This patent application is based on Provisional Patent Application No. 61/699,293, filed on Sep. 11, 2012.
The present invention pertains generally to the field of carburetion and fuel injection, and more particularly to the transport of the fuel/air mixture.
A carburetor or a fuel injector is a device that causes the creation of a mixture of fuel and air in a predictable and efficient ratio. In the case of a carburetor fuel is introduced into an air volume which is subsequently transported to the combustion space within a cylinder. In the case of a fuel injector the fuel is sometimes injected directly into the cylinder combustion space, but in other situations is injected into an air volume that is then sent to the cylinder as is typical with carburetion systems. In either case, the fuel/air ratio is dependent on throttle setting.
Controlling airflow volume and velocity within a carburetor largely determines the parameters relating to throttle response, engine power, fuel atomization, specific fuel consumption and the operating consistency of the engine. When an engine is operated at a constant throttle setting under a constant load and in constant atmospheric conditions, the carburetor can be of a simple design while still permitting the engine to operate efficiently. In the real world of motor vehicle operation the load changes frequently as the vehicle accelerates, decelerates and changes elevation. Maintaining the appropriate airflow volume and velocity under these changing conditions is extremely challenging.
The basic problem of carburetor air flow and fuel mixture dynamics may be better understood with reference to
The fuel/air mixture is actually composed of many closely adjacent air molecules and fuel particles, all travelling through the carburetor along diverse paths. For example, path 59 represents a region of air molecules that travel along a relatively straight path 58 at a relatively constant velocity. The adjacent path 60 follows a completely different path 63 in which the velocity changes dramatically along the path 63. The amount of fuel entrained along either path 59 or 60 cannot be calculated with precision. Complicating matters is the creation of voids such as region 56, in which the velocity of the air/fuel mixture may be relatively low while the fuel/air density in region 56 may be relatively high. The result is a nonlinear throttle response as the slide 46 is moved, along with an unpredictable interaction with any reversionary wave generated during the combustion process.
The prior art carburetor 41 is depicted in
Another device used to create an air/fuel mixture for use in an internal combustion engine is the throttle body 93 as illustrated in
A prior art throttle body 93 is depicted in
For example, path 101 represents a region of air molecules that travel along a relatively straight path 106 at a relatively constant velocity. The adjacent path 102 follows a longer path 107. Path 103 follows a substantially more circuitous path in which the velocity changes dramatically along the path 108. The presence of the valve 94 creates voids such as region 109, resulting in a nonlinear throttle response as the valve 94 is moved, along with the unpredictable influence exerted on any reversionary wave generated during the combustion process.
The prior art throttle body 93 is depicted in
Numerous devices have been developed for placement within the fuel/air transport stream to address the problems caused by variations in throttle setting and the load placed on the engine. A common theme in such devices is a belief that the creation of relatively greater turbulence within the air/fuel will promote better combustion and fuel economy. For example, U.S. Pat. No. 3,952,776, entitled “Fluid Flow Device”, inserts a variable cross section member into the throat of a carburetor in an effort to increase air flow velocity on the intake side of the carburetor.
U.S. Pat. No. 4,359,035, entitled “Intake Manifold Fuel Atomizing Screen”, uses a mechanical strainer 11 in an effort to create a homogenous fuel/air mixture on the intake side of the carburetor. The strainer is three dimensional and can incorporate various geometries. This device is supposed to redirect the flow in numerous directions, including upstream.
U.S. Pat. No. 4,491,106, entitled “Throttle Configuration Achieving High Velocity Channel at Partial Opening”, presents numerous butterfly valve geometries to increase intake airflow.
