The present specification generally relates to baggage screening systems, and in particular, relates to systems for material-specific detection using non-ionizing radiation and metal detectors.
Terrorism is a threat to the public especially in crowded locations. Threat devices, such as weapons, or threat materials, such as explosives, may be carried in hand baggage with little probability of detection by casual, or even skilled, observers. Therefore, it has become common practice to require travelers to divest themselves of their hand baggage when entering or passing through a critical facility such as an airport, train depot, or public building. The baggage is then searched either manually, or via X-ray scanning systems to produce images of the baggage being scanned. Currently, known technologies require a trained algorithm to analyze the shape of detected threat objects in the scanned images to determine if it is a threat or if it is innocuous. From the shape alone, however, it is difficult to assess the nature of many potential threats, or ascertain whether they are indeed innocuous items, and therefore false alarm rates tend to be significant.
In order to reduce baggage scan time and make the searching of baggage efficient, there is a need to separate personnel screening systems from baggage screening systems, so that successful baggage screening can be achieved with low cost, widely deployable, sensors that do not pose any health risk to the general population.
Hence, there is need for a low cost, zero health hazard, carry-on baggage scanning system for use with relatively untrained operators for directed search on a fraction of scanned bags, based on large potential threat items. There is also need for a baggage scanning system that may be deployed in potentially high threat areas such as, but not limited to, critical infrastructure, special events, crowded areas such as shopping malls and the aviation sector.
The following embodiments and aspects thereof are described and illustrated in conjunction with systems, tools and methods, which are meant to be exemplary and illustrative, and not limiting in scope. The present application discloses numerous embodiments.
The present specification discloses a baggage scanning system comprising: an aperture defining a scanning tunnel; a conveyor configured to move baggage through the scanning tunnel; a radar array distributed around the aperture, the radar array comprising a plurality of radar sub-systems for providing radar scan data comprising location and dielectric properties of a threat object in the baggage; a metal detection system comprising: at least a plurality of magnetic field generators and a plurality of magnetic field detectors positioned respectively at least on two opposing sides of the aperture; and a processor configured to cause a magnetic field to be generated in the aperture via the magnetic field generators, configured to receive data from the plurality of magnetic field detectors and configured to determine values indicative of a magnetic field modified by the baggage passing through the aperture in order to generate metal detector scan data; and at least one processor configured to correlate the radar scan data and the metal detector scan data and to determine one or more regions of the baggage requiring further inspection.
Optionally, the baggage scanning system further comprises a video camera system positioned within the aperture and configured to generate surface profile data. Optionally, the at least one processor is configured to use the surface profile data, radar scan data and metal detector scan data to highlight the one or more regions over an image of the baggage being scanned.
Optionally, the metal detector scan data comprises localization and characterization data of objects present in the baggage.
Optionally, the plurality of magnetic field generators and the plurality of magnetic field detectors are positioned on a top of the aperture and on a bottom of the aperture.
Optionally, the plurality of magnetic field generators and the plurality of magnetic field detectors are positioned below the conveyor.
Optionally, the radar sub-system comprises at least a Vivaldi antenna coupled with an electronics drive circuit.
Optionally, the radar sub-system is operated in frequency modulated continuous wave mode (FMCW) with a center operating frequency ranging from 1 GHz to 3000 GHz and a bandwidth that is equal to or greater than 10 GHz.
Optionally, the radar sub-system can be selected to operate in either transmit mode or receive mode.
Optionally, each of the magnetic field generators comprises a magnetic field transmitter coil and each of the magnetic field detectors comprises a magnetic field receiver coil.
Optionally, the radar sub-system comprises a plurality of transmitter radar sub-systems configured in a vertical polarization plane and a plurality of receiver radar sub-systems configured in a horizontal polarization plane. Optionally, the plurality of transmitter radar sub-systems comprises a range of 30 to 60 transmitter radar sub-systems. Optionally, the plurality of receiver radar sub-systems comprises a range of 30 to 60 receiver radar sub-systems.
Optionally, the radar sub-system is configured to operate at a wavelength of 30 mm with a corresponding center frequency of 10 GHz.
Optionally, the at least one processor is configured to implement a tensor analysis method to analyze the scan data collected from the radar arrays and the metal detector scan data.
Optionally, the radar subsystem is operated in a Stepped Frequency Continuous Wave (SFCW) mode.
The present specification also discloses a method of scanning baggage moving on the conveyor through a scanning tunnel defined by an aperture of a baggage scanning system comprising an ultra-wide band radar array and a metal detector surrounding the aperture, wherein the ultra-wide band radar array comprises a plurality of ultra-wide band radar sub-systems and the metal detector comprises a plurality of magnetic field generators and a plurality of magnetic field detectors, the method comprising: obtaining radar scan data comprising location and dielectric properties of an object in the baggage from the ultra-wide band radar arrays; obtaining metal detector scan data comprising at least one of detection, localization or characterization data of the object present in the baggage from the plurality of magnetic field detectors, wherein the object modifies the magnetic field generated by the plurality of magnetic field generators; correlating the radar scan data and the metal detector scan data for determining a location of one or more regions requiring further inspection in the baggage; and highlighting the one or more regions in an image of the baggage being scanned.
Optionally, the method further comprises one of: marking the baggage as suspicious for further manual search if one or more threat objects are present in the baggage; and clearing the baggage automatically if no threat objects are present in the baggage.
Optionally, obtaining radar scan data comprises operating the ultra-wide band radar array in a Stepped Frequency Continuous Wave mode.
Optionally, obtaining radar scan data comprises operating at least one of the plurality of ultra-wide band radar sub-systems in a transmit mode and at least one of the plurality of ultra-wide band radar sub-systems in a receive mode.
Optionally, obtaining radar scan data comprises: obtaining frequency, amplitude, and phase scan data for one or more receiver-transmitter pairs of the ultra-wide band radar sub-systems; generating a time-amplitude plot for each of the one or more transmitter-receiver pairs; and determining a calibration point and range data to each point on the surface of the baggage from the time-amplitude plot for each of the one or more transmitter-receiver pairs.
Optionally, the plurality of magnetic field generators and the plurality of magnetic field detectors are positioned at a top of the aperture and at a bottom of the aperture.
Optionally, the plurality of magnetic field generators and the plurality of magnetic field detectors are positioned below the conveyor.
Optionally, each of the plurality of magnetic field generators comprises a linear array of magnetic field transmitter coils and each of the plurality of magnetic field detectors comprises a linear array of magnetic field receiver coils.
Optionally, the plurality of ultra-wide band radar sub-systems comprises a plurality of transmitter radar sub-systems configured in a vertical polarization plane and a plurality of receiver radar sub-systems configured in a horizontal polarization plane. Optionally, the plurality of transmitter radar sub-systems comprises a range of 30 to 60 transmitter radar sub-systems. Optionally, the plurality of receiver radar sub-systems comprises a range of 30 to 60 receiver radar sub-systems. Optionally, the plurality of ultra-wide band radar sub-systems is configured to operate at a wavelength of 30 mm with a corresponding center frequency of 10 GHz.
