Patent Grant
9396245
This application is related to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/524,501, entitled “RESOURCE EFFECTIVE INCREMENTAL UPDATING OF A REMOTE CLIENT WITH EVENTS WHICH OCCURRED VIA A CLOUD-ENABLED PLATFORM”, filed Jun. 15, 2012; and to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/526,437, entitled “MANAGING UPDATES AT CLIENTS USED BY A USER TO ACCESS A CLOUD-BASED COLLABORATION SERVICE”, filed Jun. 18, 2012; both of which are hereby incorporated by reference in their entireties.
This application is also related to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/149,586, entitled “FILE SYSTEM MONITORING IN A SYSTEM WHICH INCREMENTALLY UPDATES CLIENTS WITH EVENTS THAT OCCURRED IN A CLOUD-BASED COLLABORATION PLATFORM”, filed Jan. 7, 2014, which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.
The use of electronic and digital content has greatly increased in enterprise settings or other organizations as the preferred mechanism for project, task, and work flow management, as has the need for streamlined collaboration and sharing of digital content and documents. In such an environment, multiple users share, access and otherwise perform actions or tasks on content and files in a shared workspace, where any number of users may have access to a given file or may want to or need to perform an action on the file at any given time.
The cloud-based nature of such an environment enables users/collaborators to access, view, edit content anytime, from any device, or using any number of and/or types of clients, simultaneously while other collaborators in the same group, enterprise, or other types of organizations may also be accessing, viewing, or editing the same file or content or content in the same work group. Among others, the different types of clients and the number of devices which can be used to access a single account or work item or cloud content in the cloud-based environment create problems of maintaining consistency and correct ordering in how changes are reflected at the clients that are used by users/collaborators. Updating a large number of collaborators within a limited amount of time when actions take place in the cloud-based environment further presents extra challenges.
The present embodiments are illustrated by way of example and are not intended to be limited by the figures of the accompanying drawings. In the drawings:
The same reference numbers and any acronyms identify elements or acts with the same or similar structure or functionality throughout the drawings and specification for ease of understanding and convenience.
Techniques are disclosed for race condition handling in a system which incrementally updates remote clients with events that occurred in a cloud-enabled platform. More specifically, some embodiments disclosed herein provide systems and methods for handling race conditions in a synchronization client, for example, when it receives updates from a cloud-based platform (e.g., via an action log framework (ALF), described further below). In one embodiment, a method comprises, in response to an event received at a synchronization client which indicates a modification to an item, comparing a sequence identifier of the item in the event with a current sequence identifier of the item. The sequence identifier of the item can be numeric and can monotonically increase as a state of the item changes. The method further comprises, if the sequence identifier in the event is larger than the current sequence identifier of the item, determining a difference between the item's state as represented in the event and a current state of the item. Then, based on the difference, at least one synchronization step to update the current state of the item to the item's state as represented in the event can be generated. In some embodiments, if the difference does not exist, the current sequence identifier of the item to the sequence identifier of the item in the event can be updated. In some embodiments, if the sequence identifier in the event is not larger than the current sequence identifier of the item, the event is discarded.
Among other benefits, the disclosed techniques can handle potential race conditions when ALF events are received out-of-order, thereby ensuring the correctness of data resulted from those events delivered to the synchronization client. In particular, some embodiments can operate in a way such that all possible race conditions must be accounted for, and generally no approximations are made. Additionally, some embodiments can be easily tunable for performance of individual components to maximize the responsiveness to the user. Also, the disclosed embodiments can be capable of accommodate throttling in order to ensure that too much processing or other device resources is consumed. Overall, the disclosed techniques can improve correctness, performance, and throttlability of a system which incrementally updates clients with events that occurred in the cloud-based platform.
The following description and drawings are illustrative and are not to be construed as limiting. Numerous specific details are described to provide a thorough understanding of the disclosure. However, in certain instances, well-known or conventional details are not described in order to avoid obscuring the description. References to one or an embodiment in the present disclosure can be, but not necessarily are, references to the same embodiment; and, such references mean at least one of the embodiments.
Reference in this specification to “one embodiment” or “an embodiment” means that a particular feature, structure, or characteristic described in connection with the embodiment is included in at least one embodiment of the disclosure. The appearances of the phrase “in one embodiment” in various places in the specification are not necessarily all referring to the same embodiment, nor are separate or alternative embodiments mutually exclusive of other embodiments. Moreover, various features are described which can be exhibited by some embodiments and not by others. Similarly, various requirements are described which can be requirements for some embodiments but not other embodiments.
The terms used in this specification generally have their ordinary meanings in the art, within the context of the disclosure, and in the specific context where each term is used. Certain terms that are used to describe the disclosure are discussed below, or elsewhere in the specification, to provide additional guidance to the practitioner regarding the description of the disclosure. For convenience, certain terms can be highlighted, for example using italics and/or quotation marks. The use of highlighting has no influence on the scope and meaning of a term; the scope and meaning of a term is the same, in the same context, whether or not it is highlighted. It will be appreciated that same thing can be said in more than one way.
Consequently, alternative language and synonyms can be used for any one or more of the terms discussed herein, nor is any special significance to be placed upon whether or not a term is elaborated or discussed herein. Synonyms for certain terms are provided. A recital of one or more synonyms does not exclude the use of other synonyms. The use of examples anywhere in this specification including examples of any terms discussed herein is illustrative only, and is not intended to further limit the scope and meaning of the disclosure or of any exemplified term. Likewise, the disclosure is not limited to various embodiments given in this specification.
Without intent to limit the scope of the disclosure, examples of instruments, apparatus, methods and their related results according to the embodiments of the present disclosure are given below. Note that titles or subtitles can be used in the examples for convenience of a reader, which in no way should limit the scope of the disclosure. Unless otherwise defined, all technical and scientific terms used herein have the same meaning as commonly understood by one of ordinary skill in the art to which this disclosure pertains. In the case of conflict, the present document, including definitions will control.
The client devices 102 can be any system and/or device, and/or any combination of devices/systems that is able to establish a communication or a connection, including wired, wireless, cellular connections with another device, a server and/or other systems such as host server 100 and/or a notification server 150. Client devices 102 typically include a display and/or other output functionalities to present information and data exchanged between among the devices 102, the notification server 150, and/or the host server 100.
For example, the client devices 102 can include mobile, hand held or portable devices or non-portable devices and can be any of, but not limited to, a server desktop, a desktop computer, a computer cluster, or portable devices including, a notebook, a laptop computer, a handheld computer, a palmtop computer, a mobile phone, a cell phone, a PDA, a smart phone (e.g., a BlackBerry device such as BlackBerry Z10/Q10, an iPhone, Nexus 4, etc.), a Treo, a handheld tablet (e.g. an iPad, iPad Mini, a Galaxy Note, Galaxy Note II, Xoom Tablet, Microsoft Surface, Blackberry PlayBook, Nexus 7, 10 etc.), a phablet (e.g., HTC Droid DNA, etc.), a tablet PC, a thin-client, a hand held console, a hand held gaming device or console (e.g., XBOX live, Nintendo DS, Sony PlayStation Portable, etc.), mobile-enabled powered watch (e.g., iOS, Android or other platform based), Google Glass, a Chromebook and/or any other portable, mobile, hand held devices, etc. running on any platform or any operating system (e.g., Mac-based OS (OS X, iOS, etc.), Windows-based OS (Windows Mobile, Windows 7, Windows 8, etc.), Android, Blackberry OS, Embedded Linux platforms, Palm OS, Symbian platform, Google Chrome OS, and the like. In one embodiment, the client devices 102, host server 100, and/or the notification server 150 (e.g., a server hosting application 120) are coupled via a network 106. In some embodiments, the devices 102 and host server 100 and/or notification server 150 may be directly connected to one another.
The input mechanism on client devices 102 can include touch screen keypad (including single touch, multi-touch, gesture sensing in 2D or 3D, etc.), a physical keypad, a mouse, a pointer, a track pad, motion detector (e.g., including 1-axis, 2-axis, 3-axis accelerometer, etc.), a light sensor, capacitance sensor, resistance sensor, temperature sensor, proximity sensor, a piezoelectric device, device orientation detector (e.g., electronic compass, tilt sensor, rotation sensor, gyroscope, accelerometer), or a combination of the above.
Signals received or detected indicating user activity at client devices 102 through one or more of the above input mechanism, or others, can be used by various users or collaborators (e.g., collaborators 108) for accessing, through network 106, a web-based collaboration environment or online collaboration platform (e.g., hosted by the host server 100). The collaboration environment or platform can have one or more collective settings 125 for an enterprise or an organization that the users belong, and can provide an user interface 104 for the users to access such platform under the settings 125.
The collaboration platform or environment hosts workspaces with work items that one or more users can access (e.g., view, edit, update, revise, comment, download, preview, tag, or otherwise manipulate, etc.). A work item can generally include any type of digital or electronic content that can be viewed or accessed via an electronic device (e.g., device 102). The digital content can include .pdf files, .doc, slides (e.g., Powerpoint slides), images, audio files, multimedia content, web pages, blogs, etc. A workspace can generally refer to any grouping of a set of digital content in the collaboration platform. The grouping can be created, identified, or specified by a user or through other means. This user may be a creator user or administrative user, for example.
In general, a workspace can be associated with a set of users or collaborators (e.g., collaborators 108) which have access to the content included therein. The levels of access (e.g., based on permissions or rules) of each user or collaborator to access the content in a given workspace may be the same or may vary among the users. Each user may have their own set of access rights to every piece of content in the workspace, or each user may be different access rights to different pieces of content. Access rights may be specified by a user associated with a workspace and/or a user who created/uploaded a particular piece of content to the workspace, or any other designated user or collaborator.
In general, the collaboration platform allows multiple users or collaborators to access or collaborate efforts on work items such each user can see, remotely, edits, revisions, comments, or annotations being made to specific work items through their own user devices. For example, a user can upload a document to a workspace for other users to access (e.g., for viewing, editing, commenting, signing-off, or otherwise manipulating). The user can login to the online platform and upload the document (or any other type of work item) to an existing workspace or to a new workspace. The document can be shared with existing users or collaborators in a workspace.
In general, network 106, over which the client devices 102 and the host server 100 communicate may be a cellular network, a telephonic network, an open network, such as the Internet, or a private network, such as an intranet and/or the extranet, or any combination or variation thereof. For example, the Internet can provide file transfer, remote log in, email, news, RSS, cloud-based services, instant messaging, visual voicemail, push mail, VoIP, and other services through any known or convenient protocol, such as, but is not limited to the TCP/IP protocol, Open System Interconnections (OSI), FTP, UPnP, iSCSI, NSF, ISDN, PDH, RS-232, SDH, SONET, etc.
The network 106 can be any collection of distinct networks operating wholly or partially in conjunction to provide connectivity to the client devices 102 and the host server 100 and may appear as one or more networks to the serviced systems and devices. In one embodiment, communications to and from the client devices 102 can be achieved by, an open network, such as the Internet, or a private network, such as an intranet and/or the extranet. In one embodiment, communications can be achieved by a secure communications protocol, such as secure sockets layer (SSL), or transport layer security (TLS).
In addition, communications can be achieved via one or more networks, such as, but are not limited to, one or more of WiMax, a Local Area Network (LAN), Wireless Local Area Network (WLAN), a Personal area network (PAN), a Campus area network (CAN), a Metropolitan area network (MAN), a Wide area network (WAN), a Wireless wide area network (WWAN), or any broadband network, and further enabled with technologies such as, by way of example, Global System for Mobile Communications (GSM), Personal Communications Service (PCS), Bluetooth, WiFi, Fixed Wireless Data, 2G, 2.5G, 3G (e.g., WCDMA/UMTS based 3G networks), 4G, IMT-Advanced, pre-4G, LTE Advanced, mobile WiMax, WiMax 2, WirelessMAN-Advanced networks, enhanced data rates for GSM evolution (EDGE), General packet radio service (GPRS), enhanced GPRS, iBurst, UMTS, HSPDA, HSUPA, HSPA, HSPA+, UMTS-TDD, 1xRTT, EV-DO, messaging protocols such as, TCP/IP, SMS, MMS, extensible messaging and presence protocol (XMPP), real time messaging protocol (RTMP), instant messaging and presence protocol (IMPP), instant messaging, USSD, IRC, or any other wireless data networks, broadband networks, or messaging protocols.
A diagrammatic illustration of the cloud-based environment (e.g., collaboration environment) and the relationships between workspaces and users/collaborators are illustrated with further reference to the example of
Embodiments of the present disclosure provide enhanced ability for race condition handling in a system that updates or informs remote clients 110-170 on user devices 102 based on events, actions, or changes (e.g., from user edits, updates, comments, etc.) that occurred in the cloud environment hosted by the host server 100.
In general, multiple users collaborate in the cloud-based environment hosted by server 100, and the user devices 102 of these users need to be appropriately updated such that the most current versions of data/content are synchronized with the relevant user devices and that notification of events are sent to the relevant devices/users in a timely and orderly fashion. Any given user can utilize any number and types of clients (e.g., synchronization client, real time web client, mobile synchronization client, mobile application, email client, server synchronization client, etc.) at any given time. Thus, the host server 100 and the remote synchronization clients 110-170 described herein together can implement the disclosed techniques in facilitating the orderly synchronizing or updating of the remote clients 110-170 which a given user/collaborator may use to access the cloud platform via any number of user devices 102.
In general, when a user action takes place, the user action is processed (e.g., as described in
Specifically, it is recognized in the disclosed embodiments that, although current implementations of the host server 100 already employs some mechanisms for solving out-of-order event problems (e.g., the revision ID, explained below, which can make sure the events can be written into the queue from which the client reads in a correct order), errors and/or race conditions can still take place on the client when the events arrive at the client in an out-of-order manner when they are delivered from the queue to the client.
Accordingly, the present embodiments of the synchronization client (e.g., client 110) can ensure the correctness of the synchronized tree and other synchronized items (e.g., folders or files) completely independent from the order in which the client receives events from the action log framework (“ALF”) system. In other words, so long as the ALF system correctly delivers all events to the synchronization client, the synchronization client can end up in the correct final state.
More implementation details regarding the synchronization clients 110-170, the host server 100, the repository 130, distributed data cluster 180, and various techniques in implementing race condition handling are discussed below.
The web-based platform for collaborating on projects or jointly working on documents can be used by individual users and shared among collaborators. In addition, the collaboration platform can be deployed in an organized setting including but not limited to, a company (e.g., an enterprise setting), a department in a company, an academic institution, a department in an academic institution, a class or course setting, or any other types of organizations or organized setting.
