The present disclosure relates to optical fibers, and in particular relates to a quasi-single-mode optical fiber with a large effective area.
The entire disclosure of any publication or patent document mentioned herein is incorporated by reference, including the publication by I. Roudas, et al., “Comparison of analytical models for the nonlinear noise in dispersive coherent optical communications systems,” IEEE Photonics Conference, paper MG3.4, Bellevue, Wash., September 2013; the publication by Sui et al., “256 Gb/s PM-16-QAM Quasi-Single-Mode Transmission over 2600 km using Few-Mode Fiber with Multi-Path Interference Compensation,” OFC Conference, San Francisco, Calif., Mar. 9-13, 2014, Fiber Non-linearity Mitigation and Compensation (M3C) (ISBN: 978-1-55752-993-0); and the publication by S. J. Savory, “Digital filters for coherent optical receivers,” Optics Express, Vol. 16, No. 2, Jan. 21, 2008, pp. 804-818.
Optical fibers are used for a variety of applications, especially in long-haul, high-speed optical communications systems. Optical fibers have an optical waveguide structure that acts to confine light to within a central region of the fiber. One of the many benefits of optical fibers is their ability to carry a large number of optical signals in different channels, which provides for high data transmission rates and a large bandwidth.
The increasing demand for bandwidth and higher data transmission rates has resulted in optical fibers carrying more channels and higher amounts of optical power. At some point, however, the optical power carried by the optical fiber can give rise to non-linear effects that distort the optical signals and reduce the transmission capacity of the optical communications system. Consequently, there is a practical limit to how much optical power an optical fiber can carry.
Because the optical power is confined by the waveguide structure of the optical fiber, the intensity determines the severity of non-linear effects in the optical fiber. The intensity is defined as the amount of optical power in the guided light divided by the (cross-sectional) area over which the guided light is distributed. This area is referred to in the art as the “effective area” Aeff of the optical fiber. The effective area Aeff is calculated from the electromagnetic field distribution of the light traveling within the optical fiber using techniques and methods known in the art.
It is well-known that optical fibers with large effective areas Aeff are desirable in optical transmission systems because of their relatively high power threshold for nonlinear distortion impairments. The larger the effective area Aeff, the lower the intensity and thus the less non-linear effects. Because of this feature, an optical fiber with a large effective area Aeff may be operated at higher optical powers, thereby increasing the optical signal-to-noise ratio (OSNR).
Unfortunately, the effective area Aeff of optical fibers cannot simply be increased without bound. The conventional wisdom in the art is that an effective area Aeff of about 150 μm2 is the limit for a true single-mode fiber to maintain sufficient bend robustness, (i.e., reduced loss due to bending). In some cases, an effective area Aeff of 150 μm2 may in fact already be too large for some bending-loss requirements. However, the bending loss of an optical fiber can be reduced by increasing the mode confinement and hence the cutoff wavelength of the optical fiber associated with single-mode operation. Increasing the effective area Aeff beyond present-day values would require raising the cutoff wavelength to be above the signal wavelength, thereby resulting in few-mode operation, which gives rise to undesirable optical transmission impairments such as modal dispersion and multipath interference (MPI).
Alternatives to increasing the effective area Aeff of the optical fiber to reduce adverse non-linear effects include decreasing the effective nonlinear index n2. The nonlinear physics of an optical fiber depends on the ratio n2/Aeff. However, changing n2 is difficult and the resulting effect is likely to be very small. Reducing the fiber attenuation is another alternative for better transmission performance. A lower fiber attenuation reduces the need for amplification and thus reduces the noise of the transmission link, which in turn reduces the required signal power for a given required OSNR. However, reducing the attenuation of the optical fiber impacts the optical fiber transmission system in a different way than by changing the effective area Aeff, so that these two parameters cannot be exactly traded off.
What is needed therefore is a more robust type of large-effective-area optical fiber that reduces adverse non-linear effects while also having sufficiently small bending loss.