The present specification also discloses a baggage scanning system comprising: an aperture defining a scanning tunnel; a conveyor moving through the scanning tunnel, a baggage being scanned moving on the conveyor; a UWB radar array surrounding the aperture for providing radar scan data corresponding to the baggage; a metal detector positioned at a location around the baggage allowing obtaining of metal detector scan data corresponding to the baggage; and at least a processor for correlating the radar scan data and the metal detector scan data for providing one or more suspicious regions highlighted over a video image of the baggage being scanned.
Optionally, the UWB radar array comprises a plurality of UWB radar sub-systems. Optionally, the UWB radar subsystems are operated in a Stepped Frequency Continuous Wave (SFCW) mode. Optionally, at least one of the UWB radar sub-systems is operated in a transmit mode and at least one of the UWB radar sub-systems is operated in a receive mode.
Optionally, the radar scan data comprises location and dielectric properties of a threat object in the baggage.
Optionally, the metal detector comprises a plurality of magnetic field generators and magnetic field detectors positioned at least on two opposing sides of the aperture. Optionally, each of the magnetic field generators comprises a linear array of magnetic field transmitter coils and each of the magnetic field detectors comprises a linear array of magnetic field receiver coils. Optionally, the linear arrays of magnetic field generators and transmitter coils are positioned on the top and bottom of the aperture. Optionally, the linear arrays of magnetic field generators and transmitter coils are positioned below the conveyor.
Optionally, the metal detector scan data comprises detection, localization and characterization data of objects present in the baggage.
The present specification also discloses a baggage scanning system comprising: an aperture defining a scanning tunnel; a conveyor moving through the scanning tunnel, a baggage being scanned moving on the conveyor; an Ultra-Wide Band (UWB) radar array surrounding the aperture, the UWB radar array comprising a plurality of UWB radar sub-systems for providing radar scan data comprising location and dielectric properties of a threat object in the baggage; an X-ray detection system comprising at least a first and a second X-ray sources, wherein the X-ray sources are positioned in the scanning tunnel to project X-ray beams in up-shooter and side-shooter configurations; and at least a processor for correlating the radar scan data and the X-ray detection data for providing one or more suspicious regions highlighted over a video image of the baggage being scanned.
Optionally, the UWB radar sub-system comprises at least a Vivaldi antenna coupled with an electronics drive circuit.
Optionally, the UWB radar sub-system is operated in frequency modulated continuous wave mode (FMCW) with a 10 GHz bandwidth and operating frequency ranging from 5 GHz to 15 GHz.
Optionally, the UWB radar sub-system can be selected to operate in either transmit mode or receive mode.
The present specification also discloses a baggage scanning system comprising: an aperture defining a scanning tunnel; a conveyor moving through the scanning tunnel, a baggage being scanned moving on the conveyor; a UWB radar array surrounding the aperture, the UWB radar array comprising a plurality of UWB radar sub-systems for providing radar scan data comprising location and dielectric properties of a threat object in the baggage; a metal detection system comprising: at least a plurality of magnetic field generators and a plurality of magnetic field detectors positioned respectively at least on two opposing sides of the aperture; and a processor for enabling generation of a magnetic field via the magnetic field generators and measuring the magnetic field modified by the baggage by using the magnetic field detectors, for obtaining metal detector scan data; and at least a processor for correlating the radar scan data and the metal detector scan data for providing one or more suspicious regions highlighted over a video image of the baggage being scanned.
Optionally, the aperture is 640 mm wide and 420 mm high.
Optionally, a length of the scanning tunnel is 1200 mm.
Optionally, the metal detector scan data comprises localization and characterization data of objects present in the baggage.
Optionally, the plurality of magnetic field generators and the plurality of magnetic field detectors are positioned on the top and bottom of the aperture.
Optionally, the plurality of magnetic field generators and the plurality of magnetic field detectors are positioned below the conveyor.
Optionally, the UWB radar sub-system comprises at least a Vivaldi antenna coupled with an electronics drive circuit.
Optionally, the UWB radar sub-system is operated in frequency modulated continuous wave mode (FMCW) with a 10 GHz bandwidth and operating frequency ranging from 5 GHz to 15 GHz.
Optionally, the UWB radar sub-system can be selected to operate in either transmit mode or receive mode.
Optionally, each of the magnetic field generators comprises a magnetic field transmitter coil and each of the magnetic field detectors comprises a magnetic field receiver coil.
Optionally, the UWB radar sub-system comprises 44 transmitter UWB radar sub-systems configured in a vertical polarization plane and 40 receiver UWB radar sub-systems configured in a horizontal polarization plane, UWB radar sub-system operating at a wavelength of 30 mm with a corresponding center frequency of 10 GHz.
Optionally, the scan data collected from the UWB radar arrays and the metal detector scan data are analyzed by using tensor analysis method.
Optionally, the UWB radar subsystem is operated in a Stepped Frequency Continuous Wave (SFCW) mode.
The present specification also discloses a method of scanning baggage moving on the conveyor through a scanning tunnel defined by an aperture of a baggage scanning system comprising: a UWB radar array and a metal detector surrounding the aperture, the UWB radar array comprising a plurality of UWB radar sub-systems, the metal detector comprising a plurality of magnetic field generators and a plurality of magnetic field detectors, the method comprising: obtaining radar scan data comprising location and dielectric properties of a threat object in the baggage from the UWB radar arrays; obtaining metal detector scan data comprising detection, localization and characterization data of objects present in the baggage from the magnetic field detectors, the objects modifying the magnetic field generated by the magnetic field generators; and correlating the radar scan data and the metal detector scan data for providing one or more suspicious regions highlighted over a video image of the baggage being scanned.
Optionally the method further comprises one of: marking the baggage as suspicious for further manual search if one or more threat objects are present in the baggage; and clearing the baggage automatically if no threat objects are present in the baggage.
Optionally, the step of obtaining radar scan data comprises operating the UWB radar subsystem in a Stepped Frequency Continuous Wave (SFCW) mode.
Optionally, the step of obtaining radar scan data comprises operating at least one of the UWB radar sub-systems in a transmit mode and at least one of the UWB radar sub-systems in a receive mode.
Optionally, the step of obtaining radar scan data comprises: obtaining frequency/amplitude/phase scan data for each receiver-transmitter pair of a UWB radar sub-system; obtaining a time-amplitude plot for each transmitter-receiver pair by using a standard transformation on the obtained frequency/amplitude/phase scan data; and determining a calibration point and range data to each point on the surface of the baggage from the time-amplitude plot for each transmitter-receiver pair.
Optionally, the plurality of magnetic field generators and the plurality of magnetic field detectors are positioned on the top and bottom of the aperture.
Optionally, the plurality of magnetic field generators and the plurality of magnetic field detectors are positioned below the conveyor.
Optionally, each of the magnetic field generators comprises a linear array of magnetic field transmitter coil and each of the magnetic field detectors comprises a linear array of magnetic field receiver coil.
