Quantum controller architecture

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 11942947
  • Patent Number
    11,942,947
  • Date Filed
    Wednesday, April 26, 2023
    a year ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, March 26, 2024
    a month ago
Abstract
A system comprises pulse generation and measurement circuitry comprising a plurality of pulse generator circuits and a plurality of ports, and management circuitry. The management circuitry is operable to analyze a specification of a controlled system and controlled elements that comprises a definition of a controlled element of the control system, and a definition of one or more pulses available for transmission by the control system. The management circuitry is operable to configure, based on the specification, the pulse generation and measurement circuitry to: generate the one or more pulses via one or more of the plurality of pulse generator circuits; and output the one or more pulses to the controlled element via one or more of the plurality of ports.
Description
BACKGROUND

Limitations and disadvantages of conventional approaches to quantum computer control systems will become apparent to one of skill in the art, through comparison of such approaches with some aspects of the present method and system set forth in the remainder of this disclosure with reference to the drawings.


BRIEF SUMMARY

Methods and systems are provided for a quantum controller, substantially as illustrated by and/or described in connection with at least one of the figures, as set forth more completely in the claims.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIGS. 1A and 1B compare some aspects of classical (binary) computing and quantum computing.



FIG. 2 shows an example quantum orchestration platform.



FIG. 3A shows an example quantum orchestration platform (QOP) architecture in accordance with various example implementations of this disclosure.



FIG. 3B shows an example implementation of the quantum controller circuitry of FIG. 3A.



FIG. 4 shows an example implementation of the pulser of FIG. 3B.



FIG. 5 shows an example implementation of the pulse operations manager and pulse operations circuitry of FIG. 3B.



FIG. 6A shows frequency generation circuitry of the quantum controller of FIG. 3B.



FIG. 6B shows example components of the control signal IF1 of FIG. 6A.



FIG. 7 shows an example implementation of the digital manager of FIG. 3B.



FIG. 8 shows an example implementation of the digital manager of FIG. 3B.



FIG. 9 illustrates configuration and control of the quantum controller via the quantum programming subsystem.



FIGS. 10A-10C show an example quantum machine specification.



FIG. 11 is a flow chart showing an example operation of the QOP.



FIG. 12A shows a portion of a quantum machine configured to perform a Power Rabi calibration.



FIG. 12B shows the result of a Power Rabi calibration.



FIGS. 13A and 13B illustrate the modular and reconfigurable nature of the QOP.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

Classical computers operate by storing information in the form of binary digits (“bits”) and processing those bits via binary logic gates. At any given time, each bit takes on only one of two discrete values: 0 (or “off”) and 1 (or “on”). The logical operations performed by the binary logic gates are defined by Boolean algebra and circuit behavior is governed by classical physics. In a modern classical system, the circuits for storing the bits and realizing the logical operations are usually made from electrical wires that can carry two different voltages, representing the 0 and 1 of the bit, and transistor-based logic gates that perform the Boolean logic operations.


Shown in FIG. 1A is a simple example of a classical computer configured to a bit 102 and apply a single logic operation 104 to the bit 102. At time t0 the bit 102 is in a first state, at time t1 the logic operation 104 is applied to the bit 102, and at time t2 the bit 102 is in a second state determined by the state at time t0 and the logic operation. So, for example, the bit 102 may typically be stored as a voltage (e.g., 1 Vdc for a “1” or 0 Vdc for a “0”) which is applied to an input of the logic operation 104 (comprised of one or more transistors). The output of the logic gate is then either 1Vdc or 0Vdc, depending on the logic operation performed.


Obviously, a classical computer with a single bit and single logic gate is of limited use, which is why modern classical computers with even modest computation power contain billions of bits and transistors. That is to say, classical computers that can solve increasingly complex problems inevitably require increasingly large numbers of bits and transistors and/or increasingly long amounts of time for carrying out the algorithms. There are, however, some problems which would require an infeasibly large number of transistors and/or infeasibly long amount of time to arrive at a solution. Such problems are referred to as intractable.


Quantum computers operate by storing information in the form of quantum bits (“qubits”) and processing those qubits via quantum gates. Unlike a bit which can only be in one state (either 0 or 1) at any given time, a qubit can be in a superposition of the two states at the same time. More precisely, a quantum bit is a system whose state lives in a two dimensional Hilbert space and is therefore described as a linear combination α|0custom character+β|1custom character, where |0custom character and |1custom character are two basis states, and a and β are complex numbers, usually called probability amplitudes, which satisfy |α|2+|β|2=1. Using this notation, when the qubit is measured, it will be 0 with probability |α|2 and will be 1 with probability |β|2. |0custom character and |1custom character can also be represented by two-dimensional basis vectors






[



1




0



]





and







[



0




1



]

,





respectively, and then the qubit state is represented by







[



α




β



]

.





The operations performed by the quantum gates are defined by linear algebra over Hilbert space and circuit behavior is governed by quantum physics. This extra richness in the mathematical behavior of qubits and the operations on them, enables quantum computers to solve some problems much faster than classical computers (in fact some problems that are intractable for classical computers may become trivial for quantum computers).


Shown in FIG. 1B is a simple example of a quantum computer configured to store a qubit 122 and apply a single quantum gate operation 124 to the qubit 122. At time t0 the qubit 122 is described by α1|0custom character1|1custom character, at time t1 the logic operation 104 is applied to the qubit 122, and at time t2 the qubits 122 is described by α2|0custom character2|1custom character.


Unlike a classical bit, a qubit cannot be stored as a single voltage value on a wire. Instead, a qubit is physically realized using a two-level quantum mechanical system. Many physical implementations of qubits have been proposed and developed over the years with some being more promising than others. Some examples of leading qubits implementations include superconducting circuits, spin qubits, and trapped ions.


It is the job of the quantum controller to generate the precise series of external signals, usually pulses of electromagnetic waves and pulses of base band voltage, to perform the desired logic operations (and thus carry out the desired quantum algorithm). Example implementations of a quantum controller are described in further detail below.



FIG. 2 shows an example quantum orchestration platform (QOP). The system comprises a quantum programming subsystem 202, a quantum controller 210, and a quantum processor 218.


The quantum programming subsystem 202 comprises circuitry operable to generate a quantum algorithm description 206 which configures the quantum controller 210 and includes instructions the quantum controller 210 can execute to carry out the quantum algorithm (i.e., generate the necessary outbound quantum control pulse(s) 213) with little or no human intervention during runtime. In an example implementation, the quantum programming system 202 is a personal computer comprising a processor, memory, and other associated circuitry (e.g., an x86 or x64 chipset) having installed on it a quantum orchestration software development kit (SDK) that enables creation (e.g., by a user via a text editor, integrated development environment (IDE), and/or by automated quantum algorithm description generation circuitry) of a high-level (as opposed to binary or “machine code”) quantum algorithm description 206. In an example implementation, the high-level quantum algorithm description uses a high-level programming language (e.g., Python, R, Java, Matlab, etc.) simply as a “host” programming language in which are embedded the QOP programming constructs.


The high-level quantum algorithm description may comprise a specification (an example of which is shown in FIGS. 10A-10C) and a program (an example program for a Power Rabi calibration is discussed below). Although the specification and program may be part of one or more larger databases and/or contained in one or more files, and one or more formats, the remainder of this disclosure will, for simplicity of description, assume the configuration data structure and the program data structure each takes the form of a plain-text file recognizable by an operating system (e.g., windows, Linux, Mac, or another OS) on which quantum programming subsystem runs. The quantum programming subsystem 202 then compiles the high-level quantum algorithm description 206 to a machine code version of the quantum algorithm description 206 (i.e., series of binary vectors that represent instructions that the quantum controller's hardware can interpret and execute directly). An example implementation of the data structures/vectors used for realizing the machine code version of the quantum algorithm description are described below.


The quantum programming subsystem 202 is coupled to the quantum controller 210 via interconnect 204 which may, for example, utilize universal serial bus (USB), peripheral component interconnect (PCIe) bus, wired or wireless Ethernet, or any other suitable communication protocol. The quantum controller 210 comprises circuitry operable to load the machine code quantum algorithm description 206 from the programming subsystem 202 via interconnect 204. Then, execution of the machine code by the quantum controller 210 causes the quantum controller 210 to generate the necessary outbound quantum control pulse(s) 213 that correspond to the desired operations to be performed on the quantum processor 218 (e.g., sent to qubit(s) for manipulating a state of the qubit(s) or to readout resonator(s) for reading the state of the qubit(s), etc.). Depending on the quantum algorithm to be performed, outbound pulse(s) 213 for carrying out the algorithm may be predetermined at design time and/or may need to be determined during runtime. The runtime determination of the pulses may comprise performance of classical calculations and processing in the quantum controller 210 and/or the quantum programing subsystem 202 during runtime of the algorithm (e.g., runtime analysis of inbound pulses 215 received from the quantum processor 218).


During runtime and/or upon completion of a quantum algorithm performed by the quantum controller 210, the quantum controller 210 may output data/results 208 to the quantum programming subsystem 202. In an example implementation these results may be used to generate a new quantum algorithm description 206 for a subsequent run of the quantum algorithm and/or update the quantum algorithm description during runtime.


The quantum controller 210 is coupled to the quantum processor 218 via interconnect 212 which may comprise, for example, one or more conductors and/or optical fibers. The quantum controller 210 may comprise a plurality of interconnected, but physically distinct quantum control modules (e.g., each module being a desktop or rack mounted device) such that quantum control systems requiring relatively fewer resources can be realized with relatively fewer quantum control modules and quantum control systems requiring relatively more resources can be realized with relatively more quantum control modules.


The quantum processor 218 comprises K (an integer) quantum elements 122, which includes qubits (which could be of any type such as superconducting, spin qubits, ion trapped, etc.), and, where applicable, any other element(s) for processing quantum information, storing quantum information (e.g. storage resonator), and/or coupling the outbound quantum control pulses 213 and inbound quantum control pulses 215 between interconnect 212 and the quantum element(s) 122 (e.g., readout resonator(s)). In an example implementation in which the quantum processor comprises readout resonators (or other readout circuitry), K may be equal to the total number of qubits plus the number of readout circuits. That is, if each of Q (an integer) qubits of the quantum processor 218 is associated with a dedicated readout circuit, then K may be equal to 2Q. For ease of description, the remainder of this disclosure will assume such an implementation, but it need not be the case in all implementations. Other elements of the quantum processor 218 may include, for example, flux lines (electronic lines for carrying current), gate electrodes (electrodes for voltage gating), current/voltage lines, amplifiers, classical logic circuits residing on-chip in the quantum processor 218, and/or the like.



FIG. 3A shows an example quantum controller architecture in accordance with various example implementations of this disclosure. The quantum controller 210 comprises L (an integer ≥1) pulser circuits 3020-302L−1 and shared circuitry 310.


In the example implementation shown, each pulser circuit 302l (l an integer between 0 and L−1) comprises circuitry for exchanging information over signal paths 304l, 306l, and 308l, where the signal path 308l carries outbound pulses (e.g., 213 of FIG. 2) generated by the pulser circuit 302, (which may be, for example, control pulses sent to the quantum processor 218 to manipulate one or more properties of one or more quantum elements—e.g., manipulate a state of one or more qubits, manipulate a frequency of a qubit using flux biasing, etc., and/or readout a state of one or more quantum elements), the signal path 306l carries inbound quantum element readout pulses (e.g., 215 of FIG. 2) to be processed by the pulser circuit 302l, and signal path 304, carries control information. Each signal path may comprise one or more conductors, optical channels, and/or wireless channels.


Each pulser circuit 302, comprises circuitry operable to generate outbound pulses on signal path 308, according to quantum control operations to be performed on the quantum processor 218. This involves very precisely controlling characteristics such as phase, frequency, amplitude, and timing of the outbound pulses. The characteristics of an outbound pulse generated at any particular time may be determined, at least in part, on inbound pulses received from the quantum processor 218 (via shared circuitry 310 and signal path 306l) at a prior time. In an example implementation, the time required to close the feedback loop (i.e., time from receiving a first pulse on one or more of paths 3151-315L (e.g., at an analog to digital converter of the path) to sending a second pulse on one or more of paths 3130-313L−1 (e.g., at an output of a digital-to-analog converter of the path), where the second pulse is based on the first pulse, is significantly less than the coherence time of the qubits of the quantum processor 218. For example, the time to close the feedback loop may be on the order of 100 nanoseconds. It should be noted that each signal path in FIG. 3A may in practice be a set of signal paths for supporting generation of multi-pulse sets (e.g., two signal paths for two-pulse pairs, three signal paths for three-pulse sets, and so on).


In the example implementation shown, the shared circuitry 310 comprises circuitry for exchanging information with the pulser circuits 3020-302L−1 over signal paths 3040-304L−1, 3060-306L−1, and 3080-308L−1, where each signal path 308, carries outbound pulses generated by the pulser circuit 302l, each signal path 306, carries inbound pulses to be processed by pulser circuit 302l, and each signal path 304l carries control information such as flag/status signals, data read from memory, data to be stored in memory, data streamed to/from the quantum programming subsystem 202, and data to be exchanged between two or more pulsers 3020-302L. Similarly, in the example shown the shared circuitry 310 comprises circuitry for exchanging information with the quantum processor 218 over signal paths 3150-315M−1 and 3131-313K−1, where each signal path 315m (m an integer between 0 and M−1) carries inbound pulses from the quantum processor 218, and each signal path 313k (k an integer between 0 and K−1) carries outbound pulses to the quantum processor 218. Additionally, in the example shown the shared circuitry 310 comprises circuitry for exchanging information with the quantum programming subsystem over signal path 311. The shared circuitry 310 may be: integrated with the quantum controller 210 (e.g., residing on one or more of the same field programmable gate arrays or application specific integrated circuits or printed circuit boards); external to the quantum controller (e.g., on a separate FPGA, ASIC, or PCB connected to the quantum controller via one or more cables, backplanes, or other devices connected to the quantum processor 218, etc.); or partially integrated with the quantum controller 210 and partially external to the quantum controller 210.


In various implementations, M may be less than, equal to, or greater than L, K may be less than, equal to, or greater than L, and M may be less than, equal to, or greater than K. For example, the nature of some quantum algorithms is such that not all K quantum elements need to be driven at the same time. For such algorithms, L may be less than K and one or more of the L pulsers 302l may be shared among multiple of the K quantum elements circuits. That is, any pulser 302l may generate pulses for different quantum elements at different times. This ability of a pulser 302l to generate pulses for different quantum elements at different times can reduce the number of pulsers 3020-302L−1 (i.e., reduce L) required to support a given number of quantum elements (thus saving significant resources, cost, size, overhead when scaling to larger numbers of qubits, etc.).


The ability of a pulser 302l to generate pulses for different quantum elements at different times also enables reduced latency. As just one example, assume a quantum algorithm which needs to send a pulse to quantum element 1220 at time T1, but whether the pulse is to be of a first type or second type (e.g., either an X pulse or a Hadamard pulse) cannot be determined until after processing an inbound readout pulse at time T1-DT (i.e., DT time intervals before the pulse is to be output). If there were a fixed assignment of pulsers 3020-302L−1 to quantum elements of the quantum processor 218 (i.e., if 3020 could only send pulses to quantum element 1220, and pulser 302l could only send pulses to quantum element 1221, and so on), then pulser 3020 might not be able to start generating the pulse until it determined what the type was to be. In the depicted example implementation, on the other hand, pulser 3020 can start generating the first type pulse and pulser 302l can start generating the second type pulse and then either of the two pulses can be released as soon as the necessary type is determined. Thus, if the time to generate the pulse is Tlat, in this example the example quantum controller 210 may reduce latency of outputting the pulse by Tlat.


The shared circuitry 310 is thus operable to receive pulses via any one or more of the signals paths 3080-308L−1 and/or 3150-315M−1, process the received pulses as necessary for carrying out a quantum algorithm, and then output the resulting processed pulses via any one or more of the signal paths 3060-306L−1 and/or 3130-313K−1. The processing of the pulses may take place in the digital domain and/or the analog domain. The processing may comprise, for example: frequency translation/modulation, phase translation/modulation, frequency and/or time division multiplexing, time and/or frequency division demultiplexing, amplification, attenuation, filtering in the frequency domain and/or time domain, time-to-frequency-domain or frequency-to-time-domain conversion, upsampling, downsampling, and/or any other signal processing operation. At any given time, the decision as to from which signal path(s) to receive one or more pulse(s), and the decision as to onto which signal path(s) to output the pulse(s) may be: predetermined (at least in part) in the quantum algorithm description; and/or dynamically determined (at least in part) during runtime of the quantum algorithm based on classical programs/computations performed during runtime, which may involve processing of inbound pulses. As an example of predetermined pulse generation and routing, a quantum algorithm description may simply specify that a particular pulse with predetermined characteristics is to be sent to signal path 3131 at a predetermined time. As an example of dynamic pulse determination and routing, a quantum algorithm description may specify that an inbound readout pulse at time T−DT should be analyzed and its characteristics (e.g., phase, frequency, and/or amplitude) used to determine, for example, whether at time T pulser 302l should output a pulse to a first quantum element or to a second quantum element or to determine, for example, whether at time T pulser 302l should output a first pulse to a first quantum element or a second pulse to the first quantum element. In various implementations of the quantum controller 210, the shared circuitry 310 may perform various other functions instead of and/or in addition to those described above. In general, the shared circuitry 310 may perform functions that are desired to be performed outside of the individual pulser circuits 3020-302L−1. For example, a function may be desirable to implement in the shared circuitry 310 where the same function is needed by a number of pulser circuits from 3020-302L−1 and thus may be shared among these pulser circuits instead of redundantly being implemented inside each pulser circuit. As another example, a function may be desirable to implement in the shared circuitry 310 where the function is not needed by all pulser circuits 3020-302L−1 at the same time and/or on the same frequency and thus fewer than L circuits for implementing the function may be shared among the L pulser circuits 3020-302L−1 through time and/or frequency division multiplexing. As another example, a function may be desirable to implement in the shared circuitry 310 where the function involves making decisions based on inputs, outputs, and/or state of multiple of the L pulser circuits 3020-302L−1, or other circuits. Utilizing a centralized coordinator/decision maker in the shared circuitry 310 may have the benefit(s) of: (1) reducing pinout and complexity of the pulser circuits 3020-302L−1; and/or (2) reducing decision-making latency. Nevertheless, in some implementations, decisions affecting multiple pulser circuits 3020-302L−1 may be made by one or more of the pulser circuits 3020-302L−1 where the information necessary for making the decision can be communicated among pulser circuits within a suitable time frame (e.g., still allowing the feedback loop to be closed within the qubit coherence time) over a tolerable number of pins/traces.



