Field of the Invention
Efficient dynamo-based production of electrical power in environmental energy harvesting and other applications in which the dynamo rotor is driven at low and variable revolutions per minute. Specific applications include, by way of example, powering systems aboard unmanned maritime platforms and harvesting wind power generation.
Description of the Related Art
Extraction of useful energy from locally available environmental sources is becoming vitally important to a wide range of applications, and immediately so for remote sensing and communications devices for military and civilian uses. A common element in all devices that harvest environmental energy from kinetic sources such as moving wind or water is the electrical dynamo, which must be capable of operating without an external source of current and therefore typically utilizes permanent magnets. Numerous electrical dynamo designs exist and are patented. In particular, these designs include vertical and horizontal axis wind turbines and kinetic power pendulum-type devices which respond to X-Y forces (with respect to the pendulum's rotational axis).
One of the problems associated with high-efficiency, radial flux, permanent magnet alternators is cost of fabrication when the rotor size exceeds 5 or 6 inches. The cost of rare earth magnets dominates the cost equation today, so any reduction in the cost of other components presents opportunities to reduce overall cost.
Accordingly, there is a perpetual need in the alternator (dynamo) art for improved technical designs which balance intended application, size, costs and other factors to meet efficiency demands.
In a first exemplary embodiment, an energy conversion system includes: a cylindrical rotor including a mass and multiple magnets affixed on an outer face thereof; a cylindrical stator including one or more dielectric components wound with copper wire in a predetermined configuration, the cylindrical rotor being placed within the cylindrical stator; a shell component rotatably connected with the cylindrical rotor, wherein the cylindrical rotor and the cylindrical stator are located within a circumference of the shell component; and a rotatable shaft for simultaneously rotating the cylindrical rotor and the shell component, the rotatable shaft being placed in the center of the cylindrical rotor.
In a second exemplary embodiment, an energy conversion system includes: a cylindrical rotor including a mass and a round plate with multiple magnets affixed on the periphery thereof by individual L-brackets each of which has a short section and a long section, the individual L-brackets being secured to the plate by threading a short section thereof through individual openings along the periphery and securing one of the multiple magnets to the long section of each L-bracket; a cylindrical stator including one or more dielectric components wound with copper wire in a predetermined configuration, the cylindrical rotor being placed within the cylindrical stator; and a rotatable shaft for rotating the cylindrical rotor, the rotatable shaft being placed in the center of the cylindrical rotor.
In a third exemplary embodiment, an energy conversion system includes: a cylindrical rotor including a mass and a round plate with multiple magnets affixed on the periphery thereof by individual L-brackets each of which has a short section and a long section, the individual L-brackets being secured to the plate by threading a short section thereof through individual openings along the periphery and securing one of the multiple magnets to the long section of each L-bracket; a cylindrical stator including multiple dielectric components each having a length and width and having notches at a top and bottom of the length thereof, wherein each of the multiple dielectric components includes a piece of copper wire wound around the length of the component through the top and bottom notches, the cylindrical rotor being placed within the cylindrical stator; a shell component rotatably connected with the cylindrical rotor, wherein the cylindrical rotor and the cylindrical stator are located within a circumference of the shell component; and a rotatable shaft for simultaneously rotating the cylindrical rotor and the shell, the rotatable shaft being placed in the center of the cylindrical rotor.
The following figures are intended to be illustrative of the exemplary embodiments of the present invention and are to be considered in conjunction with the descriptions provided herein.
An exemplary energy conversion system 10 in a radial flux configuration is shown in
Referring to
With the design illustrated in
Referring to
The alternative rotor and stator designs may be used together to form an alternator or individually with other stator and rotor variations, such as those described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/778,586 entitled RADIAL FLUX PERMANENT MAGNET ALTERNATOR WITH DIELECTRIC STATOR BLOCK which is incorporate herein by reference. The alternative designs reduce costs because there are no complicated shapes, no time-consuming machining, and no exotic materials required to build the alternator. Assembly time is minimal and individual components, e.g., magnets/brackets and/or stator blocks, can be replaced in the field if required. Similar to
Referring to
In operation, the shell effectively shields the magnetic flux of the permanent magnets outside the alternator to a level that is near background noise. This is important for a number of reasons. Many electronics are sensitive to strong magnetic fields and can be damaged, malfunction, or have skewed readings of sensors. As a result, the shell rotor allows more tightly packed integrated systems in which the buffer between the alternator and any sensitive electronics can effectively be eliminated. Further the distance in which the alternator and its housing must be constructed of dielectric/non-conductive materials is reduced. This simplifies design and reduces cost. For example, without the shell, magnetic flux ½ an inch from the surface can be as high as 1000 gauss. With the shell, at the shell surface it is in the range of 10-15 gauss.