Optionally, the UWB radar sub-system comprises 44 transmitter UWB radar sub-systems configured in a vertical polarization plane and 40 receiver UWB radar sub-systems configured in a horizontal polarization plane, UWB radar sub-system operating at a wavelength of 30 mm with a corresponding center frequency of 10 GHz.
The present specification also discloses a baggage scanning system comprising: an aperture defining a scanning tunnel; a conveyor moving through the scanning tunnel, a baggage being scanned moving on the conveyor; a UWB radar array surrounding the aperture for providing radar scan data corresponding to the baggage; a metal detector positioned at a location around the baggage allowing obtaining of metal detector scan data corresponding to the baggage; and at least a processor for correlating the radar scan data and the metal detector scan data for providing one or more suspicious regions highlighted over a video image of the baggage being scanned.
Optionally, the UWB radar array comprises a plurality of UWB radar sub-systems. The UWB radar subsystems may be operated in a Stepped Frequency Continuous Wave (SFCW) mode. Optionally, at least one of the UWB radar sub-systems may be operated in a transmit mode and at least one of the UWB radar sub-systems may be operated in a receive mode.
Optionally, the radar scan data comprises location and dielectric properties of a threat object in the baggage.
Optionally, the metal detector comprises a plurality of magnetic field generators and magnetic field detectors positioned at least on two opposing sides of the aperture. Each of the magnetic field generators may comprise a linear array of magnetic field transmitter coil and each of the magnetic field detectors may comprise a linear array of magnetic field receiver coil.
Optionally, the metal detector scan data comprises detection, localization and characterization data of objects present in the baggage.
Optionally, the linear arrays of magnetic field generator and transmitter coils are positioned on the top and bottom of the aperture.
Optionally, the linear arrays of magnetic field generator and transmitter coils are positioned below the conveyor.
The aforementioned and other embodiments of the present specification shall be described in greater depth in the drawings and detailed description provided below.
These and other features and advantages of the present specification will be further appreciated, as they become better understood by reference to the following detailed description when considered in connection with the accompanying drawings:
In embodiments, the present specification provides a baggage scanning system comprising ultra-wide band (UWB) radar inspection coupled with localizing, characterizing, metal detection (LCMD).
In embodiments, the present specification provides an X-ray baggage scanning system coupled with a radar or an ultra-wide band (UWB) radar inspection system.
The present specification is directed towards multiple embodiments. The following disclosure is provided in order to enable a person having ordinary skill in the art to practice the invention. Language used in this specification should not be interpreted as a general disavowal of any one specific embodiment or used to limit the claims beyond the meaning of the terms used therein. The general principles defined herein may be applied to other embodiments and applications without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. Also, the terminology and phraseology used is for the purpose of describing exemplary embodiments and should not be considered limiting. Thus, the present invention is to be accorded the widest scope encompassing numerous alternatives, modifications and equivalents consistent with the principles and features disclosed. For purpose of clarity, details relating to technical material that is known in the technical fields related to the invention have not been described in detail so as not to unnecessarily obscure the present invention.
In the description and claims of the application, each of the words “comprise” “include” and “have”, and forms thereof, are not necessarily limited to members in a list with which the words may be associated. It should be noted herein that any feature or component described in association with a specific embodiment may be used and implemented with any other embodiment unless clearly indicated otherwise.
As used herein, the indefinite articles “a” and “an” mean “at least one” or “one or more” unless the context clearly dictates otherwise.
In embodiments, the baggage scanning system of the present specification comprises an ultra-wide band (UWB) radar inspection having a radar transceiver system which includes a plurality of transmitting (Tx) and receiving (Rx) antenna elements. However, in other embodiments, the baggage scanning system comprises a plurality of antenna elements, wherein each antenna element is capable of producing and transmitting electromagnetic radiation and each is capable of receiving and capturing reflected radiation. Some embodiments may include implementation of a fully integrated, FCC compliant transceiver system including a plurality of transmitter elements Tx fully integrated with an array of power amplifiers and corresponding antenna arrays to form spatial power combining and narrow beam forming; and including a plurality of receiver elements Rx fully integrated with an array of low noise amplifiers and corresponding antenna arrays to form spatial power combining from a reflected signal. Various embodiments may include implementation of an array of polarized miniature antenna elements that enable system capabilities for analysis of scanned material and differentiation and classification of scanned material according to radar signature profiles, point cloud images or radar scan information.
In some embodiments, each transceiver of the radar transceiver system may be a UWB (Ultra Wide Band) radar transceiver operating at a center frequency, for example, of about 60 GHz, with a total bandwidth that is preferably greater than 20% of the center frequency. In some embodiments, the radar transceiver system may transmit a radar signal in X-band (for example, about 8-12 gigahertz (GHz)), V-band (for example, about 40-75 gigahertz (GHz)), E-band (for example, including two bands of about 71-76 and 81-86 GHz), W-band (for example, about 75-110 GHz), or terahertz (for example, about 300-3000 GHz) frequency bands. Some embodiments may employ 5 GHz ultra wideband (UWB) radar operating at 1-6 GHz, for example, or 3-6 GHz.
In various embodiments, the transceiver system may use one or more of the aforementioned bands of frequencies. For example, some embodiments may use radiation in the X-band for low resolution, high penetration imaging and E-band for high resolution, low penetration imaging. Accordingly, the UWB radar transceiver may operate with a center frequency in a range of 1 to 3000 GHz in one or more continuous or discontinuous bands. Optionally, the UWB radar transceiver may operate with a center frequency in a range of 1 to 3000 GHz with a total bandwidth that is preferably greater than 20% of the center frequency in one or more continuous or discontinuous bands. Optionally, the UWB radar transceiver may operate with a center frequency in a range of 1 to 3000 GHz with a total bandwidth that is preferably occupies more than 500 Hz of spectrum in one or more continuous or discontinuous bands.
In embodiments, the baggage scanning system of the present specification further includes at least one processor, computer-readable medium or memory and a display. The processor includes any hardware, software, firmware, or combination thereof for controlling the radar transceiver system and processing the received electromagnetic radiation reflected from the baggage being inspected. For example, the processor may include one or more microprocessors, microcontrollers, programmable logic devices, digital signal processors or other type of processing devices that are configured to execute instructions of a computer program, and one or more memories (for example, cache memory) that store the instructions and other data used by the processor. The memory includes any type of data storage device, including but not limited to, a hard drive, random access memory (RAM), read only memory (ROM), compact disc, floppy disc, ZIP.RTM. drive, tape drive, database or other type of storage device or storage medium.
In an embodiment, the present specification provides a baggage scanning system comprising an ultra-wide band (UWB) radar inspection sub-system coupled with a metal detector. In an embodiment the metal detector is a localizing, characterizing, metal detection (LCMD) sub-system, as illustrated in
In various embodiments, scanner 100 provides a low cost, zero health hazard, carry-on baggage scanning system for use with relatively untrained operators for directed search on a fraction of scanned bags, based on large potential threat items. Scanner 100 may be deployed in potentially high threat areas such as, but not limited to, critical infrastructure, special events, crowded areas such as shopping malls and the aviation sector.