FIG. 3B shows an example implementation of the quantum controller of FIG. 2. The example quantum controller shown comprises pulsers 3021-302L−1, receive analog frontend 350, input manager 352, digital manager 354, pulse operations manager 356, pulse operations 358, output manager 360, transmit analog frontend 362, data exchange 364, synchronization manager 366, and input/output (“I/O”) manager 368. Circuitry depicted in FIG. 3B other than pulser circuits 3020-302L−1 corresponds to an example implementation of the shared circuitry 310 of FIG. 3A.


The receive analog frontend 350 comprises circuitry operable to concurrently process up to M (an integer ≥1) analog inbound signals (RP′0-RP′M−1) received via signal paths 3150-315M−1 to generate up to M concurrent inbound signals (RP0-RPM−1) to be output to input manager 352 via one or more signal paths. Although there is shown to be M signals RP and M signals RP′, this need not be the case. Such processing may comprise, for example, analog-to-digital conversion, filtering, upconversion, downconversion, amplification, attenuation, time division multiplexing/demultiplexing, frequency division multiplexing/demultiplexing, and/or the like. In various implementations, M may be less than, equal to, or greater than L and M may be less than, equal to, or greater than K.


The input manager 352 comprises circuitry operable to route any one or more of signals (RP0-RPM−1) to any one or more of pulsers 3020-302L−1 (as signal(s) Al0-AlL−1) and/or to other circuits (e.g. as signal io_mgr to I/O manager 368). In an example implementation, the input manager 352 comprises one or more switch networks, multiplexers, and/or the like for dynamically reconfiguring which signals RP0-RPM−1 are routed to which pulsers 3020-302L−1. This may enable time division multiplexing multiple of the signals RP0-RPM−1 onto a single signal Ali and/or time division demultiplexing components (e.g., time slices) of a signal RPm onto multiple of the signals AI0-AlL−1. In an example implementation, the input manager 352 comprises one or more mixers and/or filters for frequency division multiplexing multiple of the signals RP0-RPM−1 onto a single signal All and/or frequency division demultiplexing components (e.g., frequency bands) of a signal RPm onto multiple of the signals AI0-AlL−1. The signal routing and multiplexing/demultiplexing functions performed by the input manager 352 enables: a particular pulser 302l to process different inbound pulses from different quantum elements at different times; a particular pulser 302l to process different inbound pulses from different quantum elements at the same time; and multiple of the pulsers 3020-302L−1 to processes the same inbound pulse at the same time. In the example implementation shown, routing of the signals RP0-RPM−1 among the inputs of the pulsers 3020-302L−1 is controlled by digital control signals in_slct0-in_slctL−1 from the pulsers 3020-302L−1. In another implementation, the input manager may be operable to autonomously determine the appropriate routing (e.g., where the quantum algorithm description includes instructions to be loaded into memory of, and executed by, the input manager 352). In the example implementation, the input manager 352 is operable to rout input signals RP0-RPM−1 to the I/O manager 368 (as signal(s) io_mgr), to be sent to the quantum programing subsystem 202. This routing may, for example, be controlled by signals from the digital manager 354. In an example implementation, for each input signal RPm there is a digital signal, streamm, from the digital manager 354 to the input manager 352 that controls whether RPm will be sent from the input manager 352 to the I/O manager 368 and from there to the quantum programing subsystem 202.


Each of the pulsers 3020-302L−1 is as described above with reference to FIG. 3A. In the example implementation shown, each pulser 302l is operable to generate raw outbound pulses CP′l (“raw” is used simply to denote that the pulse has not yet been processed by pulse operations circuitry 358) and digital control signals in_slctl, D_portl, Dl, out_slctl, ops_ctrll, ops_slctl, IFl, Fl, and dmod_scltl for carrying out quantum algorithms on the quantum processor 218, and resultsl for carrying intermediate and/or final results generated by the pulser 302, to the quantum programming subsystem 202. One or more of the pulsers 3020-302L−1 may receive and/or generate additional signals which are not shown in FIG. 3A for clarity of illustration. The raw outbound pulses CP′0-CP′L−1 are conveyed via signal paths 3080-308L−1 and the digital control signals are conveyed via signal paths 3040-304L−1. Each of the pulsers 302I is operable to receive inbound pulse signal Ali and signal f_dmodl. Pulser 302, may process the inbound signal All to determine the state of certain quantum element(s) in the quantum processor 218 and use this state information for making decisions such as, for example, which raw outbound pulse CP′l to generate next, when to generate it, and what control signals to generate to affect the characteristics of that raw outbound pulse appropriately. Pulser 302l may use the signal f_dmodl for determining how to process inbound pulse signal Ali. As an example, when pulser 302l needs to process an inbound signal Ali from quantum element 1223, it can send a dmod_sclt1 signal that directs pulse operations manager 356 to send, on f_dmod1, settings to be used for demodulation of an inbound signal Al1 from quantum element 1223 (e.g., the pulse operations manager 356 may send the value cos(ω3*TS*Tclk13), where ω3 is the frequency of quantum element 1223, TS is amount of time passed since the reference point, for instance the time at which quantum algorithm started running, and ϕ3 is the phase of the total frame rotation of quantum element 1223, i.e. the accumulated phase of all frame rotations since the reference point).


The pulse operations circuitry 358 is operable to process the raw outbound pulses CP′0-CP′L−1 to generate corresponding output outbound pulses CP0-CPL−1. This may comprise, for example, manipulating the amplitude, phase, and/or frequency of the raw pulse CP′I. The pulse operations circuitry 358 receives raw outbound pulses CP′0-CP′L−1 from pulsers 3020-302L−1, control signals ops_cnfg0-ops_cnfgL−1 from pulse operations manager 356, and ops_ctrl0-ops_ctrlL−1 from pulsers 3020-302L−1.


The control signal ops_cnfgI configures, at least in part, the pulse operations circuitry 358 such that each raw outbound pulse CP′I that passes through the pulse operations circuitry 358 has performed on it one or more operation(s) tailored for that particular pulse. To illustrate, denoting a raw outbound pulse from pulser 3023 at time T1 as CP′3,T1, then, at time T1 (or sometime before T1 to allow for latency, circuit setup, etc.), the digital control signal ops_cnfg3 (denoted ops_cnfg3,T1 for purposes of this example) provides the information (e.g., in the form of one or more matrix, as described below) as to what specific operations are to be performed on pulse CP′3,T1. Similarly, ops_cnfg4,T1 provides the information as to what specific operations are to be performed on pulse CP′4,T1, and ops_cnfg3,T2 provides the information as to what specific operations are to be performed on pulse CP′4,T1.


The control signal ops_ctrlI provides another way for the pulser 302I to configure how any particular pulse is processed in the pulse operations circuitry 358. This may enable the pulser 302I to, for example, provide information to the pulse operation circuitry 358 that does not need to pass through the pulse operation manager 356. For example, the pulser 302I may send matrix values calculated in real-time by the pulser 302, to be used by the pulse operation circuitry 358 to modify pulse CP′I. These matrix values arrive to the pulse operation circuitry 358 directly from the pulser 302I and do not need to be sent to the pulse operation manager first. Another example may be that the pulser 302I provides information to the pulse operation circuitry 358 to affect the operations themselves (e.g. the signal ops_ctrlI can choose among several different mathematical operations that can be performed on the pulse).


The pulse operations manager 356 comprises circuitry operable to configure the pulse operations circuitry 358 such that the pulse operations applied to each raw outbound pulse CP′I are tailored to that particular raw outbound pulse. To illustrate, denoting a first raw outbound pulse to be output during a first time interval T1 as CP′I,T1, and a second raw outbound pulse to be output during a second time interval T2 as CP′I,T2, then pulse operations circuitry 358 is operable to perform a first one or more operations on CP′I,T1 and a second one or more operations on CP′1,T2. The first one or more operations may be determined, at least in part, based on to which quantum element the pulse CP1,T1 is to be sent, and the second one or more operations may be determined, at least in part, based on to which quantum element the pulse CP1,T2 is to be sent. The determination of the first one or more operations and second one or more operations may be performed dynamically during runtime.


The transmit analog frontend 362 comprises circuitry operable to concurrently process up to K digital signals DOk to generate up to K concurrent analog signals AOk to be output to the quantum processor 218. Such processing may comprise, for example, digital-to-analog conversion, filtering, upconversion, downconversion, amplification, attenuation, time division multiplexing/demultiplexing, frequency division multiplexing/demultiplexing and/or the like. In an example implementation, each of the one or more of signal paths 3130-313K−1 (FIG. 3A) represents a respective portion of Tx analog frontend circuit 362 as well as a respective portion of interconnect 212 (FIG. 2) between the Tx analog frontend circuit 362 and the quantum processor 218. Although there is one-to-one correspondence between the number of DO signals and the number of AO signals in the example implementation described here, such does not need to be the case. In another example implementation, the analog frontend 362 is operable to map more (or fewer) signals DO to fewer (or more) signals AO. In an example implementation the transmit analog frontend 362 is operable to process digital signals DO0-DOK−1 as K independent outbound pulses, as K/2 two-pulse pairs, or process some of signals DO0-DOK−1 as independent outbound pulses and some signals DO0-DOK−1 as two-pulse pairs (at different times and/or concurrently.


The output manager 360 comprises circuitry operable to route any one or more of signals CP0-CPL−1 to any one or more of signal paths 3130-313K−1. As just one possible example, signal path 3130 may comprise a first path through the analog frontend 362 (e.g., a first mixer and DAC) that outputs AO0 and traces/wires of interconnect 212 that carry signal AO0; signal path 3131 may comprise a second path through the analog frontend 362 (e.g., a second mixer and DAC) that outputs AO1 and traces/wires of interconnect 212 that carry signal AO1, and so on. In an example implementation, the output manager 360 comprises one or more switch networks, multiplexers, and/or the like for dynamically reconfiguring which one or more signals CP0-CPL−1 are routed to which signal paths 3130-313K−1. This may enable time division multiplexing multiple of the signals CP0-CPL−1 onto a single signal path 313k and/or time division demultiplexing components (e.g., time slices) of a signal CPm onto multiple of the signal paths 3130-313K−1. In an example implementation, the output manager 360 comprises one or more mixers and/or filters for frequency division multiplexing multiple of the signals CP0-CPM−1 onto a single signal path 313k and/or frequency division demultiplexing components (e.g., frequency bands) of a signal CPm onto multiple of the signal paths 3130-313K−1. The signal routing and multiplexing/demultiplexing functions performed by the output manager 360 enables: routing outbound pulses from a particular pulser 302I to different ones of the signal paths 3130-313K−1 at different times; routing outbound pulses from a particular pulser 302I to multiple of the signal paths 3130-313K−1 at the same time; and multiple of the pulsers 3020-302L−1 generating pulses for the same signal path 313k at the same time. In the example implementation shown, routing of the signals CP0-CPL−1 among the signal paths 3130-313K−1 is controlled by digital control signals out_slct0-out_slctL−1 from the pulsers 3020-302L−1. In another implementation, the output manager 360 may be operable to autonomously determine the appropriate routing (e.g., where the quantum algorithm description includes instructions to be loaded into memory of, and executed by, the output manager 360). In an example implementation, at any given time, the output manager 360 is operable to concurrently route K of the digital signals CP0-CPL−1 as K independent outbound pulses, concurrently route K/2 of the digital signals CP0-CPL−1 as two-pulse pairs, or route some of signals CP0-CPL−1 as independent outbound pulses and some others of the signals CP0-CPL−1 as multi-pulse sets (at different times and/or concurrently).


The digital manager 354 comprises circuitry operable to process and/or route digital control signals (DigCtrl0-DigCtrlJ−1) to various circuits of the quantum controller 210 and/or external circuits coupled to the quantum controller 210. In the example implementation shown, the digital manager receives, from each pulser 302l, (e.g., via one or more of signal paths 3040-304N−1) a digital signal Di that is to be processed and routed by the digital manager 354, and a control signal D_portI that indicates to which output port(s) of the digital manager 354 the signal DI should be routed. The digital control signals may be routed to, for example, any one or more of circuits shown in FIG. 3B, switches/gates which connect and disconnect the outputs AO0-AOK−1 from the quantum processor 218, external circuits coupled to the quantum controller 210 such as microwave mixers and amplifiers, and/or any other circuitry which can benefit from on real-time information from the pulser circuits 3020-302L−1. Each such destination of the digital signals may require different operations to be performed on the digital signal (such as delay, broadening, or digital convolution with a given digital pattern). These operations may be performed by the digital manager 354 and may be specified by control signals from the pulsers 3020-302L−1. This allows each pulser 302, to generate digital signals to different destinations and allows different ones of pulsers 3020-302L−1 to generate digital signals to the same destination while saving resources.


The synchronization manager 366 comprises circuitry operable to manage synchronization of the various circuits shown in FIG. 3B. Such synchronization is advantageous in a modular and dynamic system, such as quantum controller 210, where different ones of pulsers 3020-302L−1 generate, receive, and process pulses to and from different quantum elements at different times. For example, while carrying out a quantum algorithm, a first pulser circuit 302l and a second pulser circuit 3022 may sometimes need to transmit pulses at precisely the same time and at other times transmit pulses independently of one another. In the example implementation shown, the synchronization manager 366 reduces the overhead involved in performing such synchronization.


The data exchange circuitry 364 is operable to manage exchange of data among the various circuits shown in FIG. 3B. For example, while carrying out a quantum algorithm, a first pulser circuit 3021 and a second pulser circuit 3022 may sometimes need to exchange information. As just one example, pulser 302l may need to share, with pulser 3022, the characteristics of an inbound signal Al1 that it just processed so that pulser 3022 can generate a raw outbound pulse CP′2 based on the characteristics of Al1. The data exchange circuitry 364 may enable such information exchange. In an example implementation, the data exchange circuitry 364 may comprise one or more registers to and from which the pulsers 3020-302L−1 can read and write.


The I/O manager 368 is operable to route information between the quantum controller 210 and the quantum programming subsystem 202. Machine code quantum algorithm descriptions may be received via the I/O manager 368. Accordingly, the I/O manager 368 may comprise circuitry for loading the machine code into the necessary registers/memory (including any SRAM, DRAM, FPGA BRAM, flash memory, programmable read only memory, etc.) of the quantum controller 210 as well as for reading contents of the registers/memory of the quantum controller 210 and conveying the contents to the quantum programming subsystem 202. The I/O manager 368 may, for example, include a PCIe controller, AXI controller/interconnect, and/or the like.



FIG. 4 shows an example implementation of the pulser of FIG. 3B. The example pulser 302I shown comprises instruction memory 402, pulse template memory 404, digital pattern memory 406, control circuitry 408, and compute and/or signal processing circuitry (CSP) 410.


The memories 402, 404, 406 may comprise one or more be any type of suitable storage elements (e.g., DRAM, SRAM, Flash, etc.). The instructions stored in memory 402 are instructions to be executed out by the pulser 302I for carrying out its role in a quantum algorithm. Because different pulsers 3020-302L−1 have different roles to play in any particular quantum algorithm (e.g., generating different pulses at different times), the instructions memory 402 for each pulser 302I may be specific to that pulser. For example, the quantum algorithm description 206 from the quantum programming subsystem 202 may comprise a first set of instructions to be loaded (via I/O manager 368) into pulser 3020, a second set of instructions to be loaded into pulser 302l, and so on. Each pulse template stored in memory 404 comprises a sequence of one or more samples of any arbitrary shape (e.g., Gaussian, sinc, impulse, etc.) representing the pulses to be sent to pulse operation circuitry 358. Each digital pattern stored in memory 406 comprises a sequence of one or more binary values which may represent the digital pulses to be sent to the digital manager 354 for generating digital control signals DigCtrl0-DigCtrlJ−1.


The control circuitry 408 is operable to execute the instructions stored in memory 402 to process inbound signal Ali, generate raw outbound pulses CP′I, and generate digital control signals in_slctI, out_slctI, D_portI, DI, IFI, FI, ops_slctI, ops_ctrlI, resultsI, dmod_slctI and pair. In the example implementation shown, the processing of the inbound signal Ali is performed by the CSP circuitry 410 and based (at least in part) on the signal f_dmodI.


The compute and/or signal processing circuitry (CSP) 410 is operable to perform computational and/or signal processing functions, which may comprise, for example Boolean-algebra based logic and arithmetic functions and demodulation (e.g., of inbound signals AII). The CSP 410 may comprise memory in which are stored instructions for performing the functions and demodulation. The instructions may be specific to a quantum algorithm to be performed and be generated during compilation of a quantum machine specification and QUA program.


In operation of an example implementation, generation of a raw outbound pulse CP′I comprises the control circuitry 408: (1) determining a pulse template to retrieve from memory 404 (e.g., based on a result of computations and/or signal processing performed by the CSP 410); (2) retrieving the pulse template; (3) performing some preliminary processing on the pulse template; (4) determining the values of F, IF, pair, ops_slctI, and dmod_slctI to be sent to the pulse operation manager 356 (as predetermined in the quantum algorithm description and/or determined dynamically based on results of computations and/or signal processing performed by the CSP 410); (5) determining the value of ops_ctrlI to be sent to the pulse operation circuitry 358; (6) determining the value of in_slctI to be sent to the input manager 352; (7) determining a digital pattern to retrieve from memory 406 (as predetermined in the quantum algorithm description and/or determined dynamically based on results of computations and/or signal processing performed by the CSP 410); (8) outputting the digital pattern as Di to the digital manager along with control signal D_portI (as predetermined in the quantum algorithm description and/or determined dynamically based on results of computations and/or signal processing performed by the CSP 410); (9) outputting the raw outbound pulse CP′I to the pulse operations circuitry 358; (10) outputting resultsI to the I/O manager.



FIG. 5 shows an example implementation of the pulse operations manager and pulse operations circuitry of FIG. 3B. The pulse operations circuitry 358 comprises a plurality of pulse modification circuits 5080-508R−1 (R is an integer ≥1 in general, and R=L/2 in the example shown). The pulse operations manager 356 comprises control circuitry 502, routing circuitry 506, and a plurality of modification settings circuits 5040-504K−1.


