The present disclosure is related generally to heat exchangers and more particularly to heat exchanger core designs.
Heat exchangers can provide a compact, low-weight, and highly effective means of exchanging heat from a hot fluid to a cold fluid. Heat exchangers that operate at elevated temperatures, such as those used in modern aircraft engines, often have short service lifetimes due to thermal stresses, which can cause expansion and cracking of the fluid conduits. Thermal stresses can be caused by mismatched temperature distribution, component stiffness, geometry discontinuity, and material properties (e.g., thermal expansion coefficients and modulus), with regions of highest thermal stress generally located at the interface of the heat exchanger inlet/outlet and core.
A need exists for heat exchangers with increased heat transfer, reduced pressure loss and vibration excitation, and improved performance under thermal stresses.
In one aspect, the present disclosure is directed toward a heat exchanger with a tubular inlet, a tubular outlet, and a core. The core fluidically connects the tubular inlet to the tubular outlet via a first plurality of tubes and a second plurality of tubes, all of which have a helical shape. The first plurality of tubes is nested radially outwardly of the second plurality of tubes.
In another aspect, the present disclosure is directed toward a heat exchanger with a first fluid manifold extending along a first fluid axis from a first fluid inlet to a first fluid outlet. The first fluid manifold includes a first fluid inlet header, a first fluid outlet header, and a nested helical core section. The first fluid inlet header is disposed to fork the first fluid inlet into a plurality of first fluid branches distributed circumferentially and radially about the first fluid axis. The first fluid outlet header is disposed to combine the plurality of first fluid branches into the first fluid outlet. The nested helical core section fluidly connects the first fluid inlet header to the first fluid outlet header via a plurality of nested helical tubes, and includes radially inner and outer groups of circumferentially distributed helical tubes.
The present summary is provided only by way of example, and not limitation. Other aspects of the present disclosure will be appreciated in view of the entirety of the present disclosure, including the entire text, claims, and accompanying figures.
While the above-identified figures set forth one or more embodiments of the present disclosure, other embodiments are also contemplated, as noted in the discussion. In all cases, this disclosure presents the invention by way of representation and not limitation. It should be understood that numerous other modifications and embodiments can be devised by those skilled in the art, which fall within the scope and spirit of the principles of the invention. The figures may not be drawn to scale, and applications and embodiments of the present invention may include features and components not specifically shown in the drawings.
A heat exchanger with a rotationally symmetric helical core is presented herein. This helical core is made up of at least two radial groups of structurally independent, circumferentially distributed and nested helical tubes. These tubes can be distributed in a nested spring arrangement. These groups can be internally uniform, but differ from each other in at least some characteristics (e.g. helix angle, tube diameter/area, and/or tube wall thickness). These differences allow heat transfer to be equalized across groups, where differences in group radial location within the heat exchanger would otherwise produce variations in heat transfer efficiency, e.g. due to differences in fluid flow path length or exposure to cooling airflow. The helical geometry of the core additionally increases heat exchanger functional length and surface area as a function of the total axial length of the core, and provides structural compliance that allows the core to serve as a spring to relieve thermal and other stresses from the heat exchanger and adjacent (connecting) flow elements.
During operation of heat exchanger 10, hot fluid flow F1 is provided to inlet header 16, flows through core 20, and exits through outlet header 18. Thermal energy is transferred from hot fluid flow F1 to cooling fluid flow F2 as hot fluid flow F1 passes through core 20. It will be understood by one of ordinary skill in the art that the disclosed independent cold flow structure can be tailored for use with a wide variety of core geometries and is not limited to the embodiments shown. Furthermore, although the present disclosure refers to some flow as “cold” and other as “hot,” the present geometry can more generally be applied to any two fluid flows in a heat exchange relationship, e.g. wherein F1 and F2 are exchanged i.e. as cold and hot flows, respectively.