An aspect of the disclosure is a QSM optical fiber. The QSM fiber includes a core having a centerline and an outer edge, with a peak refractive index n0 on the centerline and a refractive index n1 at the outer edge. A cladding section surrounds the core and has a first inner annular cladding region immediately adjacent the core. The core and cladding section support a fundamental mode LP01 and a higher-order mode LP11 and define: i) for the fundamental mode LP01: an effective area Aeff>170 μm2 and an attenuation of no greater than 0.17 dB/km at 1530 nm; ii) for the higher-order mode LP11: an attenuation of at least 1.0 dB/km at 1530 nm; and iii) a bending loss of BL<0.02 dB/turn at 1625 nm and for a bend diameter DB=60 mm.
In one example of the QSM fiber described above, the effective area Aeff>200 μm2 at 1530 nm.
Another aspect of the disclosure is a QSM optical fiber that has a core having a centerline and a radius r1 greater than 5 μm, with a peak refractive index n0 on the centerline and a refractive index n1 at the radius r1; a cladding section surrounding the core, wherein the cladding section includes a first inner annular cladding region immediately adjacent the core with a minimum refractive index n2, a second inner annular cladding region immediately adjacent the first inner annular cladding region and having minimum refractive index n3, and a ring immediately adjacent the second inner annular cladding region and having a refractive index nR, wherein n0>n1>n3>n2 and nR>n3>n2; wherein the core and cladding section support a fundamental mode LP01 and a higher-order mode LP11 and define: i) for the fundamental mode LP01: an effective area Aeff>150 μm2 and an attenuation of no greater than 0.17 dB/km at 1530 nm; ii) for the higher-order mode LP11: an attenuation of at least 1.0 dB/km at 1530 nm; and iii) a bending loss of BL<0.02 dB/turn at 1625 nm and for a bend diameter DB=60 mm.
In one example of the QSM fiber described immediately above, the effective area Aeff>170 μm2, while in another example, the effective area Aeff>200 μm2. In another example, n1>nR, while in other examples n1=nR and n1<nR.
Another aspect of the disclosure is an optical transmission system that includes the QSM optical fiber as disclosed herein. The optical transmission system further includes an optical transmitter configured to emit light that defines an optical signal that carries information; an optical receiver optically coupled to the optical transmitter by the QSM fiber and configured to receive the light emitted by the optical transmitter and transmitted over the QSM optical fiber in the fundamental mode LP01 and the higher-order mode LP11 thereby giving rise to multipath interference (MPI), wherein the optical receiver generates an analog electrical signal from the received light; an analog-to-digital converter (ADC) that converts the analog electrical signal into a corresponding digital electrical signal; and a digital signal processor electrically connected to the ADC and configured to receive and process the digital electrical signal to mitigate the MPI and generate a processed digital signal representative of the optical signal from the optical transmitter.
Additional features and advantages are set forth in the Detailed Description that follows, and in part will be readily apparent to those skilled in the art from the description or recognized by practicing the embodiments as described in the written description and claims hereof, as well as the appended drawings. It is to be understood that both the foregoing general description and the following Detailed Description are merely exemplary, and are intended to provide an overview or framework to understand the nature and character of the claims.
The accompanying drawings are included to provide a further understanding, and are incorporated in and constitute a part of this specification. The drawings illustrate one or more embodiment(s), and together with the Detailed Description serve to explain principles and operation of the various embodiments. As such, the disclosure will become more fully understood from the following Detailed Description, taken in conjunction with the accompanying Figures, in which:
Reference is now made in detail to various embodiments of the disclosure, examples of which are illustrated in the accompanying drawings. Whenever possible, the same or like reference numbers and symbols are used throughout the drawings to refer to the same or like parts. The drawings are not necessarily to scale, and one skilled in the art will recognize where the drawings have been simplified to illustrate the key aspects of the disclosure.
The claims as set forth below are incorporated into and constitute part of this Detailed Description.
Terminology
The term “relative refractive index,” as used herein in connection with the multimode fibers and fiber cores discussed below, is defined as:
Δ(r)=[n(r)2−nS2)]/(2nS2)
where n(r) is the refractive index at radius r, unless otherwise specified and nS is the reference index. The relative refractive index is defined at the operating wavelength λp. In another aspect, nS is the index of undoped silica (SiO2). The maximum index of the index profile is denoted n0, and in most cases, n0=n(0).
As used herein, the relative refractive index is represented by Δ and its values are given in units of “%,” unless otherwise specified. In the discussion below, the reference index nREF is that for pure silica.
