This disclosure relates to the technical field of secure data processing. More specifically, this disclosure relates to systems and methods for query processing with adaptive risk decisioning.
With development of computer technologies, sensitive data, such as financial information and medical records can be kept on remote servers or cloud-based computing resources. Authorized users can access the sensitive data through applications running, for example, on their personal computing devices. Typically, personal computing devices are connected, via data networks, to servers or cloud-based computing resources. Therefore, messages sent over the data network can be subject to unauthorized access during the transmission as well as during processing on the remote servers or cloud-based computing resources.
Encryption techniques, such as homomorphic encryption, can be applied to the sensitive data and messages to prevent unauthorized access during the transmission over a network and processing in the data environment. Encryption and decryption may include specific algebraic operations performed on plaintext and/or ciphertext representing queries, data in data sources, and on responses to the queries. Performing the encryption and decryption may require additional time and computing resources of servers. The additional time may cause delays in processing of queries by the servers. Additionally, processing of queries may require accessing data from various data sources with different levels of security.
This summary is provided to introduce a selection of concepts in a simplified form that are further described in the Detailed Description below. This summary is not intended to identify key features or essential features of the claimed subject matter, nor is it intended to be used as an aid in determining the scope of the claimed subject matter.
Generally, the present disclosure is directed to the technology for secure data processing. Some embodiments of the present disclosure may facilitate processing queries requiring access to data from multiple data sources with different levels of security.
According to one example embodiment of the present disclosure, a method for query processing with adaptive risk decisioning is provided. An example method may include receiving a query by a client. The client can be in communication with a plurality of servers. The method may further include analyzing, by the client, the query to determine at least one server configured to provide data of at least one data source of a plurality of data sources, wherein the data are associated with a portion of the query. The server can be selected from the plurality of servers. The method may further include acquiring, by the client and/or the server, a security profile of the data source. The method may further include generating, by the client and based on the security profile, at least one subquery for the server. The method may further include sending the subquery to the server, wherein the server is configured to process, based on the security profile, the subquery over the data of the data source to obtain a result for the subquery. The method may further include generating, by the client and based on the result of the subquery, a result for the query.
The query may include plaintext. The method may further include storing profiles of the plurality of data sources, by the client and/or the server, to a database of security profiles. The method may further include providing, by the at least one client, a user interface to configure the security profiles of the plurality of data sources. The generating of the subquery based on the security profile may include keeping the subquery unencrypted. The server can be configured to execute the unencrypted subquery over unencrypted data.
In some example embodiments, the subquery can be encrypted, by the client, based on an encryption scheme to generate an encrypted subquery. The server can be configured to execute the encrypted subquery over unencrypted data. In other example embodiments, the subquery may be encrypted, by the client, with an encryption scheme to generate an encrypted subquery. The server can be configured to execute the encrypted subquery over encrypted data. The encryption scheme may include a homomorphic encryption.
The subquery may be encrypted, by the client, using an encryption scheme to generate an encrypted subquery. The server can be configured to decrypt, in a Trusted Execution Environment (TEE) and based on the encryption scheme, the encrypted subquery to obtain an unencrypted subquery. The server may further execute, in the TEE, the unencrypted subquery over unencrypted data to obtain an unencrypted result. The server may further encrypt, in the TEE and based on the encryption scheme, the unencrypted result to obtain an encrypted result of the subquery. The server may further send the encrypted result of the subquery to the client. The client can decrypt, based on the encryption scheme, the encrypted result of the subquery to obtain the result of the subquery
The subquery may be encrypted, by the client, using an encryption scheme to generate an encrypted subquery. The server may be configured to decrypt, in the TEE and based on the encryption scheme, the encrypted subquery to obtain an unencrypted subquery and execute, in the TEE, the unencrypted subquery over encrypted data to obtain an encrypted result. The server may further encrypt, in the TEE and based on the encryption scheme, the encrypted result to obtain a doubly-encrypted result. The sever may further send the doubly-encrypted result to the client. The client may decrypt the doubly-encrypted result to obtain the result of the subquery.
According to one example embodiment of the present disclosure, a system for query processing with adaptive risk decisioning is provided. The system may include at least one processor and a memory storing processor-executable codes, wherein the at least one processor can be configured to implement the operations of the above-mentioned method for query processing with adaptive risk decisioning.
According to yet another example embodiment of the present disclosure, the operations of the above-mentioned method for query processing with adaptive risk decisioning are stored on a machine-readable medium comprising instructions, which when implemented by one or more processors perform the recited operations.
Other example embodiments of the disclosure and aspects will become apparent from the following description taken in conjunction with the following drawings.
Exemplary embodiments are illustrated by way of example and not limitation in the figures of the accompanying drawings, in which like references indicate similar elements.
The technology disclosed herein is concerned with methods and systems for query processing. Embodiments of the present disclosure may facilitate processing queries requiring reading data from multiple data sources with different levels of protections.