U.S. Pat. No. 4,620,951, entitled “Slideable Throttle Valve Assembly for a Carburetor and Associated Method of Operation”, discloses a slide valve that attempts to improve performance by improving the seal between the slide valve and the groove within which the slide valve operates. This arrangement theoretically forces the intake air to flow under the valve and theoretically prevents intake air from flowing around the sides of the valve.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,636,612, entitled “Adjustable Air Velocity Stacks for Two Stroke Fuel Injected Engines” discloses a slideable throttle plate defined by front and rear surfaces 38 and 40 which permit a series of ports 52-62 to be opened or closed to a desired degree.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,718,198, entitled “Slide Throttle Valve for an Engine Intake System” discloses a sliding throttle plate 26 which includes a series of openings 28 that are followed by a series of tubular channels 18 that lead to the intake plenum 23. The channelized or at least separated flow follows a plate that serves as a throttle adjustment.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,879,595, entitled “Carburetor Internal Vent and Fuel Regulation Assembly” discloses a vent within a carburetor that constantly monitors air pressure within the carburetor and adjusts airflow in response thereto. The '595 carburetor does not use a throttle valve. U.S. Pat. No. 7,111,607, entitled, “Air Intake Device of Internal Combustion Engine” discloses an engine intake device in which a cylinder head has two intake ports that are divided by a partition that divides the intake ports into upper and lower passages. U.S. Pat. No. 7,665,442 “Throttle Plate for use with Internal Combustion Engine” discloses vortex generators 14 that surround an airflow passageway to create turbulence.
While the '198 and '612 patents show a throttle plate followed by channels, neither is used within a carburetor and both require the use of a perforated throttle plate. The '035 patent creates the most turbulent flow possible while introducing some pressure loss in the system, and fails to control or direct the turbulent flow in any predictable manner. These characteristics also true of the '442 patent, although a well defined vortex possesses more predictable airflow effects than a screen or baffle.
U.S. Pat. No. 7,690,349, entitled “Throttle Body Spacer for use with Internal Combustion Engines” discloses four fins placed in the fuel/air flow path immediately following the throttle. The fins are bent or twisted in an effort to create a circular or spiral flow in the region following the spacer. This mechanism is intended to promote relatively more thorough fuel atomization. U.S. Pat. No. 8,220,444, entitled “System for Improving the Efficiency of an Internal Combustion Engine of a Vehicle”, discloses a set of curved longitudinal fins within the intake and exhaust manifold intended to accelerate airflow to and from the engine.
The prior art discloses many attempts to realign the airflow through a carburetor throat. Efforts to increase turbulence are frequently presented in a mistaken effort to promote mixing of air and fuel in a process analogous to stirring. Unfortunately, efforts to create turbulence tend to create an unpredictable array of voids and eddies which do not promote either mixing or a predictable throttle response. What is not disclosed in the prior art is a method of consistently forming and controlling channelized, laminar airflow at a relatively low Reynold's Number in the region immediately following the throttle plate and regardless of throttle position.
The present invention is a torque wing or blade that is installed on the engine side of a carburetor throttle slide. In a preferred embodiment the torque wing divides the carburetor bore into four quadrants, utilizing a horizontal and vertical air stabilizer.
At partial throttle settings of a sliding throttle plate, these stabilizers substantially reduce losses attributable to air turbulence created by a relatively low air flow tumbling into the relatively large volume of the carburetor throat. The reduction in volume or the throat region that is created by the present invention increases air velocity to the engine, improving fuel atomization and engine output power. The flow divider may be used in association with both two and four cycle engines.
The present invention is compatible with engine intake systems including reed valve, piston port or rotary valve. During the operation of an internal combustion engine, relatively turbulent reversionary pulse waves are formed that travel through the engine intake path residing between the engine and the carburetor. The present invention substantially reduces the turbulence associated with the pulse, thereby permitting the pulse to return relatively rapidly to the engine intake manifold and in a relatively orderly state subsequent to reflection from the carburetor output region.
In a typical slide throttle carburetor, any throttle position at half throttle or less normally creates a substantial reduction in throat air velocity. This velocity reduction is due to some portion of the air flow that passes under the carburetor slide being allowed to enter the full size of the carburetor bore, thereby producing turbulence and a corresponding drop in air velocity. The horizontal stabilizer of the present invention reduces this drop in air velocity, thereby producing quicker throttle response and an increase in engine torque. The present invention reduces multidirectional turbulence throughout the full range of throttle travel.
