Patent Application
20240344158
This application relates to a quenching apparatus for a metal sheet with which it is possible to inhibit shape defects from occurring in the metal sheet when quenching is performed by using continuous annealing equipment, in which annealing is performed while the metal sheet is continuously passed, and to continuous annealing equipment, a method for quenching a metal sheet, a method for manufacturing a cold rolled steel sheet, and a method for manufacturing a coated steel sheet.
When a metal sheet such as a steel sheet is manufactured, material properties are imparted by, for example, allowing phase transformation to occur by cooling the metal sheet after having heated the metal sheet in continuous annealing equipment. Nowadays, there is a growing demand in the automobile industry for a high strength steel sheet (high tensile strength steel sheet) having reduced thickness to simultaneously achieve weight reduction and satisfactory crash safety in automobile bodies. Therefore, increased importance is placed on a rapid cooling technique, which is advantageous in manufacturing the high tensile strength steel sheet. Among various kinds of cooling methods, cooling methods utilizing water are widely used because such methods provide a high cooling rate at low cost. However, since such cooling methods have a potential to cause a temperature variation in the steel sheet due to such a high cooling rate, there is a problem in that shape defects such as warpage, wavy deformation, and the like may occur in the steel sheet due to out-of-plane deformation. To date, various methods have been proposed to prevent such shape defects from occurring when water quenching is performed on a steel sheet.
Patent Literature 1 proposes a method in which, to inhibit wavelike deformation from occurring in a metal sheet when rapid-cooling quenching is performed in a continuous annealing furnace, bridle rolls are installed upstream and downstream of a rapid-cooling quenching region to change tension applied to a steel sheet which is subjected to a rapid-cooling quenching process.
Patent Literature 2 proposes a method in which, by focusing on the fact that a shape defect occurs due to buckling occurring in a metal sheet because of thermal compressive stress in the width direction of the metal sheet generated at a quenching start point (cooling start point), out-of-plane deformation is inhibited by restraining the metal sheet from both surface sides of the metal sheet in the region in which the compressive stress in the width direction of the metal sheet is generated by cooling or in the vicinity of such a region.
In addition, Patent Literature 3 proposes a method in which, when the Ms temperature, at which the martensite transformation of a metal sheet starts, is defined as TMs (° C.) and the Mf temperature, at which the martensite transformation of the metal sheet finishes, is defined as TMf (° C.), the metal sheet that is being subjected to rapid-cooling quenching is restrained by using a restraining roll pair placed in a coolant while the temperature of the metal sheet is in the temperature range of (TMs+150° C.) to (TMf-150° C.).
Moreover, Patent Literature 4 proposes an apparatus having a water tank containing a liquid in which a metal sheet is immersed, an injection device having plural injection nozzles through which a liquid is injected onto the front and back surfaces of the metal sheet, and one or plural restraining roll pairs with which the metal sheet is restrained and a method in which the liquid is injected through all of the injection nozzles of the injection device in the direction toward the restraining rolls.
However, in the case of any one of the methods disclosed in Patent Literature 1 to Patent Literature 4, since the sheet thickness of the metal sheet or the sheet passing speed of the metal sheet in the water tank is not taken into consideration when the metal sheet is restrained by using the restraining rolls, there is a problem in that it is not possible to restrain the metal sheet by using the restraining rolls while the temperature of the metal sheet is in the temperature range of (TMs+150° C.) to (TMf-150° C.). As a result, there is a problem in that shape defects occur after the metal sheet has been subjected to quenching.
The disclosed embodiments have been completed in view of the situation described above, and an object of the disclosed embodiments is to provide a quenching apparatus for a metal sheet with which it is possible to inhibit shape defects from occurring in the metal sheet when quenching is performed regardless of the sheet passing speed or the sheet thickness of the metal sheet, continuous annealing equipment, a method for quenching a metal sheet, a method for manufacturing a cold rolled steel sheet, and a method for manufacturing a coated steel sheet.
The subject matter of the disclosed embodiments to solve the problems described above is as follows.
According to the quenching apparatus for a metal sheet, the method for quenching a metal sheet, and the method for manufacturing a steel sheet according to the disclosed embodiments, it is possible to inhibit shape defects from occurring in the metal sheet when quenching is performed regardless of the sheet passing speed or the sheet thickness of the metal sheet.
