Organizations such as on-line retailers, Internet service providers, search providers, financial institutions, universities, and other computing-intensive organizations often conduct computer operations from large scale computing facilities. Such computing facilities house and accommodate a large amount of server, network, and computer equipment to process, store, and exchange data as needed to carried out an organization's operations. Typically, a computer room of a computing facility includes many server racks. Each server rack, in turn, includes many servers and associated computer equipment.
Computer systems typically include a number of components that generate waste heat. Such components include printed circuit boards, mass storage devices, power supplies, and processors. For example, some computers with multiple processors may generate 250 watts of waste heat. Some known computer systems include a plurality of such larger, multiple-processor computers that are configured into rack-mounted components, and then are subsequently positioned within a rack system. Some known rack systems include 40 such rack-mounted components and such rack systems will therefore generate as much as 10 kilowatts of waste heat. Moreover, some known data centers include a plurality of such rack systems.
Some known data centers include methods and apparatus that facilitate waste heat removal from rack systems. Moreover, some known data centers include a multiple rack systems having configurations that are non-uniform with respect to component density and usage, such that each rack system generates waste heat at a non-uniform rate as compared to other rack systems. In such data centers, application of uniform heat removal methods and apparatus to such non-uniform waste heat generation sources may not be fully efficient and effective in waste heat removal. Moreover, some such data centers rely on servers fans to produce airflow through the servers in the racks. Such fans may, however, add to the costs and complexity of the servers, and, in addition, may be inefficient and prone to failure.
As air for cooling computer systems passes through a rack system, the air may encounter flow restrictions at various openings in the rack and computer systems. In addition, the air may encounter flow restrictions as the air is forced to change direction as the air enters and exits the rack and the enclosures for the individual computer systems. Such flow restrictions tend to reduce the air flow rate through the rack, which may reduce cooling effectiveness.
While the invention is susceptible to various modifications and alternative forms, specific embodiments thereof are shown by way of example in the drawings and will herein be described in detail. It should be understood, however, that the drawings and detailed description thereto are not intended to limit the invention to the particular form disclosed, but on the contrary, the intention is to cover all modifications, equivalents and alternatives falling within the spirit and scope of the present invention as defined by the appended claims. The headings used herein are for organizational purposes only and are not meant to be used to limit the scope of the description or the claims. As used throughout this application, the word “may” is used in a permissive sense (i.e., meaning having the potential to), rather than the mandatory sense (i.e., meaning must). Similarly, the words “include,” “including,” and “includes” mean including, but not limited to.
Various embodiments of systems and methods of cooling computing devices are disclosed. According to one embodiment, a data center includes one or more racks, one or more computing devices coupled to at least one of the racks, and one or more air moving devices. The computing devices include heat producing components. The computing devices may be inclined in the rack such that the lower ends of the computing devices are at a lower elevation than the higher ends of the computing devices. The air moving devices can move air from the lower end of the inclined computing devices to the higher end of the inclined computing devices such that heat is removed from heat producing components in the inclined computing devices.
According to one embodiment, a rack system includes a rack and one or more brackets coupled to the rack. One or more of the brackets can hold a computing device at an incline in the rack such that a lower end of the computing device is at a lower elevation than a higher end of the computing device. In some embodiments, the bracket is adjustable to change the angle of inclination of the computing device.
According to one embodiment, a method of removing heat from computing devices in a rack includes positioning computing devices in a rack at an incline such that such that a lower end of the computing device is at a lower elevation than a higher end of the computing device. Air may be moved through the inclined computing devices such that heat is removed from heat producing components in the computing device.
As used herein, “air handling system” means a system that provides or moves air to, or removes air from, one or more systems or components.
As used herein, an “aisle” means a space next to one or more racks.
As used herein, “ambient” means, with respect to a system or facility, the air surrounding at least a portion of the system or facility. For example, with respect to a data center, ambient air may be air outside the data center, for example, at or near an intake hood of an air handling system for the data center.
As used herein, a “bracket” includes any structure or element, or combination of structures and elements, that can hold or support another element. In some embodiments, for example, a computing device is supported on a pair of opposing L-brackets on either side of the computing device. A bracket may include a rail, a slide, a shelf, a plate, or a combination of one or more such elements.
As used herein, “computing” includes any operations that can be performed by a computer, such as computation, data storage, data retrieval, or communications.
