In the field of geophysical prospecting, the knowledge of the earth's subsurface structure is useful for finding and extracting valuable mineral resources such as oil and natural gas. A well-known tool of geophysical prospecting is a “seismic survey.” In a seismic survey, acoustic waves produced by one or more sources are transmitted into the earth as an acoustic signal. When the acoustic signal encounters an interface between two subsurface strata having different acoustic impedances, a portion of the acoustic signal is reflected back to the earth's surface. Sensors detect these reflected portions of the acoustic signal, and the sensors' outputs are recorded as data. Seismic data processing techniques are then applied to the collected data to estimate the subsurface structure. It should be noted that there are other geophysical survey techniques (e.g., gravimetric, magnetic, and electromagnetic surveys) that can be used to collect subsurface information and the present disclosure is also applicable to many of those survey systems.
Geophysical surveys can be performed on land or in water, and they can be repeated in order to track changes in the subsurface formations such as, e.g., reservoir depletion or movements of formation fluid interfaces. The use of such repeated surveys adds a time dimension to the data set, and accordingly it is often termed “Four-dimensional seismology” or “4D surveying”. In a typical marine survey, up to 20 streamer cables and one or more sources are towed behind a vessel. A typical streamer includes hundreds or even thousands of sensors positioned at spaced intervals along its length, which can range from 2 to 12 km. The various streamer cables are typically positioned from 25 to 150 meters apart and are preferably towed in a generally parallel relationship so as to collect survey data over a fairly uniform sampling grid.
When streamers and sources are towed through the water, they are subject to the effects of water currents that often tend to pull them from their desired paths. To combat this tendency, the streamers and sources are typically equipped with positioning devices such as those disclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,011,752; 6,144,342; 6,879,542; 6,985,403; 7,222,579; 7,423,929; 7,800,976. See also U.S. Pat. App. 2007/0247971 “Four dimensional seismic survey system and method” by inventors Semb and Karlsen. Wings and position-maintaining birds are typical examples of steering devices that are controllable to regulate the horizontal displacement of the sources or streamers relative to their desired paths. Such devices, while helpful for maintaining streamer positions, are also sources of sensor noise due to the turbulence they can generate when pushing or pulling the streamer back into position. (Such sensor noise levels can be readily measured by the system between source actuations.) Of course, the vessel itself is steerable and its path is also a factor in determining the source and streamer paths during the survey.
When conducting repeated surveys, any mismatch in the streamer paths makes it more difficult to accurately resolve differences between survey results. On the other hand, strict enforcement of streamer path matching is expected to require excessive use of streamer positioning devices, which in turn would raise the sensor noise level above the acceptable threshold.
A better understanding of the various disclosed embodiments can be obtained when the detailed description is considered in conjunction with the following drawings, in which:
While the invention is susceptible to various modifications, equivalents, and alternative forms, specific embodiments thereof are shown by way of example in the drawings and will herein be described in detail. It should be understood, however, that the drawings and detailed description thereto do not limit the disclosure, but on the contrary, they are examples of the modifications, equivalents, and alternatives that may fall within the scope of the appended claims.
The problems outlined in the background may be at least in part addressed by the disclosed 4D survey systems and methods. In at least some embodiments, a disclosed 4D survey method includes towing one or more sources and one or more streamers behind a vessel to acquire geophysical survey data, and determining steering signals for the source(s), the streamer(s), and/or the vessel. The steering signals minimize an error function having parameters that include: a data quality measure and a measure of a horizontal displacement of the one or more sources or the one or more streamers from their respective desired paths. The desired paths may be the paths that were followed in a base survey. Suitable data quality measures include a cross-correlation or other similarity measurement between newly acquired traces and traces from the base survey.
As the ship 100 tows the sources 112 and streamers 114 along a survey line, the sources generate seismic waves 116 that reflect from acoustic impedance contrasts such as those caused by boundaries 106 between subsurface structures. The reflected seismic waves may be picked up by the seismic sensors 114, digitized, and communicated to a recording and control system on the ship 100. The recording and control system controls the operation of the positioning devices, the sources, and the receivers, and it records the acquired data.
Each firing of the source results in a pattern of midpoints 502 associated with the trace signals. (The midpoint pattern for each firing is a half-scale replica of the receiver position pattern.) As the survey proceeds, the sources are fired repeatedly and the receivers acquire traces associated with a new set of midpoints that largely overlap previous midpoints. All of the depth-based signals associated with a given midpoint can be added or “stacked” to increase their signal-to-noise ratio and provide a more accurate picture of the subsurface structure at that point.
In four-dimensional seismology, a base survey is taken and is used for comparison with subsequent surveys of that region. For the comparisons to be as accurate as possible, it is desired to have the source and receiver positions for each of the traces (and hence the midpoint locations) in the subsequent surveys correspond closely to those of the base survey. Obstacles to this ideal include the prevailing water currents as well as incidental effects of turbulence and inaccuracies in the operation of the positioning devices.