When deployed in an organizational setting, multiple workspaces (e.g., workspace A, B C) can be created to support different projects or a variety of work flows. Each workspace can have its own associate work items. For example, workspace A 205 can be associated with work items 215, workspace B 225 can be associated with work items 235, and workspace N can be associated with work items 255. The work items 215, 235, and 255 can be unique to each workspace but need not be. For example, a particular word document can be associated with only one workspace (e.g., workspace A 205) or it can be associated with multiple workspaces (e.g., Workspace A 205 and workspace B 225, etc.).
In general, each workspace has a set of users or collaborators associated with it. For example, workspace A 205 is associated with multiple users or collaborators 206. In some instances, workspaces deployed in an enterprise can be department specific. For example, workspace B can be associated with department 210 and some users shown as example user A 208 and workspace N 245 can be associated with departments 212 and 216 and users shown as example user B 214.
Each user associated with a workspace can generally access the work items associated with the workspace. The level of access depends on permissions associated with the specific workspace, and/or with a specific work item. Permissions can be set for the workspace or set individually on a per work item basis. For example, the creator of a workspace (e.g., one of user A 208 who creates workspace B) can set one permission setting applicable to all work items 235 for other associated users and/or users associated with the affiliate department 210, for example. Creator user A 208 can also set different permission settings for each work item, which can be the same for different users, or varying for different users.
In each workspace A, B . . . N, when an action is performed on a work item by a given user or any other activity is detected in the workspace, other users in the same workspace can be notified (e.g., in real time or in near real time, or not in real time). Activities which trigger real time notifications can include, by way of example but not limitation, adding, deleting, or modifying collaborators in the workspace, uploading, downloading, adding, deleting a work item in the workspace, creating a discussion topic in the workspace.
In some embodiments, items or content downloaded or edited can cause notifications to be generated. Such notifications can be sent to relevant users to notify them of actions surrounding a download, an edit, a change, a modification, a new file, a conflicting version, an upload of an edited or modified file.
In one embodiment, in a user interface to the web-based collaboration platform where notifications are presented, users can, via the same interface, create action items (e.g., tasks) and delegate the action items to other users including collaborators pertaining to a work item 215, for example. The collaborators 206 can be in the same workspace A 205 or the user can include a newly invited collaborator. Similarly, in the same user interface where discussion topics can be created in a workspace (e.g., workspace A, B or N, etc.), actionable events on work items can be created and/or delegated/assigned to other users such as collaborators of a given workspace 206 or other users. Through the same user interface, task status and updates from multiple users or collaborators can be indicated and reflected. In some instances, the users can perform the tasks (e.g., review or approve or reject, etc.) via the same user interface.
Each of users 316, 318, and 320 can individually use multiple different devices to access and/or manipulate work items 324 in the workspace 302 with which they are associated with. For example users 316, 318, 320 can be collaborators on a project to which work items 324 are relevant. Since the work items 324 are hosted by the collaboration environment (e.g., a cloud-based environment), each user can access the work items 324 anytime, and from any physical location using any device (e.g., including devices they own or any shared/public/loaner device).
Work items to be edited or viewed can be accessed from the workspace 302. Users can also be notified of access, edit, modification, and/or upload related-actions performed on work items 324 by other users or any other types of activities detected in the workspace 302. For example, if user 316 modifies a document, one or both of the other collaborators 318 and 320 can be notified of the modification in real time, or near real-time, or not in real time. The notifications can be sent through any of all of the devices associated with a given user, in various formats including, one or more of, email, SMS, or via a pop-up window in a user interface in which the user uses to access the collaboration platform. In the event of multiple notifications, each notification can be depicted preferentially (e.g., ordering in the user interface) based on user preferences and/or relevance to the user (e.g., implicit or explicit).
For example, a notification of a download, access, read, write, edit, or uploaded related activities can be presented in a feed stream among other notifications through a user interface on the user device according to relevancy to the user determined based on current or recent activity of the user in the web-based collaboration environment.
In one embodiment, the notification feed stream further enables users to create or generate actionable events (e.g., as task) which are or can be performed by other users 316 or collaborators 322 (e.g., including admin users or other users not in the same workspace), either in the same workspace 302 or in some other workspace. The actionable events such as tasks can also be assigned or delegated to other users via the same user interface.
For example, a given notification regarding a work item 324 can be associated with user interface features allowing a user 316 to assign a task related to the work item 324 (e.g., to another user 316, admin user 318, creator user 320 or another user). In one embodiment, a commenting user interface or a comment action associated with a notification can be used in conjunction with user interface features to enable task assignment, delegation, and/or management of the relevant work item or work items in the relevant workspaces, in the same user interface.
Further, in some of the present embodiments, the synchronization state of a folder can be: (i) synchronized, (ii) partially synchronized, or (iii) unsynchronized. For purposes of discussion herein, a folder is synchronized when all items (e.g., folders and files) under the folder are synchronized. Likewise, a folder is unsynchronized when all items (e.g., folders and files) under the folder are unsynchronized. A folder is partially synchronized when it is neither synchronized nor unsynchronized.
The server-side includes front end components 402A-N, a database 410, a dispatcher 430, one or more processors 440A-N, and a second database (e.g., HBase 460). The front end components 402A-N can interface with client devices/end user devices to detect/identify actions or transactions or events. The data or file change that occur as a result of the event is effectuated in the database 410 of the cloud-enabled platform (e.g., the relevant changes are made in the file table 411 of the database).
Depending on the type of action or event, an action log entry can be created and stored in the action log table or action log 416. In general, the front end 402 determines whether an action log entry is created from a given action or transaction. In general, an action log entry can be created for an action or event if certain durability requirements are to be met. The dispatcher 430 reads the action log entries from the action log 416 and sends them to the processors 440A-N where the fan-out, or collaborators to be notified of the event or to receive the file/data change as a result of the event is determined. Based on the computed fan-out or identified collaborators, the processors 440A-N writes the events/transactions to the relevant queues in the second database 460, from which remote clients can read.
It is noted also that the action log 416, the dispatcher 430, the processors 440A-N, the HBase 460, and one or more real time clients 470A-N (see
The queues in the database 460 (e.g., the distributed database cluster) are usually client type specific. For example, each queue is for a given client type for one given user. So, a user ‘A’ may have a synchronization client queue that all of the synchronization clients that user “A” uses reads from since user “A” may have multiple devices on which synchronization clients are installed. In general, the queues for clients in the database 460 are read only queues such that multiple clients can read from the same queue without making modifications. In this manner, if a user utilizes multiple synchronization clients, each client can still receive and detect the respective updates such that multiple devices can be synchronized. The remote clients also typically individually track the location in the queue from which they last read such that only the most recent events are updated at the client, and that the events read from a queue is specific to a given client, dependent on what has previously been synchronized or read.
In one embodiment, synchronization clients 480 connect to both real-time 470 and API front end 490 machines. The real time machines 470 can notify a synchronization client 480 when there has been an update in a user's account. The synchronization client 480 can then connect to API front end machine 490 to obtain the actual change/content. Alternatively, in some instances, the synchronization clients 480 can also obtain the changes/content/updates from the real time machines 470 simultaneous with the notification, or after being notified.
The front ends 502A-N detect, identify, or receive the various actions or events on data or content performed by users or collaborators in a cloud-based environment. For example, events/actions can include by way of example but not limitation, file renames, file uploads/downloads, file edits, comments, etc. Based on the type of event, the front end 502 determines whether the action/event is to be created into a log entry to be stored in the action log 516. In creating a log entry, each action/event is recorded as a transaction with the file system change for asynchronous processing. In recording the transaction, the relevant file/folder row in the file 511 of the database 510 is inserted, updated, deleted, or otherwise modified according to the action. In one embodiment, the row is inserted in to the action log table 516 simultaneously with the write to the file 511 and also with the performance of action itself. Note that each entry includes an owner ID 514 in the file 511 and in the action log 516 to represent the owner of the item upon which an action occurred.
In one embodiment, action log entries are created in the same database 510 as the file table 511 such that file/content rollback can be performed if the file/data/content change results in an error or failure. As such, the action log entry creation in the action log table 516 can be created, in part, to meet durability (e.g., longevity) requirements of a given event/transaction (e.g., write events, or other edit events typically have higher durability requirements than a comment event, or a share event, etc.).
Action log entries can be created for select types of events or all events. For example, events/transactions such as file renames, file uploads may have higher durability requirements than a comment event, or a share event, in a sense that the changes from a file rename/file upload need to be maintained and updated at various respective clients for the relevant collaborators and the implication for missing a file rename or file upload is potentially more severe than missing a comment event or a share event, etc.
In general, action log entries are generally created for actions/events with higher durability requirements. Such a determination can be made by the front ends 502 as to whether a given event type is to be writing into the action log table 516. Action log entries may also be created for all events with durability requirements carried out downstream at event queues stored in the second database (e.g., the database 460 of FIG. 4B). Table 516 shows the action log entries created from the events stored in the file table 511.
The action log entries can be identified by the action ID 517. In addition, each action log entry can be associated with a user (e.g., owner) identifier 518, a data entry 519, and/or a revision identifier 520. The user identifier 518 can identify a user who is to a recipient as a result of an event (e.g., upload file to User 1). The owner identifier 518 represents the owner of the item upon which an action (e.g., represented by action ID 517) occurred and in general, each work item has no more than one owner. The data field 519 can identify the type of action/event (e.g., rename, upload, edit, comment, share, send, download, etc.).
The revision identifier 520 can indicate the version of any change made to a given file (e.g., edit, rename, upload, etc.). In one embodiment, the revision identifier 520 is derived from version tracking mechanisms (e.g., via revision ID 515) inherent to the database 510. The revision identifier 520 can used by remote clients to resolve conflicts in view of potentially conflicting events/transactions. For example, if a file is re-named twice and both events are synchronized/updated at a remote client, the client can use the rename event associated with the latest revision ID to make the necessary updates. This can ensure that the client is updated with the most current change regardless of when the events are read from the queue. Thus, even if the two rename events are writing to the queue for the client out of order, the client can still make the ‘correct’ update using the revision ID in case of conflicting changes.
As aforementioned, although the host server 100 already employs one or more mechanisms (e.g., the revision ID which can make sure the events can be written into the queue from which the client reads in a correct order) for solving out-of-order event problems, errors and/or race conditions can still take place on the client when the events arrive at the client in an out-of-order manner when they are delivered from the queue to the client.
Accordingly, embodiments of the present disclosure include systems and methods for handling action log framework race conditions which can take place, for example, on a synchronization client when being updated about events from a cloud-based platform. In one embodiment, synchronization client implementing the disclosed techniques can maintain the correctness of synchronized items (e.g., files, folders, folder tree structure, etc.) completely independent from the order in which the client receives events from the action log framework (“ALF”) system. That is to say, so long as the ALF system correctly delivers all events to the synchronization client, the synchronization client can reach the correct final state.
More specifically, it is recognized in the present disclosure that the potential race conditions presented by the aforementioned ALF system 490 can fall into one or more of the following example categories: (I) single item race conditions, (II) impossible event sequence race conditions, or (III) folder tree materialization race conditions.
Single Item Race Conditions
The single item race conditions can occur when two events that modify the same field on a given item are received out-of-order. For example, suppose that there is a file X and receive two rename events (e.g., events 611 and 612) for that file, the first (e.g., event 612) indicating that the file should be renamed to Y and the second (e.g., event 611) indicating that the file should be renamed to Z. If the two rename events were received out-of-order and were applied without discretion, then the final name of the file on the synchronization client would be Y, which would be incorrect.
In accordance with the present embodiments, in response to an event received at a synchronization client which indicates a modification to an item, the synchronization client 480A can compare a sequence identifier of the item in the event with a current sequence identifier of the item. Specifically, the synchronization client can resolve the above scenario using a sequence identifier (Sequence_ID) attached to every item (e.g., a file object or a folder object) on the cloud-based platform (e.g., on workspace 302). An item's Sequence_ID field can monotonically increase when an item's core properties change. For example, the Sequence_ID can be incremented every time the file or folder's name, parent folder, or checksum (e.g., as result of content change) is changed on the cloud-based platform. In this way, the Sequence_ID can provide a monotonically increasing version identifier for the item.
Thus, when processing the renames from the above example, the synchronization client 480A can see that the rename to Z (e.g., of event 611) has a higher Sequence_ID than the rename to Y (e.g., of event 612) and thus that the final name of the item should be Z.
Further, it is observed that since the system uses one Sequence_ID for an item (e.g., a folder/file) as a whole rather than separate Sequence_IDs for each individual property or field of the object. If the system attempts to simply pass through events with higher Sequence_IDs and drop those events with lower Sequence_IDs, any out of order events may block all previous events from being executed even if the events are to modify different fields or properties. For example, an out-of-order rename might block a move, which can cause the item's final parent folder to be incorrect.
As such, in some embodiments, the synchronization client 480A can first compare the Sequence_ID for an incoming event to the current Sequence_ID of the item that event changes; if the Sequence_ID of the event is lower, then the event may be dropped, but if the Sequence_ID of the event is higher, the synchronization client 480A then can differentiates the state of the item in the event with a current state of the item, and the synchronization client 480A can generate one or more events that are deemed necessary to bring the two states in synchronization. Specifically, in some embodiments, the synchronization client 480A can determine a difference between the item's state as represented in the event and a current state of the item if the sequence identifier in the event is larger than the current sequence identifier of the item, and then, the synchronization client 480A can generate at least one synchronization step to update the current state of the item to the item's state as represented in the event based on the difference.
Moreover, one case of the single item race condition can occur when a field is changed to a new value and then subsequently changed back to its original value, and these two events are received out-of-order. An example of this is illustrated as event 615 where item 38's value is changed from A to B back to A. Assuming the event is updating item 38 to a state which appears to be the same as the current state of item 38 and the Sequence_ID of event 615 is higher than that of the current Sequence_ID for item 38, when the synchronization client 480A receives the higher Sequence_ID event, it might see that there is no difference between the current state of the item and the state of the item in the event, and thus it may determine that there are no events required to bring the two states in synchronization. Were it to respond by simply dropping the event, when it subsequently received the lower Sequence_ID event (e.g., event 616), it would see this event as having a higher Sequence_ID and generate an event to make the corresponding change (e.g., on the file system), resulting in the item moving into an incorrect state.
Accordingly, some embodiments of the synchronization client 480A can update the current sequence identifier of the item to the sequence identifier of the item in the event if there is no difference resulted from the comparison. For example, the synchronization client 480A can handle this scenario by generating an event (e.g., a “touch event,” not shown in
Another example case of the single item race condition can occur when a delete event (e.g., event 613) for an item is received out of order with the create event (e.g., event 614) for the item. In this scenario, when the synchronization client 480A receives the delete event, there is no action required (e.g., on the files system of client 480A) but there is also no item on the synchronization client 480A for which to send an aforementioned touch event to bump/update the Sequence_ID. As in the previous example, the synchronization client 480A should not simply drop the delete event 613 because it would then incorrectly create the item when it later receives the create event 614.