According to some embodiments of the present disclosure, a system for query processing with adaptive risk decisioning is provided. The system may allow a user to submit a query in a plaintext format. The query may involve data from a plurality of data sources. The system may analyze the query to determine search terms corresponding to the data sources and determine risk levels of accessing data from the data sources. The system may further generate, based on the query, subqueries to be run against each of the data sources with different level of protection for each data source.
Depending on the levels of protection, a subquery can be unencrypted and run against unencrypted data of a data source, the subquery can be encrypted and can be run against unencrypted data of the data source, or the subquery can be encrypted and run against encrypted data of the data source. Additionally, the encrypted subquery can be decrypted in a TEE and run against either unencrypted data or encrypted data of the data source.
The system may further combine results from the subqueries to generate the result of the original query. The result can be presented to the user in a plaintext format. The system may include a user interface to allow the user monitoring results of parsing of the query into subqueries and results of processing the subqueries. Results can be presented as several database tables containing unencrypted data.
According to one example embodiment of the present disclosure, a method for query processing with adaptive risk decisioning may commence with receiving a query by a client in communication with a plurality of servers. The method may further include analyzing, by the client, the query to determine at least one server configured to provide data associated with a portion of the query. The server can be selected from the plurality of servers. The method may also include acquiring, by the client and the server, a security profile of the data source. The method may also include generating, by the client and based on the query, at least one subquery for the data source. The method may include sending, by the client, the subquery to the server. The server can be configured to process, based on the security profile, the subquery over the data to obtain a result for the subquery. The method may further include generating, by the client and based on the result for the subquery, a result for the query.
Referring now to the drawings, various embodiments are described in which like reference numerals represent like parts and assemblies throughout the several views. It should be noted that the reference to various embodiments does not limit the scope of the claims attached hereto. Additionally, any examples outlined in this specification are not intended to be limiting and merely set forth some of the many possible embodiments for the appended claims.
As shown in
In various embodiments, the servers 110 may include a standalone server or cloud-based computing resource(s). The cloud-based computing resource(s) can include hardware and software available at a remote location and accessible over a network (for example, the Internet). The cloud-based computing resource(s) can be dynamically re-allocated based on demand. The cloud-based computing resources may include one or more server farms/clusters including a collection of computer servers which can be co-located with network switches and/or routers.
In some example embodiments, the client 105 may include a system 120 for processing queries. The system 120 can be configured to acquire queries. The queries can be either entered by a user of the client 105 or received from another application running on the client 105 or a computer device in communication with the client. The system 120 may further process the queries to generate subqueries. Each subquery can be further sent to one of the servers 110 configured to provide data from one or more data source from the data sources 115. The servers 110 may further process the subqueries using the data sources 115 to obtain results of the subqueries and send the results of subqueries to the client 105. The system 120 may further generate results of the queries based on the results of the subqueries.
In various embodiments, the data sources 115 may include one or more servers or cloud-based computing resource(s) configured to store data. The data sources 115 can be connected to the server 110 via one or more wired or wireless communications networks. The servers 110 can be configured to read the data from the data sources 115 to process subqueries received from the client 105. In some embodiments, the servers 110 can be also configured to store the data from the data sources 115.
The data associated with the data sources 115 may include plaintext data, deterministically encrypted data, semantically encrypted data, or a combination of thereof. The data associated with the data sources 115 can be encrypted or unencrypted based on the sensitivity of the data. For example, a first data source of the data sources 115 may include personal information of clients and should be kept encrypted. A second data source of the data sources 115 may include information concerning transactions carried out by the clients and may be kept unencrypted. A third data source from the data source 115 may include financial information of clients, such as credit cards and/or bank account data, which should be encrypted.
The data in some data sources 115 and corresponding subqueries can be encrypted using a homomorphic encryption (HE) based scheme. A homomorphic encryption is a form of encryption in which a specific algebraic operation (addition or multiplication) performed on plaintext, is equivalent to another operation performed on ciphertext. For example, in Partially Homomorphic Encryption (PHE) schemes, multiplication in ciphertext is equal to addition of the same values in plaintext.
For example, the homomorphic encryption scheme may include a Pallier cryptosystem. A subquery can be encrypted, by the client 105, with a public (encryption) key of the Pallier cryptosystem. The subquery and the public key can be sent to the server(s) 110 or data source 115. The encrypted subquery can be only decrypted with a private (decryption) key of the Pallier cryptosystem. The decryption key can be kept on the client and never provided to the server 110 or the data source 115.
To protect the content of the results of the subquery, the data of the data source 115 can be encrypted using the same homomorphic encryption scheme and public key received from the client 105. The server 110 can be further configured to perform the encrypted subquery on the encrypted data source and, thereby, obtain encrypted result of the subquery. The encrypted result can be sent to the client 105. The client 105 can decrypt the encrypted result using the private key. Because the private key is always kept on the client 105, neither encrypted subquery nor encrypted result of the subquery can be decrypted on the server 110 and/or data source 115 or when intercepted while in transition between the server 110 and the data source 115.
