The present application claims priority from Australian Provisional Patent Application No 2012903473 filed on 13 Aug. 2012, the content of which is incorporated herein by reference.
This disclosure concerns quantum logic, in particular a device for performing quantum logic, a method for performing quantum logic and for controlling the exchange interaction between electron spins of a pair of donor electrons.
A scalable quantum computer could be constructed where quantum information is encoded in the spin of electrons bound to donor atoms in silicon, as described in Ref.
Definition of the Qubit
A qubit is defined as the quantum state of the spin of an electron bound to an electrically active donor atom that is incorporated into crystalline silicon (Si). An example of a donor atom is phosphorus (P). Other suitable donor atoms include As, Sb, Bi. The deliberate placement of an individual donor atom in Si nanostructures has been demonstrated both by single-ion implantation, as described in Ref. [2] and by scanning probe lithography, as described in Ref. [3].
Readout of a Single Electron Spin
Spin qubit readout will now be discussed with reference to
The physical mechanism through which the electron leaves the donor atom and enters the charge reservoir is quantum mechanical tunnelling, which occurs on a characteristic time scale τt. This time scale is of crucial importance. Typical useful values of τt range from 1 μs to 100 ms. The spin state of the electron is detected by placing a charge sensor in the proximity of the donor atom. A charge sensor is a nanostructure that allows the passage of electrical current, in an amount which is very strongly dependent on the electrostatic environment. A well-designed charge sensor is able to detect, in real time, the displacement of a single electron charge in its vicinity, to within distances of order 10-100 nm. Examples of charge sensors include Quantum Point Contacts (QPCs), as described in Ref. [6], Single-Electron Transistors (SETs) 102, as described in Ref. [7], and even ordinary transistors operated at low enough temperature, see Ref. [8].
In a spin readout structure based on spin-dependent tunnelling, the state of the electron spin is assigned as |↑ if the charge sensor detects the displacement of the electron charge, or |↓) otherwise (compare spin-dependent current trace in
Encoding an Arbitrary State on the Qubit
With reference to
In addition to the electron spin, donor atoms also possess a nuclear spin, which is magnetically coupled to the electron through the hyperfine interaction A. Different donor atoms have different nuclear spin values, e.g. ½ for P, 3/2 for As, 5/2 or 7/2 for Sb, and 9/2 for Bi. P is the simplest, since it can be described in the simple basis of nuclear spin up | or down | states, but the discussion below is applicable to all donors. The nuclear spin can also be read out and controlled with very high fidelity, as recently demonstrated for a P nucleus by Ref. [11]. All together, the current state of the art allows initializing and controlling the spin state of both the electron and the nuclear spin of single donor atoms in silicon.
Quantum Logic Operations
The next fundamental step for the construction of a functional and scalable quantum computer is the realization of quantum logic gates between pairs of qubits. A universal quantum computer can be built on the basis of single-qubit rotations (already demonstrated, see above), together with two-qubit gates such as the CNOT gate described by Ref. [12], where a qubit is rotated or not, depending on the state of the other. It has been shown that a CNOT gate can be obtained from a combination of single-qubit rotations together with the √{square root over (SWAP)} gate described by Ref. [13]. Physically, the √{square root over (SWAP)} gate can be implemented naturally with qubits based on electron spins, by introducing a magnetic interaction between the spins, called “exchange interaction”, with strength indicated by J. Two electron spins coupled by exchange interaction and prepared initially e.g. in the state |↓↑), will evolve in time towards the state |↑↓ and back (this is known as “exchange oscillations”), with a period τJ=h/j where h=6.64·10−34 J·s is the Planck constant. The typical period of the exchange oscillation between donors at a distance of order 20 nm is τJ≈0.1-1 ns. The evolution from |↓ to |↑↓ is a full SWAP gate, whereas the √{square root over (SWAP)} is obtained by stopping halfway, i.e. interrupting the exchange oscillations after an evolution time τ√{square root over (SWAP)}=h/4j.
