The present invention relates generally to communication systems and more particularly to a novel radio channel model for Inter Carrier Interference (ICI) cancellation in multi-carrier systems.
In multi-carrier systems, a symbol duration is increased by splitting the high-rate serial data stream into many low-rate parallel streams. As illustrated in
As shown in
The received signal y(n) can be expressed as:
Replacing s(n) with Equation 1, Equation 2 can be rewritten as:
where
and L is the maximum multipath number. The kth sub-carrier output from the FFT module 102 can be expressed as
The dkHk is the expected received signal and the αk represents Inter-Carrier Interference (ICI) caused by the time-varying nature of the channel. wk is white Gaussian noise. Thus, ICI is structured according to the transmit standard.
The ICI is a significant problem for multi-carrier systems, especially in a high mobility environment. As an inherent interference within OFDM-based systems, ICI results from incomplete orthogonality of the sub-carriers, which is caused by several factors, e.g., carrier frequency offset between transmitter and receiver, Doppler Effect, etc. The mobile radio channel brings the spectrum spread to the received signals. When a pure sinusoidal tone of frequency fc is transmitted, the received signal spectrum, called as Doppler spectrum, will have components in the range fc−fm to fc+fm, which is shown in
Considering one sub-carrier on the receiving side, the data on one sub-carrier is interfered with by the data on other sub-carriers, as described by the following Equations 8 and 9
where di is transmitted data, dl′ is the corresponding received data, cl-i is the ICI coefficient representing the ICI power level from the lth sub-carrier on the sub-carrier:
A major reason that past proposed ICI cancellation schemes have not solved the ICI problem is the lack of a suitable channel model for addressing the ICI problem in multi-carrier wireless communication systems.
Other features and advantages of the present invention will become apparent from the following detailed description, taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, illustrating by way of example the principles of the present invention.
A detailed description of the iterative channel estimation method and system to which this method is applied, are now provided.
In the present invention a more accurate channel model is provided. This is a new model in which the basic idea is modelling the frequency domain channel features (ICI included) as having two parts: a first part comprising multiple fixed matrices and a part comprising unfixed variables. The unfixed variables are estimated via the pilots. The more fixed matrices that are used, the more accurately the channel is estimated. Moreover, the unfixed variables can be estimated by a linear algorithm.
The Doppler spectrum spread (range from fc−fm to fc+fm) is divided into many small segments during which the channel impulse response remains almost the same. For each segment, the channel model in Equation 9 serves as a baseline. First, channel impulse response is described for every segment by employing fixed matrices and unfixed variables to approximate Equation 9. By combining all segments, the channel impulse response on the whole Doppler spectrum spread is achieved. If the segmented Doppler spread is small enough, the corresponding channel response can be treated as an impulse function in the frequency domain, as shown in
For each segment, the received signal is:
where Δf is the unitary frequency offset for the segmentation, and h(l) is the time domain channel parameters within one OFDM symbol. The unfixed variables and fixed matrices are divided into L groups, where L is the maximum multipath number and every group includes T variables/matrices.
After the FFT operation at the receiver side, the received frequency domain signal is:
where
is the received signals in frequency domain,
is the transmitted signals in the frequency domain,
is the phase rotation matrix resulting from propagation delay and
is the matrix representing ICI, in which cs is described in Equation 9. As derived in Appendix A,
where T is the rank number used to describe the ICI. The bigger T is, the more accurate Equation 11 is. Therefore, Equation 11 can be rewritten as:
where ht(l) is the unfixed variables including the channel impulse response and Doppler frequency offset for a corresponding segment,
The matrices CtEl(0≦t≦T) of one path are the progressional spread of ICI, and t is the progressional rank. Usually the variables corresponding to lower rank matrices are larger than the variables corresponding to the higher rank matrices, i.e., ht1(l)>ht2(l)(t1<t2).