As shown, scanner 100 comprises an aperture 102 defining a scanning volume through which a conveyor 104 is configured to move. In an embodiment, the conveyor 104 is comprised of plastic material that is radio-transparent. A radar array formed from multiple individual radar sub-systems 106 is located around the perimeter of aperture 102. A metal detection subsystem comprising magnetic field sensor modules 110 is located on at least two opposing sides of the aperture 102 as shown in
The linear arrays of magnetic field transmitter and receiver coils are positioned so that a long edge of one coil sits at the center of the adjacent coil, such that, if the total coil width is 10 cm, the individual coils would be positioned at a spacing of 5 cm. In embodiments the height of the coils ranges between 5 cm to 15 cm. However, in alternate embodiments, the magnetic field sensor modules may be randomly or quasi-randomly spaced from one another. The magnetic field sensor arrays enable detection, localization and characterization of conductive non-ferrous metallic targets as well as ferromagnetic objects present in the baggage moving on the conveyor 104 through the aperture 102.
In various embodiments, the radar array and the magnetic field sensor modules array are concealed within a housing. In an embodiment, the aperture 102 is 640 mm wide and 420 mm high and may range from a first dimension of 400 to 800 mm by a second dimension of 300 to 600 mm and every increment therein. In an embodiment, a maximum width 112 of the unit is 940 mm with a maximum height 114 of 1250 mm from floor level and conveyor height 116 of 100 mm from floor level. In various embodiments, the width 112 is approximately 100 mm and the height 114 is approximately 1000 mm above floor level. An interconnect panel 118 is provided on the body of scanner 100 for at least, but not limited to, the following connections: input power, a circuit breaker, USB data storage and an Ethernet connection.
In an embodiment, baggage being scanned is kept on the conveyor 104 and moves at a scanning speed of 250 mm/s. In an embodiment, the scanning speed ranges from 0.1 m/s to 0.5 m/s. The baggage passes through an imaging plane, and a three-dimensional radar scan of the baggage is collected via the radar array in real time. The radar data is analyzed for the presence of threat materials. In parallel, a set magnetic field data is collected via the magnetic field sensor arrays and this data is also analyzed for threat and innocuous items. In an embodiment, the baggage being scanned is either marked as suspicious for further manual search or is cleared automatically.
In various embodiments, no actual radar-based or magnetic field-based scanning image is shown to an operator operating the scanner 100. However, a suspicious region and probable threat type determined by either one or both of the sensors is highlighted automatically over a video image of the baggage that is also presented in real-time to the operator.
In an embodiment, as shown in
In order to constrain the solver or matrix inversion problem, it is efficient to provide the algorithm with the three-dimensional shape of the baggage under inspection. This is efficiently achieved by using a video camera system in which a grid of infra-red beams is projected onto the surface of the baggage as it passes through the scanning/imaging system of the present specification and from the distortion of these beams which are observed by the video camera, a surface profile can be determined. Other mechanisms are known to those skilled in the art, such as projecting divergent infra-red pencil beams onto the baggage surface and measuring the distance between interacting spots from these beams.
The baggage is then described in terms of a suitable coordinate system, such as a 3D Cartesian matrix. Alternative systems, such as cylindrical coordinates, can also be useful.
Taking into account phase and frequency information, as well as spatial information, the tensor properties or dielectric signatures (such as the dielectric constant, conductivity, permittivity, permeability and/or reflectivity) of the baggage under inspection are determined. In embodiments, all properties of the items, which are real and imaginary components of the magnetic field may be determined. The tensor characteristics are different for every type of object, observed from different axes of symmetry. For example, a gun has two axes of symmetry, a knife has only one axis of symmetry, and a coin is a flat object with no axes of symmetry. In case of two objects, such as a knife and a gun lying close to each other, in an embodiment, the nearest neighbor in the library of tensor values is identified for characterizing the objects. In an embodiment, an alarm is generated based on one or more parameters, such as the location/position and/or the dielectric signature or said tensor properties, as the characteristic data for the baggage.
A classification method is applied to the characteristic data for this purpose. The classification method is used to determine the significance of the threat (whether the object is innocuous, benign, explosive, weapon, Improvised Explosive Device) and the category or type of the threat (mobile phone, passport, explosive material, and/or knife). Classification techniques that use tensor values, known to persons of ordinary skill in the art, may be used to determine the threat nature of the measured set of tensor properties/dielectric signatures and the residual error between the model and measurements can also be used to provide a confidence parameter on the classification.
In an embodiment, the scan data obtained from the UWB system is analyzed to determine the radar wavelength cross section of the various objects covered by the radar beam being used to scan a baggage item. In various embodiments, a complex object, such as an IED, is likely to be a mixture of dielectric material and metallic fragments and so have a very complex radar signature (such as the dielectric constant, conductivity, permittivity, permeability and/or reflectivity) and an associated tensor value. A simple dielectric material, such as a bottle of water or liquid explosive precursor, will have a less complex radar signature.
In various embodiments, by operating in the UWB frequency range, the radar wavelengths are of the same order of magnitude as the size of common threat objects (5 GHz=60 mm, 15 GHz=20 mm) and this ensure that at particular frequencies strong coupling will occur, and this information is used to determine material permittivity. In an embodiment, an image reconstruction algorithm is used for determining a size of each threat object (which depends on the frequency at which the radiation couples). The reconstruction algorithm then determines the slowing down of the radar signal which depends on the permittivity of a threat object, and uses a combination of these two effects measured from all directions for calculating both size and permittivity of the threat object. This information is used, along with the tensor data, to determine the material type under inspection (e.g. H2O or H2O2).
In an embodiment, the UWB radar subsystem is operated in a Stepped Frequency Continuous Wave (SFCW) mode. In radar-based microwave imaging, wideband pulses are synthetically created using a stepped frequency continuous wave (SFCW) varying over the entire wideband frequency range.
Since the velocity of propagation of a transmitted electromagnetic beam through a threat object is dependent on its dielectric property (the velocity of propagation is slowed as it passes through the object), the surface of the baggage appears to be indented behind the object in direct proportion to the relative permittivity/dielectric property of the threat object. This information is used in reconstructing the threat location, shape, size and type in subsequent signal analysis procedures. In accordance with an embodiment, a projection of ultra wide band radio frequencies from each transmitter element to the array of detection/receiver elements allows the physical location and dimensions of a potential threat object located in a pocket or on the surface of the body of the person to be determined using simple ray tracing methods known to persons of ordinary skill in the art. Alternately, in the frequency domain, it is known to persons skilled in the art that the strongest interaction of a radio frequency signal with a dielectric object occurs at an integer divisor of the wavelength of the electromagnetic beam. Therefore, in one embodiment, the dimension of an object is determined by spectral analysis of the reflected electromagnetic beam—wherein a plurality of notches due to object attenuation is characteristic of the dimensions of the object.