As illustrated in
Headers 16, 18 distribute and receive fluid, respectively, substantially evenly across core 20. Specifically, inlet header 16 splits into inlet header branches 24, and outlet header 18 recombines from header branches 26. In the illustrated embodiment, header 16 is a successively fractally branching manifold with multiple stages of branches, each narrowing in cross-sectional flow area with respect to the previous stage of less numerous branches, finally terminating in the full count of outlet header branches 22 as the narrowest and most axially distant from inlet passage 22. More specifically, the present figures illustrate each stage of header 16 branching rotationally symmetrically about axis A into an even number of tubes evenly circumferentially distributed across a common plane transverse to axis A. More generally, however, header 16 can be of any shape capable of distributing fluid from a single source at inlet passage 22 across the multitude of separate helical tubes 30 of core 20. The illustrated embodiment, however, advantageously reduces pressure drop and provides additional mechanical compliance along axis A, within header 16.
As depicted in
Second fluid guide 14 is illustrated schematically in
Although
The majority of heat transfer enabled by heat exchanger 10 is accomplished within core section 20. Core section is formed by a plurality of separate, structurally independent helical tubes 30. Each helical tube 30 has a helical or spring-like geometry, extending axially and turning in common about fluid axis A. Helical tubes 30a, 30b are nested circumferentially with respect to other tubes of the same set, and coaxially with respect to the other set. Each helical tube 30a, 30b can be substantially identical to all other tubes 30a, 30b, respectively, but shifted circumferentially relative to adjacent tubes. All tubes 30a, 30b are depicted as cross-sectionally distributed in circular arrays at an outer and inner radius of core 20, respectively, in circular arrays across a plane orthogonal to fluid axis A. More generally, tubes 30 can be distributed in combination of arrays with rotational symmetry about fluid axis A, e.g. in elliptical or cloverleaf patterns. Circular symmetry in the distribution of tubes 30 permits each of tubes 30a, 30b to have identical geometry within their respective groups, with correspondingly identical and therefore uniform fluid flow and heat transfer characteristics. Asymmetric arrangements of tubes 30, however, may be advantageous in tight space constraints, or where cooling fluid flow F2 is non-uniform. The shortest spacing between circumferentially adjacent helical tubes 30a, 30b is primarily circumferential (but partly axial), which provides a substantially uniform gap spacing between all adjacent tubes 30a, 30b, so as to promote even airflow F2 therebetween. Radial separation between groups 30a, 30b can, in some embodiments, at least exceed circumferential spacing between tubes of the same grouping, so as to promote cooling fluid flow F2 between tube groupings. All helical tubes 30a, 30b within a single grouping can have a substantially identical and uniform inner diameter with a circular cross-section, resulting in equal cross-sectional areas. In the illustrated embodiment, the spacing between circumferentially adjacent helical tubes 30 is greater than this inner diameter.
The helical shape of tubes 30 of core 20 serves several functions. First, helical tubes 30 have no sharp corners or interfaces (e.g. with headers 16, 18), and consequently reduce unnecessary pressure losses. Second, helical tubes 30 are compliant along axis A, acting as a spring capable of deforming to accommodation expansion or axial translation of adjacent components. In particular, helical tubes 30 can be capable of compliantly deforming along axis A so as to accommodate thermal growth of headers 16, 18, and/or translation of headers 16, 18 due to thermal growth of adjacent (upstream or downstream) components. This mechanical compliance provided by core 20 allows heat exchanger to better distribute and weather thermal and other mechanical stresses.
In at least some embodiments, helical core 20 is significantly less compliant laterally, i.e. in dimensions transverse to fluid axis A. This increased lateral stiffness provides first fluid manifold 12 with resonant frequencies of oscillation transverse to the first fluid flow that are greater than the range of operating frequencies of a surrounding engine or other components for at least its three highest amplitude natural frequencies, for example, so as to avoid excitation within the expected environment of heat exchanger 10. The generally circular cross-section of each tube 30 contributes to this increased lateral stiffness. Cross-sectional geometry (e.g. elliptical, circular, oblong), wall stiffness, helix angle, to and material can all be varied between radial groupings of tubes 30 to increase consistency of heat exchange or mechanical properties of first fluid manifold 12 across tube groupings. As mentioned previously, adjustments to dimensions, shapes, and/or materials of tubes 30a, 30b can enable substantial uniformity of stiffness between tube groupings 30a and 30b, despite necessary geometric differences due to differences in radial location of the respective groups. The helical geometry of tubes 30 also provides greater fluid flow length within each tube 30, and correspondingly greater surface area exposed to cooling fluid flow F2. The overall passage length of each tube 30 can, for example, be double the axial length of core 30, or more. Helical tubes 30 can introduce additional turbulence to fluid flows F1, F2, for additional heat transfer.