The term “dopant” as used herein generally refers to a substance that changes the relative refractive index of glass relative to pure (undoped) SiO2 unless otherwise indicated.
The term “mode” is short for a guided mode or optical mode. A “multimode” optical fiber means an optical fiber designed to support the fundamental guided mode and at least one higher-order guided mode over a substantial length of the optical fiber, such as 2 meters or longer. A “single-mode” optical fiber is an optical fiber designed to support a fundamental guided mode only over a substantial length of the optical fiber, such as 2 meters or longer. A “few mode” or “few-moded” optical fiber is an optical fiber designed to support a fundamental guided mode and one or two higher-order modes over a substantial length of the optical fiber, such as 2 meters or longer. A “quasi-single mode” fiber is distinguished from a “few-mode” fiber in that the former seeks to use only the fundamental mode to carry information while the latter seeks to use all of the few modes to carry information.
The term “cutoff” is used herein refers to the cutoff wavelength λc that defines the boundary for single-mode and multimode operation of an optical fiber, wherein single-mode operation of the fiber occurs for wavelengths λ>λc. The cutoff wavelength λc as the term is used herein can be measured by the standard 2 m fiber cutoff test, FOTP-80 (EIA-TIA-455-80), to yield the “fiber cutoff wavelength,” also known as the “2 m fiber cutoff” or “measured cutoff”. The FOTP-80 standard test is performed to either strip out the higher order modes using a controlled amount of bending, or to normalize the spectral response of the fiber to that of a multimode fiber.
For examples of the QSM fiber disclosed herein, the cutoff wavelength λc>1600 nm, or more preferably λc>1700 nm, or more preferably λc>1750 nm, or even more preferably λc>1800 nm.
The number of propagating modes and their characteristics in a cylindrically symmetric optical fiber with an arbitrary refractive index profile is obtained by solving the scalar wave equation (see for example T. A. Lenahan, “Calculation of modes in an optical fiber using a finite element method and EISPACK,” Bell Syst. Tech. J., vol. 62, no. 1, p. 2663, February 1983). The light traveling in an optical fiber is usually described (approximately) in terms of combinations of LP (linear polarization) modes. The LP0p modes with p>0 have two polarization degrees of freedom and are two-fold degenerate. The LPmp modes with m>0, p>0 have both two polarization and two spatial degrees of freedom. They are four-fold degenerate. In the discussion herein, polarization degeneracies are not counted when designating the number of LP modes propagating in the fiber. For example, an optical fiber in which only the LP01 mode propagates is a single-mode fiber, even though the LP01 mode has two possible polarizations. A few-mode (or “few moded”) optical fiber in which the L01 and LP11 modes propagate supports three spatial modes but nevertheless is referred herein as having two modes for ease of discussion.
As used herein, the “effective area” Aeff of an optical fiber is the cross-sectional area of the optical fiber through which light is propagated and is defined as:
where E is the electric field associated with light propagated in the fiber and r is the radius of the fiber. The effective area Aeff is determined at a wavelength of 1550 nm, unless otherwise specified.
Macrobend performance of the example QSM fibers disclosed herein was determined according to FOTP-62 (IEC-60793-1-47) by wrapping 2 turns around a mandrel having a diameter DB(e.g., DB=60 mm) and measuring the increase in attenuation due to the bending using an encircled flux (EF) launch condition.
In the discussion below, any portion of the optical fiber that is not the core is considered part of the cladding, which can have multiple sections. In some of the Figures (e.g.,
The C-band is defined as the wavelength range from 1530 nm to 1565 nm; The L-band is defined as the wavelength range from 1565 nm to 1625 nm; and the C+L wavelength band is defined as the wavelength range from 1530 nm to 1625 nm.
The limits on any ranges cited herein are considered to be inclusive and thus to lie within the stated range, unless otherwise specified.
QSM Optical Fiber
The cladding section 30 includes a number of regions, namely a first inner annular cladding region or “inner cladding” 32, a second inner annular cladding region or “moat” 34 surrounding the inner cladding, and an annular outer cladding region or “ring”38 surrounding moat 34. The shape of the core 20 is approximately triangular, but can vary from a step profile to an alpha profile. The core 20 has an outer edge 21 at a radius re, which can be considered the core radius, which in example is also equal to radius r1. In one example, the core radius re or r1>5 μm, while in another example, re or r1>7 μm.