The user interface module 205 may be configured to allow a user to specify a query to be performed on one or more data sources 115. The query can be entered by the user in a plaintext format. The user interface module 205 can also display a result of processing of the query. The user interface module 205 can also allow an authorized user (an administrator) to configure parameters of security profiles for processing subqueries for the data sources 115. The database 210 can be configured to store the security profiles for processing subqueries for the servers 110 and data sources 115. The security profiles may include security levels assigned to the servers 110 and the data sources 115. A security level may depend on the sensitivity of the data provided by servers 110 and the data sources 115. The security levels can indicate client 105 and servers 110 how to process the subqueries over the data in data sources 115.
According to security level 2, the subquery is encrypted by the client 105, using, an encryption scheme. The encryption scheme may include, for example, a HE-based scheme. The encrypted subquery can be further decrypted, by the server 110 and using the encryption scheme, in a Trusted Execution Environment (TEE) to be processed over data of the data source 115. The data of the data source 115 are unencrypted. The server 110 can process, in the TEE, the decrypted subquery over the unencrypted data of the data source 115 to obtain an unencrypted result for the subquery. The server 110 may further encrypt, in the TEE and using a public key of the encryption scheme, the unencrypted result of the subquery to obtain an encrypted result of subquery. The server 110 may further send the encrypted result of the subquery to the client 105. The client 105 may further decrypt, using a private key of the encryption scheme, the encrypted result of the subquery to obtain a decrypted result of the subquery.
According to security level 3, the subquery is encrypted by client 105, using a first encryption scheme. The first encryption scheme may include a first HE-based scheme. The encrypted subquery can be further decrypted, by the server 110 using the first encryption scheme, in the TEE and processed over data of the data source 115. The data of the data source 115 can be encrypted using a second encryption scheme. The second encryption scheme can be different from the first encryption scheme. The second encryption scheme can include a second HE-based scheme. The second HE-based scheme can be different from the first HE-based scheme. The server 110 can process the decrypted subquery over the encrypted data of the data source 115 to obtain an encrypted result for subquery. The encrypted result of the subquery is encrypted using the second encryption scheme. The server 110 may further encrypt, in the TEE and based on the first encryption scheme, the encrypted result of the subquery to obtain a doubly-encrypted result of the subquery. The server 110 may further send the doubly-encrypted result of the subquery to the client 105. The doubly-encrypted result can be decrypted only by the client 105. The doubly-encrypted result can be further decrypted, by the client 105, using a private key of the first encryption scheme to obtain an encrypted result of the subquery. The encrypted result of the subquery can be further decrypted, by the client 105, using a private key of the second encryption scheme.
According to security level 4, the subquery is encrypted by client 105, using an encryption scheme. The encryption scheme may include, for example, a homomorphic encryption (HE)-based scheme. The data in the data source 115 can be kept unencrypted. The encrypted subquery can be sent to the server 110 configured to read data from data source 115. The encrypted subquery can be never decrypted by the server 110 or the data source 115. The data of the data source 115 can remain unencrypted. The server 110 can process the encrypted subquery over unencrypted data of data source 115 to obtain an encrypted result for the subquery and send the encrypted result for the subquery to the client 105. The encrypted result is decrypted with the public key of the encryption scheme used by the client 105 to encrypt the subquery. The encrypted result of the subquery can be decrypted only by the client 105 using a private key of the encryption scheme.
According to security level 5, the subquery can be encrypted, using a first encryption scheme. The first encryption scheme may include, for example, a first HE-based scheme. The data in the data source 115 can be encrypted using a second encryption scheme. The second encryption scheme can be different from the first encryption scheme. The second encryption scheme may include a second HE-based scheme which is different from the first HE-based scheme. The encrypted subquery can be sent to the server 110 configured to read data from the data source 115. The data are encrypted with a public key of the second encryption scheme. The server 110 may further process the encrypted subquery over the encrypted data of the data source 115 to obtain a doubly-encrypted result for subquery. The server 110 may further send the doubly-encrypted result of the subquery to the client 105. The doubly-encrypted result can be decrypted by the client 105 only. The doubly-encrypted result can be further decrypted, by the client 105, using a private key of the first encryption scheme to obtain an encrypted result of the subquery. The encrypted result of the subquery can be further decrypted, by the client 105, using a private key of the second encryption scheme.
Referring back to
The subquery processing module 220 can be configured to process subqueries over the data sources 115. The subquery processing module 220 can further encrypt, based on the security profiles, the subqueries required to be encrypted prior to being submitted to the servers 110. The servers 110 can be pre-configured to process the subqueries according to one of the security levels and send the results of subqueries to the client 105. The subquery processing module 220 can further decrypt the results of the subqueries required to be decrypted based on the security profiles stored in database 210.
The response generation module 225 can be configured to generate, based on results of subqueries, a result for the query. The result for the query can be displayed in a plaintext format by the user interface module 205.
An authorized user of a client device 105 may submit a query to the system 120 to find previous transactions (e.g., for the last 10 days) that were performed by and all credit card numbers used for the transactions by a client named John Doe. The system 120 may analyze the query and determine that three subqueries need to be sent to three data sources. The first data source can be configured to store personal information, for example names and addresses of clients performing the transactions and client codes. The second data source can be configured to store information concerning transactions and codes of clients. The third data source can be configured to store information concerning credit cards used for the transactions and the number of transactions.