Combining all the segmentations of the Doppler spread, a practical channel model is achieved. The matrices Ct and El are fixed and only the ht(l)'s are altered along with segmentations. Therefore, the format of the proposed channel model on the whole Doppler spread is the same as Equation 12, the only difference lies in ht(l).
In order to use Equation 12 to describe the channel features, a total of (L+1)(T+1) variables of (ht(l)) have to be estimated. A basic linear estimation algorithm is provided as an example only of how to obtain the variables ht(l), since other algorithms providing the same result can be used. This linear estimation algorithm can be used to estimate the variables if one OFDM symbol includes (L+1)(T+1) pilots signals (or more). The example of a basic linear estimation scheme is described below.
Let the transmitted data have a zero value to construct:
X=[P00 . . . 0P10 . . . 0 . . . P(L+1)(T+1)−1]T
where Ps is a pilot signal and [ . . . ]T is the matrix transposition operator. Correspondingly, the received Pilot signals in the frequency domain are:
Y=[y00 . . . 0y10 . . . 0 . . . y(L+1)(T+1)−1]T
Substituting X and Y into Equation 12 results in a system of (L+1)(T+1) linear equations. Then the variables are derived by solving this set of linear equations, which means low processing delay and achievable performance, especially under high SNR condition.
The present invention provides the above new channel model comprising multiple fixed matrices and unfixed variables, as shown in Equation 12 which describes the channel response, where a total of (L+1)(T+1) variables (ht(l)) are estimated.
Referring now to
The purpose of the invention is to provide a radio channel model suitable for ICI estimation and cancellation in multi-carrier systems.
The channel estimation is conducted in module LE 401. The pilot format and position is assigned according to the UE mobility, and then the pilots are inserted into OFDM symbol before IFFT module PAM 402.
The pilots are assigned to UEs by high layers Pilot Assignment Module 402 and the receiver side demodulates received pilot-only signals using the Fast Fourier Transform 102. Then, according to an exemplary embodiment, a linear estimation module LE 401 can be used to solve a system of (L+1)(T+1) equations, assuming that one OFDM symbol includes (L+1)(T+1) pilots signals (or more)). The example of a basic linear estimation scheme is described below.
Let the transmitted data have a zero value to construct:
X=[P00 . . . 0P10 . . . 0 . . . P(L+1)(T+1)−1]T
where Ps is a pilot signal and [ . . . ]T is the matrix transposition operator. Correspondingly, the received Pilot signals in the frequency domain are:
Y=[y00 . . . 0y10 . . . 0 . . . y(L+1)(T+1)−1]T
Substituting X and Y into Equation 12 results in a system of (L+1)(T+1) linear equations. Then the variables to describe the channel features, a total of (L+1)(T+1) variables of (ht(l)) are derived by solving this set of linear equations, which means low processing delay and achievable performance, especially under high SNR condition. Module LE 401 solves these linear equations and outputs (ht(l)).
While exemplary embodiments of the present invention have been provided, one skilled in the art will realize that the invention is not limited to the specific details and exemplary embodiments shown and described herein. Accordingly, various modifications may be made thereto without departing from the spirit or scope of the general inventive concept as defined by the appended claims and their equivalents.
