The field of the disclosure relates generally to electric motors, and more particularly, to radially embedded permanent magnet rotors and alternative materials for use in electric motors.
Various types of electric machines include permanent magnets. For example, a brushless direct current (BLDC) motor may include a plurality of permanent magnets coupled to an exterior surface of a rotor core. Typically, the permanent magnets are coupled to the exterior surface of the rotor core using an adhesive and/or an outer retaining covering. This coupling between the permanent magnets and the rotor core must resist forces exerted on the permanent magnets during high speed rotation tending to separate the permanent magnets from the motor.
Permanent magnets may also be positioned within a rotor core, commonly referred to as an interior permanent magnet rotor. Slots are formed within the rotor, and magnets are inserted into the slots. The magnet slots must be larger than the magnets to allow the magnets to be inserted. However, the magnets must be secured within the slots to prevent movement of the magnets during operation of the machine. The performance of the machine depends on maintaining the magnets in a known position within the rotor. An adhesive may be used to secure the magnets in a fixed position relative to the rotor. However, adhesives have a limited life due to factors such as temperature, temperature cycling, and environmental conditions.
Many known electric machines produce work by generating torque, which is the product of flux, stator current and other constants. In electric motors, flux is typically produced by permanent magnets positioned on a rotor within the motor. Some known rare earth permanent magnets, such as neodymium iron boron magnets, generate greater amounts of flux than typical ferrite permanent magnets. However, the cost of rare earth magnets has drastically risen in recent years, prompting the need for low-cost permanent magnet systems that generate similar amounts of flux and provide efficiencies similar to systems using rare earth magnets.
In one embodiment, an electric machine is provided. The electric machine includes a machine housing, a stator disposed at least partially within the machine housing, and a rotor disposed at least partially within the machine housing. The stator includes at least one tooth and an aluminum winding wound around the at least one tooth. The rotor is configured to rotate with respect to the stator and is a radially embedded permanent magnet rotor configured to generate an amount of flux to reduce efficiency loss due to the aluminum winding. The rotor includes at least one permanent magnet and a substantially cylindrical rotor core comprising an outer edge and an inner edge defining a central opening. The rotor further comprising at least one pole and at least one radial aperture extending radially into the rotor core from the outer edge to a predetermined depth less than the rotor radius, wherein the at least one radial aperture configured to receive the at least one permanent magnet. The rotor also includes at least one protrusion extending into the at least one radial aperture and positioned substantially along a bottom of the at least one radial aperture such that the at least one protrusion is configured to facilitate retention of the at least one permanent magnet within the at least one radial aperture.
In yet another embodiment, a method of manufacturing a permanent magnet rotor is provided. The method includes positioning a stator at least partially within a housing, wherein the stator includes a plurality of teeth and an aluminum winding wound around at least one tooth of the plurality of teeth. The method also includes positioning a radially embedded permanent magnet rotor at least partially within the housing, wherein the rotor includes at least one pole, a radius R, an outer edge, and an inner edge defining a central opening. At least one radial aperture is radially formed into the rotor from the outer edge to a predetermined depth less than the radius, and at least one protrusion is formed extending into the at least one radial aperture. The at least one protrusion is positioned substantially at a bottom of the at least one radial aperture and configured to facilitate retention of the at least one permanent magnet within the at least one radial aperture. The method also includes inserting, in a radial direction, a permanent magnet into the at least one radial aperture, wherein the radially embedded permanent magnet rotor is configured to provide an amount of flux to reduce motor efficiency loss compared to a copper winding.
Due to increased costs of rare earth magnets and copper used for windings, lower cost alternative materials are desirable in the design and manufacture of electric motors. This disclosure provides designs and methods using material alternatives to rare earth magnets and copper windings while reducing or recapturing the efficiency losses associated with those alternative materials and reducing or eliminating an increase of the length of the motor.
Rotatable assembly 20 includes a permanent magnet rotor core 36 and a shaft 38. In the exemplary embodiment, rotor core 36 is formed from a stack of laminations made of magnetically permeable material. Alternatively, rotor core 36 is a solid core. Rotor core 36 is substantially received in a central bore of stator core 28 for rotation along an axis of rotation X.
