In traditional radiation therapy, a patient lies atop a static treatment couch, and is treated by a static treatment gantry. Often, static blocks are inserted into a beam of radiation to shape the beam. As radiation therapy has advanced, motion has been introduced to improve the quality of treatment and deliver treatments more efficiently.
One method in the field of radiation therapy entails simultaneous motion of multi-leaf collimator (“MLC”) leaves while the patient couch and the gantry, holding the radiation source, remain still. This is referred to as dynamic MLC or a sliding-window technique and can improve delivery efficiency of a series of fixed MLC patterns. Another method is to rotate the gantry in arcs concurrently with MLC motion. This is referred to as intensity modulated arc therapy (“IMAT”). Axial radiation therapy combines MLC motion with gantry rotation and couch movement between rotations. A more advanced version, known as helical radiation therapy, entails simultaneous couch motion concurrently with MLC motion and gantry rotation. The combination of gantry rotation and patient translation results in the radiation source following a helical trajectory about the patient.
In one embodiment, the invention provides methods of performing both patient imaging and radiation therapy treatment through new and advanced motion trajectories of the radiation therapy components. These methods include novel ways of delivering treatment and producing imaging using simultaneous couch, MLC motion, and gantry rotation.
One embodiment of the invention includes a method of delivering a radiation therapy treatment plan to a patient using a radiation therapy system including a moveable support for supporting a patient and a non-ring-shaped gantry moveable relative to the support and supporting a radiation source and a multi-leaf collimator for modulating the radiation during delivery of the treatment plan. The method includes the acts of moving the support along an axis during delivery of the treatment plan, and maintaining the non-ring-shaped gantry at a fixed angle relative to the support during delivery of the treatment plan.
In another embodiment, the invention includes a method of delivering a radiation therapy treatment plan to a patient using a radiation therapy system including a moveable support for supporting a patient and a non-ring-shaped gantry moveable relative to the support and supporting a radiation source and a multi-leaf collimator for modulating the radiation during delivery of the treatment plan. The method includes the acts of moving the support along an axis during delivery of the treatment plan, and moving the non-ring-shaped gantry relative to the support during delivery of the treatment plan.
In another embodiment, the invention includes a method of delivering a radiation therapy treatment plan to a patient using a radiation therapy system including a radiation source and a moveable support for supporting a patient. The method includes the acts of moving the support along an axis, moving the radiation source in a non-circular path relative to the support, and dynamically changing one of a speed and a direction of one of the support and the radiation source during delivery of the treatment plan.
In yet another embodiment, the invention includes a method of delivering a radiation therapy treatment plan to a patient using a radiation therapy system including a radiation source and a moveable support for supporting a patient. The method includes the acts of moving the support along an axis during delivery of the treatment plan, and maintaining the radiation source at a fixed angle relative to the support during delivery of the treatment plan.
In another embodiment, the invention includes a method of delivering a radiation therapy treatment plan to a patient using a radiation therapy system including a moveable support for supporting a patient and a non-ring-shaped gantry moveable relative to the support and supporting a radiation source and a multi-leaf collimator for modulating the radiation during delivery of the treatment plan. The method includes the acts of moving the support along an axis during delivery of the treatment plan, moving the non-ring-shaped gantry relative to the support during delivery of the treatment plan, and acquiring image data of at least a portion of the patient with a radiation beam having a cone-beam geometry.
Other aspects of the invention will become apparent by consideration of the detailed description and accompanying drawings.
Before any embodiments of the invention are explained in detail, it is to be understood that the invention is not limited in its application to the details of construction and the arrangement of components set forth in the following description or illustrated in the following drawings. The invention is capable of other embodiments and of being practiced or of being carried out in various ways. Also, it is to be understood that the phraseology and terminology used herein is for the purpose of description and should not be regarded as limiting. The use of “including,” “comprising,” or “having” and variations thereof herein is meant to encompass the items listed thereafter and equivalents thereof as well as additional items. Unless specified or limited otherwise, the terms “mounted,” “connected,” “supported,” and “coupled” and variations thereof are used broadly and encompass both direct and indirect mountings, connections, supports, and couplings. Further, “connected” and “coupled” are not restricted to physical or mechanical connections or couplings.
Although directional references, such as upper, lower, downward, upward, rearward, bottom, front, rear, etc., may be made herein in describing the drawings, these references are made relative to the drawings (as normally viewed) for convenience. These directions are not intended to be taken literally or limit the present invention in any form. In addition, terms such as “first”, “second”, and “third” are used herein for purposes of description and are not intended to indicate or imply relative importance or significance.
In addition, it should be understood that embodiments of the invention include both hardware, software, and electronic components or modules that, for purposes of discussion, may be illustrated and described as if the majority of the components were implemented solely in hardware. However, one of ordinary skill in the art, and based on a reading of this detailed description, would recognize that, in at least one embodiment, the electronic based aspects of the invention may be implemented in software. As such, it should be noted that a plurality of hardware and software based devices, as well as a plurality of different structural components may be utilized to implement the invention. Furthermore, and as described in subsequent paragraphs, the specific mechanical configurations illustrated in the drawings are intended to exemplify embodiments of the invention and that other alternative mechanical configurations are possible.
The radiation module 22 can also include a modulation device 34 operable to modify or modulate the radiation beam 30. The modulation device 34 provides the modulation of the radiation beam 30 and directs the radiation beam 30 toward the patient 14. Specifically, the radiation beam 34 is directed toward a portion of the patient. Broadly speaking, the portion may include the entire body, but is generally smaller than the entire body and can be defined by a two-dimensional area and/or a three-dimensional volume. A portion desired to receive the radiation, which may be referred to as a target 38 or target region, is an example of a region of interest. Another type of region of interest is a region at risk. If a portion includes a region at risk, the radiation beam is preferably diverted from the region at risk. The patient 14 may have more than one target region that needs to receive radiation therapy. Such modulation is sometimes referred to as intensity modulated radiation therapy (“IMRT”).
The modulation device 34 can include a collimation device 42 as illustrated in
In one embodiment, and illustrated in
The radiation therapy treatment system 10 can also include a detector 78, e.g., a kilovoltage or a megavoltage detector, operable to receive the radiation beam 30. The linear accelerator 26 and the detector 78 can also operate as a computed tomography (CT) system to generate CT images of the patient 14. The linear accelerator 26 emits the radiation beam 30 toward the target 38 in the patient 14. The target 38 absorbs some of the radiation. The detector 78 detects or measures the amount of radiation absorbed by the target 38. The detector 78 collects the absorption data from different angles as the linear accelerator 26 rotates around and emits radiation toward the patient 14. The collected absorption data is transmitted to the computer 74 to process the absorption data and to generate images of the patient's body tissues and organs. The images can also illustrate bone, soft tissues, and blood vessels.