The energy conversion systems described herein are based on the use of permanent magnets in what is known as a radial flux configuration. The configuration is brushless and results in much greater swept coil area in the same footprint as an axial-flux design and is well suited to low rotational speed applications as low as approximately 1 rpm. In a particular embodiment, various exemplary materials and configurations include neodymium magnets, steel rotor and shaft with an unbalanced mass. One skilled in the art recognizes that the number and spacing of magnets is changeable in accordance with optimization parameters. Similarly, rotor material and configuration, e.g., hollow, solid, unbalanced, can also be manipulated in accordance with end use requirements. These variations fall within the scope of the invention. The stators are preferably air-core with copper wiring and dielectric materials such as fiberglass. The use of dielectric material reduces or eliminates eddy current drag forces, which otherwise oppose rotation of the rotor even when the stator coil circuit is open (no load). Examples of dielectric materials that are suitable include non-carbon composites such as fiberglass/eGlass, phenolic resins, plastics, polycarbonate, wood, 3-D printed plastics (such as glass-reinforced nylon), and glass.
As suggested herein, there are various combinations of rotors (15, 15′), stators (30, 30′) and stator shell 100 configurations and material substitutions that may be implemented in accordance with size, power requirements, weight restrictions, material costs. For example, a smaller footprint alternator using the shell and smaller (less expensive) magnets could produce the same power output as a larger footprint alternator with no shell. One skilled in the art recognizes the trade-offs and advantages resulting from the configurations described herein.
The exemplary configurations described above result from the identification and neutralization of detracting forces previously overlooked and insignificant in the generator field. Specifically, for harvesting at low rotational speeds to produce relatively low power, e.g., on the order of watts, the configurations described herein minimize sources of non-mechanical rotational resistance caused by, for example, the buildup of eddy currents and cogging forces in ferrous or conductive elements in motion-relative components of a permanent magnet alternator. In theory, the spin-down time for a dynamo should be governed by the friction in its bearings and with the air. A low-friction device should have a relatively long spin-down time. However, it can be readily shown that typical generators have very short spin-down times, even when no electrical load is applied. Laboratory experiments and application of theory (Lenz, Maxwell, and Faraday), led researchers to the conclusion that these excess forces are the result of eddy current drag, which is overlooked when a powerful prime mover such as an internal combustion engine is used. In fact, this eddy current drag is a significant source of “friction” and is released in the form of heat in the generator. Utilizing the configurations described herein, the spin down time can be increased from several seconds to several minutes as a direct result of the application of these principles in the form of dielectric construction materials. This approach is distinctive from prior art configurations, even those identified as having a “substantially ironless” stator, as some steel is used to help direct the magnetic fields—resulting in some cogging. The exemplary embodiments described herein eliminate the presence of iron, conductive, or otherwise magnetically interactive materials from the vicinity of the stator or alternator housing.
To that end, the configurations are constructed to utilize dielectric structural materials to prevent counter-electromagnetic field (EMF) or eddy currents in certain structural components. This includes the materials use for the stator block, top and bottom plates, and structural elements such as legs, and outer housing. The exemplary configurations are able to produce useful voltages at very low rotational speeds, eliminating the requirements for step-up gearing from low-speed, high-torque input (also known as break-out torque), which is frequently encountered with various “renewable” energy harvesting technologies, including: wind turbines, both horizontal and vertical (e.g., Savonius, Darrius); Riverine and tidal current turbines and drogues; and certain types wave energy conversion (WEC) devices.
Operation at very low rotational speeds offers the following advantages: enables direct 1:1 rotational speed with wind turbines and kinetic reaction mass devices (wave energy); reduces or eliminates the requirement for transmissions and gearboxes, which reduces costs and complexity and scheduled maintenance requirements while increasing reliability and mean time to failure, which is important in remote marine applications; reduces or eliminates the requirement for precision balancing of the rotor to manage vibration, with cost savings; reduces wear on bearings; relaxes structural considerations due to very high centrifugal forces of high-speed rotors; generates less mechanical friction heating; increases mechanical reliability; reduces eddy current reaction in the permanent magnets, reducing heating in the magnets and improving performance and lifetime.