In the exemplary embodiment, electric motor 10 is coupled to a fan or centrifugal blower (not shown) for moving air through an air handling system, for blowing air over cooling coils, and/or for driving a compressor within an air conditioning/refrigeration system. More specifically, motor 10 may be used in air moving applications used in the heating, ventilation, and air conditioning (HVAC) industry, for example, in residential applications using ⅕ horsepower (hp) to 1 hp motors. Alternatively, motor 10 may be used in fluid pumping applications. Motor 10 may also be used in commercial and industrial applications and/or hermetic compressor motors used in air conditioning applications, where motor 10 may have a rating of greater than 1 hp. Although described herein in the context of an air handling system, electric motor 10 may engage any suitable work component and be configured to drive such a work component.
Rotor core 36 is substantially cylindrical and includes an outer edge 40 and a shaft central opening or inner edge 42 having a diameter corresponding to the diameter of shaft 38. Rotor core 36 and shaft 38 are concentric and are configured to rotate about axis of rotation X (shown in
In the exemplary embodiment, rotor core 36 includes a plurality of radial apertures 46. For example, a first wall 48, a second wall 50 and a third wall 52 define a first radial aperture 54 of the plurality of radial apertures 46. Each radial aperture 46 includes a depth d and thickness t and extends axially through rotor core 36 from first end 12 (shown in
In the exemplary embodiment, rotor core 36 includes a plurality of rotor poles 58, each having an outer wall 60 along rotor outer edge 40 and an inner wall 62 (shown in
In the exemplary embodiment, the design of radially embedded permanent magnet rotor core 36 utilizes lower-cost magnets, yet achieves the power densities and high efficiency of machines using higher-cost magnets, such as neodymium magnets. In the exemplary embodiment, increased efficiency and power density of motor 10 is obtained by increasing the flux produced by rotor core 36. Increased flux generation is facilitated by magnets 56 positioned in radial apertures 46 at depth d, between a minimum magnet depth and a maximum magnet depth. The minimum magnet depth is defined by the equation:
wherein Dmin represents the minimum depth variable, R represents the rotor radius, and n represents the number of rotor poles. The maximum magnet depth is defined by the equation:
wherein Dmax represents the maximum depth variable, R represents the rotor radius, t represents the magnet thickness in the direction of magnetization, and n represents the number of rotor poles. In the exemplary embodiment, rotor core 36 facilitates increased flux production resulting in optimum efficiency and power density when magnets 56 extend into radial aperture at a depth between Dmin and Dmax.
In the exemplary embodiment, radial aperture 46 includes one or more permanent magnet retention member or protrusion 64. For example, a first pair of protrusions 66 is located proximate pole outer wall 60 along rotor outer edge 40 and extends into radial aperture 46 from first and second walls 48 and 50. Each protrusion 64 of the first pair of protrusions 66 is configured to facilitate retention of magnet 56 within radial aperture 46 by substantially preventing movement of magnet 56 in a radial direction towards outer edge 40. Further, a second pair of protrusions 68 is located along pole inner wall 62 and extends into radial aperture 46 from first and second walls 48 and 50. Each protrusion 64 of the second pair of protrusions 68 is configured to facilitate retention of magnet 56 within radial aperture 46 by substantially preventing movement of magnet 56 in a radial direction towards shaft 38. Alternatively, rotor core 36 may have any number and location of protrusions 64 that enable rotor core 36 to function as described herein.
In the exemplary embodiment, rotor poles 58 are spaced from each other a distance f to reduce flux loss through magnetic support structure (e.g. rotor poles 58). In the exemplary embodiment, distance f is greater than or equal to five times the length of air gap 72 (the gap between rotor outer edge 40 and stator inner edge 74), facilitating high flux generation. Alternatively, distance f is greater than or equal to three times the length of air gap 72. Alternatively still, distance f is greater than or equal to ten times the length of air gap 72. In the exemplary embodiment, distance f is maintained between protrusions 64. Alternatively, distance f is maintained between radial aperture walls 48 and 50 if no protrusions 64 are present, or between protrusion 64 and wall 48 or 50 if protrusion 64 is present on only one of walls 48 and 50.
