This application claims priority to EP 14188485.8, filed Oct. 10, 2014, which is hereby incorporated by reference.
The present disclosure generally relates to field of processing fluid biological samples for analytical purposes and, in particular, to a rack for holding assay tips and/or assay cups for use in analytical systems.
The processing of biological materials is of considerable significance for analytical purposes. Automated liquid handling devices are commonly used in such processes. Devices are commercially available which may include an automated pipetting head assembly movable within the device so that it may be aligned with test tubes or vials for reagent liquid handling.
In some automated liquid handling devices, a pipette head assembly uses disposable assay tips to aspirate and release samples and reagents. Such assay tips are usually provided in a rack (such as shown in
Racks are commonly supplied and/or stored in (pre-configured) stacks of racks (such as shown in
As noted above, it is advantageous to stack the racks with the racks and the assay tips in a nesting arrangement to conserve packaging and storage space. However, when a conventional nestable rack is stacked on another similar rack with the assay tips in a nesting arrangement, there is a risk that, during the stacking process the rack(s) are not properly aligned and thus assay tip(s) in the upper rack collide with the assay tip(s) in the rack below.
To address this problem, prior art racks 10, such as shown in
In order to reduce sample volume and to allow for pipetting out of smaller sample cups, the diameter of the assay tips needs to be reduced, but this increases the risk of assay tip collision and thus assay tip damage upon stacking of the racks. Furthermore, in certain applications, the number of assay tips per rack needs to be increased, leading to a higher rack size and/or higher assay tip density. Under these conditions, prior art racks could only be configured to prevent assay tip collisions by significantly increasing the height of the racks. However keeping the rack height as low as possible is highly desirable to conserve rack raw material.
Embodiments of the disclosed rack therefore aim to provide improved stacking capability while ensuring that assay tip collision is avoided despite possible misalignment as the racks are being stacked.
Therefore, this is a need for a rack with improved stacking capability while ensuring that assay tip collision is avoided despite possible misalignment as the racks are being stacked.
According to the present disclosure, a rack for holding assay tips is presented. The rack can comprise a surface plate. The surface plate can comprise assay tip through boreholes extending substantially in a Z direction orthogonal to the surface plate. The assay tip through boreholes can have seating areas for receiving assay tips in the rack. The rack can further comprise a peripheral skirt extending from a periphery of the surface plate substantially in the Z direction and at least four guiding elements extending substantially in the Z direction. A first pair of the four guiding elements can be respectively arranged near opposing edges of a first side wall of the peripheral skirt and a second pair of the four guiding elements can be respectively arranged near opposing edges of a second side wall of the peripheral skirt, substantially orthogonal to the first side wall. Each guiding element can comprise a slit and a corresponding rail. The guiding elements can be arranged such that the rail of the rack is guided into a corresponding slit of a similar rack thereby aligning the rack and a similar rack and such that assay tips can be received in the assay tip through boreholes of the rack nest into the assay tips received in assay tip through boreholes of the similar rack when the racks are stacked.
Accordingly, it is a feature of the embodiments of the present disclosure to provide for a rack with improved stacking capability while ensuring that assay tip collision is avoided despite possible misalignment as the racks are being stacked. Other features of the embodiments of the present disclosure will be apparent in light of the description of the disclosure embodied herein.
The following detailed description of specific embodiments of the present disclosure can be best understood when read in conjunction with the following drawings, where like structure is indicated with like reference numerals and in which:
In the following detailed description of the embodiments, reference is made to the accompanying drawings that form a part hereof, and in which are shown by way of illustration, and not by way of limitation, specific embodiments in which the disclosure may be practiced. It is to be understood that other embodiments may be utilized and that logical, mechanical and electrical changes may be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the present disclosure.
