The invention relates to a modulation/demodulation method for multi-amplitude digital modulated signals with non-equidistant phases transmitted via an orthogonal frequency division multiplexing (OFDM) communication channel and also refers to an OFDM system for the transmission of information by multi-amplitude digital modulated signals from a transmitter to a receiver via a radio channel.
Orthogonal frequency division multiplexing (OFDM) has gained increasing interest in wireless communication systems during the last years, in particular for DAB (Digital Audio Broadcast) and DVB-T (Digital Video Broadcast Television). It has been considered for transmitting high data rate over frequency selective radio channels.
The principle of OFDM transmission technique is to devise an available bandwidth into several subchannels with smaller bandwidths. Thus the symbol length increases and the inter symbol interference (ISI) is combated. On the other hand, each subchannel is considered to be frequency non-selective. The amplitude and phase distortion caused by multipath effects is accordingly described by one factor.
In coherent transmission systems that distortion is removed by channel estimation. For this purpose known symbols are sent on pilot subcarrier(s). On the receiver side the amount of channel distortion is processed from the received known symbols and is used to correct the rest of the data before demodulation.
Channel estimation is not required, if differental modulation is used. The information is encoded in the ratio of successive symbols on the same subcarrier. Thus, the channel distortion is cancelled at the receiver, since it is assumed to be constant during successive OFDM symbols.
However, differential modulation and demodulation have been only described for low-order single-amplitude modulation schemes, such as PSK (Phase-Shift Keying) and QPSK (Quadrature Phase-Shift Keying). As for a specific example, reference is made to document DE 195 40 250 C1 describing a demodulation scheme based on the assumption that the demodulated complex symbols are associated to respectively transmitted symbols via a rotational symmetric constellation diagram so that approximative estimations for the phase-shift lead to applications with reasonable results.
For multi-amplitude signals such as QAM (Quadrature Amplitude Modulation) only coherent modulation is used, and thus channel estimation is always required (see e.g. EP 0 734 132 A2).
It is an object of the present invention to teach a more simple modulation/demodulation method and system for multi-amplitude digital modulated signals with non-equidistant phases, in particular QAM signals transmitted via an OFDM communication channel without the necessity of using pilot carriers.
According to the teaching and the characterizing features of claim 1, this problem is solved with the idea that the amplitudes of said digital modulated signals should be separately and coherently processed, whereas for the phases of respectively subsequent symbols on the same subcarrier differential modulation and demodulation is provided.
Advantageous details, improvements and embodiments are the subject of dependent claims.
An orthogonal frequency division multiplexing (OFDM) system for the transmission of information by multi-amplitude digital modulated signals from a transmitter to a receiver via a radio channel in accordance with the invention is the subject-matter of and defined in claim 9. Specific embodiments and advantageous supplements and improvements are defined in further dependent claims.
For a comprehensive explanation of the invention the following description is devided in chapters.
In Chapter I the OFDM transmission model used for simulations and the channel models are first described.
In Chapter II the simulation of coherent modulated 16 QAM is presented.
In Chapter III the principle of the combined coherent/differential (henceforward called quasi-differential) modulation for 16 QAM signals is described as well as the way it was implemented according to a best mode presently known.
In Chapter IV the simulation results of both techniques are compared in terms of BER (Bit Error Rate) performance in an AWGN (Additive White Gaussian Noise) channel and in a multipath channel.
Finally as a Summary a brief comparison of both systems with respect to implementation complexity will conclude the present description of the invention.
In the following description reference will be made to the accompanying drawings in which
Chapter I: System Simulations
In order to evaluate both the coherent transmission scheme and the quasi-differential transmission scheme according to the invention in different environments a baseband simulation tool known under the tradename COSSAP has been used.
The OFDM transmission model used for such simulations is shown in
The blocks of
Two channel models have been considered for simulation: An additive white Gaussian noise channel (AWGN) and a frequency selective channel model proposed by ETSI (European Telecommunications Standards Institution) for the Universal Mobile Telecommunication System (UMTS). The latter is a Wide Sense Stationary Uncorrelated Scattering (WSSUS) channel model, that assumes that the received signal is represented by the sum of six delayed replicas of the input signal, weighted by independent zero-mean complex Gaussian time variant processes. The relative path loss and delay of each path for typical indoor environment is given in the Table 1 below:
On the receiver side the guard interval is first removed by windowing. The synchronization is not considered here. After the signal has been transformed into the frequency domain by FFT, the virtual carriers are extracted and the QAM demodulation is performed.