In the exemplary embodiment, center lamination 80 is positioned between half-cores 76 and 78, and end laminations 82 and 84 are positioned on opposite ends of rotor core 36. In the exemplary embodiment, half-cores 76 and 78 are solid cores. Alternatively, half-cores 76 and 78 are formed as a whole core and/or are fabricated from a plurality of lamination layers. Although rotor core 36 is described with a single center lamination 80 and two end laminations 82 and 84, rotor core 36 may have any number of center and end laminations that enables motor 10 to function as described herein. Connected rotor poles 88 support rotor poles 58 at a distance from sleeve 86 to prevent flux losses in half-cores 76 and 78, since little or no magnetic material is located above or below magnets 56 positioned therein. A portion of flux generated by rotor core 36 is lost, however, due at least in part to connected rotor poles 88 of laminations 80, 82 and 84. In order to minimize flux losses, in the exemplary embodiment, the sum of the thicknesses of laminations having connected rotor poles 88 is less than or equal to 12% of the total length of rotor core 36. Alternatively, the sum of the thicknesses of laminations having connected rotor poles 88 is less than or equal to 2% of the total length of rotor core 36. Alternatively still, the sum of the thicknesses of laminations having connected rotor poles 88 is less than or equal to 1% of the total length of rotor core 36.
In the exemplary embodiment, each first indentation 102 is substantially aligned with a corresponding second indentation 104 to define a space 106. Alternatively, first indentations 102 are formed without forming second indentations 104, and vice versa. Space 106 is configured to receive a retention material 108, which is configured to at least partially fill space 106 and cause interference between the surfaces of indentations 102 and 104 to substantially resist or prevent movement of magnet 56 within radial aperture 46. For example, retention material 108 frictionally engages the surfaces of indentations 102 and 104 and prevents magnet 56 from moving radially relative to radial aperture 46, which can result in unwanted noise or magnet dislocation. Further, retention material 108 is configured to prevent general side-to-side motion of magnet 56, which can occur due to tolerance stack-up and can result in unwanted noise from magnets 56 rattling against the faces of rotor poles 58. Retention material 108 may be formed from one segment or multiple segments and extend through the full length or through only a portion of rotor core 36.
In the exemplary embodiment, retention material 108 may be any material or member that at least partially fills space 106 and substantially prevents movement of magnet 56 within radial aperture 46. For example, as illustrated in
In the exemplary embodiment, two rotated laminations 124 are positioned on rotor first end 12. Additionally, one or more rotated laminations 124 are positioned on rotor second end 14. However, any number of rotated laminations 124 may be positioned anywhere throughout the stack of laminations 44 that enables rotor core 36 to function as described herein. For example, rotated lamination 124 may be located substantially within the center of the lamination stack of rotor core 36. In the exemplary embodiment, rotated lamination 124 is fabricated from steel. Alternatively, rotated lamination 124 is formed from any non-magnetic material such as aluminum or molded plastic.
In the exemplary embodiment, each permanent magnet 56 is positioned within one radial aperture 46 by inserting magnet 56 therethrough in an axial direction parallel to axis X. Alternatively, each permanent magnet 56 is inserted into one radial aperture 46 in a direction radial to hub 114, for example, when protrusions 64 are not present on outer edge 40. Each permanent magnet 56 includes a first polarity pole N and a second polarity pole S. In the exemplary embodiment, magnets 56 are arranged within radial aperture 46 such that each pole N faces one connected rotor pole 116 and each pole S faces one independent rotor pole 118. This arrangement results in little or no flux leakage because each rotor pole 116 and 118 is only in contact with the same magnetic polarity. Alternatively, magnets 56 are arranged such that each pole S faces one connected rotor pole 116 and each pole N faces one independent rotor pole 118.
