The applicants hereby claim the priority under 35 USC 119(a) of International Application PCT/US2003/030868, filed Sept. 30, 2003 and was published in accordance with PCT Article 21(2) on May 6, 2005 in English.
This invention relates to a technique for controlling traffic in a Wireless Local Area Network (LAN) to achieve a desired Quality of Service (QoS) level/service level.
Advances in the field of wireless LAN technology have resulted in the emergence of publicly accessible wireless LANs (e.g., “hot spots”) at rest stops, cafes, libraries and similar public facilities. Presently, wireless LANs offer mobile terminal users access to a private data network, such as a Corporate Intranet, or a public data network such as the Internet. The relatively low cost to implement and operate a wireless LAN, as well as the available high bandwidth (usually in excess of 10 Megabits/second) makes the wireless LAN an ideal access mechanism through which the mobile terminal user can exchange packets with an external entity.
A mobile terminal user accessing a wireless LAN can send and receive traffic having different QoS levels/service levels. For example, a mobile terminal user could send voice traffic, which has greater sensitivity to latency delays than data. Different types of data can have different QoS level/service level requirements. For example, streaming video typically requires far greater bandwidth than simple text messages. Present day Wireless LANs typically provide limited QoS levels/service levels. For example, an optional feature of the IEEE 802.11 protocol standard utilized by many wireless LANs requires polling of each user by an associated Wireless LAN Access Point (AP) in order to grant user access, thus permitting implementation of one or more limited QoS level/service level control schemes. With the ETSI/Hipperlan2 standard, the wireless LAN utilizes the Medium Access Control (MAC) protocol to provide a connection-oriented mechanism whereby each mobile terminal user can establish a communications session with the AP and negotiate for radio resources to obtain a desired QoS levevservice level. However, such present day schemes for controlling QoS levels/service levels only address management of the radio resources of a given AP. Such schemes do not address the management of resources within a wired network associated with the wireless LAN.
Thus, there is a need for a technique for managing QoS levels within a wired network associated with a wireless LAN.
Briefly, in accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present principles, there is provided a method for controlling Quality of Service (QoS) levels/service levels within a wired network associated with a wireless Local Area Network (LAN). The method commences upon the receipt in the network of at least one frame of information from a mobile terminal user. A determination is then made regarding the appropriate QoS level/service level for that information frame. The QoS level/service level for the frame can be established in accordance with the source of the frame (i.e., the identity of the sending mobile terminal user). Alternatively, the mobile user can request a specific QoS level/service level for an upcoming communication session on a dynamic basis. Once the QoS level for the frame is determined, then an identifier, typically in the form of a Virtual Local Area Network (VLAN) number, is associated with the frame to designate the required QoS level/service level. Normally, the VLAN number designates the identity of the network end-point destined to receive the frame in accordance with the IEEE 802.1Q standard. However, in accordance with present principles, the VLAN number is used in the network to select the appropriate path associated with a QoS level. The frame is routed in the network in accordance with the VLAN number associated with the frame.
An Inter-Working Gateway (IWG) 18 provides a communications path between the wired network 16 and an external network 20 which can include a private data network, a corporate intranet or a public data network such as the Internet, or a combination thereof. The IWG 18 not only interworks the wired network 16 and the external network 20, but also performs Authorization, Authentication and Accounting (AAA) functions. In other words, the IWG 18 serves to authorize the MTU 14 to obtain service, as well as to authenticate the MTU upon each access to the wireless LAN 10. Further, after authenticating the MTU 14, the IWG 18 accounts for the service rendered to the MTU for billing purposes.
The IWG 18 provides limited QoS level/service level management within the prior art Wireless LAN 10. At best, the IWG 18 can control each of APs 121 and 122 to provide the radio resources needed to achieve a prescribed QoS level/service level for traffic exchanged between each AP and associated MTU. However, the wired network 16 inside of the wireless LAN 10 typically uses the default Medium Access Protocol (MAC), which in turn, employs Carrier Sense Multiple Access (CSMA), which does not allow for QoS level management. At best, bandwidth is shared among all contenders and the service level is said to be best effort.
