This application is a U.S. national stage filing under 35 U.S.C. § 371 of International Application No. PCT/EP2014/065817, filed on Jul. 23, 2014, incorporated by reference herein in its entirety, which claims the benefit of priority to European Patent Application No. 13182346.0, filed on Aug. 30, 2013.
The present invention relates to a radially collapsible frame for a prosthetic heart valve and a method for manufacturing such a frame. Specifically, the present invention relates to a radially collapsible frame for a prosthetic valve used in the treatment of a stenosis (narrowing) of a cardiac valve and/or a cardiac valve insufficiency. In addition, the present invention relates to an endoprosthesis comprising the inventive radially collapsible frame.
The expression “narrowing (stenosis) of a cardiac valve and/or cardiac valve insufficiency” is intended to include a functional defect of one or more cardiac valves which is either genetic or has developed. A cardiac defect of this type might affect each of the four heart valves, although the valves in the left ventricle (aortic and mitral valves) are affected much more often than the right sided part of the heart (pulmonary and tricuspid valves). The functional defect can result in narrowing (stenosis), inability to close (insufficiency) or a combination of the two (combined vitium).
Radially collapsible frames for prosthetic heart valves are known in the state of the art. In particular, minimally-invasive forms of treatment of cardiac valves have been developed recently which are characterized by allowing the procedure to be performed under local anesthesia. One approach provides for the use of a catheter system to implant a self-expandable frame, which is connected to a collapsible valvular prosthesis. Such a self-expandable endoprosthesis can be guided via a catheter system to the implantation site within the heart through an inguinal artery or vein. After reaching the implantation site, the radially collapsible frame can be unfolded so as to anchor the endoprosthesis in the vicinity of a native valve annulus.
To this end, it is known that the radially collapsible frame may be comprised of, for example, a plurality of self-expanding substantially longitudinal arches, the arches being configured to hold a valvular prosthesis in place at the desired implantation site. The prior art document EP 1 980 220 A1, for instance, discloses a self-expandable stent having three retaining arms (20) which form the base for an anchoring segment for accommodating a valvular prosthesis (40). In order to automatically position and orientate the common frame described by the EP 1 980 220 A1, a total of three positioning arches (10) are provided. The positioning arches (10) have a rounded head portion (12) which engages the pockets of an insufficient heart valve, which shall be replaced by the known endoprosthesis. These three positioning arches (10) ensure that the requisite positioning accuracy can be obtained in the direction of rotation and provide for additional radial clamping forces in order to support the implantation of the stent at the desired implantation side.
Additionally, when the known frame (1) is in its expanded state, the respective positioning arms of the positioning arches (10) are located in the pockets of the diseased heart valve and thus essentially guarantee secure and error-free positioning of the medical device. The pocket flaps of the diseased heart valve are then clamped between the positioning arches (10) and the retaining arches (20), in a manner similar to a paper-clip, due to the expansion of the endoprosthesis 1. This further assists in achieving an optimum positioning and anchoring of the known heart valve frame.
As a consequence of the clamping effect between the positioning arches (10) and the retaining arches (20), the radially collapsible frames known from the prior art tend to allow for a frictional contact between the valvular prosthesis and the diseased native heart valves, as the valvular prosthesis is frequently directly connected to the retaining arches of the collapsible frame. Such a frictional contact between the diseased heart valve and the valvular prosthesis can result in increased wear of the valvular prosthesis, due to undesired friction with the diseased heart valve. Furthermore, due to the common frame configuration, the diseased heart valve may impede the motion of the valvular prosthesis, especially during the opening movement of the prosthetic valve leaflet. In some circumstances, this may mean that the prosthetic heart valve leaflets may not be able to open fully, as a consequence of the presence of the diseased heart valve leaflets. Moreover, the common stent structures often fail to provide for sufficient radial forces in order to anchor the stent structure at the desired implantation side. As a consequence, inadvertent relocation of the stent after implantation may occur.
On the basis of the problems outlined above, certain embodiments of the present invention address the issue of providing a radially collapsible frame for a prosthetic valve, which guarantees perfect positioning of the heart valve prosthesis and, at the same time, protects the prosthetic valvular leaflets effectively from external stresses due to a frictional contact with the native heart valve leaflets. In addition, the inventive frame should provide for a treatment of the narrowed cardiac valve or cardiac valve insufficiency by way of a simple and reliable procedure to enable a routine treatment without major stress to the patient.
In this regard, and as it will be described in more detail below, the invention provides a radially collapsible frame for a prosthetic heart valve comprising an outflow region at a proximal end of the frame and an inflow end region at a distal end of the frame, opposite to the outflow end region. The radially collapsible frame further includes at least two radially spaced commissure attachment regions located at the outflow end of the frame and being configured to receive commissures of the prosthetic valve leaflets. A cell structure composed of a plurality of lattice cells is being arranged radially around a flow axis of the frame and connects the at least two commissure attachment regions. Finally, the radially collapsible frame further comprises at least one anchoring/positioning arch, wherein said at least one anchoring/positioning arch radially overlaps the cell structure, at least partially.
In medical terms, the commissure of a heart valve is a point or line of union or junction between the respective leaflets of a heart valve. In the closed state of a heart valve, the commissures can be described as the points or lines of a leaflet, contacting another leaflet in order to close the particular blood vessel. Naturally, the leaflets of a heart valve are continuously in contact with each other at two or more commissure edges which are radially distributed about the flow axis of a prosthetic heart valve. In this connection, the expression “commissure attachment region” describes an arrangement of struts located at the outflow end of the inventive stent, which is configured to receive the at least two commissure edges of the leaflets. Normally, the number of commissure attachment regions complies with the number of commissure edges formed by the leaflets.
Furthermore, the term “radially overlapping” expresses that the at least one anchoring/positioning arch is located along the same section of the frames flow axis as the cell structure. The anchoring/or positioning arch is, however, not part of the cell structure but radially distanced therefrom. In particular, the at least one anchoring/positioning arch may extend radially outwardly from the circumference of the cell structure, and hence, overlap the latter at least partly.
Accordingly, the inventive frame has the advantage that a cell structure, which is composed of a plurality of lattice cells, prevents any undesired contact between the native heart valve leaflets and the valvular prosthesis. In particular, the cell structure is disposed between the valvular prosthesis and the leaflets of the native valve. Therefore, the cell structure forms a separation wall in between and, additionally, provides for an improved clamping effect of the native heart valve leaflets together with the at least one anchoring/positioning arch. Moreover, the inventive collapsible frame does not necessarily have to provide for retaining arches, as it is conceivable to attach the valvular prosthesis directly to the plurality of lattice cells of the cell structure, by means of threads for example. Finally, it should be noted that the cell structure provides for an additional support of the inventive frame at the desired implantation side.
According to another embodiment of the present invention, the at least one anchoring/positioning arch of the collapsible frame may be rigidly attached to the at least two radially spaced commissure attachment regions. In particular, it is preferred to form the at least anchoring/positioning arch integrally with the at least two radially spaced commissure attachment regions as a single piece. In this way, the inventive radially collapsible frame is particularly robust and provides for a stable support of the valvular prosthesis within a patient's blood vessel. As it will be described in more detail below, all of the parts of the inventive frame may be cut out of a single hollow tube of shape memory material. Consequently, the radially overlapping at least one anchoring/positioning arch does not need to be fixed to the collapsible frame, by means of sutures, welding or adhesive, after the radially spaced commissure attachment regions and the cell structure have been cut out of the hollow metal tube. Instead, the at least one anchoring/positioning arch is cut out of the same hollow tube as the rest of the radially collapsible frame, wherein the at least one anchoring/positioning arch is formed proximally of the outflow end region of the frame and bend in a distal direction (towards the inflow end), so as to radially overlap the cell structure, after a laser cutting has been performed.