The system 120 may generate a first subquery to retrieve the code of the client from the first data source. The first data source containing the personal information of the clients can be assigned a security profile with the security level 3. The system 120 may encrypt the first subquery, send the first subquery to a first server configured to read data of the first data source, and receive, from the first server, results of the subquery in an encrypted format. The results may include a client code.
The system 120 can generate a second subquery to retrieve transaction numbers from the second data source. The second data source can be assigned a security profile with the security level 1. According to the security level 1, the system 120 may sent unencrypted subquery to a second server configured to read data of the second data source and receive, from the second server, results of the subquery in a plaintext format. The results may include numbers of transactions.
The system 120 can further generate a third subquery to retrieve credit card information from the third data source. The third data source can be assigned a security profile with the security level 5. According to the security level 5, the system 120 may send an encrypted subquery to a third server configured to read data from the third data source and receive, from the third server, an encrypted result of the subquery. The system 120 may further decrypt the encrypted result. The system 120 can further combine the results of the first subquery, second subquery, and third subquery to generate results for the original query in a plaintext format.
In block 405, the method 400 may commence with receiving a query by a client in communication with a plurality of servers. The servers can be in communication with a plurality of the data sources and configured to read data from the data sources. The query may include plaintext. In block 410, the method 400 may analyze, by the client, the query to determine at least one server from the plurality of the servers configured to provide data associated with a portion of the query. The server may read the data from a data source of a plurality of data sources. In block 415, the method 400 may acquire, by the client, a security profile of the data source. The security profile may include a security level for processing queries by the servers from the plurality of servers.
In block 420, the method 400 may generate, by the client and based on the security profile, at least one subquery for the server. In block 425, the method 400 may send the subquery to the server. The server can be configured to process, based on the security profile, the subquery over data to obtain results for the at least one subquery.
Based on the security profile, the subquery may be kept unencrypted and the server can execute the subquery over unencrypted data. Based on another security profile, the client may encrypt the subquery to generate an encrypted subquery and the server may execute the encrypted subquery over unencrypted data. Based on yet another security profile, the client may encrypt the subquery to generate an encrypted subquery and the server may execute the encrypted subquery over encrypted data.
Based on a further security profile, the client can encrypt the subquery to generate an encrypted subquery. The server can decrypt, in the TEE, the encrypted subquery and execute, in the TEE, the subquery over unencrypted data. According to yet another security profile, the client can encrypt the subquery to generate an encrypted subquery. The server can decrypt, in the TEE, the encrypted subquery and execute, in the TEE, the subquery over encrypted data. In block 430, the method 400 may conclude with generating, based on the results for the subquery, a result for the query.
The components shown in
Mass data storage 530, which can be implemented with a magnetic disk drive, solid state drive, or an optical disk drive, is a non-volatile storage device for storing data and instructions for use by processor unit 510. Mass data storage 530 stores the system software for implementing embodiments of the present disclosure for purposes of loading that software into main memory 520.
Portable storage device 540 operates in conjunction with a portable non-volatile storage medium, such as a flash drive, floppy disk, compact disk, digital video disc, or Universal Serial Bus (USB) storage device, to input and output data and code to and from the computer system 500 of
User input devices 560 can provide a portion of a user interface. User input devices 560 may include one or more microphones, an alphanumeric keypad, such as a keyboard, for inputting alphanumeric and other information, or a pointing device, such as a mouse, a trackball, stylus, or cursor direction keys. User input devices 560 can also include a touchscreen. Additionally, the computer system 500 as shown in
Graphics display system 570 include a liquid crystal display (LCD) or other suitable display device. Graphics display system 570 is configurable to receive textual and graphical information and processes the information for output to the display device.
Peripheral devices 580 may include any type of computer support device to add additional functionality to the computer system.
The components provided in the computer system 500 of
The processing for various embodiments may be implemented in software that is cloud-based. In some embodiments, the computer system 500 is implemented as a cloud-based computing environment, such as a virtual machine operating within a computing cloud. In other embodiments, the computer system 500 may itself include a cloud-based computing environment, where the functionalities of the computer system 500 are executed in a distributed fashion. Thus, the computer system 500, when configured as a computing cloud, may include pluralities of computing devices in various forms, as will be described in greater detail below.
In general, a cloud-based computing environment is a resource that typically combines the computational power of a large grouping of processors (such as within web servers) and/or that combines the storage capacity of a large grouping of computer memories or storage devices. Systems that provide cloud-based resources may be utilized exclusively by their owners or such systems may be accessible to outside users who deploy applications within the computing infrastructure to obtain the benefit of large computational or storage resources.
The cloud may be formed, for example, by a network of web servers that comprise a plurality of computing devices, such as the computer system 500, with each server (or at least a plurality thereof) providing processor and/or storage resources. These servers may manage workloads provided by multiple users (e.g., cloud resource customers or other users). Typically, each user places workload demands upon the cloud that vary in real-time, sometimes dramatically. The nature and extent of these variations typically depends on the type of business associated with the user.
