et al. Oct 2011 B1
8196012 Lau et al. Jun 2012 B2
8539016 Langhammer Sep 2013 B1
20010023425 Oberman et al. Sep 2001 A1
20010029515 Mirsky Oct 2001 A1
20010037352 Hong Nov 2001 A1
20020002573 Landers et al. Jan 2002 A1
20020038324 Page et al. Mar 2002 A1
20020049798 Wang et al. Apr 2002 A1
20020078114 Wang et al. Jun 2002 A1
20020089348 Langhammer Jul 2002 A1
20020116434 Nancekievill Aug 2002 A1
20030088757 Lindner et al. May 2003 A1
20040064770 Xin Apr 2004 A1
20040083412 Corbin et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040103133 Gurney May 2004 A1
20040122882 Zakharov et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040148321 Guevorkian et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040172439 Lin Sep 2004 A1
20040178818 Crotty et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040193981 Clark et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040267857 Abel et al. Dec 2004 A1
20040267863 Bhushan et al. Dec 2004 A1
20050038842 Stoye Feb 2005 A1
20050144212 Simkins et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050144215 Simkins et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050144216 Simkins et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050166038 Wang et al. Jul 2005 A1
20050187997 Zheng et al. Aug 2005 A1
20050187999 Zheng et al. Aug 2005 A1
20050262175 Iino et al. Nov 2005 A1
20060020655 Lin Jan 2006 A1
20070083585 St. Denis et al. Apr 2007 A1
20070185951 Lee et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070185952 Langhammer et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070226287 Lin et al. Sep 2007 A1
20070241773 Hutchings et al. Oct 2007 A1
20080133627 Langhammer et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080183783 Tubbs Jul 2008 A1
20090028455 Nakamura et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090172052 DeLaquil et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090187615 Abe et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090300088 Michaels et al. Dec 2009 A1
20100098189 Oketani Apr 2010 A1
20110219052 Langhammer Sep 2011 A1
20110238720 Langhammer Sep 2011 A1
20120113133 Shpigelblat May 2012 A1
20120191967 Lin et al. Jul 2012 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (45)
Number Date Country
0 158 430 Oct 1985 EP
0 380 456 Aug 1990 EP
0 411 491 Feb 1991 EP
0 461 798 Dec 1991 EP
0 498 066 Aug 1992 EP
0 555 092 Aug 1993 EP
0 606 653 Jul 1994 EP
0 657 803 Jun 1995 EP
0 660 227 Jun 1995 EP
0 668 659 Aug 1995 EP
0 721 159 Jul 1996 EP
0 905 906 Mar 1999 EP
0 909 028 Apr 1999 EP
0 927 393 Jul 1999 EP
0 992 885 Apr 2000 EP
1 031 934 Aug 2000 EP
1 058 185 Dec 2000 EP
1 220 108 Jul 2002 EP
2 283 602 May 1995 GB
2 286 737 Aug 1995 GB
2 318 198 Apr 1998 GB
61-237133 Oct 1986 JP
63-216131 Aug 1988 JP
4-332036 Nov 1992 JP
5-134851 Jun 1993 JP
06-187129 Jul 1994 JP
7-135447 May 1995 JP
11-296345 Oct 1999 JP
2000-259394 Sep 2000 JP
2002-108606 Apr 2002 JP
2002-251281 Sep 2002 JP
WO95-27243 Oct 1995 WO
WO96-28774 Sep 1996 WO
WO97-08606 Mar 1997 WO
WO98-12629 Mar 1998 WO
WO98-32071 Jul 1998 WO
WO98-38741 Sep 1998 WO
WO99-22292 May 1999 WO
WO99-31574 Jun 1999 WO
WO99-56394 Nov 1999 WO
WO00-51239 Aug 2000 WO
WO00-52824 Sep 2000 WO
WO01-13562 Feb 2001 WO
WO 2005066832 Jul 2005 WO
WO2005-101190 Oct 2005 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (76)
Entry
Chang et al.. “Iterative QR decomposition Architecture Using the Modified Gram-Schidt Algorithm for MIMO systems”, IEEE, May 2010, pp. 1095-1102.