Accordingly, in some embodiments, the synchronization client 480A can generate a create event (not shown in
Impossible Event Sequence Race Conditions
Impossible event sequence race conditions may occur when events are provided by the ALF system 490 to the synchronization client 480A in an order that is impossible for the synchronization client 480A to apply to the file system (e.g., where the synchronization client 480A is located) while still observing some of the standard file system rules. Examples of these rules can include an item cannot be added to a folder that does not exist, no two items in the same folder can have the same name. Another example rule is that a non-empty folder cannot be deleted.
In some embodiments, after the synchronization client 480A has determined that an event represents a future state of the item and has manufactured the corresponding events that need to be applied on the opposite file system (e.g., in ways described above), it passes each event through an event filter pipeline, which can check if the event is consistent with the current state of the file system.
If the event fails any of the required checks, the event can be buffered until more events are received and the aggregate can potentially successfully pass though the filter (e.g., when a subsequent event modifies the same item as or an related item of the buffered event), at which point the buffered event is retried and potentially re-buffered if it still fails the checks. Further, in some implementations, if an event remains buffered in the event filter pipeline for longer than a configurable maximum time limit, the event filter pipeline can drop the event, and some embodiments of the synchronization client 480A may report that a full scan of file/folder status within the synchronization scope is required to resolve the inconsistency.
Tree Materialization Race Conditions
Tree materialization race conditions can occur when an entire tree structure (of the folders) either enters or leaves the synchronization scope of a client without ALF events being generated for each item in the tree. With ALF system 490, scenarios in which this type of race condition may occur include, for example, a folder is synchronized or unsynchronized, copied into a synchronized folder, or moved into or out of a synchronized folder.
Specifically, the present embodiments recognized that, because it is desirable to minimize the amount of scanning (e.g., of tree structure) required for tree materialization or dematerialization, in each of the cases mentioned above, the above-mentioned ALF system 490 only generates one ALF event on the top-level folder of the tree that experienced the change. This can present two distinct problems. First, because events are not received for every item being added to or removed from the synchronization scope, the synchronization client 480A may need to perform at least some amount of scanning to create the correct tree, but there are a variety of race conditions that can occur. As such, in one implementation the synchronization client 480A can respond to all folder moves, copies, synchronization, and unsynchronizations by performing a full scan; however, it is noted that this can create a large amount of data traffic due to the scanning.
Second, current scans to materialize or de-materialize the tree do not return enough information to completely protect the tree from being corrupted by those events which (i) occur in the tree before the materialization or dematerialization and (ii) are only received by the synchronization client 480A after the materialization or dematerialization. Specifically, the scans the current system employ do not return any information about the deleted or unsynchronized items in the scanned tree, and because the out-of-order nature, it is still possible to receive create events for these deleted and unsynchronized items after the scan has been performed. At that point, the synchronization client 480A may not have enough information to prevent it from re-creating the deleted or unsynchronized item, thereby corrupting the tree. An example scenario is as follows:
(1) An item in an unsynchronized tree is created and deleted in workspace 302, and the tree then becomes synchronized.
(2) The create event is somehow delayed so that the first event processed by the ALF system 490 is the delete event, which is not sent to the synchronization client 480A because the tree has not yet been synchronized.
(3) The tree becomes synchronized and the synchronization event is sent to the synchronization client 480A.
(4) The create event is processed by the ALF system 490 and is delivered to the synchronization client 480A since the tree is now synchronized.
(5) The synchronization client 480A receives the synchronization event and performs a scan of the synchronized tree. The scan does not return any information about the deleted item.
(6) The synchronization client 480A receives the create event for the deleted item. At this point, the client 480A has no knowledge that the item is deleted and the create event appears like any other create. The synchronization client 480A thus adds the deleted item to its tree erroneously.
In accordance with some embodiments, if the item is a folder and the modification results in the folder entering or leaving a synchronization scope of the synchronization client 480A, the synchronization client 480A can perform a scan of a tree structure of synchronized folders on the synchronization client 480A. In some examples, the scan can include information regarding all items deleted within a select time period of the scan. In one specific example, for deleted items, all items deleted within some time period X of the scan can be included in the scan result. This information can then be used to filter out any create events for these deleted items so that the create events that are received can become trustworthy if any of the events' appearance in the ALF stream has not been delayed by longer than X.
In additional or alternative examples, the scan can include information regarding all unsynchronized folders which are located inside a synchronized folder. Specifically, for creates that are delayed by longer than X, a scan of tree structure (e.g., the structure as shown in
Additionally or alternatively, all events that occurred before the scan can be dropped. Specifically, some implementation of the synchronization client 480A can identify a timestamp of the scan, and discard all ALF events which occurred on the workspace 302 before the scan. This can prevent the synchronization client 480A from attempting to apply any create events for items that are deleted when the scan occurs, since based on logic those create events must have happened before the scan is performed. However, it is noted that clock skew between servers, event time resolution, and the time performing a scan on the cloud server 100 requires may reduce (sometimes significantly) the reliability of using the timestamp to determine whether an event has occurred in a given scan or not. It is also noted that this technique might not scale well with partial scans. When full scans are performed, the system only needs to keep track of the timestamp of the last full scan and can compare all event times against this timestamp. Once partial scans are performed, track timestamps for every sub-tree that has been partially scanned becomes necessary, and determining what sub-tree an event is in when it occurs for every event can be difficult.
Additional Examples of Optimization
The handling of folder move, copy, synchronization, and unsynchronization events can also be optimized so that the synchronization client 480A need not perform a full scan every time it receives one of these events. The following are some example techniques which the synchronization client 480A can employ.
A. Partial Scans are Performed Instead of Full Scans.
It is recognized in the present disclosure that switching to partial scans of the affected sub-tree from full scans can cut down the cost of each scan.
However, several potential issues may need to be addressed in order to implement partial scans. For example, there may exist a race condition where, if a subfolder is synchronized and then moved to a new folder tree, and the synchronization client 480A performs the scan of the synchronized subfolder after the move has occurred, then the synchronization client 480A can end up with an incomplete synchronization tree. In this particular scenario, when the subfolder is initially synchronized, all the folder's descendants may become synchronized while all its ancestors may become partially synchronized, meaning that the folders files become synchronized but not other folders they contain.
Upon moving the synchronized folder to the new tree, the folder's new ancestors become partially synchronized while the folders old ancestors remain partially synchronized. Thus, the correct end result for the synchronization client is to have both the synchronized subfolder's old and new ancestors in its synchronization tree. However, if the synchronization client 480A does not perform the partial scan on the synchronized subfolder until after the subfolder has moved, the scan may only return information about the subfolder's current ancestors, leaving the synchronization client 480A with no information about the subfolder's old ancestors and thus rendering them unsynchronized.
In accordance with some embodiments, the synchronization client 480A can generate a synchronization event for a lowest partially synchronized folder in a given path when the last fully synchronized folder, which is a descendant folder in the path, is moved out from the path to a new path. It is recognized in the present disclosure that this may be the earliest instance for the synchronization client 480A to miss the partially synchronized path in its other scans, and the server 100 is already marking this folder in the database at this point to preserve its partially synchronized status.
Additionally, it is recognized that partial scans can also cause problems for synchronized trees with nested collaborations when the top-level collaboration is removed. Assuming the subfolder synchronized is below the lower level collaboration, the correct behavior in this scenario is for the partially synchronized folders above the lower level collaboration folder to disappear and the lower level collaboration folder to become the new root-level folder for the tree. However, just performing a scan on the former top-level folder can cause the entire tree to be deleted since the scan can return an empty tree; moreover, just performing a scan on the new top-level folder can result in that folder being moved to the root-level since it's impossible to infer ancestor deletes from a partial scan of a folder.
It is recognized in the present disclosure that the aforementioned transformation may require partial scans to be performed on both the former top-level collaborated folder as well as the current top-level collaborated folder. In accordance with some embodiments, the synchronization client 480A can initiate partial scans on both a former top-level collaborated folder and a current top-level collaborated folder if there exists nested collaborations and if the modification results in removal of a top-level collaboration.
It is noted, however, that introducing two events comes with a potential performance penalty since if the client 480A receives the unsynchronization event for the old top-level collaboration folder before receiving the synchronization event for the new top-level collaboration folder, the client 480A may delete the whole tree before re-downloading the portion it should keep.
B. Scans are Performed Only Once Per Event.
In some embodiments, filtering can be used to detect duplicate folder move, copy, synchronization, and unsynchronization events so that scans only need to be performed on the first event received by the synchronization client 480A.
In some instances, Sequence_ID filtering can be used to detect duplicate events (e.g., folder move, copy, synchronization, or unsynchronization events), and the synchronization client 480A only perform scans only on a first event received. However, it is noted that because these events can affect entire sub-trees, the scan still needs to be performed even if the folder which the event occurred on has already reached a higher Sequence_ID state on the synchronization client. An example scenario explains this problem:
(1) A folder is created, a file is uploaded into that folder, the folder is synchronized, and then the folder is renamed.
(2) The upload event is processed first, before the folder has been synchronized, and is therefore not delivered to the synchronization client.
(3) The folder create and rename events are processed next, after the folder has been synchronized but before the synchronization event has been processed.
(4) The synchronization client would thus receive the create and rename events first and, if it performed filtering based on the Sequence_ID for the synchronization event, would drop them, resulting in the synchronization client missing the file uploaded into the folder.
As such, in one embodiment, the synchronization client 480A can employ a separate event de-duplication filter which can be based on Event_ID rather than Sequence_ID to resolve de-duplicating scan triggering events. For example, the filter can be a small cache of Event_IDs for recently seen events (or in some embodiments, recently seen scan triggering events in applications where more targeted de-duplication is preferred), allowing the synchronization client 480A to drop the events if it detects them being duplicative. It is also noted that restricting Sequence_IDs to never have gaps can mitigate the above described problem. As such, in one embodiment, the Sequence_ID logic as implemented in the synchronization client 480 can apply events once all previous events have been applied (e.g., by start incrementing the Sequence_ID for synchronization/unsynchronization events) instead of dropping old events as previously discussed.
C. Scans are not Performed for Moves of Folders that the Synchronization Client Already has Locally.
In some embodiments, a scan is not be necessary for a folder move where the folder does not move into or out of synchronization scope. In these cases, the synchronization client 480A can receive events for all changes inside the tree and can, for example, move the current tree to its new destination if the tree already exists locally, or create the folder in its current location if it does not.
However, because events can arrive at the synchronization client 480A out of order, it may become difficult or sometimes event impossible to guarantee that, when a move occurs, the tree being moved has never been outside the synchronization scope. An example scenario explains this problem:
(1) A folder is unsynchronized and a file is then uploaded into that folder.
(2) The upload event is processed and is not delivered to the synchronization client because the folder is no longer synchronized. The unsynchronization event is delayed.
(3) The folder is moved into another synchronized folder. This move event is processed by the ALF system and received by the synchronization client while it still has both the old and new parents locally. This appears like a move within synchronization scope to the client and so the client would simply move the folder locally.
(4) The unsynchronization event is finally processed and sent to the synchronization client. The synchronization client unsynchronizes the old parent folder, but it is too late at this point for the synchronization client to realize that the previous move was actually a move into synchronization scope and required a scan. The file that was uploaded into the moved folder is thus never downloaded.
Accordingly, in some embodiments, the workspace 302 can log folder moves recursively instead of only on the top-level folder moved. This technique may remove the need for scans on moves in general, and the synchronization client 480A can use its state differentiating logic (as mentioned above) to determine whether any change is actually required in response to a move event. It is noted that, in these embodiments, move events are logged for recently deleted items as well, so that the move results exactly mimic the results of a scan. Also, in at least some of these embodiments, the de-duplicating logic is implemented on the server 110 (e.g., as compared to the synchronization client 480A). In addition, control over what constitutes recently deleted can be implemented on the server 100 (e.g., instead of the client 480A) since, in these embodiments, the server 100 decides for all clients (e.g., client 480A-480N) which events get logged and which do not.
In another implementation, scans for folder copy events can be reduced or removed completely through the aforementioned recursive logging technique since a brand new folder tree is created, and therefore there are no recently deleted items that need events logged.
D. Scans are not Performed for Unsynchronization Events.
In some embodiments, upon receiving an unsynchronization event, the synchronization client 480A is implemented to respond by deleting the unsynchronized folder tree locally.
However, it is recognized in the present disclosure that the synchronization state of the tree depends on the precise order in which synchronization and unsynchronization events are executed on the tree, and that this ordering dependency stretches across different items in the tree. An example scenario explains this problem:
(1) The folder tree /A/B, /A/C is synchronized.
(2) Folder A is unsynchronized and Folder B is synchronized. The synchronized tree should become /A/B/
(3) If the synchronization client receives the unsynchronization event on A and then the synchronization event on B, it would delete the tree and then re-create it with its scan of B. However, if it received the unsynchronization event on A second, it would end up simply deleting the whole tree.
(4) If however, the unsynchronization event on A were actually executed second on the server, the final empty tree state would be the correct one.
E. Echoback Moves do not Result in any Scans.
Similarly, in some embodiments, scans are not performed on echoback move events, since these events can only have been performed on the synchronization client 480A if both folders involved in the move had been synchronized on the client 480A when the move occurred. For purposes of discussion herein, “echoback events” are event representing the same modification to the item originates from the sync client, to the workspace, and comes back to the same sync client again.
However, similar to what is mentioned previously, simply because the two folders are synchronized on the synchronization client 480A when the move occurred does not necessarily result that they are synchronized on the cloud server 100 when the move occurred. That is to say, it is possible that the move is a move into synchronization scope, rather than a move within synchronization scope. Consequently, that event may have been missed on the moved tree while it was outside of synchronization scope, necessitating a scan.
In this way, the disclosed techniques can handle file system modification events (e.g., Creates, Edits, Moves, Renames, and Deletes) and thus can reduce or avoid race condition when updating the collaborators (e.g., of their synchronization clients).
Table I includes a list of example race conditions which can be used, for example, for verifying functionalities in implementing the race condition handling techniques disclosed herein.
The mobile device 700 can include, for example, a bus 702, and a memory 704 among other components. The memory 704 may include, among others, a synchronization client 780, which can include a raw event processor 782, a file system monitor 784, an event filter pipeline 785 with one or more event filters 785a, and an event buffer 786. The memory 704 can also include a communication module 706 that facilitates communication among the mobile device 700, the host server 100, and other components discussed herein (e.g., the ALF system 490) using any of the communication protocols that are supported. The memory 704 may also include other device modules (not shown in
As used herein, a “module,” “a manager,” an “interface,” or an “engine” includes a general purpose, dedicated or shared processor and, typically, firmware or software modules that are executed by the processor. Depending upon implementation-specific or other considerations, the module, manager, interface, or engine can be centralized or its functionality distributed. The module, manager, interface, or engine can include general or special purpose hardware, firmware, or software embodied in a computer-readable (storage) medium for execution by the processor. As used herein, a computer-readable medium or computer-readable storage medium is intended to include all media that are statutory (e.g., in the United States, under 35 U.S.C. §101), and to specifically exclude all media that are non-statutory in nature to the extent that the exclusion is necessary for a claim that includes the computer-readable (storage) medium to be valid. Known statutory computer-readable mediums include hardware (e.g., registers, random access memory (RAM), non-volatile (NV) storage, to name a few), but may or may not be limited to hardware.