In accordance with various aspects, a plurality of radar based scanning and imaging systems, are networked together for communication through a centralized processing or server system.
At step 425 a 3D image of the object being scanned is determined by using the obtained calibration point and range data. In an embodiment, a range map using the UWB data recorded at each receiver from each transmitter at each frequency is constructed by using any back projection algorithm. It is known that, for a radar system, range resolution=(c/2.B) where ‘c’ denotes the speed of light and ‘B’ denotes bandwidth. In an embodiment, by using a UWB radar sub-system having a 10 GHz bandwidth, a 15 mm range resolution may be obtained. In an embodiment, the range data is oversampled by using multiple transmitters and multiple receivers. Hence, the net range error is less than 15 mm, and in an embodiment is 5 mm, resulting in a 5 mm×5 mm×5 mm voxel dimensions in the tomographic like 3D radar surface image. This allows determining the volume of any object, its 3D location within the inspection tunnel, and its dielectric and tensor properties. At step 430 scan data obtained from the metal detection magnetic field sensor arrays is spatially correlated with the 3D image obtained from the UWB radar arrays to reduce false alarms related to presence of threat items in the object being scanned. In an embodiment, metallic objects from the LCMD sub-system are locatable to approximately 10 mm accuracy and dielectric objects from the radar sub-system are locatable to approximately 5 mm accuracy. Hence, the two sets of data can be spatially co-related.
In accordance with another aspect, the non-ionizing radiation based scanning and imaging system 100 (
Embodiments of the figure, in accordance with the present specification, provide an ability to detect both dimensionality, through X-ray detection, and a combination of reflectivity, permittivity, and dielectric, through radar detection. During operation, the X-ray scan data enables determination of dimensions and radiographic images (from dual views) of suspicious items concealed within the object 502. The side-shooter configuration also enables determination of a thickness of items within the object 502 apart from revealing radiographic information. For example, X-ray scanning of a laptop may reveal two separate areas in the battery compartment of the laptop, thereby raising a red flag. In such a scenario, dielectric signature information (such as permittivity and reflectivity) generated using the radar transceiver system 520 is utilized to further localize and characterize presence of a dielectric threat substance, such as a liquid and/or plastic based explosive for example, is concealed in the battery compartment.
The above examples are merely illustrative of the many applications of the methods and systems of present specification. Although only a few embodiments of the present invention have been described herein, it should be understood that the present invention might be embodied in many other specific forms without departing from the spirit or scope of the invention. Therefore, the present examples and embodiments are to be considered as illustrative and not restrictive, and the invention may be modified within the scope of the appended claims.
The present application relies on U.S. Patent Provisional Application No. 62/702,833, entitled “Passive, Walk-Through Metal Detection System” and filed on Jul. 24, 2018, for priority. The present application also relies on U.S. Patent Provisional Application No. 62/702,841 entitled “Radar-Based Inspection System” and filed on Jul. 24, 2018, for priority. The present application also relies on U.S. Patent Provisional Application No. 62/702,868 entitled “Radar-Based Baggage and Parcel Inspection Systems” and filed on Jul. 24, 2018, for priority. The present specification is also a continuation-in-part application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/859,777, entitled “Ultra Wide Band Detectors”, filed on Jan. 2, 2018, which in turn, is a continuation application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/639,956, entitled “Ultra Wide Band Detectors”, filed on Mar. 5, 2015, and issued as U.S. Pat. No. 9,891,314 on Feb. 13, 2018, which, in turn, relies on U.S. Patent Provisional No. 61/949,775, entitled “Ultra-Wide Band Detectors”, and filed on Mar. 7, 2014, for priority. The present application relates to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/625,925, entitled “Detector Systems”, filed on Jun. 16, 2017, and issued as U.S. Pat. No. 10,107,783 on Oct. 23, 2018, which is a continuation application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/020,317, of the same title, filed on Sep. 6, 2013, and issued as U.S. Pat. No. 9,714,920 on Jul. 25, 2017, which is a continuation application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/523,051, of the same title, filed on Jul. 13, 2009, and issued as U.S. Pat. No. 8,552,722 on Oct. 8, 2013, which is a national stage application of PCT Application No. PCT/GB2008/000116, filed on Jan. 15, 2008, which relies on Great Britain Patent Application Number 0703481.2, filed on Feb. 22, 2007 and Great Britain Patent Application Number 0700731.3, filed on Jan. 15, 2007, for priority. All of the above-mentioned patents and patent applications are herein incorporated by reference in their entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
745140 | Fredrick | Nov 1903 | A |
1552622 | Leslie | Sep 1925 | A |
3551675 | Miller, Jr. | Dec 1970 | A |
3655013 | Weller | Apr 1972 | A |
3655215 | Becklin | Apr 1972 | A |
3660663 | Guildford | May 1972 | A |
3678278 | Peil | Jul 1972 | A |
3780291 | Stein | Dec 1973 | A |
3790799 | Stein | Feb 1974 | A |
3843881 | Barton | Oct 1974 | A |
3884816 | Takahashi | May 1975 | A |
3919467 | Peugeot | Nov 1975 | A |
3924064 | Nomura | Dec 1975 | A |
3961186 | Leunbach | Jun 1976 | A |
3971948 | Pfeiler | Jul 1976 | A |
3990175 | Conway | Nov 1976 | A |
4008400 | Brunnett | Feb 1977 | A |
4020346 | Dennis | Apr 1977 | A |
4031545 | Stein | Jun 1977 | A |
4047035 | Dennhoven | Sep 1977 | A |
4064440 | Roder | Dec 1977 | A |
4070576 | Cobb | Jan 1978 | A |
4107532 | Macovski | Aug 1978 | A |
4112301 | Annis | Sep 1978 | A |
4139771 | Dennhoven | Feb 1979 | A |
4160165 | Mccombs | Jul 1979 | A |
4179100 | Sashin | Dec 1979 | A |
4196352 | Berninger | Apr 1980 | A |
4200800 | Swift | Apr 1980 | A |
4228353 | Johnson | Oct 1980 | A |
4228357 | Annis | Oct 1980 | A |
4242583 | Annis | Dec 1980 | A |
4242588 | Huang | Dec 1980 | A |
4260898 | Annis | Apr 1981 | A |
4298800 | Goldman | Nov 1981 | A |
4303830 | Heinzelmann | Dec 1981 | A |
4342914 | Bjorkholm | Aug 1982 | A |
4349739 | Annis | Sep 1982 | A |
4357535 | Haas | Nov 1982 | A |
4366382 | Kotowski | Dec 1982 | A |
4366576 | Annis | Dec 1982 | A |
4380817 | Harding | Apr 1983 | A |
4389729 | Stein | Jun 1983 | A |
4414682 | Annis | Nov 1983 | A |
4422177 | Mastronardi | Dec 1983 | A |
4426721 | Wang | Jan 1984 | A |
4454605 | Delucia | Jun 1984 | A |
4472822 | Swift | Sep 1984 | A |
4503332 | Annis | Mar 1985 | A |
4514691 | De | Apr 1985 | A |
4525854 | Molbert | Jun 1985 | A |
4535245 | Zonneveld | Aug 1985 | A |
4549307 | Macovski | Oct 1985 | A |
4578806 | Grass | Mar 1986 | A |
4586441 | Zekich | May 1986 | A |
4598415 | Luccio | Jul 1986 | A |
4605898 | Savolainen | Aug 1986 | A |
4672837 | Cottrell | Jun 1987 | A |
4692937 | Sashin | Sep 1987 | A |
4711994 | Greenberg | Dec 1987 | A |
4736401 | Donges | Apr 1988 | A |
4745631 | Paolini | May 1988 | A |
4756015 | Doenges | Jul 1988 | A |
4759047 | Donges | Jul 1988 | A |
4768214 | Bjorkholm | Aug 1988 | A |
4783794 | Dietrich | Nov 1988 | A |
4799247 | Annis | Jan 1989 | A |
4807637 | Bjorkholm | Feb 1989 | A |
4809312 | Annis | Feb 1989 | A |
4817121 | Shimizu | Mar 1989 | A |
4819256 | Annis | Apr 1989 | A |
4821023 | Parks | Apr 1989 | A |
4825454 | Annis | Apr 1989 | A |
4839913 | Annis | Jun 1989 | A |
4841555 | Doi | Jun 1989 | A |
4845769 | Burstein | Jul 1989 | A |
4864142 | Gomberg | Sep 1989 | A |
4870670 | Geus | Sep 1989 | A |
4884289 | Glockmann | Nov 1989 | A |
4890310 | Umetani | Dec 1989 | A |
4893015 | Kubierschky | Jan 1990 | A |
