The present invention relates to a radar detector and a radar detecting method for WLAN systems and particularly concerns the radar detection for 802.11h dynamic frequency selection mechanism.
The wireless 802.11h communication standard, which is an extension of the 802.11a standard, is designed to meet European regulations regarding the use of the 5 GHz band by ensuring that WLAN systems operating in this band do not interfere with military radars and other users of the frequency band. Two mitigation technologies are provided with that purpose in mind:
The previous radar detector implemented in WLAN systems was solely based on the detection (power-wise) of a single short pulse and is expected to yield a relatively high rate of false alarm when performance assessment occurs. This scheme, which comes within the framework of the AGC (automatic gain control) procedure, uses the power measurements provided by the RSSI block to make a decision about whether a short pulse has been received and is likely to trigger upon the reception of any type of pulse-like signal without discrimination (there actually exist radar-like short pulses or bursts, which may result from either external parasitic noise, packet collision from WLAN stations operating in the same channel or WLAN activity in adjacent channels).
The problem to be solved comes within the framework of DFS and is concerned with the successful detection of co-channel radar signals by an 802.11h station in order to prevent any disruptions of the radar station nominal functioning by means of a subsequent channel change.
The radar detection scheme has to be highly reliable, as any false alarm would result in an 802.11h receiver station non-occupying the radar-flagged channel for 30 minutes.
What types of signals should we be able to detect? The military is actually all but generous when it comes to informing the rest of the community about the features of the fancy signals emitted by their radar stations. However, despite the secrecy surrounding military radars, it is generally admitted that radar signals broadly fall into either one of the two following categories:
The ETSI, which has initiated a regulation effort regarding these matters, wrote a document describing certain characteristics of the radar signals encountered in Europe, which actually emphasizes the first category described above. So, as far as we are concerned and as a starting point, we have taken for granted the information provided by the ETSI material we could lay our hands on and have therefore decided to restrict ourselves to the detection of pulse waveforms only. These radar pulses are assumed to:
It is the objective of the present invention to provide a radar detector and a radar detecting method for WLAN systems according to 802.11 wireless communication standards which considerably reduces the rate of error detections without degrading the detection rate.
This object is achieved by providing a radar detector and a radar detecting method as described in the independent claims.
Other features which are considered to be characteristic for the invention are set forth in the dependent claims.
In terms of objectives, we seek to achieve the following things:
Compared to the prior art solutions the new solution goes one step further as it processes any received pulse in order to determine the nature of the received signal and decide whether it would make it a radar signal according to our standards. This new scheme still takes root in the AGC procedure but now requires that both ADCs be switched on while radar search mode is activated. From a theoretical standpoint, the essence of the innovation consists in projecting the received phase vector on the signal subspace orthogonal to the expected radar pulse subspace and taking the norm of the resulting vector. The closer the norm is to zero, the more likely the received signal is to be a radar pulse.
However, from a practical standpoint, it is easier to calculate a scalar product between the received phase vector and a fitted model of it.
Two schemes are available depending on the nature of the received radar pulse:
a. Sinusoidal Pulse Detector:
The sinusoidal radar detector of
The radar detector according to the present invention considerably improves the false alarm rate without degrading the detection rate.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
10 2004 026 943 | Jun 2004 | DE | national |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
6831589 | Shearer, III | Dec 2004 | B2 |
7024188 | Khun-Jush et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
20030107512 | McFarland et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030206130 | Husted et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030214430 | Husted et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040033789 | Tsien | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040064493 | Kulkami et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040132411 | Li | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040151137 | McFarland et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040156336 | McFarland et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040157580 | Stadelmeier et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20050059363 | Hansen | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050059364 | Hansen et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
203 19 526 | May 2004 | DE |
20319526 | May 2004 | DE |
1 515 488 | Mar 2005 | EP |
2001285301 | Oct 2001 | JP |
2001285301 | Oct 2004 | JP |
03001742 | Jan 2003 | WO |
03026218 | Mar 2003 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20050270218 A1 | Dec 2005 | US |