In U.S. Pat. No. 7,562,642 and U.S. Pat. No. 6,354,252, which are the closest prior art, a crankshaft, through a connecting rod and a wrist pin, displaces a big gear wheel. The big gear wheel is meshed at one side with a control rack and at the other side with a one-sided rack secured on a piston. The piston is movable within a cylinder. A synchronized, by small gear wheels and small racks, roller supports the backside of the piston rack and takes the thrust loads. The compression ratio changes continuously by the displacement of the control rack. In comparison to the one-sided mechanism of the closest prior art, the symmetrical mechanism of the present invention is advantageous. For instance, for the same capacity the proposed engine is substantially downsized. The synchronized rollers are released form most of the closest prior art loads. The piston is lighter, yet more robust. The piston mass is symmetrically distributed around the cylinder axis, reducing the bending loads and the inertia torques. The crankshaft axis remains as close to the cylinder axis as desirable. The surfaces where the rollers abut on are integrated, together with the control racks, in a compact and robust frame, releasing the engine casing from vibrations and adjusters. The piston rack is functional at both sides and the forces are distributed on more teeth and surfaces.
In U.S. Pat. No. 3,861,222, the second closest prior art, the inertia force generated by the reciprocating piston is perfectly balanced by a secondary piston that reciprocates in opposite direction, with drawbacks the engine height increase, the inertia loads increase and of the friction increase. The present invention substantially reduces the total height and the friction, and improves the high revving capability of the engine.
In a first preferred embodiment, shown in
In U.S. Pat. No. 7,562,642 the block, in order to house the additional cylinders for the hydraulic control and the big gear wheels, is almost double in width than conventional, while the crankshaft axis is away from the cylinder axis. In the present invention the engine block remains similar in size and weight to the conventional of same capacity, while the crankshaft axis remains as close to the cylinder axis as desirable.
In U.S. Pat. No. 7,562,642 and U.S. Pat. No. 6,354,252, the one-sided piston rack generates significant thrust loads on the piston rack and on the synchronized roller. The surface of each tooth of the rack is inclined by an angle f, typically some 20 degrees, relative to the vertical to the cylinder axis plane. When a tooth of the big gear abuts on a tooth of the rack to apply a force F along the cylinder axis, the inclination of the tooth surface of the rack generates a vertical to the cylinder axis force of F*tan(f), which is about F/3. At TDC, for instance, where the inertia force of the piston is at its maximum value Fmax and the connecting rod is parallel to the cylinder axis, the inclination of the piston rack teeth surface inevitably generates a heavy trust load of about Fmax/3 that loads the casing that needs reinforcement for stiffness.
In the conventional engine, in comparison, when the piston is at TDC and the inertia force from the piston is maximized, there is no thrust load because the connecting rod is parallel to the cylinder axis. After 45 degrees the second order inertia force is zero, the first order inertia force is 70% of its maximum value, the inclination of the connecting rod is only some 10 degrees from the cylinder axis, and the inertia thrust load is maximized being less than one third, for the same piston stroke and the same piston mass.
In the present invention the total, normal to the cylinder axis, force from the gear wheels to the piston racks is zero. The gear wheels and the rollers are way smaller and lighter. The inertia loads and the gas pressure loads on the piston are equally shared among the four piston racks that push the teeth of the four gear wheels, i.e. each gear wheel carries one quarter of the piston load. The control racks support the anti-diametrical teeth of the gear wheels. The inclination of the surface of the piston rack teeth generates vertical to the cylinder axis forces on the four gear wheels that are taken by the wrist pin. The two of these forces are at opposite direction than the other two, giving a zero total force on the wrist pin. This is highly advantageous because the rollers of the gear wheels are released from the heavy loads of the rollers of the closest prior art, and carry only the thrust loads that result from the inclination of the connecting rod. The maximum force on the roller is less than ⅓ of the maximum force on the roller of the closest prior art, allowing way lighter, yet more reliable, rollers.
The four control racks together with the rolling surfaces are integrated into a strong cylindrical rack-frame 700 tightly supported into the cylinder. Only when a different compression ratio is desired, only then the rack-frame has to slightly move along the cylinder. The rack-frame, together with the wrist pin and the gear wheel rollers, resemble to a special purpose roller bearing and can be made as a unit independently. This is advantageous compared to the closest prior art where a spring adjuster, located away from the cylinder axis and supported on the block, supports the backside of the control rack, then a flat surface on the front size of the control rack supports the big gear roller, then the big gear roller supports anti-diametrically the front plane surface of the piston rack, then a flat surface on the backside of the piston rack supports the synchronized roller which is finally supported by an adjustable plane surface on the block. The block needs extra strength to avoid the oscillation of this “series” of parts. The necessary, for the high revs and the heavy load operation, spring preloading adds friction and wear at partial loads and at low revs. In a second preferred embodiment,
The rotation of the crankshaft causes the reciprocation of the rack-frame that causes, by means of the racks of the rack-frame, the rotational oscillation of the gear wheels that cause, by means of the piston racks, the reciprocation of the piston.