The exemplary system described herein has unlimited applicability. While immediate applications for the technology include remote low power applications such as individual ocean buoys in the single digit watt power output range, the scalability of the technology would allow for power output up to an in excess of 100 kilowatts. Other potential uses include unmanned maritime platforms and remote cellular communications power stations. The exemplary embodiment described above generates output power in the range of approximately 2 to 20 watts. The energy conversion system is intended to be a plug-and-play generator where output wires can be connected directly to a power supply, e.g., such as the payload power supply on a buoy.
The embodiments set forth herein are intended to be exemplary of the described inventive concepts and are in no way intended to limit the scope of the invention thereto. One skilled in the art recognizes the numerous variations that are inherently contemplated by the invention as described.
The present application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 13/415,645, filed Mar. 8, 2012, titled “Radial Flux Alternator,” the subject matter of which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety. U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/778,586 entitled “Radial Flux Permanent Magnet Alternator With Dielectric Stator Block” is related to the subject matter described herein, subject to common ownership and incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1502511 | Marvin | Jul 1924 | A |
2277095 | Fleischmann | Mar 1942 | A |
2990803 | Henderson | Jul 1961 | A |
3001371 | Gilmore, Jr. et al. | Sep 1961 | A |
3070061 | Rightmyer | Dec 1962 | A |
3231749 | Hink, III | Jan 1966 | A |
3332229 | Klinck et al. | Jul 1967 | A |
3654807 | Deskey | Apr 1972 | A |
3691573 | Laudato, Jr. | Sep 1972 | A |
3763703 | Man | Oct 1973 | A |
3783313 | Mathur | Jan 1974 | A |
3800128 | Kurk | Mar 1974 | A |
3814910 | Palmieri et al. | Jun 1974 | A |
3875388 | Luten et al. | Apr 1975 | A |
3881094 | Taylor et al. | Apr 1975 | A |
3881095 | Taylor et al. | Apr 1975 | A |
3968353 | Kuller | Jul 1976 | A |
4100441 | Landry | Jul 1978 | A |
4110630 | Hendel | Aug 1978 | A |
4168556 | Fink et al. | Sep 1979 | A |
4194634 | Kelly | Mar 1980 | A |
4266143 | Ng | May 1981 | A |
4317047 | de Almada | Feb 1982 | A |
4340821 | Slonim | Jul 1982 | A |
4340936 | Mounce | Jul 1982 | A |
4352023 | Sachs et al. | Sep 1982 | A |
4405866 | Masuda et al. | Sep 1983 | A |
4423334 | Jacobi et al. | Dec 1983 | A |
4438343 | Marken | Mar 1984 | A |
4490621 | Watabe et al. | Dec 1984 | A |
4527951 | Trier | Jul 1985 | A |
4531063 | Vielmo et al. | Jul 1985 | A |
4549267 | Drabouski, Jr. | Oct 1985 | A |
4594525 | Stokes | Jun 1986 | A |
4631921 | Linderfelt | Dec 1986 | A |
4674324 | Benoit | Jun 1987 | A |
4683393 | Stokes | Jul 1987 | A |
4708592 | Krolick et al. | Nov 1987 | A |
4748338 | Boyce | May 1988 | A |
4781023 | Gordon | Nov 1988 | A |
4785404 | Sims et al. | Nov 1988 | A |
4843250 | Stupakis | Jun 1989 | A |
4851704 | Rubi | Jul 1989 | A |
4872118 | Naidenov et al. | Oct 1989 | A |
4954110 | Warnan | Sep 1990 | A |
5048356 | Levko | Sep 1991 | A |
5077549 | Hershkovitz et al. | Dec 1991 | A |
5268881 | Damm | Dec 1993 | A |
5341757 | Digiacomo | Aug 1994 | A |
5411422 | Robertson | May 1995 | A |
5424582 | Trepl, II et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5452216 | Mounce | Sep 1995 | A |
5460099 | Matsuhisa et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5499889 | Yim | Mar 1996 | A |
5608160 | Chastonay | Mar 1997 | A |
5696413 | Woodbridge et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5770893 | Youlton | Jun 1998 | A |
5783893 | Dade et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5789826 | Kumbatovic | Aug 1998 | A |
5908122 | Robinett et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5924845 | Bagley et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5929531 | Lagno | Jul 1999 | A |
6020653 | Woodbridge et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6106411 | Edwards | Aug 2000 | A |
6216625 | Baluha | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6255654 | Verbinski et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6308649 | Gedeon | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6441516 | Kaelin et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6507025 | Verbinski et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6552346 | Verbinski et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6600161 | Desaute et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6616402 | Selsam | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6647716 | Boyd | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6681572 | Flory | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6823810 | Carlson et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6833631 | Van Breems | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6864614 | Murray | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6953937 | Reber et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6994047 | Pent, III | Feb 2006 | B1 |