Of course, it is also feasible to apply other means of attaching the anchoring/positioning arch rigidly to the frame, such as welding, sewing, gluing or riveting for instance. According to this alternative, the at least one anchoring/positioning arch is formed as separate piece and attached to the frame structure subsequently, after the frame has been cut out of the hollow metal tube. In more detail, the at least one separate anchoring/positioning arch may be welded to the commissure attachment regions in such a way that the at least one anchoring/positioning arch radially overlaps the cell structure at least partially and extends in a direction towards the in flow end of the frame. As a consequence, it is not necessary to bend the at least one anchoring/position arch during a shape-setting process of the frame.
In accordance with another aspect of the present invention, the inventive frame further comprises a plurality of circumferentially arranged retaining arches, each including first and second arms joined to one another at a distal end of the retaining arches. The two arms of each respective retaining arch are joined by a rounded structure. The provision of circumferentially arranged retaining arches provides for various advantages effects. In particular, the retaining arches, which substantially range from the outflow end to the inflow end of the inventive frame, protrude radially in the expanded state of the frame to press against the wall of a patient's blood vessel in which the frame is deployed with a radially-acting contact force. The shape of the retaining arches may be configured to be positioned below the native valve annulus or to be positioned at least on the native valve annulus, thereby providing additional anchoring for the inventive stent together with a valvular prosthesis affixed thereto. As an alternative or in addition to the cell structure of the frame, the retaining arches may be used in order to attach the valvular prosthesis to the collapsible frame. In particular, a cusp edge of the valvular prosthesis may be sutured to the retaining arches, at an opposite and of the free commissure edges of the leaflets. In this connection, the first and second arms of each retaining arch may be shaped in such a way as to imitate the natural arcuate shape of the cusp edges of a native heart valve.
To this end, the two arms of each retaining arch are joined to one another at a connection, preferably having a substantially U- or V-shaped structure. As mentioned before, this particular shape of the retaining arches may particularly imitate the natural shape of a heart valve cusp region. The U- or V-shaped retaining arches may be located in such a way that the closed portion of the U- or V-shape forms the connection of the two arms in a distal direction, towards the inflow end of the frame. The open ends of the U- or V-shaped structure, on the contrary, may be attached to the at least two commissure attachment regions. Therefore, the retaining arches preferably have an open end directed towards the outflow end of the radially collapsible frame.
According to another embodiment, an entirety of three anchoring/positioning arches and an entirety of three retaining arches are provided at the inventive frame. Consequently, it is preferable to further provide for an entirety of three radially spaced commissure attachment regions, which are connected to the three anchoring/positioning arches and the three retaining arches respectively. In this regard, each first arm of the three anchoring/positioning arches or retaining arches respectively may be connected with a first commissure attachment region, whereas each second arm may be attached to a second neighboring commissure attachment region. In this way, each anchoring position arch and each retaining arch is connected with at least two of the radially spaced commissure attachments of the frame. The provision of three retaining arches is particularly useful when accommodating a valvular prosthesis having three flexible leaflets such as an aortic valve, for example. The same applies to the number of anchoring/positioning arches, which should comply with the number of leaflets of the valvular prosthesis so as to guarantee a suitable orientation of each leaflet at the desired implantation site.
As already indicated, the adjacent arms of two neighboring retaining arches preferably merge at one of the commissure attachment regions, near the outflow end region of the frame. Accordingly, each of the retaining arches is connected to a neighboring retaining arch at one of the commissure attachment regions, forming a circumferentially aligned attachment region for the cusp edges of the valvular prosthesis.
In another embodiment, the cell structure of the frame comprises a first cell region composed of a plurality of first cells, the first cells being arranged between the respective first and second arms of each retaining arch. Additionally, the cell structure may comprise a second cell region composed of a plurality of second cells, the second cells being arranged between adjacent arms of two neighboring retaining arches. In other words, the cell structure is preferably composed of at least two different cell types, which are arranged in an alternating manner radially around a flow axis of the frame. The first and second cell regions are intersected by the respective arms of the retaining arches. Preferably, the first and second cells of the first and second cell regions are constructed with a similar pattern and size. However, it is also conceivable to construct the first and second cells with differently. In particular, it may be desirable to implement a denser cell structure in the second cell region compared to the density of the cell structure in the first cell region. This is because the mainly second cell region provides for the stability of the inventive frame, whereas the first cell region is mainly provided in order to protect the valvular prosthesis from any direct contact with the native heart valves. Of course, however, the first cell region being arranged between the respective first and second arms of each retaining arch, also adds to the stability of the present frame.
In a particularly preferred embodiment, the at least one anchoring/positioning arch particularly radially overlaps the first cell region of the cell structure. In other words, the at least one anchoring/positioning arch is preferably arranged in between the respective first and second arms of each retaining arch, and thus, circumferentially aligned with the retaining arches.
According to another embodiment, each of the first cells or second cells is formed by a plurality of struts. Accordingly, each of the struts is either connected with one of the neighboring cells of the respective cell regions or with one of the arms of the retaining arches respectively. As already indicated above, each of the struts of the first and second cells is preferably formed by a laser cutting of a hollow shaped memory metal tube, providing for integrally connected first and second cells of the frame structure.
As already indicated above, each of the positioning arches and each of the retaining arches include a closed end directed towards the inflow end of the frame, wherein the closed end of a respective anchoring/positioning arch is substantially circumferentially aligned with respect to the closed end of an associated retaining arch. In other words, the positioning arches are configured symmetrically to the retaining arches although preferably disposed somewhat further towards the outflow region of the frame. Moreover, the upper end of the positioning arches may be connected to the upper ends of the associated retaining arches by means of the at least two radially space commissure attachment regions in the outflow region of the frame. In the expanded state of the frame, both, the commissure attachment region and the respective upper end of the positioning and retaining arches spread out so that a radially-acting force is exerted on a blood vessel wall, thereby enabling secure anchoring of the stent at the site of implantation. The circumferentially aligned lower end of the anchoring/positioning arch, on the other hand, spreads out even further than the retaining arches and the cell structure, so as to be able to engage the pockets of the native heart valve, thereby clamping the native heart valve leaflets between the lower of the anchoring/position arch and the lower end of the respective retaining arch.
In another embodiment, the present radially collapsible frame comprises at least one fastening portion by means of which a valvular prosthesis is connected to the frame. The at least one fastening portion preferably extends along the longitudinal axis of the frame and comprises a plurality of fastening holes distributed in a longitudinal direction at a discrete position along the length of the at least one fastening portion. A thread of thin wire may be guided through each fastening hole to secure the valvular prosthesis to the stent. The advantage of this feature is that longitudinal displacement of the valvular relative to the frame is a substantially minimized once implanted and so the prosthesis is not unduly disturbed or weakened as a result of the hearts peristaltic motion.
In addition to fastening holes, the fastening portion may include one or more notches to assist the seating and retaining of suture material. The notches also assist with an even attachment of the prosthesis to the frame and similarly to the fastening holes, minimizing longitudinal displacement of the prosthesis. The fastening portions are preferably formed as an integral part of the retaining arches. Nevertheless, it is also conceivable to implement fastening portions along any of the remaining structures of the inventive frame, such as the commissure attachment regions.
According to another embodiment, the retaining arches have a shape that matches the leaflets of a prosthetic valve attached to the frame, in the expanding state of the frame. This specific design of the respective arms of the retaining arches is unique for catheter delivered valves as it provides for heart valve durability advantages. The so formed arms of the retaining arches for supporting the cusp edge of the leaflets of the valvular prosthesis are attached to the frame across a gap behind the positioning arches and the cell structure respectively.
In order to further increase the support of the frame at the implantation site, the inventive frame may comprise at least one annular collar which is connected to a part of the rounded structure at a distal end section of the respective arms of the retaining arches. That is, the lower end section of each arm of the retaining arches may merge into an annular collar, which provides an additional anchoring measure for the frame. Furthermore, the annular collar may also be connected to the lower end of the second cell region. The annular collar may exhibit a plurality of supporting webs which run parallel to the longitudinal axis of the fame in its collapsed state and are inter-connected by transversal webs. In the expanded state of the frame, however, the supporting webs and the transversal webs of the annular collar may form a rhomboid or serpentine-like annular collar which abuts against the vascular wall of the patient. Therefore, the annular collar serves a supporting body through which the radial forces developing due to the self-expansion are transmitted to the vascular wall. Since a relatively large contact area of the frame interacts with the vascular wall, because of the structure of the annular collar, there may be a decreased risk of injury to artery or the tissue despite the increased radial forces. Moreover, the annular collar may be used to attach a skirt portion of the valvular prosthesis to the inventive frame. In this way, the risk for paravalvular leakage can be substantially reduced.