Hereafter, an embodiment will be described with reference to the figures. Although cases where water, which is inexpensive and industrially useful, is used as a coolant will be described below, there is no particular limitation on the coolant as long as it is a liquid which can be used for cooling.
There may be a case where the metal sheet S is to be quenched on the exit side of a continuous annealing furnace to achieve desired material properties. However, it is known that shape defects occur in the metal sheet S due to thermal shrinkage caused by rapid cooling for a quenching treatment. In particular, in the case where martensite transformation occurs in the metal sheet S, since rapid thermal shrinkage and transformation expansion occur simultaneously in the temperature range of the martensite start temperature (TMs (° C.)) to the martensite finish temperature (TMf (° C.)), stress generated in the metal sheet S peaks, which results in a deterioration in the shape of the metal sheet S. Here, it is possible to calculate TMs (° C.) and TMf (° C.) from the chemical composition of the metal sheet S.
In particular, in the case where it is possible to physically restrain the metal sheet S while the temperature of the metal sheet S which is being subjected to rapid cooling for quenching is equal to or lower than (TMs+150° C.) and equal to or higher than (TMf−150° C.), it is possible to stabilize the shape. In addition, it is more preferable that the temperature be equal to or lower than (TMs+100° C.) and equal to or higher than (TMf−100° C.).
In response to such a requirement, a technique utilizing restraining roll pairs 4 which are arranged so that the rolls constituting each roll pair face each other across the surfaces of the metal sheet S immersed in cooling water in a temperature range in which martensite transformation occurs is proposed. However, in the case of a simple constitution, that is, in the case where only one restraining roll pair 4 is used, it is necessary to place limitations on the sheet passing speed and sheet thickness of the metal sheet S to restrain the metal sheet S in the appropriate temperature range of the metal sheet S. Therefore, the disclosed embodiments are focused on placing plural restraining roll pairs 4 in the cooling water.
Next, in the case of the disclosed embodiments, by placing plural restraining roll pairs 4 as illustrated in
In the disclosed embodiments, cooling is promoted by using a water injection apparatus 3 having plural water injection nozzles 3a. As illustrated in
Incidentally, it is not appropriate that the jet flow impinging position be excessively near to the water surface W because, since the jet flow impinging position is influenced by a variation in the position of the water surface W, a position at which a vapor film is removed is unstable, which results in the cooling capacity being largely influenced. On the other hand, it is not appropriate that the jet flow impinging position be excessively far from the water surface W because, since there is an increase in the temperature of the injected water while flowing down, there is a decrease in the cooling capacity in the region in which the water flows down, which results in the occurrence of transition boiling. Therefore, it is preferable that the distance between the water surface W and the jet flow impinging position, which is denoted by A, be about 5 mm to 50 mm (or 10 mm).
To date, it has been recommended that the water injection nozzles 3a be arranged so as to tilt at the positions nearest the restraining roll pair 4 (refer to
However, in the case where the water injection nozzles are arranged so as to tilt as illustrated in
In addition, such conditions are satisfied in the case where the quenched material is a metal sheet S having a martensite start temperature (TMs (° C.)) of 450° C. or lower or preferably 400° C. or lower.
As pointed out conventionally, there is a significant decrease in cooling rate at the roll side in the case where a vapor film is not removed when restraining is performed by using rolls at a high temperature. However, since it is preferable that restraining not be performed in such a temperature range for the first time, such a phenomenon poses no problem.
Therefore, in the disclosed embodiments, by providing a moving system with which the restraining roll pairs 4 move independently from each other in a direction for the restraining rolls 4a to push the metal sheet S or to draw away from the metal sheet S, it is possible to achieve a stable cooling state, even in the case where the water injection nozzles 3a are arranged in a manner such that cooling water is injected in facing directions from the front and back surface sides of the metal sheet S. To inject the cooling water through the water injection nozzles 3a in facing directions across the metal sheet S, it is necessary to arrange the water injection nozzles 3a almost perpendicularly to the sheet passing direction of the metal sheet S. Specifically, when the inclination angle of the water injection nozzle 3a with respect to the metal sheet S is defined as θ, the expression “almost perpendicularly” denotes a case where e is 80° or more and 100° or less, preferably 82° or more and 98° or less, or more preferably 87° or more and 93° or less.