Although the example implementation has a 1-to-2 correspondence between pulse modification circuits 5080-508R−1 and pulser circuits 3020-302L−1, such does not need to be the case. In other implementations there may be fewer pulse modification circuits 508 than pulser circuits 302. Similarly, other implementations may comprise more pulse modification circuits 508 than pulser circuits 302.


As an example, in some instances, two of the pulsers 3020-302L−1 may generate two raw outbound pulses which are a phase-quadrature pulse pair. For example, assuming CP1 and CP2 are a phase-quadrature pulse pair to be output on path 3133. In this example, pulse operations circuitry 358 may process CP1 and CP2 by multiplying a vector representation of CP′1 and CP′2 by one or more 2 by 2 matrices to: (1) perform single-sideband-modulation, as given by








(




CP
1






CP
2




)

=


(




cos

(

ω
*
TS
*

T

clck

1



)




-

sin

(

ω
*
TS
*

T

clck

1



)







sin

(

ω
*
TS
*

T

clck

1



)




cos

(

ω
*
TS
*

T

clck

1



)




)




(




CP
1







CP
2





)



,





where ω is the frequency of the single side band modulation and TS is the time passed since the reference time (e.g. the beginning of a certain control protocol); (2) keep track of frame-of-reference rotations, as given by








(




CP
1






CP
2




)

=


(




cos

(
ϕ
)




-

sin

(
ϕ
)







sin

(
ϕ
)




cos

(
ϕ
)




)




(




CP
1







CP
2





)



,





where ϕ is the total phase that the frame of reference accumulated since the reference time; and/or (3) perform an IQ-mixer correction







(




CP
1






CP
2




)

=


(




C
00




C
01






C
10




C
11




)




(




CP
1







CP
2





)







where C00, C01, C10, and C11 are the elements of a matrix that corrects for IQ-mixer imperfections. In an example implementation, each modification settings circuit, 504k, contains registers that contain the matrix elements of three matrices:








C
k

=

(




C

k

00





C

k

01







C

k

10





C

k

11





)


,





an IQ-mixer correction matrix;








S
k

=

(




cos

(

ω
*
TS
*

T

clck

1



)




-

sin

(

ω
*
TS
*

T

clck

1



)







sin

(

ω
*
TS
*

T

clck

1



)




cos

(

ω
*
TS
*

T

clck

1



)




)


,





a single side band frequency modulation matrix; and








F
k

=

(




cos

(

ϕ
k

)




-

sin

(

ϕ
k

)







sin

(

ϕ
k

)




cos


(

ϕ
k

)





)


,





a frame rotation matrix, which rotates the IQ axes around the axis perpendicular to the IQ plane (i.e. the z-axis if I and Q are the x-axis and y-axis). In an example implementation, each modification settings circuit 504k also contains registers that contain the elements of the matrix products CkSkFk and SkFk.


In the example shown, each pulse modification circuit 508r is operable to process two raw outbound pulses CP′2r and CP′2r+1 according to: the modification settings ops_cnfg2r and ops_cnfg2r+1; the signals ops_ctrl2r and ops_ctrl2r+1; and the signals pair2r and pair2r+1. In an example implementation pair2r and pair2r+1 may be communicated as ops_ctrl2r and ops_ctrl2r+1. The result of the processing is outbound pulses CP2r and CP2r+1. Such processing may comprise adjusting a phase, frequency, and/or amplitude of the raw outbound pulses CP′2r and CP′2r+1. In an example implementation, ops_cnfg2r and ops_cnfg2r+1 are in the form of a matrix comprising real and/or complex numbers and the processing comprises matrix multiplication involving a matrix representation of the raw outbound pulses CP2r and CP2r+1 and the ops_cnfg2r and ops_cnfg2r+1 matrix.


The control circuitry 502 is operable to exchange information with the pulser circuits 3020-302L−1 to generate values of ops_confg0-ops_confgL−1 and f_demod0-f_demodL−1, to control routing circuitry 506 based on signals ops_slct0-ops_slctL−1 and dmod_slct0-dmod_slctL−1, and to update pulse modification settings 5040-504K−1 based on IF0-IFL−1 and F0-FL−1 such that pulse modification settings output to pulse operations circuitry 358 are specifically tailored to each raw outbound pulse (e.g., to which quantum element 222 the pulse is destined, to which signal path 313 the pulse is destined, etc.) to be processed by pulse operations circuitry 358.


Each modification settings circuit 504k comprises circuitry operable to store modification settings for later retrieval and communication to the pulse operations circuitry 358. The modification settings stored in each modification settings circuit 504k may be in the form of one or more two-dimensional complex-valued matrices. Each signal path 3130-313K−1 may have particular characteristics (e.g., non-idealities of interconnect, mixers, switches, attenuators, amplifiers, and/or circuits along the paths) to be accounted for by the pulse modification operations. Similarly, each quantum element 1220-122k may have a particular characteristics (e.g. resonance frequency, frame of reference, etc.). In an example implementation, the number of pulse modification settings, K, stored in the circuits 504 corresponds to the number of quantum element 1220-122K−1 and of signal paths 3130-313K−1 such that each of the modification settings circuits 5040-504K−1 stores modification settings for a respective one of the quantum elements 1220-122K−1 and/or paths 3130-313K−1. In other implementations, there may be more or fewer pulse modification circuits 504 than signal paths 313 and more or fewer pulse modification circuits 504 than quantum elements 122 and more or fewer signal paths 313 than quantum elements 122. The control circuitry 502 may load values into the modification settings circuit 5040-504K−1 via signal 503.


The routing circuitry 506 is operable to route modification settings from the modification settings circuits 5040-504L−1 to the pulse operations circuit 358 (as ops_confg0-ops_confgL−1) and to the pulsers 3020-302L−1 (as f_dmod0-f_dmodL−1). In the example implementation shown, which of the modification settings circuits 5040-504K−1 has its/their contents sent to which of the pulse modification circuits 5080-508R−1 and to which of the pulsers 3020-302L−1 is controlled by the signal 505 from the control circuitry 502.


The signal ops_slctI informs the pulse operations manager 356 as to which modification settings 504k to send to the pulse modification circuit 5081. The pulser 302I may determine ops_slctI based on the particular quantum element 122k and/or signal path 313k to which the pulse is to be transmitted (e.g., the resonant frequency of the quantum element, frame of reference, and/or mixer correction). The determination of which quantum element and/or signal path to which a particular pulser 302I is to send an outbound pulse at a particular time may be predetermined in the quantum algorithm description or may be determined based on calculations performed by the pulser 302I and/or others of the pulsers 3020-302L−1 during runtime. The control circuitry 502 may then use this information to configure the routing block 506 such that the correct modification settings are routed to the correct one or more of the pulse modification circuits 5080-508L−1.


In an example implementation, the digital signal IF1 instructs the pulse operations manager 356 to update a frequency setting of the modification settings circuit 504k indicated by ops_slctI. In an example implementation, the frequency setting is the matrix Sk (described above) and the signal IF1 carries new values indicating the new ωk to be used in the elements of the matrix Sk. The new values may, for example, be determined during a calibration routine (e.g., performed as an initial portion of the quantum algorithm) in which one or more of the pulsers 3020-302L−1 sends a series of outbound pulses CP, each at a different carrier frequency, and then measures the corresponding inbound signals AI.


In an example implementation, the signal FI instructs the pulse operations manager 356 to update a frame setting of the modification settings circuit 504k indicated by ops_slctI. In an example implementation, the frame setting is the matrix Fk (described above) and the signal FI carries a rotation matrix FI which multiplies with Fk to rotate Fk. This can be written as








F
k

=



F
I



F
k


=



(




cos

(

Δ

ϕ

)




-

sin

(

Δ

ϕ

)







sin

(

Δ

ϕ

)




cos

(

Δ

ϕ

)




)




(




cos

(

ϕ
k

)




-

sin

(

ϕ
k

)







sin

(

ϕ
k

)




cos

(

ϕ
k

)




)


=

(




cos

(


ϕ
k

+

Δ

ϕ


)




-

sin

(


ϕ
k

+

Δ

ϕ


)







sin

(


ϕ
k

+

Δ

ϕ


)




cos

(


ϕ
k

+

Δ

ϕ


)




)




,





where ϕk is the frame of reference before the rotation and Δϕ is the amount by which to rotate the frame of reference. The pulser 302I may determine Δϕ based on a predetermined algorithm or based on calculations performed by the pulsers 302I and/or others of the pulsers 3020-302L−1 during runtime.


In an example implementation, the signal dmod_sclti informs the pulse operations manager 356 from which of the modification settings circuits 504k to retrieve values to be sent to pulser 302I as f_dmodI. The pulser 302, may determine dmod_slctI based on the particular quantum element 122k and/or signal path 315k from which the pulse to be processed arrived. The determination of from which quantum element and/or signal path a particular pulser 302I is to process an inbound pulse at a particular time may be predetermined in the quantum algorithm description or may be determined based on calculations performed by the pulser 302I and/or others of the pulsers 3020-302L−1 during runtime. The control circuitry 502 may then use this information to configure the routing block 506 such that the correct modification settings are routed to the correct one of the pulsers 3020-302L−1. For example, when pulse generation circuit 302I needs to demodulate a pulse signal AII from quantum element 122k, it will send a dmod_scltI signal instructing the pulse operation manager 356 to rout the element SFk00=cos(ωk*time_stamp+ϕk) from modification settings circuit 504k to pulser 302I (as f_dmodI).


In the example implementation shown, the digital signals C0-CK−1 provide information about signal-path-specific modification settings to be used for each of the signal paths 3130-313K−1. For example, each signal Ck may comprise a matrix to be multiplied by a matrix representation of a raw outbound pulse CP′I such that the resulting output outbound pulse is pre-compensated for errors (e.g., resulting from imperfections in mixers, amplifiers, wiring, etc.) introduced as the outbound pulse propagates along signal path 313k. The result of the pre-compensation is that output outbound pulse CPI will have the proper characteristics upon arriving at the quantum processor 218. The signals C0-CK−1 may, for example, be calculated by the quantum controller 210 itself, by the programming subsystem 202, and/or by external calibration equipment and provided via I/O manager 368. The calculation of signals may be done as part of a calibration routine which may be performed before a quantum algorithm and/or may be determined/adapted in real-time as part of a quantum algorithm (e.g., to compensate for temperature changes during the quantum algorithm).



FIG. 6A shows frequency generation circuitry of the quantum controller of FIG. 3B. In the example implementation shown, the frequency generation circuitry is part of control circuitry 502 of pulse operations manager circuitry 356. The frequency generation circuitry comprises K coordinate rotation digital computer (CORDIC) circuits 6020-602K−1, phase generation circuitry 604, timestamp register 606, and S-Matrix generation circuitry 608.


Each CORDIC circuit 602k is operable to compute cosine and sine of its input, θk, thus generating two signals cos(θk) and sin(θk).


The phase generation circuitry 604 is operable to generate the CORDIC input parameters θ0k−1 based on: (1) the frequency setting signals IF0-IFL−1 from the pulsers 3020-302L−1; and (2) the contents, TS, of the timestamp register 606.


The timestamp register 606 comprises circuitry (e.g., a counter incremented on each cycle of the clock signal clk1) operable to track the number of cycles of clk1 since a reference point in time (e.g., power up of the quantum controller 210, start of execution of set of instructions of a quantum algorithm by the quantum controller 210, etc.).


In the example shown, the phase generation circuitry 604 sets θ0=2πf0(TS)(dtclk1), where f0 is a frequency determined from the signal IF0, TS is the number of clock cycles counted from the reference point and dtclk1 is the duration of a single clock cycle of clk1. This leads to the CORDIC outputs being a pair of phase-quadrature reference signals, cos(2πf0(TS)(dtclk1)) and sin(2πf0(TS)(dtclk1)), as in the example shown, which are used to generate the S0 rotation matrix that rotates at a frequency f0.


As shown in FIG. 6B, the signal IF1 may comprise an update component and an fI component. In an example implementation, when updateI is asserted then the phase generation circuitry updates one of more of f0-fK−1 to be the value of fI.


The S-matrix generation circuitry 608 is operable to build the matrices S0-SK−1 from the outputs of the CORDIC circuits 6020-602K−1. In an example implementation, the S-matrix generation circuit 606 is operable to synchronize changes to the S matrices such that any matrix update occurs on a desired cycle of clock clk1 (which may be determined by the control information IF0-IFL−1).


With K CORDIC circuits 602k, the frequency generation circuitry is operable to concurrently generate K S-matrices. In instances that more than K frequencies are needed over the course of a set of instructions, the phase generation circuit 604 is operable to change the input parameter θk of one or more of the CORDIC circuits 6020-602K−1 to stop generating one frequency and start generating the K+1th frequency. In some instances, it may be necessary for the new frequency to start at a phase θ that would have been the phase if the new frequency was being generated from the initial reference time (e.g., because the new frequency would be used to address a quantum element that has a resonance at the new frequency and that was coherent since the reference point). In some other instances, it might be necessary to start the new frequency from the phase that the old frequency ended in. The phase generation circuit 604 and timestamp register 606 enable both of these possibilities.



FIG. 7 shows an example implementation of the digital manager of FIG. 3B. Shown in FIG. 7 are the digital manager 376, controlled circuits 7100-710J−1, and input manager 372.


The example implementation of the digital manager 376 comprises input routing circuit 702, configuration circuit 704, output routing circuit 706, processing paths 7080-708Z−1 (where Z is an integer), and routing control circuit 712.


The configuration circuit 704 is operable to store configuration settings and use those settings to configure the processing paths 7080-708Z−1 and/or the routing control circuit 712. The settings may, for example, be loaded via the signal DM_config as part of the quantum algorithm description provided by quantum programming subsystem 202. The settings may comprise, for example, one or more of: a bitmap on which may be based a determination of which of signals D0-DL−1 to route to which of signals P′0-P′Z−1 for one or more instructions of a quantum algorithm; a bitmap on which may be based a determination of which processing path outputs P0-PZ−1 to route to which of DigOut0-DigOutJ+M−1 for one or more instructions of a quantum algorithm; and one or more bit patterns which processing paths 7080-708Z−1 may convolve with one or more of the signals P′0-P′Z−1 for one or more instructions of a quantum algorithm.


The input routing circuit 702 is operable to route each of the digital signals D0-DL−1 to one or more of the processing paths 7080-708Z−1. At any given time (e.g., for any particular instruction of every pulser 302I of pulsers 3020-302L), the input routing circuit 702 may determine to which of the processing paths 7080-708Z−1 to rout the signal DI of signals D0-DL−1 based on the signal faninI of signals fanin0-faninL−1. That is, for a particular instruction, the digital signal DI may be routed to any one or more of paths 7080-708Z−1 based on the value of fanini for that instruction. For example, fanini may be a Z-bit signal and a state of each bit of faninI during a particular instruction may indicate whether DI is to be routed to a corresponding one of the Z processing paths 7080-708Z−1 during that instruction. An example implementation of the input routing circuit 702 is described below with reference to FIG. 8.


The output routing circuit 706 is operable to route each of the digital signals P0-PZ−1 to one or more of DigOut0-DigOutJ+M−1 (in the example shown DigOut0-DigOutJ+M−1 connect to stream0-streamM−1, respectively, and DigOutM-DigOutJ+M−1 connect to DigCtrl0-DigCtrlJ−1, respectively). At any given time (e.g., for any particular instruction of every pulser 302I of pulsers 3020-302L), the output routing circuit 706 may determine to which of DigOut0-DigOutJ+M−1 to rout the signal Pi of the signals P0-PL−1 based on the signal fanoutI of signals fanout0-fanoutZ−1. That is, for a particular instruction, the digital signal Pz (z an integer between 0 and Z) may be routed to any one or more of DigOut0-DigOutJ+M−1 based on the value of fanoutz for that instruction. For example, values of fanoutz may be (J+M−1) bits and a state of each bit of fanoutz during a particular instruction may indicate whether Pz is to be routed to a corresponding one of the J+M−1 signals DigOut during that instruction. An example implementation of the output routing circuit 704 is described below with reference to FIG. 8.


Each of the processing path circuits 7080-708Z−1 is operable to manipulate a respective one of signals P′0-P′Z−1 to generate a corresponding manipulated signal P0-PZ−1. The manipulation may comprise, for example, introducing a delay to the signal such that the resulting one or more of DigOut0-DigOutJ+M−1 reach(es) its/their destination (a controlled circuit 710 and/or input manager 372) at the proper time with respect to the time of arrival of a corresponding quantum control pulse at the corresponding destination.


Each of the controlled circuits 7100-710J−1 and input manager 372 is a circuit which, at least some of the time, needs to operate synchronously with quantum control pulses generated by one or more of pulsers 3020-302L−1 (possibly a reflection/return pulse from a quantum processor in the case of input manager 372). Accordingly, each of the control circuits 7100-710J−1 receives a respective one of control signals DigOut0-DigCtrlJ−1 that is synchronized with a respective quantum control pulse. Similarly, input manager 372 receives a plurality of the DigOut signals (one for each stream input).


The routing controller 712 comprises circuitry operable to generate signals fanin0-faninL−1 and fanout0-fanoutZ−1 based on D_path0-D_pathL−1, D_port0-D_portL−1, and/or information stored in configuration circuit 704.



FIG. 8 shows an example implementation of the digital manager of FIG. 3B. The example input routing circuit 502 comprises routing circuits 8020-802L−1 and combining circuits 8040-804L−1. The example output routing circuitry 506 comprises circuits routing circuits 8080-808Z−1 and combining circuits 8100-810J−1. The example processing path circuits are convolution circuits 8060-806Z−1.


Each of the routing circuits 8020-802L is operable to route a respective one of signals D0-DL−1 to one or more of the combining circuits 8040-804Z−1. To which of combining circuit(s) 8040-804Z−1 the signal DI is routed is determined based on the signal faninI. In an example implementation, each signal faninI is a Z-bits signal and, for a pulserI instruction, the value of bit z of the signal faninI determines whether the signal DI is to be routed to combining circuit 804z for that instruction. The value of faninI may be updated on a per-instruction basis.