The CT images can be acquired with a radiation beam 30 that has a fan-shaped geometry, a multi-slice geometry or a cone-beam geometry. In addition, the CT images can be acquired with the linear accelerator 26 delivering megavoltage energies or kilovoltage energies. It is also noted that the acquired CT images can be registered with previously acquired CT images (from the radiation therapy treatment system 10 or other image acquisition devices, such as other CT scanners, MRI systems, and PET systems). For example, the previously acquired CT images for the patient 14 can include identified targets 38 made through a contouring process. The newly acquired CT images for the patient 14 can be registered with the previously acquired CT images to assist in identifying the targets 38 in the new CT images. The registration process can use rigid or deformable registration tools.
In some embodiments, the radiation therapy treatment system 10 can include an x-ray source and a CT image detector. The x-ray source and the CT image detector operate in a similar manner as the linear accelerator 26 and the detector 78 as described above to acquire image data. The image data is transmitted to the computer 74 where it is processed to generate images of the patient's body tissues and organs.
The radiation therapy treatment system 10 can also include a patient support, such as a couch 82 (illustrated in
The computer 74, illustrated in
The computer 74 can be networked with other computers 74 and radiation therapy treatment systems 10. The other computers 74 may include additional and/or different computer programs and software and are not required to be identical to the computer 74, described herein. The computers 74 and radiation therapy treatment system 10 can communicate with a network 94. The computers 74 and radiation therapy treatment systems 10 can also communicate with a database(s) 98 and a server(s) 102. It is noted that the software program(s) 90 could also reside on the server(s) 102.
The network 94 can be built according to any networking technology or topology or combinations of technologies and topologies and can include multiple sub-networks. Connections between the computers and systems shown in
Communication between the computers and systems shown in
The two-way arrows in
The software program 90 includes a treatment plan module 106 operable to generate a treatment plan for the patient 14 based on data input to the system 10 by medical personnel. The data includes one or more images (e.g., planning images and/or pre-treatment images) of at least a portion of the patient 14. The treatment plan module 106 separates the treatment into a plurality of fractions and determines the radiation dose for each fraction or treatment based on the prescription input by medical personnel. The treatment plan module 106 also determines the radiation dose for the target 38 based on various contours drawn around the target 38. Multiple targets 38 may be present and included in the same treatment plan.
The software program 90 also includes a patient positioning module 110 operable to position and align the patient 14 with respect to the isocenter of the gantry 18 or other reference for a particular treatment fraction. While the patient 14 is on the couch 82, the patient positioning module 110 acquires an image of the patient 14 and compares the current position of the patient 14 to the position of the patient in a planning or previously acquired image. If the patient's position needs to be adjusted, the patient positioning module 110 provides instructions to the drive system 86 to move the couch 82, or the patient 14 can be manually moved to a new position.
In one aspect, the patient positioning module 110 can receive data from lasers positioned in the treatment room to provide patient position data with respect to the isocenter of the gantry 18 or other reference. Based on the data from the lasers, the patient positioning module 110 provides instructions to the drive system 86, which moves the couch 82 to achieve proper alignment of the patient 14 with respect to the gantry 18 or other reference. It is noted that devices and systems, other than lasers, can be used to provide data to the patient positioning module 110 to assist in the alignment process.
The software program 90 also includes an image module 114 operable to acquire images of at least a portion of the patient 14. The image module 114 can instruct the on-board image device, such as a CT imaging device to acquire images of the patient 14 before treatment commences, during treatment, and after treatment according to desired protocols. In one aspect, the image module 114 acquires an image of the patient 14 while the patient 14 is substantially in a treatment position. Other imaging devices may be used to acquire pre-treatment images of the patient 14, such as non-quantitative CT, MRI, PET, SPECT, ultrasound, transmission imaging, fluoroscopy, RF-based localization, and the like. The acquired images can be used for registration of the patient 14.
The software program 90 can include a treatment optimization module 118 operable to optimize the treatment plan generated by the treatment plan module 106. In particular, the optimization module 118 generates the commands or instructions for the radiation therapy treatment system 10 necessary to optimally deliver the treatment plan. The optimization module 118 is operable to determine and select between various parameters of operation of the radiation therapy treatment system 10 based on the type of treatment the patient 14 is going to receive and/or the mode of operation of the radiation therapy treatment system 10. Some of the parameters include, but are not limited to, position of the leaves 66, gantry angles and angular speed, speed of the drive system 86, type of motion of the couch 82, size of the jaw aperture 50, couch range of motion, and radiation beam intensity.
The optimization module 118 allows a technician or health care professional to select a mode of operation for the radiation therapy treatment system 10 and related devices assisting in radiation therapy. The modes of operation can include a manual mode, a semi-automatic mode, an automatic mode, or a combination of these modes. Alternatively, the software program 90 and/or the optimization module 118 can include sub-modules operable to selectively adjust parameters of the radiation therapy treatment system 10 pertaining to specific stages of radiation treatment.
The optimization module 118 communicates with the treatment plan module 106 to determine the settings for the radiation therapy treatment system 10 based on the type of treatment that is to be delivered as set forth in the treatment plan. In one type of treatment plan delivery, the radiation therapy treatment system 10 can be configured to position the patient 14 on the couch 82 and deliver radiation to the patient 14 by moving the couch 82, at least partially, through the gantry opening at least on one occasion while the gantry 18 is maintained at a set position or angle. This is sometimes referred to as topotherapy. It is noted that the entire length of the patient 14 does not need to pass through the gantry opening, but rather, any portion of the patient can pass or lie within the gantry opening. It is also noted that the couch 82 can move in a step-wise fashion, in a constant linear motion, and/or a combination of both types of motion. In this aspect, the desired gantry angle(s) can be selected for one or more, at least partial, passes of the patient 14 through the gantry opening. The health care professional can also specify other parameters of the radiation therapy treatment system 10. In some aspects, the optimization module 118 can automatically set the parameters of the radiation treatment therapy system 10 for each pass of the patient 14 through the gantry 18 opening. The parameters automatically set by the optimization module 118 can include, but are not limited to, number of passes of the patient 14 through the gantry 18 opening, gantry angle(s), speed of the drive system, couch range of motion, size of the jaw aperture 45, and radiation beam intensity.
The optimization module 118 can also provide instructions to the image module 114 to perform topographic and/or tomographic imaging of the patient 14 using the radiation therapy treatment system 10. The optimization module 118 can select various settings for topographic and/or tomographic imaging including the number of passes that the patient 14 travels through the gantry opening, gantry angles, speed of the drive system 86, couch range of motion, size of the jaws aperture 50, and radiation beam intensity.