The disclosed rack is based on the recognition that, before the centrally arranged guiding elements of prior art racks start to engage and thus align the prior art racks, a too high of a misaligned stacking depth MSD0 can already be reached, especially in areas around the edges/and corners of the prior art racks 10, such as is illustrated in
In order to reduce the misaligned stacking depth by ensuring an early alignment, the guiding elements of the disclosed racks can be arranged near the edges of the side walls of the the peripheral skirt. Additionally, in order to provide an alignment of the racks for both positive and negative vertical misalignment angles, a pair of guiding elements can be arranged along opposing edges of the side wall(s). Furthermore, in order to provide an alignment of vertical misalignment in both the Z-Y and Z-X planes of the three-dimensional Cartesian coordinate system, four guiding elements of the disclosed racks can be arranged near opposing edges of two substantially orthogonal side walls of the peripheral skirt.
The drawbacks of prior art racks are addressed by embodiments of the disclosed rack. In one embodiment, the disclosed rack can include: a surface plate, the surface plate comprising assay tip through boreholes extending substantially in a Z direction orthogonal to the surface plate, the assay tip through boreholes having seating areas for receiving assay tips in the rack; a peripheral skirt extending from a periphery of the surface plate substantially in the Z direction; and at least four guiding elements extending substantially in the Z direction. A first pair of the four guiding elements can respectively be arranged near opposing edges of a first side wall of the peripheral skirt and a second pair of the four guiding elements can respectively be arranged near opposing edges of a second side wall of the peripheral skirt, substantially orthogonal to the first side wall. Each guiding element can comprise a slit and a corresponding rail. The guiding elements can be arranged such that the rail of the rack can be guided into a corresponding slit of a similar rack thereby aligning the rack and a similar rack and such that assay tips can be received in the assay tip through boreholes of the rack nest into the assay tips received in assay tip through boreholes of the similar rack when the racks are stacked.
Embodiments of the disclosed rack can be particularly advantageous as an early guidance during a stacking process can be provided in two dimensions, thereby avoiding increase of or even allowing a reduction of the stacking height despite increased assay tip density and/or increased rack size and/or decreased assay tip dimensions, such as in particular, a decrease in assay tip diameter.
In addition, further embodiments of the disclosed rack can comprise guiding elements configured to provide both vertical and horizontal alignment of the racks.
In order to further improve alignment, according to further embodiments of the disclosed rack; an increased guiding length of the guiding elements may be provided such that the rack height can be defined as the sum of the assay tip height and the guiding length. These further embodiments of the disclosed rack can be particularly advantageous as the guiding length may be increased—thereby improving alignment—without affecting the stacking height of the racks. Thus, in these embodiments, while the rack height of individual rack(s) is increased, the height of a stack of racks can only be increased by the height increase of one rack because the stacking height can only be affected by the safe nesting depth of assay tips and not the guiding length.
A feature of further embodiments of the rack 1, 1′ is shown on the cross section along plane Z-X of
Alternatively (not shown on the figures), the slits 5, 5.1-5.m themselves may be configured to provide a stop for the corresponding rail 6, 6.1-6.m, defining a stacking height SH of the stacked racks 1.
According to some embodiments, the peripheral skirt 7 can be tapered outwards such that a lower part of the peripheral skirt 7 of an upper rack 1 can accommodate an upper part of a lower rack 1′ on which the upper rack 1 is stacked. The peripheral skirt 7 of these embodiments therefore can have the shape of a hollow truncated pyramid with an open bottom and a rounded rectangular cross section.
The peripheral skirt 7 can comprise guiding elements extending substantially in the Z direction, each guiding element comprising a slit 5, 5.1-5.m and a corresponding rail 6, 6.1-6.m. As shown, the rails 6, 6.1-6.m can be arranged on the inside and in a lower part of the peripheral skirt 7 and the slits 5, 5.1-5.m can be arranged on the outside and in an upper part of the peripheral skirt 7.