At the heart of the wireless LAN 100 is a wired network in the form of an Ethernet Switch 160 having Virtual Local Area Network (VLAN) capability, that is the ability to route each information frame in accordance with an identifier (i.e., a VLAN number) associated with the frame. The VLAN switch 160 controls the traffic flow between each of the APs 1201 and 1202 and one of a set of routing Inter-Working Gateways (IWGs), exemplified by IWGs 1801, 1802 and 1803, in accordance with a determined QoS level. As depicted in
In addition to the routing IWGs 801-1803, the wireless LAN 100 of
Rather than rely on a static QoS level/service set during initiation of a communications session with the wireless LAN 100, each MTU could request a particular QoS level/service level for a new upcoming session on a dynamic basis. Stated another way, an MTU, such as MTU 1404, could send a request that one or more subsequently transmitted frames should be accorded a particular QoS level/service level. The AP 1202 forwards such a QoS level/service level request to the administrative IWG 1804, which in turn, instructs the AP to assign such frames a VLAN number that designates the requested QoS levevservice level.
The VLAN switch 160 in the wireless LAN 100 of
As mentioned previously, the originating MTU (i.e., MTU 1402 in
The interfaces 1821-1823 typically each have different QoS level/service level parameters (e.g., for example different bandwidth). Upon receipt of an information frame from a particular AP, such as AP 1201 of
The foregoing describes a technique for controlling Quality of Service (QoS) levels/services in a wired network associated with a wireless LAN by routing the traffic pursuant to an identifier associated traffic that designates the QoS level/service level.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/US03/30868 | 9/30/2003 | WO | 00 | 3/23/2006 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2005/041446 | 5/6/2005 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5267232 | Katsube et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5371731 | Pratt et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5694390 | Yamato et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5787080 | Hulyalkar et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
6094431 | Yamato et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6175569 | Ellington et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6366581 | Jepsen | Apr 2002 | B1 |
H2051 | Zhu et al. | Nov 2002 | H |
6567396 | Pohjanvouri et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6694369 | Vepa et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6775283 | Williams | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6944159 | Fotedar et al. | Sep 2005 | B1 |
6947739 | Yokoyama | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6980549 | Shabtay et al. | Dec 2005 | B1 |
7031341 | Yu | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7079508 | Ayyagari et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7088714 | Athreya et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7133420 | Chang et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7164656 | Foster et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7173935 | Lou et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7283561 | Picher-Dempsey | Oct 2007 | B1 |
7293094 | Vaman et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7324517 | Sundaresan et al. | Jan 2008 | B1 |
7370105 | Lebourg et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7376191 | Melick et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7376828 | Voit et al. | May 2008 | B1 |
7415003 | Ogura et al. | Aug 2008 | B1 |
7417995 | Rabie et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7428216 | Siddiqui et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
20020022483 | Thompson et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020027906 | Athreya et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020037010 | Yamauchi | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020055990 | Vaman et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020067729 | Fukuda et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020101870 | Chase et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020119783 | Bourlas et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020150041 | Reinshmidt et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020191572 | Weinstein et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030035398 | Sato | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030055968 | Hochmuth et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030087629 | Juitt et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030095554 | Shimizu | May 2003 | A1 |
20030103520 | Chen et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030227373 | Lou et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040032868 | Oda et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040095889 | Chang et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20050066166 | Chin et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050174943 | Wang | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20070058535 | Bichot et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20080056295 | Loda et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080285574 | Teener | Nov 2008 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2001044968 | Jul 2001 | JP |
2002252633 | Sep 2002 | JP |
2003158539 | May 2003 | JP |
2003249947 | May 2003 | JP |
2003-244185 | Aug 2003 | JP |
2003273893 | Sep 2003 | JP |
WO9736405 | Oct 1997 | WO |
WO0013436 | Mar 2000 | WO |
WO0163849 | Aug 2001 | WO |
WO0230056 | Apr 2002 | WO |
WO03048957 | Jun 2003 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Search Report Dated Jan. 8, 2004. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20070058535 A1 | Mar 2007 | US |