1. Field of the Invention
This invention relates generally to portable communication devices such as cell phones, smart phones and similar handheld devices, and improvements thereto. In particular, this invention provides improvements in antennas and RF shielding of such devices, the embedding of an antenna into the removable battery of a portable communication device, or any large surface area inside a phone, facing a direction away from the user, to redirecting RF radiation away from the body of a user, and to several methods of exploiting technical advantages that result from embedding an antenna into the battery.
2. Background
Design requirements of cellular phones and smart phones are placing an ever increasing premium on the available space within these devices as their functions become more diverse, ranging from the original basic function as a wireless telephone to a music player, video player, handheld computer, wireless internet device for browsing the web, retrieving email and downloading or uploading files, a still camera, a video camera, a GPS device, a navigation system, etc. These functions bring with them greatly increased demands upon the antenna and generally requires more radiation power for transmission, which must serve up to five frequency bands while occupying less space than ever before available for the antenna.
In addition, RF radiation from mobile phones is becoming of greater concern as a health risk, and addressing this issue in the design of the antenna while the space within the phone is reduced poses a particularly difficult challenge, as the only effective methods of significantly reducing RF radiation in the direction of the user, while allowing full power RF signal away from the user, require some additional space for the antenna.
The FCC requires limiting the radiation from a portable communication device (such as a mobile or cellular telephone) that is directed towards a user's head (Specific Absorption Rate, or SAR). Each year the FCC tends to lower the permitted level further. One of the reasons is safety. At the same time, as wireless communications technology advances, the mobile phone device has taken on the function of a hand-held computer with more data-intensive functions, requiring high rates of data transfer between the cell phone and the base station tower. It would be beneficial to the improved function of cell phones to be able to increase the power output of the antenna, but FCC regulations will not allow increased SAR.
The Smart Phone (e.g. iPhone, BlackBerry, etc.), for example, has an internal antenna(s) located at both the lower and upper parts of the phone, bordering the display area. The space for an antenna is usually limited to 1 cm times the width and thickness of the phone. The antenna is situated close to the back surface of the phone, on the side opposite to the user.
According to a first embodiment, the present invention dramatically increases the effective space for the antenna and provides highly effective shielding and RF radiation redirection away from the user, while actually increasing the available space within the phone casing. The invention incorporates the antenna into the battery such that the antenna lies on the side of the battery facing away from the user, where the battery is attached to the back of the phone facing away from the user. The battery's electrical connections are increased to include all the needed antenna leads into the phone's circuits. All batteries designed for a particular model of phone would feature the antenna built-in.
One advantage of this design is to afford far more space for the complex antennas of the future, aiding in their optimization. Separate antennas can be employed within the battery, utilizing the relatively larger area available on the battery to provide separation of antennas of different frequencies and functions, thereby reducing interference between the antennas. Another important advantage of this configuration is that it permits optimization of an RF shielding design for wireless phones. The thickness of the battery can serve to provide the needed space between the antenna and a tuned RF shielding element placed within the battery on the side nearest the user, with the lithium ion core or other functional storage medium of the battery lying between the shielding and the antenna. The resulting spacing between the RF shielding and the antenna is optimally one-quarter of the wavelength of the transmission signal. This goal can be aided by the use of a layer of dielectric material between the RF shielding and the antenna, but is still extremely difficult to achieve in the small space allowed inside the phone case. By designing the battery such that the thickness of the battery's storage medium results in the correct spacing for the tuning of the RF shielding, and by grounding the shielding through a connector from the battery to the phone's ground circuit, and by designing the RF shielding itself to optimally redirect the RF radiation away from the user while leaving undiminished the desired signal directed away from the user, a unique benefit of significant reduction in RF absorption by the user's body can be achieved.