Specifically, restraining roll pairs 4 which are located at positions where the temperature of the metal sheet S is in a temperature range in which transition boiling may occur are withdrawn, and the metal sheet S is restrained by using the other restraining roll pairs 4. Here, each of the restraining roll pairs 4 may have a system with which the pair moves independently from other pairs, and instead each of the rolls (restraining roll 4a) constituting the pair may have a system with which the roll moves independently from the other roll.
Incidentally, restraining roll pairs to be withdrawn or used should be determined in accordance with operation conditions. The expression “operation conditions” denotes heat treatment conditions and cooling conditions; and, in particular, the sheet passing speed, the sheet thickness, the quenching start temperature, and the warpage of the metal sheet are items having large influences. In the case of an identical steel grade, and in the case where the heat treatment conditions before quenching is performed and a distance between a position at which the heat treatment is finished and a position at which cooling is started are identical, it is preferable that such a determination be made in accordance with the sheet passing speed and the sheet thickness. Examples of a method for determining restraining roll pairs to be used include the method described above (the restraining roll pairs to be used are determined in accordance with positions corresponding to the preferable temperature range described in paragraph 0018 which are derived in accordance with the sheet passing speed and the sheet thickness) and a method in which preferable restraining roll pairs are selected to be used on the basis of accumulated data regarding the relationship between the combination of operation conditions and restraining roll pairs used and shape stability.
That is, when the metal sheet S is quenched, by adjusting the positions of the plural restraining roll pairs 4 with respect to the metal sheet S in accordance with operation conditions, that is, in accordance with the sheet passing speed and the sheet thickness, it is possible to restrain the metal sheet S with certainty while the temperature of the metal sheet S is equal to or lower than (TMs+150° C.) and equal to or higher than (TMf−150° C.), that is, in the preferable temperature range. Although the sheet passing speed and the sheet thickness may be used as the operation conditions, the product of the sheet passing speed and the sheet thickness (hereinafter, referred to as “LSD”) may also be used. In this case, when any one of the sheet passing speed and the sheet thickness varies (increases or decreases), LSD also varies. When the positions of the plural restraining roll pairs 4 are adjusted, for example, the restraining roll pairs to be used, the distance between the restraining roll pairs, the intermesh value, the offset value described below, and the like are adjusted.
In the case of a method for improving shape by using restraining rolls, there may be a case where scrape occurs due to roll slip. It is considered to be because there may be a case where the metal sheet S is severely vibrated due to the water jet flow impinging on the metal sheet S in a turbulent flow state and because, since a water film tends to enter a gap between the restraining roll 4a and the metal sheet S, slip may occur due to a so-called hydroplaning phenomenon. As a countermeasure for the former case, it is preferable that the metal sheet S be restrained by using plural restraining roll pairs 4 because this results in a significant improvement in vibration level. Moreover, as a countermeasure for the latter case, by increasing the maximum height roughness Rz of the surface of the restraining rolls 4a to 5 μm or more, it is possible to prevent slip from occurring due to an improvement in water-dissipation capability.
However, in the case where Rz is larger than a certain value, the effect of preventing slip becomes saturated, and flaws tend to occur due to roughness. Therefore, the upper limit of Rz is set to be 50 μm or less. Here, the maximum height roughness Rz is prescribed in Japanese Industrial Standards “JIS B 0601 Surface Roughness (2001)” and derived in accordance with “JIS B 0633” from a profile in the width direction of the metal sheet S, that is, the longitudinal direction of the restraining rolls 4a, obtained by using a two-dimensional roughness meter. In addition, the measurement method adopted by a measurement device may be of a contact type or a non-contact type as long as the obtained measurement results satisfy the prescription in “JIS B 0601 surface roughness”.
There is also a preferable range for the diameter (D (mm)) of the restraining rolls 4a for the reasons described below. In the case where the diameter of the restraining rolls 4a is large, since the water flow becomes unstable due to an increase in the degree of interference with the water flow, the state of the removal of a vapor film becomes unstable, which results in the shape of the metal sheet S becoming unstable. In addition, it is not preferable that there be an increase in roll diameter because this results in an increase in the length of the coolant jet flow which is disturbed by the rolls, which makes it difficult to achieve a sufficient cooling length. Therefore, it is preferable that the roll diameter be 250 mm or less. On the other hand, in the case where the roll diameter is excessively small, since deflection occurs in the rolls when restraining the metal sheet S, there is a decrease in force for restraining the metal sheet S, which results in the effect of correcting shape not being realized. Therefore, it is preferable that the roll diameter be 50 mm or more.