In the exemplary embodiment, radial aperture 46 includes first and second walls 48 and 50 defined by rotor poles 58. A retention material 108 is positioned within radial aperture 46 and space 106 between magnet 56 and first and second walls 48 and 50. An annular end plate (not shown) is positioned on rotor core ends. In the exemplary embodiment, retention material 108 is an injection molded polymer. However, retention material 108 may be any suitable material that enables rotor core 36 to function as described herein. Additionally, retention material 108 may be positioned between magnet 56 and an outer edge 40 of rotor core 36. In the exemplary embodiment, sleeve 138 and rotor poles 58 are fabricated from steel. However, sleeve 138 and rotor poles 58 may be formed from any suitable material that enables rotor core 36 to function as described herein. Alternatively, sleeve 138 may be excluded and central hub 140 is directly coupled to shaft 38. In the exemplary embodiment, central hub 140 is fabricated from an injection molded polymer. However, central hub 140 may be formed from any suitable non-magnetic material that enables rotor core 36 to function as described herein. For example, central hub 140 may be a machined, extruded or die cast non-magnetic material such as aluminum or zinc. Alternatively, central hub 140 is fabricated from an isolation damping material configured to reduce transmission of at least one of motor torque pulsations, motor torque ripple, and motor torque cogging.
An exemplary method of manufacturing rotor core 36 is described herein. Sleeve 138, rotor poles 58 and permanent magnets 56 are located substantially symmetrically in a mold (not shown). Alternatively, sleeve 138 may be excluded. Rotor poles 58 and sleeve 138 are a solid structure or laminated structure held together with interlocks, rivets, bolts, and/or other fasteners. In the exemplary embodiment, pre-formed magnets 56 are inserted into radial apertures 46 defined between rotor poles 58. Alternatively, a polymer bonded magnet material is injected into the radial apertures 46 to form permanent magnets 56. In the exemplary embodiment, a non-magnetic polymer is injection molded into the region between rotor poles 58 and magnets 56, in the region between magnets 56 and rotor outer edge 40, and in spaces 106 defined by indentations 102 and 104. The polymer is further injection molded in the region between sleeve 138 and rotor poles 58 and magnets 56 to form central hub 140. In this way, the injection molding process magnetically isolates rotor poles 58 and magnets 56 on the outer diameter of rotor 36 and orients rotor poles 58 and magnets 56 at a predetermined diameter equal to a desired rotor outer diameter. Magnets 56 may be magnetized before insertion into the mold or may be magnetized after the molding process. Alternatively, central hub 140 is a pre-formed non-magnetic material, for example zinc or aluminum, that is inserted into the mold after magnets 56 are installed and magnetized. An annular end plate (not shown) is then positioned on rotor core ends. Alternatively, sleeve 138 and rotor poles 58 are located substantially symmetrically in the mold. A high strength polymer material with a high first processing temperature (e.g. glass-filled Rynite material) is injection molded in the region between sleeve 138 and rotor poles 58 to form central hub 140. The processing temperature is the temperature at which a material can be processed in a conventional injection molding process and is above the higher of the melting point and the glass transition temperature. Permanent magnets 56 are then inserted into radial apertures 46 defined between rotor poles 58, and a polymer material with a lower second processing temperature (e.g. glass-filled Crastin) is molded in the remaining space around magnets 56. This two-step molding process prevents performing the high temperature material injection while magnets 56 are in the mold, which may reduce the effectiveness of magnets 56.