The present invention creates a small space between the stabilizer edges and the carburetor throat wall to equalize and improve stability of the air flow to each of the four quadrants. A portion of the leading edges of the stabilizers protrude past the end of the carburetor throat and extends into the engine intake manifold. The extended edges promote stability of the air column and delay deterioration of the airflow into a turbulent state. In a typical reed valve engine, the travelling air column is relatively stable throughout the entire path between the carburetor and the reed valve.
The present invention typically includes four locating tabs to permit mounting within the carburetor. Two additional tabs are used to prevent the flow divider from twisting and to permit attachment to the rubber intake manifold boot for added security. Typically the wing is constructed from stainless steel and is thus relatively impervious to rust, corrosion, fuel or additives.
The flow divider is installed in the bore of the carburetor between the engine side of the carburetor slide and an intake device such as a conventional intake valve that is common on all four cycle engines, reed valve, rotary valve and piston port. The present stabilizer extends beyond the end of the carburetor. The present invention is applicable to two or four cycle engines or any other number of cycles as occurs, for example, with rotary engines. The invention is a fixed position airflow stabilizer using a horizontal airflow stabilizer and an orthogonal vertical airflow stabilizer, thereby dividing the carburetor bore into four quadrants.
Carburetors nominally of a specific size vary in actual dimensions due to manufacturing tolerances. In order to achieve an accurate fit and secure installation, locating tabs on integrally formed on the edge of the stabilizer that can be formed and adjusted to accommodate an accurate fit. In some cases the present invention also includes lock tabs that fit into two small notches which the installer forms into the carburetor body. The lock tabs prevent the flow divider from rotating, twisting or generally moving. The lock tabs extend beyond the outside diameter of the carburetor body further locking the torque wing into position by providing a slight interference fit into the rubber manifold which holds the carburetor to the engine.
The flow divider typically abuts or is immediately adjacent to the carburetor bore along substantially the total length of the bore. The flow divider preserves a small distance between the carburetor slide and the flow divider in order to prevent both mechanical and fluid flow interference between the two structures.
Insofar as the flow divider affects airflow into the engine as well as reversionary pulse waves of the reflected fuel/air mixture flow, all four quadrants are ideally fully charged and processing airflow. In order to accomplish this goal a space is preserved between the inside diameter of the carburetor bore and the flow divider. A space is also preserved between the carburetor slide and the flow divider. This spacing allows all four quadrants to equalize, charging each chamber or quadrant to maximum capacity. The invention increases fuel efficiency through superior fuel atomization. This causes the engine to be less sensitive to temperature and altitude changes and fuel quality changes. An increase in fuel mileage derived from reduced specific fuel consumption, or an increase in available engine power at a given throttle setting is the apparent result of utilizing the present invention.
The upper edge 131 extends beyond a corner 8 and transitions to a sloped edge 72. The sloped edge resides at an angle 74 of approximately forty five degrees with respect to upper edge 131, terminating at corner 73. The trailing edge 75 begins at the corner 73 until reaching the intersection 10 of vertical plate 2 and horizontal plate 3. The trailing edge 75 is substantially orthogonal to the upper edge 131.
The placement within a carburetor throat of the torque wing 1 is somewhat critical in order to achieve the full operational advantages of the present invention. In order to properly secure and position the torque wing 1, a series of locating and securing extensions or tabs are integrally formed on the edges of the horizontal plate 3.
Referring also to
In order to secure the torque wing 2 to an adjoining carburetor or air intake manifold boot, and thus prevent sliding of the torque wing 2 within a carburetor throat, securing tabs 5 and 24 extend outwardly from edges 17 and 18, respectively. The tabs have a tip region, such as tip region 25, which is suitably shaped and dimensioned to fit or protrude into a rubber seal that is typically found at the interface between the downstream carburetor exit and the upstream intake manifold entrance.