Each of combining circuits 8040-804L−1 is operable to combine up to L of the signals DO-DL−1 to generate a corresponding one of signals P0-PZ−1. In an example implementation, the combining comprises OR-ing together the values of the up to L signals.


Each of the routing circuits 8080-808Z−1 is operable to route a respective one of signals P′0-P′Z−1 to one or more of the combining circuits 8100-810J−1. To which of combining circuit(s) 8100-810J−1 the signal P′z is routed is determined based on the signal fanoutz. In an example implementation, each signal fanoutz is a (J+M−1)-bit signal and the value of bit j+m−1 of the signal fanoutz determines whether the signal P′z is to be routed to combining circuit 804j+m−1. In an example implementation the value of fanoutz is preconfigured before the runtime of the quantum algorithm, however, in another implementation it may be updated dynamically (e.g., on a per-instruction basis).


Each combining circuit of combining circuits 8100-810J−1 is operable to combine up to Z of the signals P′0-P′Z−1 (received via inputs 8030 to 803Z−1) to generate a corresponding one of signals DigOut0-DigOutJ+M−1. In an example implementation, the combining comprises OR-ing together the values of the up to Z signals.


Each convolution circuit 806z is operable to convolve signal Pz with patternz to generate signal P′z. In an example implementation, patternz is preconfigured before runtime of the quantum algorithm, however, in another implementation it may be updated dynamically. patternz may be determined based on: the destination(s) of signal Pz(e.g., to which of controlled circuits 510 and/or input of input manager 352 Pz is intended); characteristics of the corresponding quantum control pulse (e.g., any one or more of its frequency, phase, amplitude, and/or duration); and/or process, temperature, and/or voltage variations.



FIG. 9 illustrates configuration and control of the quantum controller via the quantum programming subsystem. In FIG. 9, the quantum controller 210 comprises one or more instances of various circuits (such as the pulser, input manager, output manager, digital manager, pulse operations manager, and analog front end circuits described above). Connected to the inputs and outputs of the quantum controller 210 may be a plurality of external devices (e.g., oscilloscopes, waveform generators, spectrum analyzers, mixers, amplifiers, etc.) and a plurality of quantum elements. As described in further detail below, these physical circuits can be allocated and deallocated independently of one another such that the physical resources of the quantum controller 210, and the quantum elements and external devices connected to the quantum controller 210 via the analog and digital inputs and outputs, can be organized into one or more “quantum machines.”


Also shown in FIG. 9 are a compiler 906 and quantum machines manager 908 of the quantum programming subsystem 202.


The compiler 906 comprises circuitry operable to generate a machine code quantum algorithm description based on: (1) a specification 902; (2) a pulse generation program 904; and (3) a resources management data structure from the quantum machines manager 908.


The specification 902 identifies resources of a quantum machine some of which are mapped to physical circuits during an instantiation of a quantum machines (e.g. input and output ports of the quantum controller 210), and some of which the compiler attaches to physical circuits of the quantum controller 210 during compilation of a Pulse generation Program 904. The compiler 906 may allocate resources for executing the program 904 based on the specification 902, the program 904, and/or the available resources indicated by the quantum machines manager 908. As an example, assume a scenario in which there are five quantum elements in the specification 902 and the program 904 uses only two of the quantum elements; the number of the pulsers 3020-302L allocated may depend on the available resources and the specifics of the program 904. In one case the compiler 906 may allocate a first number (e.g., two) of the pulsers 3020-302L for interfacing with the two quantum elements and in another case the compiler may allocate a second number (e.g., four) for sending pulses to the two quantum elements. Examples of resource definitions which may be present in specification 902 are described below with reference to FIGS. 10A-C. In an example implementation, Python is used as a “host” language for the specification and the specification is a Python dictionary. In this example implementation the Python syntax/constructs can thus be leveraged to create the specification (Python variables, functions, etc.).


The pulse generation program 904 comprises statements that define a sequence of operations to be performed by the quantum machine defined in the specification 902. Such operations typically include the generation of one or more analog pulses to be sent to a controlled element, such as a quantum element. Such operations typically include measuring one or more return pulses from an element. The pulse generation program is also referred to herein as a QUA program. Functions, syntax, etc. of the QUA programming language are described below. In an example implementation, Python is used as a “host” language for the QUA program. This allows leveraging Python syntax/constructs (Python variables, functions, etc.) to generate the QUA program, but it is still a QUA—not Python—program to be compiled by the compiler 906 to generate QOP machine code, and to be executed on the quantum controller/s 210.


In an example implementation, a QUA program defines the sequence of statements for: (1) Generating, shaping and sending pulses to the quantum device; (2) Measuring of pulses returning from the quantum device; (3) Performing real-time classical calculations on the measured data and storing results in classical variables; (4) Performing real-time classical calculations on classical variables; (5) Controlling the flow of the program, including branching statements; and (6) Streaming of data from the quantum controller 210 to the quantum programing system 202 and processing and saving it in the quantum programing system 202.


In addition to the specification of which pulses are played, a QUA program can also specify when they should be played through both explicit and implicit statements and dependency constructs. Thus, a QUA program can define exactly the timing in which pulses are played, down to the single sample level and single clock cycles of the quantum controller 210.


In an example implementation, the pulses syntax defines an implicit pulse dependency, which determines the order of pulse execution. The dependency can be summarized as follows: (1) Each pulse is played immediately, unless dependent on a previous pulse yet to be played; (2) Pulses applied to the same quantum element are dependent on each other according to the order in which they are written in the program In another implementation, timing and ordering or pulses may be set forth explicitly in the QUA program.


Example QUA programming constructs are described below in Table 1.









TABLE 1





QUA programming constructs















play(pulse * amp(g00, g01, g10, g11), qe, duration=None, condition=None, break_condition=None )


Play a pulse to an element.


The pulse will be modified according to the properties of the element defined in the specification, and


then played to the analog output(s) defined in the specification.


Parameters:









pulse - name of the pulse, as defined in the quantum machine specification.



qe - name of the quantum element, as defined in the quantum machine specification.



duration - duration of the pulse (″=None″ means default is no explicit duration)



gij - an expression;



amp( ) - matrix definition;



condition - if present, the pulse will be played with the condition evaluates to true (″=None″



means default is no condition);



break_condition - if present, the pulser will be stopped when the condition evaluates to true



(″=None″ means default is no break_condition);







It is possible to scale the pulse′s amplitude dynamically by using the following syntax:









play(′pulse_name′ * amp(v), ′element′), where amp(v) = mat(v, 0, 0, v)







where v is a variable.


Moreover, if the pulse is intended for an element that receives a pulse pair and thus is defined with


two waveforms, the two waveforms, described as a column vector, can be multiplied by a matrix:









play(′pulse_name′ * amp([v_00, v_01, v_10, v_11]), ′element′),







where v_ij, i,j={0,1}, are variables.


Example:









>>> with program( ) as prog:



>>> v1 = declare(fixed)



>>> assign(v1, 0.3)



>>> play(′pulse1′, ′qe1′)



>>> play(′pulse1′ * amp(0.5), ′qe1′)



>>> play(′pulse1′ * amp(v1), ′qe1′)



>>> play(′pulse1′ * amp([0.9, v1, −v1, 0.9]), ′qe_iq_pair′)







wait(duration, *qes)


Wait for the given duration on all provided elements.


During the wait command the quantum controller 210 will output 0.0 to the elements.








 Parameters:
duration (int | QUA variable of type int) - time to wait (e.g., in multiples of 4nsec



with Range: [4, 224] in steps of 1).



*qes (str | sequence of str) - elements to wait on (the Asterix denotes there can be



0 or more)







measure(pulse, qe, Rvar, *outputs)


The measure statement allows operating on a quantum element (which has outputs), by


sending a pulse to it, after some time acquiring the returning signal and processing it in


various ways


An element for which a measurement is applied must have outputs defined in the quatum machine


specification.


A measurement may comprise:









playing a pulse to the element (identical to a play statement)



waiting for a duration of time defined as the time_of_flight in the definition of the element,



and then sampling the returning pulse. The analog input to be sampled is defined in the



definition of the element.



processing the returned samples using the listed process(es) (if any). The processing could be,



for example, demodulation and integration with specified integration weights, which



produces a scalar, accumulated demodulation and integration that produces a vector,



a sequence of demodulation and integrations that produces a vector, FIR filter, neural



network.







Parameters


 pulse - name of the pulse, as defined in the quantum machine specification. Pulse must have


 a measurement operation.


 qe - name of the element, as defined in the quantum machine specification. The element must


 have outputs.


 Rvar - a result variable reference, a string, or ‘None’. If Rvar is a result variable reference, the


 raw ADC data will be sent to the quantum programing subsystem 202 and processed there


 according to the result processing section of the QUA program. If Rvar is a string, the raw ADC


 data will be sent to the quantum programming subsystem 202 and saved as it is with the default


 minimal processing. If Rvar is set to None, raw results will not be sent to quantum programming


 subsystem 202 and will not be saved. In one implementation, the raw results will be saved as long


 as the digital pulse that is played with pulse is high.


 outputs - a tuple with the form (processing identifier, params, variable name), where:









processing identifier









 defined in the top-level specification and/or in reserved words of the QUA language



 and referred to in the pulse definition. A processing identifier may, for example, refer



 to a set of integration weights, or neural network parameters, or the like.









Params









 parameters passed to the processing reference









variable name









 the name of a QUA variable to which the processing result is assigned.







 zero or more output tuples may be defined.


Example:


>>> with program( ) as prog:


>>> I = declare(fixed)


>>> Q = declare(fixed)


>>>


>>> # measure by playing ′meas_pulse1′ to QE ′rr1′, do not save raw results.


>>> # demodulate and integrate using ′cos_weights′ and store result in I, and also


>>> # demodulate and integrate using ′sin_weights′ and store result in Q


>>> measure(′meas_pulse1′, ′rr1′, None, (‘int’, ′cos_weights′, I), (‘int’ ′sin_weights′, Q))


>>>


>>> # measure by playing ′meas_pulse2′ to QE ′rr1′, save raw results to tag ′samples′.


>>> # demodulate and integrate data from ′out1′ port of ′rr1′ using ′optimized_weights′ as


integration weights


>>> # store result in I


>>> measure(′meas_pulse2′, ′rr1′, ′samples′, (‘int’, ′optimized_weights′, ′out1′, I))


align(*qes)









Align several quantum elements together.



All of the quantum elements referenced in *qes will wait for all the others to finish their



currently running statement.



Parameters











*qes (str | sequence of str) - a single quantum element, or list of quantum elements







pause( )









Pause the execution of the job until QmJob.resume( ) is called.



The quantum machines freezes on its current output state.







declare(t)









Declare a QUA variable to be used in subsequent expressions and assignments.



Declaration is performed by declaring a python variable with the return value of this function.



Parameters











t - The type of QUA variable. Possible values: int, fixed, bool, where:









 int









 a signed 32-bit number









 fixed









 a signed 4.28 fixed point number









 bool









 either True or False









Returns



The variable



Example:



>>> a = declare(fixed)



>>> play(′pulse′ * amp(a), ′qe′)







assign(var,_exp)









Set the value of a given QUA variable.



Parameters











var (QUA variable) - The variable to set (defined by the declare function)




_exp (QUA expression) - An expression to set the variable to









Example:



>>> with program( ) as prog:



>>> v1 = declare(fixed)



>>> assign(v1, 1.3)



>>> play(′pulse1′ * amp(v1), ′qe1′)







save(var, tag)









Save a QUA variable with a given tag.



The tag will appear later as a field in the saved results object returned by QmJob.get_results( ).



The type of the variable determines the python type, according to the following rule:











 int −> int




 fixed −> float




 bool −> bool









Parameters











var (QUA variable) - A QUA variable to save




tag (str) - A name to save the value under







update_frequency(qe, new_frequency)









Dynamically update the frequency of the NCO associated with a given quantum element.



This changes the frequency from the value defined in the quantum machine specification.



Parameters











qe (str) - The quantum element associated with the NCO whose frequency will be









changed











new_frequency (int) - The new frequency value to set in units of Hz. Range: (0 to









5000000) in steps of 1.









Example:



>>> with program( ) as prog:



>>> update_frequency(″q1″, 4000000)







z_rotation(angle, *qes)









Shift the phase of the NCO associated with a quantum element by the given angle.



This is typically used for virtual z-rotations. Equivalent to z_rot( )



Parameters











angle (float) - The angle to add to the current phase (in radians)




*qes (str | sequence of str) - A quantum element, or sequence of quantum elements,









associated with the NCO whose phase will be shifted







z_rot(angle, *qes)









Shift the phase of the NCO associated with a quantum element by the given angle.



This is typically used for virtual z-rotations. Equivalent to z_rotation( )



Parameters











angle (float) - The angle to add to the current phase (in radians)




*qes (str | sequence of str) - A quantum element, or sequence of quantum elements,









associated with the NCO whose phase will be shifted







set_frame(qes, angle)









Set the phase of the frame matrix associated with a quantum element to the given angle.







reset_phase(qes, angle)









Set the total phase of the frequency modulation of a quantum element to zero (both the



frequency modulation matrix and the frame matrix).







infinite_loop_( )









Infinite loop flow control statement in QUA.



To be used with a context manager.



Optimized for zero latency between iterations, provided that no more than a single quantum



element appears in the loop.



Note



In case multiple quantum elements need to be used in an infinite loop, it is possible to add



several loops in parallel (see example).



Example:



>>> with infinite_loop_( ):



>>> play(′pulse1′, ′qe1′)



>>> with infinite_loop_( ):



>>> play(′pulse2′, ′qe2′)







for(var=None, init=None, cond=None, update=None)









For loop flow control statement in QUA.



To be used with a context manager.



Parameters











var (QUA variable) - QUA variable used as iteration variable




init (QUA expression) - an expression which sets the initial value of the iteration variable




cond (QUA expression) - an expression which evaluates to a boolean variable, determines









if to continue to next loop iteration











update (QUA expression) - an expression to add to var with each loop iteration









Example:



>>> x = declare(fixed)



>>> with for(var=x, init=0, cond=x<=1, update=x+0.1):



>>> play(′pulse′, ′qe′)







if(condition)









If flow control statement in QUA.



To be used with a context manager.



The QUA code block following the statement will be executed only if condition evaluates to



true.



Parameters











condition - A boolean expression to evaluate









Example:



>>> x=declare(int)



>>> with if_(x>0):



>>> play(′pulse′, ′qe′)







else









Else flow control statement in QUA.



To be used with a context manager.



Must appear after an if( ) statement.



The QUA code block following the statement will be executed only if expression in



preceding if( ) statement evaluates to false.



Example:



>>> x=declare(int)



>>> with if(x>0):



>>> play(′pulse′, ′qe′)



>>> with else( ):



>>> play(′other_pulse′, ′qe′)









The Play statement in QUA instructs the quantum controller 210 to send the indicated pulse to the indicated element. The quantum controller 210 will modify or manipulate the pulse according to the element's properties defined in the quantum machine specification (i.e., the compiler will generate the required pulse modification settings which will then be stored to the appropriate one or more of pulse modification settings circuit(s) 5040-504K−1), so the user is relieved of the burden of having to specify the modifications/manipulations in each individual Play statement.


If the element has a single input, the pulse sent to it may be defined with a single waveform. For example:


‘elements’: {






    • ‘qubit’: {
      • ‘SingleInput’: {
        • ‘port’: (‘con1’, 1),
      • },
      • ‘intermediate_frequency’: 70e6,
      • ‘operations’: {
        • ‘pulse1’: ‘pulse1’
      • },

    • },


      }


      ‘pulses’: {

    • ‘gauss_pulse_in’: {
      • ‘operation’: ‘control’,
      • ‘length’: 12,
      • ‘waveforms’: {
        • ‘single’: ‘wf1’,
      • }
      • },

    • },

    • ‘waveforms’: {
      • ‘wf1’: {
      • ‘type’: ‘arbitrary’,
        • ‘samples’:[0.49, 0.47, 0.44, 0.41, 0.37, 0.32, 0.32, 0.37, 0.41, 0.44, 0.47, 0.49]


          }





Denoting the samples of the waveform as si, the play statement instructs the quantum controller 210 to modulate the waveform samples with the intermediate frequency of the element:

{tilde over (s)}i=si cos(ωIFt+ϕF)

ωIF, is the intermediate frequency defined in the quantum machine specification of the element and ϕF is the frame phase, initially set to zero (see z_rot statement specifications for information on ϕF). The quantum controller 210 then plays si to the analog output port defined in the definition of the element (in the above example, port 1).


If the element has two mixed inputs (i.e. two output ports of the quantum controller 210 are connected to the element via an IQ mixer), in addition to the intermediate frequency, a mixer and a lo_frequency may be defined in the quantum machine specification. For example:


‘elements’: {






    • ‘qubit’: {
      • ‘mixedInputs’: {
        • ‘I’: (‘con1’, 1),
        • ‘Q’: (‘con1’, 2),
        • ‘mixer’: ‘mixer1’,
        • ‘lo_frequency’: 5.1e9,
      • },
      • ‘intermediate_frequency’: 70e6,
      • ‘operations’: {
        • ‘pulse1’: ‘pulse1’
      • },

    • },


      },





A pulse that is sent to such element may be defined with two waveforms. For example:


‘pulses’: {






    • ‘pulse1’: {
      • ‘operation’: ‘control’,
      • ‘length’: 12,
      • ‘waveforms’: {
        • ‘I’: ‘wf_I’,
        • ‘Q’: ‘wf_Q’,
      • },

    • },

    • },


      ‘waveforms’: {

    • ‘wf_I’: {
      • ‘type’: ‘arbitrary’,
      • ‘samples’:[0.49, 0.47, 0.44, 0.41, 0.37, 0.32, 0.32, 0.37, 0.41, 0.44, 0.47, 0.49]

    • },

    • ‘wf_Q’: {
      • ‘type’: ‘arbitrary’,
      • ‘samples’: [0.02, 0.03, 0.03, 0.04, 0.05, 0.00, 0.05, 0.04, 0.03, 0.03, 0.02, 0.02]

    • },


      }





In addition, a mixer can be defined with a mixer correction matrix that corresponds to the intermediate_frequency and the lo_frequency. For example:


‘mixers’: {






    • ‘mixer1’: [
      • {
        • ‘intermediate_frequency’: 70e6,
        • ‘lo_frequency’: 5.1e9,
        • ‘correction’: [0.9, 0.003, 0.0, 1.05]
      • }

    • ],





Denoting the samples of the waveforms by Ii and Qi, the play statement instructs the quantum controller 210 to modulate the waveform samples with the intermediate frequency of the element and to apply the mixer correction matrix in the following way:







(





I
~

ι







Q
~

ι




)

=


(




C
00




C
01






C
10




C
11




)



(




cos

(



ω
IF


t

+

ϕ
F


)




-

sin

(



ω
IF


t

+

ϕ
F


)







sin

(



ω
IF


t

+

ϕ
F


)




cos


(



ω
IF


t

+

ϕ
F


)





)



(




I
i






Q
i




)







ωIFωIF, is the intermediate and the Cij's are the matrix elements of the correction matrix defined in the mixer for the relevant intermediate_frequency and lo_frequency. As mentioned above, ϕF is the frame phase, initially set to zero (see z_rot statement specifications for information on ϕF). The quantum controller 210 then plays Ii and Qi to the analog output ports defined in the definition of the element (in the above example, port 1 and port 2, respectively).