Each of the supporting webs of the annular collar may further provide for an eyelet as an additional fastening means. In this regard, the eyelets are uniformly distributed around the inflow end section of the frame, thereby providing a more uniform fixation of a valvular prosthesis to the frame. Hence, the risk of an actual displacement of the valvular prosthesis relative to the frame may be reduced.
According to another aspect of the present invention, the lower end section of the annular collar constitute at least one flared or tapered section, in the expanded state of the frame, thereby providing for an improved fixation for the frame in the position of the native cardiac valve and for preventing antegrade migration of the frame having a valvular prosthesis affixed thereto.
Preferably, the annular collar has a flared or tapered section with a radial shape. However, it is also conceivable that the flared or tapered section is not uniform along the circumference of the frame. For example, the annular collar may have a flare only near the location of the positioning arches, wherein no flares are provided near the commissure attachment regions, i.e. the regions in between the two arms of two neighboring position arches.
According to a most advantages embodiment, the annular collar may comprise a flared and a tapered section at the same time. In particular, the upper end of the annular collar, which is connected to the lower end of the retaining arches and to the lower end of the second cell region respectively, may be flared, whereas the lower end of the annular collar, which is located at the inflow end of the frame, may be tapered. In simple terms, the annular collar may have a substantially pear-shaped configuration, which effectively prevents damage to the patient's heart vessel caused by contact with the annular collar. If the present frame is used in order to support the implantation of a prosthetic aortic heart valve, for example, this specific configuration of the annular collar is particularly advantageous. This is because the pear-shaped annular collar prevents the frame from irritating the heart conduction system by stimulating the bundle of his which is located below the natural heart valve annulus, i.e. at the position where the annular collar is supposed to be arranged. By forming the annular collar in a pear-shape, it is possible to exclusively contact the lower region of the native heart valve annulus so as to support the inventive frame at the implantation site. Any region further into the heart chamber, on the other hand, is not affected by the annular collar, as the lower end section is tapered and hence does not contact the walls of the heart chamber at whole.
In another embodiment, the inventive frame has a scalloped inflow edge designed at its distal end when the frame is in its expanded state. Hence, the inflow edge of the frame does not lie entirely in the plane perpendicular to the longitudinal direction of the frame. Rather, the edge of the frame at its inflow end region may have a scalloped shape. In addition, the scalloped inflow edge may also be flared or tapered around its circumference or only at the selected location. For example, one embodiment may include a flare at the inflow edge only near the location of the positioning arches and transition to a none-flared straight cylindrical shape in the area between two neighboring positioning arches. In particular, the location of the respective flares and the respective straight cylindrical shape may be determined by the location of the arms of the respective retaining arches to which the tissue component (s) of the valvular prosthesis is attached. The scalloped shape generally follows the native valve annulus and does not compromise the ability of the valve to seal against leakage.
As will be described in more detail below, when manufacturing the inventive frame, it is conceivable for the frame to exhibit a structure integrally cut from a portion of a hollow tube, in particular from a small metal tube, which incorporates all of the structures of the frame at the same time. Specifically, it is conceivable to use a laser beam to cut the stent structure from the small metal tube.
The small metal tube is most preferably a shape memory material such that the frame exhibits an integrally-formed structure which can transform from a first pre-definable shape into a second pre-definable shape. Therefore, the frame exhibits a first pre-definable shape (collapsed shape) during insertion into the patient's body and a second pre-definable shape (expanded shape) once it is implanted. Because of the frames design, during the transition of the frame from the first pre-definable shape into the second pre-definable shape, the positioning arches and the cell structure radially expand as a function of the cross-sectional expansion of the frame. The frames second shape is preferably selected such that when the frame is expanded, the cell structure abuts against the wall of the blood vessel in which the frame is deployed. In addition, the lower ends of the cell structure which are positioned beneath the native valve annulus, provide additional anchoring of the stent.
When the frame consists of shaped memory material, the material is preferably being designed such that the frame can transform from a temporary shape into a permanent shape under the influence of an external stimulus. In this regard, the temporary shape is the frames first shape (i.e. the collapsed state of the frame) while the permanent shape is assumed in the frames second shape (i.e. in the second state of the frame). In particular, the use of a shape memory material such as Nitinol, i.e. an equiatomic alloy of nickel and titanium, allows for a particularly gentle implantation procedure when implanting the frame. When manufacturing the frame from a shape memory material, the frame structure is preferably shaped after it has been cut into a stent pattern from a hollow tube. As will be described in more detail below, once the desired shape has been formed by bending the structures of the frame, this shape is “fixed”. This process is known as “programming”. Programming may be affected by heating the frame structure, forming the frame into the desired shape and then cooling the frame. Programming may also be affected by forming and shaping the frame structure at low temperatures, this being known as “cold stretching”. The permanent shape is thus saved, enabling the frame to be stored and implanted in a temporary, non-formed shape. If an external stimulus then acts on the stents structure, the shape memory effect is activated and the saved permanent shape is restored.
A particularly preferred embodiment provides for the external stimulus to be a definable switching temperature. It is thus conceivable that the stent material needs to be heated to a higher temperature than the switching temperature in order to activate the shape memory effect and thus regenerate the saved permanent shape of the stent. A specific switching temperature can be preset by the relevant selection of the chemical composition of the shape memory material and the heating time during programming.
It is particularly preferred to set the switching temperature to be in the range of between room temperature and the patient's body temperature. Doing so is of advantage, especially with regard to the medical device being used as an implant in a patient's body. Accordingly, all that needs to be ensured when implanting the frame is that the frame is warmed up to the patient's body temperature (37° C.) at the site of implementation so as to activate the shape memory effect of the frame material.
By means of the inventive frame, a diseased native heart valve may be treated. In this connection a prosthetic valve (valvular prosthesis) is supported on the inventive radially collapsible frame. Thereafter, the at least one anchoring/positioning arch is positioned within a pocket of the native heart valve. Subsequently, at least a portion of the native heart valve is positioned between the at least one anchoring/positioning arch and the plurality of cells of the cell structure. Finally, a radial force is applied against a portion of the vascular wall, by means of the commissure attachment region and the cell structure, for example, so as to fix the frame and the prosthetic valve to the desired implantation site.
As already indicated before, the present invention further relates to an endoprosthesis comprising the inventive radially collapsible frame. The endoprosthesis further includes a valvular prosthesis which is attached to an inner surface of the frame, preferably by means of sutures. The endoprosthesis may be used to treat any deficient heart valve, most preferably a deficient aortic heart valve. Due to the inventive structure of the radially collapsible frame, the endoprosthesis can be fixed securely to the native heart valve annulus and exhibits a particularly high wear resistance.
For the majority of patients undergoing treatment, it is preferable for the endoprosthesis to have an outer diameter of approximately 7.0 mm to approximately 5.0 mm in its first shape so that the valvular prosthesis can be introduced with a 23F delivery system (given an external diameter of 7.0 mm) or with a 17F delivery system (given an external diameter of 5.0 mm).
Due to the new frame design, the inventive endoprosthesis can achieve an outer diameter between approximately 4.0 mm to approximately 8.0 mm in its first shape. Accordingly, the new endoprosthesis may be introduced with a 20F delivery system, preferably an 18F delivery system, more preferably a 16F delivery system and most preferably a 14F delivery system. Therefore, the endoprosthesis according to the present invention can be introduced into a patient's blood vessel easier and causes less damage.
After the endoprosthesis has been released from the catheter tip, in the implanted state respectively, the endoprosthesis exhibits a second predefined shape in which the stent and the valve assembly affixed thereto is in an expanded state (expanded condition). Depending on the patient being treated, it is preferable for the frame to exhibit a diameter of between 19.0 mm and 27.0 mm in its second shape and implanted state.