In the exemplary embodiment, radial aperture 46 receives one or more magnet 56 and a retention material 108 is positioned within radial aperture 46 between magnet 56 and rotor outer edge 40. As illustrated in
An exemplary method of manufacturing rotor core 36 is described herein. Rotor core 36 is fabricated by punching multiple interlocked laminations that each includes a sleeve 138 and a plurality of rotor poles 58. The laminations are stacked and may or may not be indexed to reduce rotor imbalances. One or more magnets 56 are positioned radially about sleeve 138 between rotor poles 58 by inserting each magnet 56 axially and/or radially into radial aperture 46. One or more end laminations 154 are positioned on rotor core end 12 and/or 14, and rotor core 36 is located in a mold (not shown). Optionally, a plurality of rotor poles 158 of end lamination 154 may be mechanically disconnected from a hub 156 by breaking or shearing webs 160. A non-magnetic polymer is injection molded into the region between rotor poles 58 and magnets 56, in the region between magnets 56 and rotor outer edge 40, and in the region between sleeve 138 and rotor poles 58 and magnets 56 to form central hub 140. The polymer may also be injection molded over mechanically disconnected webs 160. In this way, the injection molding process magnetically isolates rotor poles 58 and magnets 56 on the outer diameter of rotor 36 and orients rotor poles 58 and magnets 56 at a predetermined diameter equal to a desired rotor outer diameter. Magnets 56 may be magnetized before insertion into the mold, or may be magnetized during or after the molding process. End lamination 154 may be coupled to rotor core 36 before, during or after the molding process.
In the exemplary embodiment, radial aperture 46 receives one or more permanent magnet 56. A molded material (e.g. injection molded polymer) may be positioned within radial aperture 46 between magnet 56 and rotor outer edge 40 and between magnet 56 and outer hub 164. Similarly, the material is positioned in a space 166 between outer hub 164 and inner hub 162 to form a central hub (not shown). Inner and outer hubs 162 and 164 each include protrusions 168, which facilitate increased torque transmission therebetween. In the exemplary embodiment, inner and outer hubs 162 and 164 are fabricated from a non-magnetic material (e.g. aluminum). Alternatively, hubs 162 and 164 are fabricated from any non-magnetic material that enables rotor 36 to function as described herein. Alternatively, inner hub 162 is fabricated from a magnetic material.
An exemplary method of manufacturing rotor core 36 is described herein. Inner hub 162, outer hub 164, rotor poles 58 and magnets 56 are located substantially symmetrically in a mold (not shown). Rotor poles 58 and hubs 162 and 164 are a solid structure or a laminated structure held together with interlocks, rivets, bolts, and/or other fasteners. Magnets 56 are inserted into radial apertures 46 or a magnetic material is injected therein to form magnets 56. A non-magnetic polymer is injection molded into space 166 between outer hub 164 and inner hub 162, between rotor outer edge 40 and magnet 56, and between magnet 56 and outer hub 164. In this way, rotor poles 58 and magnets 56 are magnetically isolated on the outer diameter of rotor 36 and rotor poles 58 and magnets 56 are oriented at a predetermined diameter equal to a desired rotor diameter. Magnets 56 may be magnetized before insertion into the mold or may be magnetized after the molding process. Alternatively, rotor poles 58 and hubs 162 and 164 are located in the mold and a high-strength material with a high first processing temperature is injection molded in space 166 to form a central hub. Permanent magnets 56 are then inserted into radial apertures 46 defined between rotor poles 58, and a lower second processing temperature material is molded in the remaining space around magnets 56. This two-step molding process prevents performing the high processing temperature material injection while magnets 56 are in the mold, which may reduce the effectiveness of magnets 56.
In the embodiments described above, electric motor 10 includes stator core 28, which includes windings 32. Typically, windings 32 are fabricated from copper, which makes up a significant part of the motor material cost. In one exemplary embodiment, windings 32 are formed from aluminum instead of copper. However, aluminum has approximately 60% of the resistivity of copper and lowers motor efficiency. One way to reduce the loss of efficiency is to increase the length of stator core 28 and rotor core 36. However, increased motor length is undesirable from a material cost standpoint as well as an application standpoint (e.g. the longer motor may not fit in a desired user application). In order to reduce or recover the efficiency loss associated with aluminum windings while minimizing an increase in the length of motor 10, radially embedded permanent magnet rotor 36 described above is used. Radially embedded permanent magnet rotor 36 generates more flux than other common rotor designs using ferrite magnets. Radially embedded permanent magnet rotor 36 results in increased torque, which makes up for the loss in efficiency.
Moreover, in the exemplary embodiment, windings 206 are designed or optimized so that the knee of the speed-torque curve of motor 200 is operating at substantially the full load operating point required by motor 200 for a desired application. The knee of the speed-torque curve is the motor speed at which the motor transitions from the voltage control region to the current control region.