An element could have digital inputs as well as analog inputs. Each digital input of an element may be defined with three properties: port, delay, and buffer. For example:


‘elements’: {






    • ‘qubit’: {
      • ‘mixedInputs’: {
        • ‘I’: (‘con1’, 1),
        • ‘Q’: (‘con1’, 2),
        • ‘mixer’: ‘mixer1’,
        • ‘lo_frequency’: 5.1e9,
      • },
      • ‘intermediate_frequency’: 70e6,
      • ‘digital_inputs’:
        • ‘digital_input1’:
        • ‘port’: (cont1, 1)
        • ‘delay’: 144
        • ‘buffer’: 8
        • ‘digital_input2’:
        • ‘port’: (cont1, 2)
        • ‘delay’: 88
        • ‘buffer’: 20
      • ‘operations’: {
        • ‘pulse1’: ‘pulse1’
      • },

    • },


      },





For a simple example, a pulse that is played to such quantum element could include a single digital marker which points to a single digital waveform. For example:


‘pulses’: {






    • ‘pulse1’: {
      • ‘operation’: ‘control’,
      • ‘length’: 40,
      • ‘waveforms’: {
        • ‘I’: ‘wf_I’,
        • ‘Q’: ‘wf_Q’,
      • },
      • ‘digital_marker’: ‘digital_waveform_high’

    • },

    • },


      ‘digital_waveforms’: {

    • ‘digital_waveform_high’: {
      • ‘samples’: [(1, 0)]

    • }


      }





The coding of the digital waveform may be a list of the form: [(value, length), (value, length), . . . , (value, length)], where each value is either 0 or 1 indicating the digital value to be played (digital high or low). Each length may be an integer (e.g., divisible by 4 in one example implementation) indicating for how many nanoseconds the value should be played. A length 0 indicates that the corresponding value is to be played for the remaining duration of the pulse. In the example above, the digital waveform is a digital high.


When such pulse is played to the element, via the play or the measurement command, the digital waveform may be sent to all the digital inputs of the element. For each digital input, however, the quantum controller 210 may: (1) Delay the digital waveform by the delay that is defined in the definition of the digital input (e.g., given in ns); (2) Convolve the digital waveform with a digital pattern that is high for a duration which is, for example, twice the buffer that is defined in the definition of the digital input (e.g., given in ns in a “buffer”); and (3) Play the digital waveform to the digital output of the quantum controller 210 that is indicated in the quantum machine specification to be connected to the digital input. In other implementations, the digital pattern with which the digital waveform to be convolved may be more complex than a simple high value. In one such example, the “buffer” object may comprise “duration” and “pattern” properties.


In the example above a play(pulse1, qubit) command would play: (1) A digital waveform to digital output 1, which starts 144 ns after the analog waveforms and which is high for 56 ns (the length of the pulse plus 2×8 ns); and (2) A digital waveform to digital output 2, which starts 88 ns after the analog waveforms and which is high for 80 ns (the length of the pulse plus 2×20 ns).


A measurement can be done for an element that has outputs defined in the quantum machine specification. For example:


‘elements’: {






    • ‘resonator’: {
      • ‘mixedInputs’: {
        • ‘I’: (‘con1’, 3),
        • ‘Q’: (‘con1’, 4),
        • ‘mixer’: ‘mixer1’,
        • ‘lo_frequency’: 7.3e9,
      • },
      • ‘intermediate_frequency’: 50e6,
      • ‘outputs’: {
        • ‘out’:: (‘con1’, 1),
      • },
      • ‘time_of_flight’: 196,
      • ‘smearing’: 20,

    • }


      },





As seen in the above example, when a quantum element has outputs, two additional properties may be defined: time_of_flight and smearing.


The pulse used in a measurement statement may also be defined as a measurement pulse and may have integration_weights defined. For example:


‘pulses’: {






    • ‘pulse1’: {
      • ‘operation’: ‘measurement’,
      • ‘length’: 400,
      • ‘waveforms’: {
        • ‘I’: ‘meas_wf_I’,
        • ‘Q’: ‘meas_wf_Q’,
      • },
      • ‘integration_weights’: {
        • ‘integ1’: ‘integW1’,
        • ‘integ2’: ‘integW2’,
      • }


        ‘integration_weights’: {

    • ‘integW1’: {
      • ‘cosine’: [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.0, . . . , 1.0, 0.5, 0.0]
      • ‘sine’: [0.0, 0.0, . . . , 0.0]

    • },

    • ‘integW2’: {
      • ‘cosine’: [0.0, 0.0, . . . , 0.0]
      • ‘sine’: [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.0, . . . , 1.0, 0.5, 0.0]

    • },


      }





A measurement statement, such as the one shown above, instructs the quantum controller 210 to: (1) Send the indicated pulse to the indicated element, manipulating the waveforms in the same manner that is described in the play statement section above; (2) After a time period time_of_flight (e.g., given in ns), samples the returning pulse at the quantum controller 210 input port/s that is/are connected to the output/s of the element. It saves the sampled data under stream_name (unless stream_name=None, in which case the sampled data will not be saved). The sampling time window will be of a duration that is the duration of the pulse plus twice the smearing (e.g., given in ns). This accounts for the returning pulse that is longer than the sent pulse due to the response of the quantum device, as well as for the cables and other elements in the pulse's path; and (3) Demodulate the sampled data with a frequency intermediate_frequency, defined in the definition of the element, perform weighted integration on the demodulated data with integration_weights that are defined in the quantum machine specification, and put the result in the indicated variable. The quantum controller 210 can perform multiple (e.g., 10 or more) demodulations and integrations at any given point in time, which may or may not be a part of the same measurement statement. The precise mathematical operation on the sampled data is:






variable
=



i




s
i

[



w
c
i



cos

(



ω
IF



t
i


+

ϕ
F


)


+


w
s
i



sin

(



ω
IF



t
i


+

ϕ
F


)



]







where si is the sampled data, ωIF is the intermediate_frequency, ϕF is the frame phase discussed in the z_rot statement below, and wci and wsi are the cosine and sine integration_weights. In an example implementation, the integration_weights are defined in a time resolution of 4 ns, while the sampling is done with time resolution of 1 ns (1 GSa/Sec sampling rate):

wc/s4i+wc/s4i+1+wc/s4i+2+wc/s4i+3


Compilation may include allocating specific resources of the quantum controller 210 to that quantum machine and then generating machine code that, when executed by quantum controller 210, will use those allocated resources.


The quantum machines manager 908 comprises circuitry operable to determine resources present in the quantum controller 210 and the availability of those resources at any given time. To determine the resources, the quantum machines manager 908 may be operable to read one or more configuration registers of the quantum controller 210, inspect a netlist of one or more circuits of the quantum controller 210, and/or parse hardware description language (HDL) source code used to define circuits of the quantum controller 210 and/or other files used to describe various configurations of the hardware and software components. Once the resources are determined, the quantum machines manager 908 may keep track of which resources are in use and which are available based on which quantum machines are “open” (i.e., in a state where some resources are reserved for that machine regardless of which, if any, quantum algorithm description that quantum machine is executing at that time), and/or which quantum algorithm descriptions are loaded into and/or being executed by the quantum controller 210 at that time. For example, referring briefly to FIG. 13A, during a time period where two quantum machines are open, each executing one of a first two quantum algorithms descriptions (QAD) (“Program 1” and “Program 2”), the system may be configured as shown in FIG. 13A and a data structure managed by the quantum machines manager 908 may reflect the situation as shown in Table 2.









TABLE 2







Example data structure maintained by


quantum machines manager










Resource
Status







Pulser 1
Allocated to program 2



Pulser 2
Allocated to program 2



Pulser 3
Allocated to program 1



Pulser 4
Available



Port 1
Allocated to QM2



Port 2
Available



Port 3
Allocated to QM2



Port 4
Allocated to QM1



Port 5
Allocated to QM1



Port 6
Allocated to QM2



Port 7
Allocated to QM1



Port 8
Allocated to QM1











During another time period where a single quantum machine is open and executing a third algorithm description (“Program 3”), the system may be configured as shown in FIG. 13B. The data structure managed by the quantum machines manager 908 may reflect the situation as shown in Table 3.









TABLE 3







Example data structure maintained by


quantum machines manager










Resource
Status







Pulser 1
Allocated to




program 3



Pulser 2
Allocated to




program 3



Pulser 3
Allocated to




program 3



Pulser 4
Allocated to




program 3



Port 1
Allocated to QM3



Port 2
Allocated to QM3



Port 3
Allocated to QM3



Port 4
Allocated to QM3



Port 5
Allocated to QM3



Port 6
Allocated to QM3



Port 7
Allocated to QM3



Port 8
Allocated to QM3










Table 4 below shows an example schema which uses Python as a host language the quantum machine specification is one or more Python dictionaries.









TABLE 4





Example quantum machine specification schema
















version
integer <int32>



schema version.








controllers
object



A collection of controllers. Each controller represents a control



and computation resource on the quantum controller 210



hardware.










property name*
object (controller)




specification of a single quantum control module. Here we




define its static properties.












analog_outputs
object





a collection of analog output ports and the properties





associated with them














property name*
object (quantum control module analog output port)






specification of the properties of a physical analog output port






of the quantum control module.
















offset
number







DC offset to output, range: (−0.5, 0.5). Will be applied only







when program runs.












digital_outputs
object














property name*
object (quantum control module digital port)

















specification of the properties of a physical digital output port







of the quantum control module.






offset
number












analog
object

















a collection of analog output ports and the properties







associated with them.














Property name*
object (quantum control module analog output port)

















specification of the properties of a physical analog output port







of the quantum control module.






offset
number







DC offset to output, range: (−0.5, 0.5). Will be applied only







when program runs.












type
string





Default: “opx1”




analog_inputs
object














Property name*
object (quantum control module analog input port)

















specification of the properties of a physical digital input port of







the quantum control module.






Offset
number








elements
object



A collection of quantum elements and/or external devices.



Each quantum element represents and describes a controlled



entity which is connected to the ports (analog input, analog



output and digital outputs) of the quantum control module.










property_name*
object (quantum element (QE))




specification of a single element. Here we define to which port




of the quantum control module the element is connected,




what is the RF frequency of the pulses sent and/or received




from this element












frequency
integer <int32>





resonance frequency [Hz]. Actual carrier frequency output by





the quantum control module to the input of this QE is





frequency - lo_frequency.




mixInputs
object (mixer input)





specification of the input of a QE which is driven by an IQ mixer














I
string






(tuple) of the form ((string) controller name, (int) controller






output/input port)





Q
string






(tuple) of the form ((string) controller name, (int) controller






output/input port)





mixer
string






the mixer used to drive the input of the QE, taken from the






names in mixers entry in the main quantum machine






specification





lo_frequency
integer <int32>






the frequency of the local oscillator which drives the mixer












outputs
object





collection of up to two output ports of QE. Keys: “out1” and





“out2”.














property_name*
string






(tuple) of the form ((string) controller name, (int) controller






output/input port)












intermediate_frequency
integer <int32>





intermediate frequency [Hz]. The actual frequency to be





output by the quantum control module to the input of this





element




measurement_qe
String





A reference to an element that has outputs (and thus can be





measured using the measurement command). This can be





specified for any element that does not have outputs so that





whenever a measurement command is used to measure this





elements, the actual measurement will be of the referenced





element.




smearing
integer <int32>





padding time, in nsec, to add to both the start and end of the





raw data streaming window during a measure command.




time_of_flight
integer <int32>





delay time [nsec] from start of pulse until output of QE reaches





quantum control module. Minimal value: 180. Used in measure





command, to determine the delay between the start of a





measurement pulse and the beginning of the demodulation





and/or raw data streaming window.




singleInput
object (single input)





specification of the input of a QE which has a single input port














port
string






(tuple) of the form ((string) controller name, (int) controller






output/input port)












operations
object





A collection of all pulse names to be used in play and measure





commands














property_name*
string






the name of the pulse as it appears under the “pulses” entry in






the quantum machine specification












digitalInputs
object














property_name*
object (digital input)






specification of the digital input of a QE
















port
string







(tuple) of the form ((string) controller name, (int) controller







output/input port)






delay
integer <int32>







the digital pulses played to this QE will be delayed by this







amount [nsec] relative to the analog pulses.







An intinsic negative delay of 143 +− 2nsec exists by default






output
string







(tuple) of the form ((string) controller name, (int) controller







output/input port)






buffer
integer <int32>







all digital pulses played to this QE will be convolved with a







digital pulse of value 1 with this length [nsec]








pulses
object



A collection of pulses to be played to the quantum elements.



In the case of a measurement pulse, the properties related to



the measurement are specified as well.










property_name*
object (pulse)




specification of a single pulse. Here we define its analog and




digital components, as well as properties related to




measurement associated with it.












integration_weights
object





if measurement pulse, a collection of integration weights





associated with this pulse,





to be applied to the data output from the QE and sent to the





controller.





Keys: name of integration weights to be used in the





measurement command.














property_name*
string






the name of the integration weights as it appears under the






“integration_weigths” entry in the quantum machine






specification












waveforms
object





a specification of the analog waveform to be played with this





pulse.





If associated element has singleInput, key is “single”.





If associated element has “mixInputs”, keys are “I” and “Q”.














property_name*
string






name of waveform to be played at the input port given in






associated keys












digital_marker
string





name of the digital marker to be played with this pulse




operation
string





type of operation. Possible values: control, measurement




length
integer <int32>





length of pulse [nsec]. Possible values: 16 to 4194304 in steps





of 4








waveforms
object



A collection of analog waveforms to be output when a pulse is



played. Here we specify their defining type (constant, arbitrary



or compressed) and their actual datapoints.










property_name*
arbitrary waveform (object) or constant waveform (object) or




compressed waveform (object)












type
‘arbitrary’ | ‘constant’ | ‘compressed’




samples
If type = ‘arbitrary’:





 Array of numbers <float>





 list of values of arbitrary waveforms, range: (−0.5, 0.5)





If type = ‘constant’:





 number <float>





 value of constant, range: (−0.5, 0.5)





If type = ‘compressed’:





 Array of numbers <float>





 Integer <int32>








digital_waveforms
object



A collection of digital waveforms to be output when a pulse is



played. Here we specify their actual datapoints.










property_name*
object (digital waveform)




raw data samples of a digital waveform












samples
Array of strings





(list of tuples) specifying the analog data according to following





code:





The first entry of each tuple is 0 or 1 and corresponds to the





digital value, and the second entry is the length in nsec to play





the value, in steps of 1. If value is 0, the value will be played to





end of pulse.








integration_weights
object



A collection of integration weight vectors used in the



demodulation of pulses returned from a quantum element.










property_name*
object (integration weights)




specification of a set of measurement integration weights.




Result of integration will be:




sum over i of (W_cosine[i]cos[wt[i]] +




W_sine[i]sin[wt[i]])analog[i].




Here:




w is the angular frequency of the quantum element, and




analog[i] is the analog data acquired by the controller.




W_cosine, W_sine are the vectors associated with the ‘cosine’




and ‘sine’ keys, respectively.




Note: the entries in the vector are specified in 4 nsec intervals,




and each entry is repeated four times during the




demodulation.




Example:




W_cosine = [2.0], W_sine = [0.0] will lead to the following




demodulation operation:




2.0(cos[wt[0]]analog[0] + cos[wt[1]]analog[1] +




cos[wt[2]]analog[2] + cos[wt[3]]analog[3])












sine
Array of numbers <float>





W_sine, a fixed-point vector of integration weights,





range: [−2048, 2048] in steps of 2**-15




cosine
Array of numbers <float>





W_cosine, a fixed-point vector of integration weights,





range: [−2048, 2048] in steps of 2**-15








mixers
object



A collection of IQ mixer calibration properties, used to post-



shape the pulse to compensate for imperfections in the mixers



used for upconverting the analog waveforms.










property_name*
Array of objects (mixer)












intermediate_frequency
integer <int32>





intermediate frequency associated with correction matrix




lo_freq
integer <int32>





local oscillator (LO) frequency associated with correction





matrix




correction
string





(tuple) a 2 × 2 matrix entered as a four-element tuple specifying





the correction matrix









Elements of the quantum processor, (e.g. qubits, resonators, flux lines, gates, etc.), external devices (e.g., oscilloscopes, spectrum analyzers, waveform generators, etc.), and/or any other element which is a part of a quantum machine and is connected to output and/or input ports of the controller 210, are defined using one or more of the other properties described in Table 4 and/or other similar properties which may be used in other implementations.


An example of other properties which may be used to specify an element are properties of a neural network that processes pulses sent to the element. For example, an element specification may specify that pulses sent to it are to be generates and/or processed by a neural network and the element definition may include one or more parameters specifying the number of layers of the neural network, the number of neurons of the neural network, the weights and biases for each neuron of the neural network, and/or other parameters familiar to those working with neural networks. The neural network having the specified parameters may then be trained during a calibration routine (e.g., at the beginning of execution of a QUA program).