The present invention further relates to a method for manufacturing a radially collapsible frame according to the present invention. In particular, the inventive method comprises a step for providing a hollow tube made of shaped memory material, followed by a step for scanning a beam of laser radiation over a desired region of the hollow tube, such that a desired pattern is cut into the tube, thereby cutting a stent pattern. In particular, the laser scanning step is configured in such a way that the stent pattern comprises a basic frame cell structure defining a mash, composed of a plurality of cells, each cell being formed by a plurality of struts, and at least one anchoring/positioning arch extending away from the plurality of cells of the cell structure. In other words, by scanning the hollow tube with a beam of laser radiation, a stent pattern is cut out comprising a cell structure and at least one anchoring/positioning arch located above the latter cell structure.
Subsequently, in a shape setting process, the final structure of the radially collapsible frame is defined by bending the at least one anchoring/positioning arch into the direction of the cell structure in such a way that the at least one anchoring/positioning arch extends in substantially the same direction as the plurality of cells of the cell structure. Accordingly, the so bent at least one anchoring/positioning arch radially overlaps the plurality of cells of the cells structure at least partially. As a consequence, the at least one anchoring/positioning arch is radially distanced from the cell structure of the frame. That is, the at least one anchoring/positioning arch is positioned in a radial distance from a flow axis of the frame, which is further than the cell structure.
In order to prevent the beam of laser radiation from cutting two opposite ends of the hollow tube made of shaped memory material at the same time, the step for scanning the metal tube with a beam of laser radiation may include a step for placing the hollow tube on a mandrel. Thus, after cutting one surface of the hollow tube, the beam of laser radiation hits the surface of the mandrel and hence does not affect another opposite part of the hollow tube. In this connection, it should be noted that the cut out stent pattern is removed from the mandrel before the aforementioned shape-setting process of the inventive method is performed.
According to another embodiment of the present method, the shape setting process may apply a heat treatment process to the stent pattern. In more detail, the heat treatment process can be used in order to set the permanent shape of the frame to a shape with an at least partly radially overlapping anchoring/positioning arch. Of course, the permanent shape is configured to be the expanded shape of the inventive collapsible frame. That is, in the temporary shape the frame is flexible and hence can be collapsed in order to be introduced by an insertion device.
The following will make reference to the included drawings and describe preferred embodiments of the frame according to the present invention in greater detail.
Shown are:
The first embodiment of the inventive radially collapsible frame 1 depicted in
As can further be seen from
At the proximal end of the commissure attachment regions 10, 10′, 10″, retaining portions 11, 11′, 11″ are provided. The retaining portions 11, 11′, 11″ may comprise eyelets (not shown) which can be used in order to temporarily attach the inventive frame to a medical insertion device. Alternatively, the retaining portions could be received by grooves of a retaining element attached to the insertion device. The retaining portions 11, 11′, 11″ may comprise the depicted round shape. However, it is also conceivable to form the retaining portions 11, 11′, 11″ in any other shape, such as rectangular or polygonal shapes.
The radially spaced commissure attachment regions 10, 10′, 10″ are connected with each other by means of a cell structure 30 composed of a plurality of lattice cells 31, 31′, 31″, 32, 32′, 32″ which are arranged radially around a flow axis (not shown) of the frame 1. The flow axis of the inventive frame is basically defined by the longitudinal axis of the frame, around which all of the depicted frame structures are disposed circumferentially. As shown, the cell structure 30 is located beneath the radially spaced commissure attachment regions 10, 10′, 10″ and attached with the lower end of the commissure attachment portions 12, 12′, 12″. The commissure attachment portions 12, 12′, 12″ are designed so as to receive commissure edges of the leaflets of a valvular prosthesis. For this reason, the commissure attachment portions 12, 12′, 12″ comprise a plurality of fastening holes (
The cell structure 30 may be used in order to attach the cusp edges of a valvular prosthesis to the frame. In the depicted embodiment, however, the cell structure 30 functions in order to protect the leaflets of the valvular prosthesis from any contact with the natural heart valve leaflets. In other words, the cell structure 30 may be used as a leaflet guard as will be described in more detail below.
Further to the cell structure 30 and the radially spaced commissure attachment regions 10, 10′, 10″, the inventive frame comprises at least one, in particular three, anchoring/positioning arches 20, 20′, 20″. The anchoring/positioning arches 20, 20′, 20″ radially overlap the cell structure 30 at least partially. In other words, the anchoring/positioning arches 20, 20′, 20″ are positioned at a radial distance from the flow axis, which is further than the radial distance of the cell structure 30 from the flow axis. That is, the anchoring/positioning arches 20, 20′, 20″ extend radially outwards relative to the cell structure 30.
Moreover, each of the positioning arches 20, 20′, 20″ comprises an eyelet 21, 21′, 21″ at a distal end thereof. The eyelets 21, 21′, 21″ may be used in order to carry radiopaque markers (not shown) that help with introducing the inventive frame into a patient's blood vessel.
Each of the at least one anchoring/positioning arches 20, 20′, 20″ is rigidly attached to two neighboring commissure attachment regions 10, 10′, 10″. According to the embodiment shown in
The first embodiment described by
The retaining arches 40, 40′, 40″ provide for a better support of the inventive frame 1 at the desired implantation site and provide for an attachment region for the cusp edge of the leaflets of the valvular prosthesis. In more detail, the cusp edge of a valvular prosthesis can be sutured to the respective arms 40a, 40a′, 40a″, 40b, 40b′, 40b″ of the retaining arches 40, 40′, 40″ by means of threads or wires. In order to improve the attachment of the valvular prosthesis with the arms 40a, 40a′, 40″, 40b, 40b′, 40b″ of the retaining arches 40, 40′, 40″ each of the arms 40a, 40a′, 40a″, 40b, 40b′, 40b″ may comprise a plurality of notches which are arranged substantially along substantially the hole range of the retaining arches 40, 40′, 40″. The notches 41 may further assist the flexibility of the retaining arches 40, 40′, 40″ and hence the retaining arches 40, 40′, 40″ can easily be adapted to the cusp edge of the prosthetic leaflets. In addition or as an alternative to the notches, the retaining arches 40, 40′, 40″ may be provided with a plurality of fastening holes, distributed along the retaining arms 40a, 40a′, 40a″, 40b, 40b′, 40b″.
Particularly shown in
Adjacent arms of two neighboring retaining arches 40, 40′, 40″ or positioning arches 20, 20′, 20″ merge at one of the commissure attachment regions 10, 10′, 10″, near the outflow end region 3 of the frame. Therefore, the retaining arches 40, 40′, 40″ and the positioning arches 20, 20′, 20″ are connected to each other near the outflow end region 3, particularly via the commissure attachment portions 12, 12′, 12″ of the commissure attachment regions 10, 10′, 10″.
As already mentioned above, the first and second arms 40a, 40a′, 40a″, 40b, 40b′, 40b″ of the retaining arches 40, 40′, 40″ intersect the cell structure 30 of the frame 1 according to the first embodiment. Due to this, the cell structure 30 comprises a first cell region 31 composed of a plurality of first cells, arranged between the respective first and second arms 40a, 40b, 40a′, 40b′, 40a″, 40b″ of each retaining arch 40, 40′, 40″ and a second cell region 32, composed of a plurality of second cells. In contrast to the first cells of the first cell region 31, the second cells of the second cell region 32 are arranged between adjacent arms of two neighboring retaining arches 40, 40′, 40″. One example of the second cells 32, 32′, 32″ can be derived from the perspective side view of
Each of the first cells and/or second cells of the first and second cell region 31, 31′, 31″, 32, 32′, 32″ is formed by a plurality of struts 311, 321 which are connected with retaining arches 40, 40′, 40″ or each other respectively such that an onion-shaped cell structure is formed. The density of the first cell region 31, 31′,31″ is substantially equal to the density of the second cell region 32, 32′, 32″. Alternatively, it is also feasible to manufacture the frame 1 with first and second cell regions 31, 31′, 31″, 32, 32′, 32″ having different cell densities. In this regard, it is most preferable to construct the cell regions 31, 31′, 31″ in such a way that the density of the second cell region 32, 32′, 32″ is denser than the density of the first cell region 31, 31′, 31″.
