This disclosure generally relates to a radar assembly, and more particularly relates to a transition between a rectangular-waveguide (RWG) and a substrate-integrated-waveguide (SIW) where the transition includes apertures defined by at least three of a plurality of conductor-layers of a printed circuit board that also defines the SIW.
Wideband Transitions are used in wide band radar systems such as Automotive Radar. Known transitions with sufficient bandwidths include undesirably expensive waveguide flanges or metal structures, where critical tolerances add to the cost.
Described herein is a wideband transition that is formed using standard printed circuit board (PCB) processes, so is able to avoid using expensive waveguide flanges or metal structures. The non-limiting example described herein provides a transition between a Rectangular Waveguide (RWG) to a Substrate Integrated Waveguide (SIW) suitable for use with, for example, electromagnetic energy having a 16 GHz bandwidth around a 79 GHz fundamental frequency. The transition is suitable for compact multilayer printed circuit board (PCB) construction like Ultra Short Range Radar (USRR), using standard PCB fabrication processes.
In accordance with one embodiment, a radar assembly is provided. The assembly includes a rectangular-waveguide (RWG) and a printed-circuit-board. The rectangular-waveguide (RWG) propagates electromagnetic energy in a transverse electric mode (TE10) and in a first direction. The printed-circuit-board includes a plurality of conductor-layers oriented parallel to each other. The printed-circuit-board defines a substrate-integrated-waveguide (SIW) that propagates the electromagnetic energy in a transverse electric mode (TE10) and in a second direction perpendicular to the first direction, and defines a transition that propagates the electromagnetic energy between the rectangular-wave-guide and the substrate-integrated-waveguide. The transition includes apertures defined by at least three of the plurality of conductor-layers.
Further features and advantages will appear more clearly on a reading of the following detailed description of the preferred embodiment, which is given by way of non-limiting example only and with reference to the accompanying drawings.
The present invention will now be described, by way of example with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:
The assembly 10 includes a rectangular-waveguide 12 or RWG 12 that propagates the electromagnetic energy 14 in a transverse electric mode (TE10) and in a first direction 16. The first direction 16 is illustrated as a double-ended arrow because, as will be recognized by those in the art, the RWG 12 can be used to propagate the electromagnetic energy 14 into (i.e. towards) the assembly 10, or out of (i.e. away from) the assembly 10. The physical size of the RWG 12 is selected based on the operating frequency of the radar system using well-known design rules.
The assembly 10 also includes a printed-circuit-board 18 that includes a plurality of conductor-layers 20 oriented parallel to each other. The physical dimensions and materials used for dielectric-layers 22 and the plurality of conductor-layers 20 are selected based on the operating frequency of the radar system using well-known design rules. By way of example and not limitation, the plurality of conductor-layers 20 may include eight conductor layers: L1, L2, L3, L4, L5, L6, L7, and L8 (
The assembly 10, or more specifically the printed-circuit-board 18, also includes or defines a transition 30 that propagates the electromagnetic energy 14 between the rectangular-wave-guide 12 and the substrate-integrated-waveguide 24. As noted above, it is contemplated that the electromagnetic energy 14 could be in either direction; either from the rectangular-wave-guide 12 to the substrate-integrated-waveguide 24, or from the substrate-integrated-waveguide to the rectangular-wave-guide 12. The transition 30 includes a plurality of apertures 32 defined by at least three (e.g. L1-L3) of the plurality of conductor-layers 20. That is, the transition 30 includes or is defined by at least three instances of apertures. In this example, the transition 30 includes or is defined by a first layer 20A (L1) of the plurality of conductor-layers 20 that is adjacent to or in contact with the rectangular-waveguide 12. The first layer 20A defines a first aperture 32A characterized by a first-size 34. The transition 30 also includes a last layer 20B (L3) of the plurality of conductor-layers 20 that is adjacent to the substrate-integrated-waveguide 24, where the last layer 20B also defines a horizontal-boundary 36 of the substrate-integrated-waveguide 24. With respect to the transition 30, the last layer 20B defines a last aperture 32B characterized by a last-size 34B that is greater than the first-size 34A.
