1. Field of the Invention
The present invention is directed toward the field of television tuning, and more particularly toward a baseband filter for demodulating a television signal.
2. Art Background
In general, televisions include circuits to demodulate radio frequency television signals to generate video and sound signals. The video and sound signals provide the information necessary to form the television picture and sound, respectively. An ultrahigh frequency (“UHF”)/very high frequency (“VHF”) tuner is one type of circuit found in television receivers. In general, the UHF/VHF tuner receives a radio frequency (“RF”) television signal that includes a plurality of channels. The channels are modulated on a carrier frequency. The carrier frequency may be in the UHF spectrum or the VHF spectrum. The television is set or tuned to receive a specific channel (e.g., channel 2). The U/V tuner processes the RF television signal based on the channel selected, and generates an intermediate frequency (“IF”) signal. In the United States, the intermediate frequency, used in television receivers, is set to a frequency of 45.75 Mhz.
Television receivers also include circuits to perform intermediate frequency processing. These IF television circuits typically employ surface acoustic wave (“SAW”) filters. The SAW filter conditions the IF signal prior to demodulation (i.e., prior to extracting the video and audio signals). The SAW filter rejects or suppresses the energy bands associated with channels adjacent to the desired channel (i.e., the selected channel). To this end, the SAW filter provides a Nyquist slope bandpass response for the IF signal.
As discussed above, the SAW filter provides a Nyquist slope response.
b illustrates various waveform responses as a result of the SAW filter. The ideal waveform response, waveform 230, is a result of the SAW filter providing an ideal Nyquist slope (i.e., slope 200 of
When using a SAW filter in the television receiver, the non-ideal Nyquist slopes (210 and 220,
Also, as shown in
It is advantageous to generate a Nyquist slope response in a filter that eliminates the undesirable characteristics introduced through use of a SAW filter.
A television demodulator circuit, for use in a television receiver, generates baseband video and audio outputs. An I, Q demodulator circuit receives a television signal (e.g., intermediate frequency signal) for demodulation. The I, Q demodulator circuit mixes the television signal with an in-phase (“I”) local oscillator signal and a quadrature phase (“Q”) local oscillator signal at the tuned frequency (i.e., the frequency for the channel that the television is currently tuned) to generate baseband I and Q signals. The baseband I and Q signals are conditioned by filters. In one embodiment, the baseband I and Q signals are input to low pass filters and a Nyquist slope filter. The Nyquist slope filter generates, for the baseband I and Q signals, a Nyquist slope response and attenuates channels adjacent to the tuned television channel.
In one embodiment, Nyquist slope filter comprises a transfer function with at least two zero crossings, so as to provide a notch filter response for attenuation of a television channel adjacent to the tuned television channel. For example, the transfer function for the Nyquist slope filter may comprise a zero crossing at the sound carrier frequency for the television channel adjacent to the tuned television channel. In another embodiment, the transfer function has three zero crossings to attenuate a sound carrier frequency, a color carrier frequency, and a picture frequency for the television channel adjacent to the tuned television channel (e.g., the television channel at a lower frequency). In one implementation for the Nyquist slope filter, the transfer function, expressed in the S domain, comprises an all-pass fractional transfer function with a real number in the numerator and a complex number in the denominator. The Nyquist slope filter comprises inverters so that the transfer function includes only terms in the numerator with the same sign.
In one embodiment, the demodulator circuit is incorporated into a television receiver. The television receiver includes a downconverter circuit for processing an input radio frequency (“RF”) television signal suitable for input to the demodulator circuit. In one embodiment, the downconverter circuit utilizes a double down conversion scheme. In a second embodiment, the downconverter circuit utilizes a single down conversion scheme
a illustrates various Nyquist slope responses.
b illustrates various waveform responses as a result of the SAW filter.
The disclosure of U.S. Provisional Patent Application 60/383,937, filed May 28, 2002, entitled “Quadratic Nyquist Slope Filter For A Television Receiver” is hereby expressly incorporated herein by reference.
For this embodiment, the down conversion function is performed by downconverter 310, phase locked loop 390, and voltage controlled oscillator 380. In general, downconverter 310 converts the RF input signal to an IF signal through use of the voltage controlled oscillator 380. The phase locked loop 390 locks the phases of the input RF signal to the phase of the local oscillator signal.
If receiver 300 employs a direct demodulation scheme, downconverter 310 is replaced with a tunable bandpass filter. In general, in a direct demodulation scheme, the RF signal is directly demodulated (i.e., the input to the demodulator is the filtered RF signal). The tunable bandpass filter 310 filters the RF signal for the tuned channel of receiver 300.