4894619 | Leinonen | Jan 1990 | A |
4899283 | Annis | Feb 1990 | A |
4906973 | Karbowski | Mar 1990 | A |
4961214 | Van | Oct 1990 | A |
4974247 | Friddell | Nov 1990 | A |
4979137 | Gerstenfeld | Dec 1990 | A |
4995066 | Harding | Feb 1991 | A |
5007072 | Jenkins | Apr 1991 | A |
5022062 | Annis | Jun 1991 | A |
5033073 | Friddell | Jul 1991 | A |
5038370 | Harding | Aug 1991 | A |
5039981 | Rodriguez | Aug 1991 | A |
5044002 | Stein | Aug 1991 | A |
5047718 | Aittoniemi | Sep 1991 | A |
5076993 | Sawa | Dec 1991 | A |
5084619 | Pfeiler | Jan 1992 | A |
5115459 | Bertozzi | May 1992 | A |
5120706 | Weeks | Jun 1992 | A |
5121105 | Aittoniemi | Jun 1992 | A |
5127030 | Annis | Jun 1992 | A |
5132995 | Stein | Jul 1992 | A |
5149114 | Lewandowski | Sep 1992 | A |
5156270 | Kachel | Oct 1992 | A |
5179581 | Annis | Jan 1993 | A |
5181234 | Smith | Jan 1993 | A |
5182764 | Peschmann | Jan 1993 | A |
5212720 | Landi | May 1993 | A |
5224144 | Annis | Jun 1993 | A |
5227800 | Huguenin | Jul 1993 | A |
5243693 | Maron | Sep 1993 | A |
5247561 | Kotowski | Sep 1993 | A |
5253283 | Annis | Oct 1993 | A |
5260982 | Fujii | Nov 1993 | A |
5313511 | Annis | May 1994 | A |
5367552 | Peschmann | Nov 1994 | A |
5394454 | Harding | Feb 1995 | A |
5397986 | Conway | Mar 1995 | A |
5414225 | Garfinkle | May 1995 | A |
5420905 | Bertozzi | May 1995 | A |
5430787 | Norton | Jul 1995 | A |
5463224 | Burstein | Oct 1995 | A |
5483569 | Annis | Jan 1996 | A |
5490196 | Rudich | Feb 1996 | A |
5490218 | Krug | Feb 1996 | A |
5493596 | Annis | Feb 1996 | A |
5503424 | Agopian | Apr 1996 | A |
5524133 | Neale | Jun 1996 | A |
5528656 | Annis | Jun 1996 | A |
5572121 | Beswick | Nov 1996 | A |
5579360 | Abdel-Mottaleb | Nov 1996 | A |
5590057 | Fletcher | Dec 1996 | A |
5600303 | Husseiny | Feb 1997 | A |
5600700 | Krug | Feb 1997 | A |
5602893 | Harding | Feb 1997 | A |
5638420 | Armistead | Jun 1997 | A |
5642393 | Krug | Jun 1997 | A |
5642394 | Rothschild | Jun 1997 | A |
5660549 | Witt | Aug 1997 | A |
5666393 | Annis | Sep 1997 | A |
5692028 | Geus | Nov 1997 | A |
5692029 | Husseiny | Nov 1997 | A |
5696806 | Grodzins | Dec 1997 | A |
5699400 | Lee | Dec 1997 | A |
5763886 | Schulte | Jun 1998 | A |
5764683 | Swift | Jun 1998 | A |
5790685 | Sallee | Aug 1998 | A |
5796110 | An | Aug 1998 | A |
5838758 | Krug | Nov 1998 | A |
5882206 | Gillio | Mar 1999 | A |
5892840 | Jang | Apr 1999 | A |
5910973 | Grodzins | Jun 1999 | A |
5930326 | Rothschild | Jul 1999 | A |
5940468 | Huang | Aug 1999 | A |
5966422 | Dafni | Oct 1999 | A |
5974111 | Krug | Oct 1999 | A |
6018562 | Willson | Jan 2000 | A |
6044353 | Pugliese | Mar 2000 | A |
6057761 | Yukl | May 2000 | A |
6081580 | Grodzins | Jun 2000 | A |
6094472 | Smith | Jul 2000 | A |
6137895 | Al-Sheikh | Oct 2000 | A |
6138815 | Reiners | Oct 2000 | A |
6151381 | Grodzins | Nov 2000 | A |
6192104 | Adams | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6212251 | Tomura | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6236709 | Perry | May 2001 | B1 |
6249567 | Rothschild | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6269142 | Smith | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6272206 | Bjorkholm | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6278115 | Annis | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6282260 | Grodzins | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6282264 | Smith | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6292533 | Swift | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6298603 | Diaz | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6301326 | Bjorkholm | Oct 2001 | B2 |
6301327 | Martens | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6308644 | Diaz | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6315308 | Konopka | Nov 2001 | B1 |
RE37467 | Brasch | Dec 2001 | E |
6356620 | Rothschild | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6366203 | Burns | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6370222 | Cornick | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6375697 | Davies | Apr 2002 | B2 |
6393095 | Robinson | May 2002 | B1 |
6418194 | Mcpherson | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6421420 | Grodzins | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6424695 | Grodzins | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6434219 | Rothschild | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6442233 | Grodzins | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6453007 | Adams | Sep 2002 | B2 |
6459761 | Grodzins | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6459764 | Chalmers | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6472984 | Risi | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6473487 | Le | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6484650 | Stomski | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6507278 | Brunetti | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6540064 | Bodewes | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6542574 | Grodzins | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6543599 | Jasinetzky | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6546072 | Chalmers | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6552346 | Verbinski | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6553096 | Zhou | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6556653 | Hussein | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6567496 | Sychev | May 2003 | B1 |
6597760 | Beneke | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6610977 | Megerle | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6621888 | Grodzins | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6628745 | Annis | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6634668 | Urffer | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6653588 | Gillard-Hickman | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6665373 | Kotowski | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6674367 | Sweatte | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6707879 | Mcclelland | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6721391 | Mcclelland | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6742301 | Schwarz | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6745520 | Puskaric | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6749207 | Nadeau | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6754304 | Kumakhov | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6777684 | Volkov | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6785357 | Bernardi | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6785360 | Annis | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6819109 | Sowers | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6819241 | Turner | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6831603 | Menache | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6839403 | Kotowski | Jan 2005 | B1 |
6848826 | Marie | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6856667 | Ellenbogen | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6870791 | Caulfield | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6876719 | Ozaki | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6879657 | Hoffman | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6891381 | Bailey | May 2005 | B2 |
6899540 | Neiderman | May 2005 | B1 |
6900727 | Lee | May 2005 | B2 |
6901346 | Tracy | May 2005 | B2 |
6911907 | Kelliher | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6920197 | Kang | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6952163 | Huey | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6965340 | Baharav | Nov 2005 | B1 |
6967612 | Gorman | Nov 2005 | B1 |
6970086 | Nelson | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6970087 | Stis | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6980623 | Dunham | Dec 2005 | B2 |
6990175 | Nakashima | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7016459 | Ellenbogen | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7016473 | Linev | Mar 2006 | B1 |
7053785 | Akins | May 2006 | B2 |