The bus 702 is a subsystem for transferring data between the components of the mobile device 700. For example, the bus 702 facilitates the transfer of data between the memory 704 and other components of the mobile device such as the processor and/or the input/output components that utilize the data.
As previously mentioned, over all, the present embodiments can provide race condition handling capabilities to the synchronization client 780.
In one embodiment of the present disclosure, during normal operations, the synchronization client 780 can operate in one or both of two modes. When in a listening mode, a listener module 782a (e.g., as a thread running in the operating system of device 700) can receive new events reported from the host server 100 (e.g., via the ALF system) as these events occur, and the raw event processor 782 can process these events in manners described herein. During a startup phase of the synchronization client 780, or when there is an inconsistency (e.g., resulted from a potential violation of local file system rules), the synchronization client 780 may switch into a full scan mode, in which the full scanner 782b can request that all existing files and folders, for example, be retrieved from the workspace 302 (e.g., in host server 100) and turned into events.
According to some embodiments, the raw event processor 782 can receives events from the ALF system 490 which represents that a modification to an item (e.g., a file or a folder) has taken place on the workspace 302, and can function together with other components to process the received raw events, such as the generating of the aforementioned synchronization steps which can bring the state of the item as indicated in the received event and the current state of the item in synchronization (e.g., by selectively updating the current state) after deemed appropriate (e.g., by the file system monitor 784).
In a particular embodiment, the file system monitor 784 can cause the sync client 780 to receive (e.g., using the listener 782a) or to retrieve (e.g., using the full scanner 782b) events from the workspace 302 and to normalize those events (e.g., using aforementioned Sequence_ID or other techniques described herein) so that the events can be executed correctly. The file system monitor 784 can operate multiple processes to, for example, receive raw events with the listener 782a, retrieve events with the full scanner 782b, generate synchronization steps with the event processor 782, normalize events with the event filter pipeline 785, and control the operating status of the file system monitor 784 itself by responding to start, stop, pause, and resume, as well as transitioning between the aforementioned listen and full scan mode.
According to some embodiments, after an event indicating a modification to an item is received from the host server 100 (e.g., via the ALF system 490), the file system monitor 784 can initiate the event's processing by requesting the raw event processor 782 (e.g., the full scanner 782b or the listener 782a) to send that event through the event filter pipeline 785. Then, the event filter pipeline 785 can utilize one or more filters in the event filters 785a to identify whether execution of the event can cause violation of any local file system rule. Examples of these local file system rules can include: (1) an item cannot be added to a folder that does not exist; (2) no two items in the same folder can have the same name; and/or (3) a non-empty folder cannot be deleted. If the execution of the event can cause violation of any rule, the event filter pipeline can buffer the event in the event buffer 786 until a subsequent event arrives. The event filter pipeline 785 can then identify whether execution of an aggregate of the events is to violate any local file system rule. If the execution of the aggregate of the events is to violate any rule, the event filter pipeline 785 can continue to buffer the subsequent event until another subsequent event arrives. Additionally, in some implementations, if an event remains buffered in the event filter pipeline 785 for longer than a configurable maximum time limit, the event filter pipeline 785 can drop the event, and some embodiments of the synchronization client 780 may report (e.g., via the full scanner 782b) that a full scan of file/folder status within the synchronization scope is required to resolve the inconsistency.
Further, the result of this processing can be used to update the raw event processor 782 according to a set of transition rules. An example pseudocode describes this functionality is provided as follows:
It is noted that the current generator in the example psuedocode can be, in some examples, one or more threads that are operated by (e.g., the raw event processor 782 of) the file system monitor 784 in implementing the techniques described herein. Similarly, the transition generator in the example psuedocode can be, in some examples, one or more threads that are operated by (e.g., the event filter pipeline 785 of) the file system monitor 784 in implementing the techniques described herein.
Continuing with the psuedocode example, the current generator can be, for example, maintained using a finite state machine. One example of a default transition in such finite state machine can be as follows:
And, an example of the state transition of the current generator, can be as follows:
It is noted that, in the example psuedocode, a call is placed to reset the current generator before it is replaced rather than deleting it. This implementation may be important in some example situations.
In one example, some generators may generate inconsistencies when they are in a “background” mode. For example, if the local listener 782a receives an event while the local full scanner 782b is running, then this can generate an inconsistency at handoff time so that the full scan can be repeated. As such, in one embodiment, the local listener 782a can return an inconsistency if it receives any events between the call to reset( ) and the first call to next_event( ). In another example, if the full scanner 782b encounters an inconsistency, another full scan can be performed. The reset call can, therefore, allow the full scanner 782b to reset its state between scans.
In some embodiments, the full scanner 782b and listener 782a can be implemented to inherit from a FSRawEventGenerator class which exposes next_event( ) in the class's public interface. In some implementations, a Python ‘yield’ keyword can be used which can hide the implementation details of how the events are produced from the file system monitor 784. For example, the local listener 782a can spawn a new watchdog thread which fills a queue (not shown for simplicity) with new events. The function call, next_event( ), can then return an event from the queue.
On the other hand, the full scanner 782b can make a get_account_tree (GAT) command to the ALF system 490, and then parse the response for a number of events. In one or more embodiments, the full scanner 782b can return events are soon as they are parsed while maintaining the state of the parsing.
Depending on the embodiment, calls made to next_event( ) may or may not be blocking. For example, if the full scanner 782b has no reason to block (e.g., because it has parsed the entire GAT response), then the full scanner 782b can immediately return “None” to indicate that the full scanner 782b has no further events, and therefore the monitor 784 should enter the listening mode. On the other hand, the local listener 782a may need to block for a new event in order to prevent the file system monitor 784 from busy waiting. Notably, in implementation, in order to accommodate blocking next_event( ) calls and still be able to terminate quickly when STOP is called, the FSRawEventGenerator class can, for example, include a public method “release_control( ).” In non-blocking generators, this call can be a no-op; however, in blocking generators, this call can immediately return “None,” thereby allowing the monitor 784 to shutdown gracefully.
It is further recognized in the present disclosure that the events that come out of the raw event processor 782 often need to be normalized. For example, as is discussed below, a move event can be received as a delete event and a create event, and the events can be reordered when they arrive from the ALF 490. Also, operations performed on an item by a synchronization client 780 to the cloud-based platform (e.g., workspace 302) can generate echo-back copies of the event (e.g., event representing the same modification to the item originates from the sync client, to the workspace, and comes back to the same sync client again), which need normalization/processing as well.
The event filter pipeline 785 in the file system monitor 784 can be responsible for normalizing raw events received from the cloud-based platform (e.g., workspace 302 through ALF 490) into synchronization event (or synchronization steps) that are safe to apply on the local file system where the synchronization client 780 operates. As mentioned before, because the cloud-based platform (e.g., workspace 302) does not provide any ordering guarantees around the delivery of events, the event filter pipeline 785 can perform the guaranteeing that, for example, a given raw event received which represents a future state of the associated item (e.g., by its Sequence_ID or other suitable indications) is not applied until the item can be moved into that state without violating any local file system rules.
Some embodiments of the event filter pipeline 785 can treat each raw event in the cloud-based platform (e.g., each ALF event from the ALF system 490) as a state update notification for a specific item (e.g., a file or a folder). Each raw event (which is to pass through the event filter pipeline 785 can include, in some examples, the full state of the item affected by the event.
In some embodiments, the event filter pipeline 785 then can compare the state of the item as indicated by the event against the current state of that item as stored on the local mobile device 700. The comparison can be used to determine whether the received event represents a newer version of the item, whether the newer state in the event is currently valid, and/or which synchronization steps need to be generated to move the item from its current state on the mobile device 700 to its newer state in the event.
In addition, the event filter pipeline 785 can include one or more of the following example filter components in the event filters 785a in order to carry out the functionalities of the event filter pipeline 785 described herein:
A. Raw Retrieve Shadow Item Filter
The raw retrieve shadow item filter can retrieve the current state of the item affected by the event from (e.g., a local storage of) the local mobile device 700. This current item state can be used, for example, by later stages in the pipeline 785 to determine whether the event represents a newer state for the item and what synchronization steps need to be generated for the item to move it from its shadow state to the event state.
B. Drop Duplicate Raw Events Filter
The drop duplicate raw events filter can compare the Sequence_ID in the event item state with the Sequence_ID in the current item state to determine if the event item state is newer. In some embodiments, the drop duplicate raw events filter can drop the event if the event represents an older state of the item. In one or more embodiments, however, this check can be skipped for events originating from either the full scanner 782b or a partial scanner 782c since (a) events from the scanners are typically guaranteed to represent the current state of the item; and (b) the scanners detect item deletions through the absence of the item in the scan result, and therefore the scanners typically do not have access to an updated Sequence_ID for deletion events.
C. Folder Sync and Unsync Filter
The folder synchronization and unsynchronization filter can determine whether the received event represents a folder synchronization/unsynchronization. If the event does represent so, the event filters 785a indicates to the file system monitor 784 that a partial scan is required for the specified folder.
D. File System Conflict Filter
The local file system conflict filter can check if the event item state is consistent with the current state(s) of the rest of the local items based on local file system rules. Examples of these local file system rules can include: (1) an item cannot be added to a folder that does not exist; (2) no two items in the same folder can have the same name; and/or (3) a non-empty folder cannot be deleted. So, if the event item state indicates that the item is not deleted, the local file system conflict filter can check that the item's parent folder exists and that there is no other item with the same name in that folder. If the event item state indicates that the item is deleted and the item is a folder, the local file system conflict filter can check that the folder is empty. If any of these checks fails, the item event is buffered until the checks can pass (e.g., upon receiving further events).
E. Raw Event to Sync Event Filter
The raw event to synchronization event (or synchronization step) filter can generate the synchronization steps or synchronization events necessary to transform the item from the shadow item state to the event item state based on the differences between the shadow item state and the event item state. In some embodiments, this filter can also update the current state of the item with the new state of the item.
The event filter pipeline 785 can also include an event buffer 786 to buffer events. For example, in some particular implementations, a move event can be recorded by the local listener 782a as a delete event followed quickly by a create event. The event buffer 786 can buffer the delete event for a small amount of time and attempts to resolve it with a create event. Events can be held in the buffer until either the event resolves (e.g., when the filter pipeline 785 receives another event process operation) or until a buffer time expires (e.g., at which point the filter pipeline 785 can execute a flush buffer operation).
Continuing with the above pseudocode example, in some instances, this may present a problem with blocking calls to next_event( ). For example, if a delete event is received, the delete event may be buffered until another event happens on the local file system, which could be not for a some time. To remedy this, according to some embodiments, when an event process operation or a flush buffer operation is called on the filter pipeline 785, the pipeline 785 can return a next time at which the buffer 786 is to be flushed. Then, the next call to next_event( ) can specify the maximum time for which the call may block to the generator.
In this way, the disclosed techniques of the sync client 780 can handle race conditions of events in the cloud-based platform. In addition, the sync client 780 can bring the benefit of resilience to out of order events so as to minimize unnecessary full scans and to provide support for lock/unlock and collaboration/uncollaboration events in the cloud-based platform.
Among other benefits, the disclosed embodiments can bring the benefit of extensibility, maintainability, and testability. For extensibility, the disclosed embodiments can be extensible to handle any additional modes of generating new events, more complicated methods of normalizing events, and more complicated transitions and inconsistency handling. For maintainability, the disclosed embodiments can be easily maintained because modularization. Additionally, minor changes to execution logic do not require substantial changes to the design. For testability, each component can be tested individually, as well as the control mechanisms, in a single threaded manner. Further, multithreaded integration tests can be easily performed and designed as well.
First, in accordance with some embodiments, in response to an event received at a synchronization client which indicates a modification to an item, the synchronization client 480A can compare (810) a sequence identifier of the item in the event with a current sequence identifier of the item. Specifically, the synchronization client can resolve the above scenario using a sequence identifier (Sequence_ID) attached to every item (e.g., a file object or a folder object) on the cloud-based platform (e.g., on workspace 302). An item's Sequence_ID field can monotonically increase (812) when an item's core properties change. For example, the Sequence_ID can be incremented every time the file or folder's name, parent folder, or checksum (e.g., as result of content change) is changed on the cloud-based platform. In this way, the Sequence_ID can provide a monotonically increasing version identifier for the item.
Then, in some embodiments, the synchronization client 480A can first compare the Sequence_ID for an incoming event to the current Sequence_ID of the item that event changes; if the Sequence_ID of the event is lower, then the event may be dropped (925), but if the Sequence_ID of the event is higher, the synchronization client 480A then can differentiates (820) the state of the item in the event with a current state of the item, and the synchronization client 480A can generate one or more events that are deemed necessary to bring the two states in synchronization. Specifically, in some embodiments, the synchronization client 480A can determine (820) a difference between the item's state as represented in the event and a current state of the item if the sequence identifier in the event is larger than the current sequence identifier of the item, and then, the synchronization client 480A can generate (830) at least one synchronization step to update the current state of the item to the item's state as represented in the event based on the difference.
Further, after step 830, some embodiments of the synchronization client 480A can update (935) the current sequence identifier of the item to the sequence identifier of the item in the event if there is no difference resulted from the comparison. For example, the synchronization client 480A can handle this scenario by generating an event (e.g., a “touch event”) to bump/update the Sequence_ID on an item (e.g., from 6 to 8, using the examples of
According to some embodiments, after an event indicating a modification to an item is received from the host server 100 (e.g., via the ALF system 490), the file system monitor 784 can initiate the event's processing by requesting the raw event processor 782 (e.g., the full scanner 782b or the listener 782a) to send that event through the event filter pipeline 785. Then, the event filter pipeline 785 can utilize one or more filters in the event filters 785a to identify (1010) whether execution of the event can cause violation of any local file system rule. Examples of these local file system rules can include: (1) an item cannot be added to a folder that does not exist; (2) no two items in the same folder can have the same name; and/or (3) a non-empty folder cannot be deleted.
If the execution of the event can cause (1020) violation of any rule, the event filter pipeline can buffer (1020) the event in the event buffer 786 until a subsequent event arrives. If the execution of the event is not to violate any local file system rule, the sync client 780 can execute (1025) the event.