The optimization module 118 can include a scan-plan-treat mode. The scan-plan-treat mode includes a sequence of scanning the patient 14, generating a treatment plan, and treating the patient 14 in one session using the radiation therapy treatment system 10 without interruption. The radiation therapy treatment system 10 integrates positioning of the patient 14, treatment planning, and delivery of the plan in a single system. There is less need to transport the patient 14 to numerous departments in a medical facility for radiation therapy. As a result of the system integration and use of geometric shapes to identify contours in some circumstances, a patient 14 can be treated in approximately 20 minutes or less. For example, it should take about two minutes to position the patient 14 on the couch 82, about three to about six minutes to acquire the CT images, about three minutes to identify the contours, about two minutes to generate the treatment plan, and about three minutes to deliver the plan.
In some aspects, the optimization module 118 provides optimization methods for one or more topographic passes. These can be manually implemented by the user, or automatically implemented by the system 10. These methods include identifying and/or optimizing preferred gantry angles, pitches, gantry speeds, jaw aperture, couch speed, and/or couch range of motion.
Another embodiment of the invention includes extending the target 38 to include a wider area. This process is sometimes referred to as leaf flashing and involves increasing the area of the radiation beam 30 in response to motion of the patient 14 during treatment. For example, some organs of the patient 14 may expand and contract as the patient 14 receives radiation therapy treatment. The leaf flashing process can utilize pre-treatment and/or during-treatment images to determine the additional margin(s) around the target 38 that may need treatment. For example, a pre-determined target 38 located at the breast area of a patient 14 can be treated with the leaf flashing procedure. The breast area can contract and expand as the patient 14 breathes. The leaf flashing procedure allows a health care professional to observe changes of the breast area in the form of images and to adjust the radiation treatment to cover the margin(s) of the target 38 during at least a fraction of the overall treatment. Alternatively, the optimization module 118 can include instructions for the radiation therapy treatment system 10 to automatically perform the leaf flashing procedure by obtaining images and adjusting the treatment based on the images and expected changes in the anatomy of the patient 14. The computer 74 running the optimization module 118 may also perform topotherapy treatment and tomographic imaging automatically or under the supervision of a qualified user.
In another type of treatment plan delivery, the radiation therapy treatment system 10 can be configured to position the patient 14 on the couch 82 and deliver radiation to the patient 14 by moving the couch 82, at least partially, through the gantry opening at least on one occasion while the gantry 18 is rotated along a defined path. The defined path of gantry rotation is in a short arc or between a first position and a second position, where the second position is different than the first position. The defined path is less than a complete circle. This type of gantry movement combined with movement of the couch 82 is sometimes referred to as dynamic tangent.
The patient 14 undergoes an imaging procedure to obtain images that assist in identifying the target(s) 38. Based on the image(s) and/or treatment plan, the optimization module 118 can identify a start angle and an end angle for the defined path of travel of the gantry 18. The optimization module 118 can determine other parameters of the radiation therapy treatment system 10 such as range of motion of the couch 82, helix spacing, size of the jaw aperture 50, and speed of the drive system 86. The optimization module 118 provides instructions to the radiation therapy treatment system 10 to rotate the gantry 18 from the first or start position to the second or end position and to project the radiation beam 30 toward the target 38 while the couch 82 moves the patient 14 into and through the gantry opening.
The dynamic tangent procedure can also be performed as the patient 14 is moved out of the gantry opening. For example, as the patient 14 is moving through and out of the gantry opening the gantry 18 can rotate from the second or end position to the first or start position. A health care professional can view and adjust the operational parameters such as start position, end position, speed of the drive system 86, and couch range of motion for each pass through the gantry opening.
The radiation therapy treatment system 10 can deliver the treatment plan using helices of either common or opposite chirality (i.e., the direction of rotation of the helix relative to its axis), or multiples of both. Opposite chirality is achieved by reversing either the direction of movement of the couch or direction of gantry rotation for a delivery pass after a previous delivery pass.
In various aspects of the invention, treatment options can include changing gantry speeds and/or directions during imaging or treatment; changing couch speeds and/or directions during treatment; completing entire treatment passes before switching direction of the gantry; changing direction of the gantry to deliver higher or lower doses of radiation to the patient; changing direction of the gantry to correct for errors or patient motion; and/or using predictive gating to anticipate errors or patient motion and compensate for any lags in the detection/correction process. Additionally, any of the aforementioned embodiments of the dynamic tangent technique can be combined with simultaneous discrete or continuous motion of the couch 82, or of the patient using an external device. Such motion can be either discrete or continuous, and may be performed at a constant or variable rate with any combinations of translations or rotations comprising the movement.
Further embodiments include optimization of delivery through automatic detection and/or clinical observation of the patient's breathing patterns. This can include manually setting the breathing pauses, or automatically gating the linear accelerator or MLC based upon a patient movement device. In the event that the patient's breathing hinders delivery of the treatment plan, e.g., the patient's breathing becomes erratic, the procedure could continue without radiation (beam off or leaves closed) until the patient's breathing stabilizes. In this event, the system 10 can record the missed regions of the treatment. The missed regions can be cumulated into make-up procedures and run as appropriate (daily, weekly, monthly, etc.) depending on amount of radiation missed and clinical necessity.
The dynamic tangent treatment can also be combined with tomographic or topographic imaging, in which an image(s) is obtained as the patient 14 receives radiation therapy treatment. Images can be acquired by stopping or slowing the dynamic tangent procedure and employing the radiation source 24 to acquire the image or images. Once images are acquired, the dynamic tangent procedure may continue. Some alternatives include acquiring images when the gantry 18 is at the first position. Other alternatives are to acquire images at angles between the first or start position and the second or end position of the gantry 18. Based on the images obtained during treatment, a health care professional may selectively adjust the parameters of the radiation therapy treatment system 10 for subsequent passes of the patient 14, or these parameters may be adjusted automatically. Alternatively, the optimization module 118 can include instructions to automatically set dynamic tangent parameters such as the first or start position, second or end position, gantry speed, couch range of motion, speed of the drive system 86, size of the jaw aperture 50, and the position of the leaves 66.
In another type of treatment plan delivery, a back-and-forth gantry motion is combined with movement of the couch 82. In this type of treatment plan delivery, the radiation therapy treatment system 10 can be configured to position the patient 14 on the couch 82 and deliver radiation to the patient 14 by moving the couch 82, at least partially, through the gantry opening at least on one occasion while the gantry 18 rotates along a defined path in a back-and-forth motion. The defined path of gantry rotation is in a short arc or between a first position and a second position, where the second position is different than the first position. The defined path is less than a complete circle. This is sometimes referred to as rocking gantry.