7092485 | Kravis | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7099434 | Adams | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7102512 | Pendergraft | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7103137 | Seppi | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7110493 | Kotowski | Sep 2006 | B1 |
7110925 | Pendergraft | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7114849 | Atzinger | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7142638 | Polichar | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7143004 | Townsend | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7162005 | Bjorkholm | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7164747 | Ellenbogen | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7185206 | Goldstein | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7203276 | Arsenault | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7207713 | Lowman | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7218704 | Adams | May 2007 | B1 |
7257189 | Modica | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7263409 | Levasseur | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7265709 | Fleisher | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7286634 | Sommer | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7305062 | Hambuechen | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7305063 | Heuscher | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7317390 | Huey | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7322745 | Agrawal | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7330529 | Kautzer | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7333587 | De | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7356115 | Ford | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7365672 | Keller | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7400701 | Cason | Jul 2008 | B1 |
7418077 | Gray | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7460636 | Ein-Gal | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7471764 | Kaval | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7476023 | Canfield | Jan 2009 | B1 |
7505556 | Chalmers | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7505557 | Modica | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7505562 | Dinca | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7551709 | Schlomka | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7551715 | Rothschild | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7555099 | Rothschild | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7558370 | Sommer | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7561666 | Annis | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7577234 | Knoespel | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7593506 | Cason | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7593510 | Rothschild | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7595638 | Crowley | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7633518 | Beevor | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7639866 | Pomero | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7659851 | Dejean | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7660388 | Gray | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7671784 | Steinway | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7684544 | Wilson | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7783004 | Kotowski | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7796394 | Wang | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7796733 | Hughes | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7796734 | Mastronardi | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7806589 | Tashman | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7809109 | Mastronardi | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7817776 | Agrawal | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7826589 | Kotowski | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7984940 | Chen | Jul 2011 | B2 |
8003949 | Ryge | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8023726 | Sundaresan | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8054938 | Kaval | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8061599 | Daly | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8113071 | Sagi-Dolev | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8116575 | Saisan | Feb 2012 | B1 |
8135112 | Hughes | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8194822 | Rothschild | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8199996 | Hughes | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8275092 | Zhang | Sep 2012 | B1 |
8275093 | Rothschild | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8325871 | Grodzins | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8442186 | Rothschild | May 2013 | B2 |
8552722 | Lionheart | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8576982 | Gray | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8576989 | Kaminski | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8605859 | Mastronardi | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8638904 | Gray | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8654922 | Bendahan | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8731137 | Arroyo | May 2014 | B2 |
8995619 | Gray | Mar 2015 | B2 |
9020100 | Mastronardi | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9282258 | Kuznetsov | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9535019 | Rothschild | Jan 2017 | B1 |
9714920 | Lionheart | Jul 2017 | B2 |
9891314 | Morton | Feb 2018 | B2 |
10107783 | Lionheart | Oct 2018 | B2 |
20010021241 | Swift | Sep 2001 | A1 |
20020045152 | Viscardi | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020136353 | Kang | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20030012338 | Lienard | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030025302 | Urffer | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030080868 | Nelson | May 2003 | A1 |
20030171939 | Yagesh | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030204361 | Townsend | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030214407 | Sweatte | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030225612 | Desimone | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20030229506 | Scott | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040000999 | Turner | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040012494 | Lee | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040017313 | Menache | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040051265 | Nadeau | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040080315 | Beevor | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040088584 | Shachar | May 2004 | A1 |
20040090359 | Mcmakin | May 2004 | A1 |
20040109532 | Ford | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040120454 | Ellenbogen | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040125914 | Kang | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040175018 | Macarthur | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040252024 | Huey | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050024199 | Huey | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050031069 | Kaucic | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050074086 | Pendergraft | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050100135 | Lowman | May 2005 | A1 |
20050276379 | Polichar | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060109174 | Baharav | May 2006 | A1 |
20060182223 | Heuscher | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060214835 | Lee | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060262902 | Wattenburg | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070009088 | Edic | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070058037 | Bergeron | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070086564 | Bruder | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070098142 | Rothschild | May 2007 | A1 |