The transition 30 also includes or is defined by one or more instances of an intermediate layer 20C of the plurality of conductor-layers 20 located between the first layer 20A and the last layer 20B of the transition 30. The intermediate layer 20C defines an intermediate aperture 32C characterized by an intermediate-size 34C with a value between the last-size 34B and the first-size 34A. It is contemplated that the transition 30 could have more than a single instance of the intermediate layer 20C between the first layer 20A and the last layer 20B so that the transition 30 would include or be formed by more than three instances of the apertures 32. That is, it is contemplated that the transition 30 could consist of additional apertures in addition to the intermediate aperture 32C between the first aperture 32A and the last aperture 32B. The progression or variation of the sizes of the apertures 32 may be determine or optimized using known design techniques. For example, the dimensions of the apertures 32 may be optimized on 3D-EM software HFSS for efficient transfer of energy and impedance matching between the RWG 12 and the SIW 24 over wide frequency range.
In order to reduce the amount of the electromagnetic energy 14 that leaks out of the transition 30 so is not communicated between the rectangular-wave-guide 12 and the substrate-integrated-waveguide 24. The transition 30 may also include one or more instances of a short wall 38 that serves to define a vertical-boundary 40 of the transition 30. The short wall 38 may be formed of an arrangement of vias 42, which may be part of the vias 42 used to define the SIW 24.
Accordingly, a radar assembly (the assembly 10) is provided. The assembly 10 provides a wideband transition (the transition 30) between the rectangular waveguide 12 (RWG 12) to the substrate integrated waveguide 24 (SIW 24) using the inner layers of a multilayer PCB (printed-circuit-board 18) for operation in the W-band of the electromagnetic spectrum. The transition is formed by a series of apertures through conductive layers (e.g. L1 thru L3). The transition 30 is advantageously and economically provided by using a multi-layered PCB processed using standard PCB processing technology typically used for the W-band. As such, no special flanges or metal structures are necessary, so the expense and critical tolerances associated features are avoided.
While this invention has been described in terms of the preferred embodiments thereof, it is not intended to be so limited, but rather only to the extent set forth in the claims that follow.
This is a continuation application and claims the benefit under 35 U.S.C. § 120 of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 16/583,867, filed Sep. 26, 2019, now U.S. Pat. No. 10,833,385, which in turn claims priority to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/427,769, filed Feb. 8, 2017, now U.S. Pat. No. 10,468,736, issued Nov. 5, 2019, the entire disclosures of which are hereby incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3462713 | Knerr | Aug 1969 | A |
3579149 | Ramsey | May 1971 | A |
4157516 | Van De Grijp | Jun 1979 | A |
4453142 | Murphy | Jun 1984 | A |
4562416 | Sedivec | Dec 1985 | A |
5065123 | Heckaman et al. | Nov 1991 | A |
5414394 | Gamand | May 1995 | A |
5982250 | Hung | Nov 1999 | A |
5982256 | Uchimura et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5986527 | Ishikawa et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6489855 | Kitamori et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6658233 | Ikeda | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6794950 | Du Tolt et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6867660 | Kitamori et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6958662 | Salmela et al. | Oct 2005 | B1 |
7276988 | Stoneham | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7973616 | Shijo et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
7994879 | Kim et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8013694 | Hiramatsu et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8089327 | Margomenos et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8159316 | Miyazato et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8680936 | Purden | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8692731 | Lee et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