Then, upon the arrival of the subsequent event, the event filter pipeline 785 can identify (1030) whether execution of an aggregate of the events is to violate any local file system rule. If the execution of the aggregate of the events is to violate any rule, the event filter pipeline 785 can continue to buffer (1035) the subsequent event until another subsequent event arrives. If the execution of the aggregate of the events is not to violate any local file system rule, the sync client 780 can execute (1037) the aggregate of the events.
Continuing with the example process 1000, in some implementations, if an event remains buffered in the event filter pipeline 785 for longer than a configurable maximum time limit, the event filter pipeline 785 can drop (1140) the event, and some embodiments of the synchronization client 780 may report (1150) (e.g., via the full scanner 782b) that a full scan of file/folder status within the synchronization scope is required to resolve the inconsistency.
In this way, among other advantages, the present embodiments can ensure the correctness of the synchronized tree and other synchronized items (e.g., folders or files) completely independent from the order in which the client receives events from the action log framework (“ALF”) system. In other words, so long as the ALF system correctly delivers all events to the synchronization client, the synchronization client can end up in the correct final state.
In alternative embodiments, the machine operates as a standalone device or can be connected (e.g., networked) to other machines. In a networked deployment, the machine can operate in the capacity of a server or a client machine in a client-server network environment, or as a peer machine in a peer-to-peer (or distributed) network environment.
The machine can be a server computer, a client computer, a personal computer (PC), a user device, a tablet, a phablet, a laptop computer, a set-top box (STB), a personal digital assistant (PDA), a thin-client device, a cellular telephone, an iPhone, an iPad, a Blackberry, a processor, a telephone, a web appliance, a network router, switch or bridge, a console, a hand-held console, a (hand-held) gaming device, a music player, any portable, mobile, hand-held device, or any machine capable of executing a set of instructions (sequential or otherwise) that specify actions to be taken by that machine.
While the machine-readable medium or machine-readable storage medium is shown in an exemplary embodiment to be a single medium, the term “machine-readable medium” and “machine-readable storage medium” should be taken to include a single medium or multiple media (e.g., a centralized or distributed database, and/or associated caches and servers) that store the one or more sets of instructions. The term “machine-readable medium” and “machine-readable storage medium” shall also be taken to include any medium that is capable of storing, encoding or carrying a set of instructions for execution by the machine and that cause the machine to perform any one or more of the methodologies of the presently disclosed technique and innovation.
In general, the routines executed to implement the embodiments of the disclosure, can be implemented as part of an operating system or a specific application, component, program, object, module or sequence of instructions referred to as “computer programs.” The computer programs typically comprise one or more instructions set at various times in various memory and storage devices in a computer, and that, when read and executed by one or more processing units or processors in a computer, cause the computer to perform operations to execute elements involving the various aspects of the disclosure.
Moreover, while embodiments have been described in the context of fully functioning computers and computer systems, those skilled in the art will appreciate that the various embodiments are capable of being distributed as a program product in a variety of forms, and that the disclosure applies equally regardless of the particular type of machine or computer-readable media used to actually effect the distribution.
Further examples of machine-readable storage media, machine-readable media, or computer-readable (storage) media include, but are not limited to, recordable type media such as volatile and non-volatile memory devices, floppy and other removable disks, hard disk drives, optical disks (e.g., Compact Disk Read-Only Memory (CD ROMS), Digital Versatile Disks, (DVDs), etc.), among others, and transmission type media such as digital and analog communication links.
The network interface device enables the machine 2800 to mediate data in a network with an entity that is external to the host server, through any known and/or convenient communications protocol supported by the host and the external entity. The network interface device can include one or more of a network adaptor card, a wireless network interface card, a router, an access point, a wireless router, a switch, a multilayer switch, a protocol converter, a gateway, a bridge, bridge router, a hub, a digital media receiver, and/or a repeater.
The network interface device can include a firewall which can, in some embodiments, govern and/or manage permission to access/proxy data in a computer network, and track varying levels of trust between different machines and/or applications. The firewall can be any number of modules having any combination of hardware and/or software components able to enforce a predetermined set of access rights between a particular set of machines and applications, machines and machines, and/or applications and applications, for example, to regulate the flow of traffic and resource sharing between these varying entities. The firewall can additionally manage and/or have access to an access control list which details permissions including for example, the access and operation rights of an object by an individual, a machine, and/or an application, and the circumstances under which the permission rights stand.
Other network security functions can be performed or included in the functions of the firewall, can be, for example, but are not limited to, intrusion-prevention, intrusion detection, next-generation firewall, personal firewall, etc. without deviating from the novel art of this disclosure.
Unless the context clearly requires otherwise, throughout the description and the claims, the words “comprise,” “comprising,” and the like are to be construed in an inclusive sense, as opposed to an exclusive or exhaustive sense; that is to say, in the sense of “including, but not limited to.” As used herein, the terms “connected,” “coupled,” or any variant thereof, means any connection or coupling, either direct or indirect, between two or more elements; the coupling of connection between the elements can be physical, logical, or a combination thereof. Additionally, the words “herein,” “above,” “below,” and words of similar import, when used in this application, shall refer to this application as a whole and not to any particular portions of this application. Where the context permits, words in the above Detailed Description using the singular or plural number can also include the plural or singular number respectively. The word “or,” in reference to a list of two or more items, covers all of the following interpretations of the word: any of the items in the list, all of the items in the list, and any combination of the items in the list.
The above detailed description of embodiments of the disclosure is not intended to be exhaustive or to limit the teachings to the precise form disclosed above. While specific embodiments of, and examples for, the disclosure are described above for illustrative purposes, various equivalent modifications are possible within the scope of the disclosure, as those skilled in the relevant art will recognize. For example, while processes or blocks are presented in a given order, alternative embodiments can perform routines having steps, or employ systems having blocks, in a different order, and some processes or blocks can be deleted, moved, added, subdivided, combined, and/or modified to provide alternative or subcombinations. Each of these processes or blocks can be implemented in a variety of different ways. Also, while processes or blocks are at times shown as being performed in series, these processes or blocks can instead be performed in parallel, or can be performed at different times. Further, any specific numbers noted herein are only examples: alternative implementations can employ differing values or ranges.
The teachings of the disclosure provided herein can be applied to other systems, not necessarily the system described above. The elements and acts of the various embodiments described above can be combined to provide further embodiments.
Any patents and applications and other references noted above, including any that can be listed in accompanying filing papers, are incorporated herein by reference. Aspects of the disclosure can be modified, if necessary, to employ the systems, functions, and concepts of the various references described above to provide yet further embodiments of the disclosure.
These and other changes can be made to the disclosure in light of the above Detailed Description. While the above description describes certain embodiments of the disclosure, and describes the best mode contemplated, no matter how detailed the above appears in text, the teachings can be practiced in many ways. Details of the system can vary considerably in its implementation details, while still being encompassed by the subject matter disclosed herein. As noted above, particular terminology used when describing certain features or aspects of the disclosure should not be taken to imply that the terminology is being redefined herein to be restricted to any specific characteristics, features, or aspects of the disclosure with which that terminology is associated. In general, the terms used in the following claims should not be construed to limit the disclosure to the specific embodiments disclosed in the specification, unless the above Detailed Description section explicitly defines such terms. Accordingly, the actual scope of the disclosure encompasses not only the disclosed embodiments, but also all equivalent ways of practicing or implementing the disclosure under the claims.
While certain aspects of the disclosure are presented below in certain claim forms, the inventors contemplate the various aspects of the disclosure in any number of claim forms. For example, while only one aspect of the disclosure is recited as a means-plus-function claim under 35 U.S.C. §112, ¶6, other aspects can likewise be embodied as a means-plus-function claim, or in other forms, such as being embodied in a computer-readable medium. (Any claim intended to be treated under 35 U.S.C. §112, ¶6 begins with the words “means for”.) Accordingly, the applicant reserves the right to add additional claims after filing the application to pursue such additional claim forms for other aspects of the disclosure.
This application is entitled to the benefit of and/or the right of priority to U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/748,399, entitled “HANDLING ACTION LOG FRAMEWORK RACE CONDITIONS FOR A SYNCHRONIZATION CLIENT TO A CLOUD-BASED ENVIRONMENT”, filed Jan. 2, 2013; and to U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/750,474, entitled “FILE SYSTEM EVENT MONITOR AND EVENT FILTER PIPELINE FOR A CLOUD-BASED PLATFORM”, filed Jan. 9, 2013; both of which are hereby incorporated by reference in their entireties. This application is therefore entitled to an effective filing date of Jan. 2, 2013.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 858619 | O'Farrell | Jul 1907 | A |
| 5043876 | Terry | Aug 1991 | A |
| 5748735 | Ganesan | May 1998 | A |
| 5774717 | Porcaro | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5787175 | Carter | Jul 1998 | A |
| 5799320 | Klug | Aug 1998 | A |
| 5848415 | Guck | Dec 1998 | A |
| 5864870 | Guck | Jan 1999 | A |
| 5999908 | Abelow | Dec 1999 | A |
| 6034621 | Kaufman | Mar 2000 | A |
| 6055543 | Christensen et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
| 6073161 | DeBoskey et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
| 6098078 | Gehani et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6226618 | Downs et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6233600 | Salas et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6260040 | Kauffman et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6279109 | Brundridge | Aug 2001 | B1 |
| 6289345 | Yasue | Sep 2001 | B1 |
| 6292803 | Richardson et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
| 6336124 | Alam et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
| 6342906 | Kumar et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
| 6345386 | Delo et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
| 6370543 | Hoffert et al. | Apr 2002 | B2 |
| 6374260 | Hoffert et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
| 6385606 | Inohara et al. | May 2002 | B2 |
| 6396593 | Laverty et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
| 6441641 | Pang et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
| 6446091 | Noren et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
| 6449622 | LaRue et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
| 6515681 | Knight | Feb 2003 | B1 |
| 6539381 | Prasad et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
| 6584466 | Serbinis et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
| 6636872 | Heath et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
| 6636897 | Sherman et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
| 6654737 | Nunez | Nov 2003 | B1 |
| 6662186 | Esquibel et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
| 6687878 | Eintracht et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
| 6714968 | Prust | Mar 2004 | B1 |
| 6735623 | Prust | May 2004 | B1 |
| 6742181 | Koike et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
| 6760721 | Chasen et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
| 6947162 | Rosenberg et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
| 6952724 | Prust | Oct 2005 | B2 |
| 6996768 | Elo et al. | Feb 2006 | B1 |
| 7003667 | Slick et al. | Feb 2006 | B1 |
| 7010752 | Ly | Mar 2006 | B2 |
| 7020697 | Goodman et al. | Mar 2006 | B1 |
| 7039806 | Friedman et al. | May 2006 | B1 |
| 7069393 | Miyata et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
| 7080104 | Ring et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
| 7130831 | Howard et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
| 7133834 | Abelow | Nov 2006 | B1 |
| 7143136 | Drenan et al. | Nov 2006 | B1 |
| 7149787 | Mutalik et al. | Dec 2006 | B1 |
| 7152182 | Ji et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
| 7155483 | Friend et al. | Dec 2006 | B1 |
| 7165107 | Pouyoul et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
| 7171468 | Yeung et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
| 7178021 | Hanna et al. | Feb 2007 | B1 |
| 7222078 | Abelow | May 2007 | B2 |
| 7275244 | Bell et al. | Sep 2007 | B1 |
| 7296025 | Kung et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
| 7346778 | Guiter et al. | Mar 2008 | B1 |
| 7353252 | Yang et al. | Apr 2008 | B1 |
| 7362868 | Madoukh et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
| 7363330 | Ellman et al. | Apr 2008 | B1 |
| 7370269 | Prabhu et al. | May 2008 | B1 |
| 7380120 | Garcia | May 2008 | B1 |
| 7386535 | Kalucha et al. | Jun 2008 | B1 |
| 7401117 | Dan et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
| 7543000 | Castro et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
| 7581221 | Lai et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
| 7620565 | Abelow | Nov 2009 | B2 |
| 7647559 | Yozell-Epstein et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
| 7650367 | Arruza | Jan 2010 | B2 |
| 7653668 | Shelat et al. | Jan 2010 | B1 |
| 7661088 | Burke | Feb 2010 | B2 |
| 7665093 | Maybee et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
| 7676542 | Moser et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
| 7698363 | Dan et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
| 7734600 | Wise et al. | Jun 2010 | B1 |
| 7739411 | Messer et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
| 7756843 | Palmer | Jul 2010 | B1 |
| 7774412 | Schnepel | Aug 2010 | B1 |
| 7814426 | Huesken et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
| 7886295 | Burger et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
| 7890964 | Vogler-Ivashchanka et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
| 7937663 | Parker et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
| 7958353 | Matsuzaki et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
| 7958453 | Taing | Jun 2011 | B1 |
| 7979296 | Kruse et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
| 7996374 | Jones et al. | Aug 2011 | B1 |
| 8027976 | Ding et al. | Sep 2011 | B1 |
| RE42904 | Stephens, Jr. | Nov 2011 | E |
| 8065739 | Bruening et al. | Nov 2011 | B1 |
| 8090361 | Hagan | Jan 2012 | B2 |
| 8103662 | Eagan et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
| 8117261 | Briere et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
| 8140513 | Ghods et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
| 8151183 | Chen et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
| 8185830 | Saha et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
| 8200582 | Zhu | Jun 2012 | B1 |
| 8201230 | Day et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
| 8214747 | Yankovich et al. | Jul 2012 | B1 |
| 8230348 | Peters et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
| 8239918 | Cohen | Aug 2012 | B1 |
| 8326814 | Ghods et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
| 8347276 | Schadow | Jan 2013 | B2 |
| 8358701 | Chou et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
| 8370803 | Holler et al. | Feb 2013 | B1 |
| 8429540 | Yankovich et al. | Apr 2013 | B1 |
| 8447820 | Gay | May 2013 | B1 |
| 8464161 | Giles et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
| 8473775 | Helmick et al. | Jun 2013 | B1 |
| 8515902 | Savage | Aug 2013 | B2 |
| 8527549 | Cidon | Sep 2013 | B2 |
| 8549066 | Donahue et al. | Oct 2013 | B1 |
| 8549511 | Seki et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
| 8582777 | Urivskiy et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
| 8583619 | Ghods et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
| 8650498 | Mihovilovic | Feb 2014 | B1 |