The patient 14 undergoes an imaging procedure to obtain images that assist in identifying the target(s) 38. Based on the image(s) and/or treatment plan, the optimization module 118 can identify a start angle and an end angle for the defined path of travel of the gantry 18. The optimization module 118 can determine other parameters of the radiation therapy treatment system 10 such as range of motion of the couch 82, helix spacing, size of the jaw aperture 50, and speed of the drive system 86. The optimization module 118 provides instructions to the radiation therapy treatment system 10 to rotate the gantry 18 in a back-and-forth manner along the path between the first or start position to the second or end position and to project the radiation beam 30 toward the target 38 while the couch 82 moves the patient 14 into and through the gantry opening.
The rocking gantry method of treatment may also include tomographic or topographic imaging of the patient 14 in which an image(s) is obtained as the patient 14 receives radiation treatment. Images can be acquired by selectively stopping the gantry 18 at an angle between the start position and the end position, obtaining an image or images, and resuming treatment. Based on the images obtained during treatment, a health care professional can adjust the parameters of the radiation therapy treatment system 10 for subsequent passes of the patient 14.
The rocking gantry procedure can also be performed as the patient 14 is moved out of the gantry opening. For example, as the patient 14 is moving through and out of the gantry opening the gantry 18 can rotate in a back-and-forth manner from the second or end position to the first or start position. A health care professional can view and adjust the operational parameters such as start position, end position, speed of the drive system 86, and couch range of motion for each pass through the gantry opening.
Another aspect of the invention includes adjusting the radiation therapy treatment system parameters to provide therapy to the patient 14 with a plurality of identified targets 38. This is referred to as multiple region treatment and involves providing radiation treatment to a first target 38 and automatically proceeding to provide treatment to a subsequent target 38. This can provide efficient and automatic treatment to disparate targets 38. Targets 38 may require different types of treatments such as rocking gantry or dynamic tangent. The multiple region treatment procedure can incorporate various types of treatments by automatically adjusting parameters such as the size of the jaw aperture 50, position of the leaves 66, speed of the drive system 86, and couch range of motion, for each target 38 to be treated. In one pass of the patient 14 through the gantry opening, the multiple region treatment procedure can automatically adjust the position of the patient 14 between treatment sequences.
Topographic imaging may also be incorporated with the multiple region treatment procedure. Similar to other treatment procedures, CT images can be selectively acquired by stopping or slowing the radiation therapy treatment system 10 at a desired location, acquiring one or more CT images and subsequently continuing treatment. Based on the CT images obtained during treatment, a health care professional can selectively adjust treatment for each target 38 being treated. Alternatively, the optimization module 118 can include instructions to automatically determine the number of targets 38 to be treated, adjust the radiation therapy treatment system parameters for each treatment according to the characteristics of the targets 38, and reposition the patient 14 between treatments.
Another aspect of the invention includes concurrent cone beam CT (“CBCT”) imaging for radiation treatments with couch motion. This process can be combined with movement of the gantry 18. This combination is referred to as helical trajectory CBCT because the radiation source 24 follows a helical path around the patient 14 as the patient 14 is moved into the gantry opening at a constant speed. Another aspect is concurrent couch motion with a static gantry 18. The radiation source 24 for CBCT imaging maintains a constant position as the patient 14 is moved by the couch 82 under the influence of the drive system 86 at a constant speed. Another aspect is concurrent couch motion with gantry rotation between a start angle and an end angle for CBCT imaging. CBCT images can be obtained while the gantry 18 rotates from the start angle to the end angle and the patient 14 is moved through the gantry opening by the couch 82. The gantry 18 can also rotate in a back-and-forth motion between the start angle and end angles as the patient 14 is moved by couch 82.
Another aspect of the invention is concurrent motion of the couch 82 with other imaging systems such as, but not limited to, PET, SPECT or MRI. Alternatively, the optimization module 118 can automatically select the operational parameters of the radiation therapy treatment system 10 for concurrent CBCT imaging, or other imaging procedures, and couch 82 motion under predetermined conditions can be selected by a health care professional.
Another aspect of the invention includes adjusting the parameters of the radiation therapy treatment system 10 to generate CT images of a plurality of the targets 38. In particular, a health care professional may adjust the parameters of the radiation therapy treatment to acquire CT images at an target 38 and proceed to a subsequent target 38 during one pass of the patient 14 through the gantry opening. Transporting the patient 14 to acquire CT images from one region to the subsequent region may require adjusting the radiation therapy treatment system parameters such as speed of the drive system 86, range of motion of the couch 82, and gantry angle. Alternatively, the optimization module 118 can automatically set the appropriate parameters for obtaining CT images in a region of interest, repositioning the patient 14, and setting appropriate parameters for CT imaging in subsequent region or regions.
The software program 90 also includes a treatment delivery module 122 operable to instruct the radiation therapy treatment system 10 to deliver the treatment plan to the patient 14 according to the treatment plan. The treatment delivery module 122 calculates the appropriate pattern, position, and intensity of the radiation beam 30 to be delivered, to match the prescription as specified by the treatment plan. The pattern of the radiation beam 30 is generated by the modulation device 34, and more particularly by movement of the plurality of leaves in the multi-leaf collimator. The treatment delivery module 122 can utilize canonical, predetermined or template leaf patterns to generate the appropriate pattern for the radiation beam 30 based on the treatment parameters. The treatment delivery module 122 can also include a library of patterns for typical cases that can be accessed in which to compare the present patient data to determine the pattern for the radiation beam 30.
During treatment, the drive system 86 moves (at 282) the patient 14 via the couch 82 in a first direction through the gantry opening while the gantry 18 remains in a fixed position and while the radiation source 24 delivers the radiation beam 30 to the target 38. The optimization module 118 instructs (at 286) the system 10 to set the next position or angle of the gantry 18. The range of motion of the couch 82 and the speed of the drive system 86 may also be updated or modified for the second pass through the gantry opening. Steps 278, 282, and 286 can be repeated as determined by the treatment plan. The radiation therapy treatment system 10 can store the treatment specifications, such as amount of radiation delivered to the patient 14, range of motion of the couch 82, gantry angles employed during the treatment session, and MLC parameters. The information recorded at the end of the treatment can be used to set the parameters for subsequent treatment fractions.