An alternate way of redirection is to use two antennas phased appropriately to radiate waves in a direction away from the user. This can be achieved in two ways:
1. Place two antennas one on each side of the battery. Each antenna is connected to the output power. The phase between these antennas is controlled digitally to give the optimum direction outward. Micro-processor with very low power requirement (microwatt) is available for this digital control. The power for such control can be derived from capturing the radiation power from the phone.
2. This configuration is ideal for multiple-band applications. For each frequency used the phase is programmed to give the optimum propagation characteristics. This will make it unnecessary to have a material of high dielectric constant.
The same principle can be used where one antenna is located in the cell phone case and another antenna inside the phone or on/in the battery. In general, two or more antennas are preferred to direct the radiation from a wireless phone.
According to a second aspect of the invention, radiation from a portable communication device is directed away from the user such that there is minimum effect on the performance of the device. The end result is a low SAR and an unchanged TRP (Total Radiation Power). This is accomplished by coupling radiation from the antenna inside a wireless phone to an external case. The external case is provided with a shield comprising a metallic surface that is corrugated. Such a shield may also be installed inside the wireless device.
According to first aspect of the invention as shown in
As shown in
In another embodiment of the invention as shown on
The main feature of this design for a battery case is that the antenna for the wireless device is embedded within the battery rather than inside the wireless device. Various configurations of the antenna within the battery case are possible and obvious to any person of ordinary skill in the art.
In the embodiment of this invention wherein an RF shield is embedded into the battery case, only the side of the battery facing the user contains the shielding while the side away from the user is made from non-conducting or low-conductive materials allowing the EM wave to propagate outward towards the cell phone tower without suffering any attenuation.
Incorporation of this RF shield inside the battery will aid in satisfying the FCC requirement limiting the radiation that is directed towards the user's head (Specific Absorption Rate, or SAR). Over time the FCC may tend to lower the permitted SAR level even further. At the same time, as wireless communications technology advances, the cell phone has taken on the function of a hand-held computer with more data-intensive functions, requiring high rates of data transfer to and from the cell phone tower. While it is beneficial to the improved function of cell phones to increase the power output of the antenna, FCC regulations will not allow such an increase in the SAR if the radiation is isotropic. The device of the present invention wherein the radiation is redirected away from the user and towards the base station fulfills both the requirements of the FCC and the technical communication requirements of ever increasing data rates in mobile entertainment and communication devices.
The advantage of this smart case is to always improve a given cell phone whose function is to transmit and receive signals, while the case can always upgrade the function of a cell phone. One of the most important functions of such a case is to provide a second antenna which if phased properly will provide the redirection feature without the use of a high-dielectric material. In order to make a multiple band antenna directional it is important to use a phased array so that radiation always will be emitted from one side of the phone.
According to a second aspect of the invention, radiation is coupled from the antenna inside a wireless phone to an external case where the distribution of radiation can be better managed. Several arrangements of directing RF radiation away from the user's head by the appropriate placement of metallic loops and other parasitic elements are presented. This can take the form of arrays of dipole antennas, conducting loops and conducting plates with insulators or dielectrics. The general concept is to couple the radiation from the internal antenna on the side facing the user to the opposite side of the device, where there is sufficient space inside an external case to direct such radiation outward and away from the user. The coupling must be designed to direct the radiation without causing a drop in the output of the external amplifier. From an engineering point of view the impedance seen by the output amplifier should not change. From a physicist's point of view there should be minimum radiation power reflected back on the radiating antenna of the cell phone.
In one preferred embodiment of this aspect of the invention, “coupling antennas” are used to direct radiation from the internal antenna of a wireless phone to a large surface of a carrying case such that there is minimum radiation towards the user and maximum radiation away from the user. It is important to note that this coupling method does not require an actual physical connection between the case and the interior of the phone. However the position of the coupling antenna with respect to the internal antenna is critical. Through a series of coupling loops, Yagi antennas or patch antennas, the radiation is further directed away from the user's head which is absorptive and towards his surroundings for communication to cell towers. The materials used for coupling and re-directional elements are generally made out of materials of high electric conductivities, although dielectric materials are also used to achieve optimal physical spacings.