In an example, neither the core 20 nor the cladding section 30 includes germanium. The different regions of cladding section 30 may be made of fluorine-doped silica. In an example, cladding section 30 is doped with fluorine while core 20 is doped with potassium.
The example refractive index profile of the example QSM fiber 10 of
In an example, the radius r1 represents both the radius of core 20 and the inner radius of inner cladding 32, while the radius r2 represents the outer radius of the inner cladding. The radius r3 represents the outer radius of moat 34. The radius rR represents the inner radius of ring 38. The radius rg represents the radius where ring 38 ends and the glass coating 39 of refractive index ng that makes up the rest of the QSM fiber 10 begins.
In an example, the nine fiber parameters P are designed for a nominal glass radius rg=62.5 μm. Small adjustments, to especially the cladding parameters (r3, n3) and ring parameters (nR, rR) may be required if the fiber glass radius rg is changed, which is optional for reducing bending loss. In
In an example embodiment of QSM fiber 10, n0>n1>n3>n2. In another example, n1>nR, while another example n1≦nR. Also in an example, nR>n3>n2.
The QSM fiber 10 disclosed herein has a relatively large effective area Aeff, which in one example is Aeff>150 μm2, while in another example is Aeff>170 μm2, while yet in another example is Aeff>200 μm2. The QSM fiber 10 is designed to be operated using only the fundamental mode LP01 just as in single-mode fiber, while the one additional higher-order mode LP11 is not used. The one additional higher-order mode LP11 can impair the transmission of optical signals traveling in the QSM fiber unless appropriate MP-compensating digital signal processing is applied to the received (transmitted) signal.
In an example, the fundamental mode LP01 has a fundamental-mode effective index, the higher-order mode LP11 has a higher-order-mode effective index, and wherein a difference Δneff between the fundamental-mode effective index and the higher-order-mode effective index is |Δneff|>0.001 at a wavelength of 1550 nm.
Higher-Order-Mode Impairments
The main two impairments caused by the presence of the higher-order mode LP11 in QSM fiber 10 are multipath interference (MPI) and excess loss (EL). An aspect of the disclosure includes using QSM fiber 10 for optical signal transmission while electronically mitigating MPI of the optical signal using digital signal processing techniques that are known in the art and as described in greater detail. The electronic mitigation of MPI effects enables the deployment of QSM fiber 10 in an optical transmission system. To this end, in an example, the aforementioned parameters P of QSM fiber 10 are substantially optimized, while the excess loss EL, which cannot be compensated, is substantially minimized (e.g., made substantially zero). This avoids having the excess loss EL reduce the benefit of having a relatively large effective area Aeff used to overcome detrimental non-linear effects, as explained above.
Because the higher-order mode LP11 of QSM fiber 10 is undesirable and unused, the design and configuration of QSM fiber 10 is different than that for conventional few-mode optical fibers that seek to transmit information in the higher-order modes. In particular, because conventional few-mode optical fibers seek to utilize the information transmitted in the few higher-order modes, these modes need to have relatively low differential modal attenuation (DMA). As is explained in greater detail below, the QSM fiber 10 disclosed herein has relatively high DMA, i.e., the higher-order mode LP11 is intentionally subjected to a relatively large attenuation to reduce the degree of optical transmission impairment caused by this higher-order mode.
Ideally, QSM fiber 10 would have a relatively large phase index difference between all supported modes to minimize mode-coupling, while at the same time having a small group index difference between all supported modes. This latter attribute minimizes the digital signal processing required to remove MPI artifacts from the received signal. Unfortunately, this is not possible in fibers with large effective area Aeff. Qualitatively, this is because, for any mode, the group index (ng) is related to phase index (or “effective index” ne) as follows:
The difference in the group index ng between two modes is therefore given by:
In the limit of very large effective area Aeff, the wavelength dispersion of all modes approaches that of the bulk glass, in which case the last term in the equation for Δng vanishes so that Δng≈Δne. Consequently, one cannot simultaneously have a low mode coupling (large Δne) and a small differential mode delay (DMD, small Δng).