As used herein, “computing device” includes any of various devices in which computing operations can be carried out, such as computer systems or components thereof. One example of a computing device is a rack-mounted server. As used herein, the term computing device is not limited to just those integrated circuits referred to in the art as a computer, but broadly refers to a processor, a server, a microcontroller, a microcomputer, a programmable logic controller (PLC), an application specific integrated circuit, and other programmable circuits, and these terms are used interchangeably herein. Some examples of computing devices include e-commerce servers, network devices, telecommunications equipment, medical equipment, electrical power management and control devices, and professional audio equipment (digital, analog, or combinations thereof). In various embodiments, memory may include, but is not limited to, a computer-readable medium, such as a random access memory (RAM). Alternatively, a compact disc-read only memory (CD-ROM), a magneto-optical disk (MOD), and/or a digital versatile disc (DVD) may also be used. Also, additional input channels may include computer peripherals associated with an operator interface such as a mouse and a keyboard. Alternatively, other computer peripherals may also be used that may include, for example, a scanner. Furthermore, in the some embodiments, additional output channels may include an operator interface monitor and/or a printer.
As used herein, “data center” includes any facility or portion of a facility in which computer operations are carried out. A data center may include servers dedicated to specific functions or serving multiple functions. Examples of computer operations include information processing, communications, testing, simulations, power distribution and control, and operational control.
As used herein, a “duct” includes any device, apparatus, element, or portion thereof, that can direct, segregate, or channel a fluid, such as air. Examples of ducts include cloth or fabric ducts, sheet metal ducts, molded ducts, tubes, or pipes. The cross sectional shape of a passageway of a duct may be square, rectangular, round or irregular, and may be uniform or change over the length of the duct. A duct may be a separately produced component or integral with one or more other components, such as a frame.
As used herein, a “free cooling” includes operation in which an air handling system pulls air at least partially from an external source (such as air outside a facility) and/or a return from a computer room, and forces the air to electronic equipment without active chilling in the air-handling sub-system.
As used herein, “installed” means in place on, or coupled to, a supporting structure or element. In some embodiments, a computer system is installed such that it can be moved on the structure to which it is mounted. For example, a server may be installed on a rail such that the server can slide along the rail.
As used herein, a “module” means a component or a combination of components physically coupled to one another. A module may include functional elements and systems, such as computer systems, racks, blowers, ducts, power distribution units, fire suppression systems, and control systems, as well as structural elements, such a frame, housing, or container. In some embodiments, a module is pre-fabricated at a location off-site from a data center.
As used herein, a “rack” means a rack, container, frame, or other element or combination of elements that can contain or physically support one or more computing devices.
As used herein, a “pin” includes any element that can be positioned to constrain or hold another element in a desired position or orientation. Suitable pins may include straight pins, pegs, threaded bolts, unthreaded bolts, bars, plates, hooks, rods, or screws.
As used herein, “room” means a room or a space of a building. As used herein, “computer room” means a room of a building in which computer systems, such as rack-mounted servers, are operated.
As used herein, “scoop” means an element, or portion thereof, that can collect, channel, receive, or direct a fluid into a passage.
As used herein, a “space” means a space, area or volume.
In some embodiments, a data center includes rack-mounted computing devices installed in one or more racks at an incline.
Air may pass into computing room 102 from sub-floor plenum 108 by way of vent 110. Rear fans 112 in fan door 114 may draw air from front aisle 116 into rack system 104. Air may pass into each computing device 106 (for example, into an enclosure for the computing device) at the front of the computing device, across heat producing components of the computing device, and out through the rear of the computing device. Because of the incline of computing devices 106, the air in the computing devices rises as it flows from the front the rear of the computing devices. Rear fans 112 may exhaust heated air out of the rack. The heated air may pass into ceiling plenum 117.
Air directing device 118 is provided on the front or rack. In various embodiments, one or more air directing devices 118 may be coupled to the front rack system 104 to promote airflow in particular computing devices mounted in the rack.
In various embodiments, the angle of inclination of a computing device may be selected based on cooling requirements of the computing device. For example, a computing device for a low power server may be placed at a relatively horizontal angle, while a high power server may be placed at a relatively steep angle of inclination.
In some embodiments, air directing devices (such as air directing device 118) are located to direct air to desired locations in a particular server. The desired location may be based on the layout of heat producing components of the server. In certain embodiments, an air directing device is placed at desired location along the width of a slot in which the rack is installed. As an example, for a type of server that has sensitive electronic components on the right side and left side of the server and disk drives in the middle, one or more air directing devices may be positioned on each of the left side and right side of the slot.
In various embodiments, different air directing devices (for example, having different sized or shaped passages, orifices, or scoops), may be used in different locations, depending on cooling requirements of the computer systems in the rack. For example, an air directing device for a low power server may have a relatively small scoop and a relatively small orifice, while an air directing device for a high power server may have a relatively large scoop and a relatively large orifice. In some embodiments, the size and/or position of an opening in an air directing device may match the size of a corresponding opening in a server.