In the exemplary embodiment, the length of rotor 302 (compared to the original rotor) is dependent on the higher operation speed desired by the new application. For example, in one embodiment, motor 300 is originally designed to operate at a typical speed of 1,200 RPM and includes a stator and rotor with lengths of approximately 1.75 inches. The new motor application requires motor 300 to operate at 6,000 RPM, and motor 300 is fitted with modified, reduced-length rotor 302, which is approximately 1 inch in length. As described above, motor 300 is modified with rotor 302 and/or windings 306 to enable motor 300 to be used for high speed applications without having to design a new motor platform specifically designed for the high speed application.
Described herein are exemplary methods, systems and apparatus utilizing lower cost materials in a permanent magnet motor that reduces or eliminates the efficiency loss caused by the lower cost material. Furthermore, the exemplary methods system and apparatus achieve increased efficiency while reducing or eliminating an increase of the length of the motor. The methods, system and apparatus described herein may be used in any suitable application. However, they are particularly suited for HVAC and pump applications.
Exemplary embodiments of the electric motor assembly are described above in detail. The electric motor and its components are not limited to the specific embodiments described herein, but rather, components of the systems may be utilized independently and separately from other components described herein. For example, the components may also be used in combination with other motor systems, methods, and apparatuses, and are not limited to practice with only the systems and apparatus as described herein. Rather, the exemplary embodiments can be implemented and utilized in connection with many other applications.
Although specific features of various embodiments of the disclosure may be shown in some drawings and not in others, this is for convenience only. In accordance with the principles of the disclosure, any feature of a drawing may be referenced and/or claimed in combination with any feature of any other drawing.
This written description uses examples to disclose the invention, including the best mode, and also to enable any person skilled in the art to practice the invention, including making and using any devices or systems and performing any incorporated methods. The patentable scope of the invention is defined by the claims, and may include other examples that occur to those skilled in the art. Such other examples are intended to be within the scope of the claims if they have structural elements that do not differ from the literal language of the claims, or if they include equivalent structural elements with insubstantial differences from the literal languages of the claims.
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/969,677, filed Dec. 15, 2015, which is a continuation of U.S. Pat. No. 9,246,364, filed Oct. 15, 2012, both of which are hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1298465 | Dean | Mar 1919 | A |
2059518 | Harley | Nov 1936 | A |
2312101 | Killam et al. | Feb 1943 | A |
2486656 | Klinkhamer | Nov 1949 | A |
2498704 | Oswald | Feb 1950 | A |
2519919 | Merrill | Aug 1950 | A |
2794137 | Faus et al. | May 1957 | A |
2927229 | Merrill | Mar 1960 | A |
3111596 | Lovegrove | Nov 1963 | A |
3210582 | Miller | Oct 1965 | A |
3221194 | Blackburn | Nov 1965 | A |
3235758 | Dinsmore | Feb 1966 | A |
3344325 | Sklaroff | Sep 1967 | A |
3417295 | Littwin | Dec 1968 | A |
3466518 | Aylikci et al. | Sep 1969 | A |
3513341 | Gratzmuller | May 1970 | A |
3555324 | Lovegrove | Jan 1971 | A |
3599024 | Kitamura | Aug 1971 | A |
3872334 | Loubier | Mar 1975 | A |
3943392 | Keuper et al. | Mar 1976 | A |
3950663 | Mead | Apr 1976 | A |
3979821 | Noodleman | Sep 1976 | A |
4059898 | Adair | Nov 1977 | A |
4104787 | Jandeska et al. | Aug 1978 | A |
4143289 | Williams | Mar 1979 | A |
4327302 | Hershberger | Apr 1982 | A |
4434546 | Hershberger | Mar 1984 | A |
4445062 | Glaser | Apr 1984 | A |
4614888 | Mosher et al. | Sep 1986 | A |
4631807 | Kawada et al. | Dec 1986 | A |
4658167 | Popov et al. | Apr 1987 | A |
4692432 | Tedder | Sep 1987 | A |
4700097 | Kawada et al. | Oct 1987 | A |
4725750 | Welch | Feb 1988 | A |
4741094 | Denk et al. | May 1988 | A |
4777397 | Parshall | Oct 1988 | A |
4954736 | Kawamoto et al. | Sep 1990 | A |
4977344 | Obradovic | Dec 1990 | A |
5010266 | Uchida | Apr 1991 | A |
5023502 | Johnson | Jun 1991 | A |
5091668 | Cuenot et al. | Feb 1992 | A |
5140211 | Ucida | Aug 1992 | A |
5157297 | Uchida | Oct 1992 | A |
5200662 | Tagami et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
5411608 | Hazelton et al. | May 1995 | A |
5500994 | Itaya | Mar 1996 | A |
5557248 | Prochazka | Sep 1996 | A |