Incidentally,
In addition, there is no particular limitation on the movement I (I.M: intermesh value) of the restraining roll pair 4 in the metal sheet S pushing-in direction, and such an optimum movement should be separately set for each of the restraining roll pairs 4 in accordance with the strength and arrangement of the metal sheet S to be restrained and the number of the restraining roll pairs 4. However, in the case where the movement in the pushing-in direction is small, since slip tends to occur, there is an increased risk of scrape occurring. On the other hand, in the case where the movement is large, the occurrence of shape defects may be promoted. Therefore, there is an appropriate value. In the case where a steel sheet is used as the metal sheet S, when the sheet thickness is defined as t (mm), it is preferable that the movement of the restraining roll pair 4 in the metal sheet S-pushing-in direction be −t (mm) to (+10×t) (mm). Here, as specifically described with reference to
The position of the restraining roll pair 4 may be adjusted in accordance with information about the warpage of the metal sheet S. There is no particular limitation on the information about the warpage of the metal sheet S, and such information may be based on predicted values or measured values. In the case where the warpage of the metal sheet S is measured, examples of the measurement position of the warpage include three positions, that is, a position upstream of the water tank 2, a position downstream of the water tank 2, and an offline position, and a combination thereof may be used. The measurement of the warpage of the metal sheet S may be performed by using a laser-type distance meter or the like. It is advantageous that the measurement is performed before the metal sheet S is cooled because this makes it possible to determine the conditions applied for the restraining roll pairs 4 (restraining roll pairs to be used, distances between the restraining roll pairs, intermesh values, offset values, and the like), without delay. In the case where the measurement is performed after the metal sheet S has been cooled, although it is not possible to avoid a delay in determining the conditions due to a time lag, since the determination is made on the basis of information about the practical warpage of the metal sheet S, it is possible to appropriately adjust the restraining roll pairs 4. In the case where the warpage of the metal sheet S is measured offline, there is an increased delay in determining the conditions applied for the restraining roll pairs 4, but there is an advantage in that, for example, it is possible to perform manual measurement.
That is, when the metal sheet S is quenched, the positions of the plural restraining roll pairs 4 with respect to the metal sheet S may be adjusted in accordance with operation conditions including not only the sheet passing speed and the sheet thickness but also the information about warpage of the metal sheet S. In addition, also in this case where the positions of the plural restraining roll pairs 4 are adjusted, the restraining roll pairs to be used, the distances between the restraining roll pairs, the intermesh values, the offset values, and the like may be adjusted as in the case of the restraining roll pair 4.
In addition, regarding adjacent restraining roll pairs 4, the expression “distance between restrain roll pairs 4” (denoted by C in
Under the assumption that the restraining rolls 4a in a restraining roll pair 4 have a moving system with which the rolls move toward or draw away from the sheet passing direction P of the metal strip S, in the case where one restraining roll pair is withdrawn, technically, the distance between the restraining roll pairs 4 is doubled and the number of the restraining roll pairs 4 is halved. However, in the case where the original distance C between the restraining roll pairs 4 is not appropriately set in advance, it is not possible to realize the effect of correcting shape.
The appropriate range of the distance C is set to be D (mm) or more and 10×D (mm) or less. It is not preferable that the distance C between the restraining roll pairs 4 be less than D (mm) because, in this case, since water which is injected through the water injection nozzles 3a is disturbed by the restraining roll pairs 4 before the water reaches the metal sheet S, sufficient cooling capacity is not achieved, which results in an increase in the size of the equipment due to an increase in distance necessary for shape correction. In addition, since there is an increase in the number of points at which the metal sheet S and the restraining roll pairs 4 come into contact, there is an increased risk of the occurrence of surface defects such as pressing flaws, slip flaws, and the like. On the other hand, in the case where the distance C is more than 10×D (mm), since there is an increase in distance between a point at which the metal sheet S is restrained by one restraining roll pair 4 and a point at which the metal sheet S is restrained by the next restraining roll pair 4, it is not possible to realize the effect due to plural restraining roll pairs 4 being placed.