In the preferred embodiment of the invention as shown in
In another embodiment of the invention as shown in
In an alternate embodiment of the invention as shown in
The redirection of RF radiation away from the user's head may also be achieved by the use of a properly located passive beam antenna as shown in
A main feature of this invention, whether as a passive directional beam antenna alone, or in combination with a passive re-directional shield incorporated in an external case for a wireless phone, or such combination incorporated internally in a wireless phone device, is that the invention directs/redirects radiation away from the user and out of the phone towards a cell tower, reducing SAR without adversely affecting TRP. It does this with a combination of a directional antenna and re-directive shield integrated within a case of non-conducting or low-conductive materials (variously of silicon, plastic, cloth, etc.) that allow EM waves to propagate outward towards the cell phone tower without suffering any attenuation.
The same RF redirection would be the result of the material(s), in these various embodiments, being integrated into the internal design of the wireless device, as shown in
The invention may also be embodied in an active case, where the power that drives the external antenna embedded in the external case comes from the cell phone's internal battery via the phone's built in power port. The power can also come from solar cells embedded into the external case. It can also come from mechanical motion of a piezoelectric or other similar mechanical to electrical generator.
The invention includes a directional beam-antenna (Yagi, loop or patch) integrated into the external case on the back side of the phone away from the user, floated within the external case with a general tolerance for placement optimally within +/−0.020″ (+/−0.5 mm). This antenna works as a directional antenna consisting of an array of a dipole and additional closely coupled parasitic elements (a reflector and one or more directors). These elements are made of specific planar metal material (copper or gold, for example). The dipole in the array is placed over the phone's internal antenna, effectively coupled by proximity and within a specific tolerance of placement, but optimally at 5%, and driven by said internal antenna. Another element, 10% longer, operates as a reflector. Other shorter parasitic elements are added in front of the dipole as directors. Elements arranged optimally at approximately a one-quarter-wavelength mutual spacing and being progressively slightly shorter than a half wavelength, optimally positioned within a 10% tolerance, direct signals of increasingly higher frequencies onto the active dipole. The beam-like antenna has directionality, directing radiation away from the reflector through the driven element and out via the directors in the top of the wireless device, producing a chimney effect.
The directional antenna may also be a loop or patch antenna where said antenna is on the back of the phone, away from the user's head, placed optimally 3 mm below the plane containing the iPhone antenna. The loop is offset along the X-axis so that the edge is between the ground sheet and the antenna element. If a patch antenna is used, the patch director is square in shape, and each side is optimal in length. These are free space lengths, corrected for dielectric constant (velocity factor). The patch director functions like the loop director.
The metallic surface is preferably non-planar so that the electromagnetic waves radiated by antennas are reflected into a widely scattered area. The non-planar surface causes reflections of radiation from a single dipole into a much wider area than a planar surface and a single dipole. The metallic surface may be corrugated, curved, or may be folded.
This highly conductive metal imbedded in the external case to reflect the radiation should be corrugated in a specific way (e.g. rows, chevrons, pyramids), to a specific height and width of corrugation. It should be of a specific thickness; optimally, greater than the skin depth of the EM wave at the cell phone frequency. The metal shield may also be flat. The placement on the face of the wireless phone with respect to the internal antenna(s) is specific.
Another condition for efficiency is that the separation between the metal layer and the enclosed antenna should be occupied by a broadband resonant absorptive material having a specific frequency range that is loaded for predetermined loss tangents and that functions on an impedance matching principle. The material is placed over specific areas to limit radiation to the user. However the case is able to redirect radiation effectively, if not optimally, even when the conditions above are not met.
Although the foregoing features described above deal with antennae located in the lower part of the phone, it will be apparent that the same concept can be applied to antennas located in the upper part or other areas of the phone.