For each element defined in a specification 902, the controller output and/or input ports to which it is connected are defined. During compilation, pulse modification settings for manipulating pulses intended for an element may be generated (for loading into pulse modification settings circuits 504) and the pulse modification setting circuit(s) 504 to which they will be loaded before execution may be chosen and may be allocated to the quantum machine on which the program is to be executed. Similarly, parameters and configurations of operations that will be performed on input signals related to an element (e.g. readout/measurement pulses) may be generated during compilation (for loading into compute and signal processing circuits 410). Likewise, the compute and signal processing circuit 410 in which they will be used may be chosen during compilation and may be allocated to the quantum machine on which the program is to be executed during compilation.


One example of an element that a quantum machine may contain is an IQ mixer that is connected to two output ports of the controller 210. To correct for mixer imbalances, the in-phase/quadrature (IQ) waveforms of the pulse can be multiplied by a 2λ2 mixer correction matrix before being sent to the output ports. This mixer correction matrix, determined via a calibration routine, may be frequency dependent. Thus, a mixer definition may include the mixer's name and a list of one or more frequencies and the correction matrix to be used at each frequency. In one example implementation, the correction matrix is loaded into corresponding pulse modification circuit during compilation. Similarly, an element definition may include an intermediate frequency with which every pulse sent to the element is to be modulated.


An example quantum machine specification file is described below with reference to FIGS. 10A-10C. While the example implementations we show here (including the one Table 4 refers to) show some possible properties that can be defined and specified in the quantum machine specification, it is not limited to these examples. For example, various filters and their parameters may be defined (e.g. FIR filter) to be performed on pulses to be played to certain elements and/or on input signals to the controller.


Pulses available for transmission by a quantum machine may be defined using one or more of the properties described in Table 4 and/or other similar properties which may be used in other implementations. Each pulse has a length. Each pulse is made of one or more waveforms. In one implementation there are two types of pulses: control pulses that are pulses that are only sent to the quantum system and will not be measured, and measurement pulses that are sent to the quantum system and will be measured upon return. The definition of a measurement pulse may specify parameters to be used for processing the measurement pulse upon its return from the element to which it was sent. Such parameters may include, for example, integration weights, parameters (e.g., number of layers, number of neurons, weights and biases, and/or the like) of a neural network, parameters (e.g., number of taps and tap coefficients) of a FIR filter, and/or the like. During compilation, pulse definitions may be used to, for example: generate pulse templates to load into pulse template memory 404; generate instructions to be loaded into instruction memory 402 and/or compute and signal processing circuit 410 for retrieving and manipulating the contents of pulse template memory 404 to achieve the defined pulses; and/or generate one or more classical processor programs to be executed by compute and signal processing circuit 410 for processing readout/measurement pulses.



FIGS. 10A-10C show an example quantum machine specification. The example shown uses Python as a host language. The example quantum machine specification is a Python dictionary with a key of “config” and a value that comprises a plurality of nested objects, some of which are key-value pairs and some of which are nested dictionaries.


The “version” key-value pair which indicates the version of the quantum machine specification schema being used.


The “controllers” object is used to specify the number of modules/units that make up the quantum controller 210 of the quantum machine. The example shown specifies just a single quantum control module named “con1”, which is of type “opx1” (different opx types may, for example, indicated different hardware and/or configuration of the hardware). For each controller 210, the output and input ports that are used in the quantum machine are specified. For analog outputs and inputs, DC offset voltage is specified as well.


The “elements” object is used to specify elements that are connected to output and input ports of the controller 210. Such elements may include quantum elements (e.g., qubits, readout resonators, flux lines, etc.), external devices (e.g., test equipment such as oscilloscopes, spectrum analyzers, signal generators, etc.), and/or any other element connected to the output and/or input ports of the controller. The example shown in FIG. 10A specifies a qubit named “qubit” and a readout resonator named “RR”. The “qubit” element comprises “mixinputs”, “operations”, and “frequency” objects. The “mixinputs” object comprises “I”, “Q”, “lo_frequency”, and “mixer” objects. The “I” and “Q” objects specify the corresponding output ports of “con1” to which the inputs of the element are connected. The “intermediate_frequency” object specifies the intermediate frequency with which pulses sent to the qubit are to be modulated (e.g., determined from a qubit calibration routine). The “mixer” object refers to mixer object “mixer_quibit,” which is defined later in the quantum machine specification. The “operations” object specifies a “gauss-pulse” which refers to the “gauss_pulse_in” object is defined later in the quantum machine specification. The “RR” element comprises “mixinputs”, “operations”, “outputs”, “frequency”, “time_of_flight”, and “smearing” objects. The “mixinputs” object comprises “I”, “Q”, “lo_frequency”, and “mixer” objects. The “I” and “Q” objects specify the corresponding ports of “con1”. The “frequency” object specifies the frequency of the readout_resonator (e.g., determined from a qubit calibration routine). The “mixer” object refers to mixer object “mixer_res,” which is defined later in the quantum machine specification. The “operations” object specifies a “meas_pulse” which refers to the “meas_pulse_in” object is defined later in the quantum machine specification. The “time_of_flight” and “smearing” objects specify those values for the readout resonator. The “outputs” object specifies an output on the element “out1” and the corresponding input port of “con1” to which it is connected.


The “Pulses” object is used to specify pulses available for transmission by the quantum machine. The example shown specifies two pulses: “means_pulse_in” and “gauss_pulse_in.” The “means_pulse_in” object in turn comprises “operation”, “length”, “waveforms”, “integration_weights”, and “digital_marker” objects. The “operation” object specifies it as a “measurement” pulse. The “I” and “Q” objects of the “waveforms” object refer to the “exc_wf” and “zero_wf” objects which are defined later in the quantum machine specification. The “integration_weights” object refers to the integration weights objects “integW1” and “integW2” which are defined later in the specification. The “digital_marker” object refers to the “marker1” object defined later in the specification.


The “gauss_pulse_in” object comprises “operation”, “length”, and “waveforms” objects. The “operation” object specifies it is a “control” pulse. The “I” and “Q” objects of the “waveforms” object refer to the “gauss_wf” and “zero_wf” objects which are defined later in the quantum machine specification.


The “waveforms” object defines the “zero_wf”, “gauss_wf”, and “exc_wf” objects (“exc_wf” not shown) using “type” and “samples” objects.


The “digital_waveforms” defines the “marker1” object using a “samples” object.


The “integration_weights” object defines the objects “integW1” and “integW2” using “cosine” and “sine” objects.


The “mixers” object defines the “mixer_res” and “mixer_qubit” objects using “freq”, “lo_freq”, and “correction” objects.



FIG. 11 is a flow chart showing an example process for operation of the quantum orchestration platform. The process begins in block 1102 in which one or more quantum control modules are connected together to form quantum controller 210 and the quantum controller 210 is connected to a quantum system. In this regard, the quantum controller 210 is modular and extendable enabling use of as many units as desired/necessary for the quantum algorithm to be performed. Each of the modules may, for example, comprise one or more of each of the circuits shown in FIG. 3B.


In block 1103, a quantum machine with a certain specification is instantiated by a user. This may be done via a Quantum Machines Manager API. In an example of such an API, shown in Table 5, this may include a call to the open_qm( ) function or the open_qm_from_file( ) function.









TABLE 5





Quantum Machines Manager API















Class QuantumMachinesManager (host=None, port=None, **kargs)


 close_all_quantum_machines( )


  Closes ALL open quantum machines


 get_controllers( )


  Returns a list of all the quantum control modules that are available


 get_qm(machine_id)


  Gets an open quantum machine object with the given machine id


  Parameters









machine_id - The id of the open quantum machine to get







  Returns









A quantum machine obj that can be used to execute programs







 list_open_quantum_machines( )


  Return a list of open quantum machines. (Returns only the ids, use get_qm(...) to get


  the machine object)


  Returns


  The ids list


 open_qm(config, close_other_machines=True) →


 qm.QuantumMachine.QuantumMachine


  Opens a new quantum machine


  Parameters









config - The config that will be used by the name machine



close_other_machines - Flag whether to close all other running machines







  Returns









A quantum machine obj that can be used to execute programs







 open_qm_from_file(filename, close_other_machines=True)


  Opens a new quantum machine with config taken from a file on the local file system


  Parameters









filename - The path to the file that contains the config



close_other_machines - Flag whether to close all other running machines







  Returns









A quantum machine obj that can be used to execute programs







 perform_healthcheck(strict=True)


  Perform a health check against the QM programming subsystem.


  Parameters









strict - Will raise an exception if health check failed







 version( )


  Returns









The QM programming subsystem version









In block 1104, the quantum machines manager 908 attempts to allocate machine resources (i.e., resources allocated to a particular quantum machine regardless of whether a quantum algorithm description is currently executing on that quantum machine) of the quantum controller 210 to the new quantum machine according to the specification.


In block 1105, the quantum machines manager 908 determines whether the allocation and instantiation is successful. If not, then in block 1122 an alert is generated for the user (e.g., to inform the user that there are currently insufficient resources available to instantiate the required quantum machine). If allocation is successful, then in block 1106 the allocated resources are stored in quantum machines manager 908, which updates its data structure of available resources to reflect the allocation of resources to the quantum machine, the new quantum machine is instantiated, and the process advances to block 1107.


In block 1107, a user requests to execute a QUA program on the quantum machine. This may be done via a Quantum Machine API. In an example of such an API, shown in Table 6, this may include a call to the execute( ) function. Prior to the request to execute the QUA program, and/or during the execution of the QUA program, the user can use a Quantum Machine API, such as the one shown below in table 6, to alter any parameter that was set in the specification 902. This is advantageous where, for example, something (e.g., temperature, voltage, equipment in use, and/or any other factor that may impact a quantum experiment), has changed since the time the specification 902 was generated.









TABLE 6





Quantum Machine API















Class QuantumMachine (machine_id, pb_config, config, manager)


 close( )


 Closes the quantum machine.









Returns



True if the close request succeeded, Raises an exception otherwise.







 execute(pragram, duration_limit=1000, data_limit=20000, force_execution=False, dry_run=


 False, **kwargs) → qm.QmJob.QmJob









Executes a program and returns a job object to keep track of execution and get results.



Parameters











program - A program( ) object generated in QUA to execute




duration_limit (int) - Maximal time (in msec) for which results will be collected.




data_limit (int) -




Maximal amount of data sends for which results will be collected.




Here data sends is either:










1.
4 ADC samples, in case raw data is transferred



2.
a single save operation











force_execution (bool) - Execute program even if warnings occur (verify this)




dry_run (bool) - compile program but do not run it (verify this)









No new results will be available to the returned job object When duration_limit is reached,



or when data_limit is reached, whichever occurs sooner.



Returns



A QmJob object that can be used to keep track of the execution and get results







 get_config( )









Gives the current config of the qm



Returns



A dictionary with the qm's config







 get_dc_offset_by_qe(qe, input)









get the current DC offset of the quantum control module analog output channel



associated with a quantum element. ** remove ** note: not currently implemented.



Parameters











qe - the name of the element to get the correction for




input - the input name as appears in the element's config be more specific here




Returns









the offset, in normalized output units







 get_digital_buffer(qe, digital_input)









get the buffer for digital waveforms of the quantum element



Parameters











qe (str) - the name of the element to get the buffer for




digital_input (str) - the digital input name as appears in the element's config




Returns









the buffer







 get_digital_delay(qe, digital_input)









Parameters











qe - the name of the element to get the delay for




digital_input - the digital input name as appears in the element's config




Returns









the delay



get_io1_value( )



Gives the data stored in OI1



No inference is made on type.



Returns



A dictionary with data stored in IO1. (Data is in all three format: int, float, bool)







 get_io2_value( )









Gives the data stored in IO2



No inference is made on type.



Returns



A dictionary with data from the second IO register. (Data is in all three format: int, float,



and bool)







 get_io_values( )









Gives the data stored In both IO1 and IO2



No inference is made on type.



Returns



A list that contains dictionaries with data from the IO registers. (Data is in all three



format: int, float, and bool)







 get_smearing(qe)









get the smearing associated with a measurement quantum element.



This is a broadening of the raw results acquisition window, to account for dispersive



broadening in the measurement elements (readout resonators etc.) The acquisition



window will be broadened by this amount on both sides.



Parameters



qe (str) - the name of the element to get smearing for



Returns



the smearing, in nsec.







 get_time_of_flight(qe)









get the time of flight, associated with a measurement quantum element.



This is the amount of time between the beginning of a measurement pulse applied to



quantum element and the time that the data is available to the controller for



demodulation or streaming.



Parameters



qe (str) - the name of the element to get time of flight for



Returns



the time of flight, in nsec







 list_controllers( )









Gives a list with the defined controllers in this qm



Returns



The names of the controllers configured in this qm







 save_config_to_file(filename)









Saves the qm current config to a file



Parameters



filename: The name of the file where the config will be saved







 set_correction(qe, values)


 Sets the correction matrix for correcting gain and phase imbalances of an IQ mixer associated


 with a quantum element.


 Parameters









qe (str) - the name of the element to update the correction for



values (tuple) - 4 value tuple which represents the correction matrix







 set_dc_offset_by_qe(qe, input, offset)









set the current DC offset of the quantum control module analog output channel



associated with a quantum element.



Parameters











qe (str) - the name of the element to update the correction for




input (str) - the input name as appears in the element config. Options:









’single’



 for an element with single input



’I’ or ‘Q’



 for an element with mixer inputs











offset (float) - the dc value to set to, in normalized output units. Ranges from −0.5




to 0.5 - 2{circumflex over ( )}−16 in steps of 2{circumflex over ( )}−16.







 set_digital_buffer(qe, digital_input, buffer)









set the buffer for digital waveforms of the quantum element



Parameters











qe (str) - the name of the element to update buffer for




digital_input (str) - the digital input name as appears in the element's config




buffer (int) - the buffer value to set to, in nsec. Range: 0 to (255 − delay) / 2, in




steps of 1







 set_digital_delay(qe, digital_input, delay)









Sets the delay of the digital waveform of the quantum element



Parameters











qe (str) - the name of the element to update delay for




digital_input (str) - the digital input name as appears in the element's config




delay (int) - the delay value to set to, in nsec. Range: 0 to 255 − 2 * buffer, in




steps of 1







 set_frequency(qe, freq)









Sets the frequency of an element, at the output of the mixer, taking LO frequency into



account.



Parameters











qe (str) - the name of the element to update the correction for




freq (float) - the frequency to set to the given element







 set_intermediate_frequency(qe, freq)









Sets the intermediate frequency of the quantum element:



Parameters











qe (str) - the name of the element to update the intermediate frequency for




freq (float) - the intermediate frequency to set to the given element







 set_io1_value(value_1)









Sets the value of IO1.



This can be used later inside a QUA program as a QUA variable IO1 without declaration.



The type of QUA variable is inferred from the python type passed to value_1, according



to the following rule:



int −> int float −> fixed bool −> bool



Parameters



value_1 (float | bool | int) - the value to be placed in IO1







 set_io2_value(value_2)









Sets the value of IO1



This can be used later inside a QUA program as a QUA variable IO2 without declaration.



The type of QUA variable is inferred from the python type passed to value_2, according



to the following rule:



int −> int float −> fixed bool −> bool



Parameters



value_1 (float | bool | int) - the value to be placed in IO1







 set_io_values(value_1, value_2)









Sets the value of IO1 and IO2



This can be used later inside a QUA program as a QUA variable IO1, IO2 without



declaration. The type of QUA variable is inferred from the python type passed to



value_1, value_2 according to the following rule:



int −> int float −> fixed bool −> bool



Parameters











value_1 (float | bool | int) - the value to be placed in IO1




value_2 (float | bool | int) - the value to be placed in IO2







 set_smearing(ge, smearing)









set the smearing associated with a measurement quantum element.



This is a broadening of the raw results acquisition window, to account for dispersive



broadening in the measurement elements (readout resonators etc.) The acquisition



window will be broadened by this amount on both sides.



Parameters











qe (str) - the name of the element to set smearing for




smearing (int) - the time, in nsec, to broaden the acquisition window. Range: 0 to




(255 − time of flight)/2, in steps of 1.







 set_time_of_flight(qe, time_of_flight)









set the time of flight, associated with a measurement quantum element.



This is the amount of time between the beginning of a measurement pulse applied to



quantum element and the time that the data is available to the controller for



demodulation or streaming.



This time also accounts for processing delays, which are typically 176nsec.



Parameters











qe (str) - the name of the element to set time of flight for




time_of_flight (int) - the time of flight to set, in nsec. Range: 0 to 255 − 2 *




smearing, in steps of 4.









In block 1108, compiler 906 receives the quantum machine specification and the QUA program (e.g., in the form of two plain text files).


In block 1109, compiler 906 attempts to compile the program using the quantum machine specification and the resources of the quantum controller 210 that the quantum machines manager 908 indicates are available for program execution. During compilation, the compiler determines and allocates the program resources of the quantum controller 210 that will be used in the program.


In block 1110, the compiler 906 determines whether compilation is successful. If not, then in block 1122 an alert is generated for the user (e.g., to inform the user that there are currently insufficient resources available to execute the program). If compilation is successful, then the process advances to block 1112. If compilation is successful the compiler outputs the machine code to be loaded to the quantum controller for program execution.


In block 1112, the programming system 202 loads machine code generated by the compiler 906 based on the program, the quantum machine specification, and the available resources into quantum controller 210 (e.g., via I/O Manager 368).


In block 1114, the programming subsystem 202 determines whether the machine code has been successfully loaded into the quantum controller 210. If not, then in block 1122 an alert is generated for the user. If the machine code is successfully loaded, then the process advances to block 1116.


In block 1116, the program is executed on the quantum controller and the quantum machines manager 908 updates its data structure of available resources to reflect the allocation of resources to the program.


Either while the program is executing and/or after the program execution is over, the user may change the configuration/specification of the quantum machine. This may be done via a Quantum Machine API, an example implementation of which is shown in Table 6. An example of changing the configuration/specification of the quantum machine may be that the user uses the call to the set_frequency(qe, freq) function, which changes the frequency of the specified element to the specified frequency. In another example implementation such quantum machines API may include commands for changing any parameter defined in the specification (e.g. an API command may allow to change the definition of the samples of a specified waveform, change the parameters of a neural network associated with an element or a pulse, etc.) If the specification is changed while a program is running on the quantum machine, this may include writing to registers and/or memory of the quantum controller 210 while the program is executing as well as changing the specification in the quantum machines manager. If the specification is changed while no program is running on the quantum machine, this may include only changing the specification in the quantum machines manager. The ability to alter characteristics of the quantum machine without closing the quantum machine and even during execution of a QUA program on the quantum machine enables, for example, altering the quantum machine based on calculations performed on the quantum programming subsystem 202. As an example, during execution of a QUA program, results may be streamed from the quantum controller 210 to the quantum programming subsystem 202, the quantum programming subsystem 202 may perform some calculations using the results (e.g., resource-intensive calculations not possible or desirable to perform on the quantum controller 210) and then update the quantum machine based on the calculations. The update may impact the currently running QUA program or a successive run of the same QUA program or a different QUA program without having to close the quantum machine for reconfiguration (which may be desirable to, for example, avoid having to repeat a calibration).