In the QSM fiber 10 disclosed herein, low mode coupling is substantially preserved while, as noted above, the DMD is managed by intentionally designing the QSM fiber to have as much loss (i.e., a high DMA) as possible for the higher-order mode LP11. A high DMA reduces the number of equalizer taps (i.e., memory) required in the digital signal processor used for MPI compensation, thereby reducing system complexity, as described below. High DMA values also reduce the total MPI level, which may have an upper limit in terms of the efficacy of the MPI compensation digital signal processing.
In one example, the DMA for a wavelength of 1530 nm is DMA≧1.0 dB/km, while in another example, the DMA≧4.0 dB/km. Also in one example, the coupling coefficient CC between the fundamental mode LP01 and the higher-order mode LP11 at a wavelength of 1530 nm is CC<0.002 km−1, while in another example, the coupling coefficient CC<0.001 km−1.
One way to increase the DMA for the higher-order mode LP11 is to shift the cutoff wavelength λc to its lowest possible value consistent with macrobend requirements. Another way is to make the higher-order modes lossy in a mode-selective way.
In an example, axial refractive-index perturbation 52 has a wavelength resonance and includes a non-constant (e.g., chirped) period Λ that serves to to widen the bandwidth of the resonance as compared to the constant period configuration. In an example, axial refractive-index perturbation 52 can be formed in QSM fiber 10 using known methods, such as laser irradiation. In an example, the axial refractive-index perturbation 52 can be formed as the fiber is being drawn, such as by irradiating the fiber with one or more lasers. In an example, the period Λ of the refractive-index perturbation is chosen such that there is substantially no resonant coupling of the LP01 and LP11 modes in the C+L bands, and in an example at a wavelength of 1530 nm.
The so-called “Gaussian Noise (GN)” model of optical transmission posits that the launch-power-optimized system Q-factor scales with the effective area Aeff as:
Q2∝Aeff2/3
so that increasing the effective area Aeff from 150 to 175 μm2 increases Q2 by about 11% or 0.45 dB. Increasing the effective area Aeff from 150 to 250 μm2 increases Q2 by 41% or 1.5 dB. An example simulation was carried out for an erbium-doped fiber-amplified (EDFA) polarization-multiplexed (PM)-16QAM (Quadrature Amplitude Modulation) optical transmission system having 80 channels, a 32 GHz (Nyquist) channel spacing, a 50 km span length, ideal (noise and distortion-free) transmitter and receivers and a QSM fiber 10 with span loss of 0.158 dB/km. The simulation shows that increasing the effective area Aeff from 150 μm2 to 250 μm2 increases the reach at 11.25 dB from 3000 km to 4000 km. Hence, while a 1.5 dB increase in optimal Q2 seems small, it can lead to a significant reach improvement.
This simulation suggests that with 50 km spans, increasing the effective area Aeff from 150 μm2 to 250 μm2 and increasing the span loss from 0.158 dB/km to 0.215 dB/km produces no net change in Q2. Hence the excess loss EL (i.e., the additional loss resulting from mode coupling above the intrinsic LP01 attenuation) of just 0.057 dB/km can completely erase the advantage of the increase in effective area Aeff. An excess loss EL of even 0.01 dB/km can decrease the reach of QSM fiber 10 with an effective area Aeff=250 μm2 by about 200 km. The advantage of large effective area fibers with an effective area Aeff of less than 250 μm2 would likewise be reduced.
It was found through modeling that conventional refractive index profiles cannot achieve sufficiently large DMA and effective areas Aeff exceeding 175 μm2 without also introducing excess macrobend loss. However, it was also found that the judicious addition of the ring 38 of increased refractive index nR relative to the refractive index nc of the outer cladding 34 can enhance the LP11 mode coupling to the glass coating 39, thereby increasing the DMA without significantly impacting bend performance. In this regard, the index nR of the ring 38 must not exceed the effective index neff of the fundamental mode. In an example, ring 38 includes at least one absorbing dopant that contribute to the attenuation of the higher-order mode LP11. Examples of absorbing dopants include titanium or other transition metals. In another example, ring 38 does not include any absorbing dopants. In an example, ring 38 includes fluorine dopant, which is not an absorbing dopant.