An early proposal for donor-spin-based quantum computer in silicon as described by Ref. [14] suggested the use and control of the exchange interaction as the physical resource for two-qubit gates. It was proposed there that the value of J can be tuned by applying a voltage to an electrostatic gate placed laterally between the two donor atoms. The physical mechanism for this relies upon modifying the electron wavefunctions, and therefore their overlap, on which the value of J depends. Subsequent theoretical work further investigated the dependence off on the distance between the donors 301 and 302, and on the voltage on a gate 303 placed between them, described by Ref. [15]. A sketch of the envisaged device structure is shown in
A difficulty with achieving control of the exchange interaction between donors and the observation of exchange oscillations arises for the structure shown in
With reference to
Disclosure
There is provided a method for controlling exchange oscillations between a pair of electron spin states in a quantum computation device comprising a pair of donor atoms incorporated in crystalline silicon, wherein each donor atom has a nucleus and at least one bound electron. Quantum information is encoded in a spin state of the nucleus and/or the bound electron of the donor atoms, and the spin state of the nucleus of each donor atom is coupled to the spin state of its respective bound electron via the hyperfine interaction (A), an exchange interaction (J) between the spin state of each of the two electrons results in exchange oscillations between them, and wherein the nuclear spins of the donor atoms are prepared in opposite states. The exchange interaction (J) is tuned by the application of a switchable voltage to selectively change the relative strength of the exchange interaction with respect to the hyperfine interaction and, thereby selectively controlling the exchange oscillations between the two bound electrons.
Tuning the exchange interaction (J) between the donor electron spins may be achieved by modifying the relative potential of the two donor atoms. Alternatively, the step of controlling the exchange interaction (J) between the donor electron spins may be achieved by modifying the potential barrier between the two donor atoms.
The amplitude of the exchange oscillations between the two bound electrons may be made larger or smaller, depending on the tuning of the exchange interaction (J) with respect to the hyperfine interaction (A). The exchange between the two bound electrons may, therefore, be turned on or suppressed. This is in contrast to reducing the frequency of exchange oscillations such that the state does not change within the readout timescale τt.
The method for controlling (switching) the effect of the exchange interaction (J) between donor electron spins, may enable to perform a quantum logic operation between two electron spins by tuning the exchange interaction (J) relative to the hyperfine interaction (A), and preparing the nuclear spins in opposite states, such that the exchange operation takes place while J>>A, whereas exchange is stopped to allow the readout of the results while J<<A.
The method may be performed in the context of two qubit exchange gate operations. For instance for performing SWAP operations between the electron spins of two donors in silicon, or for performing √{square root over (SWAP)} operations between the electron spins of two donors in silicon.
The method may comprise the steps of:
Wherein, the exchange operation is controlled by the application of a switchable voltage to selectively modify the relative energy of the two bound electrons or modify the potential barrier in between them.
An electron reservoir may be provided to facilitate initialisation. An electrometer may be provided to determine a charge state of a donor atom. A single electron Transistor (SET) may be provided for readout. The Single Electron Transistor (SET) may be tunnel-coupled to the donor atoms. Upon application of a magnetic field read-out may involve spin dependent quantum mechanical tunnelling of a donor electron in the higher energy spin state to a charge reservoir.
The method may comprise the step of detuning to protect against unwanted exchange oscillations during a two qubit exchange operations.
There is provided a quantum computing device for controlling exchange oscillations between a pair of electron spin states in a quantum computation device. The device comprising a pair of donor atoms incorporated in crystalline silicon, wherein each donor atom has a nucleus and at least one bound electron. Quantum information is encoded in a spin state of the nucleus and/or the bound electron of the donor atoms, and the spin state of the nucleus of each donor atom is coupled to the spin state of its respective bound electron via the hyperfine interaction (A). An exchange interaction (J) between the spin states of the two electrons results in exchange oscillations between them; and tuning the exchange interaction (J) may involve the application of a switchable voltage which selectively changes the relative strength of the exchange interaction with respect to the hyperfine interaction. As a result there may be selective control of the exchange oscillations between the two bound electrons when the nuclear spins are prepared in opposite spin states.
There is also provided a large scale quantum device comprising plural such devices fabricated on a common silicon wafer.
The invention is a method to switch on and off the exchange oscillations between electron spins bound to donor atoms, with only a modest requirement on the tunability of the exchange interaction J (2 orders of magnitude are sufficient), by exploiting the hyperfine coupling A between the electrons and the donor nuclei, and the ability to prepare the nuclear spins in any desired state.
Taking as example the P donor, the hyperfine interaction has strength (in frequency units) A=117 MHz. The invention relies upon two things:
If the nuclear spins are initially prepared in opposite states, e.g. |, a value of J≈1 GHz>>A is sufficient to allow free exchange oscillations with period of order 1 ns. Switching J to ≈10 MHz<<A has the effect of freezing out the exchange oscillations for a long enough time so that a spin readout device placed in the vicinity of the qubit can observe the spin state created by the two-qubit gate, without deterioration of the spin state during the wait time.