In block 1118, upon completing execution of the instructions, the program ends and the quantum machines manager 908 updates its data structure to deallocate the program resources that were allocated to that program and updates the available resources.


In block 1120, the process can advance either back to block 1107 again in which a user a user requests to execute a QUA program on the quantum machine, or to block 1124 in which a user closes the quantum machine. If the user closes the quantum machine the process advances to block 1126.


In block 1126 the quantum machines manager 908 deallocate the machine resources that were allocated to that quantum machine and updates the available resources.


In an example implementation, the pulse generation program 904 is written using the QUA programming language.


To aid understanding of the QOP's unique approach to quantum control, a use case example of Power Rabi Calibration will now be described, end-to-end. The use case begins by discussing the theoretical background of the experiment and its goals and showing a typical setup on which it is implemented. It is then shown, step by step, how to program the QOP to perform this experiment, how to execute it, and how to retrieve the results.


The purpose of Power Rabi Calibration is to measure Rabi oscillations—oscillations of the qubit state that are driven by a control signal. Assume that the qubit is initially in the ground state (state 0), a drive pulse is applied to rotate the qubit on the Bloch sphere around a rotation axis in the x-y plane. The qubit is then measured by calculating the effect of the resonator (that is coupled to the qubit) on a measurement pulse. The rotation angle, and consequently the probability to find the qubit in the excited state (1), depends on the amplitude of the drive pulse. The protocol is repeated with varying amplitudes (a). For each amplitude, the protocol is repeated many times for averaging, which allows extracting the probability of the qubit to be in the excited state after the drive pulse is applied. This probability is then plotted as a function of the drive amplitude, from which the rotation angle, as a function of the amplitude, can be extracted. This experiment provides an important tool for calibrating quantum gates. For example, the amplitude at which the qubit reaches a rotation of 180 degrees gives us the required amplitude for performing an X-gate (the quantum NOT gate). Similarly, this program can be run to identify the amplitude required to perform a π/2-rotation.


The example experiment setup is shown in FIG. 12A. The quantum device is a superconducting circuit composed of a single, fixed frequency qubit and a readout resonator, with the following Hamiltonian:






H
=




2



ω
Q



σ
Z


+




ω
R



a



a

+





g

(



a




σ
-


+

a


σ
+



)

.







Since the interaction between the qubit and resonator is dispersive (|ωR−ωQ|), an approximation can be made that leads to the following form of the Hamiltonian:






H
=




2



(


ω
Q

+


g
2

Δ


)




σ
Z


+





(


ω
R

+



g
2

Δ



σ
Z



)



a



a







Where Δ=ωQ−ωR. Finally, the qubit driving term can be explicitly included, which leads to the Hamiltonian:






H
=


H
0

+




s

(
t
)



σ

x
·



+



m

(
t
)

2

[



a




e


-
i


ω

t



+

ae

i

ω

t



]






Here it is assumed that the frequencies of both the qubit and the resonator were calibrated in advance.


A signal, at the resonance frequency of the qubit, of the form

s(t)=A cos(ωQt+ϕ)

rotates the Bloch vector of the qubit at a rate A around the axis which is on the x-y plane and is rotated by an angle φ from the x-axis.


If the parameters A(t) and φ(t) are varied slowly compared to ωQ, then this still holds at each point in time. Thus, if a pulse is sent (i.e. a signal that is finite in time) to the qubit of the form

s(t)=A(t)cos(ωQt+ϕ)

where A(t) varies slowly compared to ωQ, the Bloch vector will be rotated around the above axis by a total angle which is given by the integral of A(t):






θ
=




t
0



t
0

+
τ




A

(
t
)



dt
.








Here t0 is the time at which the pulse starts and τ is the duration of the pulse.


In a typical Power Rabi Oscillations experiment, the shape and duration of the pulse A(t) are fixed (e.g. a 20-nanosecond gaussian pulse) and only its amplitude is varied in order to get different rotation angles θ. The experiment performed by repeating the following basic sequence:

    • (1) Initialize the qubit to the ground state, 0.
    • (2) Apply a pulse with amplitude a (e.g. A(t) is a Gaussian shaped pulse with peak amplitude a, which rotates the qubit by θ so that the qubit is in the state

      cos(θa)|0custom character+e sin(θa)|1custom character.
    • (3) Apply a resonant pulse to the readout resonator, and from the phase of the reflected pulse, deduce the state of the qubit.


This basic sequence is repeated in the program for a series of amplitudes (i.e., many values of a), where for each amplitude, a, it is repeated N times (i.e. N identical basic sequences with the same a). N identical measurements are required because of state collapse. The measurement at the end of each basic sequence gives a binary result (0 or 1) for the state of the qubit, even if before the measurement the qubit was in a superposition state. However, when the results of the N identical basic sequences are averaged, the average will be ˜sin2(θ). Denote this average as P|1custom character(a) since it reflects the probability of measuring the qubit in the |1custom character state for a given amplitude, a. The results of the whole experiment can be summarized by plotting P|1custom character(a) as a function of a (see FIG. 12B).


This can be used to calibrate any single qubit rotation gate that rotates the qubit by an angle θ, around a rotation axis that is on the x-y plane and is rotated φ from the x-axis. Such a gate is denoted by Rϕ(θ). In fact, one of the typical goals of the Power Rabi Oscillations experiment is to calibrate the amplitude of a given pulse so that it performs n-rotation (X-gate) or π/2-rotation. φ, however, cannot be determined from the Rabi oscillations and must be determined by other means (e.g. tomography).


An example implementation of the Power Rabi experiment in the QOP will now be described.


The experiment is implemented on the QOP as follows: (1) Defining a quantum machine specification; (2) Opening an interface to the quantum machine; (3) Writing the program; (4) Running the program; (5) Saving the results


As discussed above, the quantum machine specification is a description of the physical elements present in the experimental setup and their properties, as well as the connectivity between the elements and the quantum control module(s). The physical elements that are connected to the quantum control module(s) are denoted in the quantum machine specification as elements, which are discrete entities such as qubits, readout resonators, flux lines, gate electrodes, etc. Each of these has inputs and in some cases outputs, connected to the quantum control module(s). The properties of the elements and their connectivity to the quantum control module(s) are used by the QOP to interpret and execute QUA programs correctly (e.g. a pulse played to a certain qubit is modulated by the quantum control module with the intermediate frequency defined for this element). The quantum machine specification in FIGS. 10A-10C is used for this particular example.


The pulses applied to the elements are also specified in the quantum machine specification, where each pulse is defined as a collection of temporal waveforms. For example, a pulse to an element with two analog inputs and one digital input will specify the two waveforms applied to the analog inputs of the element and the digital pulse applied to its digital input.


Also defined in the quantum machine specification are the properties of any auxiliary components that affect the actual output of the controller, such as IQ mixers and local oscillators.


After defining the quantum machine specification, an interface to a new quantum machine can be opened with the following command:

    • my_qm=qmManager.open_qm(my_config)


After having defined the quantum machine specification, write the QUA program. Below is the power Rabi program.

    • with program( ) as powerRabiProg:
      • I=declare(fixed)
      • Q=declare(fixed)
      • a=declare(fixed)
      • Nrep=declare(int)
      • with for_(Nrep, 0, Nrep<100, Nrep+1):
        • with for_(a, 0.00, a<=1.0, a+0.01):
          • play(‘gauss_pulse’*amp(a), ‘qubit’)
          • align(“qubit”, “RR”)
          • measure(‘meas_pulse’, ‘RR’, ‘samples’,(‘integW1’,I), (‘integW2’,Q))
          • save(I, ‘I’)
          • save(Q, ‘Q’)
          • save(a, ‘a’)


The program is very intuitive to someone who knows the theory of the Power Rabi calibration, which illustrates one of the benefits of the QOP: the ability for people (e.g., quantum physicists) to rapidly design and run quantum experiments without first having to become expert programmers or computer systems designers. This is in stark contrast to current systems which, for example, require quantum physicists to learn a hardware description language such as VHDL or Verilog to be able to run their quantum experiments/algorithms.


This program: (1) Defines the variables a (amplitude) and Nrep (number of repetitions), as well as the variables i and Q, which store the demodulation result; and (2) Performs 100 repetitions (the loop over Nrep), where in each scan loops over 100 values of a, from 0-1 in increments of 0.01 and for each value of a performs the Rabi sequence: playing a pulse with amplitude a to the qubit, then measuring the resonator response and extracting from it the state of the qubit. This is done by sending a measurement pulse to the resonator and demodulating and integrating the returning pulse using the indicated integration weights.


The raw data sampled at the quantum control module's input is also streamed and saved with the label ‘samples.’ Finally, the demodulation and integration results, I and Q, are saved as well as the corresponding amplitude.


This Python code block creates an object named powerRabiProg, which is a QUA program that can be executed on an open quantum machine.


The program is run on a quantum machine “my_qm” defined in the quantum machine specification using the following command which saves the results in the job object “my_job.”

    • my_job=my_qm.execute(powerRabiProg)


After the program is executed, the results can be pulled:

    • my_powerRabi_results=job.get_results( )


This command pulls the results from “my_job” to the results object “my_powerRabi_results”.


The data in “my_powerRabi_results” is a Python object which contains the variables saved during the program, as well as all the raw data sampled at the input of the quantum control module. Here, “my_powerRabi_results” will have: (1) my_powerRabi_results.variable_results, which will be a dictionary containing three keys: ‘I’, ‘Q’ and ‘a’. The value for each key will be a dictionary containing the saved data and the time stamp for each saved data point; (2) my_powerRabi_results.raw_results, which will be a dictionary containing a single key and its value will be a dictionary containing the sampled input data and the timestamp of each data point.


In accordance with an example implementation of this disclosure, a system comprises pulse generation and measurement circuitry (e.g., 210) comprising a plurality of pulse generator circuits (e.g., 302) and a plurality of ports (e.g., ports of signal path(s) 304, 306, and/or 308), and management circuitry (e.g., 202 and part of 210). The management circuitry is operable to analyze a specification of a control system and controlled elements (e.g., specification 902) that comprises a definition of a controlled element of the control system, and a definition of one or more pulses available for transmission by the control system. The management circuitry is operable to configure, based on the specification, the pulse generation and measurement circuitry to: generate the one or more pulses via one or more of the plurality of pulse generator circuits; and output the one or more pulses to the controlled element via one or more of the plurality of ports. The configuration of the pulse generation and measurement circuitry may comprise generation of one or more pulse modification settings and storage of the one or more pulse modification settings to pulse modification circuitry (e.g., 5040-504K−1) of the pulse generation and measurement circuitry. The configuration of the pulse generation and measurement circuitry may comprise generation of pulse templates and storage of the pulse templates to pulse memory (404) of the pulse generation and measurement circuitry. The configuration of the pulse generation and measurement circuitry may comprise generation of instructions for a processor (e.g., 410) of the pulse generation and modification circuitry to perform classical computations and storage of the instructions to the processor. The configuration of the pulse generation and measurement circuitry may comprise generation of digital signal processing path configuration settings and storage of the digital signal processing path configuration settings to digital signal generation circuitry (e.g., 376) of the pulse generation and measurement circuitry. The definition of the controlled element may specify whether the controlled element is to be controlled with independent pulses or with two-pair pulses (e.g., via “singleInput” and “mixInputs” properties). The definition of the controlled element may specify a frequency with which pulses sent to the controlled element are to be modulated (e.g., via an “intermediate_frequency” property). The definition of the controlled element may specify which of the one or more pulses are to be available for transmission to the controlled element (e.g., via an “operations” property). The definition of the controlled element may specify which of the plurality of ports are connected to which of one or more inputs of the controlled element of the first control system (e.g., via “mixinputs” or “singleInput” properties). The definition of the controlled element may specify whether the controlled element has an output (e.g., via an “outputs” property), and, if the controlled element has an output, one or more timing parameters to be used for receiving signals from the controlled element (e.g., via “smearing” and/or “time-of-flight” property). The one or more timing parameters determine, at least in part, one or both of: a duration of an acquisition window; and a delay between when a pulse is transmitted to the controlled element and when measurement of a signal from the controlled element should begin. The definition of the controlled element may specify one or more digital inputs of the controlled element (e.g., via a “digital inputs” property). The definition of the controlled element may specify a delay between a send time of a pulse destined for the controlled element and a send time of a digital signal accompanying the pulse destined for the controlled element (e.g., via a “delay” property). The definition of the controlled element may specify convolution parameters and/or delay parameters for use with digital signals sent to the controlled element (e.g., via a “buffer”. The definition of the controlled element may specify a circuit element associated with the controlled element (e.g., in the signal path to the controlled element), The circuit element may be a of particular type (e.g., a mixer) specified by a property named after the type of circuit (e.g., “mixer”)). The control system specification comprises a definition of the circuit element, and the definition of the circuit element may comprise a parameter for compensating for nonidealities of the circuit element (e.g., a mixer correction matrix). The definition of the one or more pulses may specify one or more parameters to be used for processing signals from the controlled element (e.g., integration weights, a filter transfer function, etc.). The specification may comprise a definition of the one or more parameters, which may take the form of a plurality of vectors. The definition of the one or more pulses may specify one or more waveforms to be used for generation of the one or more pulses (e.g., via a “waveforms” property). The specification may comprise a definition of the one or more waveforms. The definition of the one or more waveforms which may take the form of a collection (e.g., list, string, array, etc.) of samples of the one or more waveforms. The definition of the one or more pulses may specify one or more digital signals that are to be output along with the one or more pulses. The specification may comprise a definition of the one or more digital signals. The definition of the one or more digital signals may specify the digital values of the one or more digital signals and how long each of the digital values is to be output. The management circuitry may be operable to receive commands via an application programming interface (e.g., a quantum machine API, an example of which is shown in Table 6), and the configuration may be based on the commands such that the commands supplement the specification and/or override one or more definitions in the specification.


The present method and/or system may be realized in hardware, software, or a combination of hardware and software. The present methods and/or systems may be realized in a centralized fashion in at least one computing system, or in a distributed fashion where different elements are spread across several interconnected computing systems. Any kind of computing system or other apparatus adapted for carrying out the methods described herein is suited. A typical implementation may comprise one or more application specific integrated circuit (ASIC), one or more field programmable gate array (FPGA), and/or one or more processor (e.g., x86, x64, ARM, PIC, and/or any other suitable processor architecture) and associated supporting circuitry (e.g., storage, DRAM, FLASH, bus interface circuits, etc.). Each discrete ASIC, FPGA, Processor, or other circuit may be referred to as “chip,” and multiple such circuits may be referred to as a “chipset.” Another implementation may comprise a non-transitory machine-readable (e.g., computer readable) medium (e.g., FLASH drive, optical disk, magnetic storage disk, or the like) having stored thereon one or more lines of code that, when executed by a machine, cause the machine to perform processes as described in this disclosure. Another implementation may comprise a non-transitory machine-readable (e.g., computer readable) medium (e.g., FLASH drive, optical disk, magnetic storage disk, or the like) having stored thereon one or more lines of code that, when executed by a machine, cause the machine to be configured (e.g., to load software and/or firmware into its circuits) to operate as a system described in this disclosure.


As used herein the terms “circuits” and “circuitry” refer to physical electronic components (i.e. hardware) and any software and/or firmware (“code”) which may configure the hardware, be executed by the hardware, and or otherwise be associated with the hardware. As used herein, for example, a particular processor and memory may comprise a first “circuit” when executing a first one or more lines of code and may comprise a second “circuit” when executing a second one or more lines of code. As used herein, “and/or” means any one or more of the items in the list joined by “and/or”. As an example, “x and/or y” means any element of the three-element set {(x), (y), (x, y)}. As another example, “x, y, and/or z” means any element of the seven-element set {(x), (y), (z), (x, y), (x, z), (y, z), (x, y, z)}. As used herein, the term “exemplary” means serving as a non-limiting example, instance, or illustration. As used herein, the terms “e.g.,” and “for example” set off lists of one or more non-limiting examples, instances, or illustrations. As used herein, circuitry is “operable” to perform a function whenever the circuitry comprises the necessary hardware and code (if any is necessary) to perform the function, regardless of whether performance of the function is disabled or not enabled (e.g., by a user-configurable setting, factory trim, etc.). As used herein, the term “based on” means “based at least in part on.” For example, “x based on y” means that “x” is based at least in part on “y” (and may also be based on z, for example).


While the present method and/or system has been described with reference to certain implementations, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that various changes may be made and equivalents may be substituted without departing from the scope of the present method and/or system. In addition, many modifications may be made to adapt a particular situation or material to the teachings of the present disclosure without departing from its scope. Therefore, it is intended that the present method and/or system not be limited to the particular implementations disclosed, but that the present method and/or system will include all implementations falling within the scope of the appended claims.