Altera Corporation, “Advanced Synthesis Cookbook: A Design Guide for Stratix II, Stratix III and Stratix IV Devices,” Document Version 3.0, 112 pgs., May 2008.
deDinechin, F. et al., “Large multipliers with less DSP blocks,” retrieved from http://hal-ens-lyon.archives-ouvertes.fr/ensl-00356421/en/, 9 pgs., available online Jan. 2009.
Wajih, E.-H.Y. et al., “Efficient Hardware Architecture of Recursive Karatsuba-Ofman Multiplier,” 3rd International Conference on Design and Technology of Integrated Systems in Nanoscale Era, 6 pgs, Mar. 2008.
Zhou, G. et al., “Efficient and High-Throughput Implementations of AES-GCM on FPGAs,” International Conference on Field-Programmable Technology, 8 pgs., Dec. 2007.
Altera Corporation, “Statix II Device Handbook, Chapter 6—DSP Blocks in Stratix II Devices,” v1.1, Jul. 2004.
Altera Corporation, “Digital Signal Processing (DSP),” Stratix Device Handbook, vol. 2, Chapter 6 and Chapter 7, v1.1 (Sep. 2004).
Altera Corporation, “DSP Blocks in Stratix II and Stratix II GX Devices,” Stratix II Device Handbook, vol. 2, Chapter 6, v4.0 (Oct. 2005).
Altera Corporation, “FIR Compiler: MegaCore® Function User Guide,” version 3.3.0, rev. 1, pp. 3 11 through 3 15 (Oct. 2005).
Amos, D., “PLD architectures match DSP algorithms,” Electronic Product Design, vol. 17, No. 7, Jul. 1996, pp. 30, 32.
Analog Devices, Inc., The Applications Engineering Staff of Analog Devices, DSP Division, Digital Signal Processing Applications Using the ADSP-2100 Family (edited by Amy Mar), 1990, pp. 141-192).
Andrejas, J., et al., “Reusable DSP functions in FPGAs,” Field-Programmable Logic and Applications. Roadmap to Reconfigurable Computing. 10th International Conference, FPL 2000. Proceedings (Lecture Notes in Computer Science vol. 1896), Aug. 27-30, 2000, pp. 456-461.
Aoki, T., “Signed-weight arithmetic and its application to a field-programmable digital filter architecture,” IEICE Transactions on Electronics, 1999 , vol. E82C, No. 9, Sep. 1999, pp. 1687-1698.
Ashour, M.A., et al., “An FPGA implementation guide for some different types of serial-parallel multiplier-structures,” Microelectronics Journal, vol. 31, No. 3, 2000, pp. 161-168.
Berg, B.L., et al.“Designing Power and Area Efficient Multistage FIR Decimators with Economical Low Order Filters,” ChipCenter Technical Note, Dec. 2001.
Bursky, D., “Programmable Logic Challenges Traditional ASIC SoC Designs”, Electronic Design, Apr. 15, 2002.
Chhabra, A. et al., Texas Instruments Inc., “A Block Floating Point Implementation on the TMS320C54x DSP”, Application Report SPRA610, Dec. 1999, pp. 1-10.
Colet, P., “When DSPs and FPGAs meet: Optimizing image processing architectures,” Advanced Imaging, vol. 12, No. 9, Sep. 1997, pp. 14, 16, 18.
Crookes, D., et al., “Design and implementation of a high level programming environment for FPGA-based image processing,” IEE Proceedings-Vision, Image and Signal Processing, vol. 147, No. 4, Aug. 2000, pp. 377-384.