In view of the above, in comparison to conventional straight-line connected channels, core 20 provides heat exchanger 10 with improved axial compliance to handle thermal stresses, increased lateral stiffness to avoid potentially harmful resonance conditions, and increased surface area exposed to cooling fluid flow F2 for greater heat exchange, all with only modest pressure losses from inlet passage 22 to outlet passage 28. Furthermore, the geometry of core 20 is symmetrical along two axes (axial and radial), and can consequently improve the uniformity of stress distribution across first fluid manifold 12. By varying characteristics of helical tubes 30 between radial groupings, the present disclosure enables multiple radial groupings to be used for higher packing density and heat transfer efficiency, without deleterious consequences to heat transfer uniformity, flow rate, pressure losses, or vibrational characteristics of heat exchanger 10.
The following are non-exclusive descriptions of possible embodiments of the present invention.
A heat exchanger apparatus comprising: a tubular inlet; a tubular outlet; and a core fluidically connecting the tubular inlet to the tubular outlet via a first plurality of tubes and a second plurality of tubes all of which have a helical shape, the first plurality of tubes being nested radially outwardly of the second plurality of tubes.
A heat exchanger comprising: a first fluid manifold extending along a first fluid axis from a first fluid inlet to a first fluid outlet, the first fluid manifold comprising: a first fluid inlet header disposed to fork the first fluid inlet into a plurality of first fluid branches distributed circumferentially and radially about the first fluid axis; a first fluid outlet header disposed to combine the plurality of first fluid branches into the first fluid outlet; and a nested helical core section fluidly connecting the first fluid inlet header to the first fluid outlet header via a plurality of nested helical tubes the nested helical core section comprising: a radially inner group of circumferentially distributed helical tubes; and a radially outer group of circumferentially distributed helical tubes, disposed radially outward of the radially inner group of circumferentially distributed helical tubes, with respect to the fluid axis.
The heat exchanger of the preceding paragraph can optionally include, additionally and/or alternatively, any one or more of the following features, configurations and/or additional components:
A further embodiment of the foregoing heat exchanger, wherein each of the plurality of helical tubes is structurally independent from all others of the plurality of helical tubes, such that the plurality of helical tubes are mechanically connected to each other only at the first fluid inlet header and the first fluid outlet header.
A further embodiment of the foregoing heat exchanger, wherein each of the plurality of helical tubes extends axially along and circumferentially about the first fluid axis.
A further embodiment of the foregoing heat exchanger, wherein the first fluid axis extends linearly from the first fluid inlet passage to the first fluid outlet passage, and wherein the first fluid inlet and the first fluid outlet are themselves oriented along the first fluid axis.
A further embodiment of the foregoing heat exchanger, wherein all of the radially inner group of circumferentially distributed helical tubes have first identical geometries, and wherein all of the radially outer group of circumferentially distributed helical tubes have second identical geometries, that differ from the first identical geometries.
A further embodiment of the foregoing heat exchanger, wherein the first and second identical geometries are defined at least in part by helix angle, tube wall thickness, and tube flow diameter, such that all of the helical tubes of the radially inner group of circumferentially distributed helical tubes have identical helix angle, tube wall thickness, and tube flow diameter, all of the helical tubes of the radially outer group of circumferentially distributed helical tubes have identical helix angle, tube wall thickness, and tube flow diameter, and all of the helical tubes of the radially inner group of circumferentially distributed helical tubes differ from all of the helical tubes of the radially outer group of circumferentially distributed helical tubes in at least one of the group consisting of helix angle, tube wall thickness, and tube flow diameter.
A further embodiment of the foregoing heat exchanger, wherein the helix angle all of the helical tubes of the radially inner group of circumferentially distributed helical tubes is greater than the helix angle of all of the helical tubes of the radially outer group of circumferentially distributed helical tubes.
A further embodiment of the foregoing heat exchanger, wherein the tube wall thickness all of the helical tubes of the radially inner group of circumferentially distributed helical tubes is less than the tube wall thickness of all of the helical tubes of the radially outer group of circumferentially distributed helical tubes.