7039159 | Muenchau et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7042110 | Mikhail et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7045787 | Verbinski et al. | May 2006 | B1 |
7105939 | Bednyak | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7143363 | Gaynor et al. | Nov 2006 | B1 |
7166844 | Gormley et al. | Jan 2007 | B1 |
7190101 | Hirzel | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7199481 | Hirsch | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7215738 | Muenchau et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7239038 | Zimmerman et al. | Jul 2007 | B1 |
7298054 | Hirsch | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7335887 | Verbinski et al. | Feb 2008 | B1 |
7352844 | Muenchau et al. | Apr 2008 | B1 |
7362004 | Becker | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7365332 | Verbinski et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7368717 | Verbinski et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7375436 | Goldin | May 2008 | B1 |
7388205 | Verbinski et al. | Jun 2008 | B1 |
7388209 | Gormley et al. | Jun 2008 | B1 |
7408160 | Verbinski et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7430479 | Holslin et al. | Sep 2008 | B1 |
7436082 | Ruse et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7440848 | Anderson | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7453165 | Hench | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7453987 | Richardson | Nov 2008 | B1 |
7538445 | Kornbluh et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
7557456 | Kornbluh et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7596275 | Richardson et al. | Sep 2009 | B1 |
7625255 | Ide et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7629704 | Hench | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7649276 | Kornbluh et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7742568 | Smith | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7957506 | Smith | Jun 2011 | B2 |
8116431 | Smith | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8314528 | Shinohara | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8598536 | Jarron et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8618495 | De Geronimo | Dec 2013 | B2 |
20010000197 | Gorlov | Apr 2001 | A1 |
20020047427 | Shiga et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20030122084 | Desaute et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030173922 | Pelonis | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030214196 | Cai et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040021391 | Jones | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040046474 | Kalsi | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040084980 | Yamaguchi et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040239199 | Qu et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050285407 | Davis et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060279153 | Barreiro | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070137195 | Tayla et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070138793 | Zimmerman et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070251230 | Zimmerman et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070278876 | Haga et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080024030 | Saboi et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080054639 | Maier et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080093858 | Hench | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080224472 | Bean | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080265582 | Hench | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20090008942 | Clement et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090127856 | Hench | May 2009 | A1 |
20090160191 | Beane | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20100072752 | Park et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100123315 | Anderson, Jr. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100148512 | Pitre | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100181491 | Karim et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20110012358 | Brewster et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110115326 | Clark et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110278847 | Hench et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20130057323 | Spini et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
Entry |
---|
U.S. Appl. No. 11/033,552, filed Jan. 12, 2005, Vourvopoulos, et al. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion issued for PCT/US2009/031675, dated Mar. 30, 2009, 8 pp. |
Timmons, Heather, “Energy From the Restless Sea,” The New York Times, Aug. 3, 2006, New York, New York. |
“noah li-leger” [online], The Creative World at Work, Copyright 2010 [retrieved on Apr. 16, 2010], 1 p., Retrieved from the Internet: http://www.coroflot.com/public/individual—profile.asp?individual—id=140221&sort—by=1&. |