Tuning J by 2 orders of magnitude can be achieved by using two gates 501, 502 on each side of the donor pair 301, 302 instead of a gate 303 placed precisely between the donors. These two gates can be tuned to produce an electric field along the axis that joins the donors in the pair. The physical mechanism by which J can be tuned is not directly a modification of the wavefunction overlap, but a modification of the relative energy (known as “detuning”, ∈ 503) of the two donor electrons, which also enters in the value of J. Some calculations of J versus ∈ have been performed in the case of quantum dots in silicon [16], and show that the tunability range is expected to be sufficient.
The prior art has been described above with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:
Examples of the invention will now be described with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:
Referring first to
The electrochemical potential of the donors is controlled by the voltage VD1 on the electrostatic gate 501 (for the left donor 301) and VD2 on gate 502 (for the right donor 302). If VD1≠VD2 an electric field E∈ exists between the donors. This leads to a detuning ∈ 503 between the electrochemical potentials of the two donors. As shown in
A broadband microwave transmission line 507 can be used to deliver microwave—for electron spin resonance (ESR)—and radio-frequency—for nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR)—pulses of oscillating magnetic field 508. Other structures, such as resonant cavities and NMR coils, can be employed for the same purpose.
Time Evolution of the Electron Spin States
Referring now to
It is convenient to use the well-known nomenclature for the two-donor electron spin states, where we call:
1/√{square root over (2)}(|↓↑−|↑↓)=|S “singlet state”
|↓↓=|T−
1/√{square root over (2)}(|↓↑+|↑↓)=|T0 “triplet states”
|↑↑=|T
Considering now the case where only combinations of the |↓↑ and |↑↓ states are relevant, we can depict the time evolution of the coupled donor electron spins on a single “Bloch sphere” where the state |S is at the North pole, the state |T0 is at the South pole and the states |↓↑ and |↑↓ are on the equator.
In this representation, the difference in hyperfine field ΔBA between the two donors can be depicted as a fictitious magnetic field along the x-axis, while the exchange field BJ acts as a fictitious magnetic field along the z-axis. The two-electron spin state therefore evolves by a precession around the vector sum of the two fields arising from the combined action of ΔBA and BJ. This type of representation, and the corresponding time evolution, have been discussed and demonstrated in previous work described by Ref. [17]. There, however, the hyperfine field arises from the presence of a large number (of order 106) of nuclear spins coupled to the electron, confined in a quantum dot. Such hyperfine field can be treated classically from a mathematical point of view, and cannot be controlled on short time scales, from an experimental point of view. The present device makes use of the fact that the nuclear spin of a donor atom is a quantum object, and can be controlled quickly and reliably with NMR techniques see
Considering first the case when the nuclear spins are in the same state, i.e. | or |, as in
If instead the nuclear spins are prepared in opposite states, i.e. | or |, then ΔBA≠0. The evolution of the electron spins will depend on the relative magnitude of A and J. For J>>A (
Pulse Sequence to Control and Observe Exchange Oscillations
Referring now to
The protocol can be broken down into four main parts:
Below we describe each phase involved in the protocol, referring to the sketches in
i. Read and Initialization of the Nuclear Spins
ii. Initialization of the Electron Spins
iii. Exchange Operation between the Electrons
iv. Readout of the Final Electronic Spin States
Integration of the Two-Qubit Logic Gate with a Larger Quantum Computer Architecture
A scalable and fault-tolerant architecture for a quantum computer based on donor electron spins has been proposed by Ref. [1]. It comprises all the components discussed above, such as: Donor electron spins; Spin readout devices; Microwave pulses to control the spin state; Two-qubit logic gates based on the exchange interaction; In addition, it proposes the use of rails of ionized donors along which the electrons can be moved from one interaction zone to the other, or to the spin readout device.
The device and method disclosed here can be integrated with the architecture published in Ref. [1] with no difficulty. The only requirement is that, every time one wishes to read out the state of an electron spin, the electron needs to be transported to the nearest spin readout device, by moving it along a rail of ionized donors. Therefore, all the steps for the preparation and demonstration of a two-qubit gate using the invention can be used as described, with the only addition of extra electron transport steps.