9007269 | Lee et al. | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9450281 | Kim | Sep 2016 | B2 |
9673532 | Cheng et al. | Jun 2017 | B2 |
9935065 | Baheti et al. | Apr 2018 | B1 |
10468736 | Mangaiahgari | Nov 2019 | B2 |
10775573 | Hsu et al. | Sep 2020 | B1 |
10833385 | Mangaiahgari et al. | Nov 2020 | B2 |
20020021197 | Elco | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20040069984 | Estes et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20060113598 | Chen et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060145777 | Mueller | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20080129409 | Nagaishi et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080150821 | Koch et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20090207090 | Pettus et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090243762 | Chen et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20100193935 | Lachner et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20110140810 | Lei | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110140979 | Dayan | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20120013421 | Hayata | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120050125 | Leiba et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120068316 | Ligander | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120163811 | Doany et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120242421 | Robin et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120256707 | Lei | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120256796 | Leiba | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20130057358 | Anthony et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130256849 | Danny et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20140015709 | Shijo et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140091884 | Flatters | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140106684 | Burns et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20150097633 | Devries et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150229017 | Suzuki et al. | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150357698 | Kushta | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20150364804 | Tong et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20150364830 | Tong et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20160043455 | Seler et al. | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160049714 | Ligander et al. | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160111764 | Kim | Apr 2016 | A1 |
20160118705 | Tang et al. | Apr 2016 | A1 |
20160204495 | Takeda et al. | Jul 2016 | A1 |
20160276727 | Dang et al. | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20160293557 | Topak et al. | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20160301125 | Kim et al. | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20170084554 | Dogiamis et al. | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170099705 | Mazzon | Apr 2017 | A1 |
20170324135 | Blech et al. | Nov 2017 | A1 |
20180131084 | Park et al. | May 2018 | A1 |
20180226709 | Mangaiahgari | Aug 2018 | A1 |
20180233465 | Spella et al. | Aug 2018 | A1 |
20180284186 | Chadha et al. | Oct 2018 | A1 |
20180343711 | Wixforth et al. | Nov 2018 | A1 |
20180351261 | Kamo et al. | Dec 2018 | A1 |
20190006743 | Kirino et al. | Jan 2019 | A1 |
20190013563 | Takeda et al. | Jan 2019 | A1 |
20190207286 | Moallem | Jul 2019 | A1 |
20200021001 | Mangaiahgairi | Jan 2020 | A1 |
20200235453 | Lang | Jul 2020 | A1 |
20200343612 | Shi | Oct 2020 | A1 |
20210036393 | Mangaiahgari | Feb 2021 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2654470 | Dec 2007 | CA |
1620738 | May 2005 | CN |
1682404 | Oct 2005 | CN |
2796131 | Jul 2006 | CN |
201383535 | Jan 2010 | CN |
102696145 | Sep 2012 | CN |
103515682 | Jan 2014 | CN |
104900956 | Sep 2015 | CN |
105098295 | Nov 2015 | CN |
105609909 | May 2016 | CN |
105680133 | Jun 2016 | CN |
105958167 | Sep 2016 | CN |
109750201 | May 2019 | CN |
209389219 | Sep 2019 | CN |
102016213202 | Jan 2018 | DE |
102019200893 | Jul 2020 | DE |
2500978 | Sep 2012 | EP |
2843758 | Mar 2015 | EP |