During treatment, the drive system 86 moves (at 332) the patient 14 via the couch 82 through the gantry opening while the gantry 18 remains in a fixed position and while the radiation source 24 delivers the radiation beam 30 to the target 38. During treatment, and either while the couch 82 is slowed or stopped, the optimization module 118 instructs (at 336) the image module 114 to acquire an image(s) of at least a portion of the patient 14. As the patient 14 receives radiation treatment, the target 38 may change due to bodily functions of the patient 14, such as breathing. The image module 114 communicates (at 340) the acquired image data to the optimization module 118. The optimization module 118 instructs (at 344) the radiation module 22 to modify the radiation beam 30 to accommodate the changes in the target 38 based on the image data. Often, the parameters of the radiation beam 30 are adjusted to encompass a larger target 38 due to the changes in the patient's anatomy. The optimization module 118 instructs (at 348) the couch 82 to resume prescribed speed or operation. As the patient's anatomy changes throughout the treatment, steps 336, 340, 344, and 348 can be repeated according to the treatment plan.
As described above, while the patient 14 receives treatment, the optimization module 118 can instruct the image module 114 to acquire an image(s) of the patient 14. The image module 114 can transfer the acquired image data to the optimization module 118. The optimization module 118 can instruct the radiation module 22 to modify the radiation beam 30 to accommodate the changes in the target 38 based on the image data. Also as described above, treatment specifications can be recorded to be used in subsequent treatment fractions.
As described above, while the patient 14 receives treatment, the optimization module 118 can instruct the image module 114 to acquire an image(s) of the patient 14. The image module 114 can transfer the acquired image data to the optimization module 118. The optimization module 118 can instruct the radiation module 22 to modify the radiation beam 30 to accommodate the changes in the target 38 based on the image data. Also as described above, treatment specifications can be recorded to be used in subsequent treatment fractions.
After treatment begins, the speed of the drive system and direction of the couch 82 may vary from the originally set position during treatment delivery. The treatment delivery module 122 instructs (at 524) the system 10 to begin radiation therapy treatment according to the treatment plan. The drive system 86 moves (at 528) the patient 14 via the couch 82 to the start position. During treatment, the drive system 86 moves (at 532) the patient 14 via the couch 82 through the gantry opening while the gantry 18 rotates (at 536) between the first position and the second position and while the radiation source 24 delivers the radiation beam 30 to the target 38. After the first target 38 has been treated, the couch 82 can be slowed or stopped and steps 512-536 can be repeated for the second target 38. The second target 38 may receive treatment based on a different method of treatment as described above (e.g., topotherapy, dynamic tangent, rocking gantry, etc.).
As described above, while the patient 14 receives treatment, the optimization module 118 can instruct the image module 114 to acquire an image(s) of the patient 14. The image module 114 can transfer the acquired image data to the optimization module 118. The optimization module 118 can instruct the radiation module 22 to modify the radiation beam 30 to accommodate the changes in the target 38 based on the image data. Also as described above, treatment specifications can be recorded to be used in subsequent treatment fractions.
After the patient's first treatment, the same treatment plan can be used for future treatments. Subsequent fractions of the treatment plan can be modified or optimized. For example, the treatment plan can be modified to account for anatomical changes and to remedy errors in the process. In addition, subsequent fractions of the treatment plan can be modified to account for cumulative dose delivered to the target(s) 38. The fractions of the treatment plan can be modified to incorporate the effects of deformation and biological information. The fractions of the treatment plan can be additionally modified based on the initial acquired CT images or based on subsequently acquired CT images. In some embodiments, the system 10 can intersperse image acquisition phases into a radiation therapy treatment plan. This is performed by stopping the couch during a helical or topographic treatment to collect images (and simultaneously gating, stopping, or blocking radiation to the patient), imaging between passes of a multi-pass treatment, imaging between gantry angles or portals of a step-and-shoot type delivery, or imaging between arcs of an IMAT delivery. The system 10 can also provide for treatment verification through dose calculation performed concurrent with delivery of the treatment plan, through dose reconstruction incorporating detector exit data, through recalculation of dose in a 4D image based upon measurements of a patient's motion during treatment, or through modification of the treatment plan in real time or performed retrospectively based upon 4D dose calculation, and/or comparison of 4D dose calculation to the planned delivery. In the case of dose reconstruction through the use of exit data, the exit data can come from a detector such as, for example, a single-row gas ionization detector (e.g., xenon), a multi-row gas ionization detector, a crystal detector, a solid state detector, a flat panel detector (e.g., Amorphous silicon or selenium), or other suitable detecting devices.
Various features of the invention are set forth in the following claims.
This application claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/701,585, filed on Jul. 23, 2005, titled RADIATION THERAPY IMAGING AND DELIVERY UTILIZING COORDINATED MOTION OF GANTRY, COUCH AND MULTI-LEAF COLLIMATOR, the entire contents of which are incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2781454 | Green et al. | Feb 1957 | A |
2793296 | Peterson, Jr. | May 1957 | A |
3949265 | Holl | Apr 1976 | A |
3964467 | Rose | Jun 1976 | A |
4006422 | Schriber | Feb 1977 | A |
4032810 | Eastham et al. | Jun 1977 | A |
4149081 | Seppi | Apr 1979 | A |
4181894 | Pottier | Jan 1980 | A |
4189470 | Rose | Feb 1980 | A |
4208185 | Sawai et al. | Jun 1980 | A |
4273867 | Lin et al. | Jun 1981 | A |
4314180 | Salisbury | Feb 1982 | A |
4335465 | Christiansen et al. | Jun 1982 | A |
4388560 | Robinson et al. | Jun 1983 | A |
4393334 | Glaser | Jul 1983 | A |
4395631 | Salisbury | Jul 1983 | A |
4401765 | Craig et al. | Aug 1983 | A |
4426582 | Orloff et al. | Jan 1984 | A |
4446403 | Cuomo et al. | May 1984 | A |
4480042 | Craig et al. | Oct 1984 | A |
4570103 | Schoen | Feb 1986 | A |
4664869 | Mirzadeh et al. | May 1987 | A |
4703018 | Craig et al. | Oct 1987 | A |
4715056 | Vlasbloem et al. | Dec 1987 | A |
4736106 | Kashy et al. | Apr 1988 | A |
4752692 | Jergenson et al. | Jun 1988 | A |
4754760 | Fukukita et al. | Jul 1988 | A |
4815446 | McIntosh | Mar 1989 | A |
4818914 | Brodie | Apr 1989 | A |
4868843 | Nunan | Sep 1989 | A |
4868844 | Nunan | Sep 1989 | A |
4870287 | Cole et al. | Sep 1989 | A |
4879518 | Broadhurst | Nov 1989 | A |
4912731 | Nardi | Mar 1990 | A |
4936308 | Fukukita et al. | Jun 1990 | A |
4987309 | Klasen et al. | Jan 1991 | A |
4998268 | Winter | Mar 1991 | A |
5003998 | Collett | Apr 1991 | A |
5008907 | Norman et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
5012111 | Ueda | Apr 1991 | A |
5044354 | Goldhorn et al. | Sep 1991 | A |
5065315 | Garcia | Nov 1991 | A |
5073913 | Martin | Dec 1991 | A |
5084682 | Swenson et al. | Jan 1992 | A |
5107222 | Tsuzuki | Apr 1992 | A |
5117829 | Miller et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
5124658 | Adler | Jun 1992 | A |
5138647 | Nguyen et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
5210414 | Wallace et al. | May 1993 | A |
5250388 | Schoch, Jr. et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
5317616 | Swerdloff et al. | May 1994 | A |
5332908 | Weidlich | Jul 1994 | A |
5335255 | Seppi et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5346548 | Mehta | Sep 1994 | A |
5351280 | Swerdloff et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5382914 | Hamm et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5391139 | Edmundson | Feb 1995 | A |
5394452 | Swerdloff et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
5405309 | Carden, Jr. | Apr 1995 | A |
5442675 | Swerdloff et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5446548 | Gerig et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5453310 | Andersen et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5466587 | Fitzpatrick-McElligott et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5471516 | Nunan | Nov 1995 | A |
5483122 | Derbenev et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5489780 | Diamondis | Feb 1996 | A |
5511549 | Legg et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5523578 | Herskovic | Jun 1996 | A |
5528650 | Swerdloff et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5548627 | Swerdloff et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5552605 | Arata | Sep 1996 | A |
5576602 | Hiramoto et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5578909 | Billen | Nov 1996 | A |
5579358 | Lin | Nov 1996 | A |