The first and second cell regions 31, 31′, 31″ and 32, 32′, 32″ respectively have different functions in the depicted embodiment. The second cell region 32, 32′, 32″, on the one hand, provides for the requisite annular stability of the frame 1. The first cell region 31, 31′, 31″, which is arranged between the two arms 40a, 40a′, 40a″, 40b, 40b′, 40b″ of each respective retaining arm 40, 40′, 40″, on the other hand, is configured as a leaflet guard. That is, the first cell 31, 31′, 31″ region mainly stops the native heart valve leaflets from contacting the leaflets of the valvular prosthesis which can be attached to the inside of the frame 1. Of course, the first cell regions 31, 31′, 31″ also provides for some stability of the inventive frame 1.
The annular collar 50 may constitute at least one flared and/or tapered section of the frame for improving fixation of the frame 1 in the position of the diseased valve of the patient and for preventing antegrade migration of the frame having a prosthetic valve affixed thereto. The embodiment shown in
The particular flared and/or tapered shape of the annular collar 50 is preferably only visible in the expanded state of the frame 1, as can be derived from a comparison of
The external stimulus can be a definable switching temperate bridge, which is preferably in the range of between room temperature and body temperature of the patient, so as to enable the frame 1 to expand as soon as the frame 1 gets in contact with the blood of the patient.
The present invention further relates to a method for manufacturing the radially collapsible frame 1. This method shall be described in more detail with reference to
After cutting the stent pattern by means of laser radiation, a shape-setting process is carried out in order to rearrange the direction of the anchoring/positioning arches 20, 20′, 20″. In this way, the final structure of the radially collapsible frame 1, shown in
Bending the anchoring/positioning arches 20, 20′, 20″ downward towards the inflow 2 of the inventive frame may be implemented by applying a heat treatment process to the stent pattern. To this end, the stent pattern shown in
A second embodiment of the inventive radially collapsible frame can be derived from
The radially commissure attachment regions 110, 110′, 110″ are connected to each other by means of a cell structure which is composed of a plurality of lattice cells which are arranged around a flow axis (not shown) of the frame 100. As shown, the cell structure 130 is located between the radially spaced attachment regions 110, 110′, 110″ and attached with the lower end of the commissure attachment portions 112, 112′, 112″. The commissure attachment portions 112, 112′, 112″ comprise a plurality of fastening holes 113, providing a means for suturing the valvular prosthesis to frame 100. According to the second embodiment, the retaining portions 111, 111′, 111″ are not directly attached to the commissure attachment regions 110, 110′, 110″. Instead, as will be described in more detail below, the retaining portions 111, 111′, 111″ are attached to the anchoring/positioning arches 120, 120′, 120″ of the second embodiment.
Unlike the first embodiment, the inventive frame 100 according to the second embodiment does not comprise any retaining arches. For this reason, the cell structure 130 is used in order to attach the cusp edges of a valvular prosthesis to the frame 100. At the same time, the cell structure 130 of the second embodiment functions in order to protect the leaflets of the valvular prosthesis from any contact with the natural heart valve leaflets. That is, the cell structure 130 may be used as an attachment means and as a leaflet guard at the same time.
Further to the cell structure 130 and the radially spaced commissure attachment regions 110, 110′, 110″, the inventive frame 100 comprises at least one, in particular three, anchoring/positioning arches 120, 120′, 120″. The anchoring/positioning arches 120, 120′, 120″ radially overlap the cell structure 30 at least partially. In other words, the anchoring/positioning arches 120, 120′, 120″ are positioned at a radial distance at a flow axis, which is further than the radial distance of the cell structure 130 from the flow axis. That is, the anchoring/positioning arches 120, 120′, 120″ expand radially outwards relative to the cell structure 130. Each of the three anchoring/position arches 120, 120′, 120″ comprises two arms 120a, 120b, 120a′, 120b′, 120a″, 120b″ which are connected to each other at the inflow end 102 of the frame 100. In general, the anchoring/positioning arches exhibit the same features as the anchoring/positioning arches according to the first embodiment of the frame.
In contrast to the first embodiment, however, the positioning arches 120, 120′, 120″ of the second embodiment are not integrally formed together with the rest of the stent frame, such as the cell structure 130 and the commissure attachment region 110, 110′, 110″, shown in
At the proximal end of the anchoring/positioning arches 120, 120′, 120″, retaining portions 111, 111′, 111″ are provided. The retaining portions 111, 111′, 111″ may comprise eyelets (not shown) which can be used in order to temporarily attach the inventive frame 100 to a medical insertion device. Alternatively, the retaining portions 111, 111′, 111″ could be received by grooves of a retaining element attached to the insertion device. The retaining portions 111, 111′, 111″ may comprise the depicted round shape. However, it is also conceivable to form the retaining portions 111, 111′, 111″ in any other shape, such as rectangular or polygonal shapes.
In order to manufacture the radially collapsible frame 100 of the second embodiment, it is not necessary to bend the anchoring/positioning arches 120, 120′, 120″ downward in a shape-setting process, after the stent pattern has been cut out of a hollow tube. Rather, the anchoring/positioning arches 120, 120′, 120″ are produced individually and attached in a separate manufacturing process step. This alternative manufacturing method has the advantage that no bending processes are introduced into the anchoring/positioning arches 120, 120′, 120″ during the shape setting process.