The present technology is described above with reference to example embodiments. Therefore, other variations upon the example embodiments are intended to be covered by the present disclosure.
This application is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/875,914, filed Jan. 19, 2018, which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 62/448,890, filed Jan. 20, 2017; U.S. Provisional Application No. 62/448,918, filed on Jan. 20, 2017; U.S. Provisional Application No. 62/448,893, filed on Jan. 20, 2017; U.S. Provisional Application No. 62/448,906, filed on Jan. 20, 2017; U.S. Provisional Application No. 62/448,908, filed on Jan. 20, 2017; U.S. Provisional Application No. 62/448,913, filed on Jan. 20, 2017; U.S. Provisional Application No. 62/448,916, filed on Jan. 20, 2017; U.S. Provisional Application No. 62/448,883, filed on Jan. 20, 2017; U.S. Provisional Application No. 62/448,885, filed on Jan. 20, 2017; U.S. Provisional Application No. 62/448,902, filed on Jan. 20, 2017; U.S. Provisional Application No. 62/448,896, filed on Jan. 20, 2017; U.S. Provisional Application No. 62/448,899, filed on Jan. 20, 2017; and U.S. Provisional Application No. 62/462,818, filed on Feb. 23, 2017, the disclosures of which are hereby incorporated by reference for all purposes.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5732390 | Katayanagi et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
6178435 | Schmookler | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6745220 | Hars | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6748412 | Ruehle | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6910059 | Lu et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
7712143 | Comlekoglu | May 2010 | B2 |
7849185 | Rockwood | Dec 2010 | B1 |
7870398 | Perng | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7937270 | Smaragdis et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
8515058 | Gentry | Aug 2013 | B1 |
8565435 | Gentry et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8781967 | Tehranchi et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8832465 | Gulati et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
9059855 | Johnson et al. | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9094378 | Yung et al. | Jul 2015 | B1 |
9189411 | Mckeen et al. | Nov 2015 | B2 |
9215219 | Krendelev et al. | Dec 2015 | B1 |
9288039 | Monet et al. | Mar 2016 | B1 |
9491111 | Roth et al. | Nov 2016 | B1 |
9503432 | El Emam et al. | Nov 2016 | B2 |
9514317 | Martin et al. | Dec 2016 | B2 |
9565020 | Camenisch et al. | Feb 2017 | B1 |
9577829 | Roth et al. | Feb 2017 | B1 |
9652609 | Kang et al. | May 2017 | B2 |
9846787 | Johnson et al. | Dec 2017 | B2 |
9852306 | Cash et al. | Dec 2017 | B2 |
9942032 | Kornaropoulos et al. | Apr 2018 | B1 |
9946810 | Trepetin et al. | Apr 2018 | B1 |
9973334 | Hibshoosh et al. | May 2018 | B2 |
10027486 | Liu | Jul 2018 | B2 |
10055602 | Deshpande et al. | Aug 2018 | B2 |
10073981 | Arasu et al. | Sep 2018 | B2 |
10075288 | Khedr et al. | Sep 2018 | B1 |
10120893 | Rocamora et al. | Nov 2018 | B1 |
10129028 | Kamakari et al. | Nov 2018 | B2 |
10148438 | Evancich et al. | Dec 2018 | B2 |
10181049 | El Defrawy et al. | Jan 2019 | B1 |
10210266 | Antonopoulos et al. | Feb 2019 | B2 |
10235539 | Ito et al. | Mar 2019 | B2 |
10255454 | Kamara et al. | Apr 2019 | B2 |
10333715 | Chu et al. | Jun 2019 | B2 |
10375042 | Chaum | Aug 2019 | B2 |
10396984 | French et al. | Aug 2019 | B2 |
10423806 | Cerezo Sanchez | Sep 2019 | B2 |
10489604 | Yoshino et al. | Nov 2019 | B2 |
10496631 | Tschudin et al. | Dec 2019 | B2 |
10644876 | Williams et al. | May 2020 | B2 |
10693627 | Carr | Jun 2020 | B2 |
10721057 | Carr | Jul 2020 | B2 |
10728018 | Williams et al. | Jul 2020 | B2 |
10771237 | Williams et al. | Sep 2020 | B2 |
10790960 | Williams et al. | Sep 2020 | B2 |
10817262 | Carr et al. | Oct 2020 | B2 |
10873568 | Williams | Dec 2020 | B2 |
10880275 | Williams | Dec 2020 | B2 |
10902133 | Williams et al. | Jan 2021 | B2 |
10903976 | Williams et al. | Jan 2021 | B2 |
10972251 | Carr | Apr 2021 | B2 |
11196540 | Williams et al. | Dec 2021 | B2 |
11196541 | Williams et al. | Dec 2021 | B2 |
11290252 | Carr | Mar 2022 | B2 |
11451370 | Williams et al. | Sep 2022 | |
20020032712 | Miyasaka et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020073316 | Collins et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020104002 | Nishizawa et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20030037087 | Rarick | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030059041 | MacKenzie et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030110388 | Pavlin et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20040167952 | Gueron et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20050008152 | MacKenzie | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050076024 | Takatsuka et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050259817 | Ramzan et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20060008080 | Higashi et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060008081 | Higashi et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20070053507 | Smaragdis et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070095909 | Chaum | May 2007 | A1 |