5581156 | Roberts et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5596619 | Carol | Jan 1997 | A |
5596653 | Kurokawa | Jan 1997 | A |
5621779 | Hughes et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5622187 | Carol | Apr 1997 | A |
5625663 | Swerdloff et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5627041 | Shartle | May 1997 | A |
5641584 | Andersen et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5647663 | Holmes | Jul 1997 | A |
5651043 | Tsuyuki et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5661377 | Mishin et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5661773 | Swerdloff et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5667803 | Paronen et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5668371 | Deasy et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5673300 | Reckwerdt et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5692507 | Seppi et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5695443 | Brent et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5712482 | Gaiser et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5721123 | Hayes et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5724400 | Swerdloff et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5729028 | Rose | Mar 1998 | A |
5734168 | Yao | Mar 1998 | A |
5747254 | Pontius | May 1998 | A |
5751781 | Brown et al. | May 1998 | A |
5753308 | Andersen et al. | May 1998 | A |
5754622 | Hughes | May 1998 | A |
5754623 | Seki | May 1998 | A |
5760395 | Johnstone | Jun 1998 | A |
5802136 | Carol | Sep 1998 | A |
5810707 | Montebello et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5811944 | Sampayan et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5815547 | Shepherd et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5818058 | Nakanishi et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5818902 | Yu | Oct 1998 | A |
5820553 | Hughes | Oct 1998 | A |
5821051 | Androphy et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5821705 | Caporaso et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5823192 | Kalend et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5834454 | Kitano et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5835562 | Ramsdell et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5836905 | Lemelson et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5838765 | Gershman et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5842175 | Andros et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5866912 | Slater et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5870447 | Powell et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5877023 | Sautter et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5877192 | Lindberg et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5912134 | Shartle | Jun 1999 | A |
5920601 | Nigg et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5953461 | Yamada | Sep 1999 | A |
5962995 | Avnery | Oct 1999 | A |
5963615 | Egley et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5969367 | Hiramoto et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5977100 | Kitano et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5983424 | Naslund | Nov 1999 | A |
5986274 | Akiyama et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6011825 | Welch et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6020135 | Levine et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6020538 | Han et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6029079 | Cox et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6038283 | Carol et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6045262 | Igeta et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6049587 | Leksell et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6066927 | Koudijs | May 2000 | A |
6069459 | Koudijs | May 2000 | A |
6071748 | Modlin et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6094760 | Nonaka et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6127688 | Wu | Oct 2000 | A |
6152599 | Salter | Nov 2000 | A |
6171798 | Levine et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6178345 | Vilsmeier et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6197328 | Yanagawa | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6198957 | Green | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6200959 | Haynes et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6204510 | Ohkawa | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6207400 | Kwon | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6218675 | Akiyama et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6222905 | Yoda et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6241670 | Nambu | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6242747 | Sugitani et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6260005 | Yang et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6264825 | Blackburn et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6265837 | Akiyama et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6279579 | Riaziat et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6291823 | Doyle et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6316776 | Hiramoto et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6319469 | Mian et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6322249 | Wofford et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6331194 | Elizondo-Decanini et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6345114 | Mackie et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6360116 | Jackson, Jr. et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6385286 | Fitchard et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6385288 | Kanematsu | May 2002 | B1 |
6393096 | Carol et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6405072 | Cosman | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6407505 | Bertsche | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6417178 | Klunk et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6422748 | Shepherd et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6424856 | Vilsmeier et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6428547 | Vilsmeier et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6433349 | Akiyama et al. | Aug 2002 | B2 |
6438202 | Olivera et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6455844 | Meyer | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6459769 | Cosman | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6462490 | Matsuda et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6465957 | Whitham et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6466644 | Hughes et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6469058 | Grove et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6472834 | Hiramoto et al. | Oct 2002 | B2 |
6473490 | Siochi | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6475994 | Tomalia et al. | Nov 2002 | B2 |
6482604 | Kwon | Nov 2002 | B2 |
6484144 | Martin et al. | Nov 2002 | B2 |
6487274 | Bertsche | Nov 2002 | B2 |
6493424 | Whitham | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6497358 | Walsh | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6498011 | Hohn et al. | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6500343 | Siddiqi | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6504899 | Pugachev et al. | Jan 2003 | B2 |
6510199 | Hughes et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6512942 | Burdette et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6516046 | Frohlich et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6527443 | Vilsmeier et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6531449 | Khojasteh et al. | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6535837 | Schach Von Wittenau | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6539247 | Spetz | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6552338 | Doyle | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6558961 | Sarphie et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6560311 | Shepard et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6562376 | Hooper et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
6584174 | Schubert et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6586409 | Wheeler | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6605297 | Nadachi et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6611700 | Vilsmeier et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6617768 | Hansen | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6618467 | Ruchala et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6621889 | Mostafavi | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6633686 | Bakircioglu et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6634790 | Salter, Jr. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6636622 | Mackie et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6637056 | Tybinkowski et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6646383 | Bertsche et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6653547 | Akamatsu | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6661870 | Kapatoes et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6688187 | Masquelier | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6690965 | Riaziat et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6697452 | Feb 2004 | B2 | |