| 8719445 | Ko | May 2014 | B2 |
| 8719810 | Oh | May 2014 | B2 |
| 8745267 | Luecke et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
| 8782637 | Khalid | Jul 2014 | B2 |
| 8825597 | Houston et al. | Sep 2014 | B1 |
| 8849955 | Prahlad et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
| 8868574 | Kiang et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
| 8892679 | Destagnol et al. | Nov 2014 | B1 |
| 8914856 | Velummylum et al. | Dec 2014 | B1 |
| 8914900 | Smith et al. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
| 8918387 | Sokolov | Dec 2014 | B1 |
| 8949939 | Peddada | Feb 2015 | B2 |
| 8959579 | Barton et al. | Feb 2015 | B2 |
| 8966062 | Giese et al. | Feb 2015 | B1 |
| 8990307 | Barreto et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
| 8990955 | Hymel et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
| 9015248 | Barreto et al. | Apr 2015 | B2 |
| 9054919 | Kiang et al. | Jun 2015 | B2 |
| 20010027492 | Gupta | Oct 2001 | A1 |
| 20020029218 | Bentley et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
| 20020091738 | Rohrabaugh et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
| 20020099772 | Deshpande et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
| 20020116544 | Barnard et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
| 20020133509 | Johnston et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
| 20020147770 | Tang | Oct 2002 | A1 |
| 20020194177 | Sherman et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
| 20030041095 | Konda et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
| 20030084306 | Abburi et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
| 20030093404 | Bader et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
| 20030108052 | Inoue et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
| 20030110264 | Whidby et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
| 20030115326 | Verma et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
| 20030135536 | Lyons | Jul 2003 | A1 |
| 20030135565 | Estrada | Jul 2003 | A1 |
| 20030154306 | Perry | Aug 2003 | A1 |
| 20030204490 | Kasriel | Oct 2003 | A1 |
| 20030217171 | Von Stuermer et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
| 20030228015 | Futa et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
| 20040003104 | Boskovic et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
| 20040021686 | Barberis | Feb 2004 | A1 |
| 20040076187 | Peled | Apr 2004 | A1 |
| 20040088647 | Miller et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
| 20040098361 | Peng | May 2004 | A1 |
| 20040103147 | Flesher et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
| 20040111415 | Scardino et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
| 20040117438 | Considine et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
| 20040122949 | Zmudzinski et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
| 20040128359 | Horvitz et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
| 20040162836 | Aronoff et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
| 20040177138 | Salle et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
| 20040181579 | Huck et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
| 20040196307 | Zak et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
| 20040201604 | Kraenzel et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
| 20040218214 | Kihara et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
| 20040230624 | Frolund et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
| 20040230652 | Estrada et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
| 20040246532 | Inada | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20040260977 | Ji et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20040267836 | Armangau et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20050005276 | Morgan | Jan 2005 | A1 |
| 20050010860 | Weiss et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
| 20050022175 | Sliger et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
| 20050022229 | Gabriel et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
| 20050028006 | Leser et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
| 20050033777 | Moraes | Feb 2005 | A1 |
| 20050038997 | Kojima et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
| 20050050228 | Perham et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050055306 | Miller et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050063083 | Dart et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050097225 | Glatt et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
| 20050097434 | Storisteanu | May 2005 | A1 |
| 20050102328 | Ring et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
| 20050108406 | Lee et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
| 20050114305 | Haynes et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
| 20050114378 | Elien et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
| 20050138118 | Banatwala et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050172284 | Dandekar et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
| 20050182966 | Pham et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
| 20050198299 | Beck et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050198452 | Watanabe | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050234864 | Shapiro | Oct 2005 | A1 |
| 20050234943 | Clarke | Oct 2005 | A1 |
| 20050261933 | Magnuson | Nov 2005 | A1 |
| 20060005163 | Huesken et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
| 20060026502 | Dutta | Feb 2006 | A1 |
| 20060026535 | Hotelling et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
| 20060036568 | Moore et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
| 20060041603 | Paterson et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
| 20060041752 | Tuvell et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
| 20060047804 | Fredricksen et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
| 20060053088 | Ali et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
| 20060053380 | Spataro et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
| 20060070083 | Brunswig et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
| 20060075071 | Gillette | Apr 2006 | A1 |
| 20060117247 | Fite et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20060123062 | Bobbitt et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20060133340 | Rybak et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20060168550 | Muller et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
| 20060173952 | Coyle | Aug 2006 | A1 |
| 20060174051 | Lordi et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
| 20060174054 | Matsuki | Aug 2006 | A1 |
| 20060179070 | George et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
| 20060179309 | Cross et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
| 20060242204 | Karas et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
| 20060242206 | Brezak et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
| 20060259524 | Horton | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20060265719 | Astl et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20060271510 | Harward et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20060288043 | Novak et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
| 20070016680 | Burd et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
| 20070028291 | Brennan et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
| 20070038934 | Fellman | Feb 2007 | A1 |
| 20070067349 | Jhaveri et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070079242 | Jolley et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
| 20070100830 | Beedubail et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070115845 | Hochwarth et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070118598 | Bedi et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070124460 | McMullen et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070124737 | Wensley et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070124781 | Casey et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070126635 | Houri | Jun 2007 | A1 |
| 20070130143 | Zhang et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
| 20070130163 | Perez et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
| 20070162610 | Un et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
| 20070179993 | Arruza | Aug 2007 | A1 |
| 20070198609 | Black et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
| 20070208878 | Barnes-Leon et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
| 20070214180 | Crawford | Sep 2007 | A1 |
| 20070220016 | Estrada et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
| 20070220590 | Rasmussen et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
| 20070240057 | Satterfield et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
| 20070250762 | Mansfield | Oct 2007 | A1 |
| 20070256065 | Heishi et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
| 20070266304 | Fletcher et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
| 20070282848 | Kiilerich et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
| 20070283443 | McPherson et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
| 20070288290 | Motoyama et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
| 20080005135 | Muthukrishnan et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
| 20080005195 | Li | Jan 2008 | A1 |
| 20080016146 | Gan et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
| 20080021959 | Naghi et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
| 20080028323 | Rosen et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
| 20080040173 | Aleong et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
| 20080040503 | Kleks et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
| 20080040560 | Hall et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
| 20080046828 | Bibliowicz et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
| 20080059656 | Saliba et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
| 20080063210 | Goodman et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
| 20080065881 | Dawson et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
| 20080077631 | Petri | Mar 2008 | A1 |
| 20080091763 | Devonshire et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
| 20080091790 | Beck | Apr 2008 | A1 |
| 20080104277 | Tian | May 2008 | A1 |
| 20080114720 | Smith et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
| 20080133674 | Knauerhase et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
| 20080140732 | Wilson et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
| 20080147790 | Malaney et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
| 20080151817 | Fitchett et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
| 20080154873 | Redlich et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
| 20080182628 | Lee et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
| 20080183467 | Yuan et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
| 20080184130 | Tien et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
| 20080194239 | Hagan | Aug 2008 | A1 |
| 20080195673 | Hamel | Aug 2008 | A1 |
| 20080215883 | Fok et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
| 20080222654 | Xu et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
| 20080243855 | Prahlad et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
| 20080250333 | Reeves et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
| 20080250348 | Alimpich et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
| 20080263099 | Brady-Kalnay et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
| 20080271095 | Shafton | Oct 2008 | A1 |
| 20080276158 | Lim et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
| 20080281972 | Gupta | Nov 2008 | A1 |
| 20080294899 | Gazzetta et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
| 20090015864 | Hasegawa | Jan 2009 | A1 |
| 20090019093 | Brodersen et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
| 20090019426 | Baeumer et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
| 20090030710 | Levine | Jan 2009 | A1 |
| 20090043848 | Kordun | Feb 2009 | A1 |
| 20090044128 | Baumgarten et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
| 20090049131 | Lyle et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
| 20090119322 | Mills et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
| 20090125469 | McDonald et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
| 20090132651 | Roger et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
| 20090138808 | Moromisato et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
| 20090150417 | Ghods et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
| 20090150627 | Benhase et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
| 20090158142 | Arthursson et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
| 20090164438 | Delacruz | Jun 2009 | A1 |
| 20090171983 | Samji et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
| 20090172201 | Carmel | Jul 2009 | A1 |
| 20090177754 | Brezina et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
| 20090193107 | Srinivasan et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
| 20090193345 | Wensley et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
| 20090198772 | Kim et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
| 20090210459 | Nair et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
| 20090214115 | Kimura et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
| 20090235167 | Boyer et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
| 20090235181 | Saliba et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
| 20090235189 | Aybes et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
| 20090249224 | Davis et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
| 20090254589 | Nair et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
| 20090260060 | Smith et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
| 20090265430 | Bechtel et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
| 20090271708 | Peters et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
| 20090276771 | Nickolov et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
| 20090282212 | Peterson | Nov 2009 | A1 |
| 20090282483 | Bennett | Nov 2009 | A1 |
| 20090300356 | Crandell | Dec 2009 | A1 |
| 20090300527 | Malcolm et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
| 20090327358 | Lukiyanov et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
| 20090327405 | Fitzgerald et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
| 20090327961 | De Vorchik et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
| 20100011292 | Marinkovich et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
| 20100011447 | Jothimani | Jan 2010 | A1 |
| 20100017262 | Iyer et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
| 20100017619 | Errico | Jan 2010 | A1 |
| 20100036929 | Scherpa et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
| 20100042720 | Stienhans et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
| 20100057560 | Skudlark et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
| 20100057785 | Khosravy et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
| 20100076946 | Barker et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
| 20100082534 | Sagar et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
| 20100082634 | Leban | Apr 2010 | A1 |
| 20100083136 | Komine et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
| 20100088150 | Mazhar et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
| 20100092126 | Kaliszek et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
| 20100093310 | Gbadegesin et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
| 20100107225 | Spencer et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
| 20100122184 | Vonog et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
| 20100131868 | Chawla et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
| 20100151431 | Miller | Jun 2010 | A1 |
| 20100153835 | Xiong et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
| 20100162365 | Del Real | Jun 2010 | A1 |
| 20100162374 | Nair | Jun 2010 | A1 |
| 20100179940 | Gilder et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
| 20100185463 | Noland et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
| 20100185932 | Coffman et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
| 20100191689 | Cortes et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
| 20100198783 | Wang et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
| 20100198871 | Stiegler et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
| 20100198944 | Ho et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
| 20100205392 | Schnapp | Aug 2010 | A1 |
| 20100205537 | Knighton et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
| 20100212010 | Stringer et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
| 20100218237 | Ferris et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
| 20100223378 | Wei | Sep 2010 | A1 |
| 20100229085 | Nelson et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
| 20100235526 | Carter et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
| 20100235539 | Carter et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
| 20100241611 | Zuber | Sep 2010 | A1 |
| 20100241972 | Spataro et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
| 20100242028 | Weigert | Sep 2010 | A1 |
| 20100250120 | Waupotitsch et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
| 20100251340 | Martin et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
| 20100257457 | De Goes | Oct 2010 | A1 |
| 20100262582 | Garcia-Ascanio et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
| 20100267588 | Nelson et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
| 20100274765 | Murphy et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
| 20100274772 | Samuels | Oct 2010 | A1 |
| 20100281118 | Donahue et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
| 20100290623 | Banks et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
| 20100306379 | Ferris | Dec 2010 | A1 |
| 20100312615 | Murphy et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
| 20100318893 | Matthews et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
| 20100322252 | Suganthi et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
| 20100325155 | Skinner et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
| 20100325527 | Estrada et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
| 20100325559 | Westerinen et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