A further embodiment of the foregoing heat exchanger, wherein the flow diameter all of the helical tubes of the radially inner group of circumferentially distributed helical tubes is less than the flow diameter of all of the helical tubes of the radially outer group of circumferentially distributed helical tubes.
A further embodiment of the foregoing heat exchanger, wherein the tubes of the radially outer group of circumferentially distributed helical tubes are more numerous than the tubes of the radially inner group of circumferentially distributed helical tubes.
A further embodiment of the foregoing heat exchanger, wherein each of the plurality of helical tubes is mechanically separated from circumferentially adjacent of the plurality of helical tubes by a circumferential and axial gap.
A further embodiment of the foregoing heat exchanger, wherein each of plurality of helical tubes has a total passage length at least double its extent along the first fluid axis.
A further embodiment of the foregoing heat exchanger, wherein the nested helical core section forms a nested double spring shape extending between the first fluid inlet header and the first fluid outlet header, wherein the nested double spring shape is principally compliant along the first fluid axis.
A further embodiment of the foregoing heat exchanger, further comprising a second fluid flow structure disposed to direct a second fluid to impinge on the first fluid manifold, wherein the second fluid flow structure is configured to direct the second fluid generally along a direction from the first fluid outlet to the first fluid inlet.
A further embodiment of the foregoing heat exchanger, wherein the entirety of the first fluid manifold is formed monolithically as a single structure.
A further embodiment of the foregoing heat exchanger, wherein all of the plurality of helical tubes have substantially identical flow path length.
A further embodiment of the foregoing heat exchanger, wherein all of the plurality of helical tubes have a circular cross-section.
A further embodiment of the foregoing heat exchanger, wherein the first fluid inlet header and the first fluid outlet header are fractally arranged structures with successive forks between less numerous branches with wider flow area and more numerous branches with narrower flow area.
Any relative terms or terms of degree used herein, such as “substantially”, “essentially”, “generally”, “approximately” and the like, should be interpreted in accordance with and subject to any applicable definitions or limits expressly stated herein. In all instances, any relative terms or terms of degree used herein should be interpreted to broadly encompass any relevant disclosed embodiments as well as such ranges or variations as would be understood by a person of ordinary skill in the art in view of the entirety of the present disclosure, such as to encompass ordinary manufacturing tolerance variations, incidental alignment variations, alignment or shape variations induced by thermal, rotational or vibrational operational conditions, and the like.
While the invention has been described with reference to an exemplary embodiment(s), it will be understood by those skilled in the art that various changes may be made and equivalents may be substituted for elements thereof without departing from the scope of the invention. In addition, many modifications may be made to adapt a particular situation or material to the teachings of the invention without departing from the essential scope thereof. Therefore, it is intended that the invention not be limited to the particular embodiment(s) disclosed, but that the invention will include all embodiments falling within the scope of the appended claims.
This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 62/815,838 filed Mar. 8, 2019 for “RADIALLY LAYERED HELICAL CORE GEOMETRY FOR HEAT EXCHANGER” by A. Becene, G. Ruiz, F. Feng, M. Maynard, M. Doe, M. Hu, and E. Joseph.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
485315 | Yaryan | Nov 1892 | A |
1655086 | Blanding | Jan 1928 | A |
1768222 | Uhde | Jun 1930 | A |
2734224 | Wnstead | Feb 1956 | A |
2798361 | Frederick | Jul 1957 | A |
3205939 | Huet | Sep 1965 | A |
3212570 | Holman | Oct 1965 | A |
4058161 | Trepaud | Nov 1977 | A |
4066121 | Kleine | Jan 1978 | A |
4451960 | Molitor | Jun 1984 | A |
4570703 | Ringsmuth et al. | Feb 1986 | A |
5388635 | Gruber | Feb 1995 | A |
6296020 | McNeely et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6679083 | Erickson | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6688381 | Pence | Feb 2004 | B2 |