The IF signal or RF signal for the direct demodulation embodiment, output from the tunable bandpass filter/downconverter 310, is input to the RF ports of mixers 307 and 320. As shown in
The demodulator portion of receiver 300 also includes mixer 330 to extract the sound intermediate frequency carrier (“SIF”). As shown in
As shown in
A band of RF frequencies is converted to the first IF frequency. In order to convert the range of frequencies, the local oscillator 445 (
An image signal, f1, is an output product of mixer 450 (i.e., the image signal, f1, results from mixing the RF signal with the local oscillator signal of local oscillator 445). For example, an RF input signal with a fundamental frequency of 55 MHz is mixed with a local oscillator having a frequency of 100.75 MHz to produce a first harmonic at 45.75 MHz (RF (100.75 Mhz)−LO (55 Mhz)=45.75 Mhz). In turn, this first harmonic, centered around 45.75 MHz, mixes with the local oscillator frequency of 100.75 MHz to produce an image at 155.75 MHz (45.75 Mhz+100.75 Mhz=155.75 Mhz). The image frequencies require suppression for proper operation of the circuit.
For the embodiment of
A second down conversion circuit, which includes IF bandpass filter 460, AGC circuit 470, mixer 480, and local oscillator 475, converts RF signals from the first intermediate frequency (45.75 MHz) to a second intermediate frequency (10.5 MHz). The IF2 composite filter 485 processes the IF2 television signal for extraction of the tuned channel sound carrier (Fs) and the tuned channel picture carrier (Fp). An AGC circuit 490 provides additional gain for the color carrier frequency.
A band of RF frequencies is converted to the IF frequency. In order to convert the range of frequencies, the local oscillator 535 (
The IF1 bandpass filter 540 filters the IF television signal for the IF frequency of 20 MHz. The AGC 545 circuit provides gain for the IF television signal, and the IF1 composite filter 550 processes the IF1 television signal for extraction of the tuned channel sound carrier (Fs) and the tuned channel picture carrier (Fp). An AGC circuit 560 provides additional gain for the color carrier frequency.
As shown in
The Nyquist slope filter of the present invention also provides adjacent channel rejection. In one embodiment, the Nyquist slope filter response includes at least two zero crossings. For the embodiment shown in
The differential outputs of double balanced mixer 470 (Q channel) are input to low pass filter 450. Similarly, the differential outputs of double balanced mixer 455 (I channel) are input to low pass filter 445. In one embodiment, the low pass filters (445 and 450) are configured as Butterworth lowpass filters. For this embodiment, low pass filter 450 consists of resistors 446 and 449, capacitors 451 and 447, and bipolar transistor 457. Similarly, low pass filter 445 consists of resistors 452 and 454, capacitors 453 and 456, and bipolar transistor 458. As shown in
In one embodiment, the transfer function, expressed in the S domain, of the Butterworth lowpass filter for the I channel follows.
The transfer function, also expressed in the S domain, of the Butterworth lowpass filter for the Q channel may be expressed as:
In one embodiment, the transfer function for the Nyquist slope filter comprises an all-pass filter. The transfer function is expressed in the S domain. The transfer function is at least a second order function. In one embodiment, the transfer function includes a real number in the numerator and a complex number in the denominator. The Nyquist slope filter comprises inverters so that the transfer function includes only terms in the numerator with the same sign. Specifically, the Nyquist slope filter transfer function may be expressed as:
This denominator may be factored as follows.
1+S1+S1×S2+S1×S2×S3=(1+Sa)×(1Sb)×(1Sc)
Thus, the filter transfer function may also be expressed as:
The Nyquist slope transfer function may be expressed as:
The Nyquist slope filter of the present invention has several advantages over implementing the Nyquist slope in the IF SAW filter. As discussed above in the Background of the Invention section, the SAW filter requires an adjustment in order to track the input frequency with the bandpass characteristics of the SAW filter. In contrast, no tracking or tuning of the Nyquist slope filter is required. In addition, the IF SAW filter implementation introduces group delay in the television signal. No such group delay is introduced through use of the Nyquist slope filter. The SAW filter also generates a large insertion loss for the television signal, between 12–20 dB. Furthermore, the IF SAW filter has a large thermal dependency. The thermal dependency in the SAW filters causes tracking problems for tuning.
Using the Nyquist slope filter of the present invention, no tracking or tuning is required if the I, Q demodulator is phase locked to the input signal. The Nyquist slope filter provides a better Nyquist slope and adjacent channel rejection than the SAW filter implementation. Furthermore, there is no significant signal loss in the Nyquist slope filter. Thus, a 55 dB signal to noise ratio, required to eliminate distortion perceived by a human, is easy to achieve.