20070139248 | Baharav | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070159400 | Dejean | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070172026 | Schlomka | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070235652 | Smith | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20080054893 | Humphreys | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080088345 | Whetsel | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080144777 | Wilson | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080212742 | Hughes | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080303708 | Daly | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090041186 | Gray | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090073023 | Ammar | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090074138 | Knoespel | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090075325 | Das | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090082762 | Ormsby | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090103686 | Rothschild | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090116614 | Kotowski | May 2009 | A1 |
20090116617 | Mastronardi | May 2009 | A1 |
20090167042 | Chen | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090232353 | Sundaresan | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090245462 | Agrawal | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090252295 | Foland | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090257555 | Chalmers | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090278683 | Carter | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20100034451 | Hughes | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100067654 | Kotowski | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100158191 | Gray | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20110017917 | Mastronardi | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110080999 | Kaval | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110081099 | Hughes | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110096901 | Kotowski | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110102235 | Abdillah | May 2011 | A1 |
20110129063 | Bendahan | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110164726 | Mastronardi | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110234783 | Uemura | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110273320 | Nogueira-Nine | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110274249 | Gray | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110274250 | Gray | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110293072 | Kaminski | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110299659 | Gray | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120038666 | Evers | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120103061 | Nacson | May 2012 | A1 |
20120311939 | Barragan Olaya | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130006552 | Peyton | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20140028457 | Reinpoldt | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140063239 | Furness | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140185755 | Bendahan | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140339430 | Hillis | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20150186732 | Perron | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20160116581 | Mohamadi | Apr 2016 | A1 |
20190004170 | Morton | Jan 2019 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1245295 | Feb 2000 | CN |
1352919 | Jun 2002 | CN |
1490616 | Apr 2004 | CN |
1674204 | Sep 2005 | CN |
1715895 | Jan 2006 | CN |
1715895 | Jan 2006 | CN |
1732850 | Feb 2006 | CN |
1764987 | Apr 2006 | CN |
1764987 | Apr 2006 | CN |
1779442 | May 2006 | CN |
1802676 | Jul 2006 | CN |
1846151 | Oct 2006 | CN |
100593732 | Nov 2006 | CN |
101083757 | Dec 2007 | CN |
101379415 | Mar 2009 | CN |
101644687 | Feb 2010 | CN |
101644687 | Feb 2010 | CN |
101071109 | May 2010 | CN |
101467071 | Jun 2012 | CN |
101185006 | Jan 2013 | CN |
3141755 | Jul 1982 | DE |
19907758 | Aug 1999 | DE |
0261984 | Mar 1988 | EP |
0533316 | Mar 1993 | EP |
1635169 | Mar 2006 | EP |
1772874 | Apr 2007 | EP |
2520927 | Nov 2012 | EP |
2548011 | Jan 2013 | EP |
2548012 | Jan 2013 | EP |
3114464 | Jan 2017 | EP |
1283915 | Aug 1972 | GB |
S61190877 | Aug 1986 | JP |
H4313052 | Nov 1992 | JP |
H6265485 | Sep 1994 | JP |
H10185842 | Jul 1998 | JP |
2004150822 | May 2004 | JP |
2004251624 | Sep 2004 | JP |
2005501262 | Jan 2005 | JP |
2007163474 | Jun 2007 | JP |
2007517275 | Jun 2007 | JP |
2007532876 | Nov 2007 | JP |
2010008272 | Jan 2010 | JP |
2012524921 | Oct 2012 | JP |
2014029663 | Feb 2014 | JP |
1988000698 | Jan 1988 | WO |
9202937 | Feb 1992 | WO |
1992002937 | Feb 1992 | WO |
9701771 | Jan 1997 | WO |
1999021148 | Apr 1999 | WO |
0105685 | Jan 2001 | WO |
03048808 | Jun 2003 | WO |
03048815 | Jun 2003 | WO |
2004097456 | Nov 2004 | WO |
2004111963 | Dec 2004 | WO |
2005098400 | Oct 2005 | WO |
2006027122 | Mar 2006 | WO |
2009006044 | Jan 2009 | WO |
2009082762 | Jul 2009 | WO |
2009148637 | Dec 2009 | WO |
2010032003 | Mar 2010 | WO |
2011063059 | May 2011 | WO |
2011106745 | Sep 2011 | WO |
2011115923 | Sep 2011 | WO |
2011115930 | Sep 2011 | WO |
2011115934 | Sep 2011 | WO |
2011115935 | Sep 2011 | WO |
2013006373 | Jan 2013 | WO |
2013011282 | Jan 2013 | WO |
2014058495 | Apr 2014 | WO |
2015134802 | Sep 2015 | WO |
2020023603 | Jan 2020 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report for PCT/US2019/043184, dated Oct. 31, 2019. |
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority for PCT/US2019/043184, dated Oct. 31, 2019. |
International Search Report for PCT/US2008/067619, Rapiscan Security Products., dated Aug. 20, 2008. |
International Search Report for PCT/US2008/088345, Rapiscan Security Products., dated Apr. 3, 2009. |
Gerald J. Smith, ‘Bodysearch Technology Uses X-ray Imaging to Remove Hazards and Humiliation from Personnel Searches’, IEEE, 1995. |
ANSI, Radiation Safety for Personnel Security Screening Systems Using X-Rays, Apr. 3, 2002. |
Murray et al., ‘Exploitation of X-Ray Technology for the Detection of Contraband-Aviation Security Applications’, European Conference on Security and Detection, Apr. 28-30, 1997. |
International Search Report, PCT/US11/28411, dated Sep. 27, 2011, Rapiscan Systems Inc. |
International Search Report, PCT/US11/28393, dated Jul. 8, 2011, Rapiscan Systems Inc. |
International Search Report, PCT/US11/28413, dated Jul. 22, 2011, Rapiscan Systems Inc. |
CRS Report for Congress, Aviation Security Technologies and Procedures: Screening Passengers and Baggage, Oct. 26, 2001, pp. 1-12. |
International Search Report, PCT/US11/28403, dated Oct. 11, 2011, Rapiscan Systems Inc. |
International Search Report for PCT/US06/00623, dated Feb. 27, 2008, International Search Authority, pp. 12-13 of the report analyzes the materiality of certain references. |
Rapiscan Security Products, Secure 1000 Concealed Object Detection System, Nov. 1998. |
Rapiscan Security Products, Secure 1000 Brochure, 2002. |
Daniel Strom, “Screening Individuals with Backscatter X-Ray Systems”, Health Physics Society, Feb. 3, 2005. |
Rapiscan Systems Secure 1000 Case Study, London Heathrow Terminal 4, Fall 2004. |
MSNBC, “Airports Seek Hi-Tech Security”, Apr. 3, 2002. |
St. Bartholomew's Hospital, Radiation Safety Report on the Rapiscan Secure 1000 X-Ray System, Nov. 4, 2004. |
International Search Report, PCT/US2008/067619, dated Aug. 20, 2008, Rapiscan Security Products. |
International Search Report for PCT/US15/19049, dated Jun. 17, 2015. |
International Search Report for PCT/US13/50559, dated Mar. 27, 2014. |
International Search Report PCT/GB2008/000116, dated Nov. 17, 2009. |
International Search Report for PCT/US2011/026382, dated Jun. 30, 2011, Rapiscan Systems. |
Interational Search Report for PCT/US2012/044632, dated Oct. 26, 2012, Rapiscan Systems. |
International Search Report for PCT/US2010/057123, dated Mar. 22, 2011, Rapiscan Systems. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20200158860 A1 | May 2020 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62702841 | Jul 2018 | US | |
62702868 | Jul 2018 | US | |
62702833 | Jul 2018 | US | |
61949775 | Mar 2014 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 14639956 | Mar 2015 | US |
Child | 15859777 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 15859777 | Jan 2018 | US |
Child | 16520786 | US |