The term “substantially” can be used herein to refer to extend the scope of properties of features to cover production tolerances/errors and/or minor deviations of the property that do not affect the functional characteristics of the feature to serve its purpose.
The term “inside” as used herein with reference to “the inside” of the peripheral skirt 7, can refer to the side of the sidewalls 7A-7D of the peripheral skirt 7 facing the hollow space defined by the peripheral skirt 7 and the surface plate 3.
The term “outside” as used herein with reference to “the outside” of the peripheral skirt 7, can refer to the side of the sidewalls 7A-7D of the peripheral skirt 7 facing away from the hollow rack 1.
The term “lower part” as used herein with reference to “the lower part” of the peripheral skirt 7, can refer to a lower portion of the peripheral skirt 7 in the negative Z direction (of the three-dimensional Cartesian coordinate system) substantially orthogonal to the surface plate 3, in particular, a lower part extending to the lower extreme edges of the side walls 7A-7D of the peripheral skirt 7.
The term “upper part” as used herein with reference to “the upper part” of the peripheral skirt 7, can refer to an upper portion of the peripheral skirt 7 in the positive Z direction (of the three-dimensional Cartesian coordinate system) substantially orthogonal to the surface plate 3, in particular, parts extending to the upper extreme edges of the side walls 7A-7D of the peripheral skirt 7 adjacent to the surface plate 3.
As shown on the figures, in particular on
The guiding elements can be arranged such that the rack 1 can be aligned with a similar rack 1′ such that assay tips 100 received in the assay tip through boreholes 9 of the rack 1 can nest into the assay tips 100′ received in a similar rack 1′ when the racks 1, 1′ are stacked, as illustrated on
The term “aligned” can be used with reference to racks aligned upon stacking in the sense that the respective surface plates 3, 3 of the racks 1, 1′ can be all substantially parallel to the X-Y plane (vertical alignment) and the stacked racks can be brought into substantially identical positions and orientation in the X-Y plane (horizontal alignment) above each other (along the Z axis). In functional definition, the term “align” with reference to racks aligned upon stacking, can refer to the racks reaching an alignment sufficient so as to prevent assay tip collision. In other words, aligned cannot to be interpreted to mean a strict 100% geometrical alignment.
The term “substantially” can be used here in the sense to include a certain allowable error margin/tolerance, which can be low enough to allow assay tips 100 to nest without collision.
The term “vertical misalignment” (referenced to by vertical misalignment angle αV) as used herein can refer to racks 1, 1′ at an angle with respect to each other in the Z-X respectively Z-Y planes. Correspondingly, the term “vertical alignment” can be used to refer to reducing the vertical misalignment below the allowable error margin/tolerance to ensure the respective surface plates 3, 3 of the racks 1; 1′ can all be substantially parallel to the X-Y plane, thereby ensuring that the assay tips 100 nest without collision.
The term “horizontal misalignment” as used herein can refer to racks 1, 1′ being offset with respect to each other in the X-Y plane (referenced to by linear horizontal misalignment Δ, ΔX, ΔY) and/or horizontal angular misalignment (referenced to by horizontal misalignment angle αV) of the racks 1, 1′ in the X-Y plane (also referred to as orientation). Correspondingly the term “horizontal alignment” can be used to refer to reducing the linear horizontal misalignment Δ, ΔX, ΔY and/or the horizontal angular misalignment αH so that the stacked racks can be brought into substantially identical positions and orientation, thereby ensuring that the assay tips 100 nest without collision. The horizontal (mis)alignment of two racks 1, 1′ is exaggeratedly illustrated on
As illustrated on the cross section along plane Z-X of
The “term misaligned stacking depth” MSD as used herein can refer to the deepest stacking depth reached by an upper rack 1 onto a lower rack 1′ upon stacking before the alignment. The misaligned stacking depth MSD may also be defined as the distance in the Z direction (before the alignment) between the bottom of the peripheral skirt 7 of a rack 1 and the upper surface 3.1 of a further rack 1′ it is stacked on.