In a scaled-up quantum computer architecture, it is not always necessary to initialize the electron spins to the |↓↑ state as in
The following references are incorporated herein by reference:
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2012903473 | Aug 2012 | AU | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/AU2013/000886 | 8/12/2013 | WO | 00 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2014/026222 | 2/20/2014 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
6472681 | Kane | Oct 2002 | B1 |
20050117836 | Franson | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20130087766 | Schenkel | Apr 2013 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2009100483 | Aug 2009 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Kane, Bruce E. “A silicon-based nuclear spin quantum computer.” nature 393.6681 (1998): 133-137. |
Kane, Bruce E. “Silicon-based quantum computation.” arXiv preprint quant-ph/0003031 (2000). |
Klauser, D., W. A. Coish, and Daniel Loss. “Quantum-dot spin qubit and hyperfine interaction.” Advances in Solid State Physics. Springer, Berlin, (Year: 2008). |
Ng et al. “Introduction to Solid-State Quantum Computation for Engineers” Microelectronics Journal 33, pp. 171-177 (2002). |
Kane B.E. “A Silicon-based Nuclear Spin Quantum Computer” Semiconductor Nanofabrication Facility, School of Physics, University of New South Wales, Australia. |
Kane B.E. “Silicon-based Quantum Computation” Laboratory for Physical Sciences, University of Maryland (2008). |
Fang et al. “Simulation of Si:P Spin-based Quantum Computer Architecture” Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign (2008). |
Kane B.E. et al. “Single Spin Measurement Using Single-electron Transistors to Probe Two-electron Systems” Physical Review B, vol. 61, (2000). |
Hollenberg et al. “Two-dimensional Architectures for Donor-Based Quantum Computing” Physical Review B, vol. 74, (2006). |
Jamieson et al. “Controlled Shallow Single-ion Implantation in Silicon Using an Active Substrate for Sub-20-keV ions” Applied Physics Letters 86, 202101 (2005). |
Fuechsle et al. “A Single-atom Transistor” Nature Nanotechnology 7, pp. 242-246 (2012). |
Morello et al. “Single-Shot Readout of an Electron Spin in Silicon” arXiv:1003.2679 [cond-mat.mes-hall], (2010). |
Elzerman et al. Single-shot read-out of an Individual Electron Spin in a Quantum Dot Letters to Nature, Vol. 430, pp. 431-435 (2004). |
Vandersypen et al. “Real-Time Detection of Single-Electon Tunneling Using a Quantum Point Contact” Applied Physics Letters vol. 85, No. 19, pp. 4394-4396 (2004). |
Angus et al. “A Silicon Radio-Frequency Single Electron Transistor at 4.2K” Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence for Quantum Computer Technology, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia. |
Xiao et al. “Electrical Detection of the Spin Resonance of a Single Electron in a Silicon Field-effect Transistor” Letters to nature, vol. 430, pp. 435-439 (2004). |
Morello et al. “Architecture for High-Sensitivity Single-Shot Readout and Control of the Electron Spin of Individual Donors in Silicon” arXiv:0904.1271v4 [cond-mat.mes-hall], (2009). |
Pla et al. “A Single-Atom Electron Spin Quibit in Silicon” arXiv:1305.4481 [cond-mat.mes-hall], (2013). |
Pla et al. “High-Fidelity Readout and Control of a Nuclear Spin Quibit in Silicon” Nature vol. 496, pp. 334-338 (2013). |
Barenco et al. “Elementary Gates for Quantum Computation” Physical Review A (AC5710), pp. 1-31 (1995). |
Loss et al. “Quantum Computation With Quantum Dots” Physical Review A vol. 57, No. 1, pp. 120-126 (1998). |
Wellard et al. “Electron Exchange Coupling for Single-Donor Solid-state Spin Qubits” Physical Review B vol. 68, pp. 1-9 (2003). |
Nielsen et al. “A Configuration Interaction Analysis of Exchange in Double Quantum Dots” Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, New Mexico, pp. 1-15 (2013). |
Petta et al. “Coherent Manipulation of Coupled Electron Spins in Semiconductor Quantum Dots” downloaded from Sciencemag.org, vol. 309, pp. 2180-2184 (2005). |
Van Der Wiel et al. “Electron Transport Through Double Quantum Dots” Reviews of Modern Physics, vol. 75, (2003). |
Skinner et al. “Hydrogenic Spin Quantum Computing in Silicon: a Digital Approach” (Jun. 21, 2002). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20150206061 A1 | Jul 2015 | US |