Claims
  • 1. A system comprising: a pulse generator circuit, comprising a plurality of output ports, wherein: the pulse generator circuit is configured according to a definition of one or more pulses and a selection of one or more output ports of the plurality of output ports,the pulse generator circuit is operable to output the one or more pulses from the one or more output ports,an RF signal is generated according to the one or more pulses, andthe RF signal is configured to interact with a quantum element.
  • 2. The system of claim 1, wherein the system comprises a pulse modification circuit operably coupled between the pulse generator circuit and the quantum element, wherein the pulse modification circuit is configurable according to one or more pulse modification settings.
  • 3. The system of claim 1, wherein the system comprises a pulse memory operable to store a pulse template, and wherein the pulse template is used to configure the pulse generator circuit.
  • 4. The system of claim 1, wherein the system comprises a processor that is operable to perform classical computations, and wherein the configuration of the pulse generator circuit comprises generation of instructions for the processor.
  • 5. The system of claim 1, wherein the configuration of the pulse generator circuit comprises a generation of instructions to be executed by the pulse generator circuit.
  • 6. The system of claim 1, wherein the system comprises a digital signal generator, and wherein the configuration of the pulse generator circuit comprises a generation of digital signal processing settings for the digital signal generator.
  • 7. The system of claim 1, wherein: the configuration of the pulse generator circuit is based on whether the quantum element is to be controlled with independent pulses or with two-pair pulses.
  • 8. The system of claim 1, wherein the one or more pulses are modulated on a selectable frequency.
  • 9. The system of claim 1, wherein the configuration of the pulse generator circuit operates according to one or more timing parameters, and wherein the one or more timing parameters are used for receiving signals from the quantum element.
  • 10. The system of claim 9, wherein the one or more timing parameters determine, at least in part, one or both of a duration of an acquisition window and a delay between when a pulse is transmitted to the quantum element and when measurement of a signal from the quantum element should begin.
  • 11. The system of claim 1, wherein the configuration of the pulse generator circuit uses the one or more digital inputs.
  • 12. The system of claim 1, wherein the configuration of the pulse generator circuit uses a convolution parameter and/or a delay parameter.
  • 13. The system of claim 1, wherein the system comprises a mixer operably coupled between the pulse generator circuit and the quantum element.
  • 14. The system of claim 13, wherein the mixer is configurable according to a mixer correction matrix.
  • 15. The system of claim 1, wherein the pulse generator circuit are configured according to a plurality of vectors.
  • 16. The system of claim 1, wherein the pulse generator circuit are configured according to one or more parameters of a neural network.
  • 17. The system of claim 1, wherein the one or more pulses are defined by a collection of samples of one or more waveforms.
  • 18. The system of claim 1, wherein the pulse generator circuit are operable to generate one or more digital signals.
  • 19. The system of claim 1, wherein the configuration is based on commands received via an application programming interface.
PRIORITY CLAIM

This application is a continuation of application Ser. No. 17/894,222 filed Aug. 24, 2022, which is a continuation of application Ser. No. 17/459,062 filed Aug. 27, 2021 (U.S. Pat. No. 11,463,075), which is a continuation of application Ser. No. 17/088,973 filed Nov. 4, 2020 (U.S. Pat. No. 11,115,011), which is a continuation of application Ser. No. 16/708,780 filed Dec. 10, 2019 (U.S. Pat. No. 10,862,465), which claims priority to U.S. provisional patent application 62/894,905 filed Sep. 2, 2019. The aforementioned documents are each hereby incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.

US Referenced Citations (91)
Number Name Date Kind
4875484 Anzai et al. Oct 1989 A
5063354 Lauper et al. Nov 1991 A
5194907 Hayashi Mar 1993 A
6223228 Ryan et al. Apr 2001 B1
6426984 Perino et al. Jul 2002 B1
6993108 Chi et al. Jan 2006 B1
7451292 Routt Nov 2008 B2
7535931 Zampetti et al. May 2009 B1
7627126 Pikalo Dec 2009 B1
8315969 Roetteler Nov 2012 B2
8385878 Rao Feb 2013 B2
8750717 Yap et al. Jun 2014 B1
9207672 Williams Dec 2015 B2
9400499 Williams Jul 2016 B2
9509324 McDonald et al. Nov 2016 B2
9663358 Cory et al. May 2017 B1
9692423 McDermott, III Jun 2017 B2
9847121 Frank Dec 2017 B2
9858531 Monroe Jan 2018 B1
9892365 Rigetti Feb 2018 B2
9978020 Gambetta May 2018 B1
9979400 Sete May 2018 B1
9996801 Shim Jun 2018 B2
10063228 Deurloo et al. Aug 2018 B2
10122351 Naaman Nov 2018 B1
10127499 Rigetti Nov 2018 B1
10192168 Rigetti Jan 2019 B2
10223643 Bishop et al. Mar 2019 B1
10333503 Cohen et al. Jun 2019 B1
10454459 Cohen Oct 2019 B1
10496069 Nazarathy et al. Dec 2019 B2
10505524 Cohen Dec 2019 B1
10560076 Cohen Feb 2020 B1
10637449 Cohen et al. Apr 2020 B1
10659018 Cohen May 2020 B1
10666238 Cohen May 2020 B1
10958253 Cohen et al. Mar 2021 B1
10985739 Cohen et al. Apr 2021 B2
11010145 Smith et al. May 2021 B1
11463075 Cohen et al. Oct 2022 B2
11616497 Cohen et al. Mar 2023 B2
11616498 Cohen et al. Mar 2023 B2
20020004876 Timmer et al. Jan 2002 A1
20040266084 Fujishima et al. Dec 2004 A1
20050015422 Kohn et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050180575 Maeda et al. Aug 2005 A1
20060093376 Mitchell et al. May 2006 A1
20080037693 Andrus et al. Feb 2008 A1
20100072979 Fefer et al. Mar 2010 A1
20110035511 Biederman Feb 2011 A1
20130198499 Dice et al. Aug 2013 A1
20160125311 Fuechsle et al. May 2016 A1
20160267032 Rigetti et al. Sep 2016 A1
20160292586 Rigetti et al. Oct 2016 A1
20170094618 Bjorkengren Mar 2017 A1
20170214410 Hincks et al. Jul 2017 A1
20170356938 Delplanque Dec 2017 A1
20170364796 Wiebe Dec 2017 A1
20180013426 Deurloo et al. Jan 2018 A1
20180032893 Epstein Feb 2018 A1
20180091244 Abdo Mar 2018 A1
20180107579 Chapman Apr 2018 A1
20180123597 Sete May 2018 A1
20180176008 Tsuyuzaki Jun 2018 A1
20180237039 Mong et al. Aug 2018 A1
20180260245 Smith Sep 2018 A1
20180260730 Reagor Sep 2018 A1
20180260732 Bloom Sep 2018 A1
20180308007 Amin Oct 2018 A1
20180322409 Barends Nov 2018 A1
20180365585 Smith Dec 2018 A1
20180373995 Tomaru et al. Dec 2018 A1
20180375650 Legre Dec 2018 A1
20190042964 Elsherbini et al. Feb 2019 A1
20190042965 Clarke Feb 2019 A1
20190042970 Zou Feb 2019 A1
20190042971 Zou Feb 2019 A1
20190042972 Zou Feb 2019 A1
20190042973 Zou Feb 2019 A1
20190049495 Ofek Feb 2019 A1
20190251478 Bishop et al. Aug 2019 A1
20190266512 Shen et al. Aug 2019 A1
20190302832 Morgan et al. Oct 2019 A1
20190317589 Mathur et al. Oct 2019 A1
20190385088 Naaman et al. Dec 2019 A1
20200293080 Poon et al. Sep 2020 A1
20200364602 Niu et al. Nov 2020 A1
20210004707 Gambetta et al. Jan 2021 A1
20210103847 Akzam Apr 2021 A1
20210125096 Puri et al. Apr 2021 A1
20210359670 Cohen et al. Nov 2021 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (26)
Number Date Country
2420022 Feb 2003 CA
104467843 Mar 2015 CN
105281886 Jan 2016 CN
105912070 Aug 2016 CN
108111306 Jun 2018 CN
108594214 Sep 2018 CN
110085094 Aug 2019 CN
110677210 Jan 2020 CN
111464154 Jul 2020 CN
111767055 Oct 2020 CN
112019193 Dec 2020 CN
112149832 Dec 2020 CN
0388052 Sep 1990 EP
2011175078 Sep 2011 JP
2012188875 Oct 2012 JP
2015178991 Nov 2015 WO
2015178992 Nov 2015 WO
2017078735 May 2017 WO
2017123940 Jul 2017 WO
2017139683 Aug 2017 WO
2018055607 Mar 2018 WO
2018062991 Apr 2018 WO
2019063117 Apr 2019 WO
2020033807 Feb 2020 WO
2020231795 Nov 2020 WO
2021123903 Jun 2021 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (57)
Entry
European Office Communication with extended Search Report Appln No. 20845965.1 dated Jun. 29, 2023.
European Office Communication with extended Search Report Appln No. 20861242.4 dated Jul. 7, 2023.
European Office Communication with extended Search Report Appln No. 23153085.8 dated Jul. 3, 2023.
Yang Yet al: “FPGA-based electronic system for the control and readout of superconducting qubit systems”, arxiv.org, Cornell University Library, 201 Yang Yet al: “FPGA-based electronic system for the control and readout of superconducting qubit systems”, arxiv.org, Cornell University Library, 201 Olin Library Cornell University Ithaca, NY 14853, Oct. 15, 2021 (Oct. 15, 2021), XP091078848.
Gebauer Richard et al: “A modular RFSoC-based approach to interface superconducting quantum bits”, 2021 International Conference on Field-Programmable Technology (ICFPT), IEEE, Dec. 6, 2021 (Dec. 6, 2021), pp. 1-9, XP034028257, DOI: 10.1109/ICFPT52863.2021.9609909 [retrieved on Nov. 8, 2021].
Lavoie et al., “A Formalization for Specifying and Implementing Correct Pull-Stream Modules,” in arXiv preprint arXiv: 1801.06144 (2018). (Year: 2018).
Fu et al., “A Microarchitecture for a Superconducting Quantum Processor,” in 38.3 I EEE Micro 40-47 (2018). (Year: 2018).
U.S. Appl. No. 62/294,966, filed Feb. 12, 2016.
Int'l Search Report and Written Opinion Appln No. PCT/IB2019/001410 dated Jun. 10, 2020.
Int'l Search Report and Written Opinion Appln No. PCT/IB2019/001394 dated Jun. 17, 2020.
Zhang J, Hegde SS, Suter D. Pulse sequences for controlled 2-and 3-qubit gates in a hybrid quantum register. arXiv preprint arXiv:1806.08408. Jun. 21, 2018.
Wang CY, Kuznetsova L, Gkortsas VM, Diehl L, Kaertner FX, Belkin MA, Belyanin A, Li X, Ham D, Schneider H, Grant P. Mode-locked pulses from mid-infrared quantum cascade lasers. Optics Express. Jul. 20, 2009;17(15):12929-43.
Int'l Search Report and Written Opinion Appln No. PCT/IB2020/000218 dated Aug. 11, 2020.
Quan R, Zhai Y, Wang M, Hou F, Wang S, Xiang X, Liu T, Zhang S, Dong R. Demonstration of quantum synchronization based on second-order quantum coherence of entangled photons. Scientific reports. Jul. 25, 2016;6:30453. Jul. 25, 2016 (Jul. 25, 2016).
Int'l Search Report and Written Opinion Appln No. PCT/IB2020/000376 dated Sep. 17, 2020.
Breitfelder et al. eds., IEEE 100: The Authoritative Dictionary of IEEE Standards Terms 1247, definition 2 of “variable” (7th ed. 2000). (Year: 2000).
Int'l Search Report and Written Opinion Appln No. PCT/IB2020/000707 dated Jan. 12, 2021.
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. “Quantum Computing: Progress and Prospects”. eprint (Dec. 2018) [online]. [retrieved on Jan. 7, 2020]. retrieved from: <https://doi.org/10.17226/25196.> Dec. 4, 2018 (Dec. 4, 2018) pp. 114, 142, 210, Fig. 2.5, Qiskit Backend Specifications at footnote 57: section 4.2, 5.1.5, Fig. 3, Fig. 4, pp. 30, 57.
IBM Research. “Qiskit Backend Specifications for OpenQASM and OpenPulse Experiments”. eprint arXiv:1809.03452v1 (Sep. 10, 2018) [online]. [retrieved on Jan. 7, 2020]. retrieved from: <https://arxiv.org/pdf/1809.03452.pdf> Sep. 10, 2018 (Sep. 10, 2018) section 4.2, 5.1.5, Fig. 3, Fig. 4 , pp. 30, 57.
Int'l Search Report and Written Opinion Appln No. PCT/IB2020/000704 dated Jan. 17, 2021.
Wolfowicz, et al. Pulse Techniques for Quantum Information Processing University of Chicago, University College London, eMagRes, 2016, vol. 5: 1515-1528. DOI 10.1002/9780470034590.emrstm1521.
Int'l Search Report and Written Opinion Appln No. PCT/IB2020/000555 dated Dec. 27, 2020.
Int'l Search Report and Written Opinion Appln No. PCT/IB2020/000760 dated Jan. 27, 2021.
“Quantum-classical interface based on single flux quantum digital logic”. In: Quantum Science and Technology 3.2 (2018), pp. 1-16. DOI: 10.1088/2058-9565/aaa3a0.(retrieved on Jan. 20, 2021). Retrieved from the Internet: < https://arxiv.org/pdf/1710.04645.pdf > McDermott R. et al. Oct. 12, 2017 (Oct. 12, 2017) Section VI, VII, VIII.
Roffe, J., Quantum Error Correction: An Introductory Guide, Dept. of Physics & Astronomy, Univ. of Sheffeld, UK, Oct. 10, 2019, pp. 1-29.
Int'l Search Report and Written Opinion Appln No. PCT/IB2020/001004 dated May 13, 2021.
Int'l Preliminary Report on Patentability Appln No. PCT/IB2019/001410 dated Jun. 10, 2021.
Int'l Search Report and Written Opinion Appln No. PCT/IB2021/000067 dated Jun. 21, 2021.
Int'l Preliminary Report on Patentability Appln No. PCT/IB2019/001394 dated Jul. 29, 2021.
Int'l Preliminary Report on Patentability Appln No. PCT/IB2020/000218 dated Sep. 16, 2021.
Int'l Preliminary Report on Patentability Appln No. PCT/IB2020/000376 dated Nov. 12, 2021.
Int'l Search Report and Written Opinion Appln No. PCT/IB2021/056254 dated Dec. 1, 2021.
Ribeiro, Diogo C., Pedro M. Cruz, and Nuno Borges Carvalho, “Towards a denser frequency grid in phase measurements using mixer-based receivers.” 2015 85th Microwave Measurement Conference (ARFTG). IEEE, 2015. Dec. 31, 2015 (Dec. 31, 2015).
Int'l Preliminary Report on Patentability Appln No. PCT/IB2020/000555 dated Feb. 10, 2022.
Int'l Preliminary Report on Patentability Appln No. PCT/IB2020/000707 dated Mar. 17, 2022.
Int'l Preliminary Report on Patentability Appln No. PCT/IB2020/000704 dated Mar. 17, 2022.
Int'l Preliminary Report on Patentability Appln No. PCT/IB2020/000760 dated Apr. 7, 2022.
Int'l Search Report and Written Opinion Appln No. PCT/IB2022/050190 dated Apr. 11, 2022.
Int'l Search Report and Written Opinion Appln No. PCT/IB2022/000059 dated Jul. 7, 2022.
Moreira , “QuTech Central Controller: A Quantum Control Architecture for a Surface-17 Logical Qubit.” Delft University of Technology Student Theses Collection (2019). Available at the following URL: http://resolver.tudelft.nl/uuid:502ed5e5-87f7-42bd-a077-c24b7281cd94 May 10, 2019 (May 10, 2019).
Int'l Preliminary Report on Patentability Appln No. PCT/IB2020/001004 dated Jun. 30, 2022.
Int'l Search Report and Written Opinion Appln No. PCT/IB2022/000024 dated Jul. 18, 2022.
Baier, Simon, Matteo Pompili, Sophie LN Hermans, Hans KC Beukers, Peter C. Humphreys, Raymond N. Schouten, Raymond FL Vermeulen et al. “Realization of a Multi-Node Quantum Network of Remote Solid-State Qubits”, Science, vol. 372, pp. 259-264 (2021) Baier Simon Apr. 16, 2021 (Apr. 16, 2021).
Int'l Search Report and Written Opinion Appln No. PCT/IB2022/000068 dated Jul. 17, 2022.
D. Copsey et al., “Toward a scalable, silicon-based quantum computing architecture,” in IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Quantum Electronics, vol. 9, No. 6, pp. 1552-1569, Nov.-Dec. 2003, doi: 10.1109/JSTQE.2003.820922. Dec. 31, 2003 (Dec. 31, 2003).
Extended European Search Report Appln No. 19889443.8 dated Aug. 4, 2022.
Int'l Search Report and Written Opinion Appln No. PCT/IB2022/054903 dated Sep. 8, 2022.
Int'l Preliminary Report on Patentability Appln No. PCT/IB2021/000067 dated Sep. 22, 2022.
Int'l Search Report and Written Opinion Appln No. PCT/IB2022/053304 dated Oct. 6, 2022.
Serrano, Javier, M. Lipinski, T. Wlostowski, E. Gousiou, Erik van der Bij, M. Cattin, and G. Daniluk. “The white rabbit project.” (2013) Sep. 19, 2013 (Sep. 19, 2013) Entire document.
Extended European Search Report Appln No. 19910800.2 dated Oct. 6, 2022.
Hornibrook J Met al: “Cryogenic Control Architecture for Large-Scale Quantum Computing”, arxiv.org, Cornell University Library, 201 Olin Library Cornell University Ithaca, NY 14853, Sep. 8, 2014 (Sep. 8, 2014), XP081391509.
Fu X et al: “An Experimental Microarchitecture for a Superconducting Quantum Processor”, MICRO-50 '17: Proceedings of the 50th Annual IEEE/ACM International Symposium on Microarchitecture, Cornell University Library, 201 Olin Library Cornell University Ithaca, NY 14853, Oct. 14, 2017 (Oct. 14, 2017), pp. 1-13, XP081291220.
Zopes J. et al: “High resolution quantum sensing with shaped control pulses”, arxiv.org, Cornell University Library, 201 Olin Library Cornell University Ithaca, NY 14853, May 22, 2017 (May 22, 2017), XP081276850.
Cross et al. “Open Quantum Assembly Language”, Jan. 10, 2017.
European Office Communication with extended Search Report Appln No. 20766036.6 dated Nov. 24, 2022.
Japanese Patent Office Action Appln No. 2021-529723 dated Oct. 26, 2022 with translation.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20230318586 A1 Oct 2023 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
62894905 Sep 2019 US
Continuations (4)
Number Date Country
Parent 17894222 Aug 2022 US
Child 18307225 US
Parent 17459062 Aug 2021 US
Child 17894222 US
Parent 17088973 Nov 2020 US
Child 17459062 US
Parent 16708780 Dec 2019 US
Child 17088973 US