The torque wing 1 may be modified to accommodate different carburetor geometries. Referring to
As seen in
The torque wing 1 is shown in
The upper edge 131 of the vertical plate 2 is seen to be spaced apart from the nearest adjacent point 45 of the inner wall 44 by a distance 47 due to the geometry imposed by the locating tabs 4, 14, 15 and 16. The magnitude of distance 45 is within the range of 0.05 to 0.10 inch. A smaller spacing tends to create the risk of an interference fit between the edge 131 and the inner wall 44, while a larger spacing tends to diminish the effectiveness of the wing 1 in preserving a channelized flow. Similarly, the lower edge 13 of plate 2 is seen to be separated from the inner wall 44 by a distance that is substantially equal to the distance 45.
The leading edge 6 of the wing 1 is spaced apart from the trailing edge 50 of the carburetor slide 46 by a distance 49. In practice the magnitude of distance 49 is in the range of 0.10 to 0.20 inch. The distance 49 is important to the proper function of wing 1 by preserving the channelized flow of both the forward and reversionary flow of the fuel/air mixture through the carburetor throat 42 while avoiding interference between the wing 1 and the slide 46.
The trailing edge 75 of the wing 1 extends beyond the trailing edge 71 of the carburetor by a distance 48. The path followed by the fuel/air mixture leaving the carburetor 41 can be highly variable depending upon the mounting of the carburetor with respect to an internal combustion engine on a specific motor vehicle, which necessarily dictates the geometry and placement of the intake manifold. In a typical installation, the distance 48 is approximately one inch, but in other cases could be lengthened substantially if the intake manifold permitted. In the case of a two cycle engine, the distance 48 may be great enough to permit the trailing edge 75 to extend substantially the entire distance between the carburetor trailing edge 71 and the intake valve at the engine itself.
The operation of the torque wing 1 can be better appreciated with reference to
With the throttle slide 46 approximately fully open as depicted in
All of the paths exiting the carburetor 41 are substantially parallel to each other as well as the vertical plate 2 of the wing 1. The gap 91 immediately following the trailing edge 50 of the throttle slide 46 receives substantially none of the air/fuel mixture because the flow path through the gap 91 represents a relatively high pressure region in comparison to the relatively low pressure region occupied by flow paths 88, 89 and 90. The region 92 adjacent to the vertical plate 2 does not support substantial flow of the air/fuel mixture, but does provide a path for the equalization or orderly propagation of any reversionary waves caused by the combustion process, thereby minimizing the effect of the reversionary wave on the channelized flow represented by flow paths 88, 89 and 90.
Referring also to
The adjacent entry path 115 is also displaced by the presence of trailing edge 128, but adopts an exit path 116 when passing by the vertical plate 2 and horizontal plate 3, the exit path 116 being substantially parallel to the adjacent exit path 114. The entry path 117 is substantially deflected by the presence of the butterfly valve 127, travelling around the trailing edge 128 and entering a region 126 of relatively low pressure. However, the exit path 118 becomes parallel to exit paths 116 and 114 upon reaching plates 2 and 3.
Referring also to
The remainder of the vertical wing 133 is defined by a tapering trailing edge 135. Extending from the trailing edge 135 is a series of locating tabs, such as locating tab 138 and 146, both of which tend to align the seam 143 with any longitudinal axis that may exist within a particular intake manifold structure. As best seen in
The horizontal wing 134 is formed to include a leading edge 148 that is substantially coplanar with the leading edge 147 of the vertical wing 133. The horizontal wing 134 also includes a substantially continuous trailing edge 136, the horizontal wing having a length 149 that causes the trailing edge 136 to extend beyond the trailing edge 135 of the vertical wing 133 by a distance 137. The portion of the horizontal wing 134 that resides within the distance 137 permits the air/fuel mixture to exit the torque wing 132 in a relatively more stable manner by avoiding a sudden transition across the two trailing edge structures 135 and 136 simultaneously.