6705984 | Angha | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6713668 | Akamatsu | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6713976 | Zumoto et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6714620 | Caflisch et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6714629 | Vilsmeier | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6716162 | Hakamata | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6723334 | McGee et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6735277 | McNutt et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6757355 | Siochi | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6760402 | Ghelmansarai | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6774383 | Norimine et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6787771 | Bashkirov et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6787983 | Yamanobe et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6788764 | Saladin et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6792073 | Deasy et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6796164 | McLoughlin et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6800866 | Amemiya et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6822244 | Beloussov et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6822247 | Sasaki | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6838676 | Jackson | Jan 2005 | B1 |
6842502 | Jaffray et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6844689 | Brown et al. | Jan 2005 | B1 |
6865254 | Nafstadius | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6871171 | Agur et al. | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6873115 | Sagawa et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6873123 | Marchand et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6878951 | Ma | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6882702 | Luo | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6882705 | Egley et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6888326 | Amaldi et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6889695 | Pankratov et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6922455 | Jurczyk et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6929398 | Tybinkowski et al. | Aug 2005 | B1 |
6936832 | Norimine et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6955464 | Tybinkowski et al. | Oct 2005 | B1 |
6961405 | Scherch | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6963171 | Sagawa et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6974254 | Paliwal et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
6977984 | Hsieh et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
6984835 | Harada | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6990167 | Chen | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7015490 | Wang et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7046762 | Lee | May 2006 | B2 |
7051605 | Lagraff et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7054413 | Steinberg | May 2006 | B2 |
7060997 | Norimine et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7077569 | Tybinkowski et al. | Jul 2006 | B1 |
7081619 | Bashkirov et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7084410 | Beloussov et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7087200 | Taboas et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7112924 | Hanna | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7130372 | Kusch et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7154991 | Earnst et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7177386 | Mostafavi et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7186986 | Hinderer et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7186991 | Kato et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7187752 | Kotler et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7203272 | Chen | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7209547 | Baier et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7221729 | Wakai et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7221733 | Takai et al. | May 2007 | B1 |
7252307 | Kanbe et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7257196 | Brown et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7265356 | Pelizzari et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7295648 | Brown | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7382858 | Gohno | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7450687 | Yeo et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7469035 | Keall et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7477721 | Chappo et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7492858 | Partain et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7519150 | Romesberg et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7551717 | Tome et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7613501 | Scherch | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7629599 | Hashimoto | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7640607 | Guertin et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7708682 | Pekar et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7831289 | Riker et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7881431 | Aoi et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7940891 | Star-lack et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
7974681 | Wallace et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
7983380 | Guertin et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
8073104 | Yan et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8085899 | Nord et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8175892 | Kapoor et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8331532 | Nord et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8509383 | Lu et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
20020007918 | Owen et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020077545 | Takahashi et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020080915 | Frohlich | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020085668 | Blumhofer et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020091314 | Schlossbauer et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020115923 | Erbel | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020120986 | Erbel | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020122530 | Erbel et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020136439 | Ruchala et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020150207 | Kapatoes et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020187502 | Waterman et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020193685 | Mate et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030007601 | Jaffray et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030031298 | Feb 2003 | A1 | |
20030048868 | Bailey et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030086527 | Speiser et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030105650 | Lombardo et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030174872 | Chalana et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030176779 | Ghelmansarai | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20040010418 | Buonocore et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040024300 | Graf | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040068182 | Misra | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040096033 | Seppi et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040116804 | Mostafavi | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040120452 | Shapiro et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040165696 | Lee | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040184578 | Nakano | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040202280 | Besson | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040202610 | Adair | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040230115 | Scarantino et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040254492 | Zhang et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040254773 | Zhang et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040264640 | Myles | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050013406 | Dyk et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050031181 | Bi et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050080332 | Shiu et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050089141 | Brown | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050096515 | Geng | May 2005 | A1 |