Debowski, L., et al., “A new flexible architecture of digital control systems based on DSP and complex CPLD technology for power conversion applications,” PCIM 2000: Europe Official Proceedings of the Thirty-Seventh International Intelligent Motion Conference, Jun. 6-8, 2000, pp. 281-286.
Dick, C., et al., “Configurable logic for digital communications: some signal processing perspectives,” IEEE Communications Magazine, vol. 37, No. 8, Aug. 1999, pp. 107-111.
Do, T.-T., et al., “A flexible implementation of high-performance FIR filters on Xilinx FPGAs,” Field-Programmable Logic and Applications: From FPGAs to Computing Paradigm. 8th International Workshop, FPL'98. Proceedings, Hartenstein, R.W., et al., eds., Aug. 31-Sep. 3, 1998, pp. 441-445.
Gaffer, A.A., et al., “Floating-Point Bitwidth Analysis via Automatic Differentiation,” IEEE Conference on Field Programmable Technology, Hong Kong, Dec. 2002.
Guccione, S.A.,“Run-time Reconfiguration at Xilinx,” Parallel and distributed processing: 15 IPDPS 2000 workshops, Rolim, J., ed., May 1-5, 2000, p. 873.
Hauck, S., “The Future of Reconfigurable Systems,” Keynote Address, 5th Canadian Conference on Field Programmable Devices, Jun. 1998, http:--www.ee.washington.edu-people-faculty-hauck-publications-ReconfigFuture.PDF.
Haynes, S.D., et al., “Configurable multiplier blocks for embedding in FPGAs,” Electronicas Letters, vol. 34, No. 7, pp. 638-639 (Apr. 2, 1998).
Heysters, P.M., et al., “Mapping of DSP algorithms on field programmable function arrays,” Field-Programmable Logic and Applications. Roadmap to Reconfigurable Computing. 10th International Conference, FPL 2000 Proceedings (Lecture Notes in Computer Science vol. 1896), Aug. 27-30, 2000, pp. 400-411.
Huang, J., et al., “Simulated Performance of 1000BASE-T Receiver with Different Analog Front End Designs,” Proceedings of the 35th Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems, and Computers, Nov. 4-7, 2001.
Lattice Semiconductor Corp, Orca® FPGA Express™ Interface Manual: ispLEVER®Version 3.0, 2002.
Lucent Technologies, Microelectronics Group,“Implementing and Optimizing Multipliers in ORCA™ FPGAs,”, Application Note.AP97-008FGPA, Feb. 1997.
“Implementing Multipliers in FLEX 10K EABs”, Altera, Mar. 1996.
“Implementing Logic with the Embedded Array in FLEX 10K Devices”, Altera, May 2001, ver. 2.1.
Jinghua Li, “Design a pocket multi-bit multiplier in FPGA,” 1996 2nd International Conference on ASIC Proceedings (IEEE Cat. No. 96TH8140) Oct. 21-24, 1996, pp. 275-279.
Jones, G., “Field-programmable digital signal conditioning,” Electronic Product Design, vol. 21, No. 6, Jun. 2000, pp. C36-C38.
Kiefer, R., et al., “Performance comparison of software-FPGA hardware partitions for a DSP application,” 14th Australian Microelectronics Conference. Microelectronics: Technology Today for the Future. MICRO '97 Proceedings, Sep. 28-Oct. 1, 1997, pp. 88-93.
Kramberger, I., “DSP acceleration using a reconfigurable FPGA,” ISIE '99 Proceedings of the IEEE International Symposium on Industrial Electronics (Cat. No. 99TH8465) vol. 3 , Jul. 12-16, 1999, pp. 1522-1525.
Langhammer, M., “How to implement DSP in programmable logic,” Elettronica Oggi, No. 266 , Dec. 1998, pp. 113-115.
Langhammer, M., “Implementing a DSP in Programmable Logic,” Online EE Times, May 1998, http:--www.eetimes.com-editorial-1998-coverstory9805.html.