Example QSM Fibers
Table 1 below sets forth example QSM fiber parameters P for three examples of QSM fiber 10. In the Tables below, P stands for the given parameter, “MIN1” and “MAX1” stand for first example minimum and maximum values for the given parameter, “MIN2” and “MAX2” for second example minimum and maximum values for the given parameter, and “MIN3” and “MAX3” for third example minimum and maximum values for the given parameter. The parameters P in the following Tables are based on QSM fiber 10 having a nominal radius rg=62.5 μm.
Table 2 below is an alternative representation of the refractive index data of Table 1. In Table 2, the refractive index change relative to pure silica is used. This refractive index change is represented by the relative refractive index Δ, which is given by
where n is the refractive index value from the tables above (at 1550 nm) and nS=1.444374, the refractive index of pure silica.
The second example of QSM fiber 10 is set forth in Table 3 below and represents an example of the “no ring” configuration such as shown in
The third example of QSM fiber 10 is set forth in Table 4 below and represents another example of the “no ring” configuration.
QSM Properties of Example Profiles
Table 5 below summarizes the predicted optical properties of the three example profiles p1, p2 and p3 of
Relationship Between DMA and NT
One of the advantages of QSM fiber 10 is that it reduces the number of taps needed for the digital signal processor used for MPI compensation in an optical transmission system.
In
The amount of significantly delayed contributions (the tail of the dashed black line) is decreased as the DMA increases. This enables use of a QSM fiber 10 having a relatively large DMD with a digital signal processor having a reduced number NT of taps as compared to conventional MPI compensation.
The plots of
Optical Transmission System with QSM Fiber
The digital signal processor DSP includes an MPI mitigation system 134 that in example includes a plurality of equalizer taps 136. System 10 and in particular MPI mitigation system 134 is configured to perform electronic equalization of optical transmission impairments to the optical signal using methods known in the art. In one example, MPI mitigation system 134 includes four finite impulse response (FIR) filters in a butterfly structure (not shown), wherein each filter has a number of taps 136, which are recursively adjusted based on a least-mean-square (LMS) algorithm.
The QSM fiber section 10 includes an input end 112 optically connected to optical transmitter 110 and an output end 114 optically connected to optical receiver 130, thereby establishing an optical connection between the optical transmitter and the optical receiver. In an example, QSM fiber 10 includes an amplifier 160, e.g., an EDFA.
In the operation of system 100, transmitter 110 generates light 200 that defines an input analog optical signal OS that carries information only in the fundamental mode LP01. Light 200 enters the input end 112 of QSM fiber 10 and travels the length of the fiber to output end 114. Most of light 200 travels in the fundamental mode (LP01) while a portion of the light travels in the higher-order mode LP11. The light 200 is denoted as 200′ at the output end of QSM fiber 10 due the light having impairments described above by virtue of having traveled through QSM fiber 10.
Optical receiver 130 receives light 200′ as emitted from the output end 114 of QSM fiber 10 and converts this light into a corresponding analog electrical signal SA. The analog electrical signal SA passes through analog-to-digital converter ADC, which forms therefrom a corresponding digital electrical signal SD. The digital electrical signal SD is then received by digital signal processor DSP, which performs digital processing of the digital electrical signal. In particular, the digital signal processor DSP is configured to perform equalization of MPI using MPI mitigation system 134 and the equalizer taps 136 therein based on techniques known in the art. The digital signal processor DSP outputs a processed digital electrical signal SDP that is representative (to within the limits of MPI mitigation system 134) of the initial optical signal OS generated by transmitter 110. The processed digital electrical signal SDP, which includes the information originally encoded into optical system OS, continues downstream to be processed as needed (e.g., by a decision circuit 150) for the given application.
As noted above, the relatively high DMA of ≧1 dB/km or >4 dB/km results in less complex digital signal processing, i.e., the number NT of equalizer taps 136 is reduced as compared to conventional optical transmission systems that employ MPI compensation. Also, as noted above, high DMA values also reduce the total MPI level, which may have an upper limit in terms of the efficacy of the MPI compensation digital signal processing.
It will be apparent to those skilled in the art that various modifications to the preferred embodiments of the disclosure as described herein can be made without departing from the spirit or scope of the disclosure as defined in the appended claims. Thus, the disclosure covers the modifications and variations provided they come within the scope of the appended claims and the equivalents thereto.