A simplification of applying the radiation redirection and shielding can be by use of adhesive patches applied directly onto the area over the antenna; a first patch over the antenna on the side opposite the user (i.e. toward the cell tower) and a second patch between the antenna and the user. In this embodiment the beam antenna, the highly conducting corrugated shield and, optionally the frequency-targeted resonant absorptive layer, can be sandwiched between two non-conducting layers, one of which contains an adhesive surface to be applied directly onto the phone. The user will receive the protection whether the case is applied over it or not. It is apparent that this simplification can be applied to any case and to any phone. Appropriate covering might be necessary to secure this patch in place for more permanent application.
Incorporation of the Shield During Manufacturing
Instead of a case described above, a passive coupling and redirection unit can be installed inside a wireless device, provided the appropriate spacing is used between this coupling unit and the original cell phone antenna. This is made possible by the fact that both the coupling loop and the Yagi directors can all be lined up in a plane with a thickness of 1-2 mm.
Instead of using a case featuring the above described shield can be built into the wireless device; either the beam antenna, alone, or in combination with the corrugated metallic shield, or in combination with the absorptive frequency targeted, can be incorporated directly within the phone's structure. The plastic/metal housing of the phone facing the user will have a liner with a conducting metal layer and, optionally, an absorptive layer, separating the beam antenna, the metal layer and the internal antenna. This has the advantage that the phone is complete with the shield right from the factory.
Another effective method has emerged that is a hybrid approach, combining the passive redirection with the active driver amplifier and battery in the external case. This method uses the cell phone antenna and power amplifier system as a wireless feed to the amplifier/antenna system inside the external case. The final transmission power is to be radiated from an antenna inside the external case. Therefore, the cell phone system serves only as the low power driver, which couples to the final power amplifier (PA) for final transmission to cell stations. Since the antenna in the case can be a patch antenna with a ground plane occupying a space greater than the radiating antenna, we should expect the radiation pattern to be that of a patch antenna. The radiation pattern is hemispherical and will satisfy our goals of achieving a high directional TRP and at the same time low SAR.
As the base station tower receives a strong signal from the external case antenna, it signals the cell phone to lower its power. The cell phone antenna now radiates only a small amount of energy since it acts only as a low-power drive to the external case system, which is performing all the real transmission work. As the cell phone lowers its power, its radiation towards the user will be correspondingly lower even if a shield is not present. When a shield is included on the user side the radiation towards the user will be further reduced. In fact, the effect of the passive shield of suppressing the TRP of the cell phone's antenna is now an advantage to us, as it will allow the Pong antenna to be the dominant antenna. The efficiency of the cell phone's antenna is no longer critical, as it only needs to communicate with the external case's coupling antenna located a few millimeters away.
This design is, in principle, simple. It substitutes the antenna and PA in the external case for the original cell phone antenna. The external case antenna is directional while the cell phone antenna is isotropic or omni-directional. There is more space in the external case for antenna and RF amplifiers with additional power supplies. Once the cell tower receives the necessary power Pt from the cell phone configuration with the radiating case, it will automatically command the cell phone to emit at a lower level Pi=Pt/A , where A is the gain of the RF amplifier in the case.