20070140479 | Wang et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070143280 | Wang et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20090037504 | Hussain | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090083546 | Staddon et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090193033 | Ramzan et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090268908 | Bikel et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090279694 | Takahashi et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090287837 | Felsher | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20100202606 | Almeida | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100205430 | Chiou et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100241595 | Felsher | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20110026781 | Osadchy et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110107105 | Hada | May 2011 | A1 |
20110110525 | Gentry | May 2011 | A1 |
20110243320 | Halevi et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110283099 | Nath et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20120039469 | Mueller et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120054485 | Tanaka et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120066510 | Weinman | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120201378 | Nabeel et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120265794 | Niel | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120265797 | Niel | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20130010950 | Kerschbaum | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130051551 | El Aimani | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130054665 | Felch | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130114811 | Boufounos et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130148868 | Troncoso Pastoriza et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130170640 | Gentry | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130191650 | Balakrishnan | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130195267 | Alessio et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130198526 | Goto | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130216044 | Gentry et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130230168 | Takenouchi | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130237242 | Oka et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130246813 | Mori et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130326224 | Yavuz | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20130339722 | Krendelev et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20130339751 | Sun et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20130346741 | Kim et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20130346755 | Nguyen et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140164758 | Ramamurthy et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140189811 | Taylor et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140233727 | Rohloff et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140281511 | Kaushik et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140355756 | Iwamura et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20150100785 | Joye et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150100794 | Joye et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150205967 | Naedele et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150215123 | Kipnis et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150227930 | Quigley et al. | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150229480 | Joye et al. | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150244517 | Nita | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150248458 | Sakamoto | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20150304736 | Lal et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150358152 | Ikarashi et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20150358153 | Gentry | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20160004874 | Ioannidis et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160036826 | Pogorelik et al. | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160072623 | Joye et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160105402 | Kupwade-Patil et al. | Apr 2016 | A1 |
20160105414 | Bringer et al. | Apr 2016 | A1 |
20160119346 | Chen et al. | Apr 2016 | A1 |
20160140348 | Nawaz et al. | May 2016 | A1 |
20160179945 | Lastra Diaz et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160182222 | Rane et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160323098 | Bathen | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20160335450 | Yoshino et al. | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20160344557 | Chabanne et al. | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20160350648 | Gilad-Bachrach et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20170070340 | Hibshoosh et al. | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170070351 | Yan | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170099133 | Gu et al. | Apr 2017 | A1 |