For the analysis the following system parameters have been used:
Chapter II: Coherent Modulation
As mentioned above, in the case of coherent modulation pilot symbols should be inserted to help channel estimation in the receiver. Normally, each frame contains a number of pilot symbols on different subcarriers. In the receiver the amount of distortion of the pilot subcarriers is interpolated in the time and frequency domains, in order to estimate the channel response over the frequency band of interest.
To simplify simulations it was assumed that one OFDM symbol with all sub-carriers set to a known value (I=1, Q=0) is sent at the beginning of each frame. On the receiver side that OFDM symbol is first filtered using a complex FIR filter, in order to shorten the effect of additive white Gaussian noise. It is then used as a measure of channel distortion and the following data symbols are correlated by equivalent factors. The simulation results over AWGN and UMTS channels are shown in
Curve “a” shows an ideal demodulation condition for AWGN. Curve “b” visualizes the coherent demodulation of 16 QAM signals over an AWGN channel causing a SNR degration of about 1 dB at a BER of 10 E-3. This is due to the fact that the channel estimation factor for every subcarrier is gained from a noisy pilot symbol in spite of FIR filtering. Further SNR degration of about 2,5 dB is observed, when a multipath channel UMTS is assumed (curve “c”).
These results can be improved by averaging the channel estimation factors over several frames, thus the effect of additive white Gaussian noise can be further shortened.
Chapter III: Quasi-Differential Modulation According to the Invention
The reason why quadrature amplitude modulated (QAM) signals can not be differentially processed as with DQPSK is the multi-ampliude constellation of QAM signals. The result would be endless many amplitude levels after a few symbols have been differentially modulated. This is, however, an undesired property that complicates the implementation.
Thus the idea of the invention is the separate handling of amplitude and phase of QAM signals. If only the phase of 16 QAM symbols are differentially modulated while keeping their original amplitudes, there would be endless many phase levels at three amplitudes (see
As shown in
The phase rotation on every subcarrier is no more relevant. Preferably and in accordance with the invention the amplitude distortion of the QAM signal due to frequency selectivity of the channel is separately corrected. The information about the correcting factor for every subcarrier is preferably taken from the QAM symbols whose phase is unique to them. This is the case for all symbols not located at the diagonals of the Q/I diagram. In particular, this is the case for 8 of the 16 symbols as shown in the constellation digram of
The correcting factors for the amplitude can be easier computed when a combined QPSK/16 QAM system is adopted. Often, wireless broadband systems adopt QPSK modulation of control data, for better robustness in frequency selective channels, and 16 QAM or higher modulation for useful data. In the system used for simulation, the frame structure of
Since QPSK symbols have definitely the amplitude “1”, and the channel is supposed to be static during one frame, the amount of amplitude distortion of the QPSK signal can be easily determined and used for correction of the QAM signal.
Furthermore, a running mean of the amplitude correcting factor can be performed during the QPSK transmission, in order to shorten the effect of additive white Gaussian noise.
If only 16 QAM signals are available, a running mean of the correcting factors can also be performed over a time window, where the channel is supposed to be static.
Quasi-differential demodulation in an AWGN channel causes a SNR degration of about 5.5 dB at a BER of 10 E-3; see
Chapter IV: Comparison of BER Performance
The BER results of both techniques are depicted in
However, the execellent performance of the 16 QAM quasi-differential modulation technique according to the invention becomes obvious when considering the multipath channel situation shown in
Chapter V: Summary
A novel incoherent demodulation technique for QAM signals has been presented. The BER performance of this technique has been analyzed and compared to the coherent one.
It can be concluded that the advantage of the coherent demodulation is the SNR gain of maximum 2 dB at a BER of 10 E-3. However, this can be further minimized when the additional overhead for channel estimation is used for higher coding of the quasi-differential modulated signal.
Furthermore, when considering the implementation aspects of both techniques compared here, it should be noticed that the differential technique according to the invention is less complex since the frequency synchronization of differential demoluted signals is easier. In particular, complex equalizers to perform channel estimation are no more needed as for coherent systems. Also, no pilot subcarriers are needed and thus the bandwidth efficiency is much higher.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
99100737 | Jan 1999 | EP | regional |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4683578 | Betts et al. | Jul 1987 | A |
5771224 | Seki et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
20030039322 | Murakami et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
195 40 250 | Feb 1997 | DE |
0 729 250 | Aug 1996 | EP |
0 734 132 | Sep 1996 | EP |
0 869 649 | Oct 1998 | EP |