In some embodiments, a rack system includes brackets that can hold computing devices at an incline in a rack.
Brackets 140 may include various elements for supporting the computing devices. Brackets 140 may be, for example, a pair of opposing side rails, slides, L-brackets, or a combination thereof. In some embodiments, brackets 140 include a shelf, a mounting plate, or a carriage. In some embodiments, a rack system includes a separate bracket or set of brackets for each computing device. In other embodiments, a single bracket or set of brackets supports more than one computing device.
The angle of inclination of computing devices 134 may be any angle between 0 and 90 degrees. In certain embodiments, the angle of inclination of computing devices in a rack is between about 0 degrees and about 25 degrees. In one embodiment, the angle of inclination of computing devices in a rack is between about 10 degrees and about 25 degrees. The angle of inclination may be fixed or adjustable.
In some embodiments, computing devices in a rack system may be different depths from one another. For example, in the embodiment shown in
In some embodiments, a rack system includes a mechanism for adjusting the incline of computing devices in the rack system.
Although for illustrative purposes only the left side of system 150 is shown, the opposite side of system 150 may include similar elements and construction (for example, a support post, rails, etc.)
Referring again to
Incline adjustment mechanism 158 includes threaded adjustment rod 160 and coupler blocks 162. One of threaded coupler blocks 162 may be connected to each of brackets 156. Coupler bocks 162 may each include a threaded opening through the block. Threaded adjustment rod 160 may be threaded through the threaded opening in each of coupler blocks 162.
In some embodiments, the connection between coupler blocks 162 and brackets 156 is a pivotal connection, such that coupler blocks 162 can rotate with respect to brackets 156. In some embodiments, coupler blocks are coupled to brackets by way of a pivotal and slotted connection, for example, to allow for horizontal movement of the coupler blocks relative to the bracket or other elements of a mechanism. Coupler blocks 156 may pivot to remain such that coupled blocks 162 remain aligned with threaded adjustment rod 160.
Incline adjustment mechanism 158 includes control assembly 166. Control assembly 166 includes control rod 168, connecting rod 170, universal joint 172, and universal joint 174. Guides 176 are attached to the top of enclosure 153. Connecting rod 170 may rotate in guides 176. Control rod 168 is coupled to connecting rod 170 by way of universal joint 172. Connecting rod 170 is connected to threaded adjustment rod 160 by way of universal joint 174.
To operate incline adjustment mechanism 158, control rod 168 may be rotated by a user. Rotating control rod 168 may rotate connecting rod 170, which in turn may rotate threaded adjustment rod 160. As threaded adjustment rod 160 rotates, coupler blocks 162 may ride up or down threaded adjustment rod 160 due to the threaded engagement between threaded adjustment rod 160 and coupler blocks 162. As coupling blocks 162 move upward, the rear portion of each of brackets 156 may rise relative to pivot pins 157, thus increasing the angle of inclination of computing devices 134 in rack system 152. Control rod 168 may rotated as many turns as needed to achieve the desired inclination angle of computing devices 134.
In some embodiments, control rod 168 is removable. In some embodiments, control rod 168 includes a coupling device for a power tool, such as a power drill. For example, a power drill with a hex driver attachment may be coupled in a mating socket on control rod 168. In certain embodiments, an automated drive system may be used to actuate adjustment rod 160 instead of, or in addition to, the series of manually operated rods shown in
In some embodiments, a rack system includes two or more incline adjustment mechanisms. Each of the incline adjustment mechanisms may control incline of a different computing device, or a different set of computing devices.
Incline adjustment mechanisms 158A and 158B may be independently adjustable such that, as illustrated in
In some embodiments, the angle of inclination of one or more computing devices in a rack is performed automatically.
Incline adjustment mechanism 202 includes drive system 204, control system 206, linkage 208, and coupler blocks 210. Linkage 208 includes master link 212, yoke 214, and side links 216. Yoke 214 connects side links 216 to master link 212. Each of side links 216 may be coupled to coupler blocks 210, which are in turn coupled to brackets 156.
Master link 212 of linkage 208 is coupled to drive pin 218 of drive system 204. Drive system 204 may include any suitable mechanisms and components for moving drive pin 218 up or down in slot 220 of drive system 204. A drive mechanism may include, for example, an electric motor, a gear box, chain drive, or linear actuator, or combinations thereof. In certain embodiments, a mechanism provides a pneumatic or hydraulic assist for inclining computing devices in a rack.