20170134158 | Pasol et al. | May 2017 | A1 |
20170185776 | Robinson et al. | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20170264426 | Joye et al. | Sep 2017 | A1 |
20170366562 | Zhang et al. | Dec 2017 | A1 |
20180091466 | Friedman et al. | Mar 2018 | A1 |
20180139054 | Chu et al. | May 2018 | A1 |
20180198601 | Laine et al. | Jul 2018 | A1 |
20180204284 | Cerezo Sanchez | Jul 2018 | A1 |
20180212751 | Williams et al. | Jul 2018 | A1 |
20180212752 | Williams et al. | Jul 2018 | A1 |
20180212753 | Williams | Jul 2018 | A1 |
20180212754 | Williams et al. | Jul 2018 | A1 |
20180212755 | Williams et al. | Jul 2018 | A1 |
20180212756 | Carr | Jul 2018 | A1 |
20180212757 | Carr | Jul 2018 | A1 |
20180212758 | Williams et al. | Jul 2018 | A1 |
20180212759 | Williams et al. | Jul 2018 | A1 |
20180212775 | Williams | Jul 2018 | A1 |
20180212933 | Williams | Jul 2018 | A1 |
20180224882 | Carr | Aug 2018 | A1 |
20180234254 | Camenisch et al. | Aug 2018 | A1 |
20180267981 | Sirdey et al. | Sep 2018 | A1 |
20180270046 | Carr | Sep 2018 | A1 |
20180276417 | Cerezo Sanchez | Sep 2018 | A1 |
20180343109 | Koseki et al. | Nov 2018 | A1 |
20180349632 | Bent et al. | Dec 2018 | A1 |
20180359097 | Lindell | Dec 2018 | A1 |
20180373882 | Veugen | Dec 2018 | A1 |
20190013950 | Becker et al. | Jan 2019 | A1 |
20190108350 | Bohli et al. | Apr 2019 | A1 |
20190158272 | Chopra et al. | May 2019 | A1 |
20190229887 | Ding et al. | Jul 2019 | A1 |
20190238311 | Zheng | Aug 2019 | A1 |
20190251553 | Ma et al. | Aug 2019 | A1 |
20190251554 | Ma et al. | Aug 2019 | A1 |
20190253235 | Zhang et al. | Aug 2019 | A1 |
20190260585 | Kawai et al. | Aug 2019 | A1 |
20190266282 | Mitchell et al. | Aug 2019 | A1 |
20190280880 | Zhang et al. | Sep 2019 | A1 |
20190312728 | Poeppelmann | Oct 2019 | A1 |
20190327078 | Zhang et al. | Oct 2019 | A1 |
20190334716 | Kocsis et al. | Oct 2019 | A1 |
20190349191 | Soriente et al. | Nov 2019 | A1 |
20190371106 | Kaye | Dec 2019 | A1 |
20200134200 | Williams et al. | Apr 2020 | A1 |
20200150930 | Carr et al. | May 2020 | A1 |
20200204341 | Williams et al. | Jun 2020 | A1 |
20200382274 | Williams et al. | Dec 2020 | A1 |
20200396053 | Williams et al. | Dec 2020 | A1 |
20210034765 | Williams et al. | Feb 2021 | A1 |
20210105256 | Williams | Apr 2021 | A1 |
20210409191 | Williams et al. | Dec 2021 | A1 |
20220006629 | Williams et al. | Jan 2022 | A1 |
20220116200 | Carr | Apr 2022 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2887607 | Jun 2015 | EP |
2887607 | Jun 2015 | EP |
2873186 | Mar 2018 | EP |
5680007 | Mar 2015 | JP |
101386294 | Apr 2014 | KR |
WO2014105160 | Jul 2014 | WO |
WO2015094261 | Jun 2015 | WO |
WO2016003833 | Jan 2016 | WO |
WO2016018502 | Feb 2016 | WO |
WO2018091084 | May 2018 | WO |
WO2018136801 | Jul 2018 | WO |
WO2018136804 | Jul 2018 | WO |
WO2018136811 | Jul 2018 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Panda et al., “FPGA Prototype of Low Latency BBS PRNG,” IEEE International Symposium on Nanoelectronic and Information Systems, Dec. 2015, pp. 118-123, 7 pages. |
Sahu et al., “Implementation of Modular Multiplication for RSA Algorithm,” 2011 International Conference on Communication Systems and Network Technologies, 2011, pp. 112-114, 3 pages. |
Drucker et al., “Achieving trustworthy Homomorphic Encryption by combining it with a Trusted Execution Environment,” Journal of Wireless Mobile Networks, Ubiquitous Computing, and Dependable Application (JoWUA), Mar. 2018, pp. 86-99. |
Google Scholar, search results for “trusted execution environment database”, 2 pages, Aug. 1, 2020. |
PIRK Code Excerpt—QuerierDriver, https://github.com/apache/incubator-retired-pirk/blob/master/src/main/java/org/apache/pirk/querier/wideskies/QuerierDriver.java; Jul. 11, 2016; 5 pages. |
PIRK Code Excerpt—QuerierDriverCLI, https://github.com/apache/incubator-retired-pirk/blob/master/src/main/java/org/apache/pirk/querier/wideskies/QuerierCLI.java; Jul. 11, 2016; 9 pages. |
PIRK Code Excerpt—Query; [online]; Retreived from the Internet: <URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-retired-pirk/blob/master/src/main/java/org/apache/pirk/query/wideskies/Query.java>; Jul. 11, 2016; 7 pages. |
PIRK Code Excerpt—Queryinfo; [online]; Retreived from the Internet: <URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-retired-pirk/blob/master/src/main/java/org/apache/pirk/query/wideskies/QueryInfo.java>; Jul. 11, 2016; 4 pages. |
PIRK Code Excerpt—ComputeResponse; [online]; Retreived from the Internet: <URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-retired-pirk/blob/master/src/main/java/org/apache/pirk/responder/wideskies/spark/ComputeResponse.java> Jul. 11, 2016; 8 pages. |
PIRK Code Excerpt—HashSelectorsAndPartitionData; [online]; Retreived from the Internet: <URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-retired-pirk/blob/master/src/main/java/org/apache/pirk/responder/wideskies/spark/HashSelectorsAndPartitionData.java>; Jul. 11, 2016; 2 pages. |
PIRK Code Excerpt—HashSelectorsAndFormPartitionsBigInteger; [online]; Retreived from the Internet: <URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-retired-pirk/blob/master/src/main/java/org/apache/pirk/responder/wideskies/common/HashSelectorAndPartitionData.java>; Jul. 11, 2016; 3 pages. |