| 20100325655 | Perez | Dec 2010 | A1 |
| 20100332401 | Prahlad et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
| 20100332962 | Hammer et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
| 20100333116 | Prahlad et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
| 20110001763 | Murakami | Jan 2011 | A1 |
| 20110016409 | Grosz et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
| 20110022559 | Andersen et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
| 20110022812 | van der Linden et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
| 20110029883 | Lussier et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
| 20110040812 | Phillips | Feb 2011 | A1 |
| 20110041083 | Gabai et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
| 20110047413 | McGill et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
| 20110047484 | Mount et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
| 20110052155 | Desmarais et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
| 20110054968 | Galaviz | Mar 2011 | A1 |
| 20110055299 | Phillips | Mar 2011 | A1 |
| 20110055721 | Jain et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
| 20110061045 | Phillips | Mar 2011 | A1 |
| 20110061046 | Phillips | Mar 2011 | A1 |
| 20110065082 | Gal et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
| 20110066951 | Ward-Karet et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
| 20110078243 | Carpenter et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
| 20110083167 | Carpenter et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
| 20110093567 | Jeon et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
| 20110099006 | Sundararaman et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
| 20110107088 | Eng et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
| 20110107205 | Chow et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
| 20110113320 | Neff et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
| 20110119313 | Sung et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
| 20110125847 | Cocheu et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
| 20110131299 | Sardary | Jun 2011 | A1 |
| 20110137991 | Russell | Jun 2011 | A1 |
| 20110142410 | Ishii | Jun 2011 | A1 |
| 20110145187 | Himmelsbach et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
| 20110145282 | Moore et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
| 20110145589 | Camenisch et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
| 20110145744 | Haynes et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
| 20110154180 | Evanitsky et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
| 20110161289 | Pei et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
| 20110167125 | Achlioptas | Jul 2011 | A1 |
| 20110167353 | Grosz et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
| 20110167435 | Fang | Jul 2011 | A1 |
| 20110185292 | Chawla et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
| 20110202424 | Chun et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
| 20110202599 | Yuan et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
| 20110208958 | Stuedi et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
| 20110209064 | Jorgensen et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
| 20110213765 | Cui et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
| 20110219419 | Reisman | Sep 2011 | A1 |
| 20110225417 | Maharajh et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
| 20110238458 | Purcell et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
| 20110238621 | Agrawal | Sep 2011 | A1 |
| 20110238759 | Spataro et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
| 20110239135 | Spataro et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
| 20110246294 | Robb et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
| 20110246950 | Luna et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
| 20110252071 | Cidon | Oct 2011 | A1 |
| 20110252312 | Lemonik et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
| 20110252320 | Arrasvuori et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
| 20110252339 | Lemonik et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
| 20110258461 | Bates | Oct 2011 | A1 |
| 20110258561 | Ladouceur et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
| 20110277027 | Hayton et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
| 20110282710 | Akkiraju et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
| 20110289433 | Whalin et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
| 20110296022 | Ferris et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
| 20110313803 | Friend et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
| 20110314145 | Raleigh et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
| 20110320197 | Conejero et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
| 20110320936 | Mohan et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
| 20120036370 | Lim et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
| 20120057696 | Chew | Mar 2012 | A1 |
| 20120064879 | Panei | Mar 2012 | A1 |
| 20120072436 | Pierre et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
| 20120079095 | Evans et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
| 20120089610 | Agrawal et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
| 20120089659 | Halevi et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
| 20120089710 | Rakowski et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
| 20120096521 | Peddada | Apr 2012 | A1 |
| 20120101995 | Agetsuma et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
| 20120110005 | Kuo et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
| 20120110436 | Adler, III et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
| 20120110443 | Lemonik et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
| 20120117626 | Yates et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
| 20120124306 | Abercrombie et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
| 20120124547 | Halbedel | May 2012 | A1 |
| 20120130900 | Tang et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
| 20120134491 | Liu | May 2012 | A1 |
| 20120136936 | Quintuna | May 2012 | A1 |
| 20120143825 | Boehm | Jun 2012 | A1 |
| 20120144283 | Hill et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
| 20120150888 | Hyatt et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
| 20120151265 | Bender et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
| 20120151551 | Readshaw et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
| 20120158908 | Luna et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
| 20120159178 | Lin et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
| 20120159310 | Chang et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
| 20120166516 | Simmons et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
| 20120173612 | Vegesna-Venkata et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
| 20120173625 | Berger | Jul 2012 | A1 |
| 20120179802 | Narasimhan et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
| 20120179981 | Whalin et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
| 20120185355 | Kilroy | Jul 2012 | A1 |
| 20120185913 | Martinez et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
| 20120192055 | Antebi et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
| 20120192086 | Ghods et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
| 20120203670 | Piersol | Aug 2012 | A1 |
| 20120203908 | Beaty et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
| 20120204032 | Wilkins et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
| 20120214444 | McBride et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
| 20120218885 | Abel et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
| 20120221789 | Felter | Aug 2012 | A1 |
| 20120224691 | Purohit | Sep 2012 | A1 |
| 20120226767 | Luna et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
| 20120233155 | Gallmeier et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
| 20120233205 | McDermott | Sep 2012 | A1 |
| 20120233543 | Vagell et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
| 20120240061 | Hillenius et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
| 20120240183 | Sinha | Sep 2012 | A1 |
| 20120257249 | Natarajan | Oct 2012 | A1 |
| 20120259964 | Lin et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
| 20120263166 | Cho et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
| 20120266203 | Elhadad et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
| 20120284290 | Keebler et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
| 20120284638 | Cutler et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
| 20120284664 | Zhao | Nov 2012 | A1 |
| 20120291011 | Quine | Nov 2012 | A1 |
| 20120296790 | Robb | Nov 2012 | A1 |
| 20120309540 | Holme et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
| 20120311157 | Erickson et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
| 20120317239 | Mulder et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
| 20120317487 | Lieb et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
| 20120328259 | Seibert, Jr. et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
| 20120331177 | Jensen | Dec 2012 | A1 |
| 20120331441 | Adamson | Dec 2012 | A1 |
| 20130007245 | Malik et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
| 20130007471 | Grab et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
| 20130007894 | Dang et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
| 20130013560 | Goldberg et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
| 20130014023 | Lee et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
| 20130042106 | Persaud et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
| 20130054634 | Chakraborty et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
| 20130055127 | Saito et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
| 20130067232 | Cheung et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
| 20130073403 | Tuchman et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
| 20130073621 | Waddoups et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
| 20130080765 | Mohanty et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
| 20130080919 | Kiang et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
| 20130110565 | Means, Jr. et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
| 20130117337 | Dunham | May 2013 | A1 |
| 20130117376 | Filman et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
| 20130124638 | Barreto et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
| 20130124984 | Kuspa | May 2013 | A1 |
| 20130138608 | Smith | May 2013 | A1 |
| 20130138615 | Gupta et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
| 20130151690 | Shah et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
| 20130159411 | Bowen | Jun 2013 | A1 |
| 20130163289 | Kim et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
| 20130167253 | Seleznev et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
| 20130185347 | Romano | Jul 2013 | A1 |
| 20130185558 | Seibert et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
| 20130191339 | Haden et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
| 20130198600 | Lockhart et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
| 20130212067 | Piasecki et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
| 20130212486 | Joshi et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
| 20130218978 | Weinstein et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
| 20130226876 | Gati et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
| 20130227522 | Lerum et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
| 20130239049 | Perrodin et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
| 20130246901 | Massand | Sep 2013 | A1 |
| 20130246932 | Zaveri et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
| 20130254699 | Bashir et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
| 20130262210 | Savage et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
| 20130262862 | Hartley | Oct 2013 | A1 |
| 20130268480 | Dorman | Oct 2013 | A1 |
| 20130268491 | Chung et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
| 20130275398 | Dorman et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
| 20130275429 | York et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
| 20130275509 | Micucci | Oct 2013 | A1 |
| 20130282830 | Besen | Oct 2013 | A1 |
| 20130304694 | Barreto et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
| 20130305039 | Gauda | Nov 2013 | A1 |
| 20130326344 | Masselle et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
| 20140006357 | Davis et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
| 20140006465 | Davis et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
| 20140007205 | Oikonomou | Jan 2014 | A1 |
| 20140013112 | Cidon et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
| 20140019497 | Cidon et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
| 20140019498 | Cidon et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
| 20140032489 | Hebbar et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
| 20140032616 | Nack | Jan 2014 | A1 |
| 20140033277 | Xiao et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
| 20140033291 | Liu | Jan 2014 | A1 |
| 20140033324 | Kiang et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
| 20140040182 | Gilder et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
| 20140047509 | Bhogal et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
| 20140052939 | Tseng et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
| 20140059002 | Lockhart et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
| 20140059217 | Pizurica | Feb 2014 | A1 |
| 20140068589 | Barak | Mar 2014 | A1 |
| 20140074629 | Rathod | Mar 2014 | A1 |
| 20140082071 | Rexer | Mar 2014 | A1 |
| 20140150023 | Gudorf et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
| 20140156373 | Roberts et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
| 20140172595 | Beddow et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
| 20140172783 | Suzuki et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
| 20140172799 | Dorman | Jun 2014 | A1 |
| 20140195485 | Dorman | Jul 2014 | A1 |
| 20140201138 | Dorman et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
| 20140201145 | Dorman et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
| 20140244600 | Schmidt et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
| 20140280605 | Zhang | Sep 2014 | A1 |
| 20140337291 | Dorman et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
| 20140337491 | Barreto et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
| 20140344456 | Buzbee et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
| 20140359286 | Wen et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
| 20140372376 | Smith et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
| 20140379647 | Smith et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
| 20150019723 | Kweon et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
| 20150039556 | Mackenzie et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
| 20150186668 | Whaley et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
| 20150237406 | Ochoa et al. | Aug 2015 | A1 |
| 20150339113 | Dorman et al. | Nov 2015 | A1 |
| 20160065672 | Savage et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 2724521 | Nov 2009 | CA |
| 101997924 | Mar 2011 | CN |
| 102264063 | Nov 2011 | CN |
| 0348614 | Jan 1990 | EP |
| 0921661 | Jun 1999 | EP |
| 1349088 | Oct 2003 | EP |
| 1528746 | May 2005 | EP |
| 1933242 | Jun 2008 | EP |
| 2372574 | Oct 2011 | EP |
| 2610776 | Jul 2013 | EP |
| 2453924 | Apr 2009 | GB |
| 2471282 | Dec 2010 | GB |
| 09-101937 | Apr 1997 | JP |
| 11-025059 | Jan 1999 | JP |
| 2003273912 | Sep 2003 | JP |
| 2004310272 | Nov 2004 | JP |
| 09-269925 | Oct 2007 | JP |
| 2008250944 | Oct 2008 | JP |
| 20020017444 | Mar 2002 | KR |
| 20040028036 | Apr 2004 | KR |
| 20050017674 | Feb 2005 | KR |
| 20060070306 | Jun 2006 | KR |
| 20060114871 | Nov 2006 | KR |
| 20070043353 | Apr 2007 | KR |
| 20070100477 | Oct 2007 | KR |
| 20100118836 | Nov 2010 | KR |
| 20110074096 | Jun 2011 | KR |
| 20110076831 | Jul 2011 | KR |
| WO-0007104 | Feb 2000 | WO |
| WO-2002019128 | Mar 2002 | WO |
| WO-2004097681 | Nov 2004 | WO |
| WO-2006028850 | Mar 2006 | WO |
| WO-2007024438 | Mar 2007 | WO |
| WO-2007035637 | Mar 2007 | WO |
| WO-2007113573 | Oct 2007 | WO |
| WO-2008011142 | Jan 2008 | WO |
| WO-2008076520 | Jun 2008 | WO |
| WO-2011109416 | Sep 2011 | WO |
| WO-2012167272 | Dec 2012 | WO |
| WO-2013009328 | Jan 2013 | WO |
| WO-2013013217 | Jan 2013 | WO |
| WO-2013041763 | Mar 2013 | WO |
| WO-2013166520 | Nov 2013 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| “Conceptboard”, One-Step Solution for Online Collaboration, retrieved from websites http://conceptboard.com and https://www.youtube.com/user/ConceptboardApp?feature=watch, printed on Jun. 13, 2013, 9 pages. |
| “How-to Geek, How to Sync Specific Folders With Dropbox,” downloaded from the internet http://www.howtogeek.com, Apr. 23, 2013, 5 pages. |
| “Microsoft Office SharePoint 2007 User Guide,” Feb. 16, 2010, pp. 1-48. |
| “PaperPort Professional 14,” PC Mag. Com review, published Feb. 2012, Ziff Davis, Inc., 8 pages. |
| “PaperPort,” Wikipedia article (old revision), published May 19, 2012, Wikipedia Foundation, 2 pages. |
| “Quickoffice Enhances Android Mobile office Application for Improved Productivity on latest Smartphone and Table Devices,” QuickOffice Press Release, Nov. 21, 2011, QuickOffice Inc., 2 pages. |
| “QuickOffice,” Wikipedia Article (old revision), published May 9, 2012, Wikipedia Foundation, 2 pages. |
| “Understanding Metadata,” National Information Standards Organization, NISO Press, 2004, 20 pages. |
| Cisco, “FTP Load Balancing on ACE in Routed Mode Configuration Example,” DocWiki, Jun. 2011, 7 pages. |
| Conner, “Google Apps: The Missing Manual,” published by O'Reilly Media, May 27, 2008, 24 pages. |
| Exam Report for EP13158415.3, Applicant: Box, Inc. Mailed Jun. 4, 2013, 8 pages. |
| Exam Report for EP13168784.0, Applicant: Box, Inc. Mailed Nov. 21, 2013, 7 pages. |
| Exam Report for GB1300188.8, Applicant: Box, Inc. Mailed May 31, 2013, 8 pages. |
| Exam Report for GB1306011.6, Applicant: Box, Inc. Mailed Apr. 18, 2013, 8 pages. |
| Exam Report for GB1309209.3, Applicant: Box, Inc. Mailed Oct. 30, 2013, 11 pages. |
| Exam Report for GB1310666.1, Applicant: Box, Inc. Mailed Aug. 30, 2013, 10 pages. |