Referring to
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/491,747, entitled “RADIATION REDIRECTING EXTERNAL CASE FOR PORTABLE COMMUNICATION DEVICE AND ANTENNA EMBEDDED IN BATTERY OF PORTABLE COMMUNICATION DEVICE,” filed on Jun. 8, 2012 (now U.S. Pat. No. 8,442,602), which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/614,132, filed on Nov. 6, 2009 (now U.S. Pat. No. 8,208,980), which claims priority to and the benefit of Provisional Application Ser. No. 61/112,141 filed Nov. 6, 2008, and Provisional Application Ser. No. 61/158,551 filed Mar. 9, 2009, all of which are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5278571 | Helfrick | Jan 1994 | A |
5338896 | Danforth | Aug 1994 | A |
5550552 | Oxley | Aug 1996 | A |
5711014 | Crowley et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5726383 | Geller et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5777261 | Katz | Jul 1998 | A |
5787340 | Sepponen | Jul 1998 | A |
6031495 | Simmons et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6082535 | Mitchell | Jul 2000 | A |
6249256 | Luxon et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6341217 | Wong | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6359213 | Long | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6492957 | Carillo, Jr. et al. | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6515223 | Tashjian | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6568576 | Godshaw et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6576832 | Svarfvar et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6603981 | Carillo, Jr. et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6615026 | Wong | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6711387 | Lungley | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6768523 | Cheng et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6855883 | Matsui | Feb 2005 | B1 |
6856819 | Ito | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6871079 | Choi et al. | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6880737 | Bauer | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6924770 | Carpenter et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6947000 | Ito | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6950674 | Jarrett | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6980777 | Shepherd et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
6985110 | Tanaka et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7031762 | Shoji et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7065379 | Kim et al. | Jun 2006 | B1 |
7164933 | Steigerwald et al. | Jan 2007 | B1 |
7202825 | Leizerovich et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7206618 | Latto et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7230574 | Johnson | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7327841 | Schreiber et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7494069 | Shimada | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7812770 | Qi et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
8068061 | Qi et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8208980 | Wong et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8214003 | Wong et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
20020009976 | Rashidi | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020074142 | Katz | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020183013 | Auckland et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020193136 | Halkosaari et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030078037 | Auckland et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20040014506 | Kemppinen | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20050079820 | Yamashita | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050104782 | Peled et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050195119 | Gaucher et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20060019696 | Brunel et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060022889 | Chiang et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060232483 | Iwai et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060290575 | Pelzer | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070004456 | Shimada | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070241977 | Vance | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20080165064 | Hill et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20090124215 | Nysen | May 2009 | A1 |
20090156151 | Anguera et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090318094 | Pros et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100113111 | Wong et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100214180 | Krogerus | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100216520 | Lee | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100234081 | Wong et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100291965 | Tabe | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20110012794 | Schlub | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110036912 | Guo et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110109515 | Rao | May 2011 | A1 |
20110140982 | Ozden et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20120044115 | McCaughey et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120242549 | Wong et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120309472 | Wong et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130109435 | McCaughey et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130252677 | Wong et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1918745 | Feb 2007 | CN |
1 292 042 | Mar 2003 | EP |
1 835 562 | Sep 2007 | EP |
1 942 580 | Jul 2008 | EP |
WO 00013330 | Mar 2000 | WO |
WO 0135487 | May 2001 | WO |
WO 02095867 | Nov 2002 | WO |
WO 03028424 | Apr 2003 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Second Office Action for Chinese Application No. 200910221262.X, issued Nov. 22, 2013. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/071,197, filed Nov. 4, 2013. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/614,132, mailed Oct. 20, 2011. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/614,132, mailed Mar. 1, 2012. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/724,290, mailed Nov. 9, 2011. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/491,747, mailed Sep. 7, 2012. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2009/063618, mailed Mar. 1, 2010. |
Patent Examination Report No. 1 for Australian Application No. 2009313338, mailed Mar. 6, 2013. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2012/062995, mailed Mar. 8, 2013. |
First Office Action for Chinese Application No. 200910221262.X, issued May 3, 2013. |
Third Office Action for Chinese Application No. 200910221262.X, mailed Mar. 27, 2014. |
Patent Examination Report No. 2 for Australian Application No. 2009313338, mailed Mar. 11, 2014. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20130252677 A1 | Sep 2013 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61112141 | Nov 2008 | US | |
61158551 | Mar 2009 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13491747 | Jun 2012 | US |
Child | 13894039 | US | |
Parent | 12614132 | Nov 2009 | US |
Child | 13491747 | US |