Quinoline carboxylic acid derivative

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 4429127
  • Patent Number
    4,429,127
  • Date Filed
    Wednesday, February 17, 1982
    42 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, January 31, 1984
    40 years ago
Abstract
This invention relates to a new compound of value as antibacterial agent. More particularly, it relates to a quinoline carboxylic acid derivative and the acid addition salts thereof.
Description

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
This invention relates to a new and useful quinoline carboxylic acid derivative having a potent antibacterial activity.
Antibacterial agents such as nalidixic acid, piromidic acid and pipemidic acid have been proved highly effective in the therapy of infections due to gram-negative bacteria, but such agents suffer the serious disadvantage of having only weak activities against most gram-positive bacteria. The compound of the present invention is particularly useful in that it possesses potent antibacterial activities against both gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria.
The new compound of the present invention is a quinoline carboxylic acid derivative having the formula (I) ##STR1## and the pharmaceutically acceptable salts thereof. The compound (I) is highly effective in the therapy of infections due to gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria and it has been found that the compound (I) is fortunately metabolized in part to 1-ethyl-6,8-difluoro-1,4-dihydro-4-oxo-7-(1-piperazinyl)quinoline-3-carboxylic acid having superior activity against gram-negative bacteria when administered to animals.
The compound (I) can be prepared by the reduction of a compound of the formula (II) ##STR2## wherein R.sup.1 is hydrogen or lower alkyl group, if necessary, followed by hydrolysis by the usual method. The reduction was accomplished by catalytic hydrogenation using palladium on charcoal, Ranney-nickel, platinum oxide, or the like as catalyst in an inert solvent such as, for example, alcohols, ethers, or organic acids, or by the reaction with metal such as, for example, iron, tin or zink, or the halide or the sulfate in the presence of acid such as, for example, hydrochloric acid, sulfuric acid, or acetic acid.
Also, the compound (I) was obtained by the amination of a compound of the formula (III), ##STR3## wherein R.sup.1 is the same as mentioned above and X is a releasing group such as halogen or sulfonyloxy group, with a piperazine derivative of the formula (IV), ##STR4## wherein R.sup.2 and R.sup.3 are hydrogen or protecting group such as acyl group, in an inert solvent such as, for example, water, alcohols, ethers, amines, nitriles, dimethylformamide or dimethylsulfoxide, preferably in the presence of an organic or inorganic base, at a temperature in the range of room temperature to 170.degree. C., if desired, followed by hydrolysis with acids or alkalis by the usual method.
Starting material (II) was obtained by the reaction of a compound (III) with N-(p-nitrobenzyl)piperazine or by the treatment of a compound of the formula (V), ##STR5## wherein R.sup.1 is the same as mentioned above, with a compound of the formula (VI), ##STR6## wherein X' is halogen,
The salts such as, for example, methanesulfonate, benzenesulfonate, acetate, maleate, citrate, malate, lactate, hydrochloride, sulfate, phosphate, sodium salt, potassium salt and amine salts, or the like, of the compound (I) are obtained by the usual manner.
The compound (I) or the salt is administered to human or animals, generally in the range of 1-100 mg/kg/day by an oral or parenteral route. The compound (I) or the salt may be used in the form of pharmaceutical preparations such as, for example, tablets, capsules, sirups, injections, granules, powder, suppositories, or emulsions. The pharmaceutical preparations may contain the compound in admixture with an adjuvant and are formed by conventional methods.





The following examples serve to illustrate the invention.
EXAMPLE 1
A mixture of 1-ethyl-6,8-difluoro-1,4-dihydro-4-oxo-7-(1-piperazinyl)quinoline-3-carboxylic acid hydrochloride (6.7 g), triethylamine (5.45 g), p-nitrobenzylbromide (5.8 g) and dimethylformamide (200 ml) was stirred at 90.degree. C. for 10.5 hrs. The solvent was evaporated off and the residue was treated with water. The solid was filtered, washed with water, dried, and recrystallized from a mixture of dimethylformamide and ethanol to give 6.9 g of 1-ethyl-6,8-difluoro-1,4-dihydro-7-[4-(p-nitrobenzyl)-1-piperazinyl]-4-oxoquinoline-3-carboxylic acid. mp: 241.degree.-242.degree. C.