2945222 | Nov 2015 | EP |
3460903 | Mar 2019 | EP |
2489950 | Oct 2012 | GB |
2003243902 | Aug 2003 | JP |
2003289201 | Oct 2003 | JP |
100846872 | May 2008 | KR |
20080044752 | May 2008 | KR |
2013189513 | Dec 2013 | WO |
2018003932 | Jan 2018 | WO |
Entry |
---|
D. Deslandes and K. Wu, “Integrated transition of coplanar to rectangular waveguides,” 2001 IEEE MTT-S International Microwave Sympsoium Digest (Cat. No. 01CH37157), 2001, pp. 619-622 vol. 2, doi: 10.1109/MWSYM.2001.966971. (Year: 2001). |
“Foreign Office Action”, CN Application No. 201810122408.4, dated Jan. 26, 2022, 15 pages. |
“Foreign Office Action”, CN Application No. 201810122408.4, dated May 6, 2022, 15 pages. |
“Foreign Office Action”, CN Application No. 201810122408.4, dated Oct. 18, 2021, 19 pages. |
“Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 16/829,409, dated Oct. 14, 2021, 13 pages. |
“Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 17/061,675, dated Dec. 20, 2021, 4 pages. |
Wang, et al., “Mechanical and Dielectric Strength of Laminated Epoxy Dielectric Graded Materials”, Mar. 2020, 15 pages. |
“Extended European Search Report”, EP Application No. 20166797, dated Sep. 16, 2020, 11 pages. |
“Foreign Office Action”, CN Application No. 201810122408.4, dated Jun. 2, 2021, 15 pages. |
“Extended European Search Report”, EP Application No. 18153137.7, dated Jun. 15, 2018, 8 pages. |
“Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 16/583,867, dated Feb. 18, 2020, 8 pages. |
“Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 15/427,769, dated Nov. 13, 2018, 8 pages. |
“Notice of Allowance”, U.S. Appl. No. 15/427,769, dated Jun. 28, 2019, 9 pages. |
“Notice of Allowance”, U.S. Appl. No. 16/583,867, dated Jul. 8, 2020, 8 Pages. |
Jankovic, et al., “Stepped Bend Substrate Integrated Waveguide to Rectangular Waveguide Transitions”, Jun. 2016, 2 pages. |
“Foreign Office Action”, CN Application No. 201810122408.4, dated Sep. 20, 2022, 19 pages. |
Dai, et al., “An Integrated Millimeter-Wave Broadband Microstrip-to-Waveguide Vertical Transition Suitable for Multilayer Planar Circuits”, IEEE Microwave and Wireless Components Letters, vol. 26, No. 11, 2016, pp. 897-899. |
“Extended European Search Report”, EP Application No. 21203201.5, dated Apr. 7, 2022, 12 pages. |
“Foreign Office Action”, CN Application No. 202111321802.9, dated Nov. 22, 2022, 17 pages. |
Bauer, et al., “A wideband transition from substrate integrated waveguide to differential microstrip lines in multilayer substrates”, Sep. 2010, pp. 811-813. |
Deutschmann, et al., “A Full W-Band Waveguide-to-Differential Microstrip Transition”, Jun. 2019, pp. 335-338. |
Giese, et al., “Compact Wideband Single-ended and Differential Microstrip-to-waveguide Transitions at W-band”, Jul. 2015, 4 pages. |
Tong, et al., “A Vertical Transition Between Rectangular Waveguide and Coupled Microstrip Lines”, IEEE Microwave and Wireless Components Letters, vol. 22, No. 5, May 2012, pp. 251-253. |
Tong, et al., “A Wide Band Transition from Waveguide to Differential Microstrip Lines”, Dec. 2008, 5 pages. |
Topak, et al., “Compact Topside Millimeter-Wave Waveguide-to-Microstrip Transitions”, IEEE Microwave and Wireless Components Letters, vol. 23, No. 12, Dec. 2013, pp. 641-643. |
Yuasa, et al., “A millimeter wave wideband differential line to waveguide transition using short ended slot line”, Oct. 2014, pp. 1004-1007. |
“Extended European Search Report”, EP Application No. 22188348.1, dated Mar. 14, 2023, 8 pages. |
“Foreign Office Action”, CN Application No. 201810122408.4, dated Jan. 30, 2023, 21 pages. |
“Foreign Office Action”, CN Application No. 202111321802.9, dated Mar. 31, 2023, 16 pages. |
Henawy, et al., “Integrated Antennas in eWLB Packages for 77 GHZ and 79 GHZ Automotive Radar Sensors”, 2011 41st European Microwave Conference, Oct. 10, 2011, pp. 1312-1315. |
Schellenberg, et al., “CAD Models for Suspended and Inverted Microstrip”, IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques, vol. 43, No. 6, Jun. 1995, pp. 1247-1252. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20210036393 A1 | Feb 2021 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 16583867 | Sep 2019 | US |
Child | 17073254 | US | |
Parent | 15427769 | Feb 2017 | US |
Child | 16583867 | US |