The restraining rolls 4a should be made of a material having excellent thermal conductivity and strength sufficient to endure a load placed on the rolls when the rolls compress the metal sheet. Examples of such a material include heat-resistant steel (for example, KHR12C), stainless steel (SUS304, SUS310), ceramics, and the like, but CFRP easily realizes the effect of roll restraining and is advantageous especially for achieving satisfactory cooling capacity because the deflection of a roll made of CFRP is small even in the case where the roll diameter is small.
As described above, since the disclosed embodiments are intended to reduce complex and nonuniform, wavy shape which occurs due to microstructure volume expansion caused by martensite transformation occurring when the metal sheet S is rapidly cooled, it is preferable that the disclosed embodiments be used in a method for manufacturing a cold rolled steel sheet. In addition, the relevant cold rolled steel sheet may be subjected to a coating treatment. Examples of the coating treatment which may be performed include an electro-galvanizing treatment, a hot-dip galvanizing treatment, and a hot-dip galvannealing treatment.
More specifically, it is preferable that the disclosed embodiments be used for manufacturing a high strength steel sheet (high tensile strength steel sheet) having a tensile strength of 580 MPa or higher. There is no particular limitation on the upper limit of the tensile strength as long as the roll material or the like withstands high strength, and, in the case where stainless steel (SUS304, SUS310), ceramics, or the like is used for the rolls, it is expected for the effects to be realized even when the tensile strength is about 3000 MPa.
Examples of the high strength steel sheet (high tensile strength steel sheet) described above include a high strength cold rolled steel sheet and steel sheets which are manufactured by performing a surface treatment on the high strength cold rolled steel sheet, that is, a hot-dip galvanized steel sheet, an electro-galvanized steel sheet, a hot-dip galvannealed steel sheet, and the like. That is, it is preferable that a high strength cold rolled steel sheet, a hot-dip galvanized steel sheet, an electro-galvanized steel sheet, and a hot-dip galvannealed steel sheet be manufactured by performing continuous annealing utilizing the quenching apparatus for the metal sheet S and the method for quenching the metal sheet S according to the disclosed embodiments.
Specific examples of the high strength steel sheet include one having a chemical composition containing, by mass %, C: 0.04% or more and 0.25% or less, Si: 0.01% or more and 2.50% or less, Mn: 0.80% or more and 3.70% or less, P: 0.001% or more and 0.090% or less, S: 0.0001% or more and 0.0050% or less, sol.Al: 0.005% or more and 0.065% or less, optionally at least one of Cr, Mo, Nb, V, Ni, Cu, and Ti in an amount of 0.5% or less each, optionally at least one of B and Sb in an amount of 0.01% or less each, and a balance of Fe and incidental impurities.
Incidentally, it is possible to use the disclosed embodiments for rapidly cooling metal sheets in general. In addition, the disclosure is not intended to be limited to the embodiment which is described as an example and in which cooling is performed by using a water immersion method, and it is possible to use the disclosed embodiments as a method for preventing deformation from occurring in a steel sheet due to transformation by physically restraining the steel in processes in general regardless of whether the relevant process is a heating process or a cooling process.
Hereafter, examples in which metal sheets were manufactured by using the quenching apparatus for a metal sheet, the method for quenching a metal sheet, and a method for manufacturing a steel sheet according to the disclosed embodiments will be described.
By using the quenching apparatus 1 illustrated in
Incidentally, the representative chemical composition of the high tension cold rolled steel sheet having a tensile strength of 1470 MPa class contained, by mass %, C: 0.20%, Si: 1.0%, Mn: 2.3%, P: 0.005%, and S: 0.002%. Here, the Ms temperature (TMs (° C.)) of such a high tension cold rolled steel sheet is 400° C., and the Mf temperature (TMf (° C.)) of the steel sheet is 300° C. In this case, the temperature range of the steel sheet in which restraining utilizing the restraining roll pairs 4 is effective is 150° C. to 550° C.