Lazaravich, B.V., “Function block oriented field programmable logic arrays,” Motorola, Inc. Technical Developments, vol. 18, Mar. 1993, pp. 10-11.
Lund, D., et al., “A new development system for reconfigurable digital signal processing,” First International Conference on 3G Mobile Communication Technologies (Conf. Publ. No. 471), Mar. 27-29, 2000, pp. 306-310.
Miller, N.L., et al., “Reconfigurable integrated circuit for high performance computer arithmetic,” Proceedings of the 1998 IEE Colloguium on Evolvable Hardware Systems (Digest), No. 233, 1998, pp. 2-1-2-4.
Mintzer, L., “Xilinx FPGA as an FFT processor,” Electronic Engineering, vol. 69, No. 845, May 1997, pp. 81, 82, 84.
Faura et al., “A Novel Mixed Signal Programmable Device With On-Chip Microprocessor,” Custom Integrated Circuits Conference, 1997. Proceedings of the IEEE 1997 Santa Clara, CS, USA, May 5, 1997, pp. 103-106.
Nozal, L., et al., “A new vision system: programmable logic devices and digital signal processor architecture (PLD+DSP),” Proceedings IECON '91. 1991 International Conference on Industrial Electronics, Control and Instrumentation (Cat. No. 91CH2976-9), vol. 3, Oct. 28-Nov. 1, 1991, pp. 2014-2018.
Papenfuss, J.R, et al., “Implementation of a real-time, frequency selective, RF channel simulator using a hybrid DSP-FPGA architecture,” RAWCON 2000: 2000 IEEE Radio and Wireless Conference (Cat. No. 00EX404) Sep. 10-13, 2000, pp. 135-138.
Parhami, B., “Configurable arithmetic arrays with data-driven control,” 34th Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems and Computers, vol. 1, 2000, pp. 89-93.
“The QuickDSP Design Guide”, Quicklogic, Aug. 2001, revision B.
“QuickDSP™ Family Data Sheet”, Quicklogic, Aug. 7, 2001, revision B.
Rangasayee, K., “Complex PLDs let you produce efficient arithmetic designs,” EDN (European Edition) vol. 41, No. 13, Jun. 20, 1996, pp. 109, 110, 112, 114,.
Rosado, A., et al., “A high-speed multiplier coprocessor unit based on FPGA,” Journal of Electrical Engineering, vol. 48, No. 11-12, 1997, pp. 298-302.
Santillan-Q., G.F., et al., “Real-time integer convolution implemented using systolic arrays and a digit-serial architecture in complex programmable logic devices,” Proceedings of the Third International Workshop on Design of Mixed-Mode Integrated Circuits and Applications (Cat. No. 99EX303) Jul. 26-28,1999, pp. 147-150.
Texas Instruments Inc., “TMS320C54x DSP Reference Set, vol. 1: CPU and Peripherals”, Apr. 1999, pp. 2-1 through 2-16 and 4-1 through 4-29.
Tisserand, A., et al., “An on-line arithmetic based FPGA for low power custom computing,” Field Programmable Logic and Applications, 9th International Workshop, FPL'99, Proceedings (Lecture Notes in Computer Science vol. 1673), Lysaght, P., et al., eds., Aug. 30-Sep. 1, 1999, pp. 264-273.
Tralka, C., “Symbiosis of DSP and PLD,” Elektronik, vol. 49, No. 14 , Jul. 11, 2000, pp. 84-96.
Underwood, K. “FPGAs vs. CPUs: Trends in Peak Floating-Point Performance,” Proceedings of the 2004 ACM-SIGDA 12th International Symposium on Field Programmable Gate Arrays, pp. 171-180, Feb. 22-24, 2004.
Valls, J., et al., “A Study About FPGA-Based Digital Filters,” Signal Processing Systems, 1998, SIPS 98, 1998 IEEE Workshop, Oct. 10, 1998, pp. 192-201.