______________________________________ C H N______________________________________Anal. Calcd. for C.sub.23 H.sub.22 F.sub.2 N.sub.4 O.sub.5 58.47 4.69 11.86Found 58.50 4.59 11.95______________________________________
EXAMPLE 2
A mixture of 1-ethyl-6,8-difluoro-1,4-dihydro-7-[4-(p-nitrobenzyl)-1-piperazinyl]-4-oxoquinoline-3-carboxylic acid (6.0 g), acetic acid (150 ml), and 5% palladium on charcoal (1.0 g) was hydrogenated. The slurry was filtered and the filtrate concentrated to dryness. The residue was treated with water, neutralized with aqueous sodium hydroxide solution and extracted with dichloromethane. The organic layer was dried and evaporated. The residue was chromatographed on silica gel. Elution with a mixture of chloroform and ethanol (20:1) and recrystallization from a mixture of chloroform and ethanol gave 7-[4-(p-aminobenzyl)-1-piperazinyl]-1-ethyl-6,8-difluoro-1,4-dihydro-4-oxoquinoline-3-carboxylic acid.
mp: 220.degree.-221.degree. C.
______________________________________ C H N______________________________________Anal. Calcd. for C.sub.23 H.sub.24 F.sub.2 N.sub.4 O.sub.3 62.43 5.47 12.66Found 62.53 5.36 12.68______________________________________
EXPERIMENT 1
Antibacterial activity (in vitro)
The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of the compound (I) was determined by an agar dilution technique (the standard method of Japan Society of Chemotherapy) against standard strains of gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria.
As shown in Table 1, nalidixic acid and pipemidic acid exerted antibacterial activity mainly on gram-negative bacteria, and were inactive on many strains of gram-positive bacteria.
On the other hand, the compound (I) was more active than nalidixic acid and pipemidic acid against both of gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria. Expecially the antibacterial activity of the compound (I) was more potent against gram-positive bacteria containing Streptococcus spp. which were not susceptible to nalidixic acid and pipemidic acid.
EXPERIMENT 2
Antibacterial activity (in vivo)
The in vivo antibacterial activity of the compound (I) was determined in systemic infection in mice. The systemic infections were produced in male mice ICR (body weight, 19.+-.2 g) by inoculating intraperitoneally with Staphylococcus aureus Smith and E. coli ML4707. The compounds were administered orally in divided doses at 0 and 4 hrs. after infection. The therapeutic effect of drugs was judged from the number of mice surviving after 7 days of observation. A comparison of in vivo antibacterial activity was made on the basis of the mean effective dose (ED.sub.50) calculated by the method of Litchfield and Wilcoxon.
As shown in Table 2, the in vivo antibacterial activity of the compound (I) was significantly more effective than that of nalidixic acid and pipemidic acid against S. sureus Smith. The potency of the compound (I) was superior 172 times than that of nalidixic acid, and 62 times than that of pipemidic acid.
EXPERIMENT 3
Tissue levels of the compound (I) after a single oral administration of 50 mg/kg in mice and rats
Tissue levels of the compound (I) were determined by micro-biological assay which employed the thin layer cup method with Bacillus subtilis ATCC6633 as the test organism. Serum and tissue levels of the compound (I) were calculated with the standard curve prepared in normal serum of the test animal species and M/15 phosphate buffer (pH 7.5), respectively. The results were shown in Table 3. After the single oral administration of 50 mg/kg of the compound (I) in mice and rats, a peak serum level was reached at 8.6 and 5.3 .mu.g/ml, respectively, within 30-60 minutes. The level of the compound (I) in lung, liver and kidney were higher than those in serum with both species. The transferability of the compound (I) in tissues was very excellent.
EXPERIMENT 4
Acute toxicity of the compound (I)
Acute toxicity of the compound (I) was examined in mice (ICR strain, 7 weeks old). Observation period was 7 days after a single oral and intravenous administration.
As shown in Table 4, the compound (I) has a low toxicity.