where F (ΔfT,N) is a function of ΔfT and N:
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/CN2008/001419 | 8/4/2008 | WO | 00 | 2/2/2011 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2010/015101 | 2/11/2010 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
6400761 | Smee et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6970560 | Hench et al. | Nov 2005 | B1 |
7826517 | Kim et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7844018 | Tian et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
20020146063 | Gorokhov et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020186756 | Kolze et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20050141649 | Tanabe | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050147176 | Yun et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20070206689 | Koo et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070211685 | Swarts et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20080101484 | Wu et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080240268 | Yu et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20100008433 | Huang et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1514557 | Jul 2004 | CN |
1750527 | Mar 2006 | CN |
1748612 | Jan 2007 | EP |
2005117381 | Dec 2005 | WO |
2006132589 | Dec 2006 | WO |
2010015101 | Feb 2010 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Zhao, Y., et al; “Sensivity to Doppler Shift and Carrier Frequency Errors in OFDM Systems—The Consequences and Solutions”; IEEE 46th Vechcular Techn. Conf., Atlanta, GA, US; pp. 1564-1568 (1996). |
Jeon, Won Gi; “An Equalization Technique for Orthogonal Frequencydivision Multiplexing Systems in Time-Variant Multi-Path Channels”; IEEE Transactions on Communications, vol. 47, No. 1 (Jan. 1999). |
Armstrong, Jean; “Analysis of New and Existing Methods of Reducing Inter-Carrier Interference Due to Carrier Frequency Offset in OFDM”; IEEE Transations on Communications, vol. 47, No. 3; pp. 365-369 (Mar. 1999). |
Choi, Yang-Seok; “On Channel Estimation and Detection for Multicarrier Signals in Fast and Selective Rayleigh Fading Channels”; IEEE Transactions on Communications, vol. 49, No. 8; (Aug. 2001). |
Nakamura, Mitsuru, et al; “New Estimation and Equalization Approach for OFDM Under Doppler Spread Channel”; 13th IEEE Intl Symp on Personal, Indoor and Mobile Radio Comm, vol. 2; IEEE, Piscataway, NJ, USA; pp. 555-560 (2002). |
Nakamura, Mitsuru, et al; “A Study on an MMSE ICI Canceller for OFDM Under Doppler-Spread Channel”; 14th IEEE 2003 Intl Symp on Personal, Indoor and Mobile Radio Comm, vol. 1; IEEE, Piscataway, NJ, USA; pp. 236-240 (2003). |
Chen, Shaoping, et al; “Intercarrier Inteference Suppression and Channel Estimatin for OFDM Systems in Time-Varying Frequencyselective Fading Channels”;IEEE Transactions on Consumer Electronics, vol. 50, Issue 2; pp. 429-435 (May 2004). |
Cui, Tao, et al; “Low-Complexity Pilot-Aided Channel Estimation for OFDM Systems Over Doubly-Selective Channels”; IEEE Intl Conf on Communications 2005, vol. 3; pp. 1980-1984 (May 2005). |
“Chang, Kapseok; “Cancellation of ICI by Doppler Effect in OFDM Systems”; IEEE VTC (2006)”. |
“3GPP; “TR 25.814V1.22—Physical Layer Aspects of Evolved UTRA” 108 Pages(2006)”. |
Huang, Xiaozhou, et al; “ICI Coefficeint Estimation for OFDM Systems in Mobile Channels”; Global Telecommunications Conference 2006; 5 Pages (Dec. 1, 2006). |
Sheu, Chorng-Ren; “A Low-Complexity Concatenated ICI Cancellation Scheme for High-Mobility OFDM Systems”; IEEE WCNC; 5 Pages (2007). |
Banelli, Paolo, et al; “Data-Aided Kalman Tracking for Channel Estimation in Doppler-Affected OFDM Sytems”; Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing 2007 IEEE Intl Conf on, vol. 3; 4 Pages (Apr. 2007). |
Jian, Qi, et al; “Pilot-Assisted OFDEM Channel Estimation and ICI Cancellation for Double Selective Channels”; Proceedings of IEEE GLOBECOM 2007; pp. 4150-4154 (Nov. 26, 2007). |
Hijazi, et al; “Time-Varying Channel Complex Gains Estimation and ICI Supression in OFDM Systems”; GLOBECOM 2007—IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference, IEEE, Piscataway, NJ, US; pp. 4258-4262 (2007). |
Li, Rui, et al; “Iterative Receiver for MIMO-OFDM Systems With Joint ICI Cancellation and Channel Estimation”; IEEE, Piscataway, NJ, US; 6 Pages (2008). |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for Intl Application PCT/CN2008/001419 (May 14, 2009). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20110135018 A1 | Jun 2011 | US |