PIRK Code Excerpt—QueryUtils; [online]; Retreived from the Internet: <URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-retired-pirk/blob/master/src/main/java/org/apache/pirk/query/wideskies/QueryUtils.java>; Jul. 11, 2016; 8 pages. |
PIRK Code Excerpt—QuerySchema; [online]; Retreived from the Internet: <URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-retired-pirk/blob/master/src/main/java/org/apache/pirk/schema/query/QuerySchema.java>; Jul. 11, 2016; 3 pages. |
“PIRK Proposal” Apache.org [online], [retreived on Oct. 28, 20]; Retreived from the Internet: <URL:https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/incubator/PirkProposal>; Apr. 10, 2019; 5 pages. |
Bosch et al., “SOFIR: Securely Outsourced Forensic Recognition,” 2014 IEEE International Conference on Acoustic, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP), IEEE 978-1-4799-2893-4/14, 2014, pp. 2713-2717. |
Waziri et al., “Big Data Analytics and Data Security in the Cloud via Fullly Homomorphic Encryption,” World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology International Journal of Computer, Electrical, Automation, Control and Information Engineering, vol. 9, No. 3, 2015, pp. 744-753. |
Bajpai et al., “A Fully Homomorphic Encryption Implementation on Cloud Computing,” International Journal of Information & Computation Technology, ISSN 0974-2239 vol. 4, No. 8, 2014, pp. 811-816. |
Viejo et al., “Asymmetric homomorphisms for secure aggregation in heterogeneous scenarios,” Information Fusion 13, Elsevier B.V., Mar. 21, 2011, pp. 285-295. |
Patil et al, “Big Data Privacy Using Fully Homomorphic Non-Deterministic Encryption,” IEEE 7th International Advance Computing Conference, Jan. 5-7, 2017, 15 pages. |
Petition to Insitute Derivation Proceeding Pursuant to 35 USC 135; Case No. DER2019-00009, US Patent and Trademark Office Patent Trial and Appeal Board; Jul. 26, 2019, 272 pages. (2 PDFs). |
SCAMP Working Paper L29/11, “A Woods Hole Proposal Using Striping,” Dec. 2011, 14 pages. |
O'Hara, Michael James, “Shovel-ready Private Information Retrieval,” Dec. 2015, 4 pages. |
Carr, Benjamin et al., “Proposed Laughing Owl,” NSA Technical Report, Jan. 5, 2016, 18 pages. |
Williams, Ellison Anne et al., “Wideskies: Scalable Private Informaton Retrieval,” 14 pages. |
Carr, Benjamin et al., “A Private Stream Search Technique,” NSA Technical Report, Dec. 1, 2015, 18 pages. |
Drucker et al., “Paillier-encrypted databases with fast aggregated queries,” 2017 14th IEEE Annual Consumer Communications & Networking Conference (CCNC), Jan. 8-11, 2017, pp. 848-853. |
Tu et al., “Processing Analytical Queries over Encrypted Data,” Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment, vol. 6, Issue No. 5, Mar. 13, 2013. pp. 289-300. |
Boneh et al., “Private Database Queries Using Somewhat Homomorphic Encryption”, Cryptology ePrint Archive: Report 2013/422, Standford University [online], Jun. 27, 2013, [retrieved on Dec. 9, 2019], 22 pages. |
Chen et al., “Efficient Multi-Key Homomorphic Encryption with Packed Ciphertexts with Application to Oblivious Neural Network Inference”, CCS '19 Proceedings of the 2019 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security, May 19, 2019. pp. 395-412. |
Armknecht et al., “A Guide to Fully Homomorphic Encryption” IACR Cryptology ePrint Archive: Report 2015/1192 [online], Dec. 14, 2015, 35 pages. |
Bayar et al., “A Deep Learning Approach to Universal Image Manipulation Detection Using a New Convolutional Layer”, IH&MMSec 2016, Jun. 20-22, 2016. pp. 5-10. |
Juvekar et al. “Gazelle: A Low Latency Framework for Secure Neural Network Inference”, 27th USENIX Security Symposium, Aug. 15-17, 2018. pp. 1650-1668. |
“International Search Report” and “Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority,” Patent Cooperation Treaty Application No. PCT/US2018/014535, dated Apr. 19, 2018, 9 pages. |
“International Search Report” and “Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority,” Patent Cooperation Treaty Application No. PCT/US2018/014530, dated Apr. 23, 2018, 7 pages. |
“International Search Report” and “Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority,” Patent Cooperation Treaty Application No. PCT/US2018/014551, dated Apr. 24, 2018, 8 pages. |
Fan et al., “Somewhat Practical Fully Homomorphic Encryption”, IACR Cryptol. ePrintArch. 2012, 19 pages. |
“Microsoft Computer Dictionary”, pp. 276 and 529, Microsoft Press, 5th Edition, ISBN 0735614954,2002, (Year: 2002), 4 pages. |
“Homomorphic encryption”, Wikipedia, May 22, 2021, pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20190042786 A1 | Feb 2019 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62448890 | Jan 2017 | US | |
62448918 | Jan 2017 | US | |
62448893 | Jan 2017 | US | |
62448906 | Jan 2017 | US | |
62448908 | Jan 2017 | US | |
62448913 | Jan 2017 | US | |
62448916 | Jan 2017 | US | |
62448883 | Jan 2017 | US | |
62448885 | Jan 2017 | US | |
62448902 | Jan 2017 | US | |
62448896 | Jan 2017 | US | |
62448899 | Jan 2017 | US | |
62462818 | Feb 2017 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 15875914 | Jan 2018 | US |
Child | 16158230 | US |