The midpoint mismatches can be expressed in terms of an in-line position error (measured parallel to the x-axis) and a cross-line position error (measured parallel to the y-axis). The in-line position error is primarily a function of the source firing times and is substantially independent of any operations by the positioning devices. Moreover, the sensors are usually more densely spaced in the in-line direction than in the cross-line direction, meaning that trace interpolation in the in-line direction is usually an adequate remedy for any in-line position errors. As such, in-line positioning errors will be largely neglected in the following discussion.
A processing device (such as, e.g., the general purpose processing system 308 in
A data quality component 724 may measure sensor noise levels, e.g., by examining trace signals during quiet periods before or after the geophysical signal energy impinges on the sensors. Alternatively, the data quality component 724 may compare the trace signals from the current firing with the corresponding trace signals from the base survey. Various suitable forms exist for the comparison. In some embodiments, a cross-correlation coefficient is used to measure how well the base survey and current survey trace signals match. Where bi represents a sampled trace signal from the base survey, ai represents a sampled trace signal from the current survey, and τ represents a time shift or depth shift, the cross-correlation coefficient c(τ) is expressible as:
When the sampled trace signals are functions of depth, equation (1) provides a spatial cross-correlation coefficient, whereas for time-based trace signals equation (1) provides a temporal cross-correlation coefficient. Either may be used at the option of the system designer. The cross-correlation coefficient at τ=0 is one measure of the similarity between the traces, but more commonly the maximum cross-correlation coefficient value is used. The time shift or depth shift τm that yields the maximum value can also be used as a measure of the traces' similarity. If the analysis is performed in the frequency domain, the similarity measure may be the phase rotation exp(jωτm), which corresponds to the time or depth shift τm. An alternative similarity measure is the semblance between the base survey trace and the current survey trace:
The data quality component 724 can alternatively employ other similarity measures, such as the root mean square error
(If, as is often the case, the sampled trace signals ai and bi have been normalized, equation (3) results in the normalized root mean square error, which is another suitable similarity measure.) These similarity measures are illustrative examples and not limiting to the scope of the disclosure. For each trace, the data quality component 724 produces a measure of the mismatch between that trace and the corresponding trace from the subsequent survey.
A horizontal displacement error can be derived based on the similarities between the current survey trace and a set of base survey traces around the most probable location of the midpoint for the current survey trace. The horizontal displacement error can be found as the distance between the midpoints for the current survey trace and the most similar base survey trace. The lateral control of the vessel, source(s), and streamers can be based on the similarity measures or on the horizontal displacement errors derived from the similarity measures. If the system just measures the similarity between each current survey trace and one corresponding base survey trace, it may be termed a “single point based system”. If the system measures the similarity between a group of current survey traces and a group of base survey traces (perhaps as a prelude to deriving the horizontal displacement error), it may be termed a “patch-based system”.
A steering controller 726 operates on the position errors and the mismatch errors derived for each trace or on the horizontal displacement errors and produces steering signals for each of the positioning devices. One illustrative embodiment for the steering controller in a single point based system provides steering signals sk by filtering the position error signals et and the data quality values qt:
In equation (4), k is the steering signal index that indicates which positioning device the steering signal controls; i is the time index; t is the trace index which is drawn from the set of traces T that are affected by positioning device k; vk,n and wk,n are the filter coefficients for the data quality values qt and position error signals et, respectively; and uk,t is a weight factor that determines how much trace t influences steering signal sk. The filter coefficients in this embodiment can be made adaptive so that the acquired trace data minimizes error functions defined by the summed squares of the data quality values qt and position error signals et:
Many suitable adaptation algorithms exist, including the least-mean-square adaptation algorithm which adapts the filter coefficients wk,n in accordance with the equation
where μ is an adaptation step size that is chosen to balance system stability against the rate of adaptation. The equation for adapting the filter coefficients vk,n is similar.
More details on the least-mean-square adaptation algorithm and other suitable adaptation algorithms can be found in textbooks on adaptive filter design.
With this understanding, we now turn to
In block 808, the system determines the cross-line position errors between the respective midpoints of the base and subsequent surveys. In block 810, a single-point based system determines the data quality measure by measuring the similarity between the respective signals of the base and subsequent surveys. A patch-based system may derive a horizontal displacement error by, for example, determining the cross-correlation peak or other similarity measure indicating the best-matching group of base survey traces for the recently acquired group of traces. Then the displacement error is extracted as the distance between the midpoint for the base survey traces yielding the correlation peak and the midpoint of the recently acquired traces.
In block 812, the single-point based system operates on the position errors and the data quality measures to generate steering signals for one or more of the vessel, the sources, and the streamer positioning devices. The patch-based system may use the horizontal displacement error weighted with a corresponding uncertainty/quality measure that, for example, could be extracted from the cross-correlation information as the width of the cross-correlation peak. Optimal weighting strategies would also account for the measuring uncertainty of the various position sensing devices. An optional block 814 represents the system's dynamic adaptation of the steering generator coefficients to minimize the error functions of equation (5). If a non-adaptive system embodiment is chosen, the coefficients can be programmed on the basis of a modeled system and can be similarly chosen to minimize an error function that includes both position error and data quality as parameters. In each case the error functions are a representation of the system's performance and the minimization of the error functions corresponds to an optimal system performance.