| Exam Report for GB1311417.8, Applicant: Box, Inc. Mailed Dec. 20, 2013, 5 pages. |
| Exam Report for GB1312095.1, Applicant: Box, Inc. Mailed Dec. 12, 2013, 7 pages. |
| Exam Report for GB1312874.9, Applicant: Box, Inc. Mailed Dec. 20, 2013, 11 pages. |
| Exam Report for GB1313559.5, Applicant: Box, Inc., Mailed Aug. 22, 2013, 19 pages. |
| Exam Report for GB1316532.9, Applicant: Box, Inc. Mailed Oct. 31, 2013, 10 pages. |
| Exam Report for GB1316533.7, Applicant: Box, Inc. Mailed Oct. 8, 2013, 9 pages. |
| Exam Report for GB1316971.9, Applicant: Box, Inc. Mailed Nov. 26, 2013, 10 pages. |
| Exam Report for GB1317600.3, Applicant: Box, Inc. Mailed Nov. 21, 2013, 8 pages. |
| Exam Report for GB1318373.6, Applicant: Box, Inc. Mailed Dec. 17, 2013, 4 pages. |
| Exam Report for GB1320902.8, Applicant: Box, Inc. Mailed Dec. 20, 2013, 4 pages. |
| Gedymin, “Cloud computing with an emphasis on Google App Engine,” Master Final Project, Sep. 2011, 146 pages. |
| Google Docs, http://web.Archive.org/web/20100413105758/http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Google—docs, Apr. 13, 2010, 6 pages. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2008/012973 dated Apr. 30, 2009, pp. 1-11. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2011/039126 mailed on Oct. 6, 2011, pp. 1-13. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2011/041308 Mailed Jul. 2, 2012, pp. 1-16. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2011/056472 mailed on Jun. 22, 2012, pp. 1-12. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2011/057938, Applicant: Box, Inc., Mailed Mar. 29, 2013, 10 pages. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2011/060875 Mailed Oct. 30, 2012, pp. 1-10. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2012/056955, Applicant: Box, Inc., Mailed Mar. 27, 2013, pp. 1-11. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2012/063041, Applicant: Box, Inc., Mailed Mar. 29, 2013, 12 pages. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2012/065617, Applicant: Box, Inc., Mailed Mar. 29, 2013, 9 pages. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2012/067126, Applicant: Box, Inc., Mailed Mar. 29, 2013, 10 pages. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2012/070366, Applicant: Box, Inc., Mailed Apr. 24, 2013, 10 pages. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2013/020267, Applicant: Box, Inc., Mailed May 7, 2013, 10 pages. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2013/023889, Applicant: Box, Inc., Mailed Jun. 24, 2013, 13 pages. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2013/029520, Applicant: Box, Inc., Mailed Jun. 26, 2013, 10 pages. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2013/034662, Applicant: Box, Inc., Mailed May 31, 2013, 10 pages. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2013/035404, Applicant: Box, Inc., Mailed Jun. 26, 2013, 13 pages. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2013/039782, Applicant: Box, Inc., Mailed Aug. 28, 2013, 15 pages. |
| Internet Forums, http://web.archive.org/web/20100528195550/http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet—forums, Wikipedia, May 30, 2010, pp. 1-20. |
| Langfeld L. et al., “Microsoft SharePoint 2003 Unleashed,” Chapters 11 and 15, Jun. 2004, pp. 403-404, 557-561, 578-581. |
| Lars, “35 Very Useful Online Tools for Improving your project Management and Team Collaboration,” Apr. 31, 2010, tripwiremagazine.com, pp. 1-32. |
| Palmer, “Load Balancing Ftp Servers,” BlogNav, Oct. 2008, 2 pages. |
| Parr, “Google Docs Improves Commenting, Adds E-mail Notifications,” Apr. 16, 2011, mashable.com, pp. 1-6. |
| Partial International Search Report for PCT/US2011/041308 dated Feb. 27, 2012, pp. 1- 2. |
| Patent Court Document of Approved Judgment for GB0602349.3 and GB0623571.7; Mar. 3, 2009, 17 pages. |
| Supplementary European Search Report European Application No. EP 08 85 8563 dated Jun. 20, 2011 pp. 1-5. |
| Wayback, “Wayback machine,” Wayback, Jun. 1, 2011, 1 page. |
| Wiki, http://web.archive.org/web/20100213004936/http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wiki, Feb. 13, 2010, pp. 1-16. |
| Yahoo! Groups, http://web.archive.org/web/20090320101529/http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yahoo!—Groups, Wikipedia, Mar. 20, 2009, pp. 1-6. |
| “Average Conversion Time for a D60 Raw file?” http://www.dpreview.com, Jul. 22, 2002, 4 pages. |
| “Revolving sync conflicts; frequently asked questions,” Microsoft Tech Support, Jul. 16, 2012, retrieved from the Internet: http://web.archive.org/web, 2 pages. |
| “Troubleshoot sync problems,” Microsoft Tech Support: May 2, 2012, retrieved from the internet, http://web.Archive.org/web, 3 pages. |
| “Tulsa TechFest 2012—Agenda,” retrieved from the website, http://web.archive.org, Oct. 2, 2012, 2 pages. |
| Burns, “Developing Secure Mobile Applications for Android,” Oct. 2008, Version 1.0, 1-28 pages. |
| Cohen, “Debating the Definition of Cloud Computing Platforms,” retrieved from the internet, http://forbes.com, Feb. 3, 2014, 7 pages. |
| Comes, “MediaXchange Users Manual,” Version 1.15.15, Feb. 1, 2009, pp. 1-90. |
| Delendik, “Evolving with Web Standards—The Story of PDF.JS,” retrieved from the internet, http://people.mozilla.org, Oct. 12, 2012, 36 pages. |
| Delendik, “My PDF.JS talk slides from Tulsa TechFest,” retrieved from the internet, http://twitter.com, Oct. 12, 2012, 2 pages. |
| Duffy, “The Best File-Syncing Services,” pcmag.com, retrieved from the internet: http://www.pcmag.com, Sep. 28, 2012, 7 pages. |
| Exam Report for EP13177108.1, Applicant: Box, Inc. Mailed May 26, 2014, 6 pages. |
| Exam Report for EP13185269.1, Applicant: Box, Inc. Mailed Jan. 28, 7 pages. |
| Exam Report for GB1308842.2, Applicant: Box, Inc. Mailed Mar. 10, 2014, 4 pages. |
| Exam Report for GB1312264.3, Applicant: Box, Inc. Mailed Mar. 24, 2014, 7 pages. |
| Exam Report for GB1314771.5, Applicant: Box, Inc. Mailed Feb. 17, 2014, 7 pages. |
| Exam Report for GB1318792.7, Applicant: Box, Inc. Mailed May 22, 2014, 2 pages. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2013/034765, Applicant: Box, Inc., Mailed Jan. 20, 2014, 15 pages. |
| John et al., “Always Sync Support Forums—View topic—Allway sync funny behavior,” Allway Sync Support Forum at http://sync-center.com, Mar. 28, 2011, XP055109680, 2 pages. |
| Partial Search Report for EP131832800, Applicant: Box, Inc. Mailed May 8, 2014, 5 pages. |
| Pyle et al., “How to enable Event logging for Offline Files (Client Side Caching) in Windows Vista,” Feb. 18, 2009, retrieved from the internet: http://blogs.technet.com, 3 pages. |
| Rao, “Box Acquires Crocodoc to Add HTML5 Document Converter and Sleek Content Viewing Experience to Cloud Storage Platform,” retrieved from the internet, http://techcrunch.com, May 9, 2013, 8 pages. |
| Search Report for EP 11729851.3, Applicant: Box, Inc. Mailed Feb. 7, 2014, 9 pages. |
| Search Report for EP13187217.8, Applicant: Box, Inc. Mailed Apr. 15, 2014, 12 pages. |
| Search Report for EP141509422, Applicant: Box, Inc. Mailed May 8, 2014, 7 pages. |
| Search Report for EP14151588.2, Applicant: Box, Inc. Mailed Apr. 15, 2014, 12 pages. |
| Search Report for EP14153783.7, Applicant: Box, Inc. Mailed Mar. 24, 2014, 7 pages. |
| Sommerer, “Presentable Document Format: Improved On-demand PDF to HTML Conversion,” retrieved from the internet, http://research.microsoft.com, 8 pages. |
| Tulloch et al., “Windows Vista Resource Kit,” Apr. 8, 2007, Microsoft Press, XP055113067, 6 pages. |
| Walker, “PDF.JS project meeting notes,” retrieved from the internet, http://groups.google.com, May 15, 2014, 1 page. |
| Exam Report for GB1410569.6 Applicant: Box, Inc. Mailed Jul. 11, 2014, 9 pp. |
| Sommerer, “Presentable Document Format: Improved On-demand PDF to HTML Conversion,” retrieved from the internet, http://research.microsoft.com, Nov. 2004, 8 pages. |
| Extended Search Report for EP131832800, Applicant: Box, Inc. Mailed Aug. 25, 2014, 7 pages. |
| Extended Search Report for EP141509422, Applicant: Box, Inc. Mailed Aug. 26, 2014, 12pages. |
| Search Report for EP 13189144.2 Applicant: Box, Inc. Mailed Sep. 1, 2014, 9 pages. |
| Exam Report for GB1312874.9 Applicant: Box, Inc. Mailed Sep. 26, 2014, 2 pages. |
| Exam Report for GB1415126.0 Applicant: Box, Inc. Mailed Oct. 2, 2014, 8 pages. |
| Exam Report for GB1415314.2 Applicant: Box, Inc. Mailed Oct. 7, 2014, 6 pages. |
| Exam Report for GB1309209.3 Applicant: Box, Inc. Mailed Oct. 7, 2014, 3 pages. |
| Exam Report for GB1315232.7 Applicant: Box, Inc. Mailed Oct. 9, 2014, 5 pages. |
| Exam Report for GB1318789.3 Applicant: Box, Inc. Mailed Oct. 30, 2014, 6 pages. |
| Microsoft Windows XP Professional Product Documentation: How Inheritance Affects File and Folder Permissions, Apr. 11, 2014, 2 pages. |
| Exam Report for GB1317393.5 Applicant: Box, Inc. Mailed Nov. 7, 2014, 6 pages. |
| Exam Report for GB1311417.8 Applicant: Box, Inc. Mailed Nov. 7, 2014, 2 pages. |
| Exam Report for GB1311421.0 Applicant: Box, Inc. Mailed Nov. 7, 2014, 4 pages. |
| Exam Report for GB1316682.2 Applicant: Box, Inc. Mailed Nov. 19, 2014, 6 pages. |
| Exam Report for GB1312095.1 Applicant: Box, Inc. Mailed Nov. 19, 2014, 5 pages. |
| Exam Report for GB1313559.5 Applicant: Box, Inc. Mailed Nov. 4, 2014, 2 pages. |
| User's Guide for SMART Board Software for Windows, published Dec. 2004, 90 pages. |
| Zambonini et al., “Automated Measuring of Interaction with User Interfaces,” Published as WO2007113573 Oct. 2007, 19 pages. |
| Exam Report for GB1309209.3 Applicant: Box, Inc. Mailed Jan. 19, 2015, 6 pages. |
| “Agilewords—How to Request Approval,” YouTube, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3-Ov3DYNN3Q, Jan. 31, 2011, 2 pages. |
| “Agilewords—Features, Powerful Features Yet Simple,” Jun. 1, 2011, http://web.archive.org/web/20110601223756/http://agilewords.com/product/features, 3 pages. |
| Conner, “Google Apps: The Missing Manual,” published by O'Reilly Media, May 27, 2008, 42 pages. |
| Exam Report for EP 13177108.1, Applicant: Box, Inc., Mailed Feb. 17, 2015, 6 pages. |
| Exam Report for GB1312264.3, Applicant: Box, Inc., Mailed Jan. 30, 2015, 5 pages. |
| Exam Report for GB1312874.9, Applicant: Box, Inc., Mailed Feb. 10, 2015, 7 pages. |
| Exam Report for GB1316685.5, Applicant: Box, Inc., Mailed Feb. 17, 2015, 5 pages. |
| Exam Report for EP 13185269.1, Applicant: Box, Inc., Mailed Feb. 13, 2015, 8 pages. |
| Exam Report for GB1316532.9, Applicant: Box, Inc., Mailed Mar. 27, 2015, 6 pages. |
| Burney, “How to Move Document from Your Computer to Your iPad and Back Again,” May 31, 2011, 3 pages. |
| “How-to Geek, How to Sync Specific Folders With Dropbox,” originally written on Jun. 1, 2010 and archived version retrieved from WaybackMachine as published online on Jul. 4, 2014 at http://www.howtogeek.com/howto/18285/sync-specific-folders-with-dropbox, 5 pages. |
| Exam Report for GB1413461.3; Applicant: Box, Inc. Mailed Aug. 21, 2015, 6 pages. |
| Exam Report for GB1311459.0 Applicant: Box, Inc. Mailed Aug. 19, 2013, 6 pages. |
| “Dropbox: Sync only specific folders,” posted on Feb. 9, 2012, available online at http://www.tech-recipes.com/rx/20865/dropbox-sync-only-specific-folders/, 4 pages. |
| Exam Report for GB1220644.7 Applicant: Box, Inc. Mailed May 1, 2015, 4 pages. |
| Invens, “Using and Troubleshooting Offline Files,” Jun. 23, 2002, Windows IT Pro, pp. 1-5. |
| Invens, “Using and Troubleshooting Offline Files,” Jun. 23, 2002, Windows IT Pro, Figures 1 and 2, 2 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 61/505,999, Jul. 11, 2011, Desktop Application for Access and Interaction with Workspaces in a Cloud-Based Content Management System and Synchronization Mechanisms Thereof. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/282,427, Oct. 26, 2011, Desktop Application for Access and Interaction with Workspaces in a Cloud-Based Content Management System and Synchronization Mechanisms Thereof. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 61/564,425, Nov. 29, 2011, Mobile Platform Folder Synchronization and Offline Synchronization. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 61/568,430, Dec. 8, 2011, Mobile Platform File and Folder Selection Functionalities for Offline Access and Synchronization. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/689,544, Nov. 29, 2012, Mobile Platform File and Folder Selection Functionalities for Offline Access and Synchronization. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 61/560,685, Nov. 16, 2011, Temporal and Spatial Processing and Tracking of Events in a Web-Based Collaboration Environment for Asynchronous Delivery in an Ordered Fashion. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/524,501, Jun. 15, 2012, Resource Effective Incremental Updating of a Remote Client With Events Which Occured Via a Cloud-Enabled Platform. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/526,437, Jun. 18, 2012, Managing Updates at Clients Used by a User To Access a Cloud-Based Collaboration Service. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/658,423, Mar. 16, 2015, Managing Updates at Clients Used by a User To Access a Cloud-Based Collaboration Service. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 61/620,554, Apr. 5, 2012, Device Pinning Capability for Enterprise Cloud Service and Storage Accounts. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/493,922, Jun. 11, 2012, Device Pinning Capability for Enterprise Cloud Service and Storage Accounts. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 61/620,568, Apr. 5, 2012, Synchronization Client Selective Subfolder Syncing in a Cloud-Based Environment. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/865,607, Apr. 4, 2013, Method and Apparatus for Selective Subfolder Synchronization in a Cloud-Based Environment. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 61/622,868, Apr. 11, 2012, Web and Desktop Client Synchronization of Mac Packages With a Cloud-Based Platform. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/618,993, Sep. 14, 2012, Cloud Service Enabled To Handle a Set of Files Depicted To a User as a Single File in a Native Operating System. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 61/643,116, May 4, 2012, Hbase Redundancy Implementation for Action Log Framework. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/890,172, May 8, 2013, Repository Redundancy Implementation of a System Which Incrementally Updates Clients With Events That Occurred Via a Cloud-Enabled Platform. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/888,308, May 6, 2013, Repository Redundancy Implementation of a System Which Incrementally Updates Clients With Events That Occurred Via a Cloud-Enabled Platform. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 61/693,521, Aug. 27, 2012, Backend Implementation of Synchronization Client Selective Subfolder Syncing in a Cloud-Based Environment. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/010,851, Aug. 27, 2013, Server Side Techniques for Reducing Database Workload in Implementing Selective Subfolder Synchronization in a Cloud-Based Environment. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 61/751,578, Jan. 11, 2013, Functionalities, Features, and User Interface of a Synchronization Client To a Cloud-Based Environment. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/153,726, Jan. 13, 2014, Functionalities, Features, and User Interface of a Synchronization Client To a Cloud-Based Environment. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 61/750,474, Jan. 9, 2013, File System Event Monitor and Event Filter Pipeline for a Cloud-Based Platform. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/149,586, Jan. 7, 2014, File System Monitoring in a System Which Incrementally Updates Clients With Events That Occured in a Cloud-Based Collaboration Platform. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 61/753,761, Conflict Resolution, Retry Condition Management, and Handling of Problem Files for The Synchronization Client To a Cloud-Based Platform. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/158,626, Conflict Resolution, Retry Condition Management, and Handling of Problem Files for The Synchronization Client To a Cloud-Based Platform. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 61/739,296, Dec. 19, 2012, Synchronization of Read-Only Files/Folders by a Synchronization Client With a Cloud-Based Platform. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/135,311, Dec. 19, 2013, Method and Apparatus for Synchronization of Items With Read-Only Permissions in a Cloud-Based Environment. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 61/822,170, May 10, 2013, Identification and Handling of Items To Be Ignored for Synchronization With a Cloud-Based Platform by a Synchronization Client. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/275,890, May 13, 2014, Identification and Handling of Items To Be Ignored for Synchronization With a Cloud-Based Platform by a Synchronization Client. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 61/822,191, May 10, 2013, Systems and Methods for Depicting Item Synchronization With a Cloud-Based Platform by a Synchronization Client. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/275,401, May 12, 2014, Top Down Delete or Unsynchronization on Delete of and Depiction of Item Synchronization With a Synchronization Client To a Cloud-Based Platform. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 61/834,756, Jun. 13, 2013, Systems and Methods for Event Building, Collapsing, or Monitoring by a Synchronization Client of a Cloud-Based Platform. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/304,038, Jun. 13, 2014, Systems and Methods for Synchronization Event Building and/or Collapsing by a Synchronization Component of a Cloud-Based Platform. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 61/838,176, Jun. 21, 2013, Maintaining and Updating File System Shadows on a Local Device by a Synchronization Client of a Cloud-Based Platform. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/312,482, Jun. 23, 2014, Maintaining and Updating File System Shadows on a Local Device by a Synchronization Client of a Cloud-Based Platform. |
| Exam Report for GB1316532.9; Applicant: Box, Inc., Mailed Mar. 8, 2016, 3 pages. |
| Ivens, “Using and Troubleshooting Offline Files,” Jun. 23, 2002, Windows IT Pro, Figure 1. |
| Ivens, “Configuring Offline Files,” Apr. 21, 2002, Windows IT Pro, pp. 1-5. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20140188798 A1 | Jul 2014 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 61750474 | Jan 2013 | US | |
| 61748399 | Jan 2013 | US |