In addition, the roll diameter (D) of the restraining rolls 4a was 150 mm. The distance in the sheet passing direction provided between the central axes of the restraining rolls 4a in a restraining roll pair 4 was 75 mm (B in
Incidentally, in the case where the restraining roll pairs 4 were used to push the metal sheet S without withdrawing the restraining roll pairs 4, the base condition was set to be a case where movement of restraining rolls in metal sheet S pushing-in direction was 0 mm. That is, in the case where “0.0 mm” in the column “I.M” in Table 1 denotes a state in which the restraining roll pair 4 pushed the metal sheet S. In more detail, in the case where I.M is “0.0 mm”, the surfaces of the restraining rolls 4a in the restraining roll pair 4 reach the central position of the metal sheet S. In other words, in the case where I.M is “0.0 mm”, the surfaces of the restraining rolls 4a in the restraining roll pair 4 are moved in the metal sheet pushing-in direction by a distance of half the sheet thickness of the metal sheet S. On the other hand, in the case of example 7 and example 9, the movement in the metal sheet pushing-in direction was changed. This was because, under the conditions of the two cases, since the heights of the restraining rolls 4a on the front and back surface sides of the metal sheet S were the same (offset value was 0), it was not possible physically for the restraining rolls to push the metal sheet. Although, it was possible theoretically to move the metal sheet from the pass line by a distance of half the sheet thickness, since there was a risk of an excessive increase in load, allowance was taken into consideration in setting.
The evaluations of the examples were conducted from the viewpoint of the warpage quantity (mm) and surface quality of the metal sheet S which had been cooled. As illustrated in
Hereafter, comparative examples 1 to 5 and examples 1 to 16 given in Table 1 will be described.
In the case of comparative example 1, the restraining roll pair 4 was not placed, and the metal sheet S was cooled by injecting water through the water injection nozzles 3a in the direction perpendicular to the sheet passing direction P of the metal sheet S. The warpage quantity of the metal sheet S was 34.5 mm, which means a shape defect occurred.
In the case of comparative examples 2 to 5, the number of restraining roll pairs 4 was one, and, in the case of comparative example 5, the water injection direction was 60° with respect to the steel sheet. In the case of comparative examples 3 and 4, since the restraining roll pair 4 was placed within the preferable temperature range for restraining derived from the transformation temperature of the metal sheet, there was an improvement in warpage quantity. In the case of comparative examples 2 and 5, there was no improvement in warpage. From these results, it was clarified that, in the case of one restraining roll pair 4, it was not possible to respond to a change in the product of the sheet passing speed and sheet thickness of the metal sheet S (LSD). In addition, there was a deterioration in shape in the case of an oblique water injection direction. The reason for this is because, since there was a substantial decrease in cooling capacity, there was an increase in the temperature of the metal sheet S which passed through the restraining roll pair 4.
On the other hand, examples 1 to 6 show the results of the cases where two restraining roll pairs 4 were placed. In addition, in the case of examples 1 to 3, the restraining roll pair 4 to be used was selected (the movement conditions of the restraining roll pairs 4 were selected) in accordance with LSD, and, as a result, it was clarified that it is possible to respond a wide range of a change in LSD. Here, a metal sheet for which the disclosed embodiments are mainly intended is a steel sheet, and it is possible to organize the sheet cooling state in accordance with LSD. Therefore, the larger the LSD, the more difficult it is to cool the metal sheet, and the larger the distances from the cooling start position to the martensite start position and the martensite finish position. Therefore, it is preferable to select the restraining roll pairs 4 placed at lower positions in
In contrast, in the case of examples 4 to 6 where the two restraining roll pairs 4 were both used, there was a deterioration in the warpage of the metal sheet S under some conditions. Therefore, the withdrawal function of the restraining rolls 4a (moving function of the restraining roll pairs 4) is necessary to respond to changes in sheet passing speed and sheet thickness.
In the case of examples 7 to 14, on the basis of the conditions of example 2, the offset value (distance in the sheet passing direction P of the metal strip S between the restraining rolls 4a in a restraining roll pair 4) and the maximum height roughness Rz of the restraining rolls 4a are changed. In the case of an offset value of 0 (example 7 and example 9), as described above, due to the limitations on the movement in the sheet pushing-in direction of the restraining rolls 4a, there was a deterioration in warpage quantity compared with the results of example 2. On the other hand, in the case of example 8 and example 10 where the offset value was 200 mm, there was a deterioration in the warpage quantity of the metal sheet S under the condition of a sheet thickness of 1 mm. From these results, it was clarified that it is necessary to appropriately set the offset value.