“UBC Entrepreneurs Harness Wave Energy” [online], UBC This Week, Mar. 9, 2006 [retrieved on Apr. 16, 2010], 4 pp., Retrieved from the Internet: http://www.publicaffairs.ubc.ca/ubcthisweek/2006/06mar09.html. |
“Wavelength—Wavelength Power Solutions” [online], The Creative World at Work, Copyright 2010 [retrieved on Apr. 16, 2010], 4 pp., Retrieved from the Internet: http://www.coroflot.com/public/individual —file.asp?individual—id=140221&portfolio—id=342501&sort—by=1&. |
Khan, Jahangir and Bhuyan, Gouri S., “Ocean Energy: Global Technology Development Status,” A report prepared by Powertech Labs Inc. for the IEA-OES under Annex I—Review, Exchange and Dissemination of Information on Ocean Energy Systems, IEA-OES Document No. T0104, 83 pp., Mar. 2009. |
Brekken, T.K.A., von Jouanne, A. Hai Yue Han, “Ocean Wave Energy Overview and Research at Oregon State University,” School of Electr. Eng. & Comp. Sci., Oregon State University, Corvallis OR, Power Electronics and Machines in Wind Applications, PEMWA 2009, IEEE, Jun. 24-26, 2009. |
“Wind Turbine Power Calculations, RWE npower renewables” [online], Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Power Industry, The Royal Academy of Engineering, [retrieved on Feb. 24, 2011], 5 pp., Retrieved from the Internet: http://www.raeng.org.uk/education/diploma/maths/pdf/exemplars—advanced/23—Wind—Turbine.pdf. |
“Producing Renewable Electricity with a Hybrid, Bluenergy Solarwind Turbine,” 2 pp., Copyright 2009-2011, www.blueenergyusa.com. |
“Development of the Helical Reaction Hydraulic Turbine,” Final Technical Report, Project Period: Jul. 1, 1996-Jun. 30, 1998, Submission to: The US Department of Energy, Prepared by: Dr. Alexander Gorlov, PI, MIME Department, Northeastern University, 59 pp., Aug. 1998. |
Rasila, Mika, “Torque and Speed Control of a Pitch Regulated Wind Turbine,” Department of Electric Power Engineering, Chalmers University of Technology, Goteborg, Sweden, 67 pp., 2003. |
International Search report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US2011/027635, dated May 25, 2011, 9 pp. |
Specification and Drawings for U.S. Appl. No. 12/778,586, filed May 12, 2010, 20 pp. |
Alves, Marco, et al., “Hydrodynamic Optimization of a Wave Energy Converter Using a Heave Motion Buoy,” Proceedings of the 69th Int. Conf. on Wave and Tidal Energy, Porto, Portugal, 2007. |
“Pelamis Wave Energy Converter” [online], [retrieved on Apr. 23, 2012], 4 pp., Retrieved from the Internet: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pelamis—Wave—Energy—Converter. |
Evans, Paul, “Ocean-Power Installation Up and Running,” gizmag, Mar. 2, 2009 [retrieved on Apr. 23, 2012], 5 pp., Retrieved from the Internet: http://www.gizmag.com/wave-power-owe/11122/. |
Von Jouanne, A., Brekken, T.K.A., “Creating Energy From Ocean Waves” [online], Wallace Energy Systems & Renewables Facility, Oregon State University, Copyright 2012 [retrieved on Apr. 23, 2012], 2 pp., Retrieved from the Internet: http://eecs.engr.oregonstate.edu/wesrf. |
World Energy Council, “2007 Survey of Energy Resources,” Ocean Thermal Energy Conversion, 9 pp. |
Kane, M., “California Small Hydropower and Ocean Wave Energy Resources,” in Support of the 2005 Integrated Energy Policy Report, Presented at: California Energy Commission, Sacramento, California, 29 pp., May 9, 2005. |
Previsic, Mirko, et al., “E21 EPRI Assessment, Offshore Wave Energy Conversion Devices,” Electricity Innovation Institute, 52 pp., Jun. 16, 2004. |
Bedard, Roger, “Feasibility of Using Wavewatch III for Days-Ahead Output Forecasting for Grid Connected Wave Energy Projects in Washington and Oregon, Stage Gate #2 Final Report, EPRI-WP012,” Electric Power Research Institute, 78 pp., Feb. 29, 2008. |
Bedard, Roger, et al., “North American Ocean Energy Status—Mar. 2007,” 8 pp. |
Rondorf, Neil, “A Virginia-Based Marine Renewable Energy Technologies,” Presentation to VRTAC, 19 pp., Sep. 19, 2006. |
Koola, Paul Mario, et al., “The Dynamics of Wave Carpet, a Novel Deep Water Wave Energy Design,” Oceans 2003 Proceedings, vol. 4, pp. 2288-2293, Sep. 22-26, 2003, San Diego, California. |
Kim, Jin-Ha, et al., “An Experimental Study on the Reverse Wave Drift Force of a BBDB Type OWC Wave Energy Device,” Proceedings of the Seventh (2006) ISOPE Pacific/Asia Offshore Mechanics Symposium, pp. 237-242, Dalian, China, Sep. 17-21, 2006. |
“Linear Control of Wave Energy Converters” [online], Lancaster University Renewable Energy Group—Wave Energy [retrieved on Jun. 12, 2012], 3 pp. Retrieved from the Internet: http://engineering.lancs.ac.uk/lureg/group—research/wave—energy—research—Linear—C . . . |
“Wooden Low-Rpm Alternator” [online], Copyright 2000 [retrieved on Mar. 29, 2012], 15 pp., Retrieved from the Internet: http://www.otherpower.com/pmg2.html. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20160254710 A1 | Sep 2016 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13415645 | Mar 2012 | US |
Child | 15138848 | US |