Referring also to
The effect of the torque wing 132 on air/fuel mixture flow within the intake path 156 is depicted in
In the preferred embodiment of the present invention, the torque wing 1 is composed of metal. However, the use of plastic materials is also acceptable if they are sufficiently durable to withstand continued exposure to the carburetor environment. The use of ceramic materials is also possible, especially if the manufacturing tolerances of the carburetor or throttle body throat is sufficiently well defined that the locating and spacing tabs do not need to deflect in order to provide a secure fit while maintaining the desired spacing from the carburetor or throttle body wall. While particular ranges of spacing between the edges of the torque wing 1 and the surrounding wall and throttle elements have been specified, variations in spacing may be required in particular installations.
The geometry of the upper, lower and trailing edges may deviate from a continuous straight or curved line in order to accommodate protruding features within the carburetor throat or cylinder head inlet path. In some applications a serrated edge or orthogonal lip may provide improved interaction with a reversionary pulse wave. Further, the length of the torque wing may vary substantially from the dimensions shown. Ideally, the length of the torque wing occupies substantially the entire length of the intake manifold. In practice, the relatively short torque wing illustrated is an example of a universal device that is adaptable to a wide variety of intake manifold geometries, as is appropriate for a device intended to be retrofitted in an existing engine installation. However, in those situations where the torque wing is to be installed during original equipment manufacturing and installation, the torque wing may be shaped to occupy almost all of a relatively lengthy and tortuous intake manifold shape. In any event, the appended claims define the scope of the invention.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1382285 | Harris | Jun 1921 | A |
1503371 | Meyer | Jul 1924 | A |
2377088 | Linn | May 1945 | A |
3952776 | Eversole et al. | Apr 1976 | A |
3982504 | Noguchi | Sep 1976 | A |
4114580 | Coats | Sep 1978 | A |
4295458 | Pellerin | Oct 1981 | A |
4359035 | Johnson | Nov 1982 | A |
4384563 | Siefer | May 1983 | A |
4491106 | Morris | Jan 1985 | A |
4492212 | Dooley | Jan 1985 | A |
4620951 | Makino et al. | Nov 1986 | A |
4667648 | Beldin | May 1987 | A |
4971730 | Edmonston | Nov 1990 | A |
5027754 | Morone | Jul 1991 | A |
5113838 | Kim | May 1992 | A |
5342555 | Edmonston | Aug 1994 | A |
5636612 | Brucato | Jun 1997 | A |
5685281 | Li | Nov 1997 | A |
5718198 | Adamisin | Feb 1998 | A |
5758614 | Choi | Jun 1998 | A |
5879595 | Holtzman | Mar 1999 | A |
5924398 | Choi | Jul 1999 | A |
6041753 | Lin | Mar 2000 | A |
6076499 | Klumpp | Jun 2000 | A |
6158412 | Kim | Dec 2000 | A |
6227185 | Spracher | May 2001 | B1 |
6257212 | Hammond | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6612295 | Lerner | Sep 2003 | B2 |
7111607 | Oota | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7131514 | Choi | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7322333 | Isaji | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7325538 | Bean | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7458344 | Holtorf | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7556031 | Russell | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7665442 | Levitz et al. | Feb 2010 | B1 |
7690349 | Bolanos | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7743756 | Styles | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7762229 | Abe | Jul 2010 | B2 |
8051846 | Sugishita | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8141538 | Yang | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8166775 | Choi | May 2012 | B2 |
8220444 | Cheung et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8844492 | Free | Sep 2014 | B2 |
20010050075 | Lerner | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20030150439 | Hsu | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030226539 | Kim | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040031471 | Leuenberger | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040065296 | Arimatsu | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040255660 | Abdolhosseini | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20060150811 | Callahan | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20070044780 | Yamamoto | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070266989 | Yang | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20100031920 | Chien | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100031921 | Rarick | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100154756 | Chien | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100266395 | Hermann | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20130047960 | Yamamoto | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130125861 | Yamamoto | May 2013 | A1 |
20130255616 | Yao | Oct 2013 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20150052748 A1 | Feb 2015 | US |