Control system 206 is coupled to drive system 204. Control system 206 may include a programmable logic controller. Control system 206 may be operable to control drive system 204 to adjust the angle of inclination of computing devices 134.
In the embodiment shown in
In some embodiments, a rack system includes one or more latch devices for holding computing devices at desired angles of inclination.
Each of server carriages 254A and 254B includes latch pins 260. Latch pins 260 can be selectively engaged in one of holes in latch rail 258. Engagement of latch pin 260 may fix servers in a server carriage at a desired angle of inclination.
Incline adjustment mechanism 256 includes drive 262, bottom pulley 264, chain 266, and trolleys 268A and 268B. Trolley 268A is pivotally coupled to server carriage 254A. Trolley 268B is pivotally coupled to server carriage 254B. Pin 270A in trolley 268A and pin 270B in trolley 268B may each be selectively engaged with chain 266. When pin 270A is engaged on chain 266, drive 262 can be operated to raise or lower the rear end of server carriage 254A. When pin 270B is engaged on chain 266, drive 262 can be operated to raise or lower the rear end of server carriage 254B. Thus, each of server carriages 254A and 254B can be raised or lowered while the trolley for the other server carriage disengaged and the server carriage latched at a fixed angle of inclination. In this manner, each set of servers can be independently placed at a different angle of inclination.
In some embodiments, brackets for inclined mounting of a computing device may couple on standard rack elements.
Although in the embodiment shown in
In some embodiments, cooling rack-mounted computing devices includes inclining the computing devices in the rack. Air may be introduced into the computing devices at the lower end of the computing devices and discharged at the higher end of the computing devices.
In some embodiments, computing devices are at an incline as initially installed in the rack. For example, the computing devices may be installed on inclined mounting brackets. In other embodiments, computing devices are initially installed horizontally, and then tilted after installation to a desired angle of inclination.
In some embodiments, the angle of inclination of a computing device is determined based on cooling requirements for one or more computing devices in a rack. In certain embodiments, the angle of inclination of a computing device is adjusted based on measurements of one or more operating characteristics in a computing device, rack, or data center. Such operating characteristics include ambient temperature, exit air temperature, flow rate, pressure, and humidity.
At 402, the computing devices are operated in a computer room. At 404, one or more characteristics of air in the computer room are measured while the system operates. In one embodiment, the measured characteristics include an airflow rate of air in one or more of the computing devices. In other embodiments, the measured characteristics include an airflow rate of air flowing through the rack. Other measured characteristics include temperature, pressure, or humidity of air in various locations.
At 406, a determination is made whether to adjust an angle of inclination of computing devices based on the measured characteristics and the operating criteria. If the measured characteristics of air and the operating criteria indicate that an adjustment is required, the angle of inclination of one or more computing devices is adjusted at 408. For example, if the flow rate through the computing devices is too low, an angle of inclination may be increased. If the measured characteristics of air and the operating criteria indicate that an adjustment is not required, operation is continued at the same angle of inclination at 410. Adjustment of the angle of inclination of computing devices may be accomplished manually, automatically, or a combination thereof.
In certain embodiments, computing devices may be added or removed in conjunction with changing the angle of inclination of computing devices in a rack. For example, if conditions require that computing devices be placed at a steep angle, some computing devices may need to be removed to allow for the remaining computing devices to be placed at the steeper angle. If conditions allow for computing devices to be placed at a smaller angle of inclination or horizontally, space may be freed up for adding additional computing devices.
In various embodiments shown in
Although in various embodiments shown in
In some embodiments, forces may be exerted on both the front and the rear of a computing device (for example, a front link pushing down on the front of a computing device and a rear link pulling up on the rear of a computing device). In certain embodiments, the force to change the inclination of a computing device may be applied directly to the computing device (instead of, for example, to brackets or other mounting elements for the computing device).
Although in the embodiments described above, some of the computer modules have been shown as being about 1U in height, modules may in various embodiments be 2U, 3U, 4U, or any other height or dimensions.
Although the embodiments above have been described in considerable detail, numerous variations and modifications will become apparent to those skilled in the art once the above disclosure is fully appreciated. It is intended that the following claims be interpreted to embrace all such variations and modifications.