“Virtex-II 1.5V Field-Programmable Gate Arrays”, Xilinx, Jan. 25, 2001, module 2 of 4.
“Virtex-II 1.5V Field-Programmable Gate Arrays”, Xilinx, Apr. 2, 2001, module 1 of 4.
“Virtex-II 1.5V Field-Programmable Gate Arrays”, Xilinx, Apr. 2, 2001, module 2 of 4.
Walters, A.L., “A Scaleable FIR Filter Implementation Using 32-bit Floating-Point Complex Arithmetic on ,a FPGA Based Custom Computing Platform,” Allison L. Walters, Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Jan. 30, 1998.
Weisstein, E.W., “Karatsuba Multiplication ” MathWorld—A Wolfram Web Resource (Dec. 9, 2007), accessed Dec. 11, 2007 at http:--mathworld.wolfram.com-KaratsubaMultiplication.html.
Wenzel, L., “Field programmable gate arrays (FPGAs) to replace digital signal processor integrated circuits,” Elektronik, vol. 49, No. 5, Mar. 7, 2000, pp. 78-86.
“Xilinx Unveils New FPGA Architecture to Enable High-Performance, 10 Million System Gate Designs”, Xilinx, Jun. 22, 2000.
“Xilinx Announces DSP Algorithms, Tools and Features for Virtex-II Architecture”, Xilinx, Nov. 21, 2000.
Xilinx Inc., “Virtex-II 1.5V Field-Programmable Gate Arrays”, Advance Product Specification, DS031-2 (v1.9), Nov. 29, 2001, Module 2 of 4, pp. 1-39.
Xilinx Inc., “Using Embedded Multipliers”, Virtex-II Platform FPGA Handbook, UG002 (v1.3), Dec. 3, 2001, pp. 251-257.
Xilinx, Inc., “A 1D Systolic FIR,” copyright 1994-2002, downloaded from http:--www.iro.umontreal.ca-˜aboulham-F6221-Xilinx%20A%201D%20systolic%20FIR.htm.
Xilinx, Inc., “The Future of FPGA's,” White Paper, available Nov. 14, 2005 for download from http:--www.xilinx.com-prs—rls,5yrwhite.htm.
Xilinx Inc., “XtremeDSP Design Considerations User Guide,” v 1.2, Feb. 4, 2005.
Xilinx Inc., “Complex Multiplier v2.0”, DS291 Product Specification/Datasheet, Nov. 2004.
Kim, Y., et al., “Fast GPU Implementation for the Solution of Tridiagonal Matrix Systems,” Journal of Korean Institute of Information Scientists and Engineers, vol. 32, No. 12, pp. 692-704, Dec. 2005.
Govindu, G. et al., “A Library of Parameterizable Floating-Point Cores for FPGAs and Their Application to Scientific Computing,” Proc Int'l Conf. Eng. Reconfigurable Systems and Algorithms (ERSA'05), Jun. 2005.
Govindu, G. et al., “Analysis of High-performance Floating-point Arithmetic on FPGAs,” Proceedings of the 18th International Parallel and Distributed Processing Symposium (PDPS'04) pp. 149-156, Apr. 2004.
Nakasato, N., et al., “Acceleration of Hydrosynamical Simulations using a FPGA board”, The Institute of Electronics Information and Communication Technical Report CPSY2005-47, vol. 105, No. 515, Jan. 17, 2006.
Osana, Y., et al., “Hardware-resource Utilization Analysis on an FPGA-Based Biochemical Simulator ReCSiP”, The Institute of Electronics Information and Communication Technical Report CPSY2005-63, vol. 105, No. 516, Jan. 18, 2006.
Vladimirova, T. et al., “Floating-Point Mathematical Co-Processor for a Single-Chip On-Board Computer,” MAPLD'03 Conference, D5, Sep. 2003.