5645651 | Fujimura et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5684352 | Mita et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5786650 | Uchida et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5786652 | Gueraud et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5806169 | Trago et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5818141 | Cho et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5829120 | Uchida et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5889346 | Uchida et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5990592 | Miura et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6200662 | Mussallem, III | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6218753 | Asano et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6234767 | Takeda et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6265802 | Getschmann | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6340857 | Nishiyama et al. | Jan 2002 | B2 |
6359366 | Liang et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6389538 | Gruse et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6392324 | Kuwahara | May 2002 | B1 |
6426576 | Varenne | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6452301 | Van Dine et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6519833 | Futami et al. | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6657349 | Fukushima | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6674213 | Berger | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6703741 | Ifrim | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6707209 | Crapo et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6785951 | Carl et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6794839 | Maslov et al. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6919663 | Iles-Klumpner | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6987342 | Hans | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7091645 | Yoneda et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7148598 | Ionel et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7157827 | Heideman et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7332845 | Heideman et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7626349 | Marcinkiewicz et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7800272 | Nakayama et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7868503 | Nakayama et al. | Jan 2011 | B1 |
7932658 | Ionel | Apr 2011 | B2 |
8004140 | Alexander et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8018110 | Alexander et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8080907 | Jeung | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8102091 | Ionel | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8138649 | Bradfield | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8482179 | Nakamura et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8633630 | Pan | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8692432 | Kingrey et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8704472 | Nashiki | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8981609 | Joeckel | Mar 2015 | B2 |
9083219 | Choi et al. | Jul 2015 | B2 |
9281723 | Watanabe et al. | Mar 2016 | B2 |
20030052561 | Rahman et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030107290 | De Filippis | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030214194 | Carl et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040004407 | Laurent et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040124728 | Yamaguchi et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040245881 | Kadoya | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050088052 | Ionel et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050093391 | McMullen et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20060061227 | Heideman et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060290222 | Shen et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20080246362 | Hirzel | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20100308682 | Horng et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110115126 | Matsubayashi et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110127859 | Amrhein et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110148239 | Nakamura et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110298330 | Joeckel | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120104907 | Zeng et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120132783 | Jia | May 2012 | A1 |
20120139373 | Jia et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120139381 | Kingrey et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120181895 | Pan | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120194011 | Liu et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120299429 | Choi et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
102111025 | Jun 2011 | CN |
102468051 | May 2012 | CN |
102570735 | Jul 2012 | CN |
2159342 | Nov 1985 | GB |
55133654 | Oct 1980 | JP |
57186964 | Nov 1982 | JP |
08214479 | Aug 1996 | JP |
2002218683 | Aug 2002 | JP |
2012125076 | Jun 2012 | JP |
20090079681 | Jul 2009 | KR |
20100051342 | May 2010 | KR |
EA014510 | Dec 2010 | RU |
2008113082 | Sep 2008 | WO |
2010014844 | Jul 2010 | WO |
2011076028 | Jun 2011 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20180183288 A1 | Jun 2018 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 14969677 | Dec 2015 | US |
Child | 15885055 | US | |
Parent | 13652035 | Oct 2012 | US |
Child | 14969677 | US |