This application is a Continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/103,860, “Rack System Cooling with Inclined Computing Devices”, filed May 9, 2011, which is incorporated by reference in its entirety and is a Continuation-In-Part of each of the following applications: a. U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/751,212, “Rack-Mounted Air Directing Device with Scoop”, filed Mar. 31, 2010, which is incorporated by reference in its entirety; andb. U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/751,206, “Rack-Mounted Computer System with Shock-Absorbing Chassis”, filed Mar. 31, 2010, which is incorporated by reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3834423 | Elson | Sep 1974 | A |
3915477 | Timmons | Oct 1975 | A |
4082092 | Foster | Apr 1978 | A |
4448111 | Doherty | May 1984 | A |
5208722 | Ryan et al. | May 1993 | A |
5294049 | Trunkle et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5506750 | Carteau et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5518277 | Sanders | May 1996 | A |
5621890 | Notarianni et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5772500 | Harvey et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5796580 | Komatsu et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5822184 | Rabinovitz | Oct 1998 | A |
5871396 | Shen | Feb 1999 | A |
6141986 | Koplin | Nov 2000 | A |
6259605 | Schmitt | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6330161 | Smith | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6364009 | Macmanus et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6425417 | Paschke | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6459579 | Farmer et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6499609 | Patriche et al. | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6563704 | Grouell et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
6603661 | Smith et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6621693 | Potter et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6625020 | Hanson et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6767280 | Berger et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6791836 | Cipolla et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6795314 | Arbogast et al. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6859366 | Fink | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6960130 | Gebke et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
7003966 | Sharma et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7010392 | Bash et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7031154 | Bash et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7035111 | Lin et al. | Apr 2006 | B1 |
7042722 | Suzuki et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7112131 | Rasmussen et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7197433 | Patel et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7238104 | Greenslade et al. | Jul 2007 | B1 |
7257956 | Shimada et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7278273 | Whitted et al. | Oct 2007 | B1 |
7283358 | Campbell et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7346913 | Ishimine et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7379299 | Walsh et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7434413 | Wruck | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7500911 | Johnson et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7542288 | Lanus | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7660116 | Claassen et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7701710 | Tanaka et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7733666 | Ichihara et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7764498 | Conn | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7804685 | Krietzman | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7869210 | Moss | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7929300 | Bisbikis et al. | Apr 2011 | B1 |
7990700 | Guo | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8139358 | Tambe | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8154870 | Czamara et al. | Apr 2012 | B1 |
8339778 | Hughes | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8630087 | Reynov | Jan 2014 | B1 |
8638553 | Czamara | Jan 2014 | B1 |
20010029163 | Spinazzola et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20020021557 | Ish imine et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020100736 | Lopez | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20030030991 | Riddiford | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030147219 | Chou | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20040020224 | Bash et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040165349 | Arbogast et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040218355 | Bash et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20050166860 | Austin et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050188689 | Juby et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050207134 | Belady | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050228618 | Patel et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050237716 | Chu et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20060059937 | Perkins et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060274496 | Lee et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070074525 | Vinson et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070101746 | Schlom et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070213000 | Day | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070240433 | Manole | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20080007911 | Hallin | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080013275 | Beckley et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080029250 | Carlson et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080055846 | Clidaras et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080094797 | Coglitore et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080112127 | June et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080232064 | Sato et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080259566 | Fried | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080285232 | Claassen et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080305733 | Noteboom et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090061755 | Calder et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090086441 | Randall et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090321105 | Sawyer | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100024445 | Cichanowicz | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100091458 | Mosier et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100097760 | Azar | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100149754 | Chapel et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20120092811 | Chapel et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0741269 | Nov 1996 | EP |
2053911 | Apr 2009 | EP |
9834450 | Aug 1998 | WO |
2008143503 | Nov 2008 | WO |
Entry |
---|
U.S. Appl. No. 11/535,180, filed Sep. 26, 2006, Osvaldo Patricio Morales. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/751,209, filed Mar. 31, 2010, Michael P. Czamara. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/163,146, filed Jun. 27, 2008, Osvaldo P. Morales. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/886,437, filed Sep. 20, 2010, Peter G. Ross. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/886,472, filed Sep. 20, 2010, Peter G. Ross. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/886,469, filed Sep. 20, 2010, Peter G. Ross. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/956,849, filed Dec. 14, 2007, Osvaldo P. Morales. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/646,417, filed Dec. 23, 2009, Michael P. Czamara. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/341,137, filed Dec. 28, 2008, Jonathan David Hay. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/751,212, filed Mar. 31, 2010, Michael P. Czamara. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/886,440, filed Sep. 20, 2010, Peter GRoss et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/103,860, filed Jan. 28, 2014, Michael P. Czamara. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13103860 | May 2011 | US |
Child | 14163939 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12751212 | Mar 2010 | US |
Child | 13103860 | US | |
Parent | 12751206 | Mar 2010 | US |
Child | 12751212 | US |