The sequence of
The horizontal misalignment angle αH can be reduced collaboratively by horizontal alignment sections 5H of multiple slits 5 arranged on substantially orthogonal side walls 7A-7D of the peripheral skirt 7 by way of a combination of linear horizontal alignments ΔX, ΔY in the X respectively Y directions.
The block arrow on
The detail
After the misaligned stacking depth MSD is exceeded (not shown on
The term “guiding length” GL can be used herein to refer to the depth the rails 6 of a rack 1 need to slide into the slits 5′ of a lower rack 1′ so that the racks 1, 1′ can be aligned sufficiently so as to avoid assay tip 100, 100′ collision. As seen on
The end of the stacking process of the racks 10, 10′ is illustrated on
As illustrated, the slits 5, 5′ and the rails 6, 6′ may be dimensioned so as to allow for a predefined tolerance in order to ease stacking and to prevent racks 1, 1′ being stuck together.
It can be noted that while the horizontal respectively vertical alignments are separately described and illustrated, in reality, the alignment may be in fact one complex movement comprising linear and/or rotational component(s) along and/or around the X, Y, Z axes of the three-dimensional Cartesian coordinate system.
In order to prevent assay tip 100, 100′ collision on stacking, the rack height RH may therefore be defined according to an embodiments as the sum of the pipette height PH (see
Also shown on
In order to prevent damage to the assay tips 100, in particular their neck portions 103, the height of the tubular extensions EH (measured from the top surface 3.1) can be chosen so that upon stacking of the racks 1, 1′, the tubular extension 9e of one rack 1 does not come in contact with the assay tip 100 received in the rack 1′ below, leaving an extension-bottom to tip neck stacking clearance ESC therebetween. In other words, the height of the tubular extensions EH can equal to the sum of the stacking height SH and the extension-bottom to tip neck stacking clearance ESC.
Referring back to
The stack of racks 1, 1′ after alignment is shown on
As apparent from the perspective view of
The term “substantially orthogonal” with reference to side walls 7A-7D of the peripheral wall 7, can be used to refer to side walls which, while not necessarily strictly orthogonal (in geometrical terms), due to outside taper of the peripheral skirt 7, can have substantially perpendicular intersections with section planes parallel to the X-Y plane. In other words, substantially orthogonal side walls can be side wall which can be orthogonal if the outside taper of the peripheral is not accounted for. For example, side walls 7A and 7B (see
According to further embodiments of the rack 1 as shown on
The term “orientation” as used herein with reference to the stacking orientation of racks, can be used to refer to the angular direction of a rack in the X-Y plane.
Embodiments of the disclosed rack may be made with any material, but in one embodiment, the racks are manufactured using, for example, of various plastic materials, such as polystyrene, by molding, such as by injection molding.
It is noted that terms like “preferably,” “commonly,” and “typically” are not utilized herein to limit the scope of the claimed embodiments or to imply that certain features are critical, essential, or even important to the structure or function of the claimed embodiments. Rather, these terms are merely intended to highlight alternative or additional features that may or may not be utilized in a particular embodiment of the present disclosure.
For the purposes of describing and defining the present disclosure, it is noted that the term “substantially” is utilized herein to represent the inherent degree of uncertainty that may be attributed to any quantitative comparison, value, measurement, or other representation. The term “substantially” is also utilized herein to represent the degree by which a quantitative representation may vary from a stated reference without resulting in a change in the basic function of the subject matter at issue.
Having described the present disclosure in detail and by reference to specific embodiments thereof, it will be apparent that modifications and variations are possible without departing from the scope of the disclosure defined in the appended claims. More specifically, although some aspects of the present disclosure are identified herein as preferred or particularly advantageous, it is contemplated that the present disclosure is not necessarily limited to these preferred aspects of the disclosure.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
14188485.8 | Oct 2014 | EP | regional |