TABLE 1__________________________________________________________________________In vitro antibacterial activity of the present compound MIC (.mu.g/ml) PresentOrganism Gram compound Metabolite* NA** PPA***__________________________________________________________________________Bacillus subtilis PCI 219 + 0.1 0.2 6.25 6.25Staphylococcus aureus 209P + 0.1 0.78 100 25S. aureus IID670 (Terajima) + 0.2 0.78 >100 25S. epidermidis IID866 + 0.2 0.78Streptococcus pyogenes IID692 + 0.78 3.13 >100 >100S. pyogenes S-8 + 0.78 12.5 >100 >100S. pneumoniae IID552 + 0.39 6.25 >100 >100S. faecalis IID682 + 0.78 3.13 >100 >100E. coli NIHJ JC-2 - 0.20 0.05 3.13 1.56E. coli ATCC10536 - 0.39 0.05 3.13 1.56Haemophilus influenzae IID986 - 0.20 0.025 1.56 3.13Klebsiella pneumoniae IFO3512 - 0.1 0.05 1.56 1.56Proteus vulgaris IFO3167 - 1.56 0.05 3.13 3.13P. mirabilis IID994 - 1.56 0.05P. morganii IID602 - 1.56 0.1Enterobacter cloacae IID977 - 1.56 0.1Citrobacter freundii IID976 - 1.56 0.1Shigella sonnei IID969 - 0.39 0.05 1.56 1.56Salmonella enteritidis IID604 - 1.56 0.1 12.5 12.5Yersinia enterocolitica IID981 - 1.56 0.1Serratia marcescens IID618 - 3.13 0.1Pseudomonas aeruginosa V-1 - 12.5 0.78 100 12.5P. aeruginosa IFO12689 - 25 1.56 >100 25Acinetobacter enitratus IID876 - 0.78 0.78Alcaligenes faecalis 0104002 - 3.13 0.78__________________________________________________________________________ Inoculum size: 10.sup.8 cells/ml *1Ethyl-6,8-difluoro-1,4-dihydro-4-oxo-7-(1-piperazinyl)quinoline-3-carboylic acid **Nalidixic acid ***Pipemidic acid
TABLE 2______________________________________In vivo antibacterial activity of the present compound Challenge dose MIC ED.sub.50Strain (cells/animal) Compound (.mu.g/ml) (mg/kg)______________________________________Staphylo- 2.4 .times. 10.sup.5 Present 0.05 3.7coccus (in BHI* compoundaureus Smith containing NA** 25 635 mucin) PPA*** 12.5 231E. coli 1.2 .times. 10.sup.7 Present 0.39 13.8ML4707 (in saline) compound NA** 3.13 38.3 PPA*** 1.56 38.9______________________________________ *Brain heart infusion **Nalidixic acid ***Pipemidic acid
TABLE 3______________________________________Tissue levels of the present compound Concentration (.mu.g/ml) Time after administration (hour)Animal Tissue 0.5 1.0 2.0 4.0 6.0______________________________________Mouse Serum 8.6 6.5 5.0 2.7 1.8 Lung 12.8 9.5 5.5 4.3 2.8 Liver 22.5 17.5 12.0 9.0 5.8Kidney 13.0 13.0 7.8 4.6 4.6Rat Serum 4.8 5.3 1.2 0.2 0.2 Lung 6.0 8.6 2.1 0.6 ND* Liver 14.0 15.4 6.2 2.2 0.8 Kidney 6.6 6.8 2.7 1.0 0.3______________________________________ *not detected
TABLE 4______________________________________Acute toxicity of the present compound in male miceRoute of LD.sub.50administration (mg/kg)______________________________________iv 250-300po >4,000______________________________________
Claims
  • 1. A compound having the following formula ##STR7## and a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof.
Priority Claims (1)
Number Date Country Kind
56-32274 Mar 1981 JPX
US Referenced Citations (3)
Number Name Date Kind
4125615 Matsumoto Nov 1978
4292317 Pesson Sep 1981
4327101 Mushika et al. Apr 1982
Non-Patent Literature Citations (1)
Entry
Morrison, et al., Organic Chemistry, Sec. Ed., 1966, Allyn and Bacon, Inc., Boston, pp. 466-467 and 730-735.