7021608 | Lavemann | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7240723 | Wu et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
8241239 | Solomon et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8528628 | Robinson | Sep 2013 | B2 |
9134072 | Roisin et al. | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9279621 | Seybold | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9541331 | Nagurny et al. | Jan 2017 | B2 |
9656212 | DiBiasio et al. | May 2017 | B2 |
9964077 | Neal et al. | May 2018 | B2 |
9976815 | Roper et al. | May 2018 | B1 |
10048019 | Karlen et al. | Aug 2018 | B2 |
10088250 | Turney | Oct 2018 | B2 |
10267515 | Adriany et al. | Apr 2019 | B2 |
10684080 | Moore et al. | Jun 2020 | B2 |
11168942 | Becene et al. | Nov 2021 | B2 |
20030039169 | Ehrfeld et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20040195708 | Lavemann et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20080190586 | Robinson | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20090269837 | Shevkoplyas et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090274549 | Mitchell et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090316972 | Borenstein et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100096115 | Erickson | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100297535 | Das et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20120125560 | McKeown et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20130206374 | Roisin et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20140262136 | Jensen | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20150140190 | Cully et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
20160116218 | Shedd et al. | Apr 2016 | A1 |
20170030651 | Rock, Jr. | Feb 2017 | A1 |
20170089643 | Arafat | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170191762 | Duelser et al. | Jul 2017 | A1 |
20170205149 | Herring et al. | Jul 2017 | A1 |
20170248372 | Emo et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170328644 | Takahashi | Nov 2017 | A1 |
20180038654 | Popp et al. | Feb 2018 | A1 |
20180051934 | Wentland et al. | Feb 2018 | A1 |
20180100703 | Beaver et al. | Apr 2018 | A1 |
20180100704 | Lewandowski et al. | Apr 2018 | A1 |
20180106550 | Nelson | Apr 2018 | A1 |
20180266770 | Wagner et al. | Sep 2018 | A1 |
20180283794 | Cerny et al. | Oct 2018 | A1 |
20180283795 | Cerny et al. | Oct 2018 | A1 |
20190024989 | Wilson et al. | Jan 2019 | A1 |
20190086154 | Adriany et al. | Mar 2019 | A1 |
20190366290 | Hofmann et al. | Dec 2019 | A1 |
20200041212 | Palmer et al. | Feb 2020 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
202019102083 | Apr 2019 | DE |
3124906 | Feb 2017 | EP |
0074570 | Dec 2018 | EP |
3410054 | Dec 2018 | EP |
453494 | Jun 1913 | FR |
588520 | May 1947 | GB |
2006322643 | Nov 2006 | JP |
WO2010138061 | Dec 2010 | WO |
WO2017052798 | Mar 2017 | WO |
WO2018154063 | Aug 2018 | WO |
2018191787 | Oct 2018 | WO |
WD2018182808 | Oct 2018 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Extended European Search Report for EP Application No. 19213258.7, dated May 8, 2020, 9 pages. |
Extended European Search Report for EP Application No. 19216146.1, dated Jul. 2, 2020, 8 pages. |
Extended European Search Report for EP Application No. 19216221.2, dated Jul. 28, 2020, 7 pages. |
Extended European Search Report for EP Application No. 19216295.6, dated Jul. 22, 2020, 7 pages. |
L. Luo, et al., “Constructal approach and multi-scale components” from Applied Thermal Engineering 27 (2007) pp. 1708-1714. |
Extended European Search Report for EP Application No. 19215931.7, dated Jul. 28, 2020, 8 pages. |
Communication Pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC for EP Application No. 19216221.2, dated Oct. 27, 2021, 6 pages. |
Extended European Search Report for EP Application No. 21176197.8, dated Nov. 9, 2021, 8 pages. |
L. Luo et al., “Integration of Constructal Distributors to a Mini Crossflow Heat Exchanger and Their Assembly Configuration Optimization”, from Chemical Engineering Science 62, (2007) pp. 3605-3619. |
L. Luo et al., Experimental Study of Constructal Distributor for Flow Equidistribution in a Mini Crossflow Heat Exchanger (MCHE), from Chemical Engineering and Processing 47, (2008) pp. 229-236. |
Z.Fan, et al., “Numerical Investigation of Constructal Distributors with Different Configurations”, from Chinese Journal of Chemical Engineering, 17(1), (2009) pp. 175-178. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20200284517 A1 | Sep 2020 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62815838 | Mar 2019 | US |