This application claims the benefit of priority under 35 U.S.C. §119 of U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 62/056,784 filed on Sep. 29, 2014, which is related to U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 62/086,383, filed Dec. 2, 2014, and entitled “Optical transmission systems and methods using a QSM large-effective-area optical fiber,” which application is incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
6327403 | Danziger | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6418256 | Danziger et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6640027 | Kim et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6839484 | White | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6888991 | White | May 2005 | B2 |
7483612 | Digiovanni | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7526169 | Bickham et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
8670643 | Li | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8693834 | Bickham | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8837892 | Bennett | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8948559 | Gruner-Nielsen | Feb 2015 | B2 |
8971682 | Evans et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
9128237 | Mukasa | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9250383 | Gruner-Nielsen et al. | Feb 2016 | B2 |
20030142940 | Qi | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030210877 | Berkey | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040114892 | Chiang et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20070002924 | Hutchinson et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20080124028 | Bickham | May 2008 | A1 |
20080205839 | Bickham | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20100014873 | Bulow | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20110200339 | Komaki et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20130064554 | Li et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130071114 | Bickham et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130071115 | Bennett et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130216176 | Li et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130230290 | Evans | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20140064686 | Lars et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140093205 | Gruner-Nielsen et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140161404 | Fini | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20160091660 | Li et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160154175 | Downie | Jun 2016 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
05394344 | Jan 2014 | JP |
2009014623 | Jan 2009 | WO |
2013039939 | Mar 2013 | WO |
2014021894 | Feb 2014 | WO |
Entry |
---|
I. Roudas, et al., “Comparison of analytical models for the nonlinear noise in dispersive coherent optical communications systems,” IEEE Photonics Conference, paper MG3.4, Bellevue, WA, Sep. 2013. |
Sui, et al. “256 Gb/s PM-16-QAM quasi-single-mode transmission over 2600 km using few-mode fiber with multi-path interference compensation” (OFC 2014 paper M3C.5). |
S.J. Savory, “Digital filters for coherent optical receivers,” Optics Express, vol. 16, No. 2, Jan. 21, 2008, pp. 804-818. |
S.P. Jung, et al. “Quasi single-mode fiber for the cost effective implementation of broadband access networks” (OFC 2007, paper JThA2). |
N. Kamikawa “A quasi-single mode optical fiber for long-haul transmission in severe bending environments” (IEEE PTL 6(3) 1994 pp. 428-430). |
F. Yaman, et al. “10×112Gb/s PDM-QPSK transmission over 5032 km in few-mode fibers”, Optics Express, 18(20), pp. 21342-21349, 2010. |
F. Yaman, et al. “Long distance transmission in few-mode fibers”, Optics Express, 18(12), pp. 13250-13257, 2010. |
F. Yaman et al, “Impact of Modal Crosstalk and Multi-Path Interference on Few-Mode Fiber Transmission,” OFC 2012, paper OTu1D.2 (2012). |
J. D. Downie et al, “Transmission of 112 Gb/s PM-QPSK signals over up to 635 km of multimode optical fiber,” Optics Express, vol. 19, B363-B369 (2011). |
N. Bai et al, “Adaptive frequency-domain equalization for the transmission of the fundamental mode in a few-mode • fiber,” Optics Express vol. 20, 204010-24017 (2012). |
P. Siska, et al. “Coupling conditions for quasi-single mode optical fibers with different refractive index profile” (Proc. SPIE 8774, Optical Sensors 2013, 87741T (May 3, 2013)). |
Jiang Sun et al., “Novel bending-resistant design of two-layer low-index trench fiber with parabolic-profile core”, Optics Express, Jul. 28, 2014,vol. 22, No. 151, 18036-18043. |
Alan Pak Tao Lau et al., “Long-haul Quasi-Single-Mode Transmission using Few-Mode Fiber with Multi-Path Interference Compensation”, The 12'th international Conference on Optical Internet Proceedings, 2014 IEEE , 978-1-4799-6507-6/14, FB3-1. |
International Search Report, issued in connection with corresponding PCT application No. PCT/US2015/051589, dated Nov. 17, 2015. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20160091660 A1 | Mar 2016 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62056784 | Sep 2014 | US |