This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/383,937, filed May 28, 2002, entitled “Quadratic Nyquist Slope Filter For A Television Receiver.”
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1735742 | Fetter | Nov 1929 | A |
2140770 | Schofield | Dec 1938 | A |
2325174 | Cooper | Jul 1943 | A |
2464557 | Crockett | Mar 1949 | A |
2496177 | Richards et al. | Jan 1950 | A |
2531312 | Loon | Nov 1950 | A |
2549789 | Ferrill | Apr 1951 | A |
2796524 | Ferrill | Jun 1957 | A |
2801341 | Jaffe | Jul 1957 | A |
3252096 | Carlson | May 1966 | A |
3400345 | Oloff | Sep 1968 | A |
3488595 | Vasile | Jan 1970 | A |
3509500 | McNair et al. | Apr 1970 | A |
3544903 | Sakamoto | Dec 1970 | A |
3686575 | Chamberlain | Aug 1972 | A |
3794941 | Templin | Feb 1974 | A |
3906350 | Musiak | Sep 1975 | A |
3931578 | Gittinger | Jan 1976 | A |
4112378 | Ito et al. | Sep 1978 | A |
4118679 | Hiday et al. | Oct 1978 | A |
4138654 | Luhowy | Feb 1979 | A |
4296391 | Hazama et al. | Oct 1981 | A |
4333079 | Dick et al. | Jun 1982 | A |
4379271 | Lehmann | Apr 1983 | A |
4456895 | Landt et al. | Jun 1984 | A |
4514763 | Rindal | Apr 1985 | A |
4555809 | Carlson | Nov 1985 | A |
4598423 | Hettiger | Jul 1986 | A |
4785253 | Hughes | Nov 1988 | A |
4789897 | Kappeler et al. | Dec 1988 | A |
4812851 | Giubardo | Mar 1989 | A |
4818903 | Kawano | Apr 1989 | A |
4882614 | Kageyama et al. | Nov 1989 | A |
4910798 | Boardman | Mar 1990 | A |
4970479 | Landt et al. | Nov 1990 | A |
4985769 | Yasumoto et al. | Jan 1991 | A |
4988902 | Dingwall | Jan 1991 | A |
5077542 | Lanoiselee | Dec 1991 | A |
5122868 | Isnardi | Jun 1992 | A |
5146337 | Grubbs | Sep 1992 | A |
5146338 | Lehmann et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
5148280 | Wignot et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
5155580 | Gibson et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
5187445 | Jackson | Feb 1993 | A |
5287180 | White | Feb 1994 | A |
5386239 | Wang et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5491715 | Flaxl | Feb 1996 | A |
5519265 | Latham | May 1996 | A |
5525940 | Heikkila et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5663773 | Goeckler | Sep 1997 | A |
5737035 | Rotzoll | Apr 1998 | A |
5898900 | Richter et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5905398 | Todsen et al. | May 1999 | A |
5912829 | Maier | Jun 1999 | A |
5914633 | Comino et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
6016170 | Takayama et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6094236 | Abe et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6169569 | Widmer et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6177964 | Birleson | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6219376 | Zhodzishsky et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6226509 | Mole et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6243567 | Saito | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6256495 | Francisco et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6275113 | Nakano et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6304619 | Citta et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6307443 | Gabara | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6324233 | Sempel et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6424206 | Takahashi et al. | Dec 2001 | B2 |
6351293 | Perlow | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6359940 | Ciccarelli et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6377315 | Carr et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6424209 | Gorecki et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6470055 | Feher | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6535075 | Frech et al. | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6535722 | Rosen et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6538521 | Kobayashi et al. | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6593828 | Helfenstein et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6597748 | Hietala et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6628728 | McCarty, Jr. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6631256 | Suominen | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6636085 | Okazaki et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6657678 | Mizukami et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6667649 | Lee | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6725463 | Birleson | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6750734 | Utsunomiya et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6778022 | Zhang et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6778594 | Liu | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6882245 | Utsunomiya et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6940365 | Kamata et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
20020050861 | Nguyen et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20030053562 | Busson et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030097601 | Glas et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030186671 | Prodanov et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030197810 | Jaffe | Oct 2003 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0 392 449 | Oct 1990 | EP |
0 676 880 | Oct 1995 | EP |
0 707 379 | Apr 1996 | EP |
WO 95 22839 | Aug 1995 | WO |
WO 01 06637 | Jan 2001 | WO |
WO 01 28310 | Apr 2001 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20030223017 A1 | Dec 2003 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60383937 | May 2002 | US |