Moreover, from the results of examples 11 to 14, it was clarified that there may be a deterioration in the external appearance of the metal sheet S depending on the maximum height roughness Rz of the restraining rolls 4a. It was clarified that, to maintain the external appearance of the surface of the metal sheet S, both the largest and smallest values of the maximum height roughness Rz should be set to be 5 μm to 50 μm.
Example 15 is an example in which quenching was performed with reference to examples 4 to 6. By using the plural restraining roll pairs 4, it was possible to realize the effect of correcting shape of the metal sheet S to some extent. In the case of example 16, by selecting roll pairs to be used from the plural restraining roll pairs 4 in accordance with the product of the sheet passing speed and sheet thickness of the metal sheet S (LSD) and the measurement results of the warpage of the metal sheet S to thereby adjust the positions at which the metal sheet S was restrained and the distance between the restraining roll pairs, it is possible to suppress the warpage quantity of the metal sheet S to be 3.1 mm. Here, although, in this example (example 16), restraining roll pairs to be used were selected to thereby adjust the distance between the restraining roll pairs, the items to be adjusted may be the intermesh values and offset values. Regarding the measurement of the warpage of the metal sheet S, by placing a laser displacement meter at any position in the sheet passing direction P of the metal sheet S, and by using the measurement results of the warpage derived from such a laser displacement meter, various kinds of conditions applied for the plural restraining roll pairs 4 may be determined.
The present inventors diligently conducted investigations to solve the problems described above and to thereby complete the quenching apparatus for a metal sheet, a method for quenching a metal sheet, and a method for manufacturing a steel sheet according to the disclosed embodiments and, as a result, the following knowledge was obtained.
Although, to achieve a good shape of the metal sheet S, restraining the metal sheet S by using restraining rolls 4a to inhibit out-of-plane deformation occurring in the metal sheet S in the temperature range of (TMs+150) (° C.) to (TMf−150) (° C.) is effective, it is necessary to place significant limitations on the sheet passing speed and sheet thickness of the metal sheet S to satisfy such conditions by using only one restraining roll pair 4. In response to such a problem, the idea that, by using plural restraining roll pairs 4, it is possible to relax significantly the limitations on the conditions under which the metal sheet S passes through the restraining roll pairs 4 in the good temperature range was conceived.
Although, to respond to changes in the LS, sheet thickness, and the like of the metal sheet S, plural restraining roll pairs 4 should be placed as described above, there may be a case where the shape of the metal sheet S is not stabilized or scrape or the like occurs due to the restraining roll pairs 4, unless the restraining roll pairs 4 are placed under appropriate conditions.
The destabilization of the shape of the metal sheet S is caused by the unstableness of the cooling capacity, and this was presumed to be because of the destabilization of the vapor film-removing capability due to a water flow. Generally, it is known that, when cooling is performed for water quenching, the contact state between the metal sheet S and water (boiling state) varies in accordance with the temperature range of the metal sheet S in the cooling process; that is, film boiling, transition boiling, and nucleate boiling occur in this order as the temperature decreases, which results in a variation in cooling rate and cooling uniformity. In addition, it was considered that, to realize rapid cooling while maintaining temperature uniformity, performing cooling only in the nucleate boiling range is important and, for such a purpose, removing a vapor film uniformly is important. To realize this, a method in which slit nozzles are placed on the front and back surface sides of the metal sheet S to spray a water flow onto the surfaces has been put into practice.
In addition, from the results of the investigation conducted by the present inventors, it was found that multiple parallel jet flows provided by using water injection nozzles 3a for injecting a coolant which are arranged in plural parallel lines are significantly unstable due to peripheral flows. In the case where the jet flows are unstable, since the positions at which the jet flows impinge on the metal sheet S also are unstable, the removal of the vapor film becomes unstable. Therefore, it was found that, in the case where the restraining rolls 4a are simply added, since the state of the removal of the vapor film becomes unstable, there may be a deterioration in the shape of the metal sheet S on the contrary. On the other hand, it was considered that scratch occurring in the surface of the metal sheet S is a defect caused by the slip of the restraining rolls 4a and that such a defect is caused by a hydroplaning phenomenon occurring in the case where a water film is formed between the restraining rolls 4a and the metal sheet S.
| Number | Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-118518 | Jul 2021 | JP | national |
| Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| PCT/JP2022/019933 | 5/11/2022 | WO |