20050123092 | Mistretta et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050143965 | Failla et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050180544 | Sauer et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050197564 | Dempsey | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050201515 | Mitschke | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050201516 | Ruchala et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050251029 | Khamene et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20060072699 | Mackie et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060074292 | Thomson et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060083349 | Harari et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060100738 | Alsafadi et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060133568 | Moore | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060153330 | Wong et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060173294 | Ein-Gal | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060193429 | Chen | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060193441 | Cadman | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060241332 | Klein et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060285639 | Olivera et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060285640 | Nizin et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070041494 | Ruchala et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070041495 | Olivera et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070041496 | Olivera et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070041497 | Schnarr et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070041498 | Olivera et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070041499 | Lu et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070041500 | Olivera et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070043286 | Lu et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070076846 | Ruchala et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070088573 | Ruchala et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070104316 | Ruchala et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070127623 | Goldman et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070127790 | Lau et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070189591 | Lu et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070195922 | Mackie et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070195929 | Ruchala et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070195930 | Kapatoes et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070197908 | Ruchala et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070201613 | Lu et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070211857 | Urano et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070230654 | Chappo et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070238957 | Yared | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20080002809 | Bodduluri | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080002811 | Allison | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080008291 | Alakuijala et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080031406 | Yan et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080049896 | Kuduvalli | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080064953 | Falco | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080279328 | Zeitler et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090041200 | Lu et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090116616 | Lu et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090252291 | Lu et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20100053208 | Menningen et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100054413 | Sobering et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20110019889 | Gering et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110107515 | Brunker et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110112351 | Fordyce et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2091275 | Sep 1993 | CA |
2180227 | Dec 1996 | CA |
1419801 | Mar 2010 | EP |
63209667 | Aug 1988 | JP |
1209077 | Aug 1989 | JP |
6007464 | Jan 1994 | JP |
10052421 | Feb 1998 | JP |
10501151 | Feb 1998 | JP |
11244401 | Sep 1999 | JP |
2001340474 | Dec 2001 | JP |
2002186678 | Jul 2002 | JP |
2002210029 | Jul 2002 | JP |
2002522128 | Jul 2002 | JP |
2002522129 | Jul 2002 | JP |
2003250917 | Sep 2003 | JP |
2004166975 | Jun 2004 | JP |
2004275636 | Oct 2004 | JP |
2004321502 | Nov 2004 | JP |
2005160804 | Jun 2005 | JP |
2005518908 | Jun 2005 | JP |
2007509644 | Apr 2007 | JP |
2007516743 | Jun 2007 | JP |
300853 | Mar 1997 | TW |
9202277 | Feb 1992 | WO |
0007669 | Feb 2000 | WO |
03032838 | Apr 2003 | WO |
03076003 | Sep 2003 | WO |
03092789 | Nov 2003 | WO |
03099380 | Dec 2003 | WO |
2004057515 | Jul 2004 | WO |
2004064641 | Aug 2004 | WO |
2004080522 | Sep 2004 | WO |
2004105574 | Dec 2004 | WO |
2005035061 | Apr 2005 | WO |
2005057463 | Jun 2005 | WO |
2007079854 | Jul 2007 | WO |
Entry |
---|
JS Welsh, RR Patel, MA Ritter, PM Harari, TR Mackie, MP Mehta. Helical tomotherapy: an innovative technology and approach to radiation therapy. Technology in Cancer Research and Treatment. Aug. 2002: pp. 311-316. |
PCT/US06/28533 International Search Report and Written Opinion mailed Sep. 11, 2007. |
Ronald D. Rogus et al., “Accuracy of a Photogrammetry-Based Patient Positioning and Monitoring System for Radiation Therapy,” Medical Physics, vol. 26, Issue 5, May 1999. |
D. Rueckert et al, “Nonrigid Registration Using Free-Form Deformations: Application to Breast MR Images,” IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, vol. 18, No. 8, Aug. 1999. |
Yuan-Nan Young, “Registraion-Based Morphing of Active Contours for Segmentation of CT Scans,” Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, vol. 2, No. 1, Jan. 2005. |
Anthony Yezzi et al., “A Variational Framework for Joint Segmentation and Registration,” Mathematical Method in Biomedical Image Analysis, 2001. (Note: the title of the periodical and the date listed are from the International Search Report, however they do not appear on the article itself.). |
Ruchala, Kenneth, et al., “Adaptive IMRT with Tomotherapy”, RT Image, vol. 14, No. 25, pp. 14-18, Jun. 18, 2001. |
Marcelo Bertalmio, et al., “Morphing Active Contours”, IEEE Translations on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, vol. 22, No. 7, pp. 733-737, Jul. 2000. |
Lu, W., et al., “Automatic Re-Contouring 4D Radiotherapy”, Physical Medical Biology, 2006, Mar. 7, 51 (5): 1077-99. |
Lu, W., et al., 2004 Automatic Re-Contouring for 4-D Planning and Adaptive Radiotherapy, The 90th RSNA Meeting, Chicago, Illinois, (abstract: Radiology 227 p. 543). |
Lu, W., et al., 2004 Automatic Re-Contouring Regions of Interest Based on Deformable Registration and Surface Construction, AAPM 2004, (abstract: Medical Physics 31, 1845-6). |
Purdy, James, “3D Treatment Planning and Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy,” Oncology, vol. 13, No. 10, suppl. 5 (Oct. 1999). |
Yu, Cedric X., et al., “A Method for Implementing Dynamic Photon Beam Intensity Modulation using Independent Jaws and a Multileaf Collimator,” Phys. Med. Biol. 40. 1995: 769-787. |
Lee, Jason et al., “Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy; An Introduction for Patients and Clinicians,” www.oncolink.com/templates/treatment/article.cfm?c=45&s=33&id=182; Jun. 16, 2001. |
Keall, Paul, “4-Dimensional Computed Tomography Imaging and Treatment Planning,” Seminars in Radiation Oncology, vol. 14, No. 1, Jan. 2004; pp. 81-90. |
Kudo et al., “Helical-scan Computed Tomography Using Cone-Beam Projections,” IEEE Conference 1991, ISBN: 0-7803-0513, vol. 3, pp. 1958-1962. |
Lof, J. et al., “An Adaptive Control Algorithm for Optimization of Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy Considering Uncertainties in Beam Profiles, Patient Set-Up and Internal Organ Motion”, Physics in Medicine and Biology 43, 1605-1628, Printed in the UK, 1998. |
Mackie, T. Rockwell et al., “Tomotherapy” Seminars in Radiation Oncology, vol. 9, No. 1, Jan. 1, 1999, pp. 108-117, XP002603992. |
Miller, Karen, “The Phantom Torso”, RT Image, vol. 14 No. 25, Jun. 18, 2001. |
Olivera, G. et al. “Dynamic Tangents and Topotherapy: New Delivery Capabilities for Helical Tomotherapy” Medical Physics [Online],vol. 32, No. 6, Jun. 1, 2005, pp. 2034-2034, XP002603991. |
Michalski, Jeff M. et al., Three-Dimensional Conformal Radiation Therapy (3DCRT) for Prostate Cancer,: The Prostate Cancer InfoLink, Jul. 6, 1996. |
Office Action from Chinese Patent Office for Application No. 200680034654.X dated Jul. 3, 2009. |
Office Action from Chinese Patent Office for Application No. 200680034654.X dated Feb. 11, 2011. |
Extended Search Report from European Patent Office for Application No. 06788221.7 dated Nov. 4, 2010. |
PCT/US2009/043611 International Search Report and Written Opinion mailed Dec. 3, 2009. |
English translation of the Office Action from the Japanese Patent Office for Application No. 2008-523014 dated Jan. 6, 2012 (2 pages). |
Office Action from U.S. Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 12/220,608 dated Dec. 8, 2010. |
Mackie, T. Rockwell et al., “Tomotherapy: Rethinking the Processes of Radiotherapy,” XIIth ICCR, May 27-30, 1997. |
Fang, Guang Y. et al., “Software system for the UW/GE tomotherapy prototype,” Xiith ICCR, May 27-30, 1997. |
Rietzel, Eike et al., “Four-Dimensional Image-Based Treatment Planning: Target Volume Segmentation and Dose Calculation in the Presence of Respiratory Motion,” International Journal of Radiation: Oncology Biology Physics, vol. 61, No. 5, pp. 1535-1550 (Apr. 1, 2005). |
Office Action from Chinese Patent Office for Application No. 200680034654.X dated Mar. 26, 2012. |
Office Action from U.S. Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 12/220,608 dated Aug. 31, 2012. |
English translation of the Office Action from the Japanese Patent Office for Application No. 2008-523014 dated Oct. 24, 2012. |
Office Action from U.S. Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 12/220,608 dated Apr. 25, 2013. |
Office Action from European Patent Office for Application No. 06788221.7 dated Oct. 21, 2013. |
Office Action from U.S. Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 12/220,608 dated Mar. 28, 2014. |
Office Action from European Patent Office for Application No. 06788221.7 dated Jun. 11, 2015. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20070041500 A1 | Feb 2007 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60701585 | Jul 2005 | US |