The rack-frame reciprocates in opposite direction than the piston. Selecting properly the ratio between the pitch circle of the small gear wheels and the pitch circle of the big gear wheels, the per cylinder free total inertia force becomes zero. For instance with 1:2 ratio of small gear wheel to big gear wheel pitch circle diameter, the piston stroke is twice the rack-frame stroke. In case the total mass of the rack-frame together with the wrist pin and of the reciprocating part of the connecting rod (about ⅓ of the total connecting rod mass) is equal to 2*m, where m is the total mass of the piston with the piston racks, the single cylinder is absolutely balanced as regards its inertia forces, thereby a three cylinder in-line becomes, without any balance shaft, as balanced as the conventional six in-line, and a five cylinder in-line becomes, without any balance shaft, as vibration free as the best V12 and the rotary Wankel engine.
A connecting rod of mass M is equivalent, as regards the inertia forces, with two spot masses, a mass M1 that reciprocates with the piston, located at connecting rod's small end center and a mass M2 rotating with the crankpin and located at connecting rod's big end center, where M1+M2=M and the center of gravity of the set of the M1 and M2 masses being the same with the center of gravity of the connecting rod.
By displacing the control-frame for a distance x along the cylinder axis, the dead volume changes by 3*x*D*D*π/4, where D is the cylinder diameter, and accordingly the compression ratio.
In the U.S. Pat. No. 3,861,222 the piston stroke and the rack-frame stroke are equal because the same gear wheel is meshed at one side with the piston racks and at the opposite side with rack-frame racks.
The opposite reciprocation of piston relative to the reciprocation of the rack-frame causes a significant increase of the engine height for specific piston stroke. This is because the moment the piston is at its lower position, the rack-frame is at its top position. The symmetrical loading of the piston racks enables lightweight, yet robust, piston structure. The opposite happens for the rack-frame: its racks are one-sided loaded which means need for heavy structure to avoid bending, the racks have to be secured to each other by traverse beams, the wrist pin and the upper part of the connecting rod reciprocate together with the rack-frame. As a result, the inertia loads on the connecting rod become a few times heavier than those in the conventional engine of same stroke and same piston mass, the high revving capability of the engine degrades and the friction increases. In order to counterbalance the inertia forces of the rack-frame together with the wrist pin and the reciprocating part of the connecting rod, the piston needs to be loaded with additional mass, which is undesirable.
To solve the previous problems, the gear wheels meshed with the piston racks have substantially bigger pitch circle diameter, double in the embodiment shown, than the gear wheels meshed with the racks on the rack-frame. Besides the substantial reduction of the engine height and of the inertia loads, because the heavy parts perform shorter stroke, the friction is also reduced because the inertia loads are lighter and because the speed of the rack-frame slider is half than the piston speed.
The opposite reciprocation of the piston than the rack-frame shifts the combustion to the slow dead center providing additional time to the mixture to get prepared and burned in better conditions, increasing the constant volume portion of combustion, as happens also in the engine proposed in PCT/EP2007/050809. The peak power revs of compression ignition engines can increase, and proportionally the peak power, while the connecting rod is heavily loaded only in tension.
In a third preferred embodiment, shown in
The control racks and the rolling surfaces are integrated in a strong rack-frame structure 750. The piston racks in combination with the piston skirt, the cylinder wall, the control racks and the gear wheels prevent the carriage from rotating about the wrist pin. On each “back to back” double piston rack, like the 201/202, the vertical to the cylinder axis force, generated by the inclination of the surface of the teeth of the one rack, is reacted/counterbalanced by the opposite force on the opposite rack. This allows more robust, yet lighter, piston structure, necessary for high revving.
The inclination of the surface of the piston rack teeth generates forces on the gear wheel, vertical to the cylinder axis. These forces pass to the carriage and counterbalance the equal and opposite forces on the carriage from the symmetrical gear wheel. This way the rollers have to pass to the rolling surfaces only the thrust loads that are caused by the inclination of the connecting rod, way lighter than the thrust loads on the gear wheels because of the inclination of the piston rack teeth surface.
The control racks and the rolling surfaces are integrated in a rack-frame 750 that slides abutting on proper guides on the engine casing. Displacing the control rack casing along the cylinder axis, for instance mechanically by rotating the two gear shafts, the dead volume changes and consequently the compression ratio.
Compared to the conventional engine of same piston stroke and same cylinder bore, this arrangement is similarly compact and lightweight, it moreover varies continuously the compression ratio and takes the thrust loads by pure rolling of synchronized rollers on rolling surfaces, which means reduced friction and simple piston structure. Compared to the closest prior art, the maximum force that loads the roller is many times lighter as is explained below.
In comparison, in
As regards the gas pressure loads on the rollers at TDC: Now in
In comparison,
In the new mechanism the loads on the rollers are generated from the inclination of the connecting rod. The maximum inclination of the connecting rod happens with the crank pin at 90 degrees after TDC, where neither the inertia forces nor the gas pressure forces on the piston are heavy, moreover the maximum inclination of the connecting rod is small compared to the inclination of the teeth of the piston rack. The inclination of the connecting rod is even smaller when the gas pressure force and or the inertia force on the piston are strong, i.e. near TDC. This results in a more than three times lower maximum load on the roller of the new arrangement than in the closest prior art, allowing way lighter, yet robust and reliable, rollers and less friction.
Although the invention has been described and illustrated in detail, the spirit and scope of the present invention are to be limited only by the terms of the appended claims.