Numerous equivalents, variations and modifications will become apparent to those skilled in the art once the above disclosure is fully appreciated. For example, the ready translation from source and receiver positions to midpoint positions means that either can be used to measure cross-line position errors. The data quality measure need not be limited to two corresponding traces—rather each newly acquired trace may be compared with an average of a group of traces around the location associated with the newly acquired trace. The survey system need not be limited to a single vessel, and in some embodiments the sources may be towed by one or more vessels other than the vessel towing the streamer array. The following claims should be interpreted to embrace all such equivalents, variations and modifications.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3832762 | Johnston | Sep 1974 | A |
4481611 | Burrage | Nov 1984 | A |
4617518 | Srnka | Oct 1986 | A |
5723790 | Andersson | Mar 1998 | A |
5790472 | Workman et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5955884 | Payton et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
6011752 | Ambs et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6144342 | Bertheas et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6438069 | Ross et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6684160 | Ozbek et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6788618 | Clayton et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6873571 | Clayton et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6879542 | Didier et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6901028 | Clayton et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6985403 | Nicholson | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7116036 | Balasubramaniam et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7222579 | Hillesund et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7298672 | Tenghamn et al. | Nov 2007 | B1 |
7331803 | Steigerwald | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7376045 | Falkenberg et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7423929 | Olivier | Sep 2008 | B1 |
7642784 | Reddig et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7667375 | Berkcan | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7671598 | Ronaess et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7800976 | Stokkeland et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
20050194201 | Tenghamn et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20070230721 | White | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070247971 | Semb et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20090310439 | Hauan et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100118645 | Welker | May 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2005096018 | Oct 2005 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Seeger, Joseph I., et al., “Sense Finger Dynamics in a ΣΔ Force-Feedback Gyroscope”, Technical Digest of the Solid-State Sensor and Actuator Workshop, (Jun. 2000), pp. 296-299, Hilton Head Island, SC. |
Chandrakasan, Anantha et al., “Trends in Low Power Digital Signal Processing”, Proceedings of IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems, (1998), pp. 604-607, vol. 4, Monterey, CA (USA). |
Mitcheson, P.D. et al., “MEMS Electrostatic Micropower Generator for Low Frequency Operation”, Sensors and Actuators A, (2004), pp. 523-529, vol. 115. |
Ergen, Sinem C., “Zigbee/IEEE 802.15.4 Summary”, Advanced Technology Lab of National Semiconductor, (Sep. 4, 2004), 37 pgs. |
Lewis, Christopher P., et al., “Simulation of Micromachined Digital Accelerometer in SIMULINK and PSPICE”, UKACC International Conference on Control, (Sep. 1996), pp. 205-209, vol. 1, Conf. Publ. No. 427. |
Taner, Turhan (Tury) M., “Semblance and Other Similarity Measurements”, (Nov. 1996),6 pgs. |
Lee, Haksue et al., “A Micro-Machined Piezoelectric Flexural-Mode Hydrophone with Air Backing: Benefit of Air Backing for Enhancing Sensitivity”, J. Acoustical Society of America, vol. 128, No. 3, Sep. 2010, pp. 1033-1044. |
Choi, Sungjoon et al., “A Micro-Machined Piezoelectric Flexural-Mode Hydrophone with Air Backing: A Hydrostatic Pressure-Balancing Mechanism for Integrity Preservation”, J. Acoustical Society of America, vol. 128, No. 3, Sep. 2010, pp. 1021-1032. |
Smith, Paddy “It's All Acquisition's Fault”, Advanced Time-Lapse Seismic Acquisition Improves Quality and Delivers Results More Quickly, 4-D Seismic, EPmag.com (Mar. 2011), pp. 49-51. |
Rickert, William T., et al., “Systems and Methods for Wireless Communication in a Geophysical Survey Streamer”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/073,832, filed Mar. 28, 2011. |
Tenghamn, Stig Rune L., “Systems and Methods for Energy Harvesting in a Geophysical Survey Streamer”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/073,823, filed Mar. 28, 2011. |
Tenghamn, Stig Rune L., et al., “Digital Sensor Streamers and Applications Thereof”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/206,002, filed Aug. 9, 2011. |
Barr, Frederick J., et al., “Piezoelectric Sensors for Geophysical Streamers”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/209,909, filed Aug. 15, 2011. |
Barr, Frederick J., et al., “An Electrostatically Coupled Pressure Sensor”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/209,940, filed Aug. 15, 2011. |
United Kingdom Search Report for Application No. GB1214670.0, dated: Dec. 3, 2012. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20130051175 A1 | Feb 2013 | US |