Finally it should be noted that the inventive frame 100 according to the second embodiment does not comprise a particular annular collar. Instead, the second embodiment of the inventive collapsible frame 100 comprises three additional support structures 140, 140′, 140″ as can be derived from
A third embodiment of the inventive radially collapsible frame is shown in
Compared to the cell structure 130 of the second embodiment, the cell structure 230 of the third embodiment comprises a smaller amount of lattice cells in the longitudinal direction of frame 200. In particular, the third embodiment shown in
Each of the commissure attachment arms 215a, 215b, 215a′, 215b′, 215a″, 215b″ comprises a plurality of notches 241, which have already been described with respect to the embodiment shown in
All above mentioned and described embodiments and preferred embodiments will be appreciated by the skilled person to be workable also in other combinations of the features not explicitly described and such combinations will also be within the scope and disclosure of the invention. In particular, the frame of the first embodiment only optionally comprises retaining arches as depicted by the figures. Similar to the second and third embodiment, these retaining arches could be completely replaced by the cell structure, which could be used in order to attach the valvular prosthesis. Furthermore, the inventive frame could comprise more or fewer flared or tapered portions in its longitudinal direction. Finally, it should be noted that the frame is not restricted to the shape memory material Nitinol. Of course, any other suitable shape memory material is feasible especially in view of the bending stresses during the manufacturing as described above.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
13182346 | Aug 2013 | EP | regional |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2014/065817 | 7/23/2014 | WO | 00 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2015/028209 | 3/5/2015 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3755823 | Hancock | Sep 1973 | A |
4485816 | Krumme | Dec 1984 | A |
4502488 | Degironimo et al. | Mar 1985 | A |
4922905 | Strecker | May 1990 | A |
4994077 | Dobben | Feb 1991 | A |
5002566 | Carpentier et al. | Mar 1991 | A |
5026377 | Burton et al. | Jun 1991 | A |
5035706 | Giantureo et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
5053008 | Bajaj | Oct 1991 | A |
5061277 | Carpentier et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5094661 | Levy et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5104407 | Lam et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
5163953 | Vince | Nov 1992 | A |
5197979 | Quintero et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5211183 | Wilson | May 1993 | A |
5234447 | Kaster et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5279612 | Eberhardt | Jan 1994 | A |
5332402 | Teitelbaum | Jul 1994 | A |
5336258 | Quintero et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5350399 | Erlebacher et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5352240 | Ross | Oct 1994 | A |
5368608 | Levy et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5411552 | Andersen et al. | May 1995 | A |
5429144 | Wilk | Jul 1995 | A |
5456713 | Chuter | Oct 1995 | A |
5509930 | Love | Apr 1996 | A |
5540712 | Kleshinski et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5549666 | Hata et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5595571 | Jaffe et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5609626 | Quijano et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5613982 | Goldstein | Mar 1997 | A |
5632778 | Goldstein | May 1997 | A |
5643278 | Wijay | Jul 1997 | A |
5655548 | Nelson et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5674298 | Levy et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5679112 | Levy et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5683451 | Lenker et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5697972 | Kim et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5713953 | Vallana et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5733325 | Robinson et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5746775 | Levy et al. | May 1998 | A |
5755777 | Chuter | May 1998 | A |
5817113 | Gifford, III et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5824041 | Lenker et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5824080 | Lamuraglia | Oct 1998 | A |
5840081 | Andersen et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5841382 | Walden et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5843181 | Jaffe et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5855601 | Bessler et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5876434 | Flomenblit et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5880242 | Hu et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5885238 | Stevens et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5891160 | Williamson, IV et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5899936 | Goldstein | May 1999 | A |
5928281 | Huynh et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5935163 | Gabbay | Aug 1999 | A |
B151044 | Lam et al. | Sep 1999 | I5 |
5957949 | Leonhardt et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5987344 | West | Nov 1999 | A |
6001126 | Nguyen-Thien-Nhon | Dec 1999 | A |
5061277 | Carpentier et al. | Feb 2000 | B1 |
6077297 | Robinson et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6093530 | McIlroy et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6102944 | Huynh et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6117169 | Moe | Sep 2000 | A |
6126685 | Lenker et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6168614 | Andersen et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6177514 | Pathak et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6183481 | Lee et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6200336 | Pavcnik et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6214055 | Simionescu et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6231602 | Carpentier et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6241738 | Dereume | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6254564 | Wilk et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6254636 | Peredo | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6273876 | Klima et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6283995 | Moe et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6287338 | Sarnowski et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6338740 | Carpentier | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6342070 | Nguyen-Thien-Nhon | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6344044 | Fulkerson et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6350278 | Lenker et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6352547 | Brown et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6379740 | Rinaldi et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6391538 | Vyavahare et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6425916 | Garrison et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6454799 | Schreck | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6471723 | Ashworth et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6478819 | Moe | Nov 2002 | B2 |
6508833 | Pavcnik et al. | Jan 2003 | B2 |
6509145 | Torrianni | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6521179 | Girardot et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6540782 | Snyders | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6558417 | Peredo | May 2003 | B2 |
6558418 | Carpentier et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
6572642 | Rinaldi et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6582462 | Andersen et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6585766 | Huynh et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6613086 | Moe et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6682559 | Myers et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6730118 | Spenser et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6736845 | Marquez et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6767362 | Schreck | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6776791 | Stallings et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6790230 | Beyersdorf et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6808529 | Fulkerson | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6821211 | Otten et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6821297 | Snyders | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6824970 | Vyavahare et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6830584 | Seguin | Dec 2004 | B1 |
6861211 | Levy et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6872226 | Cali et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6881199 | Wilk et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6893460 | Spenser et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6908481 | Cribier | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6911043 | Myers et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6945997 | Huynh et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6974474 | Pavcnik et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
7014655 | Barbarash et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7018406 | Seguin et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7037333 | Myers et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7050276 | Nishiyama | May 2006 | B2 |
7078163 | Torrianni | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7081132 | Cook et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7101396 | Artof et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7137184 | Schreck et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7141064 | Scott et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7163556 | Xie et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7189259 | Simionescu et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7198646 | Figulla et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7201772 | Schwammenthal et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7238200 | Lee et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7252682 | Seguin | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7318278 | Zhang et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7318998 | Goldstein et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7322932 | Xie et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7329278 | Seguin et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7381218 | Schreck | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7393360 | Spenser et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7399315 | Iobbi | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7452371 | Pavcnik et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7473275 | Marquez | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7896915 | Guyenot et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7914575 | Guyenot et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
8398704 | Straubinger | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8465540 | Straubinger | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8790395 | Straubinger | Jul 2014 | B2 |
9439759 | Straubinger | Sep 2016 | B2 |
20010011187 | Pavcnik et al. | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20010021872 | Bailey et al. | Sep 2001 | A1 |
20010039450 | Pavcnik et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020010489 | Gayzel et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020032481 | Gabbay | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020035390 | Schaldach et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020045846 | Kaplon et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020045929 | Diaz | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020055775 | Carpentier et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020120322 | Thompson et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020120323 | Thompson et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020123790 | White et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020133226 | Marquez et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020143387 | Soetikno et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020151970 | Garrison et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020161426 | Iancea | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020177840 | Farnholtz | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020198594 | Schreck | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030027332 | Lafrance et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030036791 | Philipp et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030036795 | Andersen et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030040792 | Gabbay | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030050694 | Yang et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030055495 | Pease et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030065386 | Weadock | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030114913 | Spenser et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030125795 | Pavcnik et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030139796 | Sequin et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030139803 | Sequin et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030149476 | Damm et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030153974 | Spenser et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030195620 | Huynh et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030236570 | Cook et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040006380 | Buck et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040039436 | Spenser et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040049262 | Obermiller et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040073289 | Hartley et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040078950 | Schreck et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040093060 | Seguin et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040093063 | Wright et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040117004 | Osborne et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040117009 | Cali et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040148018 | Carpentier et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040153145 | Simionescu et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040186558 | Pavcnik et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040186563 | Lobbi | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040186565 | Schreck | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040193244 | Hartley et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040206363 | McCarthy et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040210301 | Obermiller et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040210304 | Seguin et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040210306 | Quijano et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040243143 | Corcoran et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040249343 | Cioanta | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040260389 | Case et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050009000 | Wilhelm et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050033220 | Wilk et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050033398 | Seguin | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050043790 | Seguin | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050049692 | Numamoto et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050060018 | Dittman | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050075725 | Rowe | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050075776 | Cho | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050096726 | Sequin et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050096736 | Osse et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050098547 | Cali et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050113902 | Geiser et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050113910 | Paniagua et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050119728 | Sarac | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050119736 | Zilla et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050125075 | Meade et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050137499 | Sheets et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050137609 | Guiraudon | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050137682 | Justino | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050137687 | Salahieh et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050137688 | Salahieh et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050137690 | Salahieh et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050137697 | Salahieh et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050137698 | Salahieh et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050137702 | Haug et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050143804 | Haverkost | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050143807 | Pavcnik et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050149166 | Schaeffer et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050150775 | Zhang et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050171597 | Boatman et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050171598 | Schaeffer | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050192665 | Spenser et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050197695 | Stacchino et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050222668 | Schaeffer et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050234546 | Nugent et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050267560 | Bates | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060009842 | Huynh et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060025857 | Bergheim et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060047343 | Oviatt et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060058864 | Schaeffer et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060074484 | Huber | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060111770 | Pavcnik et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060136034 | Modesitt et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060142846 | Pavcnik et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060149360 | Schwammenthal et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060155366 | LaDuca et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060167543 | Bailey et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060193885 | Neethling et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060210597 | Hiles | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060224183 | Freudenthal | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060229561 | Huszar | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060229718 | Marquez | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060229719 | Marquez et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060246584 | Covelli | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060259134 | Schwammenthal et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060259136 | Nguyen et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060259137 | Artof et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060265056 | Nguyen et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060287717 | Rowe et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060287719 | Rowe et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060290027 | O'Connor et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060293745 | Carpentier et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070005129 | Damm et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070005131 | Taylor | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070005132 | Simionescu et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070020248 | Everaerts et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070021826 | Case et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070027535 | Purdy, Jr. et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070038291 | Case et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070038295 | Case et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070043435 | Seguin et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070050014 | Johnson | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070056346 | Spenser et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070088431 | Bourang et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070093887 | Case et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070100435 | Case et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070100440 | Figulla et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070112422 | Dehdashtian | May 2007 | A1 |
20070123700 | Ueda et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070123979 | Perier et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070142906 | Figulla et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070162103 | Case et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070173932 | Cali et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070179592 | Schaeffer | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070185565 | Schwammenthal et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070203576 | Lee et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070213813 | Von Segesser et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070239271 | Nguyen | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070244551 | Stobie | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070260327 | Case et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070288087 | Fearnot et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080004688 | Spenser et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080021546 | Patz et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080022504 | Melsheimer | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080033534 | Cook et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080065011 | Marchand et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080071361 | Tuval et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080071362 | Tuval et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080071363 | Tuval et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080071366 | Tuval et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080071368 | Tuval et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080071369 | Tuval et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080077236 | Letac et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080086205 | Gordy et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080097586 | Pavcnik et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080102439 | Tian et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080127707 | Kokish et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080133003 | Seguin et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080140189 | Nguyen et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080147182 | Righini et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080154355 | Benichou et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080200977 | Paul et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080215143 | Seguin | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080221703 | Que et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080255660 | Guyenot et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080255661 | Straubinger et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080262602 | Wilk et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080269878 | Iobbi | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080275549 | Rowe | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090093876 | Nitzan et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090216312 | Straubinger et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090222076 | Figulla et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20100100167 | Bortlein et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100160725 | Kiser et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100249915 | Zhang | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100249916 | Zhang | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100249917 | Zhang | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100249918 | Zhang | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100262231 | Tuval et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20110093007 | Abbott et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110208290 | Straubinger et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110208297 | Tuval et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110295363 | Girard | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110319989 | Lane et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20160158003 | Wallace | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160166384 | Olson | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20170049563 | Straubinger | Feb 2017 | A1 |
20170065410 | Straubinger | Mar 2017 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2006308187 | May 2007 | AU |
2006310681 | May 2007 | AU |
2436258 | Jan 2005 | CA |
2595233 | Jul 2006 | CA |
2627555 | May 2007 | CA |
1745727 | Mar 2006 | CN |
2762776 | Mar 2006 | CN |
1897892 | Jan 2007 | CN |
2933337 | Aug 2007 | CN |
101431963 | May 2009 | CN |
101605509 | Dec 2009 | CN |
101623217 | Jan 2010 | CN |
101700199 | May 2010 | CN |
101720211 | Jun 2010 | CN |
102271626 | Dec 2011 | CN |
4316971 | Nov 1994 | DE |
19532846 | Mar 1997 | DE |
19546692 | Jun 1997 | DE |
19633901 | Feb 1998 | DE |
20003874 | Jun 2000 | DE |
19857887 | Jul 2000 | DE |
10010073 | Sep 2001 | DE |
10010074 | Oct 2001 | DE |
10034105 | Apr 2002 | DE |
101 21 210 | Nov 2002 | DE |
19546692 | Nov 2002 | DE |
10301026 | Feb 2004 | DE |
10302447 | Jul 2004 | DE |
10335948 | Feb 2005 | DE |
10010074 | Apr 2005 | DE |
19857887 | May 2005 | DE |
10010073 | Dec 2005 | DE |
10 2005 051 849 | May 2007 | DE |
10 2005 052628 | May 2007 | DE |
20 2007 005 491 | Jul 2007 | DE |
20221871 | Oct 2008 | DE |
0084395 | Jul 1983 | EP |
0402036 | Dec 1990 | EP |
0402176 | Dec 1990 | EP |
0411118 | Feb 1991 | EP |
0458877 | Apr 1991 | EP |
0515324 | Nov 1992 | EP |
0547135 | Jun 1993 | EP |
0657147 | Jun 1995 | EP |
0 592 410 | Oct 1995 | EP |
0 592 410 | Nov 1995 | EP |
0729364 | Sep 1996 | EP |
0756498 | May 1997 | EP |
0778775 | Jun 1997 | EP |
0826346 | Mar 1998 | EP |
0896813 | Feb 1999 | EP |
0903122 | Mar 1999 | EP |
0928615 | Jul 1999 | EP |
0938877 | Sep 1999 | EP |
0986348 | Mar 2000 | EP |
1 251 805 | Oct 2000 | EP |
1041942 | Oct 2000 | EP |
1041943 | Oct 2000 | EP |
1117446 | Jul 2001 | EP |
1 233 731 | May 2002 | EP |
1206179 | May 2002 | EP |
1251804 | Oct 2002 | EP |
0 971 649 | Dec 2002 | EP |
1281357 | Feb 2003 | EP |
1281375 | Feb 2003 | EP |
1 017 868 | Sep 2003 | EP |
1354569 | Oct 2003 | EP |
1452153 | Sep 2004 | EP |
0987998 | Oct 2004 | EP |
1 087 727 | Nov 2004 | EP |
1499366 | Jan 2005 | EP |
1518518 | Mar 2005 | EP |
1 253 875 | Apr 2005 | EP |
1 251 803 | Jun 2005 | EP |
1469797 | Nov 2005 | EP |
1 690 515 | Aug 2006 | EP |
1 255 510 | Mar 2007 | EP |
1112042 | Nov 2007 | EP |
1878407 | Jan 2008 | EP |
1886649 | Feb 2008 | EP |
1 900 343 | Mar 2008 | EP |
1259195 | Oct 2008 | EP |
1980220 | Oct 2008 | EP |
1994913 | Nov 2008 | EP |
2 000 115 | Dec 2008 | EP |
2474287 | Jul 2012 | EP |
2788217 | Jul 2000 | FR |
2815844 | May 2002 | FR |
2828263 | Feb 2003 | FR |
2433700 | Jul 2007 | GB |
2440809 | Feb 2008 | GB |
52-86296 | Jul 1977 | JP |
62-227352 | Oct 1987 | JP |
1049571 | Feb 1989 | JP |
7-504091 | May 1995 | JP |
2001-526574 | Dec 2001 | JP |
2004-504111 | Feb 2002 | JP |
2002-525168 | Aug 2002 | JP |
2002-525169 | Aug 2002 | JP |
2002-536115 | Oct 2002 | JP |
2003-515386 | May 2003 | JP |
2003-523262 | Aug 2003 | JP |
2003-524504 | Aug 2003 | JP |
2004-283461 | Oct 2004 | JP |
2005-118585 | May 2005 | JP |
2007-521125 | Aug 2007 | JP |
2007-296375 | Nov 2007 | JP |
2008-539985 | Nov 2008 | JP |
2009-131397 | Jun 2009 | JP |
2009-534157 | Sep 2009 | JP |
2010-526609 | Aug 2010 | JP |
WO 9212690 | Aug 1982 | WO |
WO-9009102 | Aug 1990 | WO |
WO 9117720 | Nov 1991 | WO |
WO 9511055 | Apr 1995 | WO |
WO-9524873 | Sep 1995 | WO |
WO-9528183 | Oct 1995 | WO |
WO 9529713 | Nov 1995 | WO |
WO-9613227 | May 1996 | WO |
WO 9727893 | Aug 1997 | WO |
WO 9727898 | Aug 1997 | WO |
WO-9732615 | Sep 1997 | WO |
WO 9808456 | Mar 1998 | WO |
WO 9811846 | Mar 1998 | WO |
WO 9819633 | May 1998 | WO |
WO 9843556 | Oct 1998 | WO |
WO-9846165 | Oct 1998 | WO |
WO 9853761 | Dec 1998 | WO |
WO 9936001 | Jul 1999 | WO |
WO-9937337 | Jul 1999 | WO |
WO 9942058 | Aug 1999 | WO |
WO 9953987 | Oct 1999 | WO |
WO-9966863 | Dec 1999 | WO |
WO 0002503 | Jan 2000 | WO |
WO 0015148 | Mar 2000 | WO |
WO 0018330 | Apr 2000 | WO |
WO 0018333 | Apr 2000 | WO |
WO-0018445 | Apr 2000 | WO |
WO 0021464 | Apr 2000 | WO |
WO 200025702 | May 2000 | WO |
WO 0047139 | Aug 2000 | WO |
WO-0053125 | Sep 2000 | WO |
WO-0062714 | Oct 2000 | WO |
WO 0069367 | Nov 2000 | WO |
WO 0078226 | Dec 2000 | WO |
WO-0110209 | Feb 2001 | WO |
WO 200135870 | May 2001 | WO |
WO-0141679 | Jun 2001 | WO |
WO 2001039700 | Jun 2001 | WO |
WO 0149213 | Jul 2001 | WO |
WO-0151104 | Jul 2001 | WO |
WO 0154625 | Aug 2001 | WO |
WO-0158503 | Aug 2001 | WO |
WO 0162189 | Aug 2001 | WO |
WO 0164137 | Sep 2001 | WO |
WO 0222054 | Mar 2002 | WO |
WO 200236048 | May 2002 | WO |
WO-02058745 | Aug 2002 | WO |
WO-02100301 | Dec 2002 | WO |
WO-02102286 | Dec 2002 | WO |
WO 03003949 | Jan 2003 | WO |
WO-03007795 | Jan 2003 | WO |
WO 2003003949 | Jan 2003 | WO |
WO-03009785 | Feb 2003 | WO |
WO 03013239 | Feb 2003 | WO |
WO 2003011195 | Feb 2003 | WO |
WO 03028592 | Apr 2003 | WO |
WO 03047468 | Jun 2003 | WO |
WO 03051231 | Jun 2003 | WO |
WO-03079928 | Oct 2003 | WO |
WO 03079933 | Oct 2003 | WO |
WO 03092554 | Nov 2003 | WO |
WO 2003096935 | Nov 2003 | WO |
WO 2004004597 | Jan 2004 | WO |
WO 2004016200 | Feb 2004 | WO |
WO 2004016201 | Feb 2004 | WO |
WO 2004019825 | Mar 2004 | WO |
WO-2004026117 | Apr 2004 | WO |
WO 2004026173 | Apr 2004 | WO |
WO 2004028399 | Apr 2004 | WO |
WO 2004030515 | Apr 2004 | WO |
WO 2004043301 | May 2004 | WO |
WO 2004064671 | Aug 2004 | WO |
WO 2004082527 | Sep 2004 | WO |
WO 2004082528 | Sep 2004 | WO |
WO 2004096100 | Nov 2004 | WO |
WO 2005011534 | Feb 2005 | WO |
WO 2005021063 | Mar 2005 | WO |
WO 2005034812 | Apr 2005 | WO |
WO 2005062980 | Jul 2005 | WO |
WO 2005063980 | Jul 2005 | WO |
WO 2005070343 | Aug 2005 | WO |
WO-2005072654 | Aug 2005 | WO |
WO 2005102015 | Nov 2005 | WO |
WO 2006066327 | Jun 2006 | WO |
WO-2006066327 | Jun 2006 | WO |
WO 2006070372 | Jul 2006 | WO |
WO 2006076890 | Jul 2006 | WO |
WO 2006089517 | Aug 2006 | WO |
WO-2006102063 | Sep 2006 | WO |
WO 2006108090 | Oct 2006 | WO |
WO-2006124649 | Nov 2006 | WO |
WO 2006124649 | Nov 2006 | WO |
WO 2006127756 | Nov 2006 | WO |
WO 2006127765 | Nov 2006 | WO |
WO 2006129441 | Dec 2006 | WO |
WO-2006132948 | Dec 2006 | WO |
WO 2006133959 | Dec 2006 | WO |
WO 2007047488 | Apr 2007 | WO |
WO 2007047945 | Apr 2007 | WO |
WO 2007048529 | May 2007 | WO |
WO-2007048529 | May 2007 | WO |
WO 2007051620 | May 2007 | WO |
WO 2007059252 | May 2007 | WO |
WO-2007071436 | Jun 2007 | WO |
WO 2007098232 | Aug 2007 | WO |
WO 2007120543 | Oct 2007 | WO |
WO 2007123956 | Nov 2007 | WO |
WO-2008028569 | Mar 2008 | WO |
WO 2008031103 | Mar 2008 | WO |
WO 2008035337 | Mar 2008 | WO |
WO 2008045949 | Apr 2008 | WO |
WO 2008051554 | May 2008 | WO |
WO 2008070797 | Jun 2008 | WO |
WO 2008079962 | Jul 2008 | WO |
WO 2008098191 | Aug 2008 | WO |
WO 2008101083 | Aug 2008 | WO |
WO 2008125153 | Oct 2008 | WO |
WO 2008138584 | Nov 2008 | WO |
WO 2008150529 | Dec 2008 | WO |
WO 2009053497 | Apr 2009 | WO |
WO 2009094188 | Jul 2009 | WO |
WO 2009106545 | Sep 2009 | WO |
WO 2009149462 | Dec 2009 | WO |
WO 2011008812 | Jan 2011 | WO |
WO 2011060386 | May 2011 | WO |
WO 2011104269 | Sep 2011 | WO |
WO 2011120050 | Sep 2011 | WO |
WO 2011144351 | Nov 2011 | WO |
WO 2011147849 | Dec 2011 | WO |
WO 2012023980 | Feb 2012 | WO |
WO 2012036742 | Mar 2012 | WO |
WO 2012038550 | Mar 2012 | WO |
WO 2012039748 | Mar 2012 | WO |
WO 2012082952 | Jun 2012 | WO |
WO 2012106491 | Aug 2012 | WO |
WO 2012142189 | Oct 2012 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report for PCT/EP2014/065817, dated Jan. 7, 2015 (5 pages). |
Aortenklappenbioprothese erfolgreich in der Entwicklung, May 16, 2003 (1 page). |
English translation of Aortenklappenbioprothese erfolgreich in der Entwicklung (2 pages). |
Screen shots from http://www.fraunhofer.de/presse/filme/2006/index.jsp, 2006 (2 pages). |
Liang, Ma, et al., “Double-crowned valved stents for off-pump mitral valve replacement,” Eur. J. Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, vol. 28, pp. 194-198 (2005) (5 pages). |
Huber, Christoph H., et al. “Direct Access Valve Replacement (DAVR)—are we entering a new era in cardiac surgery?” Eur. J. Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, vol. 29, pp. 380-385 (2006) (6 pages). |
File history for German Patent DE 195 46 692 filed Dec. 14, 1995 and patented Jul. 11, 2002 (111 pages). |
Klein, Allan L. et al., “Age-related Prevalence of Valvular Regurgitation in Normal Subjects: A Comprehensive Color Flow Examination of 118 Volunteers,” J. Am. Soc. Echocardiography, vol. 3, No. 1, pp. 54-63 (1990) (10 pages). |
Gummert, J.F. et al., “Cardiac Surgery in Germany During 2007: A Report on Behalf of the German Society for Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery,” Thorac. Cardiov. Surg., vol. 56, pp. 328-336 (2008) (9 pages). |
Gummert, J.F. et al., “Cardiac Surgery in Germany During 2006: A Report on Behalf of the German Society for Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery,” Thorac. Cardiov. Surg., vol. 55, pp. 343-350 (2007) (8 pages). |
Ferrari, M.W. et al., “Transarterial Aortic Valve Replacement with a Self expanding Stent in Pigs,” Heart, vol. 90, No. 11, pp. 1326-1331 (2004). |
Ferrari, “Entwicklung eines Verfahrens zum transvaskulären Aortenklappenersatz,” Habilitationsschrift, Medizinische Fakultät der Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena, pp. 49-52, dated Sep. 2003. |
Ferrari, “Entwicklung eines Verfahrens zum transvaskulären Aortenklappenersatz,” Habilitationsschrift, Medizinische Fakultät der Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena, pp. 1-159, dated Sep. 2003. |
German National Library, bibliographic information for Ferrari, M., “Entwicklung eines Verfahrens zum transvaskulären Aortenklappenersatz,” available at https://www.deutsche-digitale-bibliothek.de/item/U2RQV45RMES4YP6AHEPGN4QPJWAMGROI. